(Circulation. 2001;103:213.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Activators Inhibit Tissue Factor Expression and Activity in Human Monocytes
From the Department of Internal Medicine IICardiology, University of Ulm (N. Marx, N.Y., V.H.), Ulm, Germany; the Departments of Immunology and Vascular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute (N. Mackman), La Jolla, Calif; and the Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School (U.S., P.L., J.P.), Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Nikolaus Marx, MD, Department of Internal Medicine II, Cardiology, University of Ulm, Robert-Koch-Straße 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. E-mail nikolaus.marx{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
), a nuclear receptor
family member, regulates gene expression in response to certain fatty
acids and fibric acid derivatives. Given that some of these substances
reduce TF activity in patients, we tested whether PPAR
activators
limit TF responses in human monocytic
cells.
Methods and
ResultsPretreatment of freshly isolated human
monocytes or monocyte-derived macrophages with PPAR
activators
WY14643 and eicosatetraynoic acid (ETYA) led to reduced
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TF activity in a
concentration-dependent manner (maximal reduction to 43±8% with 250
µmol/L WY14643 [P<0.05,
n=5] and to 42±12% with 30 µmol/L ETYA
[P>0.05, n=3]). Two
different PPAR
activators
(15-deoxy_
12,14-prostaglandin
J2 and BRL49653) lacked similar effects. WY14643
also decreased tumor necrosis factor-
protein expression in
supernatants of LPS-stimulated human monocytes. Pretreatment of
monocytes with WY14643 inhibited LPS-induced TF protein and mRNA
expression without altering mRNA half-life. Transient transfection
assays of a human TF promoter construct in THP-1 cells revealed WY14643
inhibition of LPS-induced promoter activity, which appeared to be
mediated through the inhibition of nuclear factor-
B but not to be
due to reduced nuclear factor-
B
binding.
ConclusionsPPAR
activators can reduce TF expression and activity in human
monocytes/macrophages and thus potentially reduce the thrombogenicity
of atherosclerotic lesions. These data provide new insight into how
PPAR
-activating fibric acid derivatives and certain fatty acids
might influence atherothrombosis in patients with vascular
disease.
Key Words: leukocytes thrombosis genes coagulation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B binding site, elements that bind
c-fos/c-jun
and c-Rel/p65 heterodimers,
respectively.8 9
LPS-induced TF expression in cells of the monocyte lineage requires
functional interaction between these transcription
factors.10
Although the clinical course of acute coronary events may be
influenced by reduced monocyte/macrophage TF
expression,11 the mechanisms
inhibiting TF expression in these cells remain largely unexplored.
Animal studies suggest that a diet rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids
(PUFAs) reduces TF expression in mononuclear
cells,12 whereas dietary
intake of PUFAs in humans reduces TF activity in unstimulated and
LPS-stimulated monocytes.13
Thus, PUFAs seem to inhibit monocyte TF expression in vivo, although
through unknown mechanisms. Interestingly, some of the PUFAs used in
those studies (docosahexaenoic acid [DHA] and eicosatetraynoic acid
[ETYA]) are ligands for the peroxisome proliferatoractivated
receptor-
(PPAR
).14
PPAR
, as well as the other members of the PPAR family, PPAR
and
PPAR
, are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the
nuclear hormone receptor
superfamily.15 PPAR
can
be activated by PUFAs as well as lipid-lowering fibric acid
derivatives, such as fenofibrate or
WY14643.16 Although prior
work focused on PPAR
as a regulator of genes involved in lipid
metabolism and fatty acid
oxidation,14 recent studies
have highlighted its anti-inflammatory role in vascular
cells.17 18 The
effect of PPAR
activation on monocyte TF expression is
unknown.
Given the clinical evidence that fibric acid drugs and
PUFA-rich diets may reduce thrombotic complications of
atherosclerosis,12 the
present study tested whether PPAR
activation limits inducible TF
activity and expression in human cells of the monocytic
lineage.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reverse TranscriptasePolymerase Chain
Reaction
Total RNA from freshly isolated monocytes,
monocyte-derived macrophages, or THP-1 cells was isolated by the
guanidinium thiocyanatephenolchloroform method (RNAzol, Tel-Test).
Reverse transcriptase (RT)polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for PPAR
and GAPDH was performed as described
before.20
TF Activity Assay
For TF activity assays, monocytes, monocyte-derived
macrophages, or THP-1 cells were pretreated with PPAR activators
(PPAR
activators: ETYA, Sigma, and WY14643, Biomol; PPAR
activators: 15-deoxy_
12,14-prostaglandin
J2 [15d-PGJ2],
Calbiochem, and BRL49653, SmithKline Beecham) for 30 minutes at the
concentrations indicated and then LPS-stimulated (100 µg/L for
monocytes, 10 mg/L for THP-1 cells) for 5 hours. TF activity was
determined by using a standard chromogenic assay (American
Diagnostica).6
TNF-
ELISA
Monocytes or THP-1 cells
(1x106 cells/mL) were pretreated with the
PPAR
activator WY14643 for 30 minutes before LPS stimulation at the
concentrations indicated. Cells were cultured for 24 hours, and a tumor
necrosis factor (TNF)-
ELISA (R&D Systems) was performed on
cell-free supernatants by using a recombinant TNF-
standard
curve.
Western Blot Analysis
For Western blot analysis of TF and TFPI expression,
human monocytes or monocyte-derived macrophages were pretreated with
WY14643 (30 minutes) at the concentrations indicated and stimulated
with LPS (5 hours). Standard Western blot analysis on total cell
lysates was performed by using mouse anti-human TF and mouse anti-human
TFPI antibodies (monoclonal antibodies, American Diagnostica).
Restaining with
-tubulin antibodies ensured equal loading of intact
protein.
RNA Extraction and Northern Blot
Analysis
For Northern blot experiments, cells were pretreated
with the PPAR
or PPAR
activators for 30 minutes and then
LPS-stimulated (100 µg/L, 2 hours). Five micrograms of total RNA was
used in standard Northern blot analysis with the use of TF, TNF-
, or
GAPDH cDNA probes.
TF mRNA half-life was determined by stimulating monocytes with LPS for 2 hours before blocking transcription with actinomycin D (5 µg/L). Cells then received WY14643 for the times indicated, and mRNA levels were compared with untreated cells.
Transient Transfection Assays
To investigate the effect of PPAR
activators on TF
or TNF-
promoter activity, we transiently transfected THP-1 cells
with TF promoter constructs containing the luciferase reporter
[pTF(-2106)-LUC and pTNF-
-LUC] as previously
described.9 To determine the
effect of PPAR
on NF-
B activation,
p(
B)4LUC, a luciferase reporter construct
containing 4 copies of the TF-
B site cloned upstream from the
minimal simian virus 40
promoter9 was transfected
into THP-1 cells. Transfected cells were cultured for 46 hours before
stimulation with LPS (10 mg/L) for 5 hours. Cells were harvested, and
luciferase activity was measured as described
before.19
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift
Assay
Nuclear extracts of THP-1 cells were prepared by
using standard procedures.19
THP-1 cells were stimulated for 2 hours with LPS (10 µg/mL) with or
without WY14643 (10 or 100 µmol/L) pretreatment before nuclear
extract preparation. Oligonucleotides for the TF-specific NF-
B site
(5'-GTCCCGGAGTTTCCTACC-3') or the prototypic site from the murine Ig
gene were annealed with a complementary primer and radiolabeled with
the use of [
-32P]dCTP (ICN) as
described.19 Protein-DNA
complexes were separated from free DNA probe by electrophoresis (6%
nondenaturing acrylamide gels/0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA), and
autoradiography was performed.
Assessment of Total Protein
Synthesis
To determine the effects of WY14643 on total protein
synthesis in human monocytes, cells were treated with LPS in the
absence or presence of WY14643 in media containing
[35S]methionine (0.2 Ci/mL)
(Table
).
After 5 hours, cells were harvested, and total protein synthesis in
both lysates and supernatants was measured by counting radioactivity
after cold trichloroacetic acid
precipitation.18
|
Statistical Analysis
Results of the experimental studies are reported as
mean±SEM or mean±SD. Differences were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA
followed by the Fisher least significant difference test. A value of
P<0.05 was regarded as
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|

in cells of the
monocyte lineage used in our experiments, RT-PCR was performed. Freshly
isolated human monocytes, monocyte-derived macrophages, and
monocyte-like THP-1 cells all contained PPAR
mRNA as detected by a
276-bp RT-PCR product
(Figure 1
|
PPAR
Activators Inhibit
LPS-Induced TF Activity and TNF-
Expression in Human
Monocytes
To determine the effect of PPAR
activation on
LPS-induced TF activity in freshly isolated human monocytes, purified
cells were pretreated for 30 minutes with the PPAR
activators
WY14643 or ETYA at the concentrations indicated and then stimulated for
5 hours with LPS (100 µg/L) before TF activity assays were performed.
As expected, monocyte TF activity markedly increased in response to LPS
stimulation. Pretreatment of cells with the PPAR
activators WY14643
(Figure 2A
) and ETYA
(Figure 2B
) inhibited LPS-induced TF activity in a
concentration-dependent manner, with a maximal reduction at 250
µmol/L WY14643 or 30 µmol/L ETYA to 43±8%
(P<0.05, n=5) or 42±12%
(P<0.05, n=3), respectively.
Two different PPAR
activators, the naturally occurring ligand
15d-PGJ2 and the antidiabetic agent BRL49653
(rosiglitazone), had no significant effect
(P=NS, n=3;
Figure 2B
). PPAR
activators alone also had no effect on
TF activity (data not shown). Cell viability in all conditions was
>95%, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, suggesting that
enhanced cell death is not responsible for these observations. In
addition, WY14643 did not affect total protein synthesis in LPS-treated
human monocytes, thus making toxic effects of PPAR
activators an
unlikely explanation for our findings
(Table
).
|
To investigate whether PPAR
alters other LPS-induced
genes in human monocytes, we measured the effect of WY14643 on monocyte
TNF-
protein secretion after LPS stimulation. Pretreatment of
monocytes for 30 minutes with the PPAR
activator WY14643
significantly reduced LPS-induced TNF-
protein content in the
supernatant
(Figure 2C
), with a maximal inhibition at 250 µmol/L
WY14643 (7696±449 pg/mL in LPS-treated cells versus 4490±197 pg/mL in
LPS- and WY14643-treated cells,
P<0.05; n=3). As
previously reported,21 2
PPAR
activators had no effect on LPS-induced TNF-
secretion.
PPAR
Activation Inhibits TF
Protein Expression in Human Monocytes
To test whether the effect of PPAR
on TF activity
corresponded to changes in TF protein levels, human monocytes were
pretreated and stimulated as indicated, and Western Blot analysis was
performed on total cell lysates. Stimulation of monocytes with LPS
markedly increased TF protein expression, whereas 30-minute
pretreatment with the PPAR
activator WY14643 reduced cellular TF
protein content in a concentration-dependent manner
(Figure 3
, top). In contrast, WY14643 did not reduce the
expression of TFPI, the intrinsic inhibitor of TF activity
(Figure 3
, middle).
|
PPAR
, but Not PPAR
, Activators
Reduce LPS-Induced TF mRNA Levels in Human Monocytes
Northern blot analysis was used for the evaluation of a
potential effect of PPAR
ligands at the mRNA level. Increased TF
mRNA levels after a 2-hour stimulation of human monocytes with LPS (100
µg/L) could be inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by
30-minute pretreatment with the PPAR
activator WY14643
(Figure 4A
). In contrast, pretreatment of monocytes with 2
different PPAR
activators, 15d-PGJ2 (10
µmol/L) and BRL49653 (10 µmol/L), had no such effect
(Figure 4B
). In addition, WY14643 also decreased LPS-induced
TNF-
mRNA expression
(Figure 4C
). Stimulation experiments in the presence of
actinomycin D revealed that WY14643 did not significantly reduce TF
mRNA half-life compared with the control condition
(Figure 4D
), indicating that PPAR
activators affect TF
transcription but not mRNA stability.
|
WY14643 Reduces LPS-Induced TF
Activity as Well as TF Protein and mRNA Expression in Monocyte-Derived
Macrophages
To determine whether PPAR
activators had similar
effects on TF activity in a more macrophage-like cell type, human
monocytederived macrophages were used for stimulation experiments. As
expected, these cells had higher baseline TF activity than did
monocytes. Pretreatment of monocyte-derived macrophages with WY14643
reduced LPS-induced TF activity in a concentration-dependent manner
with a maximal reduction at 100 µmol/L to 40.3±7.6%
(P<0.05 compared with
LPS-stimulated cells,
Figure 5A
). In addition, WY14643 also decreased LPS-induced
TF protein
(Figure 5B
) and mRNA expression
(Figure 5C
) in these cells.
|
WY14643 Inhibits LPS-Induced TF
Activity and TNF-
Protein Expression in Monocyte-Like THP-1
Cells
Because prior studies have successfully used monocytic
THP-1 cells for investigating the regulation of TF
expression,9 19 we
used this cell line to study responsiveness to PPAR
agonism in
anticipation of promoter analysis. Treatment of THP-1 cells with the
PPAR
activator WY14643 decreased LPS-induced (10 mg/L) TF activity
as well as TNF-
protein expression in a concentration-dependent
fashion
(Figure 6
). Maximal reduction of TF activity to 9.3±0.4%
was achieved in cells treated with 100 µmol/L WY14643 compared with
LPS-stimulated cells. WY14643 decreased TNF-
protein expression from
1396±58 pg/mL in LPS-treated cells to 144±8 pg/mL. These data
indicate that the more readily transfectable monocyte-like THP-1 cells
can be used to examine the effects of PPAR
activators on TF and
TNF-
.
|
PPAR
Activation Inhibits LPS-Induced TF and
TNF-
Promoter Activity
THP-1 cells were transiently transfected with TF
(pTF-LUC) or TNF-
(pTNF-LUC) promoter-reporter constructs to
determine the effects of PPAR
activation on LPS-induced promoter
activity. Stimulation of transfected cells with LPS (10 mg/L) increased
TF promoter activity 7.8±1.8-fold, whereas 30-minute pretreatment with
WY14643 reduced this increase to 3.3±1.1-fold
(Figure 7A
). Similar results were obtained when cells were
transfected with the TNF-
promoter construct
(Figure 7B
). WY14643 alone had no effect on TF or TNF-
promoter activity.
|
PPAR
Activator WY14643 Reduces NF-
B
Activation but Does Not Inhibit DNA Binding of NF-
B Transcription
Factors p65/c-Rel
To assess the effect of PPAR
activation on
LPS-induced NF-
B activation, transient transfection experiments of
reporter construct p(
B)4LUC were performed.
Stimulation of transfected cells with LPS (10 µg/mL) induced a
50±5-fold increase in luciferase activity, which was reduced by 30%
to 35±7-fold by WY14643
(Figure 8A
). To investigate whether PPAR
activation
inhibits binding of NF-
B transcription factors to the TF promoter,
we performed gel-shift analysis (electrophoretic mobility shift assay)
with the use of oligonucleotides corresponding to the TF NF-
B site.
PPAR
activation did not inhibit LPS-induced nuclear translocation
and DNA binding of the NF-
B proteins to the TF promoter
(Figure 8B
, left) nor did PPAR
activation alter binding of
the NF-
B proteins p50/p65, known to regulate monocyte TNF-
gene
expression
(Figure 8B
, right).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression by PPAR
activators in human
monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. This effect is mediated
through an inhibition of gene transcription, likely through changes in
NF-
B activation.
Human monocytes and macrophages express PPAR
as well as
PPAR
,21 22 23 24
although the amount of PPAR
compared with PPAR
may be lower in
these cells.24 In monocytes,
PPAR
increases during differentiation, and its stimulation can
inhibit the expression of genes implicated in
atherosclerosis.21 22 23 24
However, we did not observe any effects of PPAR
activators on
LPS-induced TF or TNF-
expression. These findings concur with
previous reports showing that PPAR
activators inhibit phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate but not LPS-induced TNF-
expression.21 The lack of an
effect by PPAR
activators on TF and TNF-
expression might result
from lower levels of PPAR
in these cells or may indicate different
PPAR subtype specificity. The PPAR
activators used in the present
study, the fibric acid derivative WY14643 and the PUFA ETYA, likely
inhibit TF expression via effects on PPAR
. Both agents are known to
be selective PPAR
activators.16 Our
experiments also revealed that lower concentrations of WY14643 yielded
similar effects on TF activity and expression in monocyte-derived
macrophages (
60% reduction at 100 µmol/L WY14643) compared with
freshly isolated monocytes (
57% reduction at 250 µmol/L WY14643).
This finding might reflect higher PPAR
expression levels in
macrophages as previously described by Chinetti et
al.24
The reduction of TF activity, protein, and mRNA expression
by PPAR
activators likely results from inhibition of gene
transcription given its inhibition of LPS-induced TF promoter activity
as well as the lack of an effect of WY14643 on TF mRNA half-life. The
reduction of NF-
B activation by PPAR
parallels our observation
that PPAR
activators also decrease LPS-induced expression and
promoter activity of TNF-
, another NF-
Bregulated gene.
Gel-shift experiments suggest that PPAR
does not inhibit LPS-induced
nuclear translocation or DNA binding of NF-
B transcription factors
to the TF promoter. Several models might account for the effect of
PPAR
on functional NF-
B activity independent of DNA-protein
complex assembly. The NF-
B proteins c-Rel/p65 and PPAR
have been
shown to interact with several transcriptional coactivators, such as
cAMP response elementbinding protein or
p30025 26 ;
competition for such coactivators might inhibit NF-
B signaling
through a "sequestering" effect. Alternatively, a direct
protein-protein interaction between PPAR
and c-Rel/p65 or between
PPAR
and another coactivator might allow binding of NF-
B proteins
to the promoter but prevent functional activation of NF-
B, as
suggested
previously.27
Other mechanisms in addition to the
30% inhibition of
NF-
B activation suggested by the p(
B)4LUC
construct experiments might account for the effects of PPAR
on TF
and TNF-
. Because AP-1 is implicated in TF expression, its
inhibition by PPAR
could also be
involved.27 Alternatively,
the effects of PPAR
might engage a transcriptional repressor complex
with corepressors such as N-CoR, as previously suggested in the context
of the effects of retinoic acid receptor on TF
expression.28
Our findings that PPAR
activators reduce monocyte TF
expression but not the expression of the intrinsic inhibitor of TF
activity, TFPI, suggest a PPAR
-mediated shift toward limiting a
critical procoagulant in atherosclerosis, an effect with possible
important in vivo relevance. Diets enriched in PPAR
-activating PUFAs
can limit the occurrence and course of acute coronary
events,29 and clinical
studies with fibric acid derivatives demonstrate reduced cardiovascular
events in patients with coronary heart
disease.30 The regulation by
PPAR
of monocyte and macrophage TF expression may contribute to
these reported benefits, a particular intriguing possibility given
recent data from the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein
Cholesterol Intervention Trial (VA-HIT), which demonstrated that fibric
acid derivatives decrease cardiac events in coronary heart disease
patients with low LDL levels despite only a modest HDL
increase.31 The observations
reported in the present study may offer one molecular mechanism
contributing to how PUFA-rich diets and fibrates might reduce acute
coronary events.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 10, 2000; revision received August 22, 2000; accepted August 23, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activators inhibit cytokine-induced
vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 expression in human endothelial
cells. Circulation. 1999;99:31253131.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Rigamonti, G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi, and B. Staels Regulation of Macrophage Functions by PPAR-{alpha}, PPAR-{gamma}, and LXRs in Mice and Men Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(6): 1050 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wang and Y.-J. Y. Wan Nuclear Receptors and Inflammatory Diseases Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2008; 233(5): 496 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bouwens, L. A Afman, and M. Muller Fasting induces changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression profiles related to increases in fatty acid {beta}-oxidation: functional role of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor {alpha} in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1515 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Brown and J. Plutzky Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors as Transcriptional Nodal Points and Therapeutic Targets Circulation, January 30, 2007; 115(4): 518 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zambon, P. Gervois, P. Pauletto, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels Modulation of Hepatic Inflammatory Risk Markers of Cardiovascular Diseases by PPAR-{alpha} Activators: Clinical and Experimental Evidence Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2006; 26(5): 977 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Walcher, A. Kummel, B. Kehrle, H. Bach, M. Grub, R. Durst, V. Hombach, and N. Marx LXR Activation Reduces Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression in Human CD4-Positive Lymphocytes Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2006; 26(5): 1022 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Steffel, T. F. Luscher, and F. C. Tanner Tissue Factor in Cardiovascular Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 722 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Staels and J.-C. Fruchart Therapeutic Roles of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Agonists Diabetes, August 1, 2005; 54(8): 2460 - 2470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Li and C. K. Glass PPAR- and LXR-dependent pathways controlling lipid metabolism and the development of atherosclerosis J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2161 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, H. Duez, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Atherogenesis: Regulators of Gene Expression in Vascular Cells Circ. Res., May 14, 2004; 94(9): 1168 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, D. Walcher, C. Raichle, M. Aleksic, H. Bach, M. Grub, V. Hombach, P. Libby, A. Zieske, S. Homma, et al. C-Peptide Colocalizes with Macrophages in Early Arteriosclerotic Lesions of Diabetic Subjects and Induces Monocyte Chemotaxis In Vitro Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(3): 540 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Luscher, M. A. Creager, J. A. Beckman, and F. Cosentino Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical Consequences, and Medical Therapy: Part II Circulation, September 30, 2003; 108(13): 1655 - 1661. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Ziouzenkova, S. Perrey, L. Asatryan, J. Hwang, K. L. MacNaul, D. E. Moller, D. J. Rader, A. Sevanian, R. Zechner, G. Hoefler, et al. Lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins generates PPAR ligands: Evidence for an antiinflammatory role for lipoprotein lipase PNAS, March 4, 2003; 100(5): 2730 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Kintscher, C. Lyon, S. Wakino, D. Bruemmer, X. Feng, S. Goetze, K. Graf, A. Moustakas, B. Staels, E. Fleck, et al. PPAR{alpha} Inhibits TGF-{beta}-Induced {beta}5 Integrin Transcription in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells by Interacting With Smad4 Circ. Res., November 29, 2002; 91 (11): e35 - e44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takayama, G. Garcia-Cardena, G. K. Sukhova, J. Comander, M. A. Gimbrone Jr., and P. Libby Prostaglandin E2 Suppresses Chemokine Production in Human Macrophages through the EP4 Receptor J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44147 - 44154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|