Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;104:1881-1883

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.

(Circulation. 2001;104:1881.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Cholesterol in Vascular and Valvular Calcification

Linda L. Demer, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Medicine and Physiology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Linda L. Demer, MD, PhD, Maud Cady Guthman Professor of Medicine and Physiology, Vice Chair, Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Mail Box 951679, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1679.


Key Words: Editorials • atherosclerosis • calcium • lipids

In the early 1990s, the late Jeff Hoeg had the foresight to ask whether vascular calcification relates to the duration and severity of exposure to cholesterol. In a group of homozygous hyperlipidemic patients for whom detailed records of cholesterol levels were available over a long period of time, he and his colleagues found that coronary calcification scores by ultrafast computed tomographic scanning correlated significantly with the cholesterol year product.1 Studies that lack long-term cholesterol history may miss a correlation between lipids and calcification, because current treatments so dramatically change cholesterol levels as to make them unrepresentative of long-term exposure.

See p 1927

In the present issue of Circulation, Pohle et al2 successfully overcame these difficulties by studying the rate of change in calcification as a function of change in lipid levels, excluding patients in whom treatment was altered during the study period. These investigators found that both coronary calcification and aortic valve calcification progress more rapidly in subjects with levels of LDL >130 mg/dL. This finding dovetails with those of Callister et al,3 who discovered that patients who successfully lowered their cholesterol levels with lipid-lowering agents significantly reduced the progression of coronary calcification. In a large population of young subjects, the risk factor that correlated most significantly with coronary calcification was LDL cholesterol.4 This relation was stronger than the correlation with age, smoking, fasting insulin, blood pressure, or male sex.4 In another study of asymptomatic outpatients, LDL cholesterol was the only risk factor correlating with progression of coronary calcification by electron-beam computed tomography over an 18-month period.5

The correlation of LDL cholesterol exposure to valvular and vascular calcification raises the possibility of a mechanistic role, which is also supported by in vitro studies. Two groups showed that lipid elements in atherosclerotic plaque may serve as the nidus for mineralization, as they do in bone.6,7 In addition, in vitro studies have shown that the artery wall contains cells capable of osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization.810 Further studies have shown that osteogenesis in these cells is induced by oxidized lipids.11 Although the source of these cells has not been established, the presence of heterogeneous subpopulations in the media has long been proposed by Julie and Gordon Campbell and colleagues, and the possibility that calcifying valvular or vascular cells derive from circulating precursor cells is supported by their recent demonstration that marrow stromal-derived cells are present in atherosclerotic neointima.12

Heart valve calcification has received less research attention than artery wall calcification. Textbooks have distinguished calcific and atherosclerotic aortic stenosis as 2 separate diseases. The calcific form has been attributed to degeneration or "wear-and-tear," a factor that was thought to contribute to a variety of diseases until adequate research identified their true causes. Ongoing research now suggests that it is time to replace the old view on aortic stenosis.

Calcific aortic stenosis may simply represent a later stage or one end of the spectrum of atherosclerotic disease, as calcified plaque does in the artery wall. As with vascular calcification, calcification in cardiac valves is now known to have many features of bone formation. The degree and location of valvular calcification closely corresponds with mRNA expression of osteopontin, a protein regulating biomineralization.13 Feldman et al14 described ossification in human aortic valve specimens. In a more systematic examination of {approx}350 human aortic valves removed for replacement surgery, Mohler et al15 found that most were calcified and that {approx}15% contained fully-formed, lamellar or endochondral bone tissue with hematopoietic marrow and evidence of remodeling. Specimens containing bone tissue also showed expression of the potent osteogenic factors bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and BMP-4.

In vitro studies of cardiac valve cells have also revealed similarities with in vitro vascular calcification. Mohler’ group also harvested cells from the aortic valves of humans and dogs. They identified and characterized a subpopulation of mesenchymal cells from the interstitial cell population that were able to produce nodules containing hydroxyapatite-mineralized matrix in vitro. These nodules were essentially identical to the calcifying vascular cells that were previously isolated from the aortic media,7 and they were induced to mineralize by the same factors: TGF-ß, 25-hydroxycholesterol, and BMP-2.

A unique feature of cardiac valve tissue, the lack of conventional smooth muscle cells, provides a clue about the origin of calcifying valvular cells. Although some {alpha}-smooth muscle actin has been observed in diseased valves, in general, only endothelial, fibroblastic, and interstitial cells are considered normal constituents. This would support the concept that calcifying valvular cells are not dedifferentiated or redifferentiated smooth muscle cells. Whatever the origin, whether embryonic remnant, blood-borne precursor, or local mesenchymal tissue, Mohler’ mesenchymal cells in valves may be the same cells as calcifying vascular cells in the artery wall.

As with artery wall calcification, lipids may also contribute to valvular calcification. Cholesterol concentration is significantly higher in patients with calcific aortic stenosis than in control subjects.16 In bioprosthetic valves, eliminating lipids from the biological matrix by ethanol extraction prevents in vivo calcification.17 Bioprosthetic valves raise an interesting question. They are considered free of viable cells after glutaraldehyde fixation. Nevertheless, they undergo mineralization, suggesting that valvular calcification may be cell-independent and passive. However, it is possible that the cell-produced matrix and/or its fixative-modified proteins have the proper physical characteristics to serve as crystallization foci. Thus, the regulated aspect of mineralization, cellular production of a mineral-competent matrix, may have already been completed. Another possibility is that cells migrate into or deposit on the bioprosthetic valves. Recent studies from a variety of laboratories indicate that circulating blood contains immature mesenchymal cells capable of differentiation into endothelial, smooth muscle, and other lineages, presumably from the marrow stromal cell population,18 much the same way as hematopoietic stem cells are present in peripheral blood and are capable of incorporating themselves into tissue. If cells can deposit themselves onto devitalized bioprosthetic valve tissue and deposit appropriate matrix, then cellular-regulated mineralization may take place.

One consequence of the fact that vascular calcification resembles osteogenesis deep within the artery wall is that infusions capable of dissolving the calcium mineral that forms within matrix in vascular tissue should be equally capable of dissolving the calcium mineral that forms within skeletal bone. Newly forming bone in the skeleton is located immediately adjacent to the subendothelial space of the Haversian canals and marrow, only a few cell thicknesses from the blood lumen. Because atherosclerotic calcification is usually much deeper, skeletal calcification may be more likely to be removed by intravenous chelators than atherosclerotic calcification.

Some evidence raises concerns that warfarin has a role in cardiovascular calcification. The small protein matrix GLA protein (MGP) is thought to serve as an inhibitor of soft-tissue calcification, possibly through inhibitory interaction with BMP-2.19 GLA proteins, which include coagulation cascade factors, are unusual in having post-translational carboxylation of certain glutamic acid residues, a modification thought to be important for function. The carboxylase responsible for this modification depends on vitamin K. Because warfarin interferes with vitamin K–dependent enzymes, it is theoretically possible that warfarin treatment or dietary vitamin K deficiency may increase the risk of vascular calcification by reducing the mineral-inhibitory activity of MGP.

It has been suggested that calcification does not increase the risk of plaque rupture because it does not weaken the plaque’ resistance to hoop stresses. If anything, calcification should increase resistance to circumferential hoop stresses. However, instability is expected to be induced by calcium deposits through dramatically increased solid shear stresses along the sharp interface where the pulsating, compliant soft tissue meets mineral. This interface is the known site of plaque rupture during balloon angioplasty.20

With aging, soft tissues harden and hard tissues soften. One explanation may be that both processes are stages of last resort in chronic inflammatory responses to various stimuli, including oxidized lipids or autoimmune phenomena. Chronic inflammation may have evolved from mechanisms protecting against microorganisms and even macroorganisms such as helminths. The last resort of immune defense in soft tissue is to wall off the invader with a bone barrier. The amorphous calcium mineral may simply be the first stage in osteogenesis. In hard tissue infection, the anchorage-dependent microorganisms thrive in mineral matrix, and the defense of last resort is to eliminate that anchorage by dissolving the mineral matrix. This process is known as inflammatory osteolysis.

It is optimistic to conclude, on the basis of this study’ correlation, that cholesterol lowering may prevent or reverse valvular calcification. Drawing treatment conclusions from correlations may oblige us to send coronary patients to plastic surgeons for the correction of ear lobe creases. However, the findings of Pohle et al2 warrant aggressive investigation of a causative relation between cholesterol and cardiovascular calcification.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

References

1. Hoeg JM, Feuerstein IM, Tucker EE. Detection and quantitation of calcific atherosclerosis by ultrafast computed tomography in children and young adults with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994; 14: 1066–1074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Pohle K, Mäffert R, Ropers D, et al. Progression of aortic valve calcification: association with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1927–1932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooli B, et al. Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1972–1978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Bild DE, Folsom AR, Lowe LP, et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary calcification in black and white young adults: the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Arteroscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 852–857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Mohlenkamp S, et al. Natural history and topographic pattern of progression of coronary calcification in symptomatic patients: an electron-beam CT study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21: 421–426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Sarig S, Weiss TA, Katz I, et al. Detection of cholesterol associated with calcium mineral using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Lab Invest. 1994; 71: 782–787.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Tanimura A, McGregor DH, Anderson HC. Calcification in atherosclerosis, I: human studies. J Exp Pathol. 1986; 2: 261–273.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Bostrom K, Watson KE, Horn S, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91: 1800–1809.

9. Shanahan CM, Cary NR, Salisbury JR, et al. Medial localization of mineralization-regulating proteins in association with Monckeberg’ sclerosis: evidence for smooth muscle cell-mediated vascular calcification. Circulation. 1999; 100: 2168–2176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Shioi A, Nishizawa Y, Jono S, et al. ß-Glycerophosphate accelerates calcification in cultured bovine vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995; 15: 2003–2009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Parhami F, Morrow AD, Balucan J, et al. Lipid oxidation products have opposite effects on calcifying vascular cell and bone cell differentiation: a possible explanation for the paradox of arterial calcification in osteoporotic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 680–687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Han CI, Campbell GR, Campbell JH. Circulating bone marrow cells can contribute to neointimal formation. J Vasc Res. 2001; 38: 113–119.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. O"Brien KD, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, et al. Osteopontin is expressed in human aortic valvular lesions. Circulation. 1995; 92: 2163–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Feldman T, Glagov S, Carroll JD. Restenosis following successful balloon valvuloplasty: bone formation in aortic valve leaflets. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993; 29: 1–7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Mohler ER3rd, Chawla MK, Chang AW, et al. Identification and characterization of calcifying valve cells from human and canine aortic valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999; 8: 254–260.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Chui MC, Newby DE, Panarelli M, et al. Association between calcific aortic stenosis and hypercholesterolemia: is there a need for a randomized controlled trial of cholesterol-lowering therapy? Clin Cardiol. 2001; 24: 52–55.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Vyavahare NR, Jones PL, Hirsch D, et al. Prevention of glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by alcohol pretreatment: further mechanistic studies. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000; 9: 561–566.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997; 276: 71–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Bostrom K, Tsao D, Shen S, et al. Matrix Gla protein modulates differentiation induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2 in C3H10T1/2 cells. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 14044–14052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Fitzgerald PJ, Ports TA, Yock PG. Contribution of localized calcium deposits to dissection after angioplasty: an observational study using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1992; 86: 64–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
N. M. Rajamannan
Calcific Aortic Stenosis: Lessons Learned From Experimental and Clinical Studies
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2009; 29(2): 162 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. Zeng, P. Nievelstein-Post, Y. Yin, K.-M. Jan, J. S. Frank, and D. S. Rumschitzki
Macromolecular transport in heart valves. III. Experiment and theory for the size distribution of extracellular liposomes in hyperlipidemic rabbits
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2687 - H2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. Arishiro, M. Hoshiga, N. Negoro, D. Jin, S. Takai, M. Miyazaki, T. Ishihara, and T. Hanafusa
Angiotensin Receptor-1 Blocker Inhibits Atherosclerotic Changes and Endothelial Disruption of the Aortic Valve in Hypercholesterolemic Rabbits
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1482 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Aikawa, M. Nahrendorf, D. Sosnovik, V. M. Lok, F. A. Jaffer, M. Aikawa, and R. Weissleder
Multimodality Molecular Imaging Identifies Proteolytic and Osteogenic Activities in Early Aortic Valve Disease
Circulation, January 23, 2007; 115(3): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Aboulhosn and J. S. Child
Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction: Subaortic Stenosis, Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis, and Coarctation of the Aorta
Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2412 - 2422.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
B. Wu, S. Elmariah, F. S. Kaplan, G. Cheng, and E. R. Mohler III
Paradoxical Effects of Statins on Aortic Valve Myofibroblasts and Osteoblasts: Implications for End-Stage Valvular Heart Disease
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2005; 25(3): 592 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. S. Farivar, L. H. Cohn, E. G. Soltesz, T. Mihaljevic, J. D. Rawn, and J. G. Byrne
Transcriptional profiling and growth kinetics of endothelium reveals differences between cells derived from porcine aorta versus aortic valve
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. S. Farivar and L. H. Cohn
Hypercholesterolemia is a risk factor for bioprosthetic valve calcification and explantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 969 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. M. Bashore and T. J. Gardner
Valvular heart disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 388 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Atar, D S Jeon, H Luo, and R J Siegel
Mitral annular calcification: a marker of severe coronary artery disease in patients under 65 years old
Heart, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 161 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Bidder, J.-S. Shao, N. Charlton-Kachigian, A. P. Loewy, C. F. Semenkovich, and D. A. Towler
Osteopontin Transcription in Aortic Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Is Controlled by Glucose-regulated Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Activator Protein-1 Activities
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44485 - 44496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.