(Circulation. 2001;104:2007-2011.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology (J.E.S., M.A.C., A.C.A., A.S.A., L.F.T., A.G.M.R.S.), São Paulo, Brazil; Thoraxcenter, Dijkzigt University Hospital (B.J.R., K.K., G.V.L. P.W.S.), Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Cordis, a Johnson and Johnson Company (R.F., J.J.), Warren, NJ; and Brigham and Womens Hospital (J.J.P.), Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Professor J. Eduardo Sousa, MD, PhD, Director of the Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology, Av. Dr Dante Pazzanese, 500 - Ibirapuera, 04012180, São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail jesousa{at}uol.com.br
Received July 10, 2001; revision received August 14, 2001; accepted August 15, 2001.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Forty-five patients with de novo coronary disease were successfully treated with the implantation of a single sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent in São Paulo, Brazil (n=30, 15 fast release [group I, GI] and 15 slow release [GII]) and Rotterdam, The Netherlands (15 slow release, GIII). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was obtained at 4 and 12 months (GI and GII) and 6 months (GIII). In-stent minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis remained essentially unchanged in all groups (at 12 months, GI and GII; at 6 months, GIII). Follow-up in-lesion minimal lumen diameter was 2.28 mm (GIII), 2.32 mm (GI), and 2.48 mm (GII). No patient approached the
50% diameter stenosis at 1 year by angiography or IVUS assessment, and no edge restenosis was observed. Neointimal hyperplasia, as detected by IVUS, was virtually absent at 6 months (2±5% obstruction volume, GIII) and at 12 months (GI=2±5% and GII=2±3%).
Conclusions This study demonstrates a sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents 1 year after implantation.
Key Words: angiography drugs stents restenosis ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 1996
The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether sirolimus-eluting stents produce a sustained suppression of the neointimal proliferation over a period of 1 year or merely delay the restenosis process.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 mm in length and vessels
3 and
3.5 mm in diameter were included. Total occlusion, ostial or thrombus containing lesions, unprotected left main disease with >50% stenosis, occurrence of myocardial infarction within the preceding 72 hours, and left ventricular ejection fraction <30% were the major exclusion criteria. Thirty patients were electively treated with two different formulations of sirolimus-eluting stents (fast release [FR], n=15, group I, and slow release [SR], n=15, group II) at the Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil. A third cohort of patients (n=15, group III) was treated with SR sirolimus-eluting stents at the Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Drug-Polymer Matrix and Elution Kinetics
Sirolimus was blended in a mixture of nonerodable polymers, and a 5-µm-thick layer of sirolimus-polymer matrix was applied onto the surface of the Bx VELOCITY stent (Cordis), a laser-cut 316L stainless-steel balloon-expandable stent.
The drug is almost completely eluted by 15 days after implantation in the FR formulation. Another layer of drug-free polymer was applied on top of the drug-polymer matrix to introduce a diffusion barrier and prolong drug release to >28 days in the SR formulation. All stents, regardless of the coating composition, were loaded with a fixed amount of sirolimus per unit of metal surface area (140 µg sirolimus/cm2).
In vivo experiments have shown that sirolimus levels in whole blood peak at 1 hour (2.6±0.7 ng/mL, FR; 0.9±0.2 ng/mL, SR) after implantation and fall below the lower limit of quantification by 72 hours (0.4 ng/mL) (Bruce D. Klugherz, unpublished data, 2000). Taking into account that renal transplant patients maintain chronic blood levels of rapamycin between 8 and 17 ng/mL, the peak blood level after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent is absolutely negligible.
Stent Procedure
Stents were implanted according to standard practice, after balloon predilatation and followed by high-pressure (>12 atmospheres) balloon after dilatation. All stents were 18 mm long and 3 to 3.5 mm in diameter. Heparin was given to maintain the activated clotting time >300 seconds. Patients received aspirin (325 mg/d, indefinitely) started at least 12 hours before the procedure and a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel immediately after stent implantation and 75 mg/d for 60 days. The protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Committees of both institutions, and written informed consent was obtained from every patient.
Angiographic and IVUS Procedures
Patients in São Paulo (groups I and II) underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angiographic follow-up at 4 and 12 months. In Rotterdam (group III), patients returned for repeat angiography and IVUS assessment at 6 months, the classical restenosis time point. Intracoronary nitrates were administered immediately before each angiographic and IVUS acquisition. Postprocedure angiography was performed in at least 2 orthogonal projections, which were repeated at the follow-up studies. Quantitative angiographic analysis was done by an independent core laboratory (Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass).
The segments subject to three-dimensional (3D) IVUS reconstruction were examined with a 30-MHz single-element mechanical transducer (ClearView, CVIS, Boston Scientific Corporation). A constant pullback speed of 0.5 mm/s was used for IVUS image acquisitions. A complete IVUS run was recorded on s-VHS tape for offline 3D reconstruction. At 12 months, IVUS images were also acquired using an ECG-triggered pullback device with a stepping motor at 0.2 mm/step (EchoScan, Tomtec) to assure a precise quantification of neointimal hyperplasia volume. This system acquires images coinciding with the peak of the R wave, eliminating the artifacts caused by the movement of the heart during the cardiac cycle and ultimately improving the quality of image for 3D volumetric quantification. Volumetric IVUS analysis was carried out by an independent core laboratory (Cardialysis BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands).6,7
Quantitative Measurements
Two coronary segments were subjected to quantitative angiography, in-stent and in-lesion segments. The in-stent analysis encompassed only the 18-mm-long segment covered by the stent. The in-lesion segment was defined as the stent plus 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the edge or the nearest side branch. In-stent and in-lesion restenosis was defined as
50% diameter stenosis (DS) at follow-up, located within the stent and target lesion, respectively. Edge restenosis was defined as
50% DS at follow-up, located at the proximal or distal edge. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent DS were calculated for each segment.
Quantitative IVUS analyses of the stent segment were performed at all time points. Lumen and stent boundaries were detected using a minimum-cost algorithm. Total stent and lumen volumes were calculated as previously described. Intimal hyperplasia (IH) volume was calculated as stent volume minus luminal volume. Feasibility, reproducibility, and interobserver and intraobserver variability of these measurements have been validated previously.8
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD. Comparisons between postintervention and follow-up measurements were performed with a 2-tailed paired t test. Comparisons between groups were performed using unpaired Students t test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the Thoraxcenter, 1 of the 15 patients died on day 2 of a cerebral hemorrhage. She had received abciximab during the procedure and for 12 hours thereafter. Two additional patients (group III) suffered a vessel occlusion during or immediately after the procedure attributable to distal edge dissection and were successfully treated with additional stenting. Subsequent clinical follow-up was uneventful for both patients, and no restenosis was detected at 6-month angiographic follow-up. Finally, 1 asymptomatic patient from Rotterdam refused repeat angiography; thus, 13 completed 6-month angiographic and IVUS follow-up. As reported previously,2 all patients in groups I and II were discharged without any clinical event. One asymptomatic patient (group II) refused repeat angiography at 12 months.
A representative sequence of angiograms from a single patient are shown in Figure 1. Preprocedure reference vessel diameter (RD) was 2.85±0.46 mm, and postprocedure MLD was 2.47±0.38-mm (in-lesion) and 2.9±0.27-mm (in-stent) in the Rotterdam patients (group III). Four-month data from groups I and II have been reported previously.2 One-year in-stent MLD (group I, 2.73±0.3 mm; group II, 2.87±0.4 mm) and percent DS (group I, 8.9±6.1%; group II, 6.7±7%) remained essentially unchanged compared with 4-month follow-up. At 6 months (group III), in-stent MLD was 2.66±0.3 mm, and percent DS was 8.9±7.6% (P=NS compared with postprocedure) Changes in in-lesion MLD and percent DS are shown in Figure 2. At 12 months, in-lesion angiographic lumen dimension showed a small decrease compared with postprocedure in both groups (Figure 2, P<0.01). Between 4 months and 12 months, a very small decrease, albeit statically significant (P=0.004), in in-lesion MLD was observed in group I. No patient approached the
50% DS at 1-year by angiography or IVUS assessment, and no edge restenosis was observed.
|
|
At 6-month follow-up, lumen volume was 156.7±63.6 mm3 (versus 156.5±64.1 mm3 at postprocedure, P=NS) and intimal hyperplasia volume was 5.7±17.7 mm3 (group III). Thus, the percent obstruction volume was 2±4.98%, similar to the results reported at 4 months in the patients from São Paulo.2
One-year volumetric IVUS data (Figure 3) from the São Paulo patients were actually better than those reported previously at 4-month follow-up.2 Only 2 patients had >10% IH after 12 months (Figure 3). Differences in the method of volumetric quantification probably explain these findings. As a result of the virtual absence of neointimal hyperplasia, the automated contour detection algorithm that was used for the original analysis superimposed the contours of the stent and lumen boundaries in the majority of the cases. Thus, the core laboratory analyst used a "copy and shrink" tool of the quantitative analysis software to dissociate the two contours. This action led to an overestimation of the amount of IH. At 12-month follow-up analysis, the lumen and stent contours were not dissociated artificially, unless IH was clearly visualized. To compare 4-month and 12-month IVUS data, the core laboratory reanalyzed the 4-month IVUS images using the same methodology used at 12 months (Table).
|
|
In one patient (group I), 12-month IVUS assessment showed an unstable plaque proximal to the stent. Lesion vulnerability was characterized by positive vessel remodeling and a large lipid pool delimited by a thin fibrous cap (Figure 4). This preexisting plaque increased progressively from the time of the initial procedure, producing a linear deterioration in lumen dimensions (MLD was 2.85 mm postprocedure, 2.51 mm at 4 months, and 2.02 mm at 12 months). No sign of thrombus was detected by angiography or IVUS. At 12 months, the patient was asymptomatic and had a negative stress test. However, at 14-month follow-up, he returned with a nonQ-wave myocardial infarction. Angiography showed the target vessel occluded proximal to the stent, and repeat angioplasty was performed.
|
The remaining 29 patients of the first 2 cohorts (groups I and II) have now completed 15-month clinical follow-up uneventfully. Similarly, the 14 Rotterdam patients were asymptomatic, with no additional adverse events up to 9 months after the index procedure.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lack of restenosis observed in this first series of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents is probably a consequence of the scaffolding properties of the stent as well as the potent cytostatic effect of sirolimus.9,10 Like cyclosporin A and tacrolimus (FK506), sirolimus binds to specific cytosolic proteins. However, the mechanism of action of sirolimus is distinct from other immunosuppressive agents that act solely by inhibiting DNA synthesis. The sirolimus:FKBP complex binds to a specific cell-cycle regulatory protein, the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), and inhibits its activation.11 The inhibition of mTOR induces cell-cycle arrest in late G1 phase.1214 The upregulation of FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP12) observed in human neointimal smooth muscle cells additionally supports the potential antirestenotic effect of sirolimus.15 Preclinical data have demonstrated the efficacy of both systemic13,16 and local administration (via drug-eluting stent) (Andrew J. Carter, unpublished data, 2000) of sirolimus in reducing neointimal hyperplasia in different models of restenosis.
A concern about potential late complications, such as late thrombosis, associated with new therapies is a legacy from our previous experience with intracoronary radiation therapy.17 In our series, one patient (out of 44) experienced a thrombotic event involving the target coronary artery 14 months after the procedure. It is important to note that IVUS showed an unstable plaque located proximal to the stent that grew progressively in size over the period of observation. The relationship between unstable plaque, as characterized by IVUS, and coronary thrombosis has been reported previously and may explain this unexpected event.18,19 Experimental investigations have shown a similar degree of re-endothelialization between bare and sirolimus-coated stents occurring as early as 30 days after implantation (Andrew J Carter, unpublished data, 2001), ie, sirolimus does not seem to delay endothelialization. Nevertheless, one cannot completely rule out the possibility of late-stent thrombosis as a cause of vessel occlusion in this case. The occurrence of this somewhat anecdotal event should be interpreted with caution. Data from large randomized multicenter trials, already underway, will be necessary to definitively address this important question.
After our previous study showing a surprising near-absence of IH 4 months after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents,2 the logical question was whether this effect would be permanent or whether it merely represented a delay in the proliferative response. The basis for these concerns is the unexpected late-luminal deterioration observed with catheter-based radiation systems and radioactive stents,1,5 although the mechanisms of action of sirolimus-eluting stents differ considerably from intracoronary brachytherapy. In the present study, angiographic lumen dimensions and IVUS-detected IH volume assessed both at 6-month follow-up (in group III) and at 12 months (groups I and II) was not substantially different from what was observed at 4 months (Table). Thus, at 12-month follow-up, there is no evidence of significant late catch up, and the 12-month IH volume observed in the present study is less than one third of that reported with any previously tested antirestenosis therapy.6,7 If the findings of the present investigation are confirmed by large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, this technology is likely to have a major impact on the treatment of coronary artery disease in the near future.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Grube, K. D. Dawkins, G. Guagliumi, A. P. Banning, K. Zmudka, A. Colombo, L. Thuesen, K. Hauptman, J. Marco, W. Wijns, et al. TAXUS VI 2-year follow-up: randomized comparison of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting with bare metal stents for treatment of long, complex lesions Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2578 - 2582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kanemitsu, K. Tanaka, J. Tanaka, H. Suzuki, and T. Kinoshita Initial clinical impact of drug eluting stents on coronary artery bypass graft surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2007; 6(5): 632 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, Y. Bai, L. Qin, P. Zhang, T. Yi, S. A. Teesdale, L. Zhao, J. S. Pober, and G. Tellides Interferon-{gamma} Induces Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Intimal Expansion by Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Dependent Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Raptor Complex 1 Activation Circ. Res., September 14, 2007; 101(6): 560 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Awata, J.-i. Kotani, M. Uematsu, T. Morozumi, T. Watanabe, T. Onishi, O. Iida, F. Sera, S. Nanto, M. Hori, et al. Serial Angioscopic Evidence of Incomplete Neointimal Coverage After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison With Bare-Metal Stents Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 910 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Daemen and P. W. Serruys Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part I: A Survey of Current and Future Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Meaningful Advances or More of the Same? Circulation, July 17, 2007; 116(3): 316 - 328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Menichelli, A. Parma, E. Pucci, R. Fiorilli, F. De Felice, M. Nazzaro, A. Giulivi, D. Alborino, A. Azzellino, and R. Violini Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SESAMI) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 15, 2007; 49(19): 1924 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tellides and J. S. Pober Interferon-{gamma} Axis in Graft Arteriosclerosis Circ. Res., March 16, 2007; 100(5): 622 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Elezi, A. Dibra, J. Mehilli, J. Pache, R. Wessely, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Vessel Size and Outcome After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: Results From a Large Cohort of Patients Treated With Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1304 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Suttorp, G. J. Laarman, B. M. Rahel, J. C. Kelder, M. A.R. Bosschaert, F. Kiemeneij, J. M. ten Berg, E. T. Bal, B. J. Rensing, F. D. Eefting, et al. Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries II (PRISON II): A Randomized Comparison of Bare Metal Stent Implantation With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Total Coronary Occlusions Circulation, August 29, 2006; 114(9): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz and N. J. Weissman Intravascular Ultrasound in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 421 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Boyle, S. P. Schulman, and J. M. Hare Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiac Repair: Ready for the Next Step Circulation, July 25, 2006; 114(4): 339 - 352. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A N Seale, P E F Daubeney, A G Magee, and M L Rigby Pulmonary vein stenosis: initial experience with cutting balloon angioplasty Heart, June 1, 2006; 92(6): 815 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Roiron, P Sanchez, A Bouzamondo, P Lechat, and G Montalescot Drug eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 641 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Rodriguez, J. F. Granada, M. Rodriguez-Alemparte, C. F. Vigo, J. Delgado, C. Fernandez-Pereira, A. Pocovi, A. M. Rodriguez-Granillo, D. Schulz, A. E. Raizner, et al. Oral Rapamycin After Coronary Bare-Metal Stent Implantation to Prevent Restenosis: The Prospective, Randomized Oral Rapamycin in Argentina (ORAR II) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1522 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Weisz, M. B. Leon, D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, M. R. Clark, B. M. Cohen, S. G. Ellis, P. Coleman, C. Hill, C. Shi, et al. Two-Year Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Results From the Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in de Novo Native Coronary Lesions (SIRIUS) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1350 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Muhs, P. J. Gagne, T. Maldonado, and P. Sheehan Minimally invasive revascularization strategies for chronic lower limb ischemia. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 35 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Lee, H.-C. Tan, and Y.-T. Lim Update on Drug-Eluting Stents for Prevention of Restenosis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, February 1, 2006; 14(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, M. J. Kern, S. B. King III, D. A. Morrison, W. W. O'Neill, H. V. Schaff, P. L. Whitlow, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 216 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, M. J. Kern, S. B. King III, D. A. Morrison, W. W. O'Neill, H. V. Schaff, P. L. Whitlow, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 156 - 175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Alvarez Jr and N. K. Kapur Drug Eluting Stent Technology: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment and Prevention of Restenosis Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2005; 18(6): 461 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Morton, N. D. Arnold, J. Gunn, R. Varcoe, S. E. Francis, S. K. Dower, and D. C. Crossman Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist alters the response to vessel wall injury in a porcine coronary artery model Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2005; 68(3): 493 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Iofina, P W Radke, P Skurzewski, P K Haager, R Blindt, K-C Koch, P Hanrath, J vom Dahl, and R Hoffmann Superiority of sirolimus eluting stent compared with intracoronary {beta} radiation for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1584 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Sarbassov and D. M. Sabatini Redox Regulation of the Nutrient-sensitive Raptor-mTOR Pathway and Complex J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 39505 - 39509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Liu, A. Howes, J. Lesperance, W. B. Stallcup, C. A. Hauser, K. Kadoya, R. G. Oshima, and R. T. Abraham Antitumor Activity of Rapamycin in a Transgenic Mouse Model of ErbB2-Dependent Human Breast Cancer Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5325 - 5336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Hata, J. A. Petrofski, J. N. Schroder, M. L. Williams, S. H. Timberlake, A. Pippen, M. T. Corwin, A. K. Solan, A. Jakoi, T. R. Gehrig, et al. Modulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling reduces intimal hyperplasia in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2005; 129(6): 1405 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-J. Neumann, W. Desmet, E. Grube, J. Brachmann, P. Presbitero, P. Rubartelli, A. Mugge, F. Di Pede, D. Fullgraf, W. Aengevaeren, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Restenosis After Coronary Stent Placement Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2107 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. van Domburg, P. A. Lemos, J. J.M. Takkenberg, T. K.K. Liu, L. A. van Herwerden, C. A. Arampatzis, P. C. Smits, J. Daemen, A. C. Venema, P. W. Serruys, et al. The impact of the introduction of drug-eluting stents on the clinical practice of surgical and percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 675 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fajadet, M.-C. Morice, C. Bode, P. Barragan, P. W. Serruys, W. Wijns, C. R. Constantini, J.-L. Guermonprez, H. Eltchaninoff, D. Blanchard, et al. Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit With Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Three-Year Results of the RAVEL Trial Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): 1040 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukui, S. Takanashi, and Y. Hosoda Coronary Endarterectomy and Stent Removal in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 558 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Huang, X.-L. Niu, A. M. Pippen, B. H. Annex, and C. D. Kontos Adenovirus-Mediated Intraarterial Delivery of PTEN Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(2): 354 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|