| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;104:429.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif.
Correspondence to Karlman Wasserman, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St, Box 405, Torrance, CA 90509-2910. E-mail kwasserm{at}ucla.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We retrospectively evaluated 53 PPH patients who had right heart catheterization and cycle ergometer CPET studies to maximum tolerance as part of their clinical workups. No adverse events occurred during CPET. Reductions in peak O2 uptake (
O2), anaerobic threshold, peak O2 pulse, rate of increase in
O2, and ventilatory efficiency were consistently found. NYHA class correlated well with the above parameters of aerobic function and ventilatory efficiency but less well with resting pulmonary hemodynamics.
Conclusions Patients with PPH can safely undergo noninvasive cycle ergometer CPET to their maximal tolerance. The CPET abnormalities were consistent and characteristic and correlated well with NYHA class.
Key Words: oxygen hypertension, pulmonary ventilation exercise hemodynamics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with gas exchange has the potential of noninvasively grading the severity of exercise limitation, quantifying the hypoperfusion of the lung and systemic circulation, and assessing responses to therapy4,5 before overt right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension are evident at rest.
The objective of the present study was to quantify the exercise abnormalities in aerobic function and ventilatory efficiency in PPH patients and to relate them to traditional measurements, such as resting hemodynamics and New York Heart Association (NYHA) symptom class.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurements
Right heart catheterization with standard hemodynamic measurements was performed within 1 month of each patients CPET study. Just before their CPET studies, patients had standard pulmonary function tests.
Each patient performed a physician-supervised, standard, progressively increasing work rate (WR) CPET to maximum tolerance on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer. Gas exchange measurements (Cardiopulmonary Metabolic Cart, Medical Graphics) were made during 3 minutes of rest, 3 minutes of unloaded leg cycling at 60 rpm followed by a progressively increasing WR exercise of 5 to 15 (10±3) W · min-1 to maximum tolerance, and 2 minutes of recovery.7 Pulse oximetry (SpO2), heart rate (HR), 12-lead ECG, and cuff blood pressure were monitored and recorded.
Minute ventilation (
E, BTPS), O2 uptake (
O2, STPD), CO2 output (
CO2, STPD), and other exercise variables were computer-calculated breath by breath, interpolated second by second, and averaged over 10-second intervals.7,8 The anaerobic threshold (AT), ratio of O2 uptake to WR increase (
O2/
WR), and oxygen pulse (O2 pulse) were determined as previously described.7 Ventilatory efficiency during exercise was expressed as the ratio of ventilation to CO2 output at AT (
E/
CO2@AT)7 and the slope of
E versus
CO2 over the linear component of the plot of
E versus
CO2.9 The rate of
O2 increase during unloaded cycling was expressed as the mean response time (MRT) for a monoexponential curve fit to the second-by-second
O2 measurements during the 3 minutes of unloaded cycling.10 If the first breath
O2 equaled the 3-minute
O2, the MRT was considered equal to the duration of the first breath.
Statistical Analysis
Standard equations were used to predict actual and percent predicted (%Pred) values for maximal voluntary ventilation and CPET parameters.7,11 The predicted value for
E/
CO2@AT was calculated as 24.71-4.04xsex (female=0, male=1)+0.115xage (data from 41 normal subjects). Resting CPET values were compared with their predicted values by using paired 2-tailed t tests. A significant change was defined as an
level of P<0.05. Correlation and regression analyses were performed by ANOVA. Simple individual linear regression analyses were performed by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between individual variables and each of the other variables. Multicolinearity analyses were performed to predict NYHA class by using stepwise regression with an
level of P=0.05 for tolerance level.12,13
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
At cardiac catheterization, all patients had resting pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure 64±18 mm Hg), increased mean right atrial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, reduced CO and cardiac index, and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (Table 1). On echocardiography, all patients had an enlarged right ventricle and/or right atrium, 89% had tricuspid valve regurgitation, and approximately one third had a patent foramen ovale.
All patients completed CPET without incident. Two patients completed only 2 to 3 minutes of unloaded pedaling; the duration of exercise in all others averaged 8±2 (range 3.5 to 14) minutes. All subjects exercised above their ATs; this finding and their high end-exercise respiratory exchange ratio (1.23±0.11) indicate that they had developed a significant metabolic acidosis and had exercised to a heavy, if not maximal, work intensity. The dominant symptoms described for stopping cycle exercise were leg fatigue (49%), dyspnea (43%), palpitations (4%), and light-headedness (2%).
Pattern of Exercise Gas Exchange
The parameters of exercise gas exchange were systematically abnormal in the PPH patients (Table 1). Peak
O2, peak WR, peak O2 pulse or
O2/HR, the ratio of
O2 increase to WR increase (
O2/
WR), AT, and MRT were all moderately to severely reduced. There was a marked increase in the slope of
E versus
CO2 and a moderate decrease in peak HR in all patients. Compared with the control group, the differences between actual and predicted values for all of these variables were significant (P<0.0001) (Table 1). The typical abnormal pattern of CPET findings for 2 PPH patients, 1 with moderate and 1 with severe exercise limitation, and a normal control subject are shown in Figure 1. The exercise pathophysiology is reflected in the reduced peak
O2, AT, 
O2/
WR, and peak O2 pulse and high
E/
CO2.
|
Correlations
Table 2 summarizes multiple correlations between CPET and other variables. NYHA class was significantly correlated with exercise parameters of aerobic function and ventilatory efficiency and better with %Pred values than either per kilogram or absolute values. NYHA class was significantly, but weakly, correlated with resting CO and pulmonary vascular resistance but not with pulmonary artery pressure. Peak WR, AT, and O2 pulse (
O2/HR), slope of
E versus
CO2, and
E/
CO2@AT were also significantly correlated with NYHA class ( P<0.01 to P<0.0001 for all) (Table 2).
|
Peak
O2 and
E/
CO2@AT correlated well with NYHA class (P<0.0001) (Figure 2). Peak
O2 and
O2/HR also correlated well with AT (P<0.0001, Figure 2), showing that the latter can be used as a submaximal parameter for grading aerobic function. The good correlation between peak
O2/HR and AT suggests that the latter is highly influenced by stroke volume (SV).
|
The MRT of
O2 for PPH patients during unloaded cycling exercise averaged 48±17 seconds versus 14±9 seconds for the control subjects (P<0.0001) (Figure 3). MRT was positively correlated with NYHA class and negatively correlated with peak
O2, AT, and peak O2 pulse (all P<0.001).
|
By use of stepwise regression analysis of multiple factors, NYHA class could be estimated from peak
O2 (%Pred) and the slope of
E versus
CO2 (%Pred) (R=0.64, P<0.0001).
Physiological Severity of PPH
The physiological responses to exercise were abnormal in all patients. Table 3 categorizes the PPH patients into 4 groups on the basis of the severity of reduction in their %Pred peak
O2 rather than the less discriminating gradations in NYHA class or pulmonary hemodynamic data. By use of this method of grading disease severity, there is virtually no overlap in any of the key parameters of aerobic function (peak
O2, AT, 
O2/
WR, peak O2 pulse, and MRT of
O2) or ventilatory efficiency (
E/
CO2@AT and slope of
E versus
CO2) when the control subjects and the PPH patients of mildest severity are compared. Peak
E became a lesser fraction of the actual maximal voluntary ventilation as disease severity increased.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
E) to exercise is tightly related to CO2 output (
CO2).9,11,14,15 In PPH, the ventilation of underperfused alveoli causes an increase in dead space ventilation, manifested by a hyperbolic increase in
E relative to the
CO2 increase during exercise. In addition, the lactic acidosis at low WRs and hypoxemia can act as additional stimuli to breathing7 and contribute to the sensation of dyspnea in PPH patients, even though their peak
E was well below their maximal voluntary ventilation. Concurrently, the inability to adequately increase pulmonary (and therefore systemic) blood flow during exercise results in the failure to meet the exercise O2 requirement.
A brief description of 5 parameters of aerobic function (peak
O2, peak O2 pulse, AT, 
O2/
WR, and MRT) that reflect the inability of pulmonary blood flow to increase adequately in PPH patients follows.
Peak
O2
Peak
O2 assesses the subjects maximal work ability and the maximal ability of the circulatory system to increase CO. In PPH, this relates to the pulmonary vasculopathy, which limits blood flow through the lung (and thus through the body).
Peak O2 Pulse
From the Fick principle,
O2 equals COxC(a-
)O2. C(a-
)O2 denotes content difference between arterial and mixed venous blood. Because CO is the product of HR and SV, dividing both sides of the Fick equation by HR discloses that the O2 pulse (
O2/HR) at any given time equals SVxC(a-
)O2. As noted previously,1618 a low peak O2 pulse usually indicates a low peak SV.
Anaerobic Threshold
The AT, which describes the highest
O2 that the patient can sustain without developing a lactic acidosis, appears to be an independent marker of PPH severity.

O2/
WR

O2/
WR also characterizes PPH severity7 (Table 3). Values progressively lower than 10 mL/min per watt disclose a higher than normal dependence on anaerobic metabolism and, therefore, a decreased ability to aerobically satisfy high-energy phosphate requirements.
Mean Response Time
The MRT of
O2 for constant WR exercise depends on the rate of increase of pulmonary blood flow at the start of exercise.10 Because our patients were so exercise limited, the kinetics, even for unloaded cycling, were markedly slower than that for our normal subjects, with the latter achieving steady-state
O2 values within 15 seconds on average (Figure 3).
Abnormalities in Exercise Physiology in PPH Patients and Basis of Symptoms
On the basis of our CPET findings, the mechanisms that might account for the most common symptoms in PPH patients (dyspnea and/or fatigue with exercise) can be better understood (Figure 4).
|
Dyspnea
The finding of an increased ventilatory response to exercise appears to be a uniform finding in PPH patients (Table 3). Their dyspnea can be attributed to at least 3 mechanisms that increase ventilatory drive relative to metabolism (Figure 4, left branch).
The first is ventilation/perfusion mismatching, resulting in an increased ratio of dead space volume to tidal volume that is due to hypoperfusion of ventilated alveoli.1,15,19 The second mechanism is the increased hydrogen ion (H+) stimulus to ventilation resulting from a low WR lactic acidosis (low AT). This stimulates
E, not only from the increase in H+ that is due to the decrease in HCO3- but also from the increase in
CO2 that is due to the dissociation of a large amount of HCO3- as it buffers the newly formed lactic acid. The third mechanism, present in many of our patients, is arterial hypoxemia, which is due to a reduced pulmonary capillary bed with shortened red blood cell transit times or to a right to left shunt through a patent foramen ovale. The hypoxemic (shunted) blood entering the systemic arterial circulation stimulates ventilation profoundly because it has not only a low PO2 but also a high PCO2 and high H+ concentration.
Fatigue
In PPH, aerobic regeneration of ATP is impaired, with more work being done anaerobically at relatively low WRs, as reflected by the reduced peak
O2, AT, and 
O2/
WR in our patients (Figure 4, right branch). Because the mechanism of anaerobic ATP regeneration stimulates anaerobic glycolysis, a prominent lactic acidosis results. Probably the most important mechanism leading to muscle fatigue in PPH is the reduction in the rate of aerobic regeneration of ATP.
Light-Headedness
The light-headedness with exercise that some PPH patients experience is probably related to their inability to adequately maintain CO and systemic blood pressure with exercise and/or sudden arterial hypoxemia via a patent foramen ovale.
Resting Pulmonary Hemodynamics in PPH Patients
There were significant but modest correlations between resting CO and pulmonary vascular resistance with NYHA class and several of the CPET measures of aerobic function (Table 2). Cardiac catheterization is invasive and carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality in PPH,3,4,20 although it is essential in making the diagnosis. In contrast, CPET measures of aerobic function and gas exchange efficiency might be better for determining disease severity and tracking the clinical course, especially in view of the better correlations of these measures with NYHA symptom class.
Grading of Physiological Impairment in PPH
All of the CPET parameters of aerobic function and gas exchange efficiency in our patients correlated well with their NYHA symptom class. Because NYHA class correlated best with %Pred peak
O2, we chose the latter parameter to physiologically grade the impairment in PPH (Table 3), as did Weber et al18 for chronic heart failure. The absence of overlap in the predicted peak
O2 of our PPH patients (18 to 75 %Pred) and our 20 control subjects (82 to 132 %Pred) (Table 3) indicates the discriminating power of CPET even in "mild" PPH. Two thirds of our PPH patients had peak
O2 levels of <50% predicated value, a level associated with a 60% 2-year mortality in patients with chronic left heart failure.21
Peak O2 pulse and AT decreased in parallel fashion within the grading established by the peak
O2 in our patients (Table 3). Because O2 pulse equals SVxC(a-
)O2, the progressively decreasing peak O2 pulse likely reflects a progressive reduction in peak SV paralleling disease severity. The AT becomes a higher fraction of peak
O2 as disease severity (peak
O2) worsens, suggesting a decrease in cardiovascular reserve as PPH worsens (Table 3).
Conclusions
The pathophysiological CPET findings that we have described in PPH appear to be consistent and characteristic. CPET is of great potential value for evaluating patients with dyspnea and fatigue safely, reproducibly, and noninvasively.8,22,23 It may become as useful in assessing the prognosis of PPH patients as it has been in patients with chronic heart failure,11,23 or it may be used for the purpose of prioritizing patients for lung transplantation and for evaluating drug therapy.4,5 The need to categorize disease severity accurately and noninvasively in PPH patients makes it desirable that physicians responsible for diagnosis and management of these patients become familiar with CPET and the information that can be derived from it.
Received March 16, 2001; revision received May 11, 2001; accepted May 14, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Rubin LJ. Current concepts: primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 111117.
3. Rich S, Dantzker DR, Ayres SM, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension: a national prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 107: 216223.
4.
Wensel R, Opitz CF, Ewert R, et al. Effects of iloprost inhalation on exercise capacity and ventilatory efficiency in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2000; 101: 23882392.
5.
Wax D, Garofano R, Barst RJ. Effects of long-term infusion of prostacyclin on exercise performance in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 1999; 116: 914920.
6. Rich S. Executive summary from the World Symposium on primary pulmonary hypertension 1998. World Health Organization website. Available at: www.who.int/ncd/cvd/pph.html.
7. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, et al. Principles of the Exercise Testing and Interpretation. 3rd ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 1999.
8.
Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting the anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol. 1986; 60: 20202027.
9. Metra M, Dei Cas L, Panina G, et al. Exercise hyperventilation in chronic congestive heart failure, and its relation to functional capacity and hemodynamics. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70: 622628.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Sietsema KE, Daly JA, Wasserman K. Early dynamics of O2 uptake and heart rate as affected by exercise rate. J Appl Physiol. 1989; 67: 25352541.
11.
Kleber FX, Vietzke G, Wernecke KD, et al. Impairment of ventilatory efficiency in heart failure: prognostic impact. Circulation. 2000; 101: 28032809.
12. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc; 2000.
13. Glantz SA, Slinker BK. Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. San Francisco, Calif: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1990.
14.
Wasserman K, Van Kessel A, Burton GB. Interaction of physiological mechanisms during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1967; 22: 7185.
15.
Ting H, Sun XG, Chuang ML, et al. A noninvasive assessment of pulmonary perfusion abnormality in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2000; 119: 824832.
16.
Sun XG, Hansen JE, Ting H, et al. Comparison of exercise cardiac output by the Fick principle using O2 and CO2. Chest. 2000; 118: 631640.
17.
Stringer WW, Hansen JE, Wasserman K. Cardiac output estimated noninvasively from oxygen uptake during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1997; 82: 908912.
18.
Weber KT, Kinasewitz GT, Janicki JS, et al. Oxygen utilization and ventilation during exercise in patients with chronic cardiac failure. Circulation. 1982; 65: 12131223.
19.
DAlonzo GE, Bower JS, Dantzker DR. Differentiation of patients with primary and thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 1984; 85: 457464.
20. Rhodes J, Barst RJ, Garofano RP, et al. Hemodynamic correlates of exercise function in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 17381744.[Abstract]
21. Stelken AM, Younis LT, Jennison SH, et al. Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing using percent achieved of predicted peak oxygen uptake for patients with ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 345352.[Abstract]
22. Meyer K, Westbrook S, Schwaibold M, et al. Short term reproducibility of cardiopulmonary measurements during exercise testing in patients with severe heart failure. Am Heart J. 1997; 134: 2026.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Fleg JL, Piña IL, Balady GJ, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research application: an advisory from the committee on exercise, rehabilitation, and prevention, council on clinical cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000; 102: 15911597.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Peacock, R. Naeije, N. Galie, and L. Rubin End-points and clinical trial design in pulmonary arterial hypertension: have we made progress? Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2009; 34(1): 231 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. V. McLaughlin, D. B. Badesch, M. Delcroix, T. R. Fleming, S. P. Gaine, N. Galie, J. S. R. Gibbs, N. H. Kim, R. J. Oudiz, A. Peacock, et al. End Points and Clinical Trial Design in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1 Suppl): S97 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Magri, M. Brioschi, C. Banfi, J. P. Schmid, P. Palermo, M. Contini, A. Apostolo, M. Bussotti, E. Tremoli, S. Sciomer, et al. Circulating Plasma Surfactant Protein Type B as Biological Marker of Alveolar-Capillary Barrier Damage in Chronic Heart Failure Circ Heart Fail, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 175 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Smith, J. T. Reyes, J. L. Russell, and T. Humpl Safety of Maximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Chest, May 1, 2009; 135(5): 1209 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Faoro, S. Boldingh, M. Moreels, S. Martinez, M. Lamotte, P. Unger, S. Brimioulle, S. Huez, and R. Naeije Bosentan Decreases Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Improves Exercise Capacity in Acute Hypoxia Chest, May 1, 2009; 135(5): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Oudiz and L. J. Rubin Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A New Addition to the Spectrum of Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Circulation, November 18, 2008; 118(21): 2120 - 2121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Tolle, A. B. Waxman, T. L. Van Horn, P. P. Pappagianopoulos, and D. M. Systrom Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Circulation, November 18, 2008; 118(21): 2183 - 2189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Provencher, P. Herve, O. Sitbon, M. Humbert, G. Simonneau, and D. Chemla Changes in exercise haemodynamics during treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2008; 32(2): 393 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(Suppl_1): i1 - i41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland Thorax, March 1, 2008; 63(Suppl_2): ii1 - ii41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Naeije and S. Huez Right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension: physiological concepts Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H5 - H9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Lang Management of acute and chronic RV dysfunction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H61 - H67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Oudiz, G. Roveran, J. E. Hansen, X.-G. Sun, and K. Wasserman Effect of sildenafil on ventilatory efficiency and exercise tolerance in pulmonary hypertension Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 917 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hoeper, M. W. Pletz, H. Golpon, and T. Welte Prognostic value of blood gas analyses in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 944 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Alkotob, P. Soltani, M. A. Sheatt, M. C. Katsetos, N. Rothfield, W. D. Hager, R. J. Foley, and D. I. Silverman Reduced exercise capacity and stress-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with scleroderma. Chest, July 1, 2006; 130(1): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dimopoulos, D. O. Okonko, G.-P. Diller, C. S. Broberg, T. V. Salukhe, S. V. Babu-Narayan, W. Li, A. Uebing, S. Bayne, R. Wensel, et al. Abnormal Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Relates to Cyanosis and Predicts Survival Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): 2796 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Holverda, C. T.-J. Gan, J. T. Marcus, P. E. Postmus, A. Boonstra, and A. Vonk-Noordegraaf Impaired Stroke Volume Response to Exercise in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1732 - 1733. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Provencher, D. Chemla, P. Herve, O. Sitbon, M. Humbert, and G. Simonneau Heart rate responses during the 6-minute walk test in pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 114 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deboeck, G. Niset, J-L. Vachiery, J-J. Moraine, and R. Naeije Physiological response to the six-minute walk test in pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 667 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chaouat, A.-S. Bugnet, N. Kadaoui, R. Schott, I. Enache, A. Ducolone, M. Ehrhart, R. Kessler, and E. Weitzenblum Severe Pulmonary Hypertension and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2005; 172(2): 189 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yasunobu, R. J. Oudiz, X.-G. Sun, J. E. Hansen, and K. Wasserman End-tidal PCO2 Abnormality and Exercise Limitation in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1637 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Naeije Breathing more with weaker respiratory muscles in pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 6 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Meyer, D. Lossnitzer, A. V. Kristen, A. M. Schoene, W. Kubler, H. A. Katus, and M. M. Borst Respiratory muscle dysfunction in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 125 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Hansen, X.-G. Sun, Y. Yasunobu, R. P. Garafano, G. Gates, R. J. Barst, and K. Wasserman Reproducibility of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Measurements in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 816 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Leuchte, C. Neurohr, R. Baumgartner, M. Holzapfel, W. Giehrl, M. Vogeser, and J. Behr Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Exercise Capacity in Lung Fibrosis and Pulmonary Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2004; 170(4): 360 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Rubin and R. Naeije Sildenafil for Enhanced Performance at High Altitude? Ann Intern Med, August 3, 2004; 141(3): 233 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. McGoon, D. Gutterman, V. Steen, R. Barst, D. C. McCrory, T. A. Fortin, and J. E. Loyd Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1_suppl): 14S - 34S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Barst, M. McGoon, A. Torbicki, O. Sitbon, M. J. Krowka, H. Olschewski, and S. Gaine Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 16, 2004; 43(12_Suppl_S): 40S - 47S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hoeper, R. J. Oudiz, A. Peacock, V. F. Tapson, S. G. Haworth, A. E. Frost, and A. Torbicki End points and clinical trial designs in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Clinical and regulatory perspectives J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 16, 2004; 43(12_Suppl_S): 48S - 55S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Peacock, R. Naeije, N. Galie, and J.T. Reeves End points in pulmonary arterial hypertension: the way forward Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 947 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deboeck, G. Niset, M. Lamotte, J-L. Vachiery, and R. Naeije Exercise testing in pulmonary arterial hypertension and in chronic heart failure Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2004; 23(5): 747 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Leuchte, M. Holzapfel, R. A. Baumgartner, I. Ding, C. Neurohr, M. Vogeser, T. Kolbe, M. Schwaiblmair, and J. Behr Clinical significance of brain natriuretic peptide in primary pulmonary hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 764 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W Mikhail, S. K Prasad, W. Li, P. Rogers, A. H Chester, S. Bayne, D. Stephens, M. Khan, J.S.R Gibbs, T. W Evans, et al. Clinical and haemodynamic effects of sildenafil in pulmonary hypertension: acute and mid-term effects Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2004; 25(5): 431 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Glaser, C. F. Opitz, U. Bauer, R. Wensel, R. Ewert, P. E. Lange, and F. X. Kleber Assessment of Symptoms and Exercise Capacity in Cyanotic Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 368 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.M. Hoeper, N. Taha, A. Bekjarova, R. Gatzke, and E. Spiekerkoetter Bosentan treatment in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension receiving nonparenteral prostanoids Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2003; 22(2): 330 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-G. Sun, J. E. Hansen, R. J. Oudiz, and K. Wasserman Pulmonary function in primary pulmonary hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 1028 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2003; 167(2): 211 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-G. Sun, J. E. Hansen, N. Garatachea, T. W. Storer, and K. Wasserman Ventilatory Efficiency during Exercise in Healthy Subjects Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2002; 166(11): 1443 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chemla, V. Castelain, P. Herve, Y. Lecarpentier, and S. Brimioulle Haemodynamic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2002; 20(5): 1314 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Nagaya, Y Shimizu, T Satoh, H Oya, M Uematsu, S Kyotani, F Sakamaki, N Sato, N Nakanishi, and K Miyatake Oral beraprost sodium improves exercise capacity and ventilatory efficiency in patients with primary or thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Heart, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 340 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-G. Sun, J. E. Hansen, R. J. Oudiz, and K. Wasserman Gas Exchange Detection of Exercise-Induced Right-to-Left Shunt in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Circulation, January 1, 2002; 105(1): 54 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |