(Circulation. 2001;104:976.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Reprint requests to Jae K. Oh, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail oh.jae{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We studied 10 patients (8 men; mean age, 64±7 years) with surgically confirmed CP. Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure early and late diastolic transmitral flow velocities. Tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure E'. PCWP was measured with right heart catheterization. All patients were in sinus rhythm. Mean E and E' were 91±15 cm/s and 11±4 cm/s, respectively. Mean PCWP was 25±6 mm Hg. E' was positively correlated with PCWP (r=0.69, P=0.027). There was a significant inverse correlation between E/E' and PCWP (r=-0.74, P=0.014). Despite high left ventricular filling pressures, E/E' (mean, 9±4) was <15 in all but 1 patient.
Conclusions Paradoxical to the positive correlation between E/E' and PCWP in patients with myocardial disease, an inverse relationship was found in patients with CP.
Key Words: pericarditis pressure mitral valve
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 days (Table). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
|
Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography
Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examinations were performed in a standard manner with a commercially available cardiac ultrasound unit. A pulsed-wave Doppler study of mitral inflow velocity was performed with simultaneous respiratory recording from a nasal thermistor, as described previously (Figure 1). 6,7 The first cardiac cycles in which filling and ejection occurred in their entirety during a particular respiratory phase (either inspiration or expiration) were analyzed. Three respiratory cycles were analyzed for each patient. For tissue Doppler echocardiography measurements, the specialized pulsed-wave Doppler mode for tissue velocity was used, and the Nyquist limit was adjusted to a range of 15 to 20 cm/s. Gains were minimized to allow for a clear tissue signal with minimal background noise. From the apical 4-chamber view, a 2- to 5-mm sample volume was placed at the septal corner of the mitral annulus to record annular velocities (Figure 1). All Doppler velocities were recorded with a chart recorder at a sweep speed of 50 or 100 mm/s.
|
Cardiac Catheterization
Right and left heart catheterization was performed to measure pulmonary artery or capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and LV diastolic pressure. A 6-F, balloon-tipped, flow-directed pulmonary arterial catheter was placed through a femoral vein into the pulmonary artery under fluoroscopic guidance. With the balloon inflated, the catheter was advanced into the pulmonary capillary wedge position, which was confirmed fluoroscopically by the presence of characteristic pressure waveforms and by a saturation of >95%. LV pressure was recorded with a 7-F, high-fidelity, manometer-tipped catheter (Millar Instruments, Inc), as described previously.8 LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was measured from the LV pressure tracing at the point just before the onset of an increase in LV systolic pressure. Averaged values of
3 consecutive beats were used for statistical analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The assessment of LV filling pressure is clinically important in patients with established heart disease and usually requires invasive hemodynamic measurement. Several noninvasive Doppler echocardiographic indices that use conventional mitral inflow parameters have been proposed to estimate LV filling pressure.911 Because E is directly influenced by left atrial pressure and inversely altered by changes in the time constant of relaxation, an increase in left atrial pressure can override the effects of impaired relaxation.
Recently, combining E with E' has been proposed as a tool for assessing LV filling pressures. Several investigators have shown that the E/E' ratio is valid for determining LV filling pressures by offsetting the effects of relaxation on E in estimating filling pressures. Nagueh et al validated the relationship between E/E' and PCWP in patients with either impaired or pseudonormal relaxation2 or with sinus tachycardia.3 Ommen et al4 found that an E/E' >15 identified increased LV filling pressure. In addition, they showed that E/E' provided better estimates of LV filling pressures than pulmonary venous flow pattern or the Valsalva maneuver. However, these studies did not include patients with CP.
In CP, E' is usually well preserved or even accentuated, despite increased filling pressures, and the finding of preserved E' has been suggested as being clinically useful for distinguishing CP from restrictive cardiomyopathy.5 In this study, a significant inverse correlation was found between E/E' and LV filling pressures in patients with CP, which is the inverse of the correlation shown in patients with a primary myocardial disease. The plausible explanation for this finding is the exaggerated longitudinal motion of the mitral annulus, despite high filling pressures in patients with CP, because the lateral expansion of the entire heart is limited by the constricting pericardium. The more severe constriction with a higher filling pressure, the more accentuated is the longitudinal motion of the mitral annulus. This explanation can be supported by the finding that E' was decreased after pericardiectomy in all 3 patients who had a repeat measurement of E' postoperatively. In addition, normal relaxation and a small LV cavity with good systolic function may result in increased longitudinal excursion and E'.
In this study, E' was measured from the septal annulus because its velocity is less influenced by the pericardium. E' from the lateral annulus is usually higher than that of the septal annulus in patients without pericardial abnormality. However, it is potentially affected by the calcification or adhesion of the pericardium in patients with CP.12
Study Limitations
The major limitation of this study is that echocardiographic measurement of E and E' and cardiac catheterization were not performed simultaneously. Therefore, there was a delay in the measurement of intracardiac pressures and PCWP from the measurement of E and E'. However, all patients were in a chronic state, and there was no change in their medications and clinical conditions between echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 26, 2001; revision received July 2, 2001; accepted July 6, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, et al. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 15271533.[Abstract]
3.
Nagueh SF, Mikati I, Kopelen HA, et al. Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in sinus tachycardia: a new application of tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation. 1998; 98: 16441650.
4.
Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 17881794.
5. Garcia MJ, Rodriquez L, Ares M, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: Assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 108114.[Abstract]
6.
Hatle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1989; 79: 357370.
7. Oh JK, Hatle LK, Seward JB, et al. Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 154162.[Abstract]
8.
Nishimura RA, Schwartz RS, Tajik AJ, et al. Noninvasive measurement of rate of left ventricular relaxation by Doppler echocardiography: validation with simultaneous cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 1993; 88: 146155.
9. Vanoverschelde JL, Robert AR, Gerbaux A, et al. Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary arterial wedge pressure with Doppler transmitral flow velocity pattern in patients with known heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 383389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Mulvagh S, Quinones MA, Kleiman NS, et al. Estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure from Doppler transmitral flow velocity in cardiac patients independent of systolic performance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 112119.[Abstract]
11. Yamamoto K, Nishimura RA, Chaliki HP, et al. Determination of left ventricular filling pressure by Doppler echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: critical role of left ventricular systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 18191826.[Abstract]
12. Arnold MF, Voight JU, Kukulski T, et al. Does atrioventricular ring motion always distinguish constriction from restriction? A Doppler myocardial imaging study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001; 14: 391395.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schwefer, R. Aschenbach, J. Heidemann, C. Mey, and H. Lapp Constrictive pericarditis, still a diagnostic challenge: comprehensive review of clinical management Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 36(3): 502 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Little and J. K. Oh Echocardiographic Evaluation of Diastolic Function Can Be Used to Guide Clinical Care Circulation, September 1, 2009; 120(9): 802 - 809. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Reuss, S. M. Wilansky, S. J. Lester, J. L. Lusk, D. E. Grill, J. K. Oh, and A. J. Tajik Using mitral 'annulus reversus' to diagnose constrictive pericarditis Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2009; 10(3): 372 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh, C. P. Appleton, T. C. Gillebert, P. N. Marino, J. K. Oh, O. A. Smiseth, A. D. Waggoner, F. A. Flachskampf, P. A. Pellikka, and A. Evangelisa Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 165 - 193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lindqvist, G. Wikstrom, and A. Waldenstrom The use of E/Em and the time interval difference of isovolumic relaxation (TIVRT-IVRTm) in estimating left ventricular filling pressures Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 490 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Lester, A. J. Tajik, R. A. Nishimura, J. K. Oh, B. K. Khandheria, and J. B. Seward Unlocking the Mysteries of Diastolic Function Deciphering the Rosetta Stone 10 Years Later. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 679 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Oh, L. Hatle, A. J. Tajik, and W. C. Little Diastolic Heart Failure Can Be Diagnosed by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 500 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Jacques, M. R. Pinsky, D. Severyn, and J. Gorcsan III Influence of Alterations in Loading on Mitral Annular Velocity by Tissue Doppler Echocardiography and Its Associated Ability To Predict Filling Pressures Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1910 - 1918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Oh and J. Tajik The return of cardiac time intervals: The Phoenix is rising J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1471 - 1474. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |