Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:1610-1613
Published online before print September 16, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034447.02535.D5
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/13/1610    most recent
01.CIR.0000034447.02535.D5v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Degertekin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Popma, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Degertekin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Popma, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

(Circulation. 2002;106:1610.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

Persistent Inhibition of Neointimal Hyperplasia After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Long-Term (Up to 2 Years) Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up

Muzaffer Degertekin, MD; Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD; David P. Foley, MB, MRCPI, PhD; Kengo Tanabe, MD; Evelyn Regar, MD; Jeroen Vos, MD, PhD; Peter C. Smits, MD, PhD; Wim J. van der Giessen, MD, PhD; Marcel van den Brand, MD, PhD; Pim de Feyter, MD, PhD; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD

From Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (M.D., P.W.S., D.P.F., K.T., E.R., J.V., P.C.S., W.J.v.d.G., M.v.d.B., P.d.F.); and Brigham and Women‘s Hospital, Boston, Mass (J.J.P.).

Correspondence to Prof PW Serruys, MD, PhD, Thoraxcenter, Bd-408, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Dr. Molewaterplein-40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail Serruys{at}card.azr.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Early results of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation showed a nearly complete abolition of neointimal hyperplasia. The question remains, however, whether the early promising results will still be evident at long-term follow-up. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficiency of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for up to 2 years of follow-up.

Methods and Results— Fifteen patients with de novo coronary artery disease were treated with 18-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stents (Cordis) loaded with 140 µg sirolimus/cm2 metal surface area in a slow release formulation. Quantitative angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed according to standard protocol. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was successful in all 15 patients. During the in-hospital course, 1 patient died of cerebral hemorrhage after periprocedural administration of abciximab, and 1 patient underwent repeat stenting after 2 hours because of edge dissection that led to acute occlusion. Through 6 months and up to 2 years of follow-up, no additional events occurred. QCA analysis revealed no significant change in stent minimal lumen diameter or percent diameter stenosis, and 3-dimensional IVUS showed no significant deterioration in lumen volume. In 2 patients, additional stenting was performed because of significant lesion progression remote from the sirolimus-eluting stent.

Conclusion— Sirolimus-eluting stents showed persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia for up to 2 years of follow-up.


Key Words: stents • restenosis • ultrasonics • drugs


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Coronary stents provide a mechanical scaffolding that virtually eliminates recoil and remodeling, but they do not reduce neointimal growth. Sirolimus-eluting stents may provide a definitive solution for in-stent restenosis in the short term.1,2,3 Histological follow-up in the porcine model, however has indicated that late neointimal hyperplasia can recur at 90 and 180 days (Andrew J. Carter, DO, unpublished data, 2001). Thus, there are sufficient concerns about delayed healing with consequent risks of late restenosis4 and thrombosis,5 late malapposition,6 edge effect,7 and, on the other hand, delayed restenosis,8 to warrant additional late follow-up catheterization. The objective of this study was to determine angiographic, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and clinical outcome up to 2 years after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in de novo coronary lesions.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients and Stent Implantation
The patient population consisted of 15 patients who were included at our center between February and May of 2000 in the First in Man clinical trial on sirolimus-eluting stents (FIM). The methodology has been published previously.3

In brief, patients with short (<15 mm) de novo coronary lesions received a single 18-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stent (Cordis). All lesions were predilated before stent implantation. The sirolimus coating was a slow-release formulation ({approx}28-day drug release with 140 µg of sirolimus per cm2 stent surface area). All patients received aspirin (325 mg/d, indefinitely) and clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose immediately and 75 mg/d for 8 weeks).

Angiographic and IVUS Analysis
Serial coronary angiography was performed at baseline, 6 months, and late follow-up (mean 20.3±2.4; range 18 to 24 months). Two coronary segments were subjected to quantitative angiography (QCA), one in stent and one in lesion. The in-stent segment encompassed only the 18-mm segment covered by the stent. The in-lesion segment was defined as the stent plus 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the edge or the nearest side branch. In-stent and in-lesion stenosis was defined as >50% diameter stenosis. QCA analysis was done by an independent core laboratory (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass).

Stented vessel segments were examined with mechanical IVUS, using automated pullback at 0.5 mm per second. A coronary segment beginning 5 mm distal to and extending 5 mm proximal to the stented segment was also examined. A computer-based contour detection program was used for automated 3-dimensional reconstruction of the stented segment from up to 200 cross-sectional images.9

Clinical Follow-Up
We assessed the clinical outcome during the hospital stay, at 6 months, and up to 2 years later. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, acute myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization of the target lesion and/or vessel by coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention.

Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data are presented as mean±SD. Multiple comparisons between postprocedural 6- and 20-month follow-up measurements were performed by ANOVA. Paired comparisons were performed by Student’s t test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Six-month outcomes of the original 15 patients have been described earlier.2 Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. In brief, between 6 months and up to 2 years after stent implantation, no additional clinical events occurred. Complete sets of postprocedural, 6-month, and late follow-up cardiac catheterizations were obtained in 10 of 14 surviving patients. Four asymptomatic patients refused to undergo a second diagnostic investigation for scientific purposes only.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics

At 18 months after the procedure, 1 patient demonstrated a significant stenosis (60% diameter stenosis; fractional flow reserve 0.65) located distally to the sirolimus stent (8 mm from distal edge by quantitative IVUS) that was treated by direct stenting. Another patient presented with effort angina 22 months after the index procedure and underwent stenting because of progression of a preexisting atherosclerotic lesion 12 mm from the distal edge of the sirolimus stent (minimal lumen area by IVUS 3.5 mm2 after the procedure and 3.0 mm2 at 22-month follow-up). Volumetric IVUS measurements showed no neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) in the stented segment. Lumen volume of both 5-mm proximal and distal edges of the sirolimus stent revealed virtually no changes when comparing postprocedural, 6-month, and 22-month follow-up measurements.

At almost 2 years of follow-up, 1 death (noncardiac) and 1 target-lesion revascularization occurred, both of which were in the early in-hospital period (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Major Adverse Cardiac Events

Quantitative Coronary Angiography and IVUS Analysis
Quantitative coronary angiography data are shown in Table 3. Twenty-month in-stent minimum lumen diameter (2.74±0.41 mm) and percent DS (3±13%) remained unchanged compared with 6-month follow-up data (2.69±0.30 mm and 11±8%, respectively; P=NS). Representative sequences of angiograms from a single patient are shown in Figure 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Quantitative Coronary Angiography Analysis



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A 38-year-old male with unstable angina and mid-right coronary artery lesion (arrow) treated with sirolimus-eluting Bx-velocity stent. No lumen deterioration was observed at 6- and 18-month follow-up (6M and 18M). Longitudinal IVUS reconstructions demonstrate absence of NIH at 6-month follow-up (B), with minimal NIH (C, arrows) at 18 months compared with after the procedure (A).

IVUS analysis demonstrated persistent inhibition of NIH at long-term follow-up (Table 4). FIM study data from Sao Paulo cohort are also shown in Table 4. Between the 6- and 20-month follow-ups, a small change in NIH (1.4±1.6 mm3 and 5.9±5.3 mm3, respectively) and in percent volume obstruction of the stent (1.1±1.2% and 4.4±3.1%, respectively) was observed. Only 1 patient reached 10% NIH of stent volume as shown by IVUS, which corresponded with an actual luminal loss of 0.29 mm at the 18-month follow-up (Figure 1). In addition, no significant change in lumen or vessel volume was observed in either proximal or distal edges of the stent (Figure 2). No late stent malapposition was detected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Volumetric IVUS Measurements



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes in vessel, plaque, and lumen volume at the sirolimus-eluting stent (A) and peri-stent margins (5-mm proximal and 5-mm distal edges of the stent) (B). Individual data are presented in relation to the line of identity. P=NS for 6-month versus 20-month follow-up


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
First clinical applications of sirolimus-eluting stents in de novo lesions were shown to be safe and feasible in preventing NIH at 6 months and 1 year, with a complete abolition of restenosis.13 Such findings have provoked considerable interest but have also raised concerns about the long-term follow-up10,11

In the present study, NIH assessed by IVUS at both 6 and 20 months was not substantially different from the 12-month follow-up data presented by Sousa et al3 (Table 3). In addition, the percent volume obstruction of the stent detected by volumetric IVUS in our study (4.4%) at 20-month follow-up is importantly less than those observed at 6-month follow-up in other trials (36% and 25%) using uncoated stents.12,13 Similarly, in-stent late loss and late loss index (LLI; 0.20 mm and 0.10, respectively) at a 20-month follow-up is markedly lower than with bare metal stents, in which late loss averages were 1.04 to 0.61 mm (LLI 0.59 to 0.39) at a 6-month12,13 and 0.46 mm (LLI 0.30) at a 36-month follow-up.14 Therefore, our findings provide considerable reassurance with regard to persistent inhibition of late restenosis or rebound hyperplasia, such as was previously observed with radioactive stents.8

In fact, minimal hyperplasia in humans up to 2 years after the procedure constitutes the first evidence that behavior in humans is at variance with the porcine model, where 90-day data actually demonstrate the recurrence of considerable NIH (Andrew J. Carter, unpublished data). For the first time in interventional cardiology, a new antirestenosis therapy performs better in humans than in the animal models.

Concern about potential late complications, such as late occlusion, thrombosis, late malapposition, aneurysm, and edge restenosis as reported in patients treated with brachytherapy,13 has not been observed in our patient population during up to 2 years of follow-up.

It has to be emphasized that short-term (8-week) antiplatelet therapy as used here and in the RAndomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL)15 provides adequate protection against subacute and late thrombotic occlusion. Nonetheless, generalization of these findings to treatment of long and complex lesions, total chronic occlusion, left main stem, etc, needs to be specifically evaluated in clinical trials.

The need for late target-vessel revascularization in 2 patients in lesions remote from the sirolimus stent again emphasizes the indolent nature of atherosclerosis in some patients. Although this study confirms that sirolimus-eluting stents constitute a major advance in restenosis prevention, the problem of atherosclerosis itself remains a considerable challenge.

Limitations
This is a small observational study and the results need to be confirmed by long-term follow-up in larger patient series. Lack of complete QCA and IVUS follow-up was unfortunate but was not prespecified in the study protocol. The virtual absence of NIH in the 10 patients studied at 20 months renders the data quite compelling because the remaining 4 patients were completely asymptomatic.

Conclusion
Sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stents demonstrated persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia and absence of restenosis in single de novo coronary lesions for up to 2 years of follow-up.


*    Footnotes
 
Dr Popma received research grant support from Angiographic Core Laboratory.

Received May 6, 2002; revision received July 30, 2002; accepted August 5, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 192–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Rensing B, Vos J, Smits P, et al. Coronary restenosis elimination with a sirolimus eluting stent: first European human experience with six month angiographic and intravascular ultrasonic follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 2125–2130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid AC, et al. Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2007–2011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Suzuki T, Kopia G, Hayashi S, et al. Stent-based delivery of sirolimus reduces neointimal formation in a porcine coronary model. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1188–1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Costa MA, Sabate M, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Late coronary occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy. Circulation. 1999; 100: 789–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kozuma K, Costa MA, Sabate M, et al. Late stent malapposition occurring after intracoronary beta-irradiation detected by intravascular ultrasound. J Invasive Cardiol. 1999; 11: 651–655.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Albiero R, Nishida T, Adamian M, et al. Edge restenosis after implantation of high activity (32)P radioactive beta-emitting stents. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2454–2457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kay IP, Wardeh AJ, Kozuma K, et al. Radioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 14–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hamers R, Bruining N, Knook M, et al. A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Comput Cardiol. 2001; 28: 589–592.
  10. Serruys PW, Regar E, Carter AJ. Rapamycin eluting stent: the onset of a new era in interventional cardiology. Heart. 2002; 87: 305–307.[Free Full Text]
  11. Teirstein PS. Living the dream of no restenosis. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1996–1998.[Free Full Text]
  12. Acute platelet inhibition with abciximab does not reduce in-stent restenosis (ERASER study). The ERASER Investigators. Circulation. 1999; 100: 799–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Serruys PW, Foley DP, Pieper M, et al. The TRAPIST Study: a multicentre randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of trapidil for prevention of restenosis after coronary stenting, measured by 3-D intravascular ultrasound. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 1938–1947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kimura T, Yokoi H, Yoshihisa N, et al. Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 561–566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. The RAVEL trial. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1773–1780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Awata, J.-i. Kotani, M. Uematsu, T. Morozumi, T. Watanabe, T. Onishi, O. Iida, F. Sera, S. Nanto, M. Hori, et al.
Serial Angioscopic Evidence of Incomplete Neointimal Coverage After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison With Bare-Metal Stents
Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A N Seale, P E F Daubeney, A G Magee, and M L Rigby
Pulmonary vein stenosis: initial experience with cutting balloon angioplasty
Heart, June 1, 2006; 92(6): 815 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. T.L. Ong, R. T. van Domburg, J. Aoki, K. Sonnenschein, P. A. Lemos, and P. W. Serruys
Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Remain Superior to Bare-Metal Stents at Two Years: Medium-Term Results From the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1356 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
W. Alvarez Jr and N. K. Kapur
Drug Eluting Stent Technology: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment and Prevention of Restenosis
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2005; 18(6): 461 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G Sianos, A Hoye, F Saia, W van der Giessen, P Lemos, P J de Feyter, P C Levendag, R van Domburg, and P W Serruys
Long term outcome after intracoronary {beta} radiation therapy
Heart, July 1, 2005; 91(7): 942 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Fajadet, M.-C. Morice, C. Bode, P. Barragan, P. W. Serruys, W. Wijns, C. R. Constantini, J.-L. Guermonprez, H. Eltchaninoff, D. Blanchard, et al.
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit With Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Three-Year Results of the RAVEL Trial
Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): 1040 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Lindenfeld, G. G. Miller, S. F. Shakar, R. Zolty, B. D. Lowes, E. E. Wolfel, L. Mestroni, R. L. Page II, and J. Kobashigawa
Drug Therapy in the Heart Transplant Recipient: Part II: Immunosuppressive Drugs
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): 3858 - 3865.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. Popma, M. B. Leon, J. W. Moses, D. R. Holmes Jr, N. Cox, M. Fitzpatrick, J. Douglas, C. Lambert, M. Mooney, S. Yakubov, et al.
Quantitative Assessment of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Native Coronary Arteries
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): 3773 - 3780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. J. Murphy, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1861 - 1867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Waksman, A. E. Ajani, A. D. Pichard, R. Torguson, E. Pinnow, D. Canos, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, P. Kuchulakanti, C. Pappas, et al.
Oral rapamycin to inhibit restenosis after stenting of de novo coronary lesions: The Oral Rapamune to Inhibit Restenosis (ORBIT) study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1386 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F Saia, P A Lemos, C A Arampatzis, A Hoye, M Degertekin, K Tanabe, G Sianos, P C Smits, W J van der Giessen, P J de Feyter, et al.
Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: insights from the rapamycin eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital (RESEARCH) registry
Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1183 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Di Mario and G Mikhail
Treating multivessel disease in the era of coated stents: introduction
Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 989 - 989.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P W Serruys, P A Lemos, and B A van Hout
Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for patients with multivessel disease: rationale for the arterial revascularisation therapies study part II (ARTS II)
Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 995 - 998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. Vogt, A. Stein, G. Rettemeier, N. Krott, R. Hoffmann, J. v. Dahl, A.-K. Bosserhoff, W. Michaeli, P. Hanrath, C. Weber, et al.
Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1330 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Hoye, K. Tanabe, P. A. Lemos, J. Aoki, F. Saia, C. Arampatzis, M. Degertekin, S. H. Hofma, G. Sianos, E. McFadden, et al.
Significant reduction in restenosis after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1954 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Mourani, P. J. Garl, J. M. Wenzlau, T. C. Carpenter, K. R. Stenmark, and M. C.M. Weiser-Evans
Unique, Highly Proliferative Growth Phenotype Expressed by Embryonic and Neointimal Smooth Muscle Cells Is Driven by Constitutive Akt, mTOR, and p70S6K Signaling and Is Actively Repressed by PTEN
Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1299 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Curcio, D. Torella, G. Cuda, C. Coppola, M. C. Faniello, F. Achille, V. G. Russo, M. Chiariello, and C. Indolfi
Effect of stent coating alone on in vitro vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and apoptosis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H902 - H908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. W. Serruys, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, M. E. Russell, G. Guagliumi, J. Webb, J. Hamburger, W. Rutsch, C. Kaiser, R. Whitbourn, et al.
Vascular Responses at Proximal and Distal Edges of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis From the TAXUS II Trial
Circulation, February 10, 2004; 109(5): 627 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Lemos, P. W. Serruys, R. T. van Domburg, F. Saia, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, J. Daemen, T. K.K. Liu, et al.
Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the "Real World": The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry
Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 190 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Degertekin, P. A. Lemos, C. H. Lee, K. Tanabe, J.E. Sousa, A. Abizaid, E. Regar, G. Sianos, W. J. van der Giessen, P. J. de Feyter, et al.
Intravascular ultrasound evaluation after sirolimus eluting stent implantation for de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
V Bhatia, R Bhatia, and M Dhindsa
Drug-eluting stents: new era and new concerns
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 80(939): 13 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Saia, P. A. Lemos, C.-H. Lee, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, G. Sianos, P. C. Smits, E. McFadden, et al.
Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Clinical and Angiographic Study
Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1927 - 1929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. R. Edelman and H. D. Danenberg
Rapamycin for Cardiac Transplant Rejection and Vasculopathy: One Stone, Two Birds?
Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 6 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Lemos, P. W. Serruys, and J. E. Sousa
Drug-Eluting Stents: Cost Versus Clinical Benefit
Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3003 - 3007.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. W. O'Neill and M. B. Leon
Drug-Eluting Stents: Costs Versus Clinical Benefit
Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3008 - 3011.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. Lemos, C.-h. Lee, M. Degertekin, F. Saia, K. Tanabe, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. van Duuren, G. Sianos, P. C. Smits, et al.
Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2093 - 2099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
J. J. Paszkowiak and A. Dardik
Arterial Wall Shear Stress: Observations from the Bench to the Bedside
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2003; 37(1): 47 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. E. Levy and J. A.S. Muldowney 3rd
Microarray Analysis of Neointima: Flowing Toward a Clear Future
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2002; 22(12): 1946 - 1947.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
G. Mozes and P. Gloviczki
Adjuvant Therapy in Lower Extremity Revascularization: Prevention of Early and Intermediate Failures
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2002; 15(2): 161 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/13/1610    most recent
01.CIR.0000034447.02535.D5v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Degertekin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Popma, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Degertekin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Popma, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents