Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:1756-1759
Published online before print September 23, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000035240.92015.E4
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/14/1756    most recent
01.CIR.0000035240.92015.E4v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beeri, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hajjar, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beeri, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hajjar, R. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Genes and Gene Therapy
Related Collections
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Gene therapy

(Circulation. 2002;106:1756.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

New Efficient Catheter-Based System for Myocardial Gene Delivery

Ronen Beeri, MD; J. Luis Guerrero, BS; Gregory Supple, BS; Suzanne Sullivan, BS; Robert A. Levine, MD; Roger J. Hajjar, MD

From the Cardiovascular Research Center and Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Roger J. Hajjar, MD, Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, CNY4, Charlestown, MA 02129. E-mail rhajjar{at}partners.org


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Manipulating gene expression in the failing heart has therapeutic promise, but until now efficient and homogeneous cardiac gene delivery has required an open-chest approach. This study examines the hypothesis that vector delivery promoted by echo contrast microbubbles will be maximized by injection of the vectors into the aortic root with brief balloon occlusion above the sinuses, while at the same time prolonging diastole and vasodilating with acetylcholine (ACh) to maximize coronary exposure.

Methods and Results— After incubation with albumin-coated perfluorocarbon microbubbles, an adenovirus encoding a reporter gene was infused into the aortic root of rats. To maximize delivery, the aortic root was transiently occluded with a balloon catheter during a brief ACh-induced asystole. Ultrasound was used to image the delivery and disrupt the microbubbles. Aortic occlusion with concomitant ACh increased myocardial gene expression for virus + microbubbles by >2.5-fold, from 925±165 to 2358±376 relative units (RU; P<0.01). This delivery system also produced substantial expression with vector alone (1473±549 RU). All uptakes were significant compared with 433±332 RU without virus.

Conclusions— An adenoviral delivery system combining echo contrast with a catheter-based technique to maximize coronary perfusion increases gene delivery compared with echo contrast alone. This novel method permits efficient percutaneous gene delivery in closed-chest animals.


Key Words: gene therapy • echocardiography • catheterization


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Improvements in vector technology and our understanding of the pathogenesis of myocardial dysfunction have prompted consideration of gene therapy for heart failure. Efficient global cardiac gene delivery, however, has until now required open-chest methods. Recently, effective in vivo myocardial gene delivery has been achieved by directly injecting vectors into the myocardium or by perfusing the heart with them under cardiopulmonary bypass;1 it has also been achieved by trans-apical injection,2,3 but this has required an open-chest approach with cross-clamping to block outflow from the cardiac chambers. Our next challenge is to determine whether we can achieve comparable efficiencies in closed-chest animals.

Exposure time and high coronary flow are major determinants of efficient intracoronary gene delivery.4 As maximal coronary flow is diastolic, prolonging this phase would maximize myocardial exposure to the vector. In addition, a major obstacle to efficient transcoronary gene delivery is the endothelial barrier, which hinders the passage of macromolecules and cells to the myocardial interstitium. Echocardiographic contrast agents disrupt this microvascular barrier, 5,6 permitting passage of colloidal particles and red blood cells from the lumen to the interstitium.7 Specifically, albumin-shelled microbubbles enhance gene delivery to cardiomyocytes8 and are effective when delivered intravenously and caused to burst by ultrasound energy when they reach the myocardial vasculature.

We therefore sought to test the hypothesis that combining a catheter-based adenoviral vector delivery system that increases coronary exposure with echocardiographic contrast microbubbles could enhance the efficiency of semi-invasive gene delivery.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A recombinant adenovirus carrying the ß-galactosidase (ßGal) gene under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (Ad.CMV.,Gal) was constructed as described previously.2 The stock solution titer was 1.3x1012 particles/mL, and the particle-to-plaque forming units (pfu) ratio was 1:40. A 200-µl aliquot per animal was mixed in 0.25 mL of an albumin-coated perfluorocarbon-containing microbubble suspension (Optison, Mallinckrodt), incubated for 30 minutes, and shaken before injection.

Delivery Protocol
Male Lewis rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) were anesthetized with intraperitoneal pentorbarbital (60 mg/kg), intubated, and ventilated (Harvard Apparatus). A linear phased-array 10-MHz echocardiographic probe (AcuNav, Acuson) was inserted into the esophagus and connected to an echocardiographic scanner (Sequoia, Acuson). The catheter was oriented to produce a long-axis view of the left ventricle (Figure 1), and the heart continuously imaged at a low mechanical index (0.5) to preserve microbubbles. A coronary balloon angioplasty catheter was inserted through the right carotid artery, and its tip was placed just above the aortic valve with the use of echo guidance. The balloon was inflated with saline to occlude the aorta, and 1.5 µg acetylcholine in normal saline was immediately injected through the catheter, followed by 0.25 mL of the virus-microbubbles suspension and then a 1-mL saline flush. When asystole occurred and the myocardium filled with contrast, the ultrasound mechanical index was raised to 1.5 to disrupt the microbubbles and was maintained until contrast depletion was noted. When contraction resumed, the balloon was deflated. Echo mechanical index was raised again whenever myocardial microbubble replenishment was noted. The maximum asystolic time was 5 seconds. The carotid artery was repaired using 7-0 sutures, the skin closed, and the animals allowed to recover. They were euthanized 5 days later using high-dose pentobarbital, and the heart, liver (positive control), lung, and rectus abdominis muscle (negative control) were harvested and snap frozen. This study was approved by our institutional Animal Research Committee and conformed to American Heart Association principles.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Transesophageal long-axis left ventricular view showing echo contrast in the anterior wall pre-injection (A) and post-injection (B), along with some contrast in the LV cavity. C, Macroscopic anterior view of group 1 heart with Xgal staining (blue) along the echo beam track.

Histochemistry and ß-Galactosidase Activity
The extent of gene transduction in the heart muscle was evaluated by a qualitative histochemical staining and quantitative colorimetric assay for ß-galactosidase activity. Ventricular tissues were fixed in 0.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 minutes, and then in 30% sucrose for 30 minutes. After permeabilization, tissues were incubated overnight in Xgal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside), sectioned every 10 µm, and viewed under a light microscope with the images digitally stored.

ß-galactosidase activity was measured in the microscopic sections by a colorimetric assay (Sigma) and expressed as relative Xgal units (RU). In each sample, 10 contiguous fields from the anterior wall (most evident visible staining) were quantitatively analyzed and the results were averaged.

Experimental Groups
The rats were divided into treatment groups of 5 animals each (Table), which were adenovirus + microbubbles, with and without delivery system (balloon catheter + ACh); adenovirus + delivery system without microbubbles; and controls without virus (with microbubbles + delivery system).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Experimental Groups

Statistical Analysis
Colorimetric data were compared among groups using ANOVA, with 2-way comparisons by Student-Neumann-Keuls test (StatView 5, SAS Institute Inc; significance at P<0.05).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Localization
All hearts in groups 1 and 2 (adenovirus + microbubbles with and without delivery system) macroscopically demonstrated blue Xgal staining that was confined to the anterior and posterior walls, which were insonated by the linear echo probe, as opposed to the septal and lateral walls which were not (Figure 1). This is consistent with the importance of ultrasound-induced microbubble disruption to this process. This was corroborated by the qualitative microscopic examination. None of the hearts from group 4 rats (controls) showed any staining. No myocardial damage was noted in the treated areas.

Gene Expression by Group
By colorimetric assay, group 1 (adenovirus + microbubbles + delivery system) demonstrated significantly increased transgene expression compared with the other groups (Figure 2A). Aortic occlusion with concomitant ACh increased myocardial gene expression for the virus + microbubbles group by >2.5-fold, from 925±165 to 2358±376 RU (P<0.01). This delivery system also produced substantial expression with virus alone (1473±549 RU), although less than with delivery system + virus + microbubbles (P<0.05), suggesting the additional importance of the microbubbles. All uptakes were significant compared with 433±332 RU without virus (P<0.01).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Xgal colorimetric assay (mean±SEM). Results in groups receiving virus are significant versus each other (*P<0.05) and versus no-virus controls (P<0.01 to 0.05). B, Mechanism of the delivery system.

Extracardiac Tissue Gene Expression
Extracardiac gene expression was noted in the liver (840±151 RU, n=4) and the lungs (604±126 RU, n=4), though it was relatively low in both. ß-galactosidase activity in skeletal muscle did not exceed baseline (294±778 RU, n=4) and had no evident staining, suggesting high myocardial selectivity of this delivery method.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study demonstrates that the combination of echo contrast microbubbles and a catheter-based viral vector delivery system provides superior gene transduction to any one of those mechanisms alone, as well as to simply injecting the virus into the aortic root. This system was designed to overcome the major obstacles to efficient percutaneous myocardial gene delivery, including endothelial barrier crossing, exposure time, and specific delivery to cardiomyocytes (Figure 2B).

Endothelial Crossing
Increasing coronary permeability using agents such as serotonin enhances myocardial gene delivery,4 as does ultrasound contrast infused along with the viral vector.8 These agents are microbubbles that resonate when ultrasound energy is applied. When that energy exceeds a threshold, the bubbles are destroyed,5,9 thereby disrupting the endothelium and allowing passage of cells and macromolecules into the myocardial interstitium.6,7 Microbubbles may also "carry" viral vectors on their shell.10,11

Coronary Delivery
Exposure time critically influences gene delivery. Donahue et al4 demonstrated that coronary vasodilation with a low-calcium perfusate increases transduction efficiency. We chose acetylcholine because it both dilates normal arteries and induces a short-lived asystole,12 prolonging diastole to maximize coronary flow. It also has an extremely short half-life.

Transport
Another factor to consider in maximizing gene delivery efficiency is the fraction of virus that is actually delivered to the heart. This has been addressed by direct virus injection into the heart,13 into a coronary artery,14 retrogradely into a coronary vein,15 or via a cardiopulmonary bypass cardioplegia cannula.1 We reported efficient myocardial gene expression using isovolumic contraction against a closed aorta with direct aortic root virus injection.2,16,17 The delivery system reported here is also based on aortic occlusion using a balloon catheter, thus directing the bulk flow of viral suspension into the coronary arteries. The first contractions after the short asystole actually occur against an inflated balloon, further enhancing coronary delivery. The inflated balloon limits viral transport to the rest of the body, while localized microbubble destruction further promotes selective delivery. In principle, cardiac-specific promoters such as those for myosin light chain, cardiac troponin T, and brain natriuretic peptide could be used to target the myocardium; however, local delivery would still be important because they have low activity compared with the CMV promoter.

As it was beyond the scope of this initial study, we did not assess any functional gene beyond a reporter to determine whether efficient delivery will translate into long-term function change. Our previous studies confirm that SERCA2a gene transduction using this vector significantly affects protein expression, cellular and cardiac function, and eventually, survival.16,17 The reported delivery system is designed to increase the efficiency of such transduction. More widespread uptake could be promoted by scanning the ultrasound beam across the heart during infusion, or by using a broader beam. We elected to use a transesophageal probe to maintain a sterile field on the chest and neck of the animals. This narrow beam allowed comparison of insonated to non-insonated areas, thus demonstrating the importance of ultrasound.

All animals did well except for 2 early postoperative deaths, 1 each in groups 2 and 4 (no delivery system/no-vector controls), both related to upper airway obstruction. Mild momentary conjunctival hemorrhage with no sequelae was associated with rapid aortic balloon deflation (pressure upsurge) in the relevant groups.

This new system therefore permits efficient percutaneous gene delivery in closed-chest animals by maximizing access of adenoviral vectors to the coronary circulation and myocardial uptake. We can envision that this minimally invasive procedure could potentially increase the future accessibility of gene therapy, particularly as approaches are developed to benefit heart failure patients who would be at higher risk for open-chest procedures.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grant HL57623 from the National Institutes of Health (Dr Hajjar). Dr Hajjar is a Paul Beeson Scholar supported by the American Federation of Aging Research. Dr Beeri is supported by National Institutes of Health grant HL38176.

Received July 2, 2002; revision received August 13, 2002; accepted August 15, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Davidson MJ, Jones JM, Emani SM, et al. Cardiac gene delivery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 2001; 104: 131–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Hajjar RJ, Schmidt U, Matsui T, et al. Modulation of ventricular function through gene transfer in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 5251–5256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Miyamoto MI, del Monte F, Schmidt U, et al. Adenoviral gene transfer of SERCA2a improves left-ventricular function in aortic-banded rats in transition to heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 793–798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Donahue JK, Kikkawa K, Johns DC, et al. Ultrarapid, highly efficient viral gene transfer to the heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 4664–4668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Skyba DM, Price RJ, Linka AZ, et al. Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue. Circulation. 1998; 98: 290–293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Ay T, Havaux X, Van Camp G, et al. Destruction of contrast microbubbles by ultrasound: effects on myocardial function, coronary perfusion pressure, and microvascular integrity. Circulation. 2001; 104: 461–466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Price RJ, Skyba DM, Kaul S, et al. Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1264–1267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Shohet RV, Chen S, Zhou Y-T, et al. Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2554–2556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Wei K, Skyba DM, Firschke C, et al. Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1081–1088.[Abstract]

10. Unger EC, Hersh E, Vannan M, et al. Gene delivery using ultrasound contrast agents. Echocardiography. 2001; 18: 355–361.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Porter TR, Xie F. Therapeutic ultrasound for gene delivery. Echocardiography. 2001; 18: 349–353.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Pappano AJ. Cholinoceptor-activating, cholinesterase-inhibiting drugs.In. Katzung BG, ed. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 8th ed. New York, NY: Lange Medical Books; 2001: 92–107.

13. Vale PR, Losordo DW, Tkebuchava T, et al. Catheter-based myocardial gene transfer utilizing nonfluoroscopic electromechanical left ventricular mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 246–254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Weig H-J, Laugwitz K-L, Moretti A, et al. Enhanced cardiac contractility after gene transfer of V2 vasopressin receptors in vivo by ultrasound-guided injection or transcoronary delivery. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1578–1585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Boekstegers P, von Degenfeld G, Giehrl W, et al. Myocardial gene transfer by selective pressure-regulated retroinfusion of coronary veins. Gene Ther. 2000; 7: 232–240.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Schmidt U, del Monte F, Miyamoto MI, et al. Restoration of diastolic function in senescent rat hearts through adenoviral gene transfer of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase. Circulation. 2000; 101: 790–796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. del Monte F, Williams E, Lebeche D, et al. Improvement in survival and cardiac metabolism after gene transfer of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase in a rat model of heart failure. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1424–1429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
X. Li, Z. Wang, H. Ran, X. Li, Q. Yuan, Y. Zheng, J. Ren, L. Su, W. Zhang, Q. Li, et al.
Experimental Research on Therapeutic Angiogenesis Induced by Hepatocyte Growth Factor Directed by Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction in Rats
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2008; 27(3): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
O. J. Muller, H. A. Katus, and R. Bekeredjian
Targeting the heart with gene therapy-optimized gene delivery methods
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2007; 73(3): 453 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. Vancraeynest, X. Havaux, A.-C. Pouleur, A. Pasquet, B. Gerber, C. Beauloye, P. Rafter, L. Bertrand, and J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde
Myocardial delivery of colloid nanoparticles using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 237 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. Kondo, K. Ohmori, A. Oshita, H. Takeuchi, S. Fuke, K. Shinomiya, T. Noma, T. Namba, and M. Kohno
Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer: The first demonstration of myocardial transfer of a "functional" gene using ultrasonic microbubble destruction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 644 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Roth, N. C. Lai, M. H. Gao, J. D. Drumm, J. Jimenez, J. R. Feramisco, and H. K. Hammond
Indirect intracoronary delivery of adenovirus encoding adenylyl cyclase increases left ventricular contractile function in mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H172 - H177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P D Lambiase and M S Marber
Myocardial gene and cell delivery
Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 1 - 2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H-D Liang and M J K Blomley
The role of ultrasound in molecular imaging
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_2): S140 - S150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. J. Giordano
Retrograde coronary perfusion: a superior route to deliver therapeutics to the heart?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1129 - 1131.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/14/1756    most recent
01.CIR.0000035240.92015.E4v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beeri, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hajjar, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beeri, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hajjar, R. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Genes and Gene Therapy
Related Collections
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Gene therapy