Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:1133-1139
Published online before print August 12, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000027584.85865.B4
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/9/1133    most recent
01.CIR.0000027584.85865.B4v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murasawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asahara, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murasawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asahara, T.

(Circulation. 2002;106:1133.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Constitutive Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Expression Enhances Regenerative Properties of Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Satoshi Murasawa, MD, PhD; Joan Llevadot, MD; Marcy Silver, BS; Jeffrey M. Isner, MD{dagger}; Douglas W. Losordo, MD; Takayuki Asahara, MD, PhD

From the Department of Medicine (Vascular Medicine, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research), St Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine (S.M., J.L., M.S., J.M.I., D.W.L., T.A.), Boston, Mass; Stem Cell Translational Research, Kobe Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation/Riken Center for Developmental Biology (S.M., T.A.), Kobe, Japan; Department of Physiology, Tokai University School of Medicine (T.A.), Kanagawa, Japan.

Correspondence to Douglas W. Losordo, MD, or Takayuki Asahara, MD, PhD, St Elizabeth’s Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135. E-mail douglas.losordo{at}tufts.edu or asa777@aol.com


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The regulatory molecule for cell life span, telomerase, was modified by human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene transfer to investigate its effect on regenerative properties of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in neovascularization.

Methods and Results— Telomerase activity was enhanced in hTERT-transduced EPCs (Td-TERTs) (1.2-fold versus no transduced EPCs [no-Td] and 1.2-fold versus GFP-transduced EPCs [Td/GFPs] at day 8; 5.2-fold versus no-Td and 4.8-fold versus Td/GFP at day 21, respectively) Mitogenic capacity in Td/TERTs exceeded that in Td/GFPs at day 8 (0.62±0.02 versus 0.53±0.01, respectively; P<0.01). Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced cell migration in EPCs was markedly enhanced by hTERT overexpression (Td/TERTs versus Td/GFPs, 292±12 versus 174±6 cells, respectively; P<0.01). hTERT overexpression has rescued EPCs from starvation-induced cell apoptosis, an outcome that was further enhanced in response to vascular endothelial growth factor. The colony appearance of totally differentiated endothelial cells (tdECs) was detected before day 30 only in Td/TERT, whereas no tdEC colonies could be detected in both Td/GFPs and no-Tds. Finally, we investigated in vivo transplantation of heterologous EPCs. Td/TERTs dramatically improved postnatal neovascularization in terms of limb salvage by 4-fold in comparison with that of Td/GFPs; limb perfusion was measured by laser Doppler (0.77±0.10 versus 0.47±0.06; P=0.02), and capillary density (224±78 versus 90±40 capillaries/mm2; P<0.01).

Conclusions— These findings provide the novel evidence that telomerase activity contributes to EPC angiogenic properties; mitogenic activity, migratory activity, and cell survival. This enhanced regenerative activity of EPCs by hTERT transfer will provide novel therapeutical strategy for postnatal neovascularization in severe ischemic disease patients.


Key Words: telomerase • gene therapy • stem cells, endothelial • angiogenesis • ischemia


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The plasticity of stem and progenitor cells is attracting the attention to regenerative application to many inherited and acquired diseases. The regenerative potential of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)15 has been previously demonstrated in animal models of myocardial6 and limb7 ischemia, via ex vivo expansion and incorporation into foci of neovascularization. Physiological evidence of neovascular function in these preclinical animal models disclosed an improvement in myocardial function or a high rate of limb salvage. Despite promising applications for tissue regeneration, the limited endogenous pool, the possible functional impairment associated with a variety of physiological and pathological phenotypes on clinical patients, and the finite replicative feature of EPCs for ex vivo expansion constitute potentially important liabilities for autologous transplantation. We hypothesized that gene transfer can be used to achieve phenotype modulation of EPCs to overcome this issue. Very recently, our laboratory has determined the impact of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transfer on certain properties of EPCs in vitro and the consequences of VEGF EPC transfer on neovascularization in vivo.8

Most somatic cells of humans and other mammals undergo a finite number of cell divisions, ultimately entering a nondividing state termed senescence.911 Loss of telomerase activity has been suggested to constitute the molecular clock that triggers cellular senescence.12,13 In contrast to somatic cells, true stem cells and germline cells highly express the catalytic subunit of telomerase (human telomerase reverse transcriptase [hTERT]),1316 thus maintaining telomerase activity and full replication of telomeric DNA; these cells (by definition) are thereby able to divide indefinitely.17 Although demonstrating regenerative potentials for vascular development, EPCs are not pluripotent, self-renewing stem cells, but rather lineage-committed progenitors, and are thus subject to a Hayflick life span18 via replicative senescence. Accordingly, we have deduced that constitutive expression of hTERT might induce delay in senescence and recover/enhance regenerative properties of EPCs. Ectopic expression of the hTERT gene has been investigated as a means to bypass senescence; indeed, this strategy has been used successfully to impart replicative immortality to fibroblasts and retinal pigment epithelial cells19 without converting either to a transformed neoplastic phenotype.20,21 The immortalized blood vessel-derived endothelial cells (ECs) similarly exhibited neither evidence of malignant transformation nor loss of functional and morphogenetic characteristics of the parental cells.22 Such hTERT-transduced (Td-hTERT) EC lines appeared more resistant to programmed cell death, exhibited a survival advantage beyond replicative senescence,22 and had improved NO production compared with that of control senescent cells.23

These findings have encouraged consideration of potential therapeutic applications of hTERT gene transfer to achieve functional improvement in EPCs through delay in senescence and recovering/enhancing regenerative properties of EPCs.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
EPC Culture and Gene Transfer
Total peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from human volunteers by density-gradient centrifugation. After 4 days in culture, nonadherent cells were removed by washing with PBS, new media was applied, and the culture was maintained through day 7 or later.24 In the culture of EPCs after day 7, reseeding was performed once a week. Both Ad/hTERT (Ad5CMVe/ß-actin pro/hTERT {Delta}E3) and Ad/GFP (Ad5CMV/GFP {Delta}E3) were provided by Geron Inc (Menlo Park, Calif). Briefly, the recombinant adenoviruses were constructed by homologous recombination between the parental virus genome and the expression cosmid cassette or shuttle vector as described.25,26 Day-7 cultured EPCs were transduced with 500 MOI of Ad/hTERT or Ad/GFP in endothelial cell growth media (EGM-2) supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum for 3 hours, and the next day, transduced EPCs were reseeded or assayed.

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction
Cells with or without adenovirus gene transduction were lysed in RNA lysis buffer (Ambion). RNA was extracted by use of an RNA extraction kit (Ambion). DNAase digestion was performed after RNA extraction. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed by a system according to the manufacturer (Clontech). The primers for RT-PCR in the hTERT gene were follows: sense, CACCTCACCTCACCCACgCgAAA; antisense, CCAAAgAgTTTgCgACgCATgTT.

Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol Assay
EPCs were washed with PBS and 1x105 cells were lysed in 200 µL of 3[(3-cholamidopropoyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propane-sulfonate (CHAPS) lysis buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 1 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 0.1 mmol/L benzamidine, 5 mmol/L ß-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% w/v CHAPS, 10% w/v glycerol). The homogenate was incubated on ice for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 12 000g for 30 minutes. An aliquot of 2 µL of this supernatant (1000 cell equivalents) was used for PCR amplification to detect the telomerase products. Telomerase products were amplified with the downstream reverse primer (RP; 5' GCGCGG (CTTACC)3 CTAACC 3') and the upstream primer telomerase substrate (TS; 5' AATCCGTCGAGCAGAGTT 3'); 293-cell extract was used for positive control.

SA-ß-Gal Activity Assay
EPC senescence was investigated by senescence-associated ß-galactosidase (SA-ß-Gal) activity assay described previously.27

Proliferation and Migration Assays
Proliferative activity of transduced EPCs was evaluated using the MTS assay (MTS Assay, Promega).24 EPC migration was evaluated using a modified Boyden chamber assay.24

Apoptosis Assay
To detect the frequency of cellular apoptosis, fluorescence-labeled Annexin-V-FLUOS staining of transduced EPCs was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).28

EPC Differentiation Colony Assay
Transduced EPCs were cultured as described above and reseeded once per week. Colony appearance of totally differentiated ECs (tdECs) was studied under phase contrast microscopy 3 days per week. Established colonies were evaluated as tdECs by use of assays for 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3', 3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (acLDL-DiI) incorporation and Matrigel tube formation. Incorporation of acLDL-DiI typically appears less intense in tdECs (stain moderately within 1 hour with 20 µg/mL acLDL-DiI) than in the less differentiated EPCs (stain strongly within 30 minutes with 5 µg/mL acLDL-DiI). Non-EC—including fibroblasts, myoblasts, and epiblasts—do not incorporate acLDL. Within 12 hours, tdECs form complete capillary-like tubes in Matrigel (Becton Dickinson Labware).1,28

Murine Hindlimb Ischemia Model
The impact of EPC administration on therapeutic neovascularization was investigated in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia, by use of athymic nude or severe combined immunodeficient mice.2931 Athymic nude mice (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, Maine), age 8 to 10 wks and weighing 17 to 22 g, were anesthetized with 160 mg/kg pentobarbital intraperitoneally for operative resection of one femoral artery, and subsequently for laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI; Lisca).28,32,33 Immediately before euthanasia, mice were injected with an overdose of pentobarbital. One day after operatively induced hindlimb ischemia, the athymic nude mice, in which angiogenesis is characteristically impaired,34 received an intravenous injection of 1.5x104 culture-expanded EPCs transduced with Ad/hTERT (Td/hTERT) or Ad/GFP (Td/GFP). Tissue sections were stained for alkaline phosphatase by use of indoxyltetrazolium to detect capillary ECs, as previously described29 and were then counterstained with eosin.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Time Course of hTERT Overexpression After Adenoviral Transduction
RT-PCR was performed to evaluate the hTERT expression level after adenoviral transduction. Endogenous hTERT was observed only in day-10 nontransduced EPCs (no-Td). On the other hand ectopic hTERT was highly expressed at day 10, 3 days after Ad/hTERT transduction, and was gradually reduced during cultivating EPCs. Reseeding was performed days 4 and 7 after isolation and once a week after day 7. (Figure 1).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression of hTERT mRNA level. RNA samples from EPCs with or without Ad/hTERT were analyzed by RT-PCR for the expression of hTERT. GAPDH served as internal standard. (+) indicates EPCs transduced with Ad/hTERT at day7; (-), EPCs without adenoviral transduction.

Telomerase Activity After hTERT Overexpression
EPC gene modification was performed using adenovirus-encoding hTERT or green fluorescent protein (GFP; Ad/hTERT and Ad/GFP, respectively). Cultured EPCs, transduced on day 7 with Ad/hTERT and Ad/GFP (Td/hTERT or Td/GFP, respectively), as well as no-Tds, were assayed for telomerase activity at 1, 7, and 14 days after transduction (days 8, 14, and 21 in culture, respectively). Telomerase activity appeared robust in no-Td EPCs at day 8 but was dramatically reduced by days 14 and 21 (Figure 2A). After gene transfer, telomerase activity was enhanced in Td/hTERT EPCs (1.2-fold versus no-Td and 1.2-fold versus Td/GFP at day 8; 1.5-fold versus no-Td and 1.2-fold versus Td/GFP at day 14; 5.2-fold versus no-Td and 4.8-fold versus Td/GFP at day 21) (Figure 2B).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Telomerase activity in Td/hTERT, Td/GFP, and no-Td EPCs. EPCs were transduced on culture day 7 with adenovirus-encoding hTERT or GFP (Td/hTERT or Td/GFP, respectively) or no vector (no-Td). EPCs from 1, 7, and 14 days after transduction (culture days 8, 14, and 21, respectively) were used for telomerase activity assay. A, An aliquot of 2 µL of this supernatant (1000 cell equivalents) was used for PCR amplification to detect the telomerase products. Positive control indicates cell extract from positive control; heat inactivated, heat inactivated sample; and HUVEC, cell extract from human umbilical vein endothelial cell. B, Quantification of telomerase activity was performed to identify the total product generated (TPG) by densitometry of the digitized image (CTL indicates no-Td; TERT, Td/hTERT; and GFP, Td/GFP).

SA-ß-Gal Activity in EPCs
The impact of hTERT expression on EPC senescence was evaluated by SA-ß-Gal activity assay to confirm the result of telomerase activity. At day 8, SA-ß-Gal-positive cells were equally rare among no-Td, Td/hTERT, and Td/GFP EPCs (0.13%±0.02 versus 0.07%±0.01 versus 0.27%±0.02; P=NS). At day 14, the proportion of SA-ß-Gal positive cells was increased ({approx}5%) in no-Td and Td/GFP EPCs; among Td/hTERT, however, a very low proportion of senescent cells (no-Td versus Td/hTERT versus Td/GFP, 5.13%±0.30 versus 0.20%±0.02 versus 5.0%±0.30; P<0.01) were observed. By day 21, the proportion of SA-ß-Gal-positive cells in no-Td and Td/GFP EPCs was markedly increased versus Td/hTERT (no-Td versus Td/hTERT versus Td/GFP, 25.2%±0.4 versus 5.4%±0.2 versus 24.2%±0.5; P<0.01) (Figure 3A and 3B). The results suggest that hTERT expression facilitates delay in senescence.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Senescence assay. A, EPC senescence was evaluated by acidic-ß-gal staining. Representative photomicrographs show SA-ß-gal-positive cells (blue) in no-Tds, Td/hTERTs, and Td/GFPs at day 21. B, Quantification of ß-gal-positive cells was performed in no-Tds, Td/hTERTs, and Td/GFPs at days 8, 14, and 21, respectively. The number of blue cells was manually counted from a total of 2000 cells. By day 21, the proportion of SA-ß-Gal-positive cells in no-Tds and Td/GFPs was markedly increased versus Td/hTERTs. A statistically significant reduction in ß-gal-positive (senescent) cells was documented among Td/hTERT EPCs at days 14 and 21.

Effect of hTERT Overexpression on EPC Differentiation
The finding of enhanced EPC differentiation also supports the contribution of hTERT overexpression. During long-term follow-up, colonies of tdEC were observed at day 30 only in Ad/TERT-transduced EPCs, whereas no-Td and Td/GFP cells detached before day 30, yielding no colonies in either group at this time point (Figure 4A). Incorporation of acLDL-DiI was evaluated to distinguish functional difference between tdECs and undifferentiated cells. The centrally located tdECs were identified by typically less intense uptake of acLDL-DiI versus the peripherally located, intensely stained, undifferentiated cells (Figure 4B). Colonies of tdECs formed sheetlike monolayers; the maximum number of colonies averaged 38 per 35-mm well (Figure 4C). The tdECs also formed capillary-like structures when reseeded in Matrigel (Figure 4D). The tdECs were equivalent to control differentiated ECs (human umbilical vein ECs and human microvascular ECs), both in terms of capillary-like response in Matrigel and of FACS analysis of endothelial surface molecule expression (data not shown). Follow-up (40 days) of Td/hTERT and Td/GFP EPCs disclosed no evidence of neoplastic transformation, including neither loss of contact inhibition nor unchecked cellular proliferation.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Assay of EPC differentiation. A, The colony appearance of tdECs was detected up to day 30 only in Ad/TERT-transduced EPCs. Upper panels show phase-contrast photomicrographs of the colony appearance of tdECs. B, acLDL-DiI incorporation: undifferentiated EPCs at the perimeter incorporated more acLDL-DiI than centrally located tdECs. The photo was taken 1 hour after adding acLDL-DiI. C, Number of colonies consisting of tdECs at day 30. Maximum number of colonies was m=38 per 35-mm well. Colonies were detected only in Td/hTERT culture dishes. P<0.001 vs Td/GFP and no-Td. D, Representative findings of tube formation assay. At day 30, 5x104 tdECs were seeded on Matrigel-coated plates. The EGM-2 media was supplemented with VEGF and incubated at 37°C for 12 to 24 hours. Tube formation was imaged by use of an inverted phase contrast microscope. Photos were taken 12 hours after reseeding. Right panel is a higher magnification of the left panel.

EPC Mitogenic and Migratory Activity After hTERT Overexpression
The impact of hTERT overexpression on regenerative potential was apparent from analysis of angiogenic profiles in hTERT overexpressing EPCs. MTS assay demonstrated that mitogenic potential after Td/hTERT transduction exceeded that in Td/GFP at day 8 (0.62±0.02, 0.53±0.01, respectively; P<0.001) (Figure 5A). Similarly, migratory activity in EPCs after hTERT transduction was analyzed in a modified Boyden chamber assay. VEGF-induced cell migration was markedly enhanced by hTERT overexpression (Td/hTERT versus Td/GFP, 292±12 versus 174±6 cells/4 fields, respectively; P<0.001) (Figure 5B).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. In vitro analyses after EPC transduction. A, Proliferative activity assay at day 8. The increase in mitogenic response of Td/hTERT was statistically significant in comparison with Td/GFP (P<0.001 vs Td/GFP). (TERT indicates Td/hTERT; GFP, Td/GFP) B, Migratory activity assay at day 8. Migratory effect induced by VEGF was statistically increased in Td/hTERT compared with Td/GFP (P<0.001 vs Td/GFP).

EPC Survival After hTERT Transduction
The effect of hTERT modulation on EPC resistance to apoptosis was also evaluated. Immunofluorescent staining with Annexin-V and Hoechst33342 established that starvation-induced EPC apoptosis was markedly reduced after hTERT gene transfer. MTS assay (shown in Figure 5A) also supported these results. This outcome was amplified after VEGF administration (Figure 6).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Apoptosis assay. A, Representative images show cell survival effects as a function of hTERT transduction and VEGF administration. Double staining was performed with Annexin-V (green) and propidium iodide (red). Day-7 cultured EPCs were transduced with hTERT or GFP, depleted of serum for 24 hours, and stimulated with 100 ng/mL of VEGF or vehicle. Evidence of apoptosis by staining for Annexin -V, propidium iodide, or both is reduced in TERT-EPCs. This outcome was amplified after VEGF administration. B, Representative images show cell survival effects by use of Hoechst33342 staining. Numbers on figures correspond to numbers indicated on accompanying table. The numbers of pyknotic nuclei identified by Hoechst-positive staining are reduced among TERT-EPCs. This outcome was amplified after VEGF administration. C, Quantitative analysis of VEGF-induced EPC survival by counting pyknotic nuclei stained by Hoechst33342. VEGF induced cell survival, and hTERT enhanced cell survival effect (P<0.01, VEGF-Td/GFP vs VEGF-Td/hTERT).

Physiological Impact In Vivo After Transplantation of hTERT-Transduced EPCs
Given the impact on regenerative features, EPC transplantation was performed to assess the corresponding physiological impact in vivo after hTERT gene modification. After 1-week ex vivo expansion, 1.5x104 human EPCs were transduced with Ad/TERT or Ad/GFP and administered intravenously to athymic nude mice with unilateral hindlimb ischemia (n=18 each). Compared with mice transplanted with Td/GFP, mice transplanted with Td/TERT demonstrated enhanced perfusion measured by LDPI (0.77±0.10 versus 0.47±0.06 in arbitrary units measured by LDPI; P=0.02) (Figure 7B). The physiological relevance of this finding was underscored by the fact that salvage of the ischemic limb was significantly improved among mice transplanted with Td/TERT versus Td/GFP (P<0.01) (Figure 7A). Capillary density, evaluated in histologic sections retrieved at day 28 from ischemic hindlimb muscle, was markedly increased in mice receiving Td/TERT versus Td/GFP (224±78 versus 90±40 capillaries/mm2; P<0.01) (Figure 7D). Animals treated with Td/TERT or Td/GFP EPCs disclosed no evidence of neoplastic transformation.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Therapeutic efficiency of Td/hTERT and Td/GFP EPCs in murine model of hindlimb ischemia. All data reflect analyses performed 28 days after administration of transduced EPCs. A, Impact on hindlimb integrity. Administration of Td/hTERT increased limb salvage (ie, neither toe nor limb necrosis) compared with that of controls transduced with a reporter (GFP) gene (P<0.01 Td/TERT vs Td/GFP). B, LDPI performed at day 28. Compared with mice transplanted with Td/GFP, mice transplanted with Td/TERT demonstrated enhanced perfusion measured by LDPI (0.77±0.10 vs 0.47±0.06 in arbitrary units measured by LDPI; P=0.02) C, Histologic evidence of neovascularization in ischemic hindlimb. Representative photomicrographs of capillaries in tissue sections from muscle of ischemic legs stained with alkaline phosphatase. D, Quantification of capillary density. The extent of neovascularization was assessed by measuring capillary density in light microscopic sections prepared from muscles of ischemic hindlimbs. Capillary density was significantly greater in hindlimbs of mice receiving Td/hTERT (P<0.01 vs Td/GFP).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We have challenged the otherwise inevitable reduction of telomerase activity in human EPCs by performing gene transfer to achieve constitutive expression of hTERT in these somatic progenitor cells. Constitutive expression of hTERT led to conservation of telomerase activity and delay in senescence, as well as enhanced EPC regenerative properties, including mitogenesis, migration, and EPC survival. EPC differentiation colony assay also disclosed distinct consequences of hTERT transduction of EPCs. Differentiated colonies appeared only among hTERT-expressing EPCs. One possible mechanism of the hTERT effect on EPC differentiation may involve delay in senescence related to cell culture shock.35 Aging is one of the factors that might affect senescence; eg, EPCs from older people might go into senescence more rapidly than do EPCs used in the current experiments. Further investigation concerning time course in EPC senescence should be necessary. The in vivo experiments described here may be interpreted to constitute proof of concept that indirect gene transfer may facilitate therapeutic applications of EPC transplantation. The dose of EPCs used in the current in vivo experiments was 30x less than that required in previous experiments designed to improve the rate of limb salvage.7 Moreover, GFP overexpression did not affect on EPC functions because of the equivalent finding of GFP-transduced EPCs and nontransduced EPCs with cell senescence and migratory and mitogenic activities. Thus, Td/hTERT EPC gene transfer constitutes one option to address the relative paucity of EPCs that can be isolated from peripheral blood before ex vivo expansion and subsequent autologous readministration.

We have questioned if hTERT-expressing cells acquired characteristics of cancer cells, such as chromosomal abnormalities, anchorage-independent growth in culture, or tumorigenicity in immunodeficient mice. There was no observation of such neoplasticity, however, after hTERT transduction by adenovirus constructs. The ectopic hTERT expression by adenovirus transduction was limited within 4 weeks and did not bring immortalization on EPCs. The stability of endothelial lineage cell after hTERT overexpression was also supported by the findings that hTERT-transduced differentiated ECs exhibited neither evidence of malignant transformation nor loss of functional and morphogenetic characteristics of the parental cells.22 We are paying attention to every possibility for applying this approach to any experimental or clinical application.

The augmented neovascularization observed after therapeutic transplantation of hTERT overexpressing EPCs is consistent with the favorable impact of hTERT gene transfer on the angiogenic profiles of EPCs in the in vitro experiments. As foci of injured organs are exposed to diverse physiological and pathological stress, replication and differentiation of certain cells (particularly stem and/or progenitor cells) may be required to initiate and complete tissue regeneration. The concept of "rejuvenating" EPCs via delay in senescence and enhanced regenerative properties may thus have therapeutic implications for vascular disorders, including myocardial ischemia and lower extremity, in which the viability of these and fully differentiated ECs is recurrently subjected to a variety of individual and environmental stress factors.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Peter Lewis Foundation, and the American Heart Association. Dr Asahara is supported in part by New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization. Dr Murasawa is a recipient of a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Postdoctoral Fellowships for Research Abroad.


*    Footnotes
 
{dagger}Deceased. Back

Received April 8, 2002; revision received June 11, 2002; accepted June 11, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH, et al. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998; 92: 362–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, et al. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, et al. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gunsilius E, Duba HC, Petzer AL, et al. Evidence from a leukaemia model for maintenance of vascular endothelium by bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Lancet. 2000; 355: 1688–1691.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, et al. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 634–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, et al. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 3422–3427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Iwaguro H, Yamaguchi J, Kalka C, et al. Endothelial progenitor cell vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer for vascular regeneration. Circulation. 2002; 105: 732–738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature. 1990; 345: 458–460.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hastie ND, Dempster M, Dunlop MG, et al. Telomere reduction in human colorectal carcinoma and with ageing. Nature. 1990; 346: 866–868.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Wright WE, Shay JW. The two-stage mechanism controlling cellular senescence and immortalization. Exp Gerontol. 1992; 27: 383–389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Greider CW. Telomeres, telomerase and senescence. Bioessays. 1990; 12: 363–369.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Nakamura TM, Morin GB, Chapman KB, et al. Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human. Science. 1997; 277: 955–959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Harrington L, Zhou W, McPhail T, et al. Human telomerase contains evolutionarily conserved catalytic and structural subunits. Genes Dev. 1997; 11: 3109–3115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kilian A, Bowtell DD, Abud HE, et al. Isolation of a candidate human telomerase catalytic subunit gene, which reveals complex splicing patterns in different cell types. Hum Mol Genet. 1997; 6: 2011–2019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Meyerson M, Counter CM, Eaton EN, et al. hEST2, the putative human telomerase catalytic subunit gene, is up-regulated in tumor cells and during immortalization. Cell. 1997; 90: 785–795.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kolquist KA, Ellisen LW, Counter CM, et al. Expression of TERT in early premalignant lesions and a subset of cells in normal tissues. Nat Genet. 1998; 19: 182–186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Hayflick L, Moorhead P. The serial cultivation of human diploid strains. Exp Cell Res. 1961; 25: 585–621.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Bodnar AG, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, et al. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science. 1998; 279: 349–352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jiang XR, Jimenez G, Chang E, et al. Telomerase expression in human somatic cells does not induce changes associated with a transformed phenotype. Nat Genet. 1999; 21: 111–114.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Morales CP, Holt SE, Ouellette M, et al. Absence of cancer-associated changes in human fibroblasts immortalized with telomerase. Nat Genet. 1999; 21: 115–118.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Yang J, Chang E, Cherry AM, et al. Human endothelial cell life extension by telomerase expression. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 26141–26148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Matsushita H, Chang E, Glassford AJ, et al. eNOS activity is reduced in senescent human endothelial cells: preservation by hTERT immortalization. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 793–798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Asahara T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, et al. VEGF contributes to postnatal neovascularization by mobilizing bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3964–3972.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. He TC, Zhou S, da Costa LT, et al. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 2509–2514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Miyake S, Makimura M, Kanegae Y, et al. Efficient generation of recombinant adenoviruses using adenovirus DNA-terminal protein complex and a cosmid bearing the full-length virus genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 1320–1324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Vasa M, Breitschopf K, Zeiher AM, et al. Nitric oxide activates telomerase and delays endothelial cell senescence. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 540–542.[Free Full Text]
  28. Kureishi Y, Luo Z, Shiojima I, et al. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin activates the protein kinase Akt and promotes angiogenesis in normocholesterolemic animals. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 1004–1010.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Couffinhal T, Silver M, Zheng LP, et al. Mouse model of angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1998; 152: 1667–1679.[Abstract]
  30. Murohara T, Asahara T, Silver M, et al. Nitric oxide synthase modulates angiogenesis in response to tissue ischemia. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 2567–2578.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Rivard A, Silver M, Chen D, et al. Rescue of diabetes-related impairment of angiogenesis by intramuscular gene therapy with adeno-VEGF. Am J Pathol. 1999; 154: 355–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wardell K, Jakobsson A, Nilsson GE. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging by dynamic light scattering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993; 40: 309–316.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Linden M, Sirsjo A, Lindbom L, et al. Laser-Doppler perfusion imaging of microvascular blood flow in rabbit tenuissimus muscle. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269: H1496–H1500.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Couffinhal T, Silver M, Kearney M, et al. Impaired collateral vessel development associated with reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in ApoE-/- mice. Circulation. 1999; 99: 3188–3198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sherr CJ, DePinho RA. Cellular senescence: mitotic clock or culture shock? Cell. 2000; 102: 407–410.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. R. Ward and D. J. Stewart
Erythropoietin and mesenchymal stromal cells in angiogenesis and myocardial regeneration: one plus one equals three?
Cardiovasc Res, June 25, 2008; (2008) cvn153v2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Dimmeler and A. Leri
Aging and Disease as Modifiers of Efficacy of Cell Therapy
Circ. Res., June 6, 2008; 102(11): 1319 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Kinnaird, E. Stabile, S. Zbinden, M.-S. Burnett, and S. E. Epstein
Cardiovascular risk factors impair native collateral development and may impair efficacy of therapeutic interventions
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
D. F. Alvarez, L. Huang, J. A. King, M. K. ElZarrad, M. C. Yoder, and T. Stevens
Lung microvascular endothelium is enriched with progenitor cells that exhibit vasculogenic capacity
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): L419 - L430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. Tang, J. Lu, J. P. Walterscheid, H.-H. Chen, D. A. Engler, T. Sawamura, P.-Y. Chang, H. J. Safi, C.-Y. Yang, and C.-H. Chen
Electronegative LDL circulating in smokers impairs endothelial progenitor cell differentiation by inhibiting Akt phosphorylation via LOX-1
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 33 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. W. Losordo, R. A. Schatz, C. J. White, J. E. Udelson, V. Veereshwarayya, M. Durgin, K. K. Poh, R. Weinstein, M. Kearney, M. Chaudhry, et al.
Intramyocardial Transplantation of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells for Intractable Angina: A Phase I/IIa Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Circulation, June 26, 2007; 115(25): 3165 - 3172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Kubo, T.-S. Li, R. Suzuki, M. Ohshima, S.-L. Qin, and K. Hamano
Short-term pretreatment with low-dose hydrogen peroxide enhances the efficacy of bone marrow cells for therapeutic angiogenesis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2582 - H2588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. J. Fuster and V. Andres
Telomere Biology and Cardiovascular Disease
Circ. Res., November 24, 2006; 99(11): 1167 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Hamada, M. K. Kim, A. Iwakura, M. Ii, T. Thorne, G. Qin, J. Asai, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Sekiguchi, M. Silver, et al.
Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} Mediate Contribution of Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Functional Recovery After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 21, 2006; 114(21): 2261 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
H. Fujii, S.-H. Li, P. E. Szmitko, P. W.M. Fedak, and S. Verma
C-Reactive Protein Alters Antioxidant Defenses and Promotes Apoptosis in Endothelial Progenitor Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2006; 26(11): 2476 - 2482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. Ishikawa, M. Eguchi, M. Wada, Y. Iwami, K. Tono, H. Iwaguro, H. Masuda, T. Tamaki, and T. Asahara
Establishment of a Functionally Active Collagen-Binding Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Fusion Protein In Situ
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(9): 1998 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Qin, R. Kishore, C. M. Dolan, M. Silver, A. Wecker, C. N. Luedemann, T. Thorne, A. Hanley, C. Curry, L. Heyd, et al.
Cell cycle regulator E2F1 modulates angiogenesis via p53-dependent transcriptional control of VEGF
PNAS, July 18, 2006; 103(29): 11015 - 11020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. Kobayashi, T. Kondo, N. Inoue, M. Aoki, M. Mizuno, K. Komori, J. Yoshida, and T. Murohara
Combination of In Vivo Angiopoietin-1 Gene Transfer and Autologous Bone Marrow Cell Implantation for Functional Therapeutic Angiogenesis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1465 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T.-S. Li, A. Furutani, M. Takahashi, M. Ohshima, S.-L. Qin, T. Kobayashi, H. Ito, and K. Hamano
Impaired potency of bone marrow mononuclear cells for inducing therapeutic angiogenesis in obese diabetic rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1362 - H1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. G.P. Welt and D. W. Losordo
Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Curb Your Enthusiasm?
Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): 1272 - 1274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
D. M. Smadja, I. Bieche, G. Uzan, H. Bompais, L. Muller, C. Boisson-Vidal, M. Vidaud, M. Aiach, and P. Gaussem
PAR-1 Activation on Human Late Endothelial Progenitor Cells Enhances Angiogenesis In Vitro With Upregulation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 System
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2321 - 2327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Nishiyama, K. Takaji, K. Kataoka, Y. Kurihara, M. Yoshimura, A. Kato, H. Ogawa, and H. Kurihara
Id1 Gene Transfer Confers Angiogenic Property on Fully Differentiated Endothelial Cells and Contributes to Therapeutic Angiogenesis
Circulation, November 1, 2005; 112(18): 2840 - 2850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Gulati and R. D. Simari
Cell Therapy for Angiogenesis: Embracing Diversity
Circulation, September 13, 2005; 112(11): 1522 - 1524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. A. Ingram, N. M. Caplice, and M. C. Yoder
Unresolved questions, changing definitions, and novel paradigms for defining endothelial progenitor cells
Blood, September 1, 2005; 106(5): 1525 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Siepe, C. Heilmann, P. von Samson, P. Menasche, and F. Beyersdorf
Stem cell research and cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 318 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. J. Dzau, M. Gnecchi, A. S. Pachori, F. Morello, and L. G. Melo
Therapeutic Potential of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Cardiovascular Diseases
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 7 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
H.-J. Cho, S.-W. Youn, S.-I. Cheon, T.-Y. Kim, J. Hur, S.-Y. Zhang, S. P. Lee, K.-W. Park, M.-M. Lee, Y.-S. Choi, et al.
Regulation of Endothelial Cell and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Survival and Vasculogenesis by Integrin-Linked Kinase
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1154 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]