(Circulation. 2003;108:3157-3163.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From The Heart and Vascular Research Center and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Correspondence to David S. Rosenbaum, MD, Director, Heart and Vascular Research Center, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Hamman 322, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998. E-mail drosenbaum{at}metrohealth.org
Received May 23, 2003; revision received August 8, 2003; accepted August 14, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results High-resolution optical mapping was used to measure conduction velocity (CV) and action potential duration from ventricular epicardium of Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts at baseline (pH 7.4) and during 45 minutes of perfusion with acidotic (pH 6.0) Tyrodes solution with (n=8) and without (control, n=7) ZP123 (80 nmol/L). Acidosis produced conduction slowing transverse (29.1±0.1 to 16.8±0.2 cm/s, P<0.0001) and longitudinal (47.2±2.4 to 33.2±4.8 cm/s, P<0.0001) to cardiac fibers. Importantly, ZP123 inhibited conduction slowing during acidosis by approximately 60%. The peak effect of ZP123 was achieved after 16 minutes of acidosis, consistent with inhibition of uncoupling. ZP123 did not affect Na+ current in isolated myocytes, additionally affirming that preservation of CV was attributable to the compounds action on gap junctions. ZP123 had no effect on CV in the absence of acidosis, suggesting that drug activity targets gap junctions under metabolic stress. Action potential duration heterogeneity was significantly reduced by ZP123 (6.7±0.8 ms) compared with controls (9.7±3.1 ms, P<0.05), presumably by enhancing cell-to-cell coupling.
Conclusions These data suggest that ZP123 significantly attenuates gap junction closure during acidosis. Preservation of intercellular coupling diminished CV slowing and heterogeneous repolarization, eliminating arrhythmogenic substrates.
Key Words: electrophysiology mapping ischemia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, the novel peptide ZP123 was shown to promote electrical coupling between ventricular myocytes without changing membrane conductance.13 This peptide is closely related to the compound AAP-10,14 which enhances gap junction conductance.15 Interestingly, ZP123 was also reported to reduce the rate of inducible ventricular tachycardia during acute ischemia in dogs, suggesting an antiarrhythmic effect associated with the targeting of gap junctions.13 However, the effects of ZP123 on conduction and repolarization properties of the intact heart remain unknown.
We hypothesize that ZP123 will produce electrophysiological effects at the whole-heart level that would be predictive of a novel class of antiarrhythmic drugs that target gap junctions (ie, prevent CV slowing and inhomogeneous repolarization), that the effects on conduction would be attributable to actions on gap junctions rather than sodium channels, and that the drug does not exhibit potentially proarrhythmic side effects, such as prolongation of repolarization. The results of this study suggest that pharmacological modification of gap junction conductance might provide a viable and novel approach for antiarrhythmic drug development.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
resistance) were filled with (in mmol/L) CsF 120, EGTA 11, MgCl2 2, and HEPES 10; pH 7.2. External solution was (in mmol/L) NaCl 20, N-methyl D-glucamine 120, CsCl 5.0, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 2, NiCl2 1; glucose 10, and HEPES 10; pH 7.35. Ionic current density (pA/pF) was calculated from the ratio of current amplitude to cell capacitance.
High-Resolution Optical Mapping in Langendorff-Perfused Hearts
As described in detail elsewhere,19,20 adult guinea pig hearts were perfused as Langendorff preparations with oxygenated Tyrodes solution at 31±1°C. The right atrium was removed to avoid competitive stimulation from the sinoatrial node. Hearts were stained with the voltage-sensitive dye di-4-ANEPPS (15 mmol/L) and then positioned in a chamber such that the recording area was centered over a 14.2x14.2-mm region of left ventricular epicardium, 5 mm lateral to the left anterior descending coronary artery, halfway between the apex and base. The epicardial surface of the left ventricle was stimulated with a unipolar electrode placed in the center of the recording region.21 Gentle pressure was applied to the posterior surface of the heart with a movable piston to stabilize the heart against the imaging window. Contraction artifacts were eliminated with diacetyl monoxime (10 mmol/L). Cardiac rhythm was monitored via 3 silver disc electrodes fixed to the chamber in positions corresponding to limb leads I, II, and III.
Briefly, action potentials were optically recorded from 256 sites (0.89-mm interpixel resolution) on the anterior epicardial surface of the ventricle, as described previously.1921 Fluorescence was excited with a 270-W tungsten-halogen light source (filtered 514±20 nm) and transmitted to a 16x16-element photodiode array detector through a tandem-lens imaging system (emission filter >610 nm).10 Photocurrent from each photodiode underwent current-to-voltage conversion, amplification (x200), and bandpass filtering (0.1 to 500 Hz) and was multiplexed and digitized (1000 samples/sec per channel) with 12-bit precision.
Experimental Protocol
Isolated Myocytes
Isolated myocytes from guinea pig hearts were randomized into 2 groups, ZP123 and no drug. Action potential recordings were made from 7 unique cells in each group, whereas 6 different cells per group were used to measure INa. In both groups, cells were first patched and superfused in the control solution given above. In the ZP123 group, bath solution was then changed to include 80 nmol/L ZP123. In both groups, the bath solution was then made acidotic (pH 6.8). Recordings were obtained 10 minutes after each solution change to allow equilibration of the bath solution.
Langendorff Hearts
As shown in Figure 1, Langendorff hearts were randomized to 2 groups, ZP123 (n=8) and no drug (n=7). In both groups, hearts were allowed to equilibrate for 18 minutes while being perfused with normal Tyrodes solution (baseline). Hearts were then perfused with either 80 nmol/L ZP123 (ZP123 group) or deionized water vehicle (no drug group) for 12 minutes. Subsequently, the perfusion buffer was made acidotic (pH 6.0) for 45 minutes in both groups. Action potential maps were obtained during constant cycle-length stimulation (400 ms) at 4-minute intervals during each experimental phase (Figure 1, arrows).
|
Data Analysis
Data analysis was performed using custom software designed for the analysis of optically recorded action potentials. Action potential depolarization and repolarization time were determined using predefined criteria, as described previously.19,20 APD was calculated during each intervention as the time interval between local depolarization and repolarization. APD dispersion was defined as the standard deviation of all APDs measured in the mapping area. CV was calculated with respect to fiber orientation using an average of velocity vectors along the conduction path, as described previously.10 Comparisons were made between groups using the Student t test, except where noted otherwise. All values are reported as mean±SD. P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
ZP123 had no effect on whole-cell INa (Figure 3, top). Acidosis produced a rightward shift in the current-voltage relationship for INa to the same extent in both ZP123 and no-drug groups, reaffirming that ZP123 does not affect INa, irrespective of pH. These results suggest that any effect of ZP123 on CV cannot be explained by an effect on INa.
|
ZP123 Attenuates Dispersion of Repolarization
Action potentials recorded from Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts are shown in Figure 4. Action potentials demonstrate no change in morphology or duration from baseline during perfusion with vehicle or ZP123, additionally indicating the absence of an effect of the drug on membrane currents. As expected, acidosis prolonged APD in hearts from both ZP123 and no-drug groups. These results were consistently observed in all hearts, producing on average a 19% increase in APD during acidosis in both the ZP123 (184±14 to 218±13, P<0.005) and no drug (178±16 to 212±20, P<0.005) groups, whereas there were no differences between groups. Although ZP123 had no apparent effect on acidosis-induced APD prolongation, ZP123 significantly attenuated acidosis-induced increases in APD dispersion. As shown in Figure 5 (no-drug group), acidosis produced a nearly 2-fold increase in APD dispersion, as expected from its effect on cell-to-cell coupling.12 Pretreatment with ZP123 eliminated the acidosis-induced APD dispersion (ZP123 group). Interestingly, in the absence of acidosis, ZP123 did not effect APD dispersion, indicating that ZP123 only promotes gap junction coupling during metabolic stress.
|
|
ZP123 Enhances CV During Acidosis
Representative isochrone maps of ventricular propagation from a point stimulus demonstrate that acidosis clearly slowed CV (Figure 6A versus 6B), evident from both the relative crowding of isochrones and the increased time between action potential upstrokes during acidosis compared with baseline. Interestingly, ZP123 did not affect impulse propagation during baseline conditions (Figure 6A versus 6C) but substantially attenuated CV slowing during acidosis (Figure 6C versus 6D). The effect of ZP123 on conduction is summarized for all experiments in Figure 7. CV for each heart is normalized to its value measured just before perfusion with acidotic Tyrodes solution. In the no-drug group, CV progressively and significantly slowed during the period of acidosis, reaching a plateau after approximately 30 minutes. CV slowing was slightly more pronounced transverse to fibers (
40%) than longitudinal (
30%), resulting in a trend toward greater anisotropy of conduction. Both the time course of conduction changes and the changes in anisotropy are consistent with an effect of acidosis on intercellular coupling.2,3 Importantly, during acidosis, CV slowing in the ZP123-treated preparations was significantly attenuated both longitudinal and transverse to fibers (P<0.05, by 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni/Dunn post hoc analysis). There was relative preservation of CV during acidosis in the ZP123 group, which became significant at 16 minutes and persisted throughout the duration of the experiment. These results, taken in conjunction with the absence of an effect of ZP123 on INa or isolated myocyte action potentials, strongly support a mechanism of action of ZP123 on intercellular communication, presumably through the targeting of cardiac gap junctions.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clearly, in addition to its effect on gap junctions, ischemia produces numerous changes in cellular electrophysiology.2325 To isolate the effects of ischemia on gap junction coupling, we used an experimental model of extracellular acidosis. Conditions of low intracellular pH are known to promote uncoupling in isolated oocytes and cell pairs.4,6 In intact tissue, it is possible to manipulate extracellular pH to modulate gap junction coupling. Although we did not measure intracellular pH, we used a similar level of extracellular acidosis found to produce uncoupling previously.3,26,27 The data presented in this report are consistent with this time course of uncoupling, because the ZP123 effect on conduction first became significant at 16 minutes (Figure 7).
The precise mechanism by which ZP123 modulates gap junction function remains unknown and cannot be fully ascertained from our results. The significant effect on conduction during acidosis but not at baseline (Figure 6) suggests that ZP123 only affects gap junctions under conditions of metabolic stress. The preservation of conduction during acidosis suggests an effect of ZP123 related to maintenance of gap junctions in their open state, possibly by interfering with the particle-receptor binding mechanism of connexin43.4 Additional studies are required to determine whether ZP123 can open or restore function to gap junctions that have already closed. More fundamental to this discussion is the identification of the binding target for the compound. It is not known whether ZP123 interacts with membrane-bound ligands or if it crosses the cell membrane and binds directly to connexin protein complexes or signaling molecules.
ZP123 enhances CV during acidosis while having no effect on sodium channels in single cells. In addition, ZP123 eliminated the acidosis-induced APD dispersion without affecting APD on average. Slow conduction and inhomogeneous repolarization are known to produce a highly arrhythmogenic substrate. By specifically targeting gap junctions, ZP123 counteracted these arrhythmogenic effects, providing evidence for the antiarrhythmic mechanism of this compound. It is interesting to note the fact that although ZP123 had a major effect on APD dispersion during acidosis, the increase in APD during acidosis was the same both with and without ZP123. These findings provide support for ZP123 affecting gap junctions while having no effect on membrane currents.
In general, conduction slowing can be attributed to 1 of 2 mechanisms, diminished cardiac excitability or increased intercellular resistance. In the present report, acidosis produced a slowing of conduction and an increase in APD dispersion. These changes are expected during diminished gap junction coupling.9,11 However, because one cannot rule out an effect of acidosis on excitability, we performed experiments in isolated myocytes to determine the effects of acidosis and ZP123 on INa and the action potential. We found that acidosis produced a rightward shift in the INa current-voltage relationship, providing another mechanism for the acidosis-induced conduction slowing in addition to intercellular uncoupling. However, because acidosis produced identical changes in INa in both the ZP123 and no-drug groups, this mechanism cannot be responsible for the relative preservation of CV in the ZP123 group, leaving modulation of intercellular coupling as the most likely mechanism. The data presented in this report also support the lack of any effect of ZP123 on sarcolemmal ion channels, because there was no difference in action potential parameters between the ZP123 and no-drug groups. In addition, previous studies have shown that ZP123 has a low binding affinity for ion channels, additionally indicating that this compound is unlike conventional antiarrhythmic drugs.13
To further develop antiarrhythmic strategies based on targeting of gap junctions, it is critically important to better understand the specific effects of gap junction function and expression on the cardiac arrhythmogenesis. Clearly, spatial dispersion of repolarization promotes susceptibility to reentrant arrhythmias.28 There are at least 2 mechanisms by which enhanced intercellular coupling from pharmacological targeting of cardiac gap junctions can reduce spatial dispersions of repolarization. First, greater electrical coupling between cells reduces differences in APD between cells possessing different ionic composition across the heart by increasing electrotonic current flow between neighboring cells.11,12 Second, restoration of electrical coupling will reduce differences in depolarization times between cells by enhancing conduction, thereby diminishing spatial gradients of activation.19 When expressing CV in terms of activation gradients (CV=1/activation gradient), we found that increased APD dispersion accounted for a greater portion (61%) of acidosis-induced dispersion of repolarization than conduction slowing (39%). Similarly, when comparing the no-drug group with the ZP123 group, the action of ZP123 to ameliorate potentially arrhythmogenic dispersions of repolarization was attributable to a greater extent to its effect on homogenizing APD gradients between cells rather than its effect on enhancing conduction. Because APD gradients are independent of the direction of propagation,19 the effect of ZP123 on overall dispersion of repolarization is not expected to be influenced to a large extent by propagation direction. ZP123 did not affect average APD, because the increased electrical coupling it caused between cells both reduced and prolonged APD in cells possessing the longest and shortest APDs, respectively.
There are other potentially important antiarrhythmic actions of ZP123 that should be considered. The prevention of greater than 2-fold slowing of CV by ZP123 could itself be highly antiarrhythmic (Figure 7). Uncoupling may also serve to organize and stabilize reentrant circuits by increasing the critical curvature of the excitatory wavefront. Finally, restoration of intercellular coupling may also prevent arrhythmogenic discordant alternans between cells.20 The present study may provide an electrophysiological basis for earlier observations of suppression of ventricular tachycardia by ZP123 during acute ischemia.,13 Additional studies are required to determine whether ZP123 possesses antiarrhythmic properties in other disease models.
Traditional antiarrhythmic drugs target 1 or more sarcolemmal ion channels to modify the properties of conduction and repolarization at the single-cell level. The fact that most antiarrhythmic compounds not only fail to prevent arrhythmias but may actually promote arrhythmias (ie, are proarrhythmic) provides significant impetus for developing fundamentally different approaches to the pharmacological suppression of arrhythmias. Because many disease states that predispose to arrhythmias are known to substantially effect gap junction expression and function,13,2931 drugs like ZP123 that target gap junctions offer the potential for a novel strategy for antiarrhythmic drug therapy without its well-recognized proarrhythmic side-effects. Because ZP123 did not affect cellular repolarization (Figures 2 and 4
), it is unlikely that treatment would result in proarrhythmia from acquired LQTS. However, earlier reports by some investigators32 but not others33 have suggested that pharmacological uncoupling can organize fibrillation wave fronts, therefore suggesting, theoretically, that the restoration of intercellular coupling might destabilize reentry and be proarrhythmic. In this light, it is apparent that considerable additional study is required to determine whether such a strategy is effective and safe for clinical use.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Dr Rosenbaum serves as a consultant to Zealand Pharmaceuticals.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kleber AG, Riegger CB, Janse MJ. Electrical uncoupling and increases of extracellular resistance after induction of ischemia in isolated, arterially perfused rabbit papillary muscle. Circ Res. 1987; 61: 271279.
3. Beardslee MA, Lerner DL, Tadros PN, et al. Dephosphorylation and intracellular redistribution of ventricular connexin43 during electrical uncoupling induced by ischemia. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 656662.
4. Morley GE, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Intramolecular interactions mediate pH regulation of connexin 43 channels. Biophys J. 1996; 70: 12941302.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Hermans MMP, Kortekaas P, Jongsma HJ, et al. pH sensitivity of the cardiac gap junction proteins, connexin 45 and 43. Pflugers Arch. 1995; 431: 138140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Noma A, Tsuboi N. Dependents of junctional conductance on proton, calcium and magnesium ions in cardiac paired cells of guinea pig. J Physiol (Lond). 1987; 382: 193211.
7. DeMello WC. Effect of intracellular injection of calcium and strontium on cell communication in heart. J Physiol. 1975; 250: 231245.
8. Daleau P. Lysophosphatidylcholine, a metabolite which accumulates early in myocardium during ischemia, reduces gap junctional coupling in cardiac cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 13911401.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Ionic mechanisms of propagation in cardiac tissue: roles of the sodium and L-type calcium currents during reduced excitability and decreased gap junction coupling. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 727741.
10. Eloff BC, Lerner DL, Yamada KA, et al. High resolution optical mapping reveals conduction slowing in connexin43 deficient mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 681690.
11. Viswanathan PC, Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Effects of IKr and IKs heterogeneity on action potential duration and its rate dependence: a simulation study. Circulation. 1999; 99: 24662474.
12. Lesh MD, Pring M, Spear JF. Cellular uncoupling can unmask dispersion of action potential duration in ventricular myocardium: a computer modeling study. Circ Res. 1989; 65: 14261440.
13. Xing D, Kjolbye AL, Nielsen MS, et al. ZP123 increases gap junctional conductance and prevents reentrant ventricular tachycardia during myocardial ischemia in open chest dogs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14: 510520.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Muller A, Schaefer T, Linke W, et al. Actions of the antiarrhythmic peptide AAP10 on intercellular coupling. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1997; 356: 7682.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Müller A, Gottwald M, Tudyka T, et al. Increase in gap junction conductance by an antiarrhythmic peptide. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997; 327: 6572.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wan X, Bryant SM, Hart G. The effects of [K+]o on regional differences in electrical characteristics of ventricular myocytes in guinea-pig. Exp Physiol. 2000; 85: 769774.[Abstract]
17. Horn R, Korn SJ. Prevention of rundown in electrophysiological recording. Methods Enzymol. 1992; 207: 149155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Wan X, Chen S, Sadeghpour A, et al. Accelerated inactivation in a mutant Na(+) channel associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280: H354H360.
19. Laurita KR, Girouard SD, Rosenbaum DS. Modulation of ventricular repolarization by a premature stimulus: role of epicardial dispersion of repolarization kinetics demonstrated by optical mapping of the intact guinea pig heart. Circ Res. 1996; 79: 493503.
20. Pastore JM, Rosenbaum DS. Role of structural barriers in the mechanism of alternans-induced reentry. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 11571163.
21. Akar FG, Roth BJ, Rosenbaum DS. Optical measurement of cell-to-cell coupling in intact heart using subthreshold electrical stimulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 281: H533H542.
22. Xu Z, Rozanski GJ. Proton inhibition of transient outward potassium current in rat ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997; 29: 481490.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Janse MJ, Wit AL. Electrophysiological mechanism of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction. Physiol Rev. 1989; 69: 10491169.
24. Lee HC, Mohabir R, Smith N, et al. Effect of ischemia on calcium-dependent fluorescence transients in rabbit hearts containing Indo-1: correlation with monophasic action potentials and contraction. Circulation. 1988; 78: 10471059.
25. Mohabir R, Lee HC, Kurz RW, et al. Effects of ischemia and hypercarbic acidosis on myocyte calcium transients, contraction, and pHi in perfused rabbit hearts. Circ Res. 1991; 69: 15251537.
26. Ruiz-Meana M, Garcia-Dorado D, Lane S, et al. Persistence of gap junction communication during myocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280: H2563H2571.
27. Yamada KA, McHowat J, Yan GX, et al. Cellular uncoupling induced by accumulation of long-chain acylcarnitine during ischemia. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 8395.
28. Han J, Moe G. Nonuniform recovery of excitability in ventricular muscle. Circ Res. 1964; 14: 4460.
29. Sepp R, Severs NJ, Gourdie RG. Altered patterns of cardiac intercellular junction distribution in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J. 1996; 76: 412417.
30. Peters NS, Green CR, Poole-Wilson PA, et al. Reduced content of connexin43 gap junctions in ventricular myocardium from hypertrophied and ischemic human hearts. Circulation. 1993; 88: 864875.
31. Yao JA, Hussain W, Patel P, et al. Remodeling of gap junctional channel function in epicardial border zone of healing canine infarcts. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 437443.
32. Qi XQ, Varma P, Newman D, et al. Gap junction blockers decrease defibrillation thresholds without changes in ventricular refractoriness in isolated rabbit hearts. Circulation. 2001; 104: 15441549.
33. Sims JJ, Schoff KL, Loeb JM, et al. Regional gap junction inhibition increases defibrillation thresholds. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 285: H10H16.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-M. Chaldoupi, P. Loh, R. N.W. Hauer, J. M.T. de Bakker, and H. V.M. van Rijen The role of connexin40 in atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2009; 84(1): 15 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Verma, B. D. Larsen, W. Coombs, X. Lin, G. Spagnol, P. L. Sorgen, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar Novel Pharmacophores of Connexin43 Based on the "RXP" Series of Cx43-Binding Peptides Circ. Res., July 17, 2009; 105(2): 176 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hagen, A. Dietze, and S. Dhein Human cardiac gap-junction coupling: effects of antiarrhythmic peptide AAP10 Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2009; 83(2): 405 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Laurent, H. Leong-Poi, I. Mangat, G. W. Moe, X. Hu, P. P.-S. So, E. Tarulli, A. Ramadeen, E. I. Rossman, J. K. Hennan, et al. Effects of Chronic Gap Junction Conduction-Enhancing Antiarrhythmic Peptide GAP-134 Administration on Experimental Atrial Fibrillation in Dogs Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lewandowski, K. Procida, R. Vaidyanathan, W. Coombs, J. Jalife, M. S. Nielsen, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar RXP-E: A Connexin43-Binding Peptide That Prevents Action Potential Propagation Block Circ. Res., August 29, 2008; 103(5): 519 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lin, C. Zemlin, J. K. Hennan, J. S. Petersen, and R. D. Veenstra Enhancement of ventricular gap-junction coupling by rotigaptide Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2008; 79(3): 416 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Ehrlich, P. Biliczki, S. H. Hohnloser, and S. Nattel Atrial-Selective Approaches for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 26, 2008; 51(8): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Wit and H. S. Duffy Drug development for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: targeting the gap junctions Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H16 - H18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Kjolbye, M. Dikshteyn, B. C. Eloff, I. Deschenes, and D. S. Rosenbaum Maintenance of intercellular coupling by the antiarrhythmic peptide rotigaptide suppresses arrhythmogenic discordant alternans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H41 - H49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-q. Zhong, G. Laurent, P. P.-S. So, Xudong Hu, J. K. Hennan, and P. Dorian Effects of Rotigaptide, a Gap Junction Modifier, on Defibrillation Energy and Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest in Rabbits Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2007; 12(1): 69 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Guerra, T. H. Everett IV, K. W. Lee, E. Wilson, and J. E. Olgin Effects of the Gap Junction Modifier Rotigaptide (ZP123) on Atrial Conduction and Vulnerability to Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, July 11, 2006; 114(2): 110 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shibayama, R. Lewandowski, F. Kieken, W. Coombs, S. Shah, P. L. Sorgen, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar Identification of a Novel Peptide That Interferes With the Chemical Regulation of Connexin43 Circ. Res., June 9, 2006; 98(11): 1365 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Hennan, R. E. Swillo, G. A. Morgan, J. C. Keith Jr., R. G. Schaub, R. P. Smith, H. S. Feldman, K. Haugan, J. Kantrowitz, P. J. Wang, et al. Rotigaptide (ZP123) Prevents Spontaneous Ventricular Arrhythmias and Reduces Infarct Size During Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Open-Chest Dogs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 236 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, V. V. Patel, and G. L. Radice Dysregulation of cell adhesion proteins and cardiac arrhythmogenesis. Clin. Med. Res., March 1, 2006; 4(1): 42 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Jorgensen, S. C. Teilmann, Z. Henriksen, E. Meier, S. S. Hansen, J.-E. B. Jensen, O. H. Sorensen, and J. S. Petersen The Antiarrhythmic Peptide Analog Rotigaptide (ZP123) Stimulates Gap Junction Intercellular Communication in Human Osteoblasts and Prevents Decrease in Femoral Trabecular Bone Strength in Ovariectomized Rats Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4745 - 4754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Xing, A. L. Kjolbye, J. S. Petersen, and J. B. Martins Pharmacological stimulation of cardiac gap junction coupling does not affect ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia or triggered activity in dogs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H511 - H516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Poelzing and D. S. Rosenbaum Altered connexin43 expression produces arrhythmia substrate in heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1762 - H1770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |