Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:1445-1447
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121322.91189.2E
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prost-Squarcioni, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prost-Squarcioni, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2004;109:1445-1447.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Focused Perspectives

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathies

Guy Fontaine, MD, PhD; Catherine Prost-Squarcioni, MD, PhD

From the Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. E-mail guy.fontaine{at}bct.ap-hop-paris.fr


Key Words: Focused Perspectives • cardiomyopathy • arrhythmia • defibrillation • cardioversion


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowTerminology
down arrowMolecular Biology
down arrowAntiarrhythmic Drugs
down arrowEquipment Effectiveness
down arrowIndications for ICD in...
down arrowReferences
 
In the present issue of Circulation, Wichter et al1 report the largest single-center experience demonstrating the benefit of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) in the treatment of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). The patients seem well defined, and they meet the task force criteria. In addition, 50 of 60 patients have had the diagnosis confirmed by endocardial biopsy. Advances in molecular biology and genetics, however, suggest that the term ARVC encompasses a large spectrum of diseases with similar clinical presentations and histological features. This was discussed in part in a previous editorial in Circulation.2 Recent information suggests that there is an overlap in the different forms of diseases included under the general term ARVC.

See p 1503


*    Terminology
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Terminology
down arrowMolecular Biology
down arrowAntiarrhythmic Drugs
down arrowEquipment Effectiveness
down arrowIndications for ICD in...
down arrowReferences
 
The term right ventricular cardiomyopathy, which was introduced by the World Heart Federation and World Health Organization in 1996 in the new classification of cardiomyopathies, was selected to encompass arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) and several other clinical entities, some of them known by a different name. In the classical article by Marcus et al,3 the term right ventricular dysplasia was taken from a book chapter on reentrant arrhythmias published in 1977.4 This work reported the results of antiarrhythmic surgery in young male patients with good left ventricular function who had ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating in the right ventricle. The term dysplasia was chosen because the right ventricle of 3 operated patients was covered by fat. The remaining myocardium was present only in the subendocardium. This striking feature, which suggested the replacement of myocardium by fat, was strengthened by microscopic examination that showed strands of cardiomyocytes bordered by or sometimes embedded in fibrosis or adipose tissue. It was suspected that myocardial replacement by fat and fibrous tissue started early in life, possibly in the embryo. This concept was reinforced by a report of the heart of a 24-week-old fetus with arrhythmias in utero.2 The role of apoptosis was also demonstrated as one of the factors contributing to myocardial remodeling in ARVD.5


*    Molecular Biology
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTerminology
*Molecular Biology
down arrowAntiarrhythmic Drugs
down arrowEquipment Effectiveness
down arrowIndications for ICD in...
down arrowReferences
 
In recent years, an extended classification of subgroups of these right ventricular cardiomyopathies has been proposed on the basis of genetic studies.6 This information may impact the selection of patients for ICD therapy on the basis of genotype-phenotype relationship. Among them, Naxos disease was particularly informative because this inherited condition with a recessive form of transmission is associated with clinically obvious ectodermic dysplasia (keratoderma, woolly hair) and has the typical histological pattern of ARVD. This association prompted the identification of a nonsense mutation of a gene coding for a protein (plakoglobin) that could explain both ectodermal manifestations and cardiac dysplasia.7 In another form of the disease identified in Ecuador, presenting clinically as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy without fatty infiltration, a mutation of a gene coding for a protein in the same category of cell–cell adhesion (desmoplakin) was discovered,8 and a mutation on the gene encoding for desmoplakin was identified in the Veneto region of Italy in a familial dominant form of ARVD.9 A third genetic abnormality was identified in Italy in patients with a familial dominant form of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia.10 In these patients, however, the mutation involved the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor).

The right ventricular ST-segment elevation (Brugada syndrome) frequently associated with signs of delayed conduction in the right bundle branch is due to a cardiomyopathy in some cases.11 This syndrome carries the risk of nocturnal sudden death, particularly in young adults. Arrhythmic death is not prevented by antiarrhythmic drugs, with the possible exception of quinidine.12 The sodium channel (SCN5A) was originally involved in 50% of the patients studied. However, the relation between the Brugada syndrome and ARVD is not always clear. Examination of the pathological material in patients with the Brugada syndrome who died suddenly showed that one third had structural heart disease, consisting of fat and fibrosis strongly suggestive of ARVD and/or signs of inflammation. A systematic study of a group of 60 ARVD patients in our center showed that 26% had ST-segment elevation >=1 mm in leads V1 through V3.13 Therefore, there is a significant overlap between ARVD and Brugada syndrome that needs further investigation.

Another form of ventricular arrhythmia frequently observed in the young is right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VT. A few patients who have benign ventricular extrasystoles arising from the RVOT may develop rapid VT degenerating into ventricular fibrillation. These patients are candidates for the implantable defibrillator. However, ablation of the arrhythmic focus involving the Purkinje system was able to prevent recurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias.14 In addition, the autopsy material in one case of RVOT demonstrated the presence of fat and fibrosis in surviving fibers, plus signs of inflammation in the infundibular area, which suggested a localized form of ARVD.6


*    Antiarrhythmic Drugs
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTerminology
up arrowMolecular Biology
*Antiarrhythmic Drugs
down arrowEquipment Effectiveness
down arrowIndications for ICD in...
down arrowReferences
 
In the article by Wichter et al,1 antiarrhythmic drugs were used in 32% after ICD implantation and in 48% at the end of the study. However, only 2 patients were given a drug combination. One could speculate that the rate of appropriate ICD discharges, including those for antitachycardia therapy, might be lower than reported in this series if a combination of antiarrhythmic drugs were used. In our experience, the most effective combination is the combination of amiodarone plus ß-blocking drugs, as used in the Canadian Amiodarone MI Arrhythmia Trial (CAMIAT) and European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT).15 In patients with good left ventricular function, the combination of flecainide with sotalol may be used. One could speculate whether the number of appropriate ICD discharges would have been substantially reduced in a cohort of patients treated with these drug combinations. The answer to this question will require a prospective standardized trial of antiarrhythmic drug combination in patients with ARVD implanted with ICDs.


*    Equipment Effectiveness
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTerminology
up arrowMolecular Biology
up arrowAntiarrhythmic Drugs
*Equipment Effectiveness
down arrowIndications for ICD in...
down arrowReferences
 
The study demonstrates that the ICD therapy is an effective treatment even though it was not a study randomizing patients to ICD treatment or antiarrhythmic drug treatment. Only 2 patients died of an arrhythmia over 80 months. The study also illustrates that ICD therapy is not without its complications in the treatment of the disease. A relatively high incidence of complications would be expected during long-term follow-up of relatively young patients. In addition, a complication that was rather common and almost unique to the treatment of this disease by ICD is the higher pacing thresholds and lower amplitude of endocardial potentials because of diffuse involvement by fat and fibrosis of the right ventricle at the site of ICD lead placement. The implanter needs to be aware of this problem and prepared to use alternative sites, including active fixation of the electrode in the septum, which is generally not involved in this disease process. In addition, this situation may worsen with time because of disease progression and dilatation of the right ventricle.6 Because these patients are in the younger age group, it is anticipated that they will need several generator replacements and are likely have one or more lead changes, as well as lead fracture and premature battery exhaustion. The use of modern leads with the same diameter (isodiametric lead) will greatly facilitate lead withdrawal.

In the report by Wichter et al,1 there is no mention of high defibrillation thresholds. However, we are aware of high defibrillation thresholds in patients with ARVD as well as in the Brugada syndrome. The reason for this situation is unknown. Of note, there is very little right ventricular free wall perforation reported in ARVD. This potential complication would have been expected because of the thinness of right ventricular free wall in ARVD.


*    Indications for ICD in ARVD
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTerminology
up arrowMolecular Biology
up arrowAntiarrhythmic Drugs
up arrowEquipment Effectiveness
*Indications for ICD in...
down arrowReferences
 
A major clinical question that was not completely addressed in this study was whether it would be possible to identify with a high degree of certainty those patients with ARVD who would benefit from ICD implantation on the basis of anticipated knowledge of those who would have an arrhythmic cardiac death. With good left ventricular function, many patients with ARVD can tolerate a rapid ventricular rate, even exceeding 240 bpm, without syncope or near syncope. An alternative analytic approach would be to restrict the high-risk group to those individuals who have VT and who have had syncope or near syncope.

The most frequent and difficult problem in deciding who requires an ICD relates to family members. Wichter et al1 found that electrophysiological study positive for the induction of fast unstable VT/ventricular fibrillation is an independent predictor of life-threatening events during follow-up. Therefore, it is tempting to deduce that VT induction in a family member can be valuable for identifying individuals at risk.

It is hoped that it will be possible to identify patients with ARVD at risk of sudden cardiac death by noninvasive techniques, such as advanced methods of electrocardiography16 and echocardiography, and invasive approaches, such as electrophysiological study and contrast angiography.17

It is also hoped that these questions about risk stratification and indication for ICD therapy in high-risk subgroups of right ventricular cardiomyopathies will be answered with the help of registries. More data prospectively collected from many centers are needed to answer the important questions, on the basis of clinical presentation, genetics, and baseline characteristics, as to who would require ICD therapy. It is hoped that this information will be forthcoming from the two major ARVD registries, the European and the North American Registries. Physicians are encouraged to enter their patients suspected of ARVD into these registries so that we will be able to make a judgment of who requires ICD therapy on the basis of prospectively collected data from a large number of patients.18–21


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work has been supported by grants from the European Commission QLG1-CT-2000-01091, French registry No. 99 b 0691; Le Téléton (AFM) No. 5774; and La Fondation Gustave et Simone Prévot, Genève, Suisse.


*    Footnotes
 
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTerminology
up arrowMolecular Biology
up arrowAntiarrhythmic Drugs
up arrowEquipment Effectiveness
up arrowIndications for ICD in...
*References
 

  1. Wichter T, Paul M, Wollmann C, et al. Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator therapy in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: single-center experience of long-term follow-up and complications in 60 patients. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1503–1508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fontaine G, Fontaliran F, Frank R. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathies: clinical forms and main differential diagnoses. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1532–1535.[Free Full Text]
  3. Marcus FI, Fontaine G, Guiraudon G, et al. Right ventricular dysplasia: a report of 24 cases. Circulation. 1982; 65: 384–399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Fontaine G, Guiraudon G, Frank R, et al. Stimulation studies and epicardial mapping in ventricular tachycardia: study of mechanisms and selection for surgery. In: Kulbertus HE, ed. Re-entrant Arrhythmias: Mechanisms and Treatment. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press; 1977: 334–350.
  5. Mallat Z, Tedgui A, Fontaliran F, et al. Evidence of apoptosis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1190–1196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fontaine G, Fornes P, Hebert JL, et al. Ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathies. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: W.B. Saunders; 2003. In press.
  7. McKoy G, Protonotarios N, Crosby A, et al. Identification of a deletion in plakoglobin in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy with palmoplantar keratoderma and woolly hair (Naxos disease). Lancet. 2000; 355: 2119–2124.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Norgett EE, Hatsell SJ, Carvajal-Huerta L, et al. Recessive mutation in desmoplakin disrupts desmoplakin-intermediate filament interactions and causes dilated cardiomyopathy, woolly hair and keratoderma. Hum Mol Genet. 2000; 9: 2761–2766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rampazzo A, Nava A, Malacrida S, et al. Mutation in human desmoplakin domain binding to plakoglobin causes a dominant form of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71: 1200–1206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Tiso N, Stephan DA, Nava A, et al. Identification of mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene in families affected with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 2 (ARVD2). Hum Mol Genet. 2001; 10: 189–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 1391–1396.[Abstract]
  12. Belhassen B, Viskin S, Fish R, et al. Effects of electrophysiologic-guided therapy with class IA antiarrhythmic drugs on the long-term outcome of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation with or without the Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999; 10: 1313–1315.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Fontaine G, Piot O, Sohal PS, et al. Sus-decalage du segment ST en derivations precordiales droites et mort subite: relation avec la dysplasie ventriculaire droite arythmogene. [ST segment elevation in right pre-cordial leads and sudden death: relation with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.] Arch Mal Coeur. 1996; 89: 1323–1329.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Haissaguerre M, Shoda M, Jais P, et al. Mapping and ablation of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 962–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Boutitie F, Boissel JP, Connolly SJ, et al. Amiodarone interaction with beta-blockers: analysis of the merged EMIAT and CAMIAT databases. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2268–2275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Turrini P, Corrado D, Basso C, et al. Dispersion of ventricular depolarization-repolarization: a noninvasive marker for risk stratification in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2001; 103: 3075–3080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hebert JL, Chemla D, Gerard O, et al. Angiographic right and left ventricular function in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Am J Cardiol. 2004. In press.
  18. Corrado D, Fontaine G, Marcus FI, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: need for an international registry. Circulation. 2000; 101: e101–e106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. A Multidisciplinary Study of Right Ventricular Dysplasia. Available at: http://www.arvd.org. Accessed February 26, 2004.
  20. Johns Hopkins Medicine. Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia. Available at: http://www.arvd.com. Accessed February 26, 2004.
  21. ARVC/D Clinical Registry Database—Homepage. Available at: http://anpat.unipd.it/ARVC. Accessed February 26, 2004.

Related Article:

Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Therapy in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Single-Center Experience of Long-Term Follow-Up and Complications in 60 Patients
Thomas Wichter, Matthias Paul, Christian Wollmann, Tayfun Acil, Petra Gerdes, Obaidullah Ashraf, Tonny D.T. Tjan, Rasijd Soeparwata, Michael Block, Martin Borggrefe, Hans H. Scheld, Günter Breithardt, and Dirk Böcker
Circulation 2004 109: 1503-1508. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Nava, B. Bauce, C. Basso, W. Dewilde, Y. Vandekerckhove, A. Bol, K. Nasir, C. Bomma, H. Tandri, A. Roguin, et al.
Letters Regarding Article by Nasir et al, "Electrocardiographic Features of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy According to Disease Severity: A Need to Broaden Diagnostic Criteria" * Letters Regarding Article by Nasir et al, "Electrocardiographic Features of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy According to Disease Severity: A Need to Broaden Diagnostic Criteria" * Response
Circulation, July 26, 2005; 112(4): e68 - e69.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. A. Hodgkinson, P. S. Parfrey, A. S. Bassett, C. Kupprion, J. Drenckhahn, M. W. Norman, L. Thierfelder, S. N. Stuckless, E. L. Dicks, W. J. McKenna, et al.
The impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on survival in autosomal-dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVD5)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2005; 45(3): 400 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.-S. Hulot, X. Jouven, J.-P. Empana, R. Frank, and G. Fontaine
Natural History and Risk Stratification of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 1879 - 1884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Long-Term ICD Benefits in High-Risk Patients with Arrhythmogenic RV Dysplasia
Journal Watch Cardiology, May 21, 2004; 2004(521): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prost-Squarcioni, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prost-Squarcioni, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrowRelated Article