Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:1406-1412
Published online before print September 7, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000141728.23033.B5
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/11/1406    most recent
01.CIR.0000141728.23033.B5v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsimikas, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsimikas, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors

(Circulation. 2004;110:1406-1412.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

High-Dose Atorvastatin Reduces Total Plasma Levels of Oxidized Phospholipids and Immune Complexes Present on Apolipoprotein B-100 in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes in the MIRACL Trial

Sotirios Tsimikas, MD; Joseph L. Witztum, MD; Elizabeth R. Miller, BS; William J. Sasiela, PhD; Michael Szarek, SM; Anders G. Olsson, MD PhD; Gregory G. Schwartz, MD PhD, for the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study Investigators

From the Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (S.T., J.L.W., E.R.M.); the Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver (G.G.S.); the Department of Medicine and Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden (A.G.O.); and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Group, New York, NY (W.J.S., M.S.).

Correspondence to Sotirios Tsimikas, MD, Vascular Medicine Program, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, BSB 1080, La Jolla, CA 92093-0682. E-mail stsimikas{at}ucsd.edu

Received April 18, 2004; revision received July 5, 2004; accepted July 8, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) are present within atherosclerotic plaques and bound by lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] in plasma. This study evaluated the impact of atorvastatin on oxidized LDL (OxLDL) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Methods and Results— OxLDL-E06 (OxPL content on apolipoprotein B-100 [apoB] detected by antibody E06), apoB-100 immune complexes (apoB-IC), OxLDL autoantibodies, and Lp(a) levels were measured in 2341 patients at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/d or placebo. The OxLDL-E06 and apoB-IC data are reported per apoB-100 particle (OxPL/apoB, IC/apoB) and as total levels on all apoB-100 particles (total apoB-OxPL and total apoB-IC [eg, OxPL/apoB or IC/apoBxapoB-100 levels]). Compared with baseline values, atorvastatin reduced apoB-100 (–33%), total apoB-OxPL (–29.7%), total apoB-IC IgG (–29.5%), and IgM (–25.7%) (P<0.0001 for all), whereas no change or an increase was observed with placebo. When normalized per apoB-100, compared with placebo, atorvastatin increased OxPL/apoB (9.5% versus –3.9%, P<0.0001) and Lp(a) (8.8% versus –0.7%, (P<0.0001). A strong correlation was noted between OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) (R=0.85, P<0.0001), consistent with previous data that Lp(a) binds OxPL.

Conclusions— After atorvastatin treatment, total OxPL on all apoB-100 particles was decreased. However, there was enrichment of OxPL on a smaller pool of apoB-100 particles, in parallel with similar increases in Lp(a), suggesting binding by Lp(a). These data support the hypothesis that atorvastatin promotes mobilization and clearance of proinflammatory OxPL, which may contribute to a reduction in ischemic events after ACS.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • antibodies • lipoproteins • oxidation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Randomized trials have clearly shown that hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) when given over a period of 5 years.1,2 Retrospective3 and observational4 studies have also suggested that statins given to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) improve event-free survival over a period of 1 year. The MIRACL study demonstrated that in-hospital initiation of 80 mg atorvastatin reduced recurrent ischemic events over a 16-week period.5 The PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE-IT) study recently demonstrated superior outcomes in patients with ACS after 2 years of treatment with 80 mg atorvastatin versus 40 mg pravastatin, resulting in median LDL cholesterol levels of 62 and 95 mg/dL, respectively.6

The mechanisms underlying the early benefits of statins are not well delineated but have been attributed to plaque stabilization.7,8 However, it is not established whether statins exert their benefits primarily through reduction of LDL cholesterol alone and/or through additional pleiotropic effects, such as direct antiinflammatory or antioxidant actions.9 Although statins have been shown to reduce in vitro measures of oxidative stress (reviewed in Norata et al10), their effects on plasma OxLDL levels in patients, particularly those with ACS, are not well known.

Increased levels of OxLDL in the vessel wall and circulation are present in patients with unstable or "vulnerable" plaques,11,12 in ACS,11–14 and associated with endothelial dysfunction.15–17 In mouse and rabbit aortic atherosclerotic lesions, OxLDL becomes depleted after regression diets, out of proportion to LDL depletion or other measures of plaque regression.8,18 These reductions in OxLDL are associated with increased collagen and smooth muscle cell content, increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase production, and reduced inflammatory markers,7 which suggests that removal of OxLDL from the vessel wall may serve as an early marker of plaque stabilization. In this analysis of the MIRACL trial, we determined whether favorable changes in plasma OxLDL levels might provide insights into the early clinical benefits of intensive statin treatment after ACS.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Design and Patient Sample
The MIRACL study design was published previously.5 Briefly, the study recruited 3086 patients with unstable angina or non–Q-wave acute myocardial infarction between 24 and 96 hours after hospital admission at 122 centers in 19 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/d or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the time to first occurrence of death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest with resuscitation, or worsening angina with new objective evidence of ischemia and requiring emergency rehospitalization. In all, 2739 patients completed the entire 16-week follow-up period, of whom 2442 had baseline blood samples and 2341 had baseline and week 16 blood samples available for analysis. Blood was collected in EDTA and stored at –70°C until analysis. Patients were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Determination of OxLDL-E06, Apolipoprotein B-100 Immune Complexes, and OxLDL (MDA-LDL) Autoantibody Titers
Chemiluminescent ELISA was used to measure OxLDL markers (Figure 1). All samples for a given assay were run in a single assay, and internal controls consisting of high and low standard plasma samples were included to detect potential variations between microtitration plates. Each sample was assayed in triplicate, and data are expressed as relative light units (RLU) in 100 ms. The intra-assay coefficients of variation for all assays were 6% to 10%.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic representation of OxLDL assays. A, OxLDL-E06 (OxPL/apoB); B, apoB-immune complexes (IC/apoB); and C, autoantibodies to MDA-LDL. Antibody E06 detects OxPL present on apoB (captured by antibody MB47) and/or apo(a).

OxLDL-E06 is a measure of the content of oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) per apoB-100 particle using the murine monoclonal antibody E06, which specifically binds to the phosphorylcholine head group of oxidized but not native phospholipids (reviewed in Tsimikas13,19 and references given there). A 1:50 dilution of plasma in PBS is added to microtiter wells coated with the monoclonal antibody MB47 (5 µg/mL), which specifically binds apoB-100 particles. Under these conditions, a saturating amount of apoB-100 is added to each well, and consequently, equal numbers of apoB-100 particles are captured in each well for all assays. The content of OxPL per apoB-100 is then determined with biotinylated E06 as described previously.13 In a previous study, we directly measured the amount of apoB-100 bound in each well by the degree of binding of a biotinylated anti–apoB-100 antibody and compared the OxPL RLU values alone with the ratio of OxPL RLU/apoB-100 RLU and found a correlation of r2=0.99 (n=1500 samples, data not shown). Therefore, we arbitrarily assigned the apoB-100 RLU value in the denominator as 1 and report the OxPL/apoB values as OxPL RLU counts only. Note that by design, this assay normalizes the OxPL content per apoB-100 particle and is therefore independent of plasma apoB-100 (and thus LDL cholesterol) levels.

The data for OxLDL-E06 and apoB-IC are presented in 2 ways: (1) as OxPL/apoB and IC/apoB, which specifically quantify the content of OxPL and IC, respectively, on each captured apoB-100 particle, and (2) as total apoB-OxPL and total apoB-IC, which reflect the OxPL and IC content on all apoB-100–containing particles in plasma, by multiplying the plasma "OxPL/apoB" and "IC/apoB" value by the plasma apoB-100 levels measured independently, as noted below.

Plasma titers of IgG and IgM apoB-IC and malondialdehyde (MDA-LDL) (1:200 plasma dilution) autoantibodies and apoB-IC were measured as described previously.13

Lp(a) is a modified LDL particle to which apo(a) is covalently linked. We have recently shown that a strong correlation exists between plasma OxLDL-E06 and Lp(a) levels and that 75% to 90% of the E06 immunoreactivity on apoB-100 particles is associated specifically with Lp(a) at steady state.13,19 E06 immunoreactivity is found in both the lipid and protein moieties of Lp(a), and kringle V of apolipoprotein (a) appears to contain up to 2 mol of covalently bound OxPL.20 However, in some settings, such as immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), OxPLs are found equally on apoB-100 particles without apo(a) and Lp(a).19

Lipoprotein (a) and ApoB-100 Levels
Plasma Lp(a) levels were measured by a chemiluminescent ELISA with monoclonal antibody LPA4, as described previously.19 LPA4 does not cross-react with plasminogen. ApoB-100 levels were measured by a commercially available kit (Behring) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as described previously.5

Statistical Analysis
Because the baseline and week 16 distributions of the OxLDL markers were positively skewed, log-transformed values were used in the statistical models and analyses and antilog-transformed for descriptive statistics, yielding geometric means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for baseline, week 16, and percent change from baseline to week 16. Inferential analyses included paired-sample t tests for within–treatment group differences in markers at baseline versus week 16 and independent-sample t tests for between–treatment group differences in markers at week 16 and between–treatment group differences in absolute change in log-transformed markers from baseline to week 16. Logistic regression models were constructed to summarize the relationships between baseline OxLDL values and the primary efficacy measure of the trial. For each marker, the logistic regression model included terms for log-transformed marker and randomized treatment assignment; odds ratios were expressed as the relative odds for each 1-U increase in the log-transformed marker. Pearson correlations were calculated to summarize the relationship between OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) at baseline and at week 16. Statistical significance was defined at a value of P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Characteristics
Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups (Table 1) or compared with the entire MIRACL population, and there were no significant differences between patients with and without available blood samples for analysis.5 For the 2442 patients with baseline data, 10.7% had an end point in the atorvastatin group and 12.8% in the placebo group during the 16-week follow-up period. Among the entire MIRACL population, 14.6% suffered a primary end-point event in the atorvastatin group, compared with 17.2% in the placebo group. Thus, the incidence of recurrent events was lower in the present analysis cohort than the entire MIRACL population, but the risk reduction associated with atorvastatin treatment was similar.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics of the 2341 Study Subjects

Effect of Atorvastatin on OxLDL Markers and Lp(a)
Baseline levels of apoB-100, total apoB-OxPL, total apoB-IC, MDA-LDL autoantibodies, and Lp(a) did not differ between groups. The atorvastatin-treated group had a 42% reduction in LDL cholesterol (124±34 to 72±35 mg/dL, P<0.0001), whereas the placebo-treated group had modest increases (124±34 to 135±37 mg/dL, P<0.0001). From baseline to week 16, significant reductions in absolute and relative levels of apoB-100, total apoB-OxPL, and total apoB-IC (both IgG and IgM) were noted in the atorvastatin group compared with the placebo group: apoB-100, –33.0% versus 5.8%; total apoB-OxPL, –29.7% versus –0.2%; total apoB-IC IgG, –29.5% versus 2.1%; and total apoB-IC IgM, –25.7% versus 13.2%, P<0.0001 for all comparisons (Table 2 and Figure 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Baseline and 16-Week Mean (95% CI) Levels of ApoB, OxLDL Markers, and Lp(a)



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Geometric mean (95% CI) percent change from baseline to 16 weeks in apoB-100, total apoB-OxPL, and total apoB-IC IgG and IgM in atorvastatin and placebo groups.

In contrast, absolute OxPL/apoB levels increased significantly in the atorvastatin group but actually decreased significantly in the placebo group (Table 2), suggesting that atorvastatin resulted in OxPL enrichment of apoB-100 particles, despite a reduction in total apoB-OxPL levels. In parallel to the rise in OxPL/apoB, Lp(a) levels also increased to a similar extent in response to atorvastatin (Table 2). There was a significant relative increase in OxPL/apoB (9.5% versus –3.9%) and Lp(a) levels (8.8% versus –0.7%, P<0.0001 for both, Figure 3) in the atorvastatin group compared with the placebo group. Indeed, strong correlations were noted between OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) at baseline (r=0.82) and week 16 (r=0.85), P<0.0001 for both, Figure 4. Similar correlations were noted for total apoB-OxPL (data not shown). These findings are consistent with our previous observation that the OxPLs recognized by E06 are predominantly associated with Lp(a).13,19



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Geometric mean (95% CI) percent change from baseline to 16 weeks in OxLDL markers and Lp(a) in atorvastatin and placebo groups.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Correlation between OxLDL-E06 (OxPL/apoB) and Lp(a) in all participants at baseline and 16 weeks.

The relative increases in IgG IC/apoB (9.6% versus –1.8%, P<0.0001) and IgM IC/apoB (15.4% versus 9.3%, P=0.0053) were also higher in the atorvastatin group compared with placebo (Figure 3). The IgG and IgM MDA-LDL autoantibody levels increased equally in both groups (range, 9.1% to 14.4%; P<0.0001 for both; Figure 3), as has been shown previously in ACS.13 The treatment group difference was significant for IgG (P=0.035) but not IgM (P=0.16).

Pearson correlations between log-transformed CRP levels and OxLDL markers and Lp(a) at baseline and week 16 were not statistically significant.

Relationship of Baseline OxLDL Markers and Lp(a) to Clinical Outcomes
With increasing baseline levels of either total apoB-IC IgM or IC/apoB IgM, there was reduced risk (odds ratio, 0.81 for both) of recurrent events (P=0.032 and 0.013, respectively; Figure 5). In this analysis, a 1-U increase on the log scale was slightly greater than the interquartile range (the difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles). Baseline levels of other OxLDL markers, LDL-C, apoB-100, or Lp(a), were not predictive of risk at 16 weeks.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Relationship between continuous baseline OxLDL markers (log-transformed), lipid parameters, and CRP and recurrent events in entire cohort of patients.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study reveals that high-dose atorvastatin significantly reduced the total content of OxPL present on all circulating apoB-100 particles and suggests that the early clinical benefit of atorvastatin in ACS may be mediated in part through a reduction of vasoactive and proinflammatory OxPL in plasma.21 Interestingly, on average, individual apoB-100 particles at the new steady state were actually enriched in OxPL (ie, an increased OxPL/apoB ratio), in conjunction with a strikingly similar increase in Lp(a), which we have previously shown binds OxPL.13,19,20 Although our observations do not establish a causal mechanism, we hypothesize that with the reduction of LDL cholesterol levels and inflammation,22 there ensues a mobilization of OxPL from the vessel wall, transient binding by apoB-100 particles [chiefly Lp(a)], and clearance from the circulation. In addition, these data provide further evidence for a novel physiological and/or pathophysiological role of Lp(a), which we13,19 and others23 have proposed binds and transports inflammatory OxPL.

It should be appreciated that different antibodies are used to detect oxidation epitopes on OxLDL, and, dependent on the epitope measured, different information may be obtained. We have therefore suggested that authors use the antibody used in their assay in their designation of OxLDL to call attention to this possibility at this early stage of such measurements.13 Thus, we designate our measure of OxLDL as OxLDL-E06 (OxPL/apoB). Because our assay was designed to provide a physical estimate of the OxPL epitope detected by E06 already normalized for apoB-100 levels, eg, to yield OxPL/apoB, our methodology allows for 2 complementary but unique sets of measurements. First, it quantifies the number of E06 epitopes per apoB-100 particle (OxPL/apoB), which by design is independent of plasma LDL cholesterol levels.13 Second, when the OxPL/apoB is multiplied by (independently measured) plasma apoB-100 levels, one derives total apoB-OxPL levels present on all apoB-100 particles.

The role of statins in reducing plasma OxLDL in ACS has not been described previously. On the basis of the present study, it can be hypothesized that statin-mediated reduction in total plasma levels of OxPL and apoB-IC may occur through both a reduction in the substrate for oxidation (ie, reducing LDL levels and its associated lipids) and possibly through direct antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin metabolites, which have potent antioxidant effects.24 In vitro studies using several different statins and/or their metabolites demonstrate both a reduction in markers of generalized oxidative stress and LDL susceptibility to oxidation.10 For example, in patients with hypercholesterolemia, simvastatin has been shown to reduce the formation of F2-isoprostanes and plasma OxLDL levels, although the epitope of OxLDL measured in this study was not defined.25 Moreover, statins also have other reported pleiotropic effects, at least in animal models, such as nitric oxide–sparing properties.9

OxPLs are known to be highly inflammatory and to induce vasoconstriction,21 and it is possible that removal of such OxPLs contributes to rapid improvement in endothelial function. This is supported by several studies showing improvement in coronary17 and brachial endothelial function16 with LDL apheresis or lovastatin treatment.15 More specifically, Tamai et al16 have shown that acetylcholine-induced brachial artery vasodilatation improves rapidly within 4 hours after LDL apheresis [Lp(a) is also removed], and the best correlate of improvement was reduced plasma OxLDL levels, measured by use of monoclonal antibody DLH3, which binds to an OxPL epitope nearly identical to that bound by E06. Penny et al15 have shown that OxLDL-E06 was the best correlate of acetylcholine-induced coronary vasodilatation after lovastatin therapy in patients with CAD. LDL apheresis also decreases plasma concentrations of another model OxLDL, MDA-LDL, by 61%.26 A reduction in total OxPL may also produce antiinflammatory effects, which, in turn, may be related to clinical benefit of statin treatment.22 However, in this and previous studies,13 we have not found an association between any plasma OxLDL markers and CRP.

Our analyses also reveal the complementary observation that the plasma apoB particles of atorvastatin-treated patients were enriched in OxPL (an absolute 13.4% difference compared with placebo), even though there was an overall reduction in the content of total OxPL on all apoB-100 particles. What are the potential mechanisms of the increase in OxPL/apoB plasma levels after treatment with atorvastatin? In human studies, Crisby et al27 have shown that 3 months of treatment with pravastatin before carotid endarterectomy markedly reduced OxLDL immunostaining in carotid plaques, using the oxidation-specific antibody NA59, which recognizes 4-hydroxynonenal oxidation-specific epitopes. Tsimikas et al18 in an LDLR–/– mouse model and Aikawa et al8 in a New Zealand White rabbit model, both using the oxidation-specific antibody MDA2, have shown decreased OxLDL content in aortic plaques after aggressive dietary lipid lowering. Additional unpublished data from both these murine and rabbit experiments, which do not have Lp(a), as well as similar studies with cynomolgus monkeys, which do have Lp(a), show that after regression of established atherosclerosis by diet-induced lipid lowering, there are similar increases in OxPL/apoB plasma levels but markedly diminished total apoB-OxPL levels, similar to the MIRACL study. In all 3 animal studies, a direct immunochemical analysis of the arterial tissue with antibody E06 demonstrated a marked depletion of OxPL epitopes from the vessel wall, even as the plasma OxPL/apoB ratios were increased from the baseline measurements. Thus, in association with lesion regression, there was a clear net efflux of OxPL from the vessel wall at a time when the OxPL/apoB ratio in plasma was increased (Tsimikas and Witztum, unpublished observations). In addition, unpublished in vitro data in our laboratory show that even in a PBS buffer, there is preferential physical transfer of OxPL (derived from OxLDL) to Lp(a) compared with LDL. These data strongly support the hypothesis that the increase in OxPL/apoB associated with atorvastatin treatment is a surrogate marker of net OxPL efflux from the vessel wall. This hypothesis deserves further study.

Lp(a) levels were also modestly increased in response to atorvastatin in this study, which has previously been observed during the treatment of hypercholesterolemia with other statins28–32 but has been underappreciated. One might speculate that increased Lp(a) levels occur in response to the enhanced efflux of OxPL from the vessel wall to facilitate their transport and elimination, although the mechanisms mediating such processes are unknown. In addition, it is also possible that antiinflammatory and antiatherogenic functions of HDL may have been improved by atorvastatin, leading to increased OxPL efflux.33 HDL, and in particular, a pre-ß fraction of HDL, may be the preferred initial acceptor of cholesterol from cellular sources. Recently, Navab et al34 have observed that an apoA-I mimetic compound effects efflux of OxPL from cells to such a pre-ß HDL fraction, and we speculate that in turn, Lp(a) would then preferentially accept such OxPL from the pre-ß HDL. This potential mechanism of efflux of OxPL from the vessel wall may be analogous to the rapid effects of apoA-1/phospholipid complexes in reducing coronary atheroma volume, which presumptively also mobilized lipids out of the vessel wall.35 In support of this hypothesis is the recent observation that the OxPL/apoB ratio increased, as did Lp(a), in subjects consuming a low-fat diet, another condition in which one might speculate that there was mobilization of OxPL from the artery wall.36

In support of a potential transport function of OxPL by Lp(a), we have recently documented an {approx}50% increase in plasma OxLDL-E06 (ie, OxPL/apoB) levels immediately after PCI, presumably released from disrupted plaques, with a simultaneous and similar increase in Lp(a) levels.19 Furthermore, the released OxPL epitopes were initially equally present on both apoB-100 and Lp(a) particles but appeared to transfer to Lp(a) nearly exclusively by 6 hours.19 In patients presenting with ACS or undergoing PCI,13,19 we have also shown a strong association between plasma levels of OxLDL-E06 (OxPL/apoB) and Lp(a), further defining a novel pathophysiological association between OxPL and Lp(a).

It is also possible that Lp(a) contributes directly to the degradation of such OxPL, because Lp(a) was reported to be greatly enriched in platelet-activating factor acetyl hydrolase, an enzyme that can degrade such OxPL.21,37 We have previously suggested that this potential physiological function of Lp(a) may be beneficial acutely, particularly in patients with normal Lp(a) levels. However, in patients with chronically elevated levels, Lp(a), with its predilection for enhanced binding to the extracellular matrix of atherosclerotic lesions (reviewed in Tsimikas et al13), may be proinflammatory and proatherogenic because of the enhanced OxPL content.

The highest baseline levels of IgM IC/apoB and total apoB-IC were associated with reduced risk of recurrent events (OR, 0.81 and 0.84, respectively), and there was a similar trend with IgM MDA-LDL autoantibodies (OR, 0.90). Although the underlying mechanisms are unclear, this suggests a potential protective effect of IgM OxLDL autoantibodies, as has been shown in animal models immunized with OxLDL or pneumococcal vaccine (which contains the same OxPL epitopes as OxLDL), which induce high circulating levels of OxLDL-specific IgM autoantibodies and decreased atherosclerosis.38 This is also consistent with previous studies showing an inverse correlation between IgM OxLDL autoantibody titers and CAD,13 hypertension,39 and carotid and femoral atherosclerosis.40,41

Limitations of the present study include the absence of blood samples at an intermediate time point during randomized treatment. Had samples been available for such measurements, the change in OxPL markers from baseline to the intermediate time point could have been related to the risk of an event after the intermediate time point. The high correlation of OxLDL-EO6 with Lp(a) raises the question of whether measurements of OxLDL-E06 will provide incremental information above and beyond measurement of Lp(a). Additional experimental and appropriately powered clinical studies will be needed to establish whether OxPL markers are useful in predicting clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, our data do suggest novel physiological and/or pathophysiological functions of Lp(a) that warrant further investigation in future studies.

In conclusion, this study shows that atorvastatin therapy, compared with placebo, results in marked reduction in total plasma OxPL associated with apoB-100, while at the same time enlarging a pool of Lp(a) particles enriched in OxPL. These observations support the hypothesis that early atorvastatin treatment after ACS enhances mobilization and subsequent clearance of OxPL from the arterial wall, a mechanism that may contribute to the clinical benefit of statin therapy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This investigation was supported by NHLBI grant HL-56989 (La Jolla Specialized Center of Research in Molecular Medicine and Atherosclerosis; Drs Tsimikas, Miller, and Witztum), an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer, Inc (Dr Tsimikas), and a grant from the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994; 344: 1383–1389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360: 7–22.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Aronow HD, Topol EJ, Roe MT, et al. Effect of lipid-lowering therapy on early mortality after acute coronary syndromes: an observational study. Lancet. 2001; 357: 1063–1068.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Stenestrand U, Wallentin L. Early statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction and 1-year survival. JAMA. 2001; 285: 430–436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1711–1718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Comparison of intensive and moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1495–1504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Aikawa M, Rabkin E, Okada Y, et al. Lipid lowering by diet reduces matrix metalloproteinase activity and increases collagen content of rabbit atheroma: a potential mechanism of lesion stabilization. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2433–2444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Aikawa M, Sugiyama S, Hill CC, et al. Lipid lowering reduces oxidative stress and endothelial cell activation in rabbit atheroma. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1390–1396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Takemoto M, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1712–1719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Norata GD, Pirillo A, Catapano AL. Statins and oxidative stress during atherogenesis. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2003; 10: 181–189.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ehara S, Ueda M, Naruko T, et al. Elevated levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1955–1960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Nishi K, Itabe H, Uno M, et al. Oxidized LDL in carotid plaques and plasma associates with plaque instability. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1649–1654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tsimikas S, Bergmark C, Beyer RW, et al. Temporal increases in plasma markers of oxidized low-density lipoprotein strongly reflect the presence of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 360–370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Holvoet P, Collen D, van de Werf F. Malondialdehyde-modified LDL as a marker of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 1999; 281: 1718–1721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Penny WF, Ben Yehuda O, Kuroe K, et al. Improvement of coronary artery endothelial dysfunction with lipid-lowering therapy: heterogeneity of segmental response and correlation with plasma-oxidized low density lipoprotein. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 766–774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Tamai O, Matsuoka H, Itabe H, et al. Single LDL apheresis improves endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in hypercholesterolemic humans. Circulation. 1997; 95: 76–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Mellwig KP, Baller D, Gleichmann U, et al. Improvement of coronary vasodilatation capacity through single LDL apheresis. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 139: 173–178.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Tsimikas S, Shortal BP, Witztum JL, et al. In vivo uptake of radiolabeled MDA2, an oxidation-specific monoclonal antibody, provides an accurate measure of atherosclerotic lesions rich in oxidized LDL and is highly sensitive to their regression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 689–697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tsimikas S, Lau HK, Han KR, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention results in acute increases in oxidized phospholipids and Lp(a): acute and long-term immunological responses to oxidized LDL. Circulation. 2004; 109: 3164–3170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Edelstein C, Pfaffinger D, Hinman J, et al. Lysine-phosphatidylcholine adducts in kringle V impart unique immunological and potential pro-inflammatory properties to human apolipoprotein(a). J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 51841–51847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Berliner JA, Subbanagounder G, Leitinger N, et al. Evidence for a role of phospholipid oxidation products in atherogenesis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2001; 11: 142–147.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Kinlay S, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, et al. High-dose atorvastatin enhances the decline in inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the MIRACL study. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1560–1566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hobbs HH, White AL. Lipoprotein(a): intrigues and insights. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999; 10: 225–236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Bisgaier CL, et al. Atorvastatin and gemfibrozil metabolites, but not the parent drugs, are potent antioxidants against lipoprotein oxidation. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 138: 271–280.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. De Caterina R, Cipollone F, Filardo FP, et al. Low-density lipoprotein level reduction by the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A inhibitor simvastatin is accompanied by a related reduction of F2-isoprostane formation in hypercholesterolemic subjects: no further effect of vitamin E. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2543–2549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kobayashi J, Katsube S, Shimoda M, et al. Single LDL apheresis improves serum remnant-like particle-cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and malondialdehyde-modified-low-density lipoprotein concentrations in Japanese hypercholesterolemic subjects. Clin Chim Acta. 2002; 321: 107–112.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, et al. Pravastatin treatment increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inflammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation. 2001; 103: 926–933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. McKenney JM, McCormick LS, Weiss S, et al. A randomized trial of the effects of atorvastatin and niacin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia or isolated hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Med. 1998; 104: 137–143.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schaefer EJ, McNamara JR, Tayler T, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on fasting and postprandial lipoprotein subclasses in coronary heart disease patients versus control subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 689–696.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Dart A, Jerums G, Nicholson G, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 39–44.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Bredie SJ, Westerveld HT, Knipscheer HC, et al. Effects of gemfibrozil or simvastatin on apolipoprotein-B–containing lipoproteins, apolipoprotein-CIII and lipoprotein(a) in familial combined hyperlipidaemia. Neth J Med. 1996; 49: 59–67.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Slunga L, Johnson O, Dahlen GH. Changes in Lp(a) lipoprotein levels during the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia with simvastatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992; 43: 369–373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Navab M, Ananthramaiah GM, Reddy ST, et al. Thematic review series. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: the oxidation hypothesis of atherogenesis: the role of oxidized phospholipids and HDL. J Lipid Res. 2004; 45: 993–1007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Navab M, Anantharamaiah GM, Reddy ST, et al. Oral D-4F causes formation of pre-ß high-density lipoprotein and improves high-density lipoprotein–mediated cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport from macrophages in apolipoprotein E–null mice. Circulation. 2004; 109: 3215–3220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Nissen SE, Tsunoda T, Tuzcu EM, et al. Effect of recombinant apoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2292–2300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Silaste ML, Rantala M, Alfthan G, et al. Changes in dietary fat intake alter plasma levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 498–503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kostner KM, Kostner GM. Lipoprotein(a): still an enigma? Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002; 13: 391–396.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Binder CJ, Horkko S, Dewan A, et al. Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 736–743.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Wu R, de Faire U, Lemne C, et al. Autoantibodies to OxLDL are decreased in individuals with borderline hypertension. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 53–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hulthe J, Bokemark L, Fagerberg B. Antibodies to oxidized LDL in relation to intima-media thickness in carotid and femoral arteries in 58-year-old subjectively clinically healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 101–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Karvonen J, Paivansalo M, Kesaniemi YA, et al. Immunoglobulin M type of autoantibodies to oxidized low-density lipoprotein has an inverse relation to carotid artery atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2107–2112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Merki, M. J. Graham, A. E. Mullick, E. R. Miller, R. M. Crooke, R. E. Pitas, J. L. Witztum, and S. Tsimikas
Antisense Oligonucleotide Directed to Human Apolipoprotein B-100 Reduces Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Oxidized Phospholipids on Human Apolipoprotein B-100 Particles in Lipoprotein(a) Transgenic Mice
Circulation, August 12, 2008; 118(7): 743 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. H. Choi, A. Chae, E. Miller, M. Messig, F. Ntanios, A. N. DeMaria, S. E. Nissen, J. L. Witztum, and S. Tsimikas
Relationship Between Biomarkers of Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein, Statin Therapy, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, and Atheroma Volume Observations From the REVERSAL (Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering) Study.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 24 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. Divchev, C. Grothusen, M. Luchtefeld, M. Thoenes, F. Onono, R. Koch, H. Drexler, and B. Schieffer
Impact of a combined treatment of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade and 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA-reductase inhibition on secretory phospholipase A2-type IIA and low density lipoprotein oxidation in patients with coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., June 18, 2008; (2008) ehn276v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Ky, A. Burke, S. Tsimikas, M. L. Wolfe, M. G. Tadesse, P. O. Szapary, J. L. Witztum, G. A. FitzGerald, and D. J. Rader
The Influence of Pravastatin and Atorvastatin on Markers of Oxidative Stress in Hypercholesterolemic Humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1653 - 1662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Grau, M. Guxens, I. Subirana, M. Fito, M.-I. Covas, B. Jacquemin, J. Sunyer, T. Lanki, S. Picciotto, T. Bellander, et al.
South-to-North gradient in lipid peroxidation in men with stable coronary artery disease in Europe
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2841 - 2849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Tsimikas, L. D. Tsironis, and A. D. Tselepis
New Insights Into the Role of Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 in Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2007; 27(10): 2094 - 2099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Kiechl, J. Willeit, M. Mayr, B. Viehweider, M. Oberhollenzer, F. Kronenberg, C. J. Wiedermann, S. Oberthaler, Q. Xu, J. L. Witztum, et al.
Oxidized Phospholipids, Lipoprotein(a), Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity, and 10-Year Cardiovascular Outcomes: Prospective Results From the Bruneck Study
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1788 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Tsimikas, E. S. Brilakis, R. J. Lennon, E. R. Miller, J. L. Witztum, J. P. McConnell, K. S. Kornman, and P. B. Berger
Relationship of IgG and IgM autoantibodies to oxidized low density lipoprotein with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 425 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Tsimikas, M. Aikawa, F. J. Miller Jr, E. R. Miller, M. Torzewski, S. R. Lentz, C. Bergmark, D. D. Heistad, P. Libby, and J. L. Witztum
Increased Plasma Oxidized Phospholipid:Apolipoprotein B-100 Ratio With Concomitant Depletion of Oxidized Phospholipids From Atherosclerotic Lesions After Dietary Lipid-Lowering: A Potential Biomarker of Early Atherosclerosis Regression
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 175 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Wu, W. C. Willett, N. Rifai, I. Shai, J. E. Manson, and E. B. Rimm
Is Plasma Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein, Measured With the Widely Used Antibody 4E6, an Independent Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease Among U.S. Men and Women?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 973 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Mayr, S. Kiechl, S. Tsimikas, E. Miller, J. Sheldon, J. Willeit, J. L. Witztum, and Q. Xu
Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Autoantibodies, Chronic Infections, and Carotid Atherosclerosis in a Population-Based Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2436 - 2443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Tsimikas, S. Kiechl, J. Willeit, M. Mayr, E. R. Miller, F. Kronenberg, Q. Xu, C. Bergmark, S. Weger, F. Oberhollenzer, et al.
Oxidized Phospholipids Predict the Presence and Progression of Carotid and Femoral Atherosclerosis and Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease: Five-Year Prospective Results From the Bruneck Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2219 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Rodenburg, M. N. Vissers, A. Wiegman, E. R. Miller, P. M. Ridker, J. L. Witztum, J. J.P. Kastelein, and S. Tsimikas
Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein in Children With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Unaffected Siblings: Effect of Pravastatin
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1803 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Tsimikas, J. T. Willerson, and P. M. Ridker
C-reactive protein and other emerging blood biomarkers to optimize risk stratification of vulnerable patients.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C19 - C31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. P. Mason, M. F. Walter, C. A. Day, and R. F. Jacob
Active Metabolite of Atorvastatin Inhibits Membrane Cholesterol Domain Formation by an Antioxidant Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9337 - 9345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. J. Armstrong, D. A. Morrow, and M. S. Sabatine
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Part III: Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Angiogenic Growth Factors
Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): e289 - e292.
[Full Text] [PDF]