Published online before print June 28, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134961.36773.D6
(Circulation. 2004;110:1473-1476.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
Acute Improvement in Global and Regional Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Percutaneous Heart Valve Implantation in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
From the Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.
Correspondence to Fabrice Bauer, MD, Cardiology Department, Echocardiography Core Lab, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France. E-mail fabrice.bauer{at}chu-rouen.fr
Received March 22, 2004; revision received May 24, 2004; accepted May 25, 2004.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— The newly developed percutaneous heart valve (PHV) implantation technique decreases transaortic pressure gradient in patients with aortic stenosis. PHV replacement effects on left ventricular (LV) global and regional systolic function are currently unknown.
Methods and Results— Eight patients with severe aortic stenosis had 2D echocardiography at baseline and 24 hours after PHV implantation to evaluate changes in LV volume and LV ejection fraction. Regional function, ie, both peak systolic anterior and posterior wall tissue velocity, as well as strain and strain rate imaging, were measured by tissue Doppler imaging from a short-axis view. At 24 hours, a significant reduction in transaortic mean pressure gradient (from 46±15 to 8±3 mm Hg; P<0.0001) was accompanied by an increase in aortic valve area (from 0.59±0.11 to 1.69±0.11 cm2; P<0.0001). LV end-diastolic volume remained unchanged (102±36 to 101±12 mL; P=NS), whereas LV ejection fraction increased (48±18% to 57±12%; P<0.01). Improvement in posterior wall displacement (posterior wall tissue velocity increased from 2.2±0.5 to 4.4±1.0 cm/s–1; P=0.0003) and deformation (strain rate imaging increased from 1.0±0.3 to 1.9±0.7 s–1, P=0.009, and strain increased from 11±5% to 17±9%; P=0.02) were observed.
Conclusions— Immediately after PHV replacement, improvement of LV global and regional systolic function was evidenced by tissue Doppler imaging.
Key Words: systole • aorta • stenosis • echocardiography • valves
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), subclinical systolic abnormalities are underestimated and may contribute to symptoms despite normal ejection fraction. Abnormal left ventricular (LV) systolic function starts at early stage of the disease, with reduction of regional deformation1 secondary to extensive remodeling of the extracellular matrix2 leading to hypertrophy and ultimately to depressed LV ejection fraction. This is related to the critical afterload imposed by the aortic valve stenosis. Tissue Doppler imaging is one of the most appropriate ultrasound technologies capable of detecting any clinical and subclinical regional LV dysfunction in numerous diseases using displacement and deformation indices.1,3
By reducing transaortic pressure gradient, percutaneous heart valve (PHV) implantation successfully cures LV elevated afterload in patients with AS.4 However, its effects on LV systolic function are unknown. We therefore applied tissue Doppler imaging to detect subtle improvement in global and regional LV systolic function immediately after PHV implantation.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The protocol was approved by a local, national, and international board. All patients gave written informed consent before participation. Subjects had an aortic valve area <0.7 cm2.
Eight consecutive AS patients who were symptomatic despite maximal medical therapy underwent PHV implantation after being declined by 2 independent surgeons due to hemodynamic instability and associated severe comorbidities. Twenty-four hours before PHV implantation, transthoracic 2D and Doppler echocardiography was performed. The day of aortic valve implantation, aortic catheterization was carried out simultaneously with LV catheterization. On the pressure tracings, aortic systolic pressure, aortic diastolic pressure, peak systolic LV pressure, and LV end-diastolic pressure were measured. Peak-to-peak and mean systolic transaortic pressure were determined. Nonsurgical aortic valve replacement procedure has been described elsewhere.5,6 In 6 cases, the anterograde transseptal approach was used, whereas in 2 cases, the retrograde arterial method was used. Briefly, a stiff 0.035-inch guide wire was engaged through the native aortic valve, and then the PHV was advanced over the wire within the stenotic native valve. After optimal positioning, the prosthetic heart valve was delivered by maximal balloon inflation, 23 mm in diameter, under fast cardiac pacing (220 bpm) to decrease the blood flow and help stabilize the balloon/PHV assembly during inflation. Hemodynamic parameters and transthoracic echocardiography were reiterated immediately after PHV implantation. Transthoracic echocardiography was repeated 24 hours after the procedure.
Echocardiographic Studies
Parasternal and apical views were obtained by use of a VingMed ultrasound system. For echocardiographic acquisition, parameters were averaged during 3 to 5 cardiac cycles. LV outflow tract pulsed-Doppler spectrum as well as transaortic Doppler spectrum in the 5-chamber view were acquired for velocity recording. Posterior and anterior wall velocities (3 cycles) were recorded with 2D color tissue Doppler imaging at a frame rate averaging 110 frames per second.
Echocardiographic Analysis
A single observer performed the analysis online for conventional echocardiographic parameters and offline for tissue Doppler measurements using a workstation (EchoPac software). Measurements included LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and LV ejection fraction. LV outflow tract cross-sectional area (CSA) was determined from the parasternal long-axis view. Aortic valve was analyzed for velocity time integral (TVIAo), mean pressure gradient, and peak pressure gradient derived from the modified Bernoulli equation: peak pressure gradient=4v2, where v (m/s) is transaortic peak velocity. LV outflow tract was interrogated for velocity time integral (TVIlvot). Aortic valve area by echocardiography (AVA) was calculated from the continuity equation: AVA=(CSAxTVIlvot)/TVIAo.7
For tissue Doppler velocity measurement, sample volumes were placed at the posterior and the anterior wall from the parasternal short-axis views. Strain rate imaging and strain were determined as described previously.3 An offset of 10.8 mm was used for both strain studies. Tissue velocity, strain rate imaging, and strain curves were calculated from exactly the same sample volume. We therefore measured peak systolic tissue velocity, peak systolic strain rate imaging (SRIps), and peak systolic strain (Sps) (Figure 1).
|
Statistics
Preimplantation and postimplantation data were compared by paired t test. Significance was set at P<0.05.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Mean age was 82.6±3.3 years (range, 77 to 88 years; 6 women). All patients were in NYHA class IV, with 2 patients in cardiogenic shock. By echocardiography, all patients had severe AS, with AVA averaging 0.59±0.11 cm2. Peak pressure gradient and mean pressure gradient were 78±19 and 46±15 mm Hg, respectively. LV ejection fraction averaged 48±18% (range, 22% to 73%), and LV ejection fraction was lower than 45% in 3 patients. Nonsurgical aortic valve replacement was successfully achieved in all patients.
Changes in Hemodynamics and Aortic Valve Properties After PHV Implantation
All data are summarized in the Table. There were no changes in aortic systolic and diastolic pressures or in heart rate, whereas LV systolic and LV end-diastolic pressures significantly decreased after PHV implantation. Immediately after the procedure, transaortic peak pressure gradient by echocardiography was significantly reduced (20±7 mm Hg; P<0.01), as was mean pressure gradient (8±3 mm Hg; P<0.0001) with concomitant increase in AVA (1.69±0.11 cm2, P<0.0001).
|
Changes in Global and Regional Systolic Function
LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were unchanged, but LV ejection fraction increased from 48±18% to 57±12% (P<0.01) at follow-up (Table). Improvement in LV ejection fraction was obvious in patients with low ejection fraction.
Peak systolic tissue velocity was significantly improved at LV posterior wall, whereas it was relatively unchanged at LV anterior wall (2.2±0.5 before versus 4.4±1.0 cm/s–1 after procedure, P=0.0003, and 2.1±1.1 before versus 2.8±1.5 cm/s–1 after procedure, P=0.29, respectively; Figures 1A and 2
A).
|
SRIps was significantly enhanced in all patients both at LV posterior and anterior wall (1.0±0.3 before versus 1.9±0.7 s–1 after procedure, P=0.009; 0.8±0.5 before versus 1.5±0.3 s–1 after procedure, P=0.002, respectively; Figures 1B and 2
B). Similarly, improvement of Sps was evidenced in all patient but 1 at both LV posterior and anterior wall (11±5% before versus 17±9% after procedure, P=0.02; 11±9% before versus 18±7% after procedure, P=0.02, respectively; Figures 1C and 2C).
Five patients were alive at 1-month follow-up. By ANOVA, they had persistent improvement in SRIps and Sps at LV posterior wall (1.7±0.5 s–1 and 17±3%, P<0.05, respectively) and anterior wall (1.6±0.3 s–1 and 19±5%, P<0.05, respectively).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Systolic Function in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
In the evolving course of AS, patients frequently have global LV dysfunction, evidenced by echocardiographic low ejection fraction. Recently, subclinical LV systolic dysfunction by tissue Doppler imaging was found in patients with AS despite good ejection fraction. Displacement and deformation of some LV regional portions were significantly decreased compared with baseline.1 The progressive accumulation of interstitial collagen fibers in hypertrophied left ventricle, in parallel to an increase in heart weight, contributes to a spectrum of regional ventricular dysfunction involving either the diastolic or systolic phase of the cardiac cycle. This phenomenon precedes the global LV dysfunction.
Conventional echocardiography is appropriate to detect global LV dysfunction but not subclinical systolic abnormalities. Sensitivity of tissue Doppler imaging is superior and is now being used to evidence regional systolic dysfunction at early stages of pressure-overloaded left ventricle before ejection fraction deteriorates. Patients with essential hypertension and normal ejection fraction have reduced LV longitudinal function.8 In patients with AS, the degree of abnormality in regional deformation correlates with aortic valve area.1
Reversibility of Systolic Dysfunction After PHV Implantation
Surgical aortic valve replacement favorably modifies LV remodeling by immediate fall in afterload at early stage and later on corrects the neurohormonal imbalance.9 Improvement in LV ejection fraction is apparent in patients with low LV ejection fraction before surgery exhibiting a contractile reserve under dobutamine test10 but less remarkable in patients with normal ejection fraction based on conventional 2D echocardiography study. Tissue Doppler imaging is preferable to analyze subtle changes in systolic function at a time when ejection fraction remains normal. In pressure-overloaded rats with normal usual indices of systolic function, Derumeaux et al11 demonstrated early abnormal regional LV systolic function, ie, deformation. Recovery in regional deformation was apparent at early but not late debanding. Such findings have never been reported in humans.
Percutaneous valve replacement is a new promising technique introduced as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in a subset of nonsurgical patients with AS.4 We demonstrated in the present study significant improvement in global and regional LV function as soon as PHV implantation, even in patients with low ejection fraction. This improvement 24 hours after the procedure suggests the main influence of afterload on regional systolic function. Although our population was not compared with age-matched controls, strain rate imaging and strain did not normalized after valve implantation.1 Improvement in regional deformation is limited by the collagen content that correlates directly to the severity and the duration of the disease, which makes the regional systolic function partially reversible at short-term follow-up.
In conclusion, percutaneous aortic valve replacement is characterized by an immediate enhancement of global and regional systolic function, even in patients with low ejection fraction. In a attempt to confirm our findings, global and regional systolic function should be explored over time and correlated to functional class and quality of life.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Kowalski M, Herbots L, Weidemann F, et al. One-dimensional ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging: a new approach to the quantitation of regional myocardial function in patients with aortic stenosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003; 29: 1085–1092.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Kaden JJ, Dempfle CE, Grobholz R, et al. Interleukin-1ß promotes matrix metalloproteinase expression and cell proliferation in calcific aortic valve stenosis. Atherosclerosis. 2003; 170: 205–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Koyama J, Ray-Sequin PA, Falk RH. Longitudinal myocardial function assessed by tissue velocity, strain, and strain rate tissue Doppler echocardiography in patients with AL (primary) cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2446–2452.
4. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 698–703.
5. Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, Cribier A. Percutaneous implantation of aortic valve prosthesis in patients with calcific aortic stenosis: technical aspects. J Interv Cardiol. 2003; 16: 515–521.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002; 106: 3006–3008.
7. Teirstein P, Yeager M, Yock PG, et al. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive application of the Gorlin formula. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 8: 1059–1065.[Abstract]
8. Poulsen SH, Andersen NH, Ivarsen PI, et al. Doppler tissue imaging reveals systolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension and apparent "isolated" diastolic dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 724–731.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Walther T, Schubert A, Falk V, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical therapy for aortic stenosis: correlation to renin-angiotensin system gene expression. Circulation. 2002 (suppl I); 106: I23–I26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Nishimura RA, Grantham JA, Connolly HM, et al. Low-output, low-gradient aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function: the clinical utility of the dobutamine challenge in the catheterization laboratory. Circulation. 2002; 106: 809–813.
11. Derumeaux G, Mulder P, Richard V, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging differentiates physiological from pathological pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy in rats. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1602–1608.
Related Article:
Circulation 2004 110: 1337.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  E. Donal, C. Bergerot, H. Thibault, L. Ernande, J. Loufoua, L. Augeul, M. Ovize, and G. Derumeaux Influence of afterload on left ventricular radial and longitudinal systolic functions: a two-dimensional strain imaging study Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2009; 10(8): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. A. Dwyer, P. B. Matthews, A. Azadani, L. Ge, T. S. Guy, and E. E. Tseng Migration forces of transcatheter aortic valves in patients with noncalcific aortic insufficiency J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2009; 138(5): 1227 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. A. Dwyer, P. B. Matthews, A. Azadani, N. Jaussaud, L. Ge, T. S. Guy, and E. E. Tseng Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 301 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Lafitte, M. Perlant, P. Reant, K. Serri, H. Douard, A. DeMaria, and R. Roudaut Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2009; 10(3): 414 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F Bauer, F Mghaieth, N Dervaux, E Donal, G Derumeaux, A Cribier, and J-P Bessou Preoperative tissue Doppler imaging differentiates beneficial from detrimental left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with surgical aortic stenosis. A postoperative morbidity study Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1440 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. T.L. Chiam and C. E. Ruiz Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing Results, Judging Outcomes, and Planning Trials: The Interventionalist Perspective J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2008; 1(4): 341 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Webb Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement Will Become a Common Treatment for Aortic Valve Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 122 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Walther, P. Simon, T. Dewey, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, V. Falk, M. T. Kasimir, M. Doss, M. A. Borger, G. Schuler, D. Glogar, et al. Transapical Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation: Multicenter Experience Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-240 - I-245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Coats and P. Bonhoeffer NEW PERCUTANEOUS TREATMENTS FOR VALVE DISEASE Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 639 - 644. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Walther, V. Falk, M. A. Borger, T. Dewey, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, G. Schuler, M. Mack, and F. W. Mohr Minimally invasive transapical beating heart aortic valve implantation -- proof of concept Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Grube, J. C. Laborde, U. Gerckens, T. Felderhoff, B. Sauren, L. Buellesfeld, R. Mueller, M. Menichelli, T. Schmidt, B. Zickmann, et al. Percutaneous Implantation of the CoreValve Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Valve Disease: The Siegburg First-in-Man Study Circulation, October 10, 2006; 114(15): 1616 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. M. Dewey, T. Walther, M. Doss, D. Brown, W. H. Ryan, L. Svensson, T. Mihaljevic, R. Hambrecht, G. Schuler, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation: an animal feasibility study. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 110 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Walther, T. Dewey, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, M. Doss, R. Hambrecht, G. Schuler, F. W. Mohr, and M. Mack Transapical approach for sutureless stent-fixed aortic valve implantation: experimental results. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 703 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. H. Marwick Measurement of Strain and Strain Rate by Echocardiography: Ready for Prime Time? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1313 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Cribier, H. Eltchaninoff, C. Tron, F. Bauer, C. Agatiello, D. Nercolini, S. Tapiero, P.-Y. Litzler, J.-P. Bessou, and V. Babaliaros Treatment of Calcific Aortic Stenosis With the Percutaneous Heart Valve: Mid-Term Follow-Up From the Initial Feasibility Studies: The French Experience J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 21, 2006; 47(6): 1214 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||