| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;110:2077-2082.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology |
From the Centre for Clinical Pharmacology (M.W.B., R.J.M.), University College London, London, United Kingdom; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K.K.), Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and Critical Care Group (M.W.B., M.J.P.), Portex Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to M.W. Broadhead, Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, BHF Laboratories, The Rayne Building, 5 University St, London WC1E 6JJ, England. E-mail M.Broadhead{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk
Received January 15, 2004; de novo received May 20, 2004; accepted June 22, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results IRI of the forearm was induced by inflating a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg for 20 minutes in healthy volunteers. KATP activation was modulated by intra-arterial glibenclamide (blocker) and diazoxide (opener). Endothelial function (response to intra-arterial acetylcholine) was assessed with forearm plethysmography before and after (1) 15-minute reperfusion, (2) IRI preceded by IPC (3 five-minute periods of ischemia), (3) IRI preceded by IPC with glibenclamide, (4) IPC followed by glibenclamide before IRI, (5) IRI preceded by diazoxide, and (6) IRI preceded by coinfusion of glibenclamide with diazoxide. IRI caused endothelial dysfunction (P=0.002), which IPC prevented (P=0.40). Glibenclamide abolished IPC when given contemporaneously with (P=0.003) or during IRI (P=0.0005). Diazoxide prevented endothelial dysfunction after IRI (P=0.68) but not when coinfused with glibenclamide.
Conclusion Glibenclamide abolishes and diazoxide mimics endothelial IPC in humans. The time course of the effect of glibenclamide suggests involvement of KATP channels as effectors of endothelial IPC in vivo. These data may have implications for understanding the therapeutic role of agents that modulate KATP channel function.
Key Words: ischemia reperfusion potassium channels ischemic preconditioning
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism of IPC is complex, involving a variety of "triggers" believed to be released in tissues during ischemia, including adenosine,6 bradykinin,8 endogenous opiates,9 and reactive oxygen species.10 These triggers activate multiple signaling pathways that appear to converge on the mitochondria, with evidence for activation of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channels (KATP) as a key step in the effector mechanism of IPC. Although mitochondrial KATP channels have yet to be identified at the molecular level, KATP openers (including diazoxide) mimic IPC,1113 and KATP blockers (including glibenclamide) inhibit IPC in animal models.4,11,14 How opening of mitochondrial KATP channels causes IPC is unclear, but depolarizing of mitochondria with reduction in intramitochondrial calcium,15 reduced mitochondrial swelling,16 and activation of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore,17 has been suggested. The situation is further complicated by recent animal data that suggest that opening of KATP channels is involved in the triggering of preconditioning via release of reactive oxygen species from the mitochondria.13
In humans, IPC has been demonstrated to protect human cardiomyocytes from ischemic damage in vitro.1820 Although KATP channel blockers reverse the protective effect of IPC in isolated cardiomyocytes, it remains unclear to what extent KATP channels contribute to IPC in humans in vivo. In patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, episodes of cardiac ischemia (caused by angioplasty balloon inflation) induce resistance of the myocardium to subsequent episodes of ischemia. This protection is prevented by administration of glibenclamide, consistent with a preconditioning effect that is dependent on KATP channels.21 We have shown recently that forearm ischemia causes endothelial dysfunction that is prevented by IPC.22 This model is suited to exploring the mechanism of preconditioning in the absence of any confounding effects caused by altered collateral blood supply or direct effects of KATP channel blockers on ECG indices of ischemia. The aims of the present study were to test the hypotheses that the KATP channel blocker glibenclamide blocks IPC and that the KATP activator diazoxide mimics IPC in the human endothelium in vivo. In addition, we sought to investigate the timing of the involvement of KATP channels in IPC to determine whether they were involved as triggers or effectors of IPC.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Techniques
Assessment of Resistance-Vessel Endothelial Function
All studies were performed in a quiet, temperature-controlled (25°C to 26°C) laboratory. The volunteers were asked to abstain from caffeine for 12 hours before the study. Brachial artery cannulation with a 27-gauge needle (Coopers Needle Works) was performed in the nondominant arm under aseptic conditions with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine (subcutaneous) for anesthesia. Drugs were administered in saline (0.9% [wt/vol] sodium chloride) and infused at a rate of 0.5 mL/min. Bilateral forearm blood flow was measured with calibrated mercury-in-silastic strain gauges as described previously.22,23 During recording periods, the hands were excluded from the circulation by inflation of wrist cuffs to 200 mm Hg. Forearm blood flow in response to infusion of endothelium-dependent dilator acetylcholine (ACh; 25, 50, and 100 nmol/min, each dose for 3 minutes; Clinalfa) was measured 10 minutes after cannulation to establish baseline endothelial function. In some studies, the response to the endothelium-independent dilator nitroglycerine (NTG; 4, 8, and 16 nmol/min, each dose for 3 minutes) was determined.
Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
The nondominant forearm was rendered ischemic by inflating a 12-cm blood pressure cuff to a pressure of 200 mm Hg around the upper arm for 20 minutes as described previously.22 Endothelial function was assessed at baseline and 15 minutes after reperfusion.
Ischemic Preconditioning
The nondominant forearm was rendered ischemic by inflating a 12-cm blood pressure cuff to a pressure of 200 mm Hg around the upper arm for 5 minutes, after which the cuff was deflated and the arm reperfused for 5 minutes. This cycle was then repeated twice so that the arm was exposed to 3 episodes of brief ischemia in total.22
Experimental Protocols
Protocol 1: Effects of IRI on Endothelial Function
Baseline endothelial function was established, after which the nondominant arm underwent IRI, and the response to ACh was reassessed after reperfusion for 15 minutes (n=13; Figure 1A).
|
Protocol 2: Effects of IPC on Endothelial Dysfunction Caused by IRI
Baseline endothelial function was established, after which the nondominant arm underwent the preconditioning protocol, followed by IRI as above. The response to ACh was reassessed after 15 minutes of reperfusion (n=10; Figure 1B). In 5 subjects, the response to NTG was determined at baseline and after IPC followed by IRI.
Protocol 3: Effect of KATP Blockade on Endothelial IPC
After baseline endothelial function was established, glibenclamide (10 µg/min; a gift from Aventis Pharma Deutschland, Frankfurt, Germany) was infused for 5 minutes and continued during the 30 minutes of the IPC protocol. After this, the arm underwent IRI, and the response to ACh was reassessed after reperfusion for 15 minutes (n=9; Figure 1C). When administered during IPC, any effect of glibenclamide may be explained by an action on the initiation (triggering) of IPC. To determine whether glibenclamide had an effect independent of the triggering of IPC, the same dose was administered for 35 minutes during IRI, after which the response to ACh was reassessed (n=6; Figure 1D). In 6 subjects, the effect of glibenclamide alone (10 µg/min for 35 minutes) on endothelial function was assessed by determining the response to ACh before and 35 minutes after cessation of the infusion.
Protocol 4: Effect of KATP Stimulation on Endothelial IRI
After baseline endothelial function was established, diazoxide (800 µg/min; Goldshield Pharmaceuticals Ltd) was infused in 8 subjects for 20 minutes into the nondominant arm. After a further 10 minutes (to allow baseline blood flow to be restored), the arm underwent the IRI protocol, after which the response to ACh was assessed (Figure 1E). In 5 subjects, the effect of diazoxide alone (800 µg/min for 20 minutes) on endothelial function was assessed by determining the response to ACh before and 45 minutes after cessation of the infusion.
Protocol 5: Effect of Coinfusion of Glibenclamide and Diazoxide on Endothelial IRI
After baseline endothelial function was established, glibenclamide (10 µg/min) was infused for 35 minutes, during which diazoxide (800 µg/min) was coinfused for 20 minutes. The arm underwent the IRI protocol, after which the response to ACh was reassessed (Figure 1F).
Calculations and Statistics
Resting forearm blood flow in both arms in the last minute of each recording period was used for analysis. The mean ratio of flow in the infused/noninfused was calculated in the immediately preceding baseline period before each drug infusion, and changes in blood flow were expressed as a percentage change relative to this baseline flow ratio.
All data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 3.00 and expressed as mean±SEM. To assess the affects of each protocol, dose-response curves were compared by paired 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttests as appropriate. In all cases, a value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of IRI and IPC on Dilator Function
ACh caused dose-dependent increases in forearm blood flow (Figure 2A). Fifteen minutes after IRI (when baseline blood flow had returned to normal), the response to ACh was significantly blunted (P=0.002; Figure 2A). IPC before IRI prevented endothelial dysfunction (P=0.40; Figure 2B). IPC followed by IRI had no effect on the response to NTG in 5 subjects (P=0.34; data not shown).
|
Effect of KATP Blockade on Endothelial IPC
Glibenclamide alone did not alter the response to ACh (P=0.52). However, glibenclamide blocked the protective effect of IPC on endothelial function when infused during the triggering phase of IPC (P=0.003; Figure 3A) and during IRI (P=0.0005; Figure 3B).
|
Effect of KATP Stimulation on Endothelial IRI
Diazoxide caused a 52±6.9% (mean±SEM) increase in blood flow, but this returned to normal by 45 minutes after the infusion was stopped (n=7). Prior infusion of diazoxide had no direct effect on the response to ACh at 45 minutes (P=0.50). Diazoxide infusion prevented endothelial dysfunction caused by IRI (Figure 4A). However, when diazoxide was administered with glibenclamide (given at a dose that blocked IPC), the protective effect of diazoxide on IRI-induced endothelial dysfunction was abolished (n=7; Figure 4B).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelial dysfunction caused by IRI has been well described in experimental animals and in humans.24 Such endothelial damage may play a pathogenic role in tissue injury during IRI by predisposing to neutrophil infiltration of tissues or microvascular obstruction, both of which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of tissue damage. Consequently, the protective effect of IPC to limit IRI may be, in part, a consequence of its salutary effect on the endothelium, promoting more effective reperfusion after relief of vascular obstruction. Mechanistically, IPC of the vascular endothelium in animal models resembles that described in other cell types, including the myocardium, and may be directly relevant to other tissue types in humans.25 In the present study, IRI substantially reduced the response of the forearm resistance vascular bed to ACh. ACh may have a preconditioning effect,26 and by using a different agonist (eg, substance P), we might have demonstrated a greater degree of endothelial dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion. Nonetheless, the present findings confirm the results of our previous study, in which we also demonstrated that the response of the smooth muscle to NTG was unaffected by IRI, which indicates that the site of injury is the endothelium. IPC completely preserved the response to ACh but, as expected, had no effect on the response to NTG. These observations exclude an effect of IPC to augment vascular smooth muscle function, which might also increase the dilator response to ACh, and indicate that IPC acts to preserve endothelium-dependent dilatation.
A large body of published data implicates activation of KATP channels in the mechanism of IPC in a variety of tissues and animal models.27 There is evidence for involvement of KATP channels on the sarcolemma and the mitochondria, based on the actions of known pharmacological modulators of channel activity.4,28 How the activation of KATP channels causes IPC has yet to be determined. Mitochondrial channels may be activated to trigger IPC via a mechanism that is dependent on production of reactive oxygen species to activate second-messenger pathways.13 In contrast, other data suggest that KATP channels are involved after IPC is triggered and distal to second-messenger pathways.29 How this increases resistance to ischemic damage is unclear, but it has been suggested that KATP activation closes the mitochondrial permeability transition pore,17 limiting the rise in intramitochondrial calcium15 and reducing mitochondrial swelling.16 KATP channels are also present on vascular smooth muscle cells30 and endothelium,31,32 and similar mechanisms of protection may be involved in blood vessels.
In human tissue, mitochondrial KATP channels are involved in preconditioning in vitro, but it is unclear at which point in the preconditioning mechanism they are activated. In humans in vivo, the action of KATP modulators has been investigated in patients undergoing angioplasty, in which the preconditioning stimulus is a brief period of ischemia caused by angioplasty balloon inflation. In such studies, ECG changes during a second balloon inflation are taken as a measure of IRI. The preconditioning inflation reduces the magnitude of these ECG changes, with evidence that KATP channel blockers limit the protection induced by the preconditioning inflation.21 However, whether this represents a direct effect of KATP channel blockade on the ECG rather than on ischemia is unclear.33
The present study sought to clarify further the role of KATP channels in the mechanism of IRI using a human in vivo model that would allow direct assessment of KATP channels in the mechanism of IPC. Glibenclamide was used to block both mitochondrial and sarcolemmal KATP channels.4,28 The dose used was based on that which had previously been shown to block the effects of KATP channel openers.34 In the present study, intra-arterial infusion of glibenclamide did not affect basal blood flow or the response to ACh, consistent with the results of other investigators.34 However, when infused during the preconditioning protocol, glibenclamide abolished the protective effect of IPC on IRI, with recurrence of endothelial dysfunction. These observations suggest that IPC activates KATP channels to limit IRI. To confirm a role for KATP channels in the mechanism of IPC, we used diazoxide (a selective activator of the mitochondrial KATP channel) to induce pharmacological preconditioning in the forearm as a prelude to IRI. At the dose infused, diazoxide caused an increase in forearm blood flow, which returned to baseline by 45 minutes. There was no direct effect of diazoxide on the response to ACh. However, diazoxide administered 15 minutes before IRI preserved the response to ACh after IRI. Moreover, when glibenclamide was infused at a dose that blocked IPC, the protective effect of diazoxide was also blocked. Taken together with the results using glibenclamide, these data clearly implicate KATP channel activation in the mechanism of endothelial preconditioning in humans in vivo, and the effect of diazoxide implicates the mitochondrial subtype. These observations cannot be explained by an effect of glibenclamide to affect collateral circulation to the arm.
The time course of activation of KATP channels was investigated by comparing the effect of glibenclamide infused during preconditioning and during ischemia. In both cases, glibenclamide had similar effects to block the protective effect of IPC. The effect of glibenclamide infused during preconditioning could be explained by inhibition of triggering or effector components of IPC (depending on the persistence of glibenclamide in tissues after the infusion was stopped). However, administration of glibenclamide after the preconditioning stimulus (thus allowing normal triggering mechanisms) and during the ischemia-reperfusion phase is best explained by an action to block the effector limb of preconditioning. A degree of myocardial and endothelial protection similar to that seen with IPC has been described recently in animal models using a modified schedule of intermittent reperfusion, termed postconditioning.35 It is possible that activation of KATP channels contributes to the protection of postconditioning, but this has yet to be described in animals or humans.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that IPC of human blood vessels in vivo involves activation of mitochondrial KATP channels and that these channels are involved in the effector limb of the mechanism. Given the similarities between the mechanism of IPC in endothelial cells and other tissues, including the myocardium, it is probable that activation of KATP channels is involved in preconditioning of human tissues in general. Our data support the requirement to demonstrate in patients the therapeutic benefit of strategies to specifically activate these channels36 or at least to preserve their activity.37
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.-X. Zhang, X.-M. Lu, S. Kimura, and A. Nishiyama Role of mitochondria in angiotensin II-induced reactive oxygen species and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2007; 76(2): 204 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Loukogeorgakis, R. Williams, A. T. Panagiotidou, S. K. Kolvekar, A. Donald, T. J. Cole, D. M. Yellon, J. E. Deanfield, and R. J. MacAllister Transient Limb Ischemia Induces Remote Preconditioning and Remote Postconditioning in Humans by a KATP Channel Dependent Mechanism Circulation, September 18, 2007; 116(12): 1386 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mayahi, S. Heales, D. Owen, J. P. Casas, J. Harris, R. J. MacAllister, and A. D. Hingorani (6R)-5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-L-Biopterin and Its Stereoisomer Prevent Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Human Forearm Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(6): 1334 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Davidson and M. R. Duchen Endothelial Mitochondria: Contributing to Vascular Function and Disease Circ. Res., April 27, 2007; 100(8): 1128 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Gross Remote preconditioning and delayed cardioprotection in skeletal muscle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1562 - R1563. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Gross Sildenafil and Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans Circulation, February 15, 2005; 111(6): 721 - 723. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |