Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:2597-2600
Published online before print July 19, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138027.80056.31
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/17/2597    most recent
01.CIR.0000138027.80056.31v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, J.R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Day, J.R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Thrombin
Right arrow Signal transduction
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2004;110:2597-2600.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cardiovascular Surgery

Clinical Inhibition of the Seven-Transmembrane Thrombin Receptor (PAR1) by Intravenous Aprotinin During Cardiothoracic Surgery

J.R.S. Day, MRCS; P.P. Punjabi, FRCS; A.M. Randi, PhD; D.O. Haskard, DM; R.C. Landis, PhD; K.M. Taylor, MD

From the British Heart Foundation Cardiac Surgery (J.R.S.D., P.P.P., K.M.T.) and Cardiovascular Medicine (A.M.R., D.O.H.) Units, Eric Bywaters Centre, Imperial College, London, UK; and Edmund Cohen Laboratory for Vascular Research (R.C.L.), Chronic Disease Research Centre, UWI, Bridgetown, Barbados.

Correspondence to J.R.S. Day, British Heart Foundation Cardiac Surgery Unit, Eric Bywaters Centre, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK. E-mail j.day{at}imperial.ac.uk

Received March 23, 2004; de novo received April 22, 2004; revision received June 16, 2004; accepted June 17, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) is the principal thrombin receptor in the vasculature, and antagonists against this receptor are in preclinical trials. Aprotinin, already approved for clinical use to reduce transfusion requirements in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery, has been shown to inhibit PAR1 activation in vitro. Here, we exploit CPB as a model for thrombin generation in humans to examine whether aprotinin can inhibit platelet PAR1 activation clinically.

Methods and Results— PAR1 expression and function on platelets was examined in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients randomized into 2 groups: (1) those receiving saline infusion during CPB (n=17) and (2) those receiving aprotinin (2x106 kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] in pump prime, 2x106 KIU loading dose, followed by 0.5x106 KIU/h [n=13]). Platelets in the saline group showed loss of PAR1-specific function at 2 hours after CPB, but this was preserved in the aprotinin group (P<0.001). These effects were most likely targeted at PAR1 receptor cleavage, because (1) the level of thrombin generated during CPB did not vary significantly between groups, (2) expression of SPAN12, which detects only uncleaved PAR1 receptors, was preserved in the aprotinin but not the placebo group (P<0.05), and (3) supporting evidence in vitro showed reduced thrombin-induced PAR1 cleavage (P<0.001) and platelet aggregation (P<0.001) in the presence of aprotinin.

Conclusions— This study demonstrates that platelet PAR1 activation by thrombin can be inhibited by aprotinin. Our results extend the clinical mechanism of action of aprotinin and provide the first proof of principle that PAR1 can be inhibited clinically. This has implications beyond cardiac surgery for the development of therapeutic PAR1 blockade.


Key Words: thrombin • platelets • cardiopulmonary bypass


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The protease-activated receptor (PAR) family comprises 4 members, PAR1 through PAR4, which are widely expressed on platelets and cells of the vasculature.1 PAR1 is the principal thrombin receptor in humans, mediating thrombin-induced aggregation of platelets and adverse events, such as proinflammatory responses, angiogenesis, cell invasion, and neurodegeneration in other cell types; thus, antagonism of PAR-1 may have broad therapeutic significance.

A number of PAR1 antagonists have been developed on the basis of the unique mechanism of PAR1 activation. PAR1 is cleaved by the serine protease activity of thrombin, creating a new N-terminal sequence (SFLLRN) that can dock in the ligand-binding pocket of the transmembrane domain and transmit G protein–coupled signals into the cell. Synthetic peptide and nonpeptide mimetics based on either the ligand or transmembrane signaling structures have been developed.2,3 A hallmark of these antagonists is that cleavage of PAR1 still occurs on activation by thrombin, even though intracellular signaling is abrogated. Ligand mimetic antagonists have shown clear therapeutic promise in preclinical trials of thrombosis and restenosis,4,5 but clinical trial data are still awaited.

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that has been used in cardiothoracic surgery to prevent blood loss and preserve platelet function during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).6,7 The platelet dysfunction in bypass is thought to be due to selective activation of PAR1 and internalization of receptor after exposure to thrombin generated in the bypass circuit.8–10 Because aprotinin has been shown to selectively inhibit PAR1-dependent platelet activation in vitro,11 we tested its ability to block PAR1 activation in vivo in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of CABG patients on bypass.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Patients referred for elective CABG were enrolled with regional ethics committee approval and after giving informed consent. Patients were randomized to receive saline infusion during bypass (group 1; n=17) or "high-dose" aprotinin (2x106 kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] in the pump prime and 2x106 KIU loading dose, followed by 0.5x106 KIU/h on CPB; group 2, n=13). Surgeons were blinded as to treatment group, and all patients underwent a routine surgical procedure and recovery using standardized techniques. Each patient received 300 IU/kg porcine heparin (Monoparin, CP Pharmaceuticals) to achieve an activated coagulation time (ACT) >480 seconds (Hemochron Jr with kaolin). ACT was measured at baseline, after heparinization, and every 30 minutes during CPB. Heparin was reversed with 200 mg protamine sulfate (Celltech Pharmaceuticals) and assessed by normalization of the ACT.

Thrombin Generation During Bypass
Thrombin generated during bypass was measured by thrombin-antithrombin complex formation in plasma, collected preoperatively, 5 minutes into bypass, at end of bypass, and 2 hours, 24 hours, and 5 days after bypass. Samples were stored at –70°C before analysis by ELISA (Affinity Biologicals).

Platelet PAR1 Expression and Function Ex Vivo
Expression of uncleaved PAR1 was detected with the antibody SPAN12 (Beckman Coulter).12 Blood was drawn preoperatively and at 2 hours and anticoagulated with sodium citrate, and SPAN12 expression was determined by flow cytometry of platelet-rich plasma as described previously.13 All steps were performed at 4°C to prevent internalization of cleaved receptors. PAR1 function was analyzed by tricolor flow cytometry in whole blood that measured the formation of thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP)-6–dependent platelet:leukocyte conjugates.10 Whole blood was diluted (3:7) in modified Tyrode’s buffer,10 and 100-µL aliquots were incubated at room temperature with TRAP-6 (SFLLRN hexapeptide; Bachem Ltd; 20 µmol/L) or buffer. After 10 minutes’ incubation, samples were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and stained with the following monoclonal antibodies: pan-leukocyte marker CD45-FITC, the monocyte marker CD14-ECD, and the platelet marker CD42b-PE (Beckman Coulter). Leukocyte populations were identified with CD45-FITC and CD14-ECD fluorescence, and then CD42b-PE was used to calculate the percentage of platelets adherent to each leukocyte population.

In Vitro PAR1 Expression and Platelet Aggregation
Washed platelets were obtained from platelet-rich plasma, and aggregation was performed in response to 3 nmol/L thrombin (Sigma Aldrich) as described previously.11 The PAR1 peptide antagonist FLLRN (Bachem) was included at 500 µmol/L and aprotinin at 50, 100, and 200 KIU/mL. To detect PAR1 cleavage, platelets were activated with thrombin for 10 minutes, stained with SPAN-12 at 4°C, and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde before flow cytometric analysis.12

Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between multiple groups were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test, except for platelet aggregation (Figure 2A), which used a Dunnett post hoc test ("thrombin" as reference group). A Student’s t test was used to compare thrombin-antithrombin levels between aprotinin and saline groups (Figure 1A). Significance was assumed at P<0.05.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Thrombin generation during bypass was assessed from thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex formation in plasma (mean±SEM). Pre indicates prebypass. B, Platelet PAR-1 function was assessed perioperatively based on TRAP-6–inducible platelet:leukocyte conjugate formation. Boxes show median and quartiles, whiskers indicate 5th and 95th percentiles. 2h Post indicates 2 hours after CPB. C, PAR1 receptor cleavage was measured by loss of SPAN12 expression. Results are expressed as mean relative fluorescent intensity (RFI) of staining, calculated by dividing mean fluorescent staining intensity with SPAN-12 antibody at any given time point by staining intensity of class-matched control antibody±SEM. 2h Post indicates 2 hours after CPB.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Platelet aggregation (representative traces) and B, SPAN12 expression in washed platelets after thrombin activation (3 nmol/L). RFI indicates relative fluorescent intensity.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Aprotinin Inhibits Platelet PAR1 Activation During CABG Surgery With Bypass
Thirty patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom had uncomplicated postoperative recoveries. Thrombin generation (as assessed by thrombin-antithrombin complex formation) was sharply increased perioperatively, consistent with previous reports,8,9 but did not differ significantly between groups up to 2 hours after bypass (Figure 1A). At 24 hours, however, thrombin generation was significantly reduced in the aprotinin group compared with the saline group (P=0.037) but was no longer reduced by 5 days. The functional status of PAR1 perioperatively was probed by examination of the formation of TRAP-6–inducible platelet:leukocyte conjugates in whole blood.10 This test revealed a significant drop in PAR1 function in the saline treatment group, which was most pronounced at 2 hours after bypass (Figure 1B). Platelets from the aprotinin group, however, were significantly protected compared with saline (P<0.001). Spontaneous platelet:leukocyte conjugate formation and platelet responses to ADP or epinephrine remained unchanged during bypass and between groups (data not shown), which demonstrates that platelet desensitization was selective for PAR1. Expression of the SPAN12 epitope, which detects uncleaved PAR1, confirmed that significantly less receptor activation took place in the aprotinin than in the saline group (P<0.05; Figure 1C).

Inhibition of PAR1 Receptor Cleavage In Vitro
In vitro experiments used washed platelets, free of detectable clotting factors and other soluble plasma proteins,11 and thrombin at 3 nmol/L, a concentration that selectively activates PAR1 (ie, not PAR4).3,14 In this model, aggregation was essentially abolished by the peptide-mimetic FLLRN (Figure 2A) and significantly inhibited by 50, 100, and 200 KIU/mL aprotinin (respectively, 37.5±6.5% inhibition [mean±SEM, n=10; P<0.001], 41.3±11.02% [P<0.05], and 43.63±3.41% [P<0.001]). Loss of SPAN12 epitope was inhibited by aprotinin (P<0.001) but not by the PAR1 peptide antagonist FLLRN (P>0.05), which suggests a distinct mechanism of action for aprotinin aimed at preventing PAR1 cleavage.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our results in CABG patients on bypass constitute the first clinical data showing that PAR1 activation by thrombin can be inhibited clinically. The sparing of PAR1 receptor cleavage, both in vivo and in vitro, rules out the likelihood that effects seen clinically were due to indirect targeting of plasma proteases such as plasmin or kallikrein. It is also unlikely that effects seen clinically were due to differences in thrombin generation, because this did not vary significantly between groups up to 2 hours after bypass.

Interestingly, blockade of platelet PAR1 by aprotinin does not exacerbate bleeding, because platelets maintain their ability to be activated by other stimuli, such as collagen and ADP.11 Thus, aprotinin minimizes participation of thrombin-activated platelets in the coagulation cascade, thereby exerting a net antithrombotic effect, whereas the hemostatic capacity of platelets in surgical wounds is maintained.

The PAR1 sparing mechanism identified here is distinct from other peptidomimetics in that (1) aprotinin inhibits both signaling and receptor cleavage in response to thrombin, whereas peptidomimetics inhibit signaling, not receptor cleavage,2 and (2) aprotinin does not inhibit signaling caused by TRAP-6 (Figure 1B and Poullis et al11), whereas peptidomimetics do.2,3 However, the obvious hypothesis, that aprotinin as a serine protease inhibitor directly inhibits the catalytic activity of thrombin in solution, is unlikely, because the systemic concentration of aprotinin achievable during bypass is {approx}60-fold below the inhibitory constant (Ki) for thrombin.15

The PAR1-sparing mechanism described here places aprotinin into a distinct category of PAR1 antagonists, with implications beyond its primary use as a hemostatic agent during cardiac surgery. The present study demonstrates that PAR1 activation by thrombin can be inhibited therapeutically; however, we are not advocating extending the therapeutic role of aprotinin beyond its current license. Aprotinin is uniquely well suited to cardiac surgery with CPB, because it combines a well-documented antifibrinolytic hemostatic benefit with platelet preservation, protection from the systemic inflammatory response, and significant reduction in perioperative stroke.6,7,16,17 Such a broad pharmacotherapeutic profile may be less beneficial in other disease states in which fibrinolysis is not as important. This study may also explain the reduction in perioperative stroke, because stroke patients have been shown to manifest similar platelet exhaustion due to cleavage of PAR1.18

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that aprotinin inhibits PAR1 activation by thrombin during CPB, with clinical implications for platelet function and perioperative stroke, and we have proven the principle that PAR1 can be inhibited clinically.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation (D.O.H., R.C.L., K.M.T).


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Ossovskaya VS, Bunnett NW. Protease-activated receptors: contribution to physiology and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 579–621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Andrade-Gordon P, Maryanoff BE, Derian CK, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological characterization of a peptide-mimetic antagonist for a tethered-ligand receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 12257–12262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Covic L, Misra M, Badar J, et al. Pepducin-based intervention of thrombin-receptor signaling and systemic platelet activation. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 1161–1165.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Andrade-Gordon P, Derian CK, Maryanoff BE, et al. Administration of a potent antagonist of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) attenuates vascular restenosis following balloon angioplasty in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001; 298: 34–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Derian CK, Damiano BP, Addo MF, et al. Blockade of the thrombin receptor protease-activated receptor-1 with a small-molecule antagonist prevents thrombus formation and vascular occlusion in nonhuman primates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003; 304: 855–861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Taylor KM, et al. Effect of aprotinin on need for blood transfusion in patients with septic endocarditis having open-heart surgery. Lancet. 1988; 1: 366–367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. van Oeveren W, Harder MP, Roozendaal KJ, et al. Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990; 99: 788–796.[Abstract]
  8. Boisclair MD, Lane DA, Philippou H, et al. Thrombin production, inactivation and expression during open heart surgery measured by assays for activation fragments including a new ELISA for prothrombin fragment F1 + 2. Thromb Haemost. 1993; 70: 253–258.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Brister SJ, Ofosu FA, Buchanan MR. Thrombin generation during cardiac surgery: is heparin the ideal anticoagulant? Thromb Haemost. 1993; 70: 259–262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Singh A, et al. The platelet thrombin receptor and postoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 65: 352–358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Poullis M, Manning R, Laffan M, et al. The antithrombotic effect of aprotinin: actions mediated via the protease activated receptor 1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120: 370–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Brass LF, Pizarro S, Ahuja M, et al. Changes in the structure and function of the human thrombin receptor during receptor activation, internalization, and recycling. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 2943–2952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Day JRS, Malik I, Weerasinghe A, et al. Distinct yet complementary mechanisms of heparin and glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors on platelet activation and aggregation: implications for restenosis during percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. 2004; 90: 794–799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kahn ML, Nakanishi-Matsui M, Shapiro MJ, et al. Protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 mediate activation of human platelets by thrombin. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 879–887.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Pintigny D, Dachary-Prigent J. Aprotinin can inhibit the proteolytic activity of thrombin: a fluorescence and an enzymatic study. Eur J Biochem. 1992; 207: 89–95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Gott JP, Cooper WA, Schmidt FE Jr, et al. Modifying risk for extracorporeal circulation: trial of four antiinflammatory strategies. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 747–753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Frumento RJ, O’Malley CM, Bennett-Guerrero E. Stroke after cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis of the effect of aprotinin dosing regimens. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75: 479–483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jurk K, Jahn UR, Van Aken H, et al. Platelets in patients with acute ischemic stroke are exhausted and refractory to thrombin, due to cleavage of the seven-transmembrane thrombin receptor (PAR-1). Thromb Haemost. 2004; 91: 334–344.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Related Article:


Circulation 2004 110: 2551. [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. M. Mengistu, K. D. Rohm, J. Boldt, J. Mayer, S. W. Suttner, and S. N. Piper
The Influence of Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid on Platelet Function and Postoperative Blood Loss in Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
R. C. Becker
Emerging constructs to maintain safety among patients with acute coronary syndromes requiring surgical coronary revascularization
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2008; 10(suppl_D): D12 - D22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. D. McEvoy, S. T. Reeves, J. G. Reves, and F. G. Spinale
Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Conventional and Novel Mechanisms of Action
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 949 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
R. A. Kahn, M. E. Stone, and D. M. Moskowitz
Anesthetic Consideration for Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2007; 11(3): 205 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. C. Body and C. D. Mazer
Pro: Aprotinin Has a Good Efficacy and Safety Profile Relative to Other Alternatives for Prevention of Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1354 - 1359.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
J. M Murkin
Pathophysiological Basis of CNS Injury in Cardiac Surgical Patients: Detection and Prevention
Perfusion, July 1, 2006; 21(4): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
J. R. S. Day, R. C. Landis, and K. M. Taylor
Aprotinin and the protease-activated receptor 1 thrombin receptor: antithrombosis, inflammation, and stroke reduction.
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2006; 10(2): 132 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Jaggers and J. H. Lawson
Coagulopathy and Inflammation in Neonatal Heart Surgery: Mechanisms and Strategies
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): S2360 - S2366.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y. Ozier and S. Schlumberger
Pharmacological approaches to reducing blood loss and transfusions in the surgical patient: [Approches pharmacologiques de reduction des pertes sanguines et des transfusions en chirurgie]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6_suppl): S21 - S29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Weerasinghe, T. Athanasiou, P. Philippidis, J. Day, K. Mandal, O. Warren, J. Anderson, and K. Taylor
Platelet-monocyte pro-coagulant interactions in on-pump coronary surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 29(3): 312 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R.S. Day, D. O. Haskard, K. M. Taylor, and R. C. Landis
Effect of Aprotinin and Recombinant Variants on Platelet Protease-Activated Receptor 1 Activation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 619 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R.S. Day, K. M. Taylor, E. A. Lidington, J. C. Mason, D. O. Haskard, A. M. Randi, and R. C. Landis
Aprotinin inhibits proinflammatory activation of endothelial cells by thrombin through the protease-activated receptor 1
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2006; 131(1): 21 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. H. Levy
Overview of clinical efficacy and safety of pharmacologic strategies for blood conservation
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 15, 2005; 62(18_Supplement_4): S15 - S19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. A. Khan, C. Bianchi, E. Araujo, P. Voisine, S.-H. Xu, J. Feng, J. Li, and F. W. Sellke
Aprotinin Preserves Cellular Junctions and Reduces Myocardial Edema After Regional Ischemia and Cardioplegic Arrest
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-196 - I-201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. van der Linden, G. Lindvall, and U. Sartipy
Aprotinin Decreases Postoperative Bleeding and Number of Transfusions in Patients on Clopidogrel Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-276 - I-280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Akowuah, V. Shrivastava, B. Jamnadas, D. Hopkinson, P. Sarkar, R. Storey, P. Braidley, and G. Cooper
Comparison of Two Strategies for the Management of Antiplatelet Therapy During Urgent Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 149 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. A. Khan, C. Bianchi, P. Voisine, J. Sandmeyer, J. Feng, and F. W. Sellke
Aprotinin Inhibits Protease-Dependent Platelet Aggregation and Thrombosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1545 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/17/2597    most recent
01.CIR.0000138027.80056.31v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, J.R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Day, J.R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Thrombin
Right arrow Signal transduction
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrowRelated Article