(Circulation. 2005;111:2391-2397.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Valvular Heart Disease |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (D.D., D.M.-Z., J.-F.A., H.C., J.C.B., M.E.-S.) and the Section of Biostatistics (C.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail Sarano.maurice{at}mayo.edu
Received October 8, 2004; revision received December 20, 2004; accepted January 11, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We prospectively enrolled 124 patients with chronic organic MR (aged 63±15 years, 60% males) in whom we measured BNP level and simultaneously quantified MR degree, left ventricular (LV) remodeling, and left atrial (LA) volumes and analyzed long-term outcome. Baseline BNP level (54±67 pg/mL, median 31 pg/mL) was associated univariately with multiple clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, but in multivariate analysis, independent determinants of BNP, beyond age and sex (both P
0.01), were LV end-systolic volume index, LA volume, atrial fibrillation, and symptoms (all P<0.02). Conversely, MR degree was not independently associated with BNP. During follow-up, patients with high versus low BNP (
31 versus <31 pg/mL) displayed lower survival rates (at 5 years, 72±10% versus 95±5%, P=0.03) and higher rates of the combined end point of death and heart failure (at 5 years, 42±10% versus 16±7%, P=0.03). In multivariate analysis, with adjustment for age, sex, functional class, MR severity, and ejection fraction, BNP was independently predictive of mortality (hazard ratio per 10 pg/mL, 1.23 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.48], P=0.004) and of death or heart failure (hazard ratio per 10 pg/mL, 1.09 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.19], P=0.04).
Conclusions BNP activation in organic MR reflects primarily ventricular and atrial consequences rather than degree of MR. Higher BNP level in patients with organic MR independently predicts adverse events under conservative management. Therefore, BNP activation in organic MR is an emerging biomarker of severity of MR consequences and of poor clinical outcome, and its assessment should be considered in the clinical evaluation and risk stratification of patients with MR.
Key Words: natriuretic peptides echocardiography regurgitation prognosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, in chronic organic MR, BNP physiological determinants and outcome implications are undefined. Indeed, it is unclear whether BNP purely reflects the symptoms9,10 or MR severity9 or whether it is a biomarker of ventricular and atrial alterations due to the MR. Furthermore, no study has yet analyzed BNP implications for subsequent survival and development of heart failure. Such an outcome link would be important, because few markers of high risk under conservative management exist to guide clinical decision making.1
Therefore, we prospectively enrolled patients with chronic organic MR, measured BNP levels simultaneous to extensive clinical and Doppler echocardiographic assessment, and analyzed their outcome under medical management. We hypothesized that BNP is essentially determined by the adverse physiological consequences of MR, rather than by its degree, and that BNP is an independent determinant of outcome under medical management. The verification of these hypotheses would pave the way for routine utilization of BNP in the risk stratification and management of patients with MR.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doppler Echocardiography
Comprehensive Doppler echocardiography was performed. MR was quantified by 3 methods: quantitative Doppler with mitral and aortic stroke volumes,15,16 quantitative 2D echocardiography with LV stroke volumes,15,17 and the proximal isovelocity surface area method.2 These methods were averaged, which allowed calculation of regurgitant volume, regurgitation fraction (RF), and effective regurgitant orifice.18 LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes and ejection fraction were measured by Simpson disk method as recommended.19 LA volume was measured by the biplane area-length method with 2 orthogonal apical views at end systole.20 Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) was measured with tricuspid regurgitant velocity. Cardiac index was calculated with pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography.
Blood Sampling
Blood sampling was obtained for all patients immediately after enrollment in the echocardiographic laboratory. After patients had been in a supine position for at least 30 minutes, a blood sample was drawn from a peripheral vein, immediately placed on ice, and transferred to the laboratory facilities in the same campus. After plasma extraction, BNP and 35-cGMP were measured by standard radioimmunoassay.14,21,22
Statistical Analysis
Results are presented as mean±SD or percentages. Group comparisons were performed with ANOVA, t test, or
2 test as appropriate. Associations of baseline BNP (dependent variable) to independent variables (Table 1) were tested with linear and nonparametric regressions (categorical variables). Analyses were performed overall and stratified by symptoms, RF, and LA volume classes. Multivariate analysis with stepwise multiple linear regression was used to define independent determinants of BNP levels and included adjustment for age and sex. Because pulmonary pressure could not be measured in all patients, initial models did not include it, but the final model was rerun with the addition of this variable to assess its potential additive predictive value. As an adjunctive analysis, BNP was stratified in 4 categories (below BNP median [<31 pg/mL] and with division of values greater than the median into 3 categories: 31 to 60, 61 to 90, and >90 pg/mL). We then calculated with logistic regression analysis the ORs of an upward category change in BNP according to increments of independent determinants. Outcome after diagnosis was analyzed under conservative management by censoring at death or last follow-up for patients who did not undergo surgery and at surgery for those who did (64 patients ultimately underwent surgery, up to 6 years after diagnosis). Events analyzed were total mortality and the combined end point of mortality or new heart failure with rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and tested by log rank. Evaluation of BNP as a predictor of outcome used the Cox proportional hazards analysis, univariately and after adjustment for age, sex, effective regurgitant orifice, symptoms, and ejection fraction,23 with calculation of adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. P<0.05 was considered significant.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50%). SPAP measurable in 113 patients was 38±11 mm Hg. BNP plasma level was 54±67 pg/mL, with a wide range (0.10 to 410 pg/mL, median 31 pg/mL). Overall, BNP level correlated with that of its biological second messenger cGMP (r=0.38, P<0.0001). Higher BNP category (BNP <31, 31 to 60, 61 to 90, or >90 pg/mL) was associated with higher cGMP level (respectively, 2.9±2.2, 4.5±3.2, 4.3±2.8, and 6.3±5.0 pg/mL; P=0.0002).
Determinant of BNP in MR
For display purposes, patients were divided according to BNP median (31 pg/mL). Table 1 summarizes comparisons between groups with high and low BNP and correlations between explanatory variables and BNP. Patients with higher versus lower BNP level (
31 pg/mL versus <31 pg/mL) were older, more symptomatic, and more often in AF (all P<0.002) and had higher SPAP and higher LA volume (both P<0.0001), with trends toward more severe MR and larger end-systolic volume index (ESVI). All of these variables (Table 1) showed significant correlations with BNP level (all P
0.02). Stratified by symptom class (Figure 1) and MR severity (Figure 2), BNP level increased significantly with symptom severity (P<0.0001) and tended to increase with MR severity (P=0.08), but within each class, a wide range of BNP level was observed, with large overlap between consecutive classes.
|
|
In multivariate linear regression analysis (Table 2) with adjustment for age and sex, independent predictors of high BNP level were mainly consequences of MR (symptoms, ESVI, LA volume, and AF; P<0.02 for all). Association between BNP level and LA volume (Figure 3) showed an overlap between classes, but BNP levels
100 pg/mL were observed almost exclusively in patients with marked LA enlargement. Importantly, MR degree (RF) was univariately but not independently associated with BNP level. When SPAP was added to the model, it was additionally independently associated with BNP level (P<0.0001). These results were not altered after exclusion of endocarditic and rheumatic lesions. Adjusted ORs of higher BNP category (95% CI) for specific increments of ESVI, LA, and presence of AF after multivariate logistic regression analysis are indicated in Table 2. New York Heart Association symptom class was not independently predictive of higher BNP category with logistic analysis.
|
|
Outcome Analysis
Under medical management of MR (between diagnosis and last follow-up or surgery), 7 patients died, and 11 patients incurred congestive heart failure. Patients with higher (
31 pg/mL) compared with lower (<31 pg/mL) levels of BNP experienced lower survival (at 5 years, 72±10% versus 95±5%, P=0.03; Figure 4) with a univariate HR per 10 pg/mL of 1.17 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.28; P=0.003). After adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, ejection fraction, and effective regurgitant orifice, BNP level was independently predictive of survival, with an adjusted HR of 1.23 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.48) per 10 pg/mL (P=0.004).
|
Combined adverse events (death or heart failure) occurred at higher rates in patients with BNP
31 versus <31 pg/mL (at 5 years, 42±10% versus 16±7%, P=0.03; Figure 5), with a univariate HR of 1.12 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.19) per 10 pg/mL (P=0.004). After adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, ejection fraction, and effective regurgitant orifice, BNP independently predicted death or heart failure (adjusted HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.19] per 10 pg/mL, P=0.04). Outcome analyses were unchanged after exclusion of patients with endocarditic and rheumatic lesions.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rationale of the Study
BNP, synthesized and released by overloaded myocardium,21,24,25 has natriuretic and vasodilator properties mediated by its second messenger, cGMP.13,25 MR causes volume overload with LA enlargement26,27 and LV remodeling8,28,29 and induces BNP activation.9,10 The present study confirms BNP activation in chronic organic MR and shows that it is biologically active, with parallel cGMP elevation.
In heart failure and coronary disease, BNP level reflects the magnitude of hemodynamic and LV alterations and predicts outcome,11,14,30 is linked to the presence of functional MR,31 and is a major biomarker of risk,32,33 so that BNP measurement was recently recommended as integral to clinical management.3436 In organic MR, there is a profound need for such a biomarker, because the identification of high-risk patients is essential for clinical management and to indicate when surgery is necessary.1,23 Currently proven risk markers in organic MR, symptoms23 and LV dysfunction,4,23,29 are observed in a minority of patients and late in the disease course, such that these markers are associated with poor postoperative outcome.4,37 MR surgery before such markers are present was proposed, but selection of potential candidates remains controversial,23,37,38 requiring new markers of cardiac remodeling and poor outcome under medical management. Demonstration that BNP activation may be such a marker is of considerable importance and may provide substantial help in the clinical management of patients with MR.
Determinants of BNP Activation
In previous limited MR series, BNP primarily reflected functional class.9,10 Such a conclusion would restrain the use of BNP, because symptoms are readily assessed clinically. The present study reveals BNP activation and physiological significance in organic MR, which reflect combined cardiac alterations due to MR. Indeed, despite MR progression, symptoms may be absent, in contrast to subclinical complications initiated by MR.39 Volume overload induces LV remodeling and dysfunction, which leads to poor outcome.46,8,23,29 Importantly, a larger ESVI7 independently determines a higher BNP level. The ESVI-BNP association in MR was not observed previously, possibly because of insensitive methods used to assess LV remodeling (diameter9 versus volumes40). Similarly, MR induces LA overload and enlargement and subsequent AF, which leads to heart failure and poor prognosis.23,27 Remarkably, higher BNP independently reflects atrial enlargement and fibrillation, which, in contrast to lone AF,20 reveals differences in arrhythmia mechanism due to atrial overload in MR.41 In addition, LA volume measurement better reflects LA overload than a single diameter,9 revealing strong associations between LA consequences of MR and BNP activation. Finally, the additive association with BNP activation of pulmonary pressures, determined by both reduced LA compliance and degree of MR,42 furthers the concept that BNP level integrates various untoward MR consequences. BNP association with MR consequences, independent of known BNP links with age and sex,43 does not merely reflect an association of BNP with degree of MR and may contrast with BNP determinants in heart failure.31 Furthermore, BNP overlap between MR grades (Figure 2) clearly shows that BNP is not a surrogate for MR degree and cannot be used clinically for this purpose. Therefore, BNP activation is essentially determined by adverse hemodynamic, ventricular, and atrial alterations due to MR and consequently denotes the fact that organic MR is complicated by serious consequences.
BNP and MR Outcome
The hypothesis that BNP is a predictor of outcome in patients with MR stems from outcome studies conducted in patients with heart failure or ischemic heart disease that showed BNP as a strong independent predictor of mortality and morbidity.11,12,33 A similar predictive value in chronic MR that allows identification of high-risk patients under medical management is of great interest. Indeed, the only clinical characteristics predictive of outcome under medical management, overt symptoms and LV dysfunction,23 are observed in a minority of patients1,23 and late in the course of the disease.4,37 The current high-feasibility, low-risk, and excellent long-term outcome of valve repair44 suggest that patients at high risk under medical management should be considered for surgery irrespective of symptoms. This seminal study was designed to examine long-term follow-up after diagnosis and denotes for the first time that BNP activation is a new independent predictor of death and congestive heart failure in MR. The risk attached to higher BNP levels is notable and is almost unaffected by adjustment. Therefore, the outcome implication of BNP activation is not just a surrogate for consequences or degree of MR but is additive to other descriptors of MR severity and predictors of outcome.23,45
The results of the present study extend BNP prognostic value to valvular diseases, specifically to MR. These promising data, with relatively large CIs of risk, suggest the need for large-cohort studies of patients with MR but suggest important clinical implications of BNP measurement.
Clinical Implications
The findings of the present study, which shows that BNP activation reflects severe consequences of MR and is a marker of poor outcome, suggest that BNP should be added to the clinical armamentarium; however, BNP measurement cannot be substituted for MR quantification, which should follow guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography. In organic MR, BNP activation reflects serious MR consequences irrespective of its degree. These consequences are measurable by Doppler echocardiography, but such measurements are not performed consistently in routine practice. In this context, BNP activation should direct the attention of clinicians toward more severe LA, LV, and hemodynamic consequences than may appear with a cursory evaluation.40 Such patients should be evaluated carefully, and additional quantitative and hemodynamic measurements may be indicated.
In view of the association of BNP activation with worse outcome, careful clinical attention should be directed to patients with such activation, and the need for mitral surgery should be considered anew. If prompt mitral surgery does not appear to be in the best interest of patients with MR and BNP activation, they should be monitored closely, with follow-up visits scheduled within a short time frame.
The association of BNP activation with both severe MR consequences and poor outcome suggests that BNP measurement is a promising research tool in the population of patients with MR. Indeed, BNP appears to be a legitimate end point in clinical trials evaluating the medical treatment of MR.
Study Limitations
The scope of this study was not to address all points of interest and biological mechanisms with regard to BNP in MR. We focused on major consequences and outcome of MR, which provided novel and important information. Cost-benefit and further outcome analyses should be performed, and analysis of BNP activation progression with progression of MR consequences would be useful in confirming causal mechanistic relationships. To address these important questions, very large populations will be required. However, the seminal data presented here pave the way for these analyses to be conducted in various population strata in future large prospective studies. The value of quantitative Doppler echocardiographic methods has been debated; however, LV volumes are reliable with high-resolution imaging, LA volume has been measured to describe LA remodeling,20,46 and MR has been quantified by 3 validated methods.1517
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Kerr, O. C. Raffel, G. A. Whalley, I. Zeng, and R. A. Stewart Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide despite normal left ventricular function on rest and exercise stress echocardiography in mitral regurgitation Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 363 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Baumgartner Neurohormones in valvular heart disease: what can they tell us? Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 290 - 292. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Casaclang-Verzosa, B. J. Gersh, and T. S.M. Tsang Structural and functional remodeling of the left atrium: clinical and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Daniels and A. S. Maisel Natriuretic Peptides J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2007; 50(25): 2357 - 2368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lee and T. H. Marwick Assessment of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2007; 8(3): 175 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Griffin Timing of Surgical Intervention in Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: Is Vigilance Enough? Circulation, May 9, 2006; 113(18): 2169 - 2172. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
BNP's Prognostic Value in Mitral Regurgitation Journal Watch Cardiology, July 8, 2005; 2005(708): 4 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |