| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;111:1006-1011.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Hypertension |
From INSERM Unit 541 (D.Y.) and Department of Physiology (B.I.L.), AP-HP-Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France; UMR-CNRS 6188, University of Angers, Angers, France (L.L., C.B., D.H.); and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (R.E.W.).
Correspondence to D. Henrion, PharmD, PhD, Laboratoire de Physiologie, UMR-CNRS 6188, Faculté de Médecine, 49045 Angers, France. E-mail daniel.henrion{at}med.univ-angers.fr
Received May 20, 2004; revision received September 28, 2004; accepted November 10, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We recorded mean arterial pressure (MAP) and investigated AT2R by Western blot analysis, immunohistochemistry, and function in isolated mesenteric resistance arteries (205 µm in diameter) from Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) receiving the following for 4 weeks in drinking water: placebo, AT1R blockade (candesartan; 2 mg/kg per day), ACE inhibitor (perindopril; 3 mg/kg per day), nonselective vasodilator (hydralazine; 16 or 24 mg/kg per day), or candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day). In precontracted isolated arteries, AT2R stimulation (angiotensin II in the presence of candesartan) caused vasodilation in WKY rats (MAP=118 mm Hg) and vasoconstriction in SHR (MAP=183 mm Hg). In SHR treated with candesartan (MAP=146 mm Hg) or hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day; MAP=145 mm Hg), AT2R-induced contraction was reduced by 50%. In SHR treated with perindopril (MAP=125 mm Hg), AT2R stimulation induced vasodilation. In SHR treated with hydralazine (24 mg/kg per day; MAP=105 mm Hg) and in SHR treated with hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day) plus candesartan (MAP=102 mm Hg), an AT2R-mediated vasodilation was restored. Immunochemistry and Western blot analysis showed that AT2R expression, lower in SHR than in WKY rats, was restored to normal levels by treatments reducing arterial pressure in SHR.
Conclusions Our results suggest that in resistance arteries of SHR, (1) AT2R is downregulated by hypertension, and (2) specific and nonspecific antihypertensive treatments restore AT2R expression and vasodilator functions.
Key Words: angiotensin receptors vasculature vasodilation hypertension
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 956
,16 whereas in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), flow (shear stress) stimulation of the endothelium is associated with an AT1R and endothelin-1 type A receptor activation, thus counteracting endothelium-dependent dilation.17 Furthermore, acute administration of an AT2R inhibitor reversed both the acute antihypertensive effects and elevated level of bradykinin, NO, and cGMP in renal interstitial fluid caused by AT1R blockade in renal wrap and salt-restricted rats.18,19 Finally, we have recently shown the reproducibility of the vasodilator effect of AT2R stimulation under acute and chronic AT1R blockade,20 further supporting the assumption that AT2R stimulation might play a role in the antihypertensive effect of AT1R-blocking drugs. Thus, we speculate that AT2R stimulation, and hence vasodilation, might play a role in antihypertensive treatments, especially when AT1R-blocking agents are used. Indeed, AT1R antagonists induce an important rise in circulating Ang II. AT2R might then be chronically overstimulated, participating in the maintenance of vasodilation, particularly because this effect was not easily desensitized.20
Thus, in the present study we evaluated the vasomotor role of AT2R in resistance arteries isolated from SHR (hypertensive conditions) and after various chronic antihypertensive treatments, including ACE inhibition, AT1R blockade or a nonselective treatment, and AT2R expression and immunolocation. We hypothesized that AT2R-mediated dilation, which was impaired in untreated SHR, would be reestablished in mesenteric arteries taken from treated SHR in parallel with reductions in blood pressure.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The protocol used was in accordance with the European Community standards on the care and use of laboratory animals (authorization No. 00577).
Mean Arterial Pressure Measurement
After 4 weeks of treatment, rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IP). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured in the right carotid artery with a catheter connected to a GOULD transducer and an analog-digital signal recording system (Biopac).16,17
Isolated Mesenteric Artery
A 3- to 4-mm-long segment of mesenteric artery (205±11 µm, internal diameter measured at 75 mm Hg in the absence of tone) was dissected, cannulated at both ends, and mounted in a video-monitored perfusion system,21 as we have previously described.16,17,20 Briefly, arteries were bathed in a physiological salt solution (PSS) maintained at 37°C, pH 7.4. The PO2 was 160 mm Hg and the PCO2 37 mm Hg.16,17,20 The artery was superfused (4 mL/min), and flow through the vessel was maintained at a rate of 100 µL/min, with intraluminal pressure set at 75 mm Hg.20 Arterial diameter was measured (Living Systems Instrumentations) and recorded continuously (Biopac). Vessels were allowed to stabilize for at least 30 minutes before drugs were added to the PSS superfusion. The integrity of the endothelium was assessed by testing the relaxing effect of acetylcholine (1 µmol/L) after precontraction with phenylephrine (1 µmol/L). The arteries were then exposed to candesartan (100 nmol/L) for at least 30 minutes before exposure to Ang II while they were precontracted with phenylephrine (1 µmol/L) and serotonin (0.1 µmol/L) to induce a stable reduction in diameter. When this response had reached a plateau, a concentration-response curve to Ang II at 0.1 to 100 nmol/L or Ang II at 100 nmol/L was performed, and changes in diameter were measured. Acetylcholine (1 µmol/L) was used to completely dilate the vessels. Eight rats were used in each group.
In separate series of experiments (n=5 per group), AT2R stimulation was repeated before and after application of one of the following drugs: the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (10 µmol/L), the thromboxane A2-PGH2 receptor blocker SQ29548 (10 µmol/L), the bradykinin B2 receptor blocker HOE140 (0.1 µmol/L), and the endothelin receptor blocker bosentan (10 µmol/L).
Stimulation of AT2R was also performed before and after endothelium removal (5 seconds of air perfusion; n=4 rats per group) in WKY rats, untreated SHR, and SHR treated with candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day).
Western Blot Analysis of AT2R
Western blot analysis of AT2R was performed in mesenteric resistance arteries of WKY rats and SHR (n=8 per group). Mesenteric arteries were also isolated from SHR treated with hydralazine (24 mg/kg per day for 18, 23, or 48 days; n=5 per group) or with candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day; n=5 per group). Mesenteric arteries were homogenized with a lysis buffer (1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate, 2.5 mg/L leupeptin, and 5 mg/L aprotinin). Extracts were incubated at 25°C for 30 minutes and then centrifuged (1000g, 15 minutes, 14°C). Protein concentration was determined with the use of the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). After denaturation at 100°C for 5 minutes, equal amounts of proteins (15 µg) were loaded on a 9% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for 12 hours (40 V, 4°C). Membranes were blocked with 10% BSA in TBST (20 mmol/L Tris [pH 8.0], 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 hour and were then incubated with AT2R rabbit polyclonal antibody (dilution 1:100, Santa Cruz) in washing solution at room temperature for 20 hours. The membranes were then washed and incubated with the anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase antibody (dilution 1:5000; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 hour at room temperature. After 3 washes with TBST, immunocomplexes were detected by chemiluminescent reaction (ECL kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with a computer-based imaging system (Fuji LAS 1000 Plus; Fuji Medical Systems). Quantification was performed by densitometric analysis.
Immunofluorescence Analysis of AT2R
Segments of mesenteric resistance arteries (n=6 rats per group) were mounted in embedding medium (Miles, Inc), frozen in isopentane precooled in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80°C on transverse cross sections 7 µm thick. Sections were incubated with candesartan (30 minutes, 10 nmol/L, 25°C), then with fluorescent Ang II (FITC-bound Ang II, 30 minutes, 10 pmol/L, 25°C; Molecular Probes). Fluorescence staining was visualized by confocal microscopy (Biorad MRC-600). Control experiments were performed after incubation with nonfluorescent Ang II. Image analysis was performed with the use of Histolab (Microvision). Briefly, pixel quantification was performed after the media and the endothelial layer were separated. Data are given as percentage of control (with fluorescence in WKY rats taken as 100%).
Drugs
Candesartan cilexetil was kindly provided by AstraZeneca (Sweden). Other products were purchased from Sigma.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. The significance of the different treatments was determined by ANOVA or 2-tailed Student paired t test. Probability values <0.05 were considered significant. Number of rats was used for the analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The contraction induced by Ang II (100 nmol/L) in arteries isolated from SHR was significantly reduced by indomethacin (10 µmol/L; 6±2 versus 12±3 µm reduction in diameter; n=5), SQ29548 (10 µmol/L; 6±3 versus 14±3 µm reduction in diameter; n=5) and by bosentan (10 µmol/L; 7±3 versus 16±3 µm reduction in diameter; n=5). The combination of indomethacin (10 µmol/L) and bosentan (10 µmol/L) suppressed Ang IIinduced contraction in SHR (2±3 versus 14±3 µm reduction in diameter; n=5). The bradykinin B2 receptor blocker HOE140 (0.1 µmol/L) did not significantly affect Ang IIinduced contraction in SHR (13±3 versus 15±4 µm reduction in diameter). In WKY rats, Ang IIinduced dilation was significantly reduced by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (4±2 versus 24±4 µm) and by HOE140 (6±3 versus 26±5 µm).
The stimulation of AT2R produced a concentration-dependent dilation in arteries isolated from WKY rats and a concentration-dependent contraction in arteries isolated from SHR (Figure 1C; n=8 per group).
Concentration-dependent stimulation of AT2R (Ang II 0.01 to 100 nmol/L) was repeated in arteries isolated from WKY rats and SHR submitted to various treatments. Maximal responses to AT2R stimulation and MAP determined in the different groups are shown in Figure 2.
|
There was no significant difference in MAP and AT2R-mediated dilation between control WKY rats (118±8 mm Hg; 24±3 µm diameter increase; n=8) and WKY rats treated with candesartan (108±9 mm Hg; 19±5 µm diameter increase; n=4).
In SHR, candesartan partly depressed MAP (146±8 mm Hg, n=4 versus 183±11 mm Hg, n=8; P<0.01 versus SHR and P<0.01 versus WKY rats) and tended to reduce AT2R-mediated contraction, although this did not reach significance (8±3 versus 3±2 µm diameter decrease).
In SHR, treatment with perindopril reduced MAP (n=4; 125±6 mm Hg; P<0.01), and AT2R stimulation induced a significant vasodilation (6±2 µm diameter increase) that was significantly lower than AT2-induced dilation in WKY rats.
In SHR treated with hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day; n=4), MAP decreased to a level that was still higher than in WKY rats (145±11 mm Hg; n=6; P<0.01 versus SHR and P<0.05 versus WKY rats), and stimulation of AT2R induced vasoconstriction (3±1 µm diameter decrease; n=6).
In SHR treated with a higher dose of hydralazine (24 mg/kg per day; n=4), MAP was reduced to a normal value (105±10 mm Hg; P=NS versus WKY rats), and AT2R induced a significant vasodilation (27±7 µm diameter increase; P=NS versus WKY rats).
In SHR treated with candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day), MAP was reduced to a normal level (n=4; 102±9 mm Hg; P=NS versus WKY rats), and AT2R induced a significant vasodilation (22±5 µm diameter increase; P=NS versus WKY rats).
Endothelium removal did not affect AT2R-dependent contraction in untreated SHR (12±3 µm with endothelium versus 14±3 µm contraction without endothelium; n=4). On the other hand, AT2R-dependent dilation was abolished by endothelium removal in both untreated WKY rats (24±4 versus 3±2 µm dilation; n=4) and SHR treated with candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day; 26±4 versus 4±2 µm increase in diameter; n=4).
Western Blot Analysis of AT2R
In resistance arteries isolated from untreated WKY (n=8) rats and untreated SHR (n=8), as well as from SHR treated with hydralazine alone (24 mg/kg per day; n=5) or hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day; n=5) combined with candesartan, AT2R expression was quantified. Western blot analysis showed that AT2R was significantly less expressed in SHR than in WKY rats (46%) in isolated mesenteric resistance arteries (Figure 3). Hydralazine (24 mg/kg per day) gradually raised AT2R expression in SHR treated for 18, 23, and 48 days. After 48 days, AT2R expression was significantly higher than in SHR, but it remained significantly lower than in WKY rats (70%; Figure 3). However, after 44 days of treatment, candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day) restored AT2R expression in SHR to a level equivalent to that found in WKY rats (96.7% versus 100%; Figure 3).
|
Immunohistology Analysis of AT2R
In WKY rats, immunofluorescence analysis of mesenteric resistance arteries, with the use of confocal microscopy, indicated that AT2R was present in the endothelium, in the smooth muscle, and in the adventitia. In the endothelium, AT2R immunofluorescence was lower in SHR than in WKY rats (5±3% of WKY; P=NS; n=6 per group). In the media a significant fluorescence could be detected, although it was lower than in WKY rats (32±6%; P<0.01; n=6). In SHR treated with candesartan plus hydralazine (16 mg/kg per day), immunofluorescence of AT2R was restored to a level equivalent to that found in WKY rats (compared with WKY rats: 88±11% in the endothelium and 81±18% in the media) (Figure 4).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent evidence suggests that AT2R stimulation causes vasodilation in small resistance arteries in normotensive rats.6,7,11,16,17,20,22 This vasodilation may play an important role in the regulation of arterial blood pressure by increasing the diameter of resistance arteries. Vasodilation induced by AT2R stimulation has been described in several vascular territories and is usually associated with NO production by endothelial cells and cGMP production by smooth muscle cells.23 In some but not all arteries investigated, bradykinin B2 receptor activation is involved in AT2R-dependent dilation.911,22 Importantly, AT2R-mediated dilation does not desensitize, in contrast to AT1R-dependent contraction, supporting the assumption that AT2R dilation might have a role in the treatment of hypertension.20,24 Furthermore, in agreement with previous studies,21,25 AT2R was found in resistance arteries by Western blot and RT-PCR analysis. With the use of immunofluorescence, AT2R was localized in endothelial and smooth muscle cells, as in previous studies in rat mesenteric arteries16 and skeletal muscle arterioles.26
We found that AT2R stimulation in SHR induced a vasoconstriction, in agreement with previous studies showing that in young hypertensive rats Ang IIinduced contraction was decreased by AT2R blockade.25 Interestingly, this effect involved stimulation of endothelin-1 and probably thromboxane A2. We found that AT2R expression was lower in SHR resistance arteries than in WKY rats. However, a decreased expression cannot readily explain a reversal of dilation into contraction. The mechanism of this reversal remains to be discovered but may involve a switch in signaling from constrictor to dilator mechanisms due to increased endothelial AT2R expression. Indeed, our immunohistological analysis of AT2R in mesenteric arteries from SHR showed undetectable AT2R labeling in the endothelium that was reestablished with antihypertensive treatment that normalized blood pressure. In addition, AT2R-dependent contraction in SHR is not affected by endothelium removal, whereas AT2R-dependent dilation is abolished in the absence of endothelium. Thus, the difference in the type of response might reflect a change in AT2R expression between the endothelium and the smooth muscle. Nevertheless, because of the small size of the resistance arteries, AT2R expression and mRNA level were not significantly decreased by endothelium removal in either SHR or WKY rats (D. Henrion, unpublished data). In addition, cultured endothelial cells rapidly lose AT2R phenotype, thus preventing a study of AT2R expression in cultured endothelial cells from WKY rats or SHR.
Stimulation of the NO-cGMP pathway by AT2R has been shown initially in aortic cells.27 In the dog coronary circulation, NO production by Ang II is activated through both AT1R and AT2R stimulation.28 Other evidence suggests that AT1R and AT2R may not always oppose each other, at least with regard to NO production.23 In the mesenteric circulation, we found that AT2R-dependent flow-mediated dilation requires NO production and that exogenous stimulation of AT2R in the same arteries produces dilation.16
In WKY rats, candesartan did not significantly change MAP, and AT2R-mediated dilation was preserved, as we have previously reported.20 By contrast, candesartan partly decreased MAP and AT2R-mediated vasoconstriction in SHR. Similarly, low-dose hydralazine, also partly reducing MAP, inhibited AT2R-mediated vasoconstriction. Obviously, these treatments were not able to normalize MAP and to restore AT2R vasodilator function. Indeed, it was only when MAP was sufficiently reduced in SHR that AT2R-mediated vasodilation was observed. First, with the use of an ACE inhibitor, MAP was decreased to a level similar to that observed in WKY rats. In this case, stimulation of AT2R induced vasodilation. A further decrease in MAP, with the use of a higher dose of hydralazine or candesartan plus hydralazine, was also associated with a vasodilator effect of AT2R stimulation.
Interestingly, the different groups studied allowed a correlation to be drawn between MAP and the type and amplitude of the response to AT2R stimulation (Figure 2). Thus, from high to low MAP, AT2R stimulation moved progressively from contraction to dilation. In addition, this effect was associated with a different AT2R expression. In SHR, AT2R expression was low in the wall of mesenteric arteries compared with WKY. After MAP reduction in SHR, AT2R expression was restored to the level of WKY rats. However, it is difficult to determine whether AT2R-mediated dilation is a cause or a consequence of the reduction in blood pressure. In the combined candesartan/hydralazine group of SHR, the time course for AT2R expression, assessed by Western blots, was in parallel with the restoration of maximal AT2R-mediated dilation and normotension, which may indicate a primary role for AT2R. On the other hand, equivalent reductions in MAP caused by hydralazine were associated with maximal AT2R-mediated dilation despite suppressed AT2R expression. These discrepancies in AT2R abundance between treatments may reflect distinct AT2R locations within the vasculature. Indeed, more precise immunohistological analysis demonstrated that AT2R expression was located in the endothelial and smooth muscle cells in WKY rats, whereas in SHR AT2R was not detectable in the endothelium. On the other hand, in SHR treated with candesartan plus hydralazine, MAP was restored, AT2R stimulation induced vasodilation, and AT2R expression was equivalent to that found in WKY rats. In this group, immunohistology of AT2R showed the presence of the receptor in both endothelia and smooth muscle cells. Thus, we can speculate that the presence or absence of AT2R on endothelial cells has a key role in determining the type of response, at least in part because the inhibition of the vasodilation in WKY rats by L-NAME does not uncover a vasoconstriction due to receptors located on the muscle, as revealed by immunohistology. We can also assume that MAP per se is the effector determining the type of response induced by AT2R stimulation (Figure 2C).
In conclusion, in resistance arteries of SHR, (1) AT2R is downregulated by hypertension, and (2) specific and nonspecific antihypertensive treatments restore AT2R expression and vasodilator functions. Whether or not this AT2R plasticity directly contributes to the blood pressure reduction, this AT2R dilator mechanism is likely to contribute to the maintenance of a vasodilator state during chronic treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Lee, S. Xia, and L. Ragolia Upregulation of AT2 receptor and iNOS impairs angiotensin II-induced contraction without endothelium influence in young normotensive diabetic rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): R144 - R154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pinaud, A. Bocquet, O. Dumont, K. Retailleau, C. Baufreton, R. Andriantsitohaina, L. Loufrani, and D. Henrion Paradoxical Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors in Resistance Arteries of Old Rats Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 96 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. You, L. Waeckel, T. G. Ebrahimian, O. Blanc-Brude, P. Foubert, V. Barateau, M. Duriez, S. LeRicousse-Roussanne, J. Vilar, E. Dejana, et al. Increase in Vascular Permeability and Vasodilation Are Critical for Proangiogenic Effects of Stem Cell Therapy Circulation, July 25, 2006; 114(4): 328 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Paul, A. Poyan Mehr, and R. Kreutz Physiology of local Renin-Angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 747 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhou, J. Pavel, M. Macova, Z.-X. Yu, H. Imboden, L. Ge, T. Nishioku, J. Dou, E. Delgiacco, and J. M. Saavedra AT1 Receptor Blockade Regulates the Local Angiotensin II System in Cerebral Microvessels From Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Stroke, May 1, 2006; 37(5): 1271 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Vincent, Y. W. Kwan, S. Lung Chan, C. Perrin-Sarrado, J. Atkinson, and J.-M. Chillon Constrictor and Dilator Effects of Angiotensin II on Cerebral Arterioles Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2691 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Heagerty Influence of Changes of Blood Pressure on Vascular Angiotensin II Receptor Subtype Expression Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): 956 - 957. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |