Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;111:1114-1120
Published online before print February 21, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157144.24888.7E
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
111/9/1114    most recent
01.CIR.0000157144.24888.7Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Losordo, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Losordo, D. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other myocardial biology
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes

(Circulation. 2005;111:1114-1120.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Heart Failure

Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Rapidly Recruited to Myocardium and Mediate Protective Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning via "Imported" Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity

Masaaki Ii, MD, PhD; Hiromi Nishimura, MD, PhD; Atsushi Iwakura, MD, PhD; Andrea Wecker, BS; Elizabeth Eaton, BS; Takayuki Asahara, MD, PhD; Douglas W. Losordo, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Research (M.I., A.I., A.W., E.E., D.W.L.), Caritas St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass, and Regenerative Medicine (H.N., T.A.), Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.

Correspondence to Douglas W. Losordo, MD, Caritas St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135. E-mail douglas.losordo{at}tufts.edu

Received September 7, 2004; revision received November 2, 2004; accepted November 10, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The function of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in repair of ischemic tissue has been the subject of intense scrutiny, and the capacity of these cells to contribute significantly to new blood vessels remains controversial. The possibility that EPCs could act as reservoirs of cytokines has been implied by several observations; however, a specific role for cytokine delivery has not been identified.

Methods and Results— We performed a series of experiments that revealed the rapid recruitment of EPCs to the myocardium by very short periods of ischemia, so-called ischemic preconditioning. The recruited EPCs express an array of potentially cardioprotective cytokines including nitric oxide synthase isoforms. Bone marrow transplantation studies, using donor marrow null for nitric oxide synthase isoforms, revealed that both endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase derived from bone marrow cells play essential roles in the cardioprotective effect that normally occurs after ischemic preconditioning.

Conclusions— These findings provide novel insights about the role of bone marrow–derived cells in ischemic preconditioning and also reveal that distinct mechanisms regulate recovery after ischemia-reperfusion and chronic ischemic injury.


Key Words: myocardial infarction • ischemia • nitric oxide synthase • blood cells


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The notion that repetitive transient sublethal interruption of the blood supply to the myocardium, resulting in ischemia, followed by restoration of the blood supply, or reperfusion (ischemia-reperfusion [I-R]), can have a protective effect against subsequent prolonged ischemia has been established by clinical observation and experimental studies over the past 2 decades.1–4 The myocardial protection that results from ischemic preconditioning (IP) is characterized by reduced infarct size, decreased incidence of fatal arrhythmias, and reduced postischemic contractile cardiac dysfunction.4–6 Multiple mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in IP,7–10 including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–mediated neovascularization during myocardial ischemia11–13 protein kinase C activation,2,4,13–16 and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity,17–19 among others.9,20

Angiogenesis has also been shown to play a central role in the recovery of the myocardium after ischemia and infarction.12,13 We and others have identified endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in adult human peripheral blood21,22 and have shown that EPCs accumulate in active angiogenic foci and participate in neovascularization after ischemic insults, a concept consistent with postnatal vasculogenesis.23–25 Moreover, studies have shown that augmentation of the supply of bone marrow–derived progenitor cells improves outcome after ischemic injury.26–28 Nevertheless, the actual contribution of EPC-derived vessel formation to improved outcome has been controversial,29 and there has been a suggestion that the extent of physiological benefit that results from augmentation of the EPC supply in sites of ischemia has been greater than the apparent anatomic contribution of these cells in the newly formed vasculature.

Accordingly, we performed a series of investigations to test the hypothesis that EPCs could exert a protective effect in the setting of myocardial ischemia via the rapid delivery of cytokines. We used the model of IP because this simple maneuver has been shown to have dramatic protective effects on myocardial preservation and has been associated with the expression of a number of potentially protective cytokines. Initial pilot studies revealed a strikingly rapid recruitment of EPCs after transient IP and relatively minor EPC-mediated neovascularization compared with the degree of cardioprotection.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Mice and Bone Marrow Transplantation Model
Male FVB/NJ or C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Me) aged 4 to 6 weeks were used as recipients for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Transgenic mice of FVB/N-TgN (Tie-2-LacZ) 182Sato, eNOS–/– mice (B6.129P2-Nos3tmlUnc), or iNOS–/– mice (B6.129P2-Nos2tmlLau; Jackson Laboratories) were used as donors for the BMT. All subsequent procedures were performed on BMT mice. St. Elizabeth’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved this research protocol, including all procedures and animal care.

The procedure of BMT was performed as described previously.23,24 Briefly, the background/recipient mice were lethally irradiated for bone marrow ablation with 9.0 Gy for FVB/NJ mice and 12.0 Gy for C57BL/6J mice; each received 1 half million donor bone marrow mononuclear cells. At 6 to 8 weeks after BMT, by which time the bone marrow of the recipient mice was reconstituted, all the procedures described below were performed. Hearts of BMT mice were harvested at the indicated time points after surgery for histology.

Surgical Procedure
The mouse model of myocardial ischemia was based on that described previously.5,7 Briefly, after induction of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation, a left thoracotomy was performed in the fourth intercostal space, followed by pericardiectomy. An 8-0 monofilament nylon suture was passed under the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) just proximal to the first diagonal branch. A 5-mm section of polyethylene suture was placed on top of the LAD to secure the ligation without damaging the artery. Both ends of the suture were passed through a segment of flared PE10 tubing to form a snare. IP was induced by pulling the snare and clamping tube with 4 cycles of 4 minutes of LAD occlusion and 4 minutes of reperfusion. I-R injury was induced with 45 minutes of LAD occlusion, and chronic ischemic injury was induced with permanent LAD ligation. Control mice underwent thoracotomy and pericardiectomy followed by the passing of a suture under the LAD without interruption of blood flow for 30 minutes as a sham operation for comparison with IP.

Immunohistochemistry
The hearts of BMT mice were harvested at predetermined times after surgery and prepared for frozen tissue sectioning. Double-fluorescent immunohistochemistry was performed with an antibody against ß-galactosidase (ß-gal) and endothelial NOS (eNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS), or VEGF. Nonspecific protein binding was blocked with 10% normal horse serum. Sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-ß-gal antibody (1:250, Cortex) at 4°C overnight, followed by Cy3-goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch) as a secondary antibody for 30 minutes. Goat polyclonal anti-eNOS, -iNOS and -VEGF antibodies (1:250, Santa Cruz) and Cy2-donky anti-goat IgG (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch) were used as a secondary primary and its secondary antibody, respectively. Normal rabbit or goat IgG served as negative controls. The endothelial cell–specific marker FITC-isolectin-B4 (1:100; Vector Laboratories) was used for capillary staining. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (1:5000, Sigma), and sections were mounted in aqueous mounting medium. Images were examined with a fluorescent microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE TE200).

EPC Culture Assay and Bone Marrow–Derived EPC Culture
EPC culture assay and bone marrow–derived EPC culture was performed as described previously.24,30 Briefly, mononuclear cells isolated from 500 µL of peripheral blood were cultured in 5% FBS/EBM-2 (Clonetics) medium with supplements (SingleQuot Kit; Clonetics) on rat vitronectin (Sigma) with 0.1% gelatin-coated 4-well glass chamber slides. After 4 days in culture, cells were coincubated with DiI-acLDL (Biomedical Technologies) for 1 hour, followed by FITC-BS-1 lectin staining. The dual-stained cells, considered EPCs, were counted in 10 randomly selected high-power fields under a fluorescent microscope. Bone marrow–derived mononuclear cells of isolated tibia and femur were plated on cell culture dishes coated with rat vitronectin at a density of 5x105/cm2 and cultured in 5% FBS/EBM-2 medium. After 4 days in culture, nonadherent cells were removed, and adherent cells were reseeded at a density of 5x104/cm2. After 3 days in further culture, the cells were used as EPC-rich cell population for Western blot analysis.

Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously.31 Briefly, cells cultured in EBM-2 medium with supplements under certain culture conditions were lysed in sample buffer in a 35-mm culture dish. Protein extracts were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (BioRad). The membranes were blocked with 10% nonfat dry milk, then immunoblotted overnight at 4°C with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against mouse eNOS (1:1000, BD Pharmingen), phospho-eNOS (1:1000, Cell Signaling), iNOS (1:1000, BD Pharmingen), and VEGF (1:500, Santa Cruz) and a goat polyclonal antibody against {alpha}-actin (1:1000, Santa Cruz). After 45 minutes in incubation with horseradish peroxidase–goat anti-rabbit IgG (1: 5000, Santa Cruz), immunoreactive bands were visualized with ECL reagent (Amersham). Densitometric analyses for the blots were performed with NIH Image software.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Significance (P<0.05) was determined by ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis with the Fisher procedure.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
EPCs Are Recruited to the Myocardium Immediately After IP Alone
To investigate EPC kinetics in peripheral blood and the myocardium after IP alone, we performed EPC culture assays and histological evaluations in Tie-2/LacZ BMT mice, which receive bone marrow from transgenic mice that constitutively express ß-gal regulated by the promoter of the endothelial gene, Tie-2.32,33 As shown in Figure 1a, the number of circulating EPCs decreased immediately after IP to a significantly greater extent than in a sham control group (n=6 at the indicated time points, respectively; 33.2±3.3 EPCs per high-power field [HPF] in cell culture assay at baseline, 21.5±1.9 EPCs/HPF in sham versus 11.7±1.3 EPCs/HPF in IP at 1 hour, P<0.01). Circulating EPC counts were then similar for the next few hours (sham=8.7±1.4 EPCs/HPF versus IP=8.3±0.8 EPCs/HPF at 3 hours, P=NS; sham=16.0±1.5 EPCs/HPF versus IP=19.8±2.7 EPCs/HPF at 6 hours, P=NS) and then increased significantly in the IP group, peaking at {approx}3 days (21.2±1.7 versus 33.7±3.5 EPCs/HPF at 18 hours, 32.0±3.3 versus 42.7±4.7 EPCs/HPF at 1 day, and 41.5±1.4 versus 59.1±1.6 EPCs/HPF at 3 days; P<0.01). By day 7, the levels in both groups had returned toward baseline levels, although they remained higher in the IP group (29.7±4.2 versus 37.8±2.4 EPCs/HPF, P<0.01). To assess the microvascular architecture, in situ fluorescent staining with the endothelial cell–specific marker FITC-conjugated BS1-lectin (Vector Laboratories) was performed with minor modification as described previously.24 Briefly, 10 minutes after systemic injection of BS1-lectin (0.1 mg per mouse), hearts were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 2 hours and prepared for frozen cross-sectioning. Immunofluorescent staining revealed that the early, precipitous decrease in circulating EPCs in the IP group coincided with rapid EPC recruitment to the jeopardized zone of the myocardium. As shown in Figure 1b, EPCs, identified by red fluorescence resulting from ß-gal immunoreactivity, appeared in the myocardium immediately, 1 and 3 hours after IP, and gradually diminished thereafter.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Modulation of EPC kinetics by IP. a, Circulating EPCs in peripheral blood were quantified by EPC culture assay 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 18 hours, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after sham or IP operation. Values are mean±SEM; n=5, respectively. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs sham. b, EPCs are rapidly recruited to jeopardized zone of myocardium after IP alone. Immunofluorescent staining for ß-gal to identify cells of bone marrow origin (red) and capillaries (green) in myocardium at indicated time points after IP. Times denote interval after induction of IP. Bar=100 µm.

These studies revealed that repetitive transient LAD occlusion and reperfusion induced dramatic recruitment of EPCs into the ischemic zone of the myocardium immediately after IP alone. This was accompanied by a biphasic modulation of EPC kinetics in the peripheral circulation, with a rapid decrease in circulating EPCs that coincided with the appearance of EPCs in the myocardium. Thus, EPC kinetics in peripheral blood and recruitment of EPCs in the myocardium suggested a dynamic equilibrium. Subsequently, the increased number of EPCs in the late phases after IP may have resulted from EPC mobilization by VEGF (or other cytokines) released by the ischemic myocardium (data not shown). Although a sham operation, including thoracotomy and pericardiectomy, can also affect EPC kinetics, this more modest response is thought to be due to the wound-healing process.23 The implication is that recruitment of bone marrow–derived cells to sites of injury, previously referred to under the rubric of "inflammation," may comprise a variety of responses, with some targeted directly to the mechanisms of tissue repair or vascular preservation. Indeed, most of the recruited cells in the myocardium immediately after IP were not inflammatory cells expressing markers of CD3 and CD13 (data not shown) but were Tie-2–expressing cells, consistent with EPCs.

IP Reduces Infarct Size and Preserves Capillary Density After I-R Injury
Next, we sought to document the extent of myocardial protection by IP, and its relationship to the recruitment of EPCs, by inducing myocardial infarction by prolonged ischemia followed by reperfusion (I-R) with or without preceding IP. Consistent with the pilot studies of IP alone, the number of ß-gal–expressing cells (indicating bone marrow origin and Tie-2 expression) in the peri-infarct area was significantly higher in the IP group than in the sham group (10.6±2.4 versus 43.0±4.9/mm2, P<0.01; Figure 2a). Also as expected, the extent of myocardial damage induced by I-R injury was decreased in the IP group (n=5) compared with the sham group (n=5) at 7 days. IP significantly reduced infarct size (2.4±0.2 mm2 in the sham group versus 1.0±0.2 mm2 in the IP group; 58% reduction, P<0.01; Figure 2b). Representative photographs of immunofluorescent staining with in situ perfusion of BS1-lectin (green) to identify capillaries in the ischemic area are shown in Figure 3a. Capillary density (in 3 random HPFs) in the ischemic area 3 days after I-R injury was significantly greater in the IP group than in the sham group, which suggests that IP had preserved the microvasculature (101.5±16.8/HPF versus 239.0±7.8/HPF, P<0.01; Figure 3b). The participation of EPCs, indicated by double staining of red (ß-gal, ie, bone marrow–derived Tie-2–expressing cells) and green (endothelium of any origin), also was observed in capillaries of the myocardium (Figure 3a). The extent of incorporated EPCs in the microvasculature of the ischemic area was also significantly higher in the IP group than in the sham group (25.5±2.1/HPF versus 58.3±5.2/HPF, P<0.01; Figure 3c). This indicates that bone marrow–derived cells had incorporated into the myocardial microvasculature in greater numbers when ischemia-induced injury was preceded by IP.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. IP enhances EPC incorporation into ischemic myocardium and reduces infarct size. a, Quantification of EPC number in peri-infarct area. b, Quantification of infarct area in sham group vs IP group. Values are mean±SEM; a, n=5 and b, n=4. *P<0.01 vs sham, respectively.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. IP preserves capillary density and enhances EPC incorporation into myocardial microvasculature. a, Representative immunofluorescent staining for ß-gal (red) and capillaries (green) in ischemic myocardium 3 days after sham versus IP, both followed by I-R injury. Arrows indicate double-positive cells (yellow) in merged images. Bar=50 µm. b, Quantitative analysis of capillary density in ischemic myocardium. c, Quantitative analysis of incorporated EPCs (double positive cells, yellow) into the myocardial microvasculature. Values are mean±SEM; b and c, n=3. *P<0.01 vs sham.

Incorporated EPCs Produce eNOS, iNOS, and VEGF in Ischemic Myocardium
Double fluorescent immunostaining in ischemic myocardium 3 days after surgery in the IP group revealed that the incorporated ß-gal–expressing EPCs (red) and some of the cardiomyocytes in ischemic myocardium expressed eNOS, iNOS, and VEGF (green; Figure 4a). Merged images reveal large numbers of double-positive cells expressing ß-gal (Tie-2–expressing cells of bone marrow origin) and eNOS, iNOS, and VEGF, respectively, which reveals that the EPCs were significant sources of cardioprotective factors.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Hypoxia/ischemia modulates eNOS, iNOS, and VEGF production in EPCs. a, Examples of double-immunofluorescent staining for ß-gal (red) and eNOS, iNOS, and VEGF (green) in ischemic myocardium 7 days after IP plus I-R injury. Arrows indicate double-positive cells (yellow). Dark area indicates borders of myocardial infarction. Bar=100 µm. Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of extracts from EPCs cultured in normoxic (Ctrl) or hypoxic condition for 4, 8, and 24 hours and in 24-hour hypoxic (Ctrl) or normoxic condition for 4, 8, and 24 hours after 24 hours in hypoxia (b, c, and d). Hatched bars indicate normoxic condition; open bars, hypoxic condition. b, Expression of eNOS and phospho-eNOS (p-eNOS). Phospho-eNOS expression was corrected for total eNOS expression and quantified as relative value to control (Ctrl). c, Expression of iNOS was corrected for {alpha}-actin as internal control and quantified as relative value vs control (Ctrl). d, Expression of VEGF was corrected for {alpha}-actin as internal control, and expression was quantified vs control (Ctrl). *P<0.05 and **P<0.0001 versus Pre (Ctrl: normoxia) and #P<0.05 and ##P<0.001 vs 24-hour Ctrl/hypoxia. Similar results were obtained from 3 independent experiments.

To clarify the regulation of EPC-produced cytokines in ischemic myocardium, we next performed an in vitro study using cultured EPCs under hypoxic conditions in an attempt to mimic myocardial ischemia. EPCs isolated from bone marrow were cultured under normoxic (95% air and 5% CO2) or hypoxic (<2% oxygen, 95% N2 and 5% CO2)34 conditions in a standard incubator at 37°C. Cells were then further exposed to either hypoxia or normoxia 24 hours after hypoxia for the indicated time. In Western blot analyses, EPC phospho-eNOS abundance was gradually and slightly reduced by persistent hypoxia (arbitrary units, 1.0 in normoxia versus 0.6±0.10 after 24 hours of hypoxia, P<0.05; Figure 4b), whereas expression of iNOS and, to a lesser extent, VEGF was significantly induced (iNOS, 0 in normoxia versus 0.2±0.02 at 8 hours and 1.3±0.15 at 24 hours in hypoxia, P<0.0001; VEGF, 1.0 in normoxia versus 1.4±0.12 at 8 hours and 1.4±0.17 at 24 hours in hypoxia, P<0.01; Figures 4c and 4d). In contrast, hypoxia-induced repression of eNOS expression was gradually reversed in normoxia (arbitrary units, 1.0 in 24 hours of hypoxia versus 1.5±0.09 after 8 hours and 1.8±0.06 after 24 hours in normoxia, P<0.001; Figure 4b). Similarly, the upregulation of iNOS and VEGF expression induced by hypoxia was significantly reversed by normoxia (iNOS, 1.0 in 24 hours of hypoxia versus 0.6±0.09, 0.3±0.06, and 0 after 4, 8, and 24 hours in normoxia, respectively, P<0.0001; VEGF, 1.0 in 24 hours of hypoxia versus 0.9±0.04 and 0.5±0.04 after 8 and 24 hours in normoxia, P<0.05 and <0.0001, respectively; Figures 4c and 4d). Although these data may not necessarily reflect changes in gene expression by EPCs in the myocardium, they do provide a starting point for our investigation of the potential mechanisms involved.

These findings show that EPC expression of the active form of eNOS, phospho-eNOS, appears to be diminished by hypoxia. Conversely, iNOS in EPCs is induced by hypoxia, as is endogenous VEGF.34 The upregulation of iNOS and VEGF is also reversed by normoxia. Hypoxia promotes EPC migration but inhibits EPC mitogenic activity in response to VEGF (data not shown).34

To integrate these results, EPCs recruited to the ischemic myocardium are stimulated by the local tissue environment and upregulate expression of NOS and VEGF. Sustained tissue hypoxia, which reflects chronic ischemic injury in vivo, not only promotes migration activity of EPCs but also further enhances EPC VEGF production and iNOS expression. On the other hand, transient tissue hypoxia, consistent with I-R injury in vivo, enhances phosphorylated eNOS production while diminishing VEGF and iNOS. These data suggest that eNOS or iNOS derived from EPCs may play a critical role in recovery from different types of tissue ischemia.

eNOS or iNOS Derived From EPCs Plays a Differential Role in the Effect of IP
These findings suggested that the regulation of different NOS isoforms was different during the time course of hypoxic stress. Thus, to clarify the importance of eNOS or iNOS derived from EPCs after IP, we compared myocardial infarction size with or without IP followed by I-R or chronic ischemic injury among wild-type mice that were recipients of BMT from wild-type, eNOS–/–, or iNOS–/– mice, which resulted in chimeric mice in which only bone marrow–derived cells were deficient in expression of 1 of the NOS isoforms, whereas the myocardium retained normal NOS expression. In the case of the I-R injury model, the lack of iNOS in recruited EPCs significantly reduced the beneficial effect of IP (% reduction of infarct size –35.9±3.4% in wild-type BMT versus –22.5±3.3% in iNOS BMT, P<0.05), and IP actually aggravated ischemic injury in eNOS–/– BMT mice (% reduction of infarct size –35.9±3.4% in wild-type BMT versus 19.8±6.3% in eNOS BMT, P<0.0001; Figure 5a). These findings imply that eNOS, delivered from bone marrow–derived cells, plays a critical role in myocardial protection in the setting of I-R injury. On the other hand, in the case of the chronic ischemic injury model, with permanent coronary artery occlusion, the lack of eNOS in recruited EPCs significantly reduced the benefit of IP (% reduction of infarct size –29.4±3.2% in wild-type BMT versus –16.0±3.8% in eNOS BMT, P<0.05), and IP strikingly aggravated ischemic injury in iNOS–/– BMT mice (% reduction of infarct size –29.4±3.2% in wild-type BMT versus 62.2±6.8% in iNOS BMT, P<0.0001; Figure 5b). These findings imply that iNOS activity, recruited rapidly to the myocardium via bone marrow–derived EPCs, plays a significant role in myocardial protection in the setting of permanent coronary ischemia.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Loss of bone marrow expression of NOS isoforms has diverging effects on protective effect of IP, depending on type of myocardial injury. a, In I-R injury, IP increases extent of myocardial injury in eNOS–/– BMT mice, whereas it has the expected, although slightly reduced, protective effect despite absence of iNOS in bone marrow. *P<0.0001, **P<0.01 vs wild-type (WT) BMT. b, In chronic ischemic injury model, in which coronary artery is permanently ligated, loss of iNOS expression on bone marrow results in reversal of protective effect of IP and actual worsening of infarct size. Loss of eNOS expression in this setting does not nullify protective effect of IP as it did in setting of I-R injury, although degree of protection is reduced compared with WT BMT mice. #P<0.05, ##P<0.0001 vs WT BMT. Values in a and b are mean±SEM.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
These data suggest a novel mechanism for the protective effect of IP: the rapid deployment of reservoirs of NOS delivered to the site of injury via EPCs. IP alone is shown to rapidly modulate circulating EPC kinetics in the peripheral blood in association with the accumulation of EPCs in jeopardized myocardium. The EPCs then play 2 major roles in minimizing myocardial injury after prolonged, severe ischemia. EPCs directly preserve the microcirculation in ischemic myocardium via incorporation into vascular structures, consistent with prior data indicating this role for EPCs in ischemic tissue protection and recovery.35 The unexpected and perhaps more significant finding of these studies, however, is that EPCs recruited to the threatened myocardium play a unique role as repositories of NOS activities ie, eNOS and iNOS, as well as VEGF. Most striking, however, is the fact that the different NOS isoforms have different, perhaps contrasting effects depending on the type of ischemic insult. These activities of EPCs combine to help preserve the preexisting microcirculation indirectly and perhaps to thereby protect cardiomyocytes from ischemia-induced apoptosis and death.

The incorporation of EPCs in ischemic tissue has been shown to contribute to the recovery of ischemia through participation in neovascularization, both in animal studies and in promising early clinical trials.23,36 However, the other roles of EPCs in ischemic myocardium are not well understood, and controversy remains.29 In the present study, we demonstrate another role of EPCs as a favorable donor of NOS activity after IP. The mechanisms of the extremely rapid recruitment of EPCs and the strikingly different role for isoforms of NOS in different types of myocardial ischemia remain unsolved puzzles; however, the role of EPC-delivered NOS in myocardial protection is clear.

Recently, many investigators have documented the role of eNOS10,37 or iNOS18,38,39 in the cardioprotective effect of IP. Our data suggest that in the case of I-R injury after IP, activated eNOS produced from recruited EPCs plays an essential role in cardioprotection. A previous study reported that eNOS is not essential for the effect of IP37; however, this discrepancy can be explained by the use of a different experimental model, specifically an ex vivo isolated heart in a Langendorff perfusion system, thereby obviating the possibility of observing the in vivo phenomena induced by EPCs. Moreover, to the extent that we examined the expression of eNOS in the myocardium immunohistochemically, there was little activity noted in capillaries except for the endothelium in epicardial coronary arteries (data not shown). The major source of eNOS appeared to be bone marrow–derived EPCs. On the other hand, iNOS produced from recruited EPCs appears to play a crucial role in cardioprotection compared with eNOS in the setting of chronic ischemic injury after IP. Previous studies have documented a favorable role of iNOS in IP.18,38,39 In particular, Wang et al40 reported that IP upregulated iNOS in cardiomyocytes and played a protective role against myocardial damage. These authors showed iNOS mRNA expression in ischemic myocardium followed IP, and diffuse iNOS signals were detected with in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in the cytoplasmic space of cardiomyocytes. These reports and recent reviews of NOS signaling in IP19,41 are consistent with the present data; however, previous investigators did not consider the association between eNOS or iNOS and IP from the perspective of EPC contribution. These data are also consistent, from a more general perspective, with the concept put forth by Vasa et al42 that EPC phenotype is a clinically relevant factor in determining cardiovascular outcomes.

The present study demonstrates the first evidence that EPCs can contribute to a favorable effect of IP, acting as eNOS, iNOS, and VEGF donors in ischemic myocardium. Furthermore, we also show the differential roles of eNOS and iNOS derived from recruited EPCs in I-R or chronic ischemic injury after IP. These data provide novel insights in this field in terms of understanding the mechanisms of IP and provide clues to possible therapeutic approaches to enhance myocardial protection in the setting of ischemic injury.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by NIH grants (HL-53354, HL-60911, HL-63414, HL-63695, and HL-66957). We thank Mickey Neely and Deirdre Costello for secretarial assistance, Hong Ma and Marianne Kearney for expert histological assistance, and Hiromi Nishimura for helpful discussions.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986; 74: 1124–1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Bugge E, Ytrehus K. Ischaemic preconditioning is protein kinase C dependent but not through stimulation of alpha adrenergic or adenosine receptors in the isolated rat heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1995; 29: 401–406.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Ottani F, Galvani M, Ferrini D, Sorbello F, Limonetti P, Pantoli D, Rusticali F. Prodromal angina limits infarct size: a role for ischemic preconditioning. Circulation. 1995; 91: 291–297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Kitakaze M, Node K, Minamino T, Komamura K, Funaya H, Shinozaki Y, Chujo M, Mori H, Inoue M, Hori M, Kamada T. Role of activation of protein kinase C in the infarct size–limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning through activation of ecto-5'-nucleotidase. Circulation. 1996; 93: 781–791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Miller DL, Van Winkle DM. Ischemic preconditioning limits infarct size following regional ischemia-reperfusion in in situ mouse hearts. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 42: 680–684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Noda T, Minatoguchi S, Fujii K, Hori M, Ito T, Kanmatsuse K, Matsuzaki M, Miura T, Nonogi H, Tada M, Tanaka M, Fujiwara H. Evidence for the delayed effect in human ischemic preconditioning: prospective multicenter study for preconditioning in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1966–1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Guo Y, Wu WJ, Qiu Y, Tang XL, Yang Z, Bolli R. Demonstration of an early and a late phase of ischemic preconditioning in mice. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: H1375–H1387.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Bolli R. The late phase of preconditioning. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 972–983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Dawn B, Takano H, Tang XL, Kodani E, Banerjee S, Rezazadeh A, Qiu Y, Bolli R. Role of Src protein tyrosine kinases in late preconditioning against myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 283: H549–H556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Laude K, Favre J, Thuillez C, Richard V. NO produced by endothelial NO synthase is a mediator of delayed preconditioning–induced endothelial protection. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H2053–H2060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Banai S, Shweiki D, Pinson A, Chandra M, Lazarovici G, Keshet E. Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression induced by myocardial ischemia: implications for coronary angiogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 1994; 28: 1176–1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Hashimoto E, Ogita T, Nakaoka T, Matsuoka R, Takao A, Kira Y. Rapid induction of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by transient ischemia in rat heart. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: H1948–H1954.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Kawata H, Yoshida K, Kawamoto A, Kurioka H, Takase E, Sasaki Y, Hatanaka K, Kobayashi M, Ueyama T, Hashimoto T, Dohi K. Ischemic preconditioning upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA expression and neovascularization via nuclear translocation of protein kinase C epsilon in the rat ischemic myocardium. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 696–704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Miura T, Kawamura S, Goto M, Sakamoto J, Tsuchida A, Matsuzaki M, Shimamoto K. Effect of protein kinase C inhibitors on cardioprotection by ischemic preconditioning depends on the number of preconditioning episodes. Cardiovasc Res. 1998; 37: 700–709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Qiu Y, Ping P, Tang XL, Manchikalapudi S, Rizvi A, Zhang J, Takano H, Wu WJ, Teschner S, Bolli R. Direct evidence that protein kinase C plays an essential role in the development of late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits and that epsilon is the isoform involved. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 2182–2198.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Zhao J, Renner O, Wightman L, Sugden PH, Stewart L, Miller AD, Latchman DS, Marber MS. The expression of constitutively active isotypes of protein kinase C to investigate preconditioning. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 23072–23079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Bolli R, Bhatti ZA, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Zhang Q, Guo Y, Jadoon AK. Evidence that late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits is triggered by the generation of nitric oxide. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 42–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Zhao T, Xi L, Chelliah J, Levasseur JE, Kukreja RC. Inducible nitric oxide synthase mediates delayed myocardial protection induced by activation of adenosine A(1) receptors: evidence from gene-knockout mice. Circulation. 2000; 102: 902–907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Dawn B, Bolli R. Role of nitric oxide in myocardial preconditioning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002; 962: 18–41.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Bolli R, Shinmura K, Tang XL, Kodani E, Xuan YT, Guo Y, Dawn B. Discovery of a new function of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: COX-2 is a cardioprotective protein that alleviates ischemia/reperfusion injury and mediates the late phase of preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 55: 506–519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH-D, Wijelath ES, Yu C, Ishida A, Fujita Y, Kothari S, Mohle R, Sauvage LR, Moore MAS, Storb RF, Hammond WP. Evidence for circulating bone marrow–derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998; 92: 362–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Asahara T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, Kalka C, Chen D, Iwaguro H, Inai Y, Silver M, Isner JM. VEGF contributes to postnatal neovascularization by mobilizing bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3964–3972.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka-Moll WM, Silver M, Kearney M, Li T, Isner JM, Asahara T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 3422–3427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ, Takuma S, Burkhoff D, Wang J, Homma S, Edwards NM, Itescu S. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow–derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 430–436.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, Yamaguchi JI, Uchida S, Masuda H, Silver M, Ma H, Kearney M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 634–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Balsam LB, Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Kofidis T, Weissman IL, Robbins RC. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004; 428: 668–673.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Mallat Z, Silvestre JS, Le Ricousse-Roussanne S, Lecomte-Raclet L, Corbaz A, Clergue M, Duriez M, Barateau V, Akira S, Tedgui A, Tobelem G, Chvatchko Y, Levy BI. Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 binding protein signaling modulates ischemia-induced neovascularization in mice hindlimb. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 441–448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Schratzberger P, Schratzberger G, Silver M, Curry C, Kearney M, Magner M, Alroy J, Adelman LS, Weinberg DH, Ropper AH, Isner JM. Favorable effect of VEGF gene transfer on ischemic peripheral neuropathy. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 405–413.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Sato TN, Qin Y, Kozak CA, Audus KL. Tie-1 and tie-2 define another class of putative receptor tyrosine kinase genes expressed in early embryonic vascular system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90: 9355–9358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Sato TN, Tozawa Y, Deutsch U, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Fujiwara Y, Gentron-Maguire M, Gridley T, Wolburg H, Risau W, Qin Y. Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature. 1995; 376: 70–74.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Akita T, Murohara T, Ikeda H, Sasaki K, Shimada T, Egami K, Imaizumi T. Hypoxic preconditioning augments efficacy of human endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Lab Invest. 2003; 83: 65–73.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, Grunwald F, Aicher A, Urbich C, Martin H, Hoelzer D, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI). Circulation. 2002; 106: 3009–3017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Bell RM, Yellon DM. The contribution of endothelial nitric oxide synthase to early ischaemic preconditioning: the lowering of the preconditioning threshold: an investigation in eNOS knockout mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 52: 274–280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Kanno S, Lee PC, Zhang Y, Ho C, Griffith BP, Shears LL II, Billiar TR. Attenuation of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by superinduction of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2742–2748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Zingarelli B, Hake PW, Yang Z, O’Connor M, Denenberg A, Wong HR. Absence of inducible nitric oxide synthase modulates early reperfusion-induced NF-kappaB and AP-1 activation and enhances myocardial damage. FASEB J. 2002; 16: 327–342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhang SX, Wu WJ, Wang J, Bao W, Bolli R. Ischemic preconditioning upregulates inducible nitric oxide synthase in cardiac myocyte. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 5–15.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Bolli R. Cardioprotective function of inducible nitric oxide synthase and role of nitric oxide in myocardial ischemia and preconditioning: an overview of a decade of research. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001; 33: 1897–1918.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Aicher A, Adler K, Urbich C, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Number and migratory activity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells inversely correlate with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2001; 89: E1–E7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. Lucchinetti, S. M. Zeisberger, I. Baruscotti, J. Wacker, J. Feng, K. Zaugg, R. Dubey, A. H. Zisch, and M. Zaugg
Stem Cell-Like Human Endothelial Progenitors Show Enhanced Colony-Forming Capacity After Brief Sevoflurane Exposure: Preconditioning of Angiogenic Cells by Volatile Anesthetics
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1117 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Kamota, T.-S. Li, N. Morikage, M. Murakami, M. Ohshima, M. Kubo, T. Kobayashi, A. Mikamo, Y. Ikeda, M. Matsuzaki, et al.
Ischemic pre-conditioning enhances the mobilization and recruitment of bone marrow stem cells to protect against ischemia/reperfusion injury in the late phase.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 12, 2009; 53(19): 1814 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. M. Leone, M. Valgimigli, M. B. Giannico, V. Zaccone, M. Perfetti, D. D'Amario, A. G. Rebuzzi, and F. Crea
From bone marrow to the arterial wall: the ongoing tale of endothelial progenitor cells
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 890 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
P. Krishnamurthy, J. Rajasingh, E. Lambers, G. Qin, D. W. Losordo, and R. Kishore
IL-10 Inhibits Inflammation and Attenuates Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction via Activation of STAT3 and Suppression of HuR
Circ. Res., January 30, 2009; 104(2): e9 - e18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Xu, P. Czerwinski, M. Hortmann, H.-Y. Sohn, U. Forstermann, and H. Li
Protein kinase C {alpha} promotes angiogenic activity of human endothelial cells via induction of vascular endothelial growth factor
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 349 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Jelic, M. Padeletti, S. M. Kawut, C. Higgins, S. M. Canfield, D. Onat, P. C. Colombo, R. C. Basner, P. Factor, and T. H. LeJemtel
Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Repair Capacity of the Vascular Endothelium in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Circulation, April 29, 2008; 117(17): 2270 - 2278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Ryzhov, N. V. Solenkova, A. E. Goldstein, M. Lamparter, T. Fleenor, P. P. Young, J. P. Greelish, J. G. Byrne, D. E. Vaughan, I. Biaggioni, et al.
Adenosine Receptor-Mediated Adhesion of Endothelial Progenitors to Cardiac Microvascular Endothelial Cells
Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 356 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
H.-J. Cho, N. Lee, J. Y. Lee, Y. J. Choi, M. Ii, A. Wecker, J.-O. Jeong, C. Curry, G. Qin, and Y.-s. Yoon
Role of host tissues for sustained humoral effects after endothelial progenitor cell transplantation into the ischemic heart
J. Exp. Med., December 24, 2007; 204(13): 3257 - 3269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. A. Sorrentino, F. H. Bahlmann, C. Besler, M. Muller, S. Schulz, N. Kirchhoff, C. Doerries, T. Horvath, A. Limbourg, F. Limbourg, et al.
Oxidant Stress Impairs In Vivo Reendothelialization Capacity of Endothelial Progenitor Cells From Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Restoration by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist Rosiglitazone
Circulation, July 10, 2007; 116(2): 163 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Goukassian, G. Qin, C. Dolan, T. Murayama, M. Silver, C. Curry, E. Eaton, C. Luedemann, H. Ma, T. Asahara, et al.
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Receptor p75 Is Required in Ischemia-Induced Neovascularization
Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 752 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Hamada, M. K. Kim, A. Iwakura, M. Ii, T. Thorne, G. Qin, J. Asai, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Sekiguchi, M. Silver, et al.
Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} Mediate Contribution of Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Functional Recovery After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 21, 2006; 114(21): 2261 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Kubal, K. Sheth, B. Nadal-Ginard, and M. Galinanes
Bone marrow cells have a potent anti-ischemic effect against myocardial cell death in humans.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1112 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. You, L. Waeckel, T. G. Ebrahimian, O. Blanc-Brude, P. Foubert, V. Barateau, M. Duriez, S. LeRicousse-Roussanne, J. Vilar, E. Dejana, et al.
Increase in Vascular Permeability and Vasodilation Are Critical for Proangiogenic Effects of Stem Cell Therapy
Circulation, July 25, 2006; 114(4): 328 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
B. Li, E. E. Sharpe, A. B. Maupin, A. A. Teleron, A. L. Pyle, P. Carmeliet, and P. P. Young
VEGF and PlGF promote adult vasculogenesis by enhancing EPC recruitment and vessel formation at the site of tumor neovascularization
FASEB J, July 1, 2006; 20(9): 1495 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
D. Patschan, K. Krupincza, S. Patschan, Z. Zhang, C. Hamby, and M. S. Goligorsky
Dynamics of mobilization and homing of endothelial progenitor cells after acute renal ischemia: modulation by ischemic preconditioning
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): F176 - F185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Uemura, M. Xu, N. Ahmad, and M. Ashraf
Bone Marrow Stem Cells Prevent Left Ventricular Remodeling of Ischemic Heart Through Paracrine Signaling
Circ. Res., June 9, 2006; 98(11): 1414 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. Ii, H. Takenaka, J. Asai, K. Ibusuki, Y. Mizukami, K. Maruyama, Y.-s. Yoon, A. Wecker, C. Luedemann, E. Eaton, et al.
Endothelial Progenitor Thrombospondin-1 Mediates Diabetes-Induced Delay in Reendothelialization Following Arterial Injury
Circ. Res., March 17, 2006; 98(5): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. G.P. Welt and D. W. Losordo
Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Curb Your Enthusiasm?
Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): 1272 - 1274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
U. Mayr, Y. Zou, Z. Zhang, H. Dietrich, Y. Hu, and Q. Xu
Accelerated Arteriosclerosis of Vein Grafts in Inducible NO Synthase-/- Mice Is Related to Decreased Endothelial Progenitor Cell Repair
Circ. Res., February 17, 2006; 98(3): 412 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
111/9/1114    most recent
01.CIR.0000157144.24888.7Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Losordo, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Losordo, D. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other myocardial biology
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes