Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:IV-143-IV-145
Published online before print November 28, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166568
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/24_suppl/IV-143    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166568v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines

(Circulation. 2005;112:IV-143 – IV-145.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

Part 10.6: Anaphylaxis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowPathophysiology
down arrowEtiology
down arrowSigns and Symptoms
down arrowDifferential Diagnoses
down arrowInterventions to Prevent...
down arrowAirway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Anaphylaxis is a severe, systemic allergic reaction characterized by multisystem involvement, including the skin, airway, vascular system, and gastrointestinal tract. Severe cases may result in complete obstruction of the airway, cardiovascular collapse, and death. The term classic anaphylaxis refers to hypersensitivity reactions mediated by the subclass of antibodies immunoglobulins IgE and IgG. Prior sensitization to an allergen has occurred, producing antigen-specific immunoglobulins. Subsequent reexposure to the allergen provokes the anaphylactic reaction. Many anaphylactic reactions, however, occur without a documented prior exposure.

Anaphylactoid or pseudoanaphylactic reactions display a similar clinical syndrome, but they are not immune-mediated. Treatment for the two conditions is similar.


*    Pathophysiology
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Pathophysiology
down arrowEtiology
down arrowSigns and Symptoms
down arrowDifferential Diagnoses
down arrowInterventions to Prevent...
down arrowAirway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
The inciting allergen binds to antigen-specific IgE that has accumulated on previously sensitized basophils and mast cells. These cells almost immediately release a series of mediators, including histamines, leukotrienes, prostaglandins, thromboxanes, and bradykinins. When released locally and systemically, these mediators cause increased mucous membrane secretions, increased capillary permeability and leak, and markedly reduced smooth muscle tone in blood vessels (vasodilation) and bronchioles.


*    Etiology
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
*Etiology
down arrowSigns and Symptoms
down arrowDifferential Diagnoses
down arrowInterventions to Prevent...
down arrowAirway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Any antigen capable of activating IgE can be a trigger for anaphylaxis. In terms of etiology, researchers generally list the following categories of causes: pharmacologic agents, latex, stinging insects, and foods. In up to 5% of cases the antigenic agent cannot be identified.

Pharmacologic agents. Antibiotics (especially parenteral penicillins and other ß-lactams), aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and intravenous (IV) contrast agents are the most frequent medications associated with life-threatening anaphylaxis.
Latex. Much attention has focused on latex-induced anaphylaxis, but it is actually quite rare.1,2 A decade-long registry of anaphylactic deaths in England has not registered any latex-associated deaths.3,4
Stinging insects. Fatal anaphylaxis has long been associated with stings from hymenoptera (membrane-winged insects), including ants, bees, hornets, wasps, and yellow jackets. Fatal anaphylaxis can develop when a person with IgE antibodies induced by a previous sting is stung again. A fatal reaction occurs within 10 to 15 minutes. Cardiovascular collapse is the most common mechanism.3–5
Foods. Peanuts, tree-grown nuts, seafood, and wheat are the foods most frequently associated with life-threatening anaphylaxis.6 Bronchospasm and asphyxia are the most frequent mechanisms.3–5


*    Signs and Symptoms
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
*Signs and Symptoms
down arrowDifferential Diagnoses
down arrowInterventions to Prevent...
down arrowAirway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Consider anaphylaxis when responses from 2 or more body systems (cutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular, neurologic, or gastrointestinal) are noted; the cardiovascular and respiratory systems may not be involved. The shorter the interval between exposure and reaction, the more likely the reaction is to be severe. Signs and symptoms include the following:


*    Differential Diagnoses
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
up arrowSigns and Symptoms
*Differential Diagnoses
down arrowInterventions to Prevent...
down arrowAirway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
A number of disease processes produce some of the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. Only after the clinician eliminates anaphylaxis as a diagnosis should the other conditions be considered, because failure to identify and appropriately treat anaphylaxis can be fatal.7,8


*    Interventions to Prevent Cardiopulmonary Arrest
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
up arrowSigns and Symptoms
up arrowDifferential Diagnoses
*Interventions to Prevent...
down arrowAirway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Recommendations to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest are difficult to standardize because etiology, clinical presentation (including severity and course), and organ involvement vary widely. Few randomized trials of treatment approaches have been reported. Providers, however, must be aware that the patient can deteriorate quickly and that urgent support of airway, breathing, and circulation are essential. The following therapies are commonly used and widely accepted but are based more on consensus than evidence:

–Absorption and subsequent achievement of maximum plasma concentration after subcutaneous administration is slower and may be significantly delayed with shock.10,11 Thus, intramuscular (IM) administration is favored.

–Administer IV epinephrine if anaphylaxis appears to be severe with immediate life-threatening manifestations.12

   –Close monitoring is critical because fatal overdose of epinephrine has been reported.3,14

   –Patients who are taking ß-blockers have increased incidence and severity of anaphylaxis and can develop a paradoxical response to epinephrine.15 Consider glucagon as well as ipratropium for these patients (see below).

Aggressive fluid resuscitation. Give isotonic crystalloid (eg, normal saline) if hypotension is present and does not respond rapidly to epinephrine. A rapid infusion of 1 to 2 L or even 4 L may be needed initially.
Antihistamines. Administer antihistamines slowly IV or IM (eg, 25 to 50 mg of diphenhydramine).
H2 blockers. Administer H2 blockers such as cimetidine (300 mg orally, IM, or IV).16
Inhaled ß-adrenergic agents. Provide inhaled albuterol if bronchospasm is a major feature. Inhaled ipratropium may be especially useful for treatment of bronchospasm in patients receiving ß-blockers. Note that some patients treated for near-fatal asthma actually had anaphylaxis, so they received repeated doses of conventional bronchodilators rather than epinephrine.17
Corticosteroids. Infuse high-dose IV corticosteroids early in the course of therapy. Beneficial effects are delayed at least 4 to 6 hours.
Removal of venom sac. Insect envenomation by bees (but not wasps) may leave a venom sac attached to the victim’s skin. At some point during initial assessment, look at the sting site, and if you see a stinger, immediately scrape it or any insect parts at the site of the sting, using the dull edge of a knife.18 Avoid compressing or squeezing any insect parts near the skin because squeezing may increase envenomation.

Potential Therapies

Observation
Patients who respond to therapy require observation, but there is no evidence to suggest the length of observation time needed. Symptoms may recur in some patients (up to 20%) within 1 to 8 hours (biphasic response) despite an intervening asymptomatic period. Biphasic responses have been reported to occur up to 36 hours after the initial reaction.15,16,21–24 A patient who remains symptom-free for 4 hours after treatment may be discharged.25 Severity of reaction or other problems, however, may necessitate longer periods of observation.


*    Airway Obstruction
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
up arrowSigns and Symptoms
up arrowDifferential Diagnoses
up arrowInterventions to Prevent...
*Airway Obstruction
down arrowCardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Early elective intubation is recommended for patients observed to develop hoarseness, lingual edema, stridor, or oropharyngeal swelling. Patients with angioedema pose a particularly worrisome problem because they are at high risk for rapid deterioration. Most will present with some degree of labial or facial swelling. Patients with hoarseness, lingual edema, and oropharyngeal swelling are at particular risk for respiratory compromise.

Patients can deteriorate over a brief period of time (1/2 to 3 hours), with progressive development of stridor, dysphonia or aphonia, laryngeal edema, massive lingual swelling, facial and neck swelling, and hypoxemia. This may occur when patients have a delayed presentation to the hospital or fail to respond to therapy.

At this point use of either the laryngeal mask airway or the Combitube will be ineffective, and endotracheal intubation and cricothyrotomy may be difficult or impossible. Attempts at endotracheal intubation may only further increase laryngeal edema or cause trauma to the airway. Early recognition of the potentially difficult airway allows planning for alternative airway management by those who are trained in these techniques, including consultation with anesthesia and an ear, nose, and throat specialist if the provider is unfamiliar with advanced airway techniques.


*    Cardiac Arrest
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
up arrowSigns and Symptoms
up arrowDifferential Diagnoses
up arrowInterventions to Prevent...
up arrowAirway Obstruction
*Cardiac Arrest
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
If cardiac arrest develops, CPR, volume administration, and adrenergic drugs are the cornerstones of therapy. Critical therapies are as follows:


*    Summary
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
up arrowSigns and Symptoms
up arrowDifferential Diagnoses
up arrowInterventions to Prevent...
up arrowAirway Obstruction
up arrowCardiac Arrest
*Summary
down arrowReferences
 
The management of anaphylaxis includes early recognition, anticipation of deterioration, and aggressive support of airway, oxygenation, ventilation, and circulation. Potential fatal complications include airway obstruction and cardiovascular collapse. Prompt, aggressive therapy may succeed even if cardiac arrest develops.


*    Footnotes
 
This special supplement to Circulation is freely available at http://www.circulationaha.org


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPathophysiology
up arrowEtiology
up arrowSigns and Symptoms
up arrowDifferential Diagnoses
up arrowInterventions to Prevent...
up arrowAirway Obstruction
up arrowCardiac Arrest
up arrowSummary
*References
 
1. Dreyfus DH, Fraser B, Randolph CC. Anaphylaxis to latex in patients without identified risk factors for latex allergy. Conn Med. 2004; 68: 217–222.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Ownby DR. A history of latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002; 110: S27–S32.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Pumphrey RS. Lessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000; 30: 1144–1150.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Pumphrey RS. Fatal anaphylaxis in the UK, 1992–2001. Novartis Found Symp. 2004; 257: 116–128;discussion 128–132, 157–160, 276–185.

5. Pumphrey RS, Roberts IS. Postmortem findings after fatal anaphylactic reactions. J Clin Pathol. 2000; 53: 273–276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Mullins RJ. Anaphylaxis: risk factors for recurrence. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003; 33: 1033–1040.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Brown AF. Anaphylaxis: quintessence, quarrels, and quandaries. Emerg Med J. 2001; 18: 328.

8. Brown AFT. Anaphylaxis gets the adrenaline going. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21: 128–129.[Free Full Text]

9. Ishoo E, Shah UK, Grillone GA, Stram JR, Fuleiham NS. Predicting airway risk in angioedema: staging system based on presentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 121: 263–268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Simons FE, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine absorption in adults: intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 108: 871–873.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Simons FE, Chan ES, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine for the out-of-hospital (first-aid) treatment of anaphylaxis in infants: is the ampule/syringe/needle method practical? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 108: 1040–1044.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Brown SG, Blackman KE, Stenlake V, Heddle RJ. Insect sting anaphylaxis; prospective evaluation of treatment with intravenous adrenaline and volume resuscitation. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21: 149–154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Barach EM, Nowak RM, Lee TG, Tomlanovich MM. Epinephrine for treatment of anaphylactic shock. JAMA. 1984; 251: 2118–2122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Pumphrey R. Anaphylaxis: can we tell who is at risk of a fatal reaction? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 4: 285–290.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Ellis AK, Day JH. Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. CMAJ. 2003; 169: 307–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Winbery SL, Lieberman PL. Histamine and antihistamines in anaphylaxis. Clin Allergy Immunol. 2002; 17: 287–317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Rainbow J, Browne GJ. Fatal asthma or anaphylaxis? Emerg Med J. 2002; 19: 415–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Visscher PK, Vetter RS, Camazine S. Removing bee stings. Lancet. 1996; 348: 301–302.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Kill C, Wranze E, Wulf H. Successful treatment of severe anaphylactic shock with vasopressin: two case reports. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2004; 134: 260–261.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Williams SR, Denault AY, Pellerin M, Martineau R. Vasopressin for treatment of shock following aprotinin administration. Can J Anaesth. 2004; 51: 169–172.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Yocum MW, Butterfield JH, Klein JS, Volcheck GW, Schroeder DR, Silverstein MD. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Olmsted County: a population-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104 (pt 1): 452–456.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Smith PL, Kagey-Sobotka A, Bleecker ER, Traystman R, Kaplan AP, Gralnick H, Valentine MD, Permutt S, Lichtenstein LM. Physiologic manifestations of human anaphylaxis. J Clin Invest. 1980; 66: 1072–1080.

23. Stark BJ, Sullivan TJ. Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986; 78: 76–83.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Brazil E, MacNamara AF. ‘Not so immediate‘ hypersensitivity: the danger of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998; 15: 252–253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Brady WJ Jr, Luber S, Carter CT, Guertter A, Lindbeck G. Multiphasic anaphylaxis: an uncommon event in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1997; 4: 193–197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/24_suppl/IV-143    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166568v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines