| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;112:482-488.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cardiovascular Surgery |
From Thoraxcenter (C.v.d.L., F.J.t.C., M.L.G., C.P., E.B., W.B.V., P.W.S.), Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (L.A.v.H.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Albert Schweitzer Hospital (M.J.K.), Department of Cardiology, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to Dr Folkert J. ten Cate, Thoraxcenter, Room Ba 302, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail f.j.tencate{at}erasmusmc.nl
Received September 27, 2004; revision received March 14, 2005; accepted March 23, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Twenty-nine patients (aged 44±12 years) underwent myectomy with MLE, and 43 patients (aged 52±17 years) underwent PTSMA. Mitral leaflet area was similar in both groups (16.7±3.4 versus 15.9±2.7 cm2, respectively). After PTSMA, 2 patients died, 4 needed a reintervention, and 4 required a permanent pacemaker for complete heart block. After surgery, only 1 patient needed a reintervention. At 1-year follow-up, LVOT gradients did not differ between surgical and PTSMA patients (17±14 versus 23±19 mm Hg, respectively). Preinterventional mitral regurgitation grade was more severe in the surgical group, but with myectomy combined with MLE, the residual grade was similar to that of PTSMA. Mean SAM grade decreased significantly more after surgery (from 2.9±0.3 to 0.5±0.7 mm Hg versus from 2.8±0.5 to 1.3±0.9 mm Hg, P<0.05).
Conclusions PTSMA in these selected patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy had more periprocedural complications and resulted in more reinterventions. Hemodynamic results (SAM grade and reduction in mitral regurgitation) were better in surgical patients.
Key Words: hypertrophy cardiomyopathy ablation ablation, septal alcohol
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 450
The mitral valve apparatus frequently demonstrates anomalies in HOCM (for instance, increased mitral leaflet area, length, and laxity, as well as anterior displacement of the papillary muscles1215). All of these abnormalities may predispose to residual systolic anterior motion (SAM) after successful myectomy. To avoid persistence of LVOT gradient and mitral regurgitation (MR), we developed the technique of mitral leaflet extension (MLE) in addition to myectomy.16 Previously, we reported beneficial effects of this novel technique compared with standard myectomy.16 Currently, it is not known whether PTSMA is equally effective in these selected patients. Here, we present hemodynamic and clinical 1-year outcomes in HOCM patients with an enlarged anterior mitral valve leaflet (AMVL) who underwent PTSMA or myectomy in combination with MLE.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Echocardiographic Analysis
Transthoracic echocardiography was routinely performed to evaluate the site of hypertrophy, mitral valve anatomy, and LVOT gradient. Mitral valve opening area was measured in the parasternal short-axis view by tracing the innermost margins of the mitral valve at the point of maximal opening. Mitral leaflet area was calculated with a previously validated formula (4.64+2.17xmitral valve opening area).17 Follow-up measurements included septal thickness at the site of treatment, LVOT gradient, MR grade, severity of SAM, and left atrial and ventricular dimensions. Septal thickness was measured in the parasternal long-axis view in an end-diastolic still frame. Peak LVOT gradient was calculated from the color-guided, continuous-wave Doppler velocity by the modified Bernoulli equation. MR severity was assessed by color flow Doppler echocardiography and graded on a scale from 0 (no regurgitation) to 4 (severe regurgitation). SAM of the AMVL was graded as 0 (absent), 1 (mild; minimal mitral-septal distance >10 mm during systole), 2 (moderate; minimal mitral-septal distance
10 mm during systole), or 3 (marked; brief or prolonged contact between the AMVL and septum).18 Dimensions of the left atrium and left ventricle (LV) were measured with standard M-mode echocardiography from the parasternal long-axis view. In the apical 2- and 4-chamber views, the end-systolic and end-diastolic still frames were manually traced to assess LV ejection fractions.19
Surgical Myectomy in Combination With MLE
Cardiac surgery was performed with standard techniques of cardiopulmonary bypass with moderate hypothermia and myocardial preservation. After aortotomy, the septum was partially resected to the left of an imaginary line through the nadir of the right coronary cusp by a locally designed modified electrocutting technique. If myectomy had been completed, the surgeon performed MLE (Figure 1). 16,20 In this procedure, an autologous pericardial patch is placed across the bending point of the mitral valve where SAM is maximal to stiffen the buckling AMVL (Figure 2). The patch extends the width but not the length of the AMVL, which shifts the centrally attached chordae laterally. As a result, the chordae are stretched and erected, which will enhance leaflet coaptation. Finally, because force produced by blood flow against the leaflet is proportional to its area, the increased leaflet will be pressed posterior, with a decrease in SAM and MR. Postoperative results were assessed by transesophageal and epicardial echocardiography immediately after the patient was weaned from bypass (Figure 3). There were no suboptimal results that required reinstitution of bypass.
|
|
|
Percutaneous Transluminal Septal Myocardial Ablation
The right and left femoral arteries were cannulated by standard techniques. A temporary pacemaker lead (5F temporary pacing electrode catheter [Bard], which was later replaced by a 5F bipolar electrode catheter [Arrow]) was positioned in the right ventricle. Simultaneous measurement of the pressures in the LV (6F pigtail catheter) and in the ascending aorta (7F Judkins guiding catheter) allowed continuous monitoring of the LVOT gradient. Baseline hemodynamic data, including LVOT gradient at rest and at provocation with the Valsalva maneuver, were measured. After identification of the septal branches of the LAD, a 1.5 to 2.5x10 mm balloon was introduced over a 0.014-inch guidewire and positioned into the first septal branch. If the position of the balloon was considered satisfactory, the guidewire was removed and the balloon inflated. Subsequently, 1 mL of echocontrast agent (Levovist, Schering AG) was injected through the balloon catheter shaft. With echocardiography, the myocardial territory supplied by this septal branch was identified, and retrograde spill of contrast into the LAD or the right ventricle was excluded. If satisfying images were obtained, 1 to 5 mL of concentrated ethanol (at a rate of 0.5 mL/30 seconds) was injected through the balloon catheter shaft under close ECG surveillance. After 5 minutes, the balloon was deflated, and coronary angiography was repeated to confirm the patency of the LAD and to confirm discontinuation of the septal branch. If the LVOT gradient remained >30 mm Hg, which was observed in 7 patients, the result was regarded as suboptimal. Subsequently, the procedure was repeated in the same septal branch if the myocardial territory supplied by this branch was relatively large. Otherwise, other septal coronary vessels were judged on usefulness. After the procedure, the pacemaker lead was left in situ for at least 48 hours, and the patient was transferred to the clinical department for telemetric observation.
Follow-Up
One-year follow-up data included mortality, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, medication use, and the above-described echocardiographic variables (septal thickness, LVOT gradient, MR, SAM grade, and left atrial and ventricular dimensions). The clinical status was assessed by one cardiologist (F.J.t.C.) and therefore not subject to interobserver variability. We performed a MEDLINE search (1995 to the present) on studies in English language. Using the search terms "hypertrophic cardiomyopathy" in combination with "septal ablation" or "myectomy," we found 158 and 276 articles, respectively. On the basis of the abstracts, we selected 3 articles that compared septal ablation and septal myectomy.2123
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD values and were compared by the Student unpaired t test. Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages and compared with the
2 test or, when appropriate, with Fishers exact test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Baseline Echocardiographic Measurements
Mean septal thickness, LVOT gradient, and mitral leaflet area in the surgical group matched that in the PTSMA group. Only MR grade was higher in the surgical group. All patients demonstrated typical SAM of the AMVL.
Clinical Outcome
Preinterventional and postinterventional data at 1-year follow-up are presented in Table 1.
Outcome After Surgery
There were no deaths associated with surgery. Three months after surgery, 1 patient was hospitalized with shortness of breath. Echocardiography demonstrated severe MR at the site of the patch due to dehiscence. After surgical correction, the patients clinical course was further uncomplicated. Mean NYHA class in the surgical group improved from 2.8±0.4 to 1.3±0.4 (P<0.05) at follow-up.
Outcome After PTSMA
Two patients died in the PTSMA group. One patient died during the procedure owing to refractory ventricular fibrillation after induction of the infarction. The other patient died after the procedure owing to cardiac tamponade caused by right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead. Since then, we have changed the type of pacemaker lead to avoid this complication. Five other patients were successfully resuscitated for ventricular fibrillation within 24 hours after the intervention. One patient with late recurrence of ventricular fibrillation and another patient with late occurrence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Four patients underwent permanent pacemaker implantation because of complete atrioventricular heart block after the procedure. In 1 patient, a large anterior myocardial infarction (maximal creatine kinase 4700 U/L) was induced because of spill of ethanol in the LAD. Four patients underwent repeat PTSMA after a mean follow-up period of 10 months for recurrence of complaints and significant LVOT gradient. Mean NYHA class in PTSMA patients improved from 2.4±0.5 to 1.5±0.7 (P<0.05) at follow-up.
Echocardiographic Follow-Up Data
As seen in Table 1, the decreases in septal thickness and LVOT gradient at 1-year follow-up were comparable in both groups. Mean residual MR after surgery did not differ from that in the PTSMA group; however, postsurgical MR decreased at least 2 grades in 75% of surgical patients, whereas this improvement was reached in only 10% of the PTSMA patients (P<0.0001). Mean SAM grade decreased significantly more after surgery (P<0.001). In both groups, mean LV end-diastolic dimensions did not change. LV end-systolic dimension remained unchanged after surgery, whereas it increased significantly after PTSMA (P<0.05). In both groups, LV ejection fractions remained preserved at follow-up.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparison of Echocardiographic Parameters After PTSMA and Surgery in Other Studies
As summarized in Table 2
, 3 earlier published studies compared the hemodynamic effects and clinical outcome of PTSMA versus septal myectomy.2123
|
|
LVOT Gradient
Acute LVOT gradient reduction after PTSMA happens mainly owing to a lesser peak acceleration rate of blood flow proximal to the obstruction.26 This may be caused by inhomogeneity in LV contraction due to ischemic septal dysfunction27 and/or conduction abnormalities due to ischemia-induced bundle-branch block.28 Obviously, myectomy results in immediate septal thinning, LVOT widening, and gradient reduction. In the long-term follow-up, maximal gradient reduction after PTSMA is achieved owing to LVOT remodeling that results in widening of the LVOT. That short-term LVOT gradient reduction may indeed be better with surgery was shown in the 3-month follow-up study by Qin et al.22 Retrospective analysis of our data at 3 months also showed a significantly better reduction in LVOT gradient with myectomy (16±11 versus 27±22 mm Hg after PTSMA, P<0.05). At 1-year follow-up, however, there were no significant differences between surgery and PTSMA in the present study and the studies by Nagueh et al21 and Firoozi et al.23 Notably, all studies demonstrated a tendency towards a better reduction with surgery. At present, it is not known whether the timing of maximal LVOT reduction after an intervention is important in reducing morbidity and mortality. The small mean differences in alleviation of the LVOT gradient between surgery and PTSMA may be of importance, because the severity of LVOT gradient is an independent risk factor for functional deterioration.29 After PTSMA, a residual LVOT gradient in the catheterization laboratory was an independent predictor of adverse outcome at later follow-up in a study by Chang et al.30 After myectomy, it was an independent predictor of mortality at prolonged follow-up in a study by Mohr et al.31
SAM of the AMVL
In the study by Qin et al,22 MR as well as SAM of the AMVL were reduced equally after surgery and PTSMA. In the study by Nagueh et al,21 who only reported on MR, an equal reduction was achieved with both treatment modalities. Interestingly, Qin et al22 described 2 patients with an elongated AMVL who did not benefit from PTSMA. In contrast to this observation, Flores-Ramirez et al26 reported that PTSMA could indeed be effective in HOCM patients with redundant mitral leaflet valves. They stated that after successful PTSMA, the streamlines of flow are straightened, and ejection velocity proximal to the LVOT decreases. Consequently, the drag forces that pull the AMVL into the LVOT will diminish, which results in decreased SAM. In the long-term, however, LVOT widening may be of more importance than changes in LV ejection dynamics. In the present study, we noticed a greater reduction in SAM after surgery than with PTSMA. This result favors the hypothesis that MLE has additional advantages over PTSMA for patients with an enlarged AMVL.7,16,32 These advantages include (1) stiffening of the central part of the buckling AMVL to prevent SAM by insertion of a pericardial patch,14,3335 (2) erection of the lax chordae attached to central portions of the AMVL through lateral shift caused by enlargement of the horizontal width of the anterior leaflet,32 (3) maintenance of valve tethering due to an enlarged leaflet area once the streamlines of flow are straightened after septal myectomy,32 and (4) enhanced reduction in MR provided by greater leaflet area. The observation that the preinterventional higher grade of MR in the surgical group was abolished to the same extent as after PTSMA confirms the observation that a larger leaflet contact area reduces MR for any given degree of SAM.17
Comparison of Clinical Parameters After PTSMA and Surgery
Both the present and prior studies reported no difference in mean postinterventional NYHA classification between PTSMA and surgery.
Complications and Reinterventions After PTSMA and Surgery
As summarized in Table 3, more complications were noticed after PTSMA. The need for permanent pacemaker implantation, as noticed in other studies, occurred more often after PTSMA, despite careful contrast identification of the target septal branch. This difference in incidence may be caused by induced transmural myocardial infarction as opposed to well-controlled, more precise myectomy. As seen in the present study, PTSMA also has some relatively unique complications, such as spill of ethanol into the LAD and ventricular fibrillation due to induced myocardial ischemia. In addition, more reinterventions were needed after PTSMA. In contrast to other studies,26 we could not find a relation between reinterventions, the amount of ethanol used, and peak creatine kinase values.
|
Study Limitations
This study was not a randomized trial but an analysis of 2 cohorts treated with a surgical and percutaneous therapy. The present results may not be generalized, because all patients were selected by mitral leaflet area. Furthermore, the groups were dissimilar with respect to age and severity of MR. The choice of treatment, however, was not influenced by these parameters, because after 1999, all patients were treated with PTSMA. It is unlikely that the advanced age in this group would have influenced the differences in hemodynamic outcome compared with surgery. As described by Chang et al,30 age was not a predictor of outcome after PTSMA. It is not clear whether the lesser degree of MR in the PTSMA group influenced the outcome in the present study, but in actual clinical practice, it is likely that patients with more severe MR would be referred to surgery.
Implications and Conclusions
Both myectomy and PTSMA are effective therapies to diminish the LVOT gradient by reduction in septal thickness. After myectomy, maximal gradient reduction is achieved immediately. As mentioned above, the gradient reduction after PTSMA appears to follow a biphasic course, and the maximal reduction is achieved somewhat later in time. In HOCM patients with an enlarged AMVL, myectomy in combination with MLE offers the aforementioned additional effects to further reduce SAM. In the present study, we found more periprocedural complications and need for reinterventions in PTSMA patients. Whether the immediate LVOT gradient reduction with the combined surgical approach will result in a better clinical outcome than with PTSMA during a longer follow-up period is unknown and merits further research.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Sorajja, U. Valeti, R. A. Nishimura, S. R. Ommen, C. S. Rihal, B. J. Gersh, D. O. Hodge, H. V. Schaff, and D. R. Holmes Jr Outcome of Alcohol Septal Ablation for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 131 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Olivotto, S. R. Ommen, M. S. Maron, F. Cecchi, and B. J. Maron Surgical Myectomy Versus Alcohol Septal Ablation for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Will There Ever Be a Randomized Trial? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 831 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron Surgical Myectomy Remains the Primary Treatment Option for Severely Symptomatic Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, July 10, 2007; 116(2): 196 - 206. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Is Surgery Best for HOCM? Journal Watch Cardiology, August 19, 2005; 2005(819): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Yacoub Surgical Versus Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: The Pendulum Swings Circulation, July 26, 2005; 112(4): 450 - 452. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |