| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;113:20-29.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Epidemiology |
From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes Framingham Heart Study (S.K., L.M.S., M.J.K., R.B.D., R.S.V., S.J.R.), Framingham, Mass; the Cardiology Division (S.K.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; the Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (S.K.), Cambridge, Mass; LipoScience, Inc (J.D.O.), Raleigh, NC; the Statistics and Consulting Unit (L.M.S., M.J.K., R.B.D.), Department of Mathematics, Boston University, Boston, Mass; the Lipid Research Laboratory (E.J.S.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; and the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Medical Genetics (P.W.F.W.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Correspondence to Sander J. Robins, MD, Framingham Heart Study, 73 Mt Wayte Ave, Framingham, MA 01702. E-mail sjrobins{at}bu.edu
Received June 5, 2005; revision received September 16, 2005; accepted October 3, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We examined the sex-specific cross-sectional relations of small LDL particle number (determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) to the presence of MetSyn and its components in 2993 Framingham Heart Study participants (mean age, 51 years; 53% women) without cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the relations of small LDL particle number to CVD incidence in people with MetSyn. The MetSyn (
3 of 5 traits as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Adult Treatment Panel III) was present in 27% of men and 17% of women. In both sexes, small LDL particle number increased from 0 to 5 MetSyn traits, a pattern partly accounted for by strong correlations between small LDL particle number and serum triglycerides (r=0.61, P<0.0001) and HDL-C (r=0.55, P<0.0001). Compared with participants without the MetSyn, those with the MetSyn had a higher CVD event rate. However, among participants with the MetSyn, CVD rates were similar for groups with an elevated versus a lower number of small LDL particles (defined by the sex-specific median).
Conclusions Small LDL particle number is elevated in the MetSyn, increases with the number of MetSyn components, and most prominently is correlated with triglycerides and HDL-C. Whereas increased small LDL particle number identified the MetSyn with high sensitivity, a higher small LDL particle number was not associated with greater CVD event rates in people with the MetSyn.
Key Words: cholesterol lipids lipoproteins metabolic syndrome X risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 29
Persons with the MetSyn typically do not have elevated levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). However, a qualitative abnormality in LDLsmaller LDL particle sizeis recognized as being frequently associated with the atherogenic dyslipidemia that characterizes the MetSyn.11 ATP III did not include LDL size among the clinical criteria for the MetSyn because of the uncertainty about the extent to which small LDL size predicts CVD risk independently of triglycerides and HDL-C (with which it is highly correlated).9
Recently, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of lipoproteins has been developed to directly quantify lipoprotein particle concentration for the several kinds of lipoproteins that transport cholesterol in the blood, including small LDL particles.12 Population-based information on NMR-measured small LDL particle number to help characterize the MetSyn is limited. Such information could help define the role of small LDL particle number as a potentially new key component in an expanded definition of the MetSyn, in keeping with a suggestion by a recent consensus conference.13
We sought to accomplish the following: (1) Define the relations between individual components of the MetSyn and small LDL particle number; (2) identify the lipid and nonlipid correlates of small LDL particle number; (3) assess the capacity of small LDL particle number as a single risk factor to predict the presence of the MetSyn; and (4) determine to what extent an increase in small LDL particles was associated with a greater risk of a new CVD event in participants with the MetSyn. Accordingly, we evaluated these questions in a community-based sample of nearly 3000 men and women free of clinical CVD.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
400 mg/dL (n=66), prevalent CVD (n=246), and missing covariates (n=70). After exclusions, 2993 subjects (53% women) remained eligible. The institutional review board at Boston Medical Center approved the study, and all participants gave written, informed consent.
Clinical Evaluation
All participants underwent a routine medical history, physical examination including blood pressure measurement, anthropometry (body mass index and waist circumference), and laboratory assessment of CVD risk factors. Blood pressure was assessed as the average of 2 measurements taken after subjects had been seated for at least 5 minutes. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure
140 mm Hg, a diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive therapy. Diabetes was defined as a fasting plasma glucose value
126 mg/dL or use of hypoglycemic medications. CVD was defined by the presence of coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency, and angina pectoris), death due to coronary heart disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, intermittent claudication, or congestive heart failure. CVD diagnoses were determined by a panel of 3 physicians who reviewed all available medical and hospital records, as described previously.15
Participants were classified as having the MetSyn according to the 2004 revision of ATP III criteria.10 By ATP III criteria, a person had the MetSyn when 3 or more of the following were present: (1) waist circumference >102 cm in men or >88 cm in women; (2) triglycerides
150 mg/dL; (3) HDL-C <40 mg/dL in men or <50 mg/dL in women; (4) systolic blood pressure
130 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure
85 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive therapy; and (5) fasting glucose
100 mg/dL.
Laboratory Methods
Plasma, with EDTA as an anticoagulant, was obtained from subjects who had fasted for at least 10 hours. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-C were measured on an Abbott Diagnostics ABA-200 analyzer. LDL-C was estimated according to the Friedewald formula. Plasma concentrations of apolipoprotein B (apoB) were measured with a commercial immunoturbidimetric assay on a Spectrum CCX analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics) and reagents from Incstar Corp.16 The interassay coefficients of variation were <5% for all lipids and <8% for apoB.
Lipoprotein subclass profiles were measured on plasma samples that had been stored at 70° by a commercially available proton NMR spectroscopic assay (LipoScience) as described previously.17,18 In brief, with the characteristic signals broadcast by lipoprotein subclasses of different sizes, this NMR method directly measures the quantity of lipoprotein particles. Each subclass signal emanates from the total number of terminal methyl groups on the lipids contained within the lipoprotein particle core (cholesterol ester and triglycerides, each contributing 3 methyl groups) and in the lipoprotein particle shell (phospholipid and unesterified cholesterol, each contributing 2 methyl groups). The number of methyl groups contained within a particle depends, to a close approximation, only on the diameter of the lipoprotein particle and is not affected by differences in lipid composition; thus, the methyl NMR signal emitted by each subclass provides a direct measure of the concentration of that subclass.
The particle concentration of the following 9 lipoprotein species were determined: 3 VLDL subclasses [large, >60 nm (including chylomicrons); intermediate, 35 to 60 nm; small, 27 to 35 nm]; 3 LDL subclasses (IDL, 23 to 27 nm; large LDL, 21.3 to 23 nm; small LDL, 18.3 to 21.2 nm); and 3 HDL subclasses (large, 8.8 to 13 nm; intermediate, 8.2 to 8.8 nm; small, 7.3 to 8.2 nm). The small LDL subclass comprises the sum of subclasses formerly labeled "intermediate" (19.8 to 21.2 nm) and "small" (18.3 to 19.7 nm),17 because concentrations of both have very similar relations to lipid levels. Weighted-average VLDL, LDL, and HDL particle sizes (nm diameter) were computed as the sum of the diameter of each subclass multiplied by its relative mass percentage as estimated from the amplitude of its methyl NMR signal. Interassay coefficients of variation for NMR-derived lipoprotein particle concentrations were <3% for VLDL, LDL, and HDL; <4% for VLDL size; and <1% for LDL and HDL size. For all biochemical and NMR analyses, samples were handled in a blinded fashion such that all investigators had no knowledge of the participants MetSyn status.
Statistical Analyses
Means and standard deviations are reported for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. All analyses were performed with SAS 8.19 Sex-specific multiple linear-regression analysis was used to estimate differences between participants with and without the MetSyn after adjustment for age. To identify the NMR lipoprotein subclass features most significantly related to the MetSyn, we conducted sex-specific logistic regression with backward selection. The model consisted of MetSyn status as the dependent variable and the following candidate covariates: age, small LDL particle number, large LDL particle number, IDL particle number, total VLDL particle number, and total HDL particle number.
After adjustment for age and sex, partial Pearson correlations between small LDL particle number, MetSyn components, and apoB were calculated (PROC CORR). To address which component of the MetSyn was most strongly related to small LDL particle number, we used sex-specific linear-regression analysis (PROC REG) with small LDL particle number as the dependent variable and the following covariates: age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, fasting glucose, HDL-C, and triglycerides.
Tests of trend are presented to evaluate the association between age-adjusted NMR-derived lipoprotein or biochemical lipid measures and the number of MetSyn components. To address the question of whether apoB or small LDL particle number was more strongly associated with the MetSyn, we constructed logistic-regression models (PROC LOGISTIC) with the MetSyn as the dependent variable and the following set of covariates: for model 1, age, sex, and small LDL particle number and for model 2, age, sex, and apoB.
To assess the utility of small LDL particle number to identify the MetSyn, we constructed sex-specific receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curve. The area under the curve serves as an index of global test performance of small LDL particle number for identification of the MetSyn across the entire range of values, with an area under the curve of 0.5 indicating no discrimination ability.20 We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for select LDL particle number cutpoints for identifying the MetSyn.
To assess whether CVD incidence among those with the MetSyn varied according to small LDL particle number or LDL-C, we calculated age-adjusted CVD event rates for 3 strata using Cox proportional hazards model: MetSyn absent, MetSyn present/below sex-specific median of small LDL particle number (for the group with MetSyn), and MetSyn present/above sex-specific median of small LDL particle number (for the group with the MetSyn). These analyses were sex specific. Similar strata were constructed by substituting LDL-C for small LDL particle number. CVD events occurring from the time of baseline examination (cycle 4, 1987 to 1990) to December 2004 were included in the analysis. Person-years of follow-up were accrued from baseline to the date of the first event or censored at the date of December 2004 if free of a CVD event.
Because we investigated 18 biochemical and NMR-derived lipid/lipoprotein measures, a 2-sided P<0.003 was considered statistically significant. This significance criterion is based on the Bonferroni correction to account for multiple testing.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Plasma levels of lipids and apoB in men and women with or without the MetSyn are displayed in Table 2. As would be expected, all laboratory and clinical parameters that were used to define the presence of the MetSyn were significantly different from those in participants without the MetSyn. In addition, apoB was higher in those with the MetSyn than in those without the MetSyn. In contrast, mean levels of LDL-C were similar in men with or without the MetSyn, although in women with the MetSyn, LDL-C was modestly higher than in those without the MetSyn.
|
Compared with those without the MetSyn, participants with the MetSyn had significantly higher small LDL particle number (Table 2). Mean LDL particle size was smaller in the MetSyn as a result of the change in LDL subclass distribution to predominantly smaller LDL particles (Table 2). The NMR lipoprotein particle measures show that the higher triglyceride levels of participants with the MetSyn arose predominantly from increased numbers of large and intermediate-size VLDL subclasses, not from differences in small VLDL particle concentrations (Table 2). Similarly, the lower HDL-C levels associated with the MetSyn resulted mainly from fewer numbers of large HDL subclass particles.
Given that participants with and without the MetSyn differed across a number of lipoprotein subclass measures, we sought to identify the most prominent differences through backward selection. In both men and women, small LDL particle number, total VLDL particle number, and total HDL particle number were each significantly related to MetSyn (each P<0.0001) in the final stepwise model.
Small LDL particle number was significantly correlated with each component of the MetSyn, with the strongest correlations involving HDL-C and triglycerides (Table 3). Small LDL particle number was also strongly correlated with serum apoB (Table 3). In sex-specific linear-regression models with small LDL particle number as the dependent variable and the 5 MetSyn components as independent variables, we identified HDL-C and triglycerides as the only 2 components significantly associated with small LDL particle number (each P<0.0001).
|
The variation in total LDL particle number and LDL-C levels as a function of HDL-C concentration is displayed in Figure 1. As HDL-C level decreased, total LDL particle number continually rose, whereas the level of LDL-C remained relatively low (<140 mg/dL). A similar pattern was observed when we compared levels of total LDL particles and LDL-C as a function of triglyceride level (Figure 2). As the triglyceride level increased to &300 mg/dL, the number of total LDL particles rose while the levels of LDL-C again remained low.
|
|
Small LDL particle number and total LDL particle number each increased with the number of MetSyn components in both sexes, whereas the number of large LDL particles decreased (Table 4). ApoB concentrations were also associated with the number of MetSyn components in both men and women. The association between small LDL particle number and the MetSyn was modestly stronger than that between apoB and the MetSyn; the c statistic associated with an age- and sex-adjusted model including small LDL particle number was 0.81, and for that including apoB, it was 0.75.
|
We evaluated the capacity of small LDL particle number to differentiate the presence from the absence of the MetSyn by an ROC curve analysis (Figure 3). In women, the area under the ROC curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.85). In women, a small LDL particle number cutoff value of 800 nmol/L had a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 84% for diagnosis of the MetSyn (Table 5). Similar results were seen in men (Figure 3).
|
|
Among participants with the MetSyn, we evaluated whether small LDL particle number (or LDL-C) was associated with an increased risk of incident CVD (Table 6). Compared with participants without the MetSyn, participants with the MetSyn had a higher rate of CVD events; however, among men and women with the MetSyn, CVD event rates did not differ significantly between those with a small LDL particle number above versus below the median (Table 6). Similarly, among men and women with the MetSyn, CVD event rates did not differ significantly between those with an LDL-C above or below the median (Table 7).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous Studies
Prior work based on gradient gel electrophoresis has demonstrated that individuals with the MetSyn have smaller, more dense LDL particles.21 Furthermore, with gel electrophoresis, small, dense LDL particles have also been associated with increased triglycerides, lower HDL-C, and increased apoB levels.11,22,23 Although LDL particle numbers cannot be directly assessed by gel electrophoresis, apoB does provide a measure of combined LDL and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (mainly VLDL) particle numbers24 and is a good surrogate measure for increased LDL particle numbers in people with diabetic dyslipidemia24 as well as with the MetSyn and insulin resistance.25,26
Compared with apoB measurement, a more detailed assessment of LDL particle numbers and size can be achieved with NMR spectroscopy. Two prior studies have evaluated the relations between NMR-measured LDL particle number and the risk of CVD. In a nested case-control study of 260 women, Blake et al27 found that the number of small LDL particles was a predictor of CVD risk. In a sample of elderly individuals assessed in a similar nested case-control design, Kuller et al28 found that the number of small LDL particles predicted CVD risk in women but not in men.
LDL-C and LDL Particle Number
The present study illustrates and provides a potential explanation for the dissociation between LDL-C and LDL particle number in individuals with the MetSyn. We show that the increase in small LDL particle numbers seen in the MetSyn is coupled to a significant reduction in the numbers of large LDL particles. This decrease in large LDL particle number is not numerically equivalent to the increase in small LDL particle number, and so, with a transition to more, smaller LDL particles, total LDL particle number is increased in the MetSyn. However, because large LDL particles contain much more cholesterol than do small LDL particles, the decrease in large LDL particles may not result in a change in the total LDL-C concentration. Thus, whereas LDL-C may not be much different in those with and without the MetSyn, LDL particle number and in particular, small LDL particle number may differ dramatically.
Mechanism Linking Elevated Small LDL Particle Number and the MetSyn
We observed that increases in the numbers of small LDL particles clustered with the MetSyn and that this association was closely linked to increases in triglycerides (or NMR-measured VLDL particle numbers) and decreases in HDL-C (or NMR-measured HDL particle numbers). These close associations would seem to be due to the strong relation of the MetSyn to underlying insulin resistance.29 Several investigators have demonstrated that insulin resistance is associated with increased small LDL particle numbers. In the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study, Goff et al30 reported that insulin resistance was correlated with increased numbers of small LDL particles by NMR analysis. Very similar results were reported by Garvey and associates,31 who found that when compared with insulin-sensitive subjects, those with insulin resistance and diabetes had increased numbers of small LDL particles and higher total LDL particle numbers.
How might the MetSyn with underlying insulin resistance lead to the generation of increased numbers of small LDL particles? There is substantial evidence to show that excess adiposity, especially in the presence of diabetes or insulin resistance, leads to increased free fatty acid production by adipocytes.24,32 These free fatty acids are taken up by the liver and used for new triglyceride synthesis. As a consequence of increased hepatic triglyceride synthesis, there is increased synthesis and secretion of VLDL particles by the liver.33 These VLDL particles represent the substrate for 2 sequential reactions that could lead to an increased number of small LDL particles in the circulation. First, through the action of cholesterol ester transfer protein, an appreciable amount of triglyceride in VLDL may be exchanged for cholesterol ester in plasma LDL.34 Second, these now-triglyceride-enriched (and cholesterol-depleted) LDL particles become a favorable substrate for hepatic lipase and may be transformed into smaller LDL particles by lipase-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis.35 The metabolic model described seems best to integrate the steady-state and dynamic lipoprotein studies available to date (reviewed in Berneis and Krauss36 and Packard37).
Small LDL Particle Number and CVD
Small LDL particles have been suggested to be inherently more atherogenic, binding less well to the LDL receptor,38 entering the arterial wall more easily39,40 and showing greater susceptibility to oxidation than large LDL.41 As a result, it has been hypothesized that the CVD risk associated with the MetSyn may at least in part be attributable to small LDL particles;36,42 however, this hypothesis has been challenged.43
We separated those with the MetSyn into groups with high and low numbers of small LDL particles and did not find that higher numbers of small LDL particles were associated with greater CVD risk. Several explanations for this observation are possible. We evaluated the discriminative power of small LDL particle number only in a high-risk subset, those with the MetSyn. It is possible that small LDL particle number will better predict CVD risk across a broader spectrum of subjects that also includes individuals without the MetSyn. Alternatively, small LDL particle number elevation may be related to clinical CVD through the correlated changes in several other potential proatherogenic features (ie, high triglycerides, low HDL-C, increased apoB).43 In this context, small LDL particle number may serve as marker of a metabolic condition and not necessarily directly promote atherosclerosis.44
Study Limitations
Several potential limitations of this analysis deserve mention. First, the Framingham Heart Study population is predominantly white, and consequently, our findings may not be entirely applicable to other populations. Second, the CVD event rates that were tabulated and related to the presence or absence of the MetSyn and to numbers of small LDL particles represent a variety of vascular pathological processes. Consequently, it is possible that high small LDL particle numbers may be related to a single or a more restricted spectrum of CVD events than was used for this analysis. Third, the Framingham population selected for this analysis was relatively young (averaging 51 years) with probably fewer individuals with the MetSyn than if this population had been older. Last, insufficient statistical power may have limited our ability to detect a relation between small LDL particle number and CVD risk in the MetSyn, and studies in larger samples may be needed.
Conclusion
An increase in LDL particle numbers, especially small LDL, parallels an increase in MetSyn components in both men and women in the Framingham Heart Study population. The increase in small LDL particles was especially associated with increases in triglycerides and decreases in HDL-C but was not reflected by changes in the concentration of LDL-C. Although increased small LDL particle number as a single measure is highly predictive of the MetSyn, a higher small LDL particle number was not associated with an increased CVD event rate in people with the MetSyn.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosure
Dr Otvos is an employee of LipoScience, Inc.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Brunzell, M. Davidson, C. D. Furberg, R. B. Goldberg, B. V. Howard, J. H. Stein, and J. L. Witztum Lipoprotein Management in Patients With Cardiometabolic Risk: Consensus Conference Report From the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1512 - 1524. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Brunzell, M. Davidson, C. D. Furberg, R. B. Goldberg, B. V. Howard, J. H. Stein, and J. L. Witztum Lipoprotein Management in Patients With Cardiometabolic Risk: Consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation Diabetes Care, April 1, 2008; 31(4): 811 - 822. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Giral, N. Jacob, C. Dourmap, B. Hansel, A. Carrie, E. Bruckert, X. Girerd, and M. J. Chapman Elevated Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Activity and Perturbed Thiol Profile Are Associated With Features of Metabolic Syndrome Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): 587 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Remick, J. A. Underberg, and N. R. Shah Utility of Different Lipid Measures to Predict Coronary Heart Disease JAMA, January 2, 2008; 299(1): 35 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Nesto LDL Cholesterol Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes: What Is the Optimum Approach? Clin. Diabetes, January 1, 2008; 26(1): 8 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Arsenault, I. Lemieux, J.-P. Despres, N. J. Wareham, R. Luben, J. J.P. Kastelein, K.-T. Khaw, and S. M. Boekholdt Cholesterol levels in small LDL particles predict the risk of coronary heart disease in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2770 - 2777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Mudd, B. A. Borlaug, P. V. Johnston, B. G. Kral, R. Rouf, R. S. Blumenthal, and P. O. Kwiterovich Jr Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Defining the Role of Low-Density Lipoprotein Heterogeneity in Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 30, 2007; 50(18): 1735 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Pokrywka DEBATING CARDIOVASCULAR GOALS DOC News, October 1, 2007; 4(10): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Rosenson, D. A. Wolff, A. L. Huskin, I. B. Helenowski, and A. W. Rademaker Fenofibrate Therapy Ameliorates Fasting and Postprandial Lipoproteinemia, Oxidative Stress, and the Inflammatory Response in Subjects With Hypertriglyceridemia and the Metabolic Syndrome Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 1945 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Kakafika, D. P. Mikhailidis, A. Karagiannis, and V. G. Athyros The Role of Endocannabinoid System Blockade in the Treatment of the Metabolic Syndrome J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 642 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kahn Metabolic Syndrome: Is It a Syndrome? Does It Matter? Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1806 - 1811. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||