| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;113:2037-2044.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Congenital Heart Disease |
From Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (L.C., S.K., G.D., S. Sridharan, S. Schievano, R.J., J.E.D., P.B., A.M.T.) and The Heart Hospital (B.M., D.P.), London, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to Dr Louise Coats, Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond St, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. E-mail lecoats{at}doctors.org.uk
Received October 12, 2005; revision received January 18, 2006; accepted February 21, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We studied 18 patients who underwent PPVI for RVOTO (72% male, median age 20 years) from a total of 93 who had this procedure for various indications. All had a right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) gradient >50 mm Hg on echocardiography without important pulmonary regurgitation (less than mild or regurgitant fraction <10% on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, tissue Doppler echocardiography, and MRI were performed before and within 50 days of PPVI. PPVI reduced RVOT gradient (51.4 to 21.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and right ventricular systolic pressure (72.8 to 47.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) at catheterization. Symptoms and aerobic (25.7 to 28.9 mL · kg1 · min1, P=0.002) and anaerobic (14.4 to 16.2 mL · kg1 · min1, P=0.002) exercise capacity improved. Myocardial systolic velocity improved acutely (tricuspid 4.8 to 5.3 cm/s, P=0.05; mitral 4.7 to 5.5 cm/s, P=0.01), whereas isovolumic acceleration was unchanged. The tricuspid annular velocity was not maintained on intermediate follow-up. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (99.9 to 89.7 mL/m2, P<0.001) fell, whereas effective stroke volume (43.7 to 48.3 mL/m2, P=0.06) and ejection fraction (48.0% to 56.8%, P=0.01) increased. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (72.5 to 77.4 mL/m2, P=0.145), stroke volume (45.3 to 50.6 mL/m2, P=0.02), and ejection fraction (62.6% to 65.8%, P=0.03) increased.
Conclusions PPVI relieves RVOTO, which leads to an early improvement in biventricular performance. Furthermore, it reduces symptoms and improves exercise tolerance. These findings have important implications for the management of this increasingly common condition.
Key Words: congenital heart defects catheterization echocardiography magnetic resonance imaging valves
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 2044
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) provides a potentially superior catheter-based treatment option to bare stenting (Figures 1 and 2
), because relief of stenosis is not replaced with regurgitation when the valve is trapped.11 Moreover, it provides a unique model to study the impact of chronic RVOTO on ventricular function and its potential for recovery, without the confounding effects of cardiac surgery and pulmonary incompetence. The purpose of the present study was to investigate, for the first time, the early clinical and physiological response to relief of chronic RVOTO late after repair of a range of complex congenital cardiac malformations.
|
|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
22 mm. The patients referred for this procedure represented the more severe end of the spectrum, with a median of 3 prior operations (range 1 to 5). From this population, we selected patients with isolated RVOTO (peak RVOT gradient >50 mm Hg on echocardiography). Patients who had evidence of a pulmonary regurgitant fraction >10% on MRI (n=51) or, if MRI was not performed, more than mild pulmonary regurgitation on transthoracic echocardiography (n=15) were excluded. Of a total of 27 eligible patients, 9 had a contraindication to or could not undergo MRI and were not included and therefore did not undergo formal assessment according to the research protocol. The remaining 18 patients are the subjects of the present study. None had branch pulmonary artery stenosis or significant intracardiac shunting. Assessment of New York Heart Association functional class, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, tissue Doppler echocardiography, and MRI were performed before and early after PPVI. Separate investigators performed the clinical assessment (SK), metabolic exercise testing (GD), tissue Doppler echocardiography (LC), and MRI (AT); all were blinded to the results of the other tests, with postprocessing performed in a random fashion with no prior knowledge of whether the examination was preintervention or postintervention. The local research ethics committees approved the study, and all subjects (and/or a parent/guardian) gave informed written consent.
Invasive Pressure Monitoring
PPVI was performed under general anesthesia as described previously.11 One patient had an additional bare stent placed in the main pulmonary artery. Right ventricular systolic and end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressure (beyond the obstruction) were measured before and after PPVI.
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed on a bicycle ergometer (Sensormedics Ergoline 800, Blitz, Germany) with respiratory gas exchange analysis before PPVI and at a median of 20 days (range 3 to 42 days) after PPVI. Work rate was increased with a ramp protocol. A 12-lead ECG was monitored continuously and blood pressure recorded every 2 minutes during exercise. Breath-by-breath respiratory gas exchange measurements were recorded throughout the test and averaged over a peak width of 20 seconds at the end of exercise to determine maximum values. Anaerobic threshold was determined by the modified V-slope method.13
Conventional and Tissue Doppler Echocardiography
Transthoracic imaging of the heart was performed with a Vivid 7 (GE Vingmed, Milwaukee, Wis) with a transducer frequency of 3.5 MHz before PPVI and at a median of 1 day (range 1 to 4 days) after PPVI. A subset of the studied population (n=10) who were able to return to our institutions for follow-up underwent further detailed imaging at 1 and 3 months. These patients are indicated in Table 1. Right ventricular systolic pressure was calculated from the continuous-wave Doppler profile of the tricuspid regurgitation jet,14 and peak RVOT gradient was calculated in the same way from the signal across the RVOT. Right ventricular wall thickness was measured in the parasternal long-axis view to assess the presence of hypertrophy.15 The right ventricular free wall and left ventricular lateral wall were imaged from the apical position during quiet breathing. Color-coded myocardial velocities of the tricuspid and mitral annulus were acquired with a mean frame rate of 166±27 s1. A cineloop of 3 consecutive cardiac cycles was digitally stored for offline analysis with Echopac software (GE Vingmed, Milwaukee, Wis). Isovolumic acceleration, a relatively load independent parameter,16,17 and peak myocardial velocity during systole (Sa), which has been demonstrated to correlate with ejection fraction,18,19 were measured at the lateral tricuspid and mitral annuluses to assess global systolic function. Myocardial velocities during early diastole (Ea) and late diastole (Aa) were also measured. Tracking of the region of interest to myocardial motion was performed. Measurements were performed on 3 consecutive cardiac cycles, and the average of these values was calculated.
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI was performed at 1.5 T (Symphony Maestro Series; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) before PPVI and at a median of 6 days (range 1 to 50 days) after PPVI. Retrospective gated steady-state free-precession cine magnetic resonance images of the heart were acquired in the vertical long-axis, 4-chamber view, short-axis views that included the extent of both ventricles (9 to 12 slices), and 2 long-axis planes of the RVOT and left ventricular outflow tract for positioning of through-plane flow quantification.20 Images were acquired during a single breath-hold. The cine SSFP sequence parameters were as follows: repetition time 2.8 ms, echo time 1.4 ms, flip angle 51°, slice thickness 8 mm, matrix 192x256, field of view 300 to 380 mm, and temporal resolution 25 to 40 phases.
Assessment of right ventricular and left ventricular volumes was performed by manually defining the endocardial outline at end diastole and end systole in each of the short-axis cine images (Argus; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). The end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume were calculated with Simpsons rule for each ventricle, and from these volumes, the stroke volume and ejection fraction were derived.
Pulmonary artery flow data were acquired with a flow-sensitive gradient echo sequence (repetition time 8 ms, echo time 3.8 ms, flip angle 30°, slice thickness 6 mm, matrix 256x256) during free breathing. A phase-correction filter was used to correct for phase errors introduced by eddy currents and Maxwell terms. Image planes were located at the midpoint of the pulmonary trunk/conduit before PPVI and just above the stent after PPVI, to avoid stent artifact. Through-plane flow data (40 phases per cardiac cycle) was acquired with retrospective cardiac gating. The velocity-encoded peak velocity was varied according to the degree of pulmonary trunk/homograft stenosis. Pulmonary flow was calculated from the phase-contrast images with a semiautomatic vessel edge-detection algorithm with operator correction. Regurgitant fraction was calculated as the percent backward flow over forward flow. All volume and flow measurements were indexed for body surface area and expressed in mL/m2.
Statistical Analysis
All parametric data are expressed as mean±SD, and comparisons before and after PPVI were made with a paired Student t test. Nonparametric data were summarized with the median and compared before and after PPVI with the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation between parametric variables was assessed with Pearsons test. Statistical significance was inferred when P<0.05. All statistical testing and data analysis were performed with SPSS version 11 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).
The authors had full access to the data and take responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 mm). The ratio of right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) assessed by MRI was increased at 1.41±0.39, which indicates the presence of relative right ventricular dilatation21 (normal value=1.15). A strong negative correlation was seen between right ventricular ejection fraction and the RVEDV:LVEDV ratio (r=0.771, P<0.001; Figure 3). Isovolumic acceleration at the tricuspid annulus was 0.94±0.32 m/s2 and was reduced compared with published data in normal individuals with a comparable age distribution (normal value=1.8 m/s2).16,22
|
Excluded Patients
Nine patients were not included in the present study protocol because they were unable to undergo magnetic resonance scanning (5 patients formed part of the initial feasibility series23 that did not undergo MRI, 2 had arrhythmia that precluded useful imaging, and 2 patients would have required general anesthesia, which was not part of our imaging protocol). The characteristics of these 9 patients are shown in Table 2.
|
Invasive Pressure Monitoring
PPVI was performed successfully in all subjects (procedure time 77.6±38.3 minutes, fluoroscopy time 12.9±8.2 minutes). After valve implantation, right ventricular systolic pressure (from 72.8±18.2 to 47.3±9.6 mm Hg, P<0.001) and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (from 11.3±4.4 to 9.6±4.3 mm Hg, P=0.04) fell. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure increased (from 21.4±6.2 to 25.7±8.5 mm Hg, P<0.001) and RVOT gradient fell (from 51.4±21.1 to 21.7±8.9 mm Hg, P<0.001). Pressures are summarized in Table 3. The 9 patients excluded from this analysis demonstrated similar pressure changes after PPVI (right ventricular systolic pressure decreased from 71.4±13.2 to 49.8±16.2 mm Hg, P=0.003; right ventricular end-diastolic pressure decreased from 13.1±5.2 to 11.9±3.1 mm Hg, P=0.329; pulmonary artery systolic pressure increased from 20.4±8.8 to 26.1±5.4 mm Hg, P=0.025; and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure increased from 8.4±2.6 to 13.2±8.9 mm Hg, P=0.002).
|
New York Heart Association Class
New York Heart Association class fell from a median of 2 to 1 (P<0.001) 1 month after PPVI (Figure 4).
|
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
Seventeen of 18 patients completed maximal exercise tests (1 patient had a viral infection after PPVI and was excluded from the analysis). After PPVI, there was a marked improvement in peak
O2 (from 25.7±6.4 to 28.9±6.4 mL · kg1 · min1, P=0.002; Figure 5) and in anaerobic threshold (from 14.4±3.6 to 16.2±3.9 mL · kg1 · min1, P=0.002; Figure 5). The workload achieved also increased significantly (from 131.5±42.8 to 145.9±45.4 W, P=0.015). Exercise parameters are summarized in Table 4.
|
|
Conventional and Tissue Doppler Echocardiography
There was a significant fall in right ventricular systolic pressure (from 84.9±17.5 to 50.7±14.4 mm Hg, P<0.001) and in RVOT gradient (from 85.2±19.0 to 41.1±12.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) after PPVI. In the subset of patients who were studied at 1 and 3 months, these findings were sustained (Figure 6). The discrepancy between echocardiographic and catheter measurements of RVOT pressure gradients are likely to reflect both the conscious state of the patient and the technical differences between the 2 techniques.24 Peak systolic velocity improved acutely at both the tricuspid annulus (from 4.8±1.1 to 5.3±1.1 cm/s, P=0.05) and the mitral annulus (from 4.7±1.5 to 5.5±1.8 cm/s, P=0.01). Isovolumic acceleration did not change significantly at the tricuspid annulus (from 0.94±0.32 to 1.0±0.48 m/s2, P=0.482) or the mitral annulus (from 0.94±0.41 to 0.98±0.35 m/s2, P=0.673). Diastolic velocities showed no change, with the exception of peak late diastolic velocity (Aa) at the tricuspid annulus, which fell (from 4.6±1.9 to 4.0±1.5 cm/s, P=0.03). In the subset of patients who were studied at 1 and 3 months after PPVI, the increase in systolic velocity at the mitral annulus tended to remain elevated, whereas at the tricuspid annulus, it appeared transient. Diastolic parameters did not change. There was a negative correlation between baseline isovolumic acceleration at the tricuspid annulus and improvement in exercise capacity (r=0.57, P=0.02; Figure 7). There was no significant change in heart rate before PPVI or during follow-up. Echocardiography parameters are summarized in Table 5 and Table 6.
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Patient selection ensured that the pulmonary regurgitant fraction before PPVI was small, and this did not increase after valve implantation (from 3.6±3.9% to 1.4±2.5%, P=0.06). However, after PPVI, there was a significant reduction in right ventricular end-systolic volume (from 54.2±29.0 to 40.6±20.9 mL/m2, P=0.001) and in RVEDV (from 99.9±29.3 to 89.7±23.4 mL/m2, P<0.001). Effective right ventricular stroke volume increased, although the change did not quite reach statistical significance (from 43.7±13.8 to 48.3±11.0, mL/m2, P=0.06). Right ventricular ejection fraction improved substantially (from 48.0±18.8% to 56.8±15.2%, P=0.01). LVEDV tended to increase (from 72.5±15.8 to 77.4±14.1 mL/m2, P=0.145), and there was a significant improvement in left ventricular stroke volume (from 45.3±12.2 to 50.6±11.2 mL/m2, P=0.02) and in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 62.6±10.3% to 65.8±10.0%, P=0.03). There was no significant change in heart rate, which indicates that cardiac output increased after PPVI. Magnetic resonance parameters are summarized in Table 7.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies in patients with congenital pulmonary valvar stenosis who are treated with balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty have suggested that RVOTO is well-tolerated.2527 These findings, however, do not apply to acquired RVOTO in patients with complex congenital lesions, for whom this approach is not effective.28,29 Furthermore, the impact of acquired RVOTO relief has been hard to study because of the confounding effect of cardiopulmonary bypass with surgery30 or the inevitable pulmonary regurgitation that complicates the alternative treatment of bare-stent implantation.57 PPVI permits, for the first time, investigation of the direct effects of relief of chronic right ventricular pressure overload on cardiac function in this increasingly common clinical situation.
The change in right ventricular performance after PPVI facilitates interpretation of the structure and function seen before intervention. We found the expected increase in right ventricular end-systolic volume, RVEDV, wall thickness, and end diastolic pressure, which are adaptive measures to maintain right ventricular stroke volume in the presence of increased afterload, whereas the reduced isovolumic acceleration reflected intrinsic myocardial impairment. However, after PPVI, the increase in right ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction that accompanied the reduction in right ventricular end-systolic volume, RVEDV, and end-diastolic pressure indicates that the observed adaptive mechanisms were only partially successful. Our interpretation is that relief of RVOTO, in this population, caused a shift back to the compensatory limb of the Frank-Starling curve by a ventricle that was "overstretched" and decompensated before intervention. The alternative explanation of an increase in stroke volume due to improved contractility is not supported by either the lack of change in isovolumic acceleration or the observed reduction in end-diastolic pressure. The improvement in systolic velocity at the tricuspid annulus is difficult to interpret in view of its response to both contractility and loading conditions, especially given the finding that this improvement was transient. Heart rate remained unchanged before and after PPVI and thus is unlikely to have played a role in the observed improvement.
The benefits of relief of RVOTO were also seen in the left ventricle: there was an increase in LVEDV, left ventricular stroke volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction, which disputes previous reports that right ventricular pressure overload does not affect left ventricular ejection fraction.31 There are several potential explanations for this. One factor is likely to be an increase in left ventricular preload that results in increased diastolic myocardial stretch and thus stroke volume. This mechanism is supported by the increase in systolic velocity observed at the mitral annulus by tissue Doppler evaluation that was maintained at 3 months. Another potential contributor to improved left ventricular performance is restoration of more normal septal behavior as a result of unloading the right ventricle.32 The strong correlation between right ventricular ejection fraction and relative ventricular size, before PPVI, underscores the importance of ventricular interaction in the determination of right ventricular performance. Finally, a third mechanism, an increase in intrinsic contractility, remains possible but is not supported by our isovolumic acceleration measurements, which did not change. A more detailed study of ventricular interaction is required to better understand this complex physiology. Importantly, the changes in right and left ventricular function were accompanied by improvement in both subjective and objective measures of symptoms and exercise performance.
The findings in the present study population are not necessarily applicable to other patients with RVOTO. It is possible that RVOTO may lead to irrecoverable myocardial dysfunction if baseline function is poor or exposure to obstruction is more prolonged. The association between hypertrophy and nonviable myocardium has been seen in other examples of a pressure-overloaded right ventricle,33 and progression to irreversible cardiac failure in this situation is the probable consequence. Nevertheless, in the present study population, we observed the best improvement in the subjects with the most impaired initial right ventricular function. The observed improvement, however, resulted from improved loading conditions and not recovery of intrinsic myocardial contractile function.
PPVI did not completely relieve RVOTO in this group, and the long-term fate of the valved stent is still unknown. Furthermore, our finding of improved biventricular performance will need to be demonstrated in the longer term before PPVI can be recommended as the definitive treatment for pure RVOTO. This and the potential for right ventricular remodeling remain important areas for future study. A direct comparison with bare stenting or surgical treatment of RVOT obstruction may also offer further information about the relative benefit of this procedure. However, this exciting new technique permits, for the first time, relief of RVOTO without new pulmonary regurgitation or myocardial damage from cardiopulmonary bypass. The rapid clinical and functional benefits from relief of RVOTO support the current trend for early intervention with the aim of preserving cardiac function and avoiding the risk of irreversible myocardial damage associated with chronic right ventricular pressure overload.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosures
Dr Coats receives honoraria from Medtronic and Sanofi-Aventis. Dr Bonhoeffer is a consultant for NuMed and Medtronic and has received an educational grant from Medtronic. Dr Deanfield received honoraria from Pfizer and Sanofi-Aventis and is on the speakers bureau of Pfizer and Sanofi-Aventis and has served as an expert witness in legal cases in the United Kingdom.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
Circulation 2006 113: 2031.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Rodes-Cabau, C. Houde, J. Perron, L. N. Benson, and P. Pibarot Delayed improvement in valve hemodynamic performance after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1787 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Rhodes, Z. M. Hijazi, and R. J. Sommer Pathophysiology of Congenital Heart Disease in the Adult, Part II: Simple Obstructive Lesions Circulation, March 4, 2008; 117(9): 1228 - 1237. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nordmeyer, L. Coats, P. Lurz, T.-Y. Lee, G. Derrick, P. Rees, S. Cullen, A. M. Taylor, S. Khambadkone, and P. Bonhoeffer Percutaneous pulmonary valve-in-valve implantation: a successful treatment concept for early device failure Eur. Heart J., March 3, 2008; (2008) ehn073v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bedard, D. F. Shore, and M. A. Gatzoulis Adult congenital heart disease: a 2008 overview Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2008; 85(1): 151 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Feldman and M. B. Leon Prospects for Percutaneous Valve Therapies Circulation, December 11, 2007; 116(24): 2866 - 2877. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Coats, S. Khambadkone, G. Derrick, M. Hughes, R. Jones, B. Mist, D. Pellerin, J. Marek, J. E. Deanfield, P. Bonhoeffer, et al. Physiological consequences of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: the different behaviour of volume- and pressure-overloaded ventricles Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1886 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Graham Jr The Year in Congenital Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 24, 2007; 50(4): 368 - 377. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Inglessis and M. J. Landzberg Interventional Catheterization in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Circulation, March 27, 2007; 115(12): 1622 - 1633. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||