(Circulation. 2006;114:1985-1991.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science for Clinicians |
From the Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.F.B., C.A.S.), and Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen (M.P.P.), the Netherlands.
Correspondence to Maikel P. Peppelenbosch, Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands. E-mail m.peppelenbosch{at}med.umcg.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: angiogenesis ischemia signal transduction receptors hedgehog cholesterol
| A Short Introduction to Morphogens |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two main mechanisms inform cells about their position. By cell-cell interactions, cells receive information concerning their position from neighboring cells. Alternatively, gradients of signaling proteins called "morphogens" (reviewed in Ashe and Briscoe1) diffuse through tissue over time. In the illustration for the hypothetical morphogens signal A and signal B (Figure 1), cell 1 has a high concentration of signal protein A in its local environment, whereas cell 2 senses a lower concentration. On the basis of the simple information conveyed by a single morphogen gradient, these cells are already destined to different fates. This mechanism suffices in the developing neural crest, which gives rise to a variety of tissue, including the aortic arch.2 In addition to sensing a certain concentration of signal A, cell 3 also senses signal B and is able to act accordingly. In a nutshell, the interplay between different morphogen gradients has complex resultsfor instance, determining how extremities and digits are formed. However, in some situations, the mere presence of a morphogen rather than a gradient is enough for proper patterning or tissue repair. Although morphogen gradients are important in developing tissues, it appears that they are not that important in stable adult cells, in which cell-cell interactions predominate in determining cell fate.
|
In humans, 4 families of morphogens are critical for providing almost all positional information. Hence, the expression "morphogenetic code" is used to describe the combined action of the 4 morphogen gradients that provide positional information to the differentiating cell. The first of these families is the wingless/Int (Wnt) family of extracellular glycoproteins, important in axis determination in the developing embryo3 (Figure 2A), heart valve formation,4 and colorectal cancer (through activating mutations in this signaling pathway).5 The second family is the group of hormones that belong to the transforming growth factor-ß/bone morphogenetic protein/activin family, involved in a plethora of events including immunosuppression, ovulation, and induction of apoptosis in the membranous sheets between the various digits during gestation6,7 (Figure 2B). Third, there is the fibroblast growth factor family, which is important in inducing stem cell proliferation in hematopoiesis and developing the blood islands during embryogenesis.8 Finally, there is the family of Hedgehog (Hh) proteins9 (Figure 2C), which consists of highly similar small, secreted proteins that function in the developing organism, adult physiology, and tumorigenesis. Each of these is discussed in more detail below.
|
Some features unique in biology have been found for the Hh proteins, and therefore, Hh draws considerable attention from the research and medical community. It is particularly fascinating that the mature protein is derived from autocatalytic cleavage (ie, the protein cleaves itself) of a precursor protein, followed by the addition of a cholesterol and a palmitoyl group.10,11 Hh is the only known sterolated protein in the animal kingdom, and Hh proteins are one of the few palmitoylated proteins that are secreted (another example of secreted palmitoylated proteins is the Wnt proteins). Not unexpectedly, the lipophilic moieties limit the diffusion capacity of Hh in the aqueous medium that surrounds cells, leaving the mechanisms by which Hh is distributed throughout tissues subject to fierce debate.
| Discovery of the Hh Mutant in Drosophila melanogaster and New Homologs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1993, a joint effort of 3 research groups (from the laboratories of McMahon, Tabin, and Mohler) resulted in reporting of the first vertebrate Hh genes.13,14 Echelard et al14 (and personal communication with Y. Echelard, PhD, 2003) used the cloned fruit fly Hh to identify 3 genes homologous to fruit fly Hh in mouse and chicken. As shown in Figure 3, these homologs were comically termed Sonic Hh (after a Sega arcade game character introduced in 1990), Desert Hh (after an Egyptian species of hedgehog, Hemiechinus auritus), and Indian Hh (after a hedgehog species endemic to the Indian peninsula, Hemiechinus micropus). The name Sonic Hh (Shh) was proposed by Robert Riddle and Randy Johnson, for it seemed to be the "all powerful" of the Hh homologs, just like Sonic the Hedgehog is all powerful in the arcade game of the same name. Although the playful nomenclature for the Hh homologs testifies to geneticists sense of humor, the number of Hh species with which to name Hh homologs appears to be depleted. One research group has now chosen to use "quahog" as homolog name15 in nematodes, and in fish, "Tiggy-Winkle" Hh is known.16 Although the above-mentioned proteins were found to share great homology, they did not colocalize in the developing organism, and it appears they have varying functions regardless of their similarity.
|
| Transduction of the Hh Signal to its Targets |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The primary receptor for Hh is the 12-transmembrane protein Patched17 (Ptc). A second receptor, a 7-transmembrane protein called Smoothened18 (Smo), actually transduces the signal. Smo is constitutively active in nature but is actively kept in a dormant state by the primary receptor Ptc in normal cells. On binding of Hh to Ptc, however, Ptc is internalized, and apparently this is sufficient to alleviate the inhibitory effect of Ptc on Smo, which then activates the Hh pathway.19 The exact mechanism of Smo inhibition by Ptc is still elusive, but it is a catalytic mechanism (ie, a single Ptc molecule can inhibit multiple Smo molecules), and Ptc and Smo do not need to bind or colocalize.20 Strong homology exists between Ptc and some bacterial transporter molecules, as well as the Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1) protein, a transport protein involved in cholesterol homeostasis in humans.21 This homology gave rise to the concept that in the absence of Hh, Ptc translocates a compound to the extracellular compartment, where it binds to and inhibits Smo.20 This inhibitory molecule probably resembles various compounds already known to inhibit Smo by direct binding, such as cyclopamine.22,23
Downstream of Smo, the signal transduction cascade remains complex and only partly understood. Moreover, it is becoming increasingly clear that many mechanisms elucidated in fruit fly differ from their vertebrate counterparts.24 Figure 4 shows a summarized scheme of the known components involved in the Hh pathway. In the absence of Hh, when Ptc is actively repressing Smo, the downstream Gli transcription factors are somehow inhibited from activating transcription of target genes. Only when Hh binds to Ptc is the inhibition of Smo alleviated and the Gli transcription factors allowed to exert their transcriptional activities. In vertebrates, at least 3 different Gli transcription factors exist, and these differ in their preferential regulatory action.2527 Gli3 is known to be bound in a protein complex by action of Fused (Fu, believed not to be essential in vertebrates), Costal2 (Cos2, argued not to be involved in vertebrates), and Suppressor of Fused (SuFu, presumably less important in fruit fly), but for other Gli proteins, this sequestering remains to be established. In this complex, vertebrate Gli3 and the Gli homolog Ci in fruit fly are prone to cleavage that yields a repressor fragment, which localizes to the nucleus and acts as a suppressor on Hh target genes (not shown). Gli1 and Gli2 are considered activators of target gene transcription and are presumably not cleaved.
|
What is the nature of the Hh target genes? Before the microarray technique was used to identify target genes of the Gli transcription factors, the number of targets was rather limited and included hepatic nuclear factor 3-ß, Hox genes, various bone morphogenetic protein morphogens, Ptc, and Hh-interacting protein.9 Owing to the depth of this field, the interested reader would do best to examine the specialist reports on the varied group of Hh target genes.9,2831 Microarray analysis has revealed that Hh target genes include molecules involved in cell cycle, cell adhesion, signal transduction, apoptosis, nerve formation, transcriptional regulators, Wnt signaling antagonists, protease inhibitors, and a metal binding protein, and interestingly, thrombomodulin was found to be upregulated in that study.28 Collectively, these studies suggest a very versatile role for Hh signaling; however, the actual in vivo relevance of these genes remains unclear. More functional studies, especially concerning the potential clinical relevance and the suitability of these genes as therapeutic targets for treating disease, are desirable.
| Function of the Hh Proteins |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After almost 2 decades worth of research, functions of Hh proteins have been found to range from tooth and bone/cartilage development to neuronal development (excellently reviewed by Ingham and McMahon33). In the gastrointestinal tract, Hh plays an important role in developmental patterning and in adult morphostasis. In the developing embryo, Hh also regulates larger structural features such as lateral asymmetry, limb patterning, digit number and orientation, and differentiation and proliferation of muscle precursors. The role of Hh proteins in hematopoietic stem cell proliferation34 and recruitment of these cells via the blood stream to damaged tissues, where these stem cells participate in tissue repair, are both of great interest.35
The importance of proper Hh signaling is stressed by some sterol disorders that affect development. Of these disorders, Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome36 is known to affect the Hh pathway either by improper sterolation of the Hh protein or by reduced responsiveness of cells to Hh,37 and the other sterol disorders are anticipated to act on the Hh pathway in a similar manner. Mutations that affect the activity of Hh proteins cause varying degrees of holoprosencephaly and a range of other abnormal facial features. More common are diseases that result from excessive Hh signaling, most often leading to cancer5 but also to such diseases as Gorlin syndrome. These Hh gain-of-functionrelated diseases can arise from an Smo mutation that renders it insensitive to the inhibitory action of Ptc, or more commonly, to a mutation in Ptc, which cripples its inhibitory action on (functional) Smo.
| Function of the Hh Proteins in Cardiovascular Development |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The development of the heart starts very early in the developing embryo, as progenitor cells in the mesoderm form the primitive cardiac tube. The straight tube then undergoes rightward looping, and subsequently, the atrial and ventricular chambers appear and mature. Owing to the function of Hh proteins in determining left/right asymmetry,42,43 heart tube looping is critically dependent on proper Hh processing.44 In Shh/ mice embryos, numerous defects in cardiac development are seen, which are briefly summarized in the following section.
Although the atrial and ventricular chambers are formed (which suggests completed heart looping) in Shh mutant mice, they differ from wild type in many aspects. For instance, a single common atrium is seen, and a pulmonary valve is absent. The right ventricle is reduced, whereas the left ventricle is extended. Furthermore, the heart is positioned on the left side of the thorax, and the shape of the heart indicates a laterality defect. Surprisingly, although heart looping is delayed and incomplete in these animals, the direction of heart looping is unchanged. In Gli2/,Gli3+/ double-mutant mice (thus lacking 2 of 3 Hh transcription factors), disturbed cardiac development very similar to that found in Shh mutants is observed.45 In Shh and Ihh double mutants and Smo mutants, no heart looping with successive heart development was observed at all. Because these mice are arguably most deficient in Hh signaling, the severe phenotype argues for an absolute requirement for Hh signaling in cardiac development.46 Mice mutant for the inhibitory Hh pathway component SuFu showed inverted heart looping, which indicates that heart looping is not only affected by diminished Hh function but also by aberrantly increased pathway activity.47
Later in cardiac development, cells from the neural fold (neural crest cells) are recruited to form the aortic arches, the cardiac outflow tract, and the proximal great vessels. In addition to the anomalous cardiac development described above, Shh/ mice embryos show defects in neural crest cell localization and increased cell death, which leads to the absence of the ductus arteriosus, abnormal subclavian arteries, and a single midline carotid artery. It is remarkable that Shh signaling is pivotal in 2 different events in cardiac development, and it is testimony to its relevance in the developing organism.
In the previously mentioned patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome, who have a diminished Hh pathway activity, congenital heart disorders are common, including most of the defects found in Shh/ mice.36 Cardiomyogenesis has also been found to be dependent on Hh signaling, and the addition of Hh to P19 pluripotent embryonic teratocarcinoma cells in vitro is able to transform these cells to cardiomyocytes.48 Also, the positioning of cardiac progenitors is regulated by an Hh gradient.49 Many more examples of Hh involvement in cardiovascular development have been described, but more interestingly, it has become clear that Hh signaling remains active during cardiovascular maintenance in the adult.
| Hh in Ischemia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two recent papers by Pola et al30,40 established a strong role for Hh signaling in adult cardiovascular pathophysiology. They showed that Hh mediates a profound upregulation of target genes involved in angiogenesis, which indicates the responsiveness of adult tissue to Hh. Remarkably, vascular endothelial growth factor and the angiopoietins Ang-1 and Ang-2 were simultaneously upregulated in response to Shh, and concomitantly, Shh was found to be a potent inducer of vascularization in a cornea model. After in vitro experiments, the authors found that endothelial cells did not respond to Hh, and, as mentioned above for the developing embryo, this suggests an intermediate action of mesenchymal cells. As previously mentioned, Byrd and coworkers39 confirmed that Hh responsiveness is confined to mesothelial and smooth muscle cells. The authors extended their findings and managed to salvage ischemic hind limbs in mice by injecting Shh in the afflicted muscle. Later, the specificity and mechanism behind this salvage were further elucidated, and the Hh response to ischemia was found to be an endogenously occurring process.40
In an elegant experimental setup, Kusano et al35 recently demonstrated that intramyocardial gene transfer of Shh promoted recovery and preservation of left ventricular function in both acute and chronic myocardial ischemia by enhanced neovascularization and recruitment of bone marrowderived endothelial progenitor cells. Reduced fibrosis and cardiac apoptosis was observed after Shh gene transfer. In this myocardium model, the endogenous role of Shh in ischemia was again confirmed, which suggests that the observed salvage by injection of Shh DNA is not an artificially created situation but rather an augmentation of a naturally occurring phenomenon. The obvious potential of endogenous Hh to induce significant tissue alterations and cell recruitment raises questions as to the involvement of Hh in the development of (rare) angiomyosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, or rhabdomyosarcomas.51
In cerebral ischemia, a positive role for Hh-mimicking molecules has also been shown in limiting the damage caused by artificial vessel occlusion in rats.5252b Together, these data strongly support the notion that Hh aids in the rescue of ischemic tissue, especially in its revascularization. This Hh-dependent revascularization probably reflects a physiological response to ischemic stress, although what exactly drives this Hh response (eg, hypoxia or inflammation) is not yet known. Many signals that are generated in ischemic tissue, ranging from cytokines to acidity, might trigger Hh expression. Also, we do not know which specific areas in the ischemic tissue activate Hh expression, the degree of tissue damage still considered "salvageable" enough for the Hh pathway to function, or whether the complex Hh pathway remains intact in damaged cells
| Lipophorin Transport of the Hh Protein |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atherosclerosis involves deposits of fatty substances, cholesterol, cellular waste products, calcium, and fibrin in the inner lining of medium and larger arteries57 and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease. Because excess cholesterol both initiates and exacerbates atherosclerotic plaque development, LDL has long been considered the "bad" cholesterol carrier because of its role in transporting cholesterol from hepatic to peripheral tissues. However, the transport of Hh by lipophorin leads us to hypothesize that LDL might transport Hh through the mammalian blood stream. If subsequently LDL is incorporated into an atherosclerotic plaque (as suggested in Figure 5), any Hh present on LDL might exert a positive role by inducing revascularization of surrounding tissue (ie, through the formation of collateral vessels) or other functions as summarized in Figure 5. Of course, these suggestions are all hypothetical, because the presence of Hh on mammalian LDL (or other particles) remains to be established.
|
| Future Perspectives |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current problems with RNA stability and delivery, however, pose challenges that preclude application at this time. Before wide-scale injection of Shh protein or DNA would be feasible, problems involving costs and the intricacy of uniformly injecting compounds into the myocardium must be overcome. Although the development of chemically synthesized small-molecule agonists for the Hh pathway may provide a thrust forward, their distribution could prove too systemic in practice. The use of a molecule that specifically recognizes ischemic tissue coupled to an Hh agonist can provide us with a specific, potent, and relatively affordable therapeutic option (resembling the aptamer approach developed for specific targeting of cancer cells61). Targeting Smo rather than Ptc with small molecules (for instance, with purmorphamine) eliminates any Smo-independent effects. Also, this should further enhance specificity and potency, because it eliminates the inhibitory actions on Smo of yet unidentified Smo-inhibitory proteins (Ptc2 is known, for instance,62 but others might arise). The involvement of Hh in enhancing myocardial influx of bone marrowderived progenitor cells was evident from the report by Kusano et al.35 As this naturally occurring population of cells find their way to the damaged myocardium, they could perhaps confer specificity to the action of systemically administered Hh. Of course, this would not be feasible when Hh is, in fact, the recruiting factor for these cells. Also, bone marrowderived stem cells have been implicated in tumorigenesis (for instance, in the stomach63), and thus, overly enhanced proliferation of such circulating stem cells might not necessarily prove beneficial in the long run.
In summary, we predict that through intense research efforts, our understanding of Hh pathway mechanisms and the participation of the Hh pathway in cardiovascular development will continue to develop. Together with progress in technologies such as gene therapy and diagnostics, this will aid in applying our knowledge to clinical practice and will offer us a means to combat cardiovascular disease in the adult and the developing child.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Payne RM, Johnson MC, Grant JW, Strauss AW. Toward a molecular understanding of congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1995; 91: 494504.
3. Sokol S, Christian JL, Moon RT, Melton DA. Injected Wnt RNA induces a complete body axis in Xenopus embryos. Cell. 1991; 67: 741752.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hurlstone AF, Haramis AP, Wienholds E, Begthel H, Korving J, Van Eeden F, Cuppen E, Zivkovic D, Plasterk RH, Clevers H. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway regulates cardiac valve formation. Nature. 2003; 425: 633637.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Taipale J, Beachy PA. The Hedgehog and Wnt signalling pathways in cancer. Nature. 2001; 411: 349354.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Zou H, Niswander L. Requirement for BMP signaling in interdigital apoptosis and scale formation. Science. 1996; 272: 738741.[Abstract]
7. Graff JM. Embryonic patterning: to BMP or not to BMP, that is the question. Cell. 1997; 89: 171174.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Risau W, Flamme I. Vasculogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995; 11: 7391.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Bijlsma MF, Spek CA, Peppelenbosch MP. Hedgehog: an unusual signal transducer. Bioessays. 2004; 26: 387394.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Porter JA, Young KE, Beachy PA. Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science. 1996; 274: 255259.
11. Pepinsky RB, Zeng C, Wen D, Rayhorn P, Baker DP, Williams KP, Bixler SA, Ambrose CM, Garber EA, Miatkowski K, Taylor FR, Wang EA, Galdes A. Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 1403714045.
12. Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980; 287: 795801.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Krauss S, Concordet JP, Ingham PW. A functionally conserved homolog of the Drosophila segment polarity gene hh is expressed in tissues with polarizing activity in zebrafish embryos. Cell. 1993; 75: 14311444.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Echelard Y, Epstein DJ, St-Jacques B, Shen L, Mohler J, McMahon JA, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell. 1993; 75: 14171430.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hao L, Mukherjee K, Liegeois S, Baillie D, Labouesse M, Burglin TR. The hedgehog-related gene qua-1 is required for molting in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Dyn. 2006; 235: 14691481.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ekker SC, Ungar AR, Greenstein P, von Kessler DP, Porter JA, Moon RT, Beachy PA. Patterning activities of vertebrate hedgehog proteins in the developing eye and brain. Curr Biol. 1995; 5: 944955.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Marigo V, Davey RA, Zuo Y, Cunningham JM, Tabin CJ. Biochemical evidence that patched is the Hedgehog receptor. Nature. 1996; 384: 176179.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. van den Heuvel M, Ingham PW. Smoothened encodes a receptor-like serpentine protein required for hedgehog signalling. Nature. 1996; 382: 547551.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Kalderon D. Transducing the hedgehog signal. Cell. 2000; 103: 371374.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Taipale J, Cooper MK, Maiti T, Beachy PA. Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature. 2002; 418: 892897.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Davies JP, Chen FW, Ioannou YA. Transmembrane molecular pump activity of Niemann-Pick C1 protein. Science. 2000; 290: 22952298.
22. Chen JK, Taipale J, Cooper MK, Beachy PA. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened. Genes Dev. 2002; 16: 27432748.
23. Frank-Kamenetsky M, Zhang XM, Bottega S, Guicherit O, Wichterle H, Dudek H, Bumcrot D, Wang FY, Jones S, Shulok J, Rubin LL, Porter JA. Small-molecule modulators of Hedgehog signaling: identification and characterization of Smoothened agonists and antagonists. J Biol. 2002; 1: 10.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Varjosalo M, Li SP, Taipale J. Divergence of hedgehog signal transduction mechanism between Drosophila and mammals. Dev Cell. 2006; 10: 177186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ruiz I, Altaba A. Gli proteins encode context-dependent positive and negative functions: implications for development and disease. Development. 1999; 126: 32053216.[Abstract]
26. Ruiz I, Altaba A. Gli proteins and Hedgehog signaling: development and cancer. Trends Genet. 1999; 15: 418425.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Koebernick K, Pieler T. Gli-type zinc finger proteins as bipotential transducers of Hedgehog signaling. Differentiation. 2002; 70: 6976.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Ingram WJ, Wicking CA, Grimmond SM, Forrest AR, Wainwright BJ. Novel genes regulated by Sonic Hedgehog in pluripotent mesenchymal cells. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 81968205.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kato M, Seki N, Sugano S, Hashimoto K, Masuho Y, Muramatsu M, Kaibuchi K, Nakafuku M. Identification of sonic hedgehog-responsive genes using cDNA microarray. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001; 289: 472478.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Pola R, Ling LE, Silver M, Corbley MJ, Kearney M, Blake Pepinsky R, Shapiro R, Taylor FR, Baker DP, Asahara T, Isner JM. The morphogen Sonic hedgehog is an indirect angiogenic agent upregulating two families of angiogenic growth factors. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 706711.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Yoon JW, Kita Y, Frank DJ, Majewski RR, Konicek BA, Nobrega MA, Jacob H, Walterhouse D, Iannaccone P. Gene expression profiling leads to identification of GLI1-binding elements in target genes and a role for multiple downstream pathways in GLI1-induced cell transformation. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 55485555.
32. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Tabin C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell. 1993; 75: 14011416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Ingham PW, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 30593087.
34. Bhardwaj G, Murdoch B, Wu D, Baker DP, Williams KP, Chadwick K, Ling LE, Karanu FN, Bhatia M. Sonic hedgehog induces the proliferation of primitive human hematopoietic cells via BMP regulation. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2: 172180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Kusano KF, Pola R, Murayama T, Curry C, Kawamoto A, Iwakura A, Shintani S, Ii M, Asai J, Tkebuchava T, Thorne T, Takenaka H, Aikawa R, Goukassian D, von Samson P, Hamada H, Yoon YS, Silver M, Eaton E, Ma H, Heyd L, Kearney M, Munger W, Porter JA, Kishore R, Losordo DW. Sonic hedgehog myocardial gene therapy: tissue repair through transient reconstitution of embryonic signaling. Nat Med. 2005; 11: 11971204.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Kelley RI, Hennekam RC. The Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. J Med Genet. 2000; 37: 321335.
37. Cooper MK, Wassif CA, Krakowiak PA, Taipale J, Gong R, Kelley RI, Porter FD, Beachy PA. A defective response to Hedgehog signaling in disorders of cholesterol biosynthesis. Nat Genet. 2003; 33: 508513.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Byrd N, Grabel L. Hedgehog signaling in murine vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2004; 14: 308313.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Byrd N, Becker S, Maye P, Narasimhaiah R, St-Jacques B, Zhang X, McMahon J, McMahon A, Grabel L. Hedgehog is required for murine yolk sac angiogenesis. Development. 2002; 129: 361372.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Pola R, Ling LE, Aprahamian TR, Barban E, Bosch-Marce M, Curry C, Corbley M, Kearney M, Isner JM, Losordo DW. Postnatal recapitulation of embryonic hedgehog pathway in response to skeletal muscle ischemia. Circulation. 2003; 108: 479485.
41. Kusano KF, Allendoerfer KL, Munger W, Pola R, Bosch-Marce M, Kirchmair R, Yoon YS, Curry C, Silver M, Kearney M, Asahara T, Losordo DW. Sonic hedgehog induces arteriogenesis in diabetic vasa nervorum and restores function in diabetic neuropathy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 21022107.
42. Levin M, Johnson RL, Stern CD, Kuehn M, Tabin C. A molecular pathway determining left-right asymmetry in chick embryogenesis. Cell. 1995; 82: 803814.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Meyers EN, Martin GR. Differences in left-right axis pathways in mouse and chick: functions of FGF8 and SHH. Science. 1999; 285: 403406.
44. Tsukui T, Capdevila J, Tamura K, Ruiz-Lozano P, Rodriguez-Esteban C, Yonei-Tamura S, Magallon J, Chandraratna RA, Chien K, Blumberg B, Evans RM, Belmonte JC. Multiple left-right asymmetry defects in Shh(-/-) mutant mice unveil a convergence of the shh and retinoic acid pathways in the control of Lefty-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 1137611381.
45. Kim PC, Mo R, Hui Cc C. Murine models of VACTERL syndrome: role of sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. J Pediatr Surg. 2001; 36: 381384.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Zhang XM, Ramalho-Santos M, McMahon AP. Smoothened mutants reveal redundant roles for Shh and Ihh signaling including regulation of L/R asymmetry by the mouse node. Cell. 2001; 105: 781792.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Cooper AF, Yu KP, Brueckner M, Brailey LL, Johnson L, McGrath JM, Bale AE. Cardiac and CNS defects in a mouse with targeted disruption of suppressor of fused. Development. 2005; 132: 44074417.
48. Gianakopoulos PJ, Skerjanc IS. Hedgehog signaling induces cardiomyogenesis in P19 cells. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 2102221028.
49. Liu J, Qian L, Wessells RJ, Bidet Y, Jagla K, Bodmer R. Hedgehog and RAS pathways cooperate in the anterior-posterior specification and positioning of cardiac progenitor cells. Dev Biol. 2006; 290: 373385.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. van den Brink GR, Hardwick JC, Tytgat GN, Brink MA, Ten Kate FJ, Van Deventer SJ, Peppelenbosch MP. Sonic hedgehog regulates gastric gland morphogenesis in man and mouse. Gastroenterology. 2001; 121: 317328.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Hahn H, Wojnowski L, Zimmer AM, Hall J, Miller G, Zimmer A. Rhabdomyosarcomas and radiation hypersensitivity in a mouse model of Gorlin syndrome. Nat Med. 1998; 4: 619622.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Briscoe J, Therond P. Hedgehog signaling: from the Drosophila cuticle to anti-cancer drugs. Dev Cell. 2005; 8: 143151.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Therond P. Planar long range movement of Hedgehog in epitheliums. Presented at the 45th Karolinska Institutet Nobel Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, August 2224, 2004.
52. Briscoe J. Graded Hedgehog signalling and the specification of neural cell fate. Presented at the 45th Karolinska Institutet Nobel Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, August 2224, 2004.
53. Feng J, White B, Tyurina OV, Guner B, Larson T, Lee HY, Karlstrom RO, Kohtz JD. Synergistic and antagonistic roles of the Sonic hedgehog N- and C-terminal lipids. Development. 2004; 131: 43574370.
54. Tanaka Y, Okada Y, Hirokawa N. FGF-induced vesicular release of Sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid in leftward nodal flow is critical for left-right determination. Nature. 2005; 435: 172177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Panakova D, Sprong H, Marois E, Thiele C, Eaton S. Lipoprotein particles are required for Hedgehog and Wingless signalling. Nature. 2005; 435: 5865.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Van Hoof D, Rodenburg KW, Van der Horst DJ. Insect lipoprotein follows a transferrin-like recycling pathway that is mediated by the insect LDL receptor homologue. J Cell Sci. 2002; 115: 40014012.
57. Orford JL, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Popma JJ, Rogers C. The comparative pathobiology of atherosclerosis and restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 6H11H.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Lowrey JA, Stewart GA, Lindey S, Hoyne GF, Dallman MJ, Howie SE, Lamb JR. Sonic hedgehog promotes cell cycle progression in activated peripheral CD4(+) T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2002; 169: 18691875.
59. Stewart GA, Lowrey JA, Wakelin SJ, Fitch PM, Lindey S, Dallman MJ, Lamb JR, Howie SE. Sonic hedgehog signaling modulates activation of and cytokine production by human peripheral CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 2002; 169: 54515457.
60. McCarthy MJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Jones L, London NJ, Bell PR, Naylor AR, Brindle NP. Angiogenesis and the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: an association between symptomatology and plaque morphology. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30: 261268.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Farokhzad OC, Cheng J, Teply BA, Sherifi I, Jon S, Kantoff PW, Richie JP, Langer R. Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 63156320.
62. Motoyama J, Takabatake T, Takeshima K, Hui C. Ptch2, a second mouse Patched gene, is co-expressed with Sonic hedgehog. Nat Genet. 1998; 18: 104106.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Houghton J, Stoicov C, Nomura S, Rogers AB, Carlson J, Li H, Cai X, Fox JG, Goldenring JR, Wang TC. Gastric cancer originating from bone marrow-derived cells. Science. 2004; 306: 15681571.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-K. Kim, V. Meliton, K. W. Park, C. Hong, P. Tontonoz, P. Niewiadomski, J. A. Waschek, S. Tetradis, and F. Parhami Negative Regulation of Hedgehog Signaling by Liver X Receptors Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 23(10): 1532 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Omenetti, Y Popov, Y Jung, S S Choi, R P Witek, L Yang, K D Brown, D Schuppan, and A M Diehl The hedgehog pathway regulates remodelling responses to biliary obstruction in rats Gut, September 1, 2008; 57(9): 1275 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Bijlsma, P. J. A. Leenders, B. J. A. Janssen, M. P. Peppelenbosch, H. ten Cate, and C. A. Spek Endogenous Hedgehog Expression Contributes to Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Injury Experimental Biology and Medicine, August 1, 2008; 233(8): 989 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. van den Brink Hedgehog Signaling in Development and Homeostasis of the Gastrointestinal Tract Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1343 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |