| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;114:583-590.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Molecular Cardiology |
From the Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease (A.M.A., I.F.C.), San Francisco, Calif, and Cardiovascular Research Institute (I.F.C.), Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.
Correspondence to Israel F. Charo, MD, PhD, Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, 1650 Owens St, San Francisco, CA 94158. E-mail icharo{at}gladstone.ucsf.edu
Received February 15, 2006; revision received May 5, 2006; accepted May 30, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results To examine the role of CXCL16 in plaque formation, we created CXCL16-deficient mice (CXCL16/) and bred them with mice deficient in the LDL receptor (LDLR/). In vitro, macrophages from CXCL16/ mice have a significant reduction in the capacity to bind and internalize OxLDL. We found that CXCL16//LDLR/ mice have accelerated atherosclerosis, enhanced macrophage recruitment to the aortic arch, and more abundant mRNA for monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and tumor necrosis factor-
.
Conclusions These data suggest that scavenger receptor activity mediated by CXCL16 in vivo is atheroprotective, and they contrast with studies that document protection from atherosclerosis in scavenger receptor class A- and CD36-deficient mice.
Key Words: atherosclerosis leukocytes lipids chemokines
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 590
CXCL16/SR-PSOX (henceforth referred to as CXCL16) is expressed on endothelial and smooth muscle cells,12 as well as on macrophages9 and dendritic cells.11 It has been identified in human carotid endarterectomy samples13 and in lesions of ApoE-null mice fed a Western diet,14 which suggests a role in atherogenesis. CXCL16 is expressed in 2 distinct forms. Membrane-bound CXCL16 consists of a C-terminal chemokine domain atop a glycosylated mucinlike stalk with a single helical transmembrane domain.10,11 In this configuration, CXCL16 promotes firm adhesion of cells expressing its cognate receptor, known as CXCR6.15 Human CXCL16 also mediates the binding and internalization of bacteria16 and OxLDL.9
Proteolytic cleavage of membrane-bound CXCL16 results in the release of soluble CXCL16,17,18 which acts as a chemoattractant for CXCR6+ cells. In humans and mice, CXCR6+ cells represent a highly polarized T helper 1 T-cell compartment,19,20 and lymphocytes expressing CXCR6 are enriched in chronically inflamed tissues, such as rheumatoid synovium and inflamed liver.20 As a soluble protein, CXCL16 may promote the directed migration of effector T cells to atherosclerotic lesions, a key process in the development of the proatherogenic inflammatory response.
To investigate the role of CXCL16 in atherosclerosis, we generated CXCL16/ mice, crossed them with mice deficient in the LDL receptor (LDLR/ mice), and quantified lesion development after placing the offspring on a diet. Unexpectedly, we found that CXCL16//LDLR/ mice had accelerated atherosclerosis and increased macrophage recruitment to the aortic arch compared with CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ controls, despite the fact that macrophages from CXCL16/ mice had markedly reduced scavenger receptor activity for OxLDL. We found no differences in the ability of macrophages from CXCL16/ mice to bind high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or phagocytose apoptotic cells. Thus, the present data indicate that CXCL16 is atheroprotective and, in the context of a recent study of SR-A- and CD36-deficient mice that shows similar results,21 suggest that scavenger receptor activity does not contribute to atherosclerosis and may in fact be atheroprotective.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The CXCL16 targeting vector was linearized with NotI, electroporated into RF8 embryonic stem (ES) cells, and selected with G418 and FIAU as described previously.23 Colonies were screened by PCR with primers located within the neo cassette and downstream of the 3' targeting arm (5'-TCGCCTTCTATCGCCTTCTTG-3' and 5'-CAATAACCGCCTCTTTCCACC-3'). The resulting amplicon was 4032 bp in correctly targeted clones and recombination was confirmed by Southern blotting of XmaI-digested genomic DNA.
Mice
CXCL16-null mice (CXCL16/) were backcrossed 5 generations (N5) onto the C57BL/6 genetic background, achieving 96.87% C57BL/6 as determined by MAX-BAX marker-assisted backcrossing analysis (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass). Subsequent mating with fully backcrossed LDLR-null mice (LDLR/) (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Me) generated CXCL16//LDLR/ double knockouts. CXCL16+//LDLR/ mice were crossed to generate littermate controls for all experiments.
Mice were weaned at 21 days of age and fed a chow diet for 14 additional days. They were then fed a high-fat, cholate-free diet containing 1.25% (wt/wt) cholesterol (D12108, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ). Mice were matched for gender in each control and experimental group for all atherosclerosis and mRNA analyses.
Atherosclerosis Analysis
The extent of atherosclerosis was quantified in the aortic arch and the aortic root by digital morphometry without knowledge of the genotype, as described previously.24 The aortic arch was taken as the region 3 mm inferior to the branch point of the left subclavian artery to the heart.
Lipid Analysis
Plasma samples were collected by cardiac puncture at the time the animals were euthanized. Total cholesterol analysis and size fractionation of lipoprotein particles was performed as described previously.25
Real-Time PCR
Quantitation of mRNA was determined by TaqMan (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif) real-time PCR with the cyclophilin gene as an internal control as described previously.25 The sequences for CXCR6 were 5'-CCCTTTTGGGCCTATGCAG-3' (forward), 5'-ATGCCTCGAAGAGTTTTGCAC-3' (reverse), 5'-6-FAM-CACCTATGAGTGGGTCTTTGGCACAGTCA-BHQ-1-3' (probe), CXCL16, 5'-TGACCTCGTCCCAACAAGCT-3' (forward), 5'-CGCAAGAGACAAGGGTCCAA-3' (reverse), and 5'-6-FAM-AGAAGCCGCAGATGAGGCGGG-BHQ-1-3' (probe). The monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 probe set was purchased as predeveloped assay reagents from Applied Biosystems. The CD68 and tumor necrosis factor-
primers and probe were identical to published sequences.26,27 cDNA (2 µL) was amplified for all control and experimental reactions.
Scavenger Receptor Assay
Thioglycolate-elicited macrophages were harvested from wild-type or CXCL16/ mice by peritoneal lavage with ice-cold Ca+-free phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were resuspended in minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and seeded at a density of 1x106 cells/well in a 48-well plate. After 2 hours, the medium was replaced to remove nonadherent cells, and the attached macrophages were cultured for an additional 48 hours. Scavenger receptor activity was determined by the method of Teusper et al.28 Nonspecific uptake was found to be &7% of the total cell-associated 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI)-LDL.
Immunohistochemistry
Visualization of CXCL16 and macrophages in the aortic root was performed with a tyramide amplification plus kit (Perkin Elmer, Boston, Mass) as described previously.24 Primary biotinylated CXCL16 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn) was incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody and visualized with rhodamine tyramide reagent.
Apoptosis Analysis
Apoptotic cells were identified in the aortic sinus by TUNEL staining with an in situ death detection kit (Roche). Hearts were removed and maintained in formalin buffer for 4 to 5 hours before equilibration in 20% sucrose to completely fix the samples. To quantify apoptotic cells, 9- to 10-µm sections of each heart centered on the orifice of the left coronary artery were incubated in 0.1% Triton X-100/0.1 mol/L citric acid for 2 minutes on ice before staining.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical differences between experimental groups were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney nonparametric U test. Probability values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
CXCL16 Is Highly Expressed in the Aortic Arch
To determine whether CXCL16 was expressed in the aortic arch under atherogenic conditions, LDLR/ mice were fed either a chow or Western diet for 4 or 8 weeks, and the aortas were analyzed for CXCL16 mRNA by real-time PCR. At 4 weeks, CXCL16 mRNA was 52% more abundant in mice fed the Western diet than in those fed chow (P=0.0002; Figure 2). At 8 weeks, mice fed the Western diet had 150% more CXCL16 mRNA than mice fed the same diet for 4 weeks (P<0.0001); however, mice fed the chow diet showed no increase in the amount of CXCL16 mRNA during this time period. Given these data, we determined that CXCL16 mRNA is highly induced in atherosclerosis-prone areas of the aorta under hypercholesterolemic conditions and that time points of 6 and 10 weeks were optimal for subsequent analysis in the LDLR/ mouse model. Serial sections of the aortic root stained with anti-CXCL16 and MOMA-2 antibodies revealed that the primary cells expressing CXCL16 in the lesion were macrophage foam cells (Figure 3).
|
|
Scavenger Receptor Activity of CXCL16
To determine whether murine CXCL16 had detectable scavenger receptor activity in vivo, we measured DiI-OxLDL uptake in macrophages from CXCL16/ mice. Overall, macrophages from CXCL16/ mice had significantly less OxLDL uptake than wild-type controls (Figure 4). At a concentration of 40 µg/mL DiI-OxLDL, macrophages from CXCL16/ mice had &34% less cell-associated DiI-OxLDL than wild-type mice (Figure 4), which indicates that CXCL16 mediates a significant portion of OxLDL uptake in vivo.
|
CXCL16//LDLR/ Mice Have Accelerated Atherosclerosis Progression
To assess the role of CXCL16 in atherosclerosis, we crossed CXCL16/ mice with LDLR/ mice and placed CXCL16// LDLR/ and CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ littermates on a Western diet for 6 or 10 weeks. There were no significant differences in total cholesterol or weight between CXCL16//LDLR/ and CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice (Tables 1 and 2
). Analysis of lipoprotein profiles for CXCL16//LDLR/ and CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice showed indistinguishable particle size distributions after 6 or 10 weeks on the Western diet (data not shown).
|
|
To quantify lesion progression, en face analysis was performed. After 6 weeks, average lesion sizes were 46% larger in CXCL16//LDLR/ mice than in CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice (P=0.025; Figure 5A). After 10 weeks, CXCL16//LDLR/ mice had an average lesion size 27% larger than CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice (P=0.025). Very similar results were obtained when serial sections of the aortic root were stained with oil red O. At the 10-week time point, lesion size was 56% larger in the CXCL16//LDLR/ mice than in controls (Figure 5C).
|
To determine whether macrophage recruitment was enhanced in CXCL16//LDLR/ mice, CD68 mRNA was quantified in the aortic arch. At 10 weeks, the level of CD68 mRNA was 44% greater in CXCL16//LDLR/ mice than in littermate controls (P=0.002; Figure 6A). Taken together, these data show that the absence of CXCL16 results in acceleration of atherosclerosis and enhanced macrophage recruitment to the aortic arch.
|
CXCR6+ Cell Recruitment to Lesions in CXCL16//LDLR/ Mice
To determine whether CXCR6+ cells are recruited to atherosclerosis-prone areas of the aorta under hypercholesterolemic conditions and whether the absence of CXCL16 affects the migration of these cells, we quantified CXCR6 mRNA in the aortic arch. CXCR6 mRNA was 123% more abundant in CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice from 6 to 10 weeks on the Western diet (P=0.032; Figure 6B). There was a trend toward a decrease in the abundance of CXCR6 mRNA in CXCL16//LDLR/ versus CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice at 10 weeks, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.3). The total number of T cells, as determined by mRNA for CD3, did not differ between CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ and CXCL16//LDLR/ mice (data not shown).
Apoptotic Bodies in Lesions of CXCL16/ Mice
SR-PSOX was initially identified by expression cloning based on binding to phosphatidylserine-coated plates.9 Because apoptotic cells express high levels of phosphatidylserine on their surface, we hypothesized that CXCL16/ mice might be impaired in their ability to phagocytose apoptotic cells. In agreement with Harada et al,29 who observed an average of 1 TUNEL-positive cell per section in the aortic roots of LDLR-deficient mice fed a Western diet for 3.5 months, lesions from CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ and CXCL16//LDLR/ mice exhibited few cells with evidence of DNA fragmentation (Figure 7A). However, CXCL16//LDLR/ mice contained 80% more apoptotic cells (P=0.026) throughout the plaque than CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ controls (Figure 7B).
|
Increased Inflammation in CXCL16/ Mice
We used real-time PCR to quantify mRNA for MCP-1 and tumor necrosis factor-
. The expression of these cytokines after 10 weeks was increased by 264% (P=<0.0001; Figure 8A) and 76% (P=0.006; Figure 8B), respectively, in CXCL16////LDLR/ mice compared with controls. No significant differences between CXCL16//LDLR/ and CXCL16+/+/LDLR/ mice were seen for interferon-
, interleukin-10, or transforming growth factor-ß1 (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although human SR-PSOX/CXCL16 had been shown to bind OxLDL,9 it was not known whether this function was shared by the murine homolog. Here, we report a decrease in Cu2+-OxLDL binding and internalization of &34% in macrophages from CXCL16/mice compared with wild-type controls. This result closely approximates the values obtained in SR-A-deficient macrophages,3 which suggests that a significant portion of SR-A-independent accumulation of OxLDL is mediated by CXCL16.
In addition to its role as a scavenger receptor, CXCL16 functions as a chemokine and adhesion receptor for CXCR6+ cells.10,11 We observed a trend towards reduced abundance of CXCR6+ mRNA in the aortic arch of CXCL16//LDLR/ mice. These results suggest that CXCL16 contributes, along with other chemokines such as CXCL9 (Mig) and CXCL10 (IP-10),30 to the recruitment of activated T cells to lesions. However, despite the relative reduction in the presence of potentially proatherogenic CXCR6+ T cells, atherosclerotic lesions in CXCL16//LDLR/ mice were larger than in littermate controls.
The strong cell-surface expression of CXCL16 on macrophages in the plaque, combined with its high avidity for phosphatidylserine, prompted us to consider whether the atheroprotective role of CXCL16 was due to the binding and clearance of apoptotic cells, which are proatherogenic, from the lesion.31,32 Our finding of increased numbers of apoptotic cells in the atheroma of CXCL16/ mice was consistent with such a mechanism, but macrophages from wild-type and CXCL16/ mice bound and internalized apoptotic thymocytes equally well in both in vitro and in vivo assays (data not shown). These data suggest that clearance of apoptotic cells is not a major function of CXCL16.
The role of scavenger receptors in foam cell formation and atherogenesis is controversial. Mice deficient in SR class B type I have severely accelerated occlusive atherosclerotic disease,33 and it has been proposed that the hepatic uptake of HDL cholesterol mediated by this receptor is atheroprotective.34 We considered the possibility that CXCL16 might be playing a similar role but found no difference in HDL binding in macrophages from CXCL16/ mice compared with wild-type controls (data not shown). In vitro OxLDL uptake assays do not address the possibility that in vivo, soluble CXCL16 might bind to OxLDL and block its uptake by other scavenger receptors; however, saturating levels of recombinant CXCL16 had no effect on OxLDL binding and accumulation (data not shown). Given our failure to detect differences in phagocytosis of apoptotic cells or HDL binding in CXCL16/ macrophages, we hypothesize that the atheroprotection conferred by CXCL16 is due to its scavenger receptor activity.
In vitro experiments have shown that SR-A and CD36, the 2 most thoroughly characterized scavenger receptors, are responsible for the majority of Cu2+-oxidized LDL uptake. Macrophages from SR-A//CD36/ double-knockout mice have a 75% to 90% reduction in uptake of oxidized lipids and an almost complete absence of cholesterol ester formation.35 Early in vivo experiments with mice deficient in either SR-A or CD36 appeared to validate the hypothesis that the uptake of modified lipids by scavenger receptors is proatherogenic, with reductions in lesion sizes of 60% and 23% reported in SR-A/ mice on the ApoE/36 and LDLR/37 backgrounds, respectively. Similar to results obtained for SR-A, dramatic decreases in lesion size at the aortic sinus (70% to 80%) were observed in CD36//ApoE/ mice5 and irradiated ApoE/ mice reconstituted with CD36//ApoE/ bone marrow.38 Recently, Moore et al21 have reexamined this question and found either no protection against or in some cases frank exacerbation of atherosclerosis in SR-A//ApoE/ and CD36//ApoE/ mice, despite profound reductions in the in vitro uptake of oxidized lipids. The authors postulated that mixed 129/C57BL6 genetic backgrounds present in the earlier studies confounded the results and led to misinterpretation of the role of scavenger receptors in atherosclerotic lesion formation. In the present study, using LDLR/ mice extensively backcrossed onto C57BL6, we find that the absence of CXCL16 significantly increase increases lesion size and the abundance of inflammatory cytokines.
These data support the notion that scavenger receptor activity is potentially atheroprotective; however, details concerning the mechanism are unclear. It was postulated by Moore et al21 and in a related commentary39 that nonreceptor-mediated accumulation of native LDL by aggregation, Fc-mediated binding, and/or macropinocytosis might account for the formation of foam cells and lesion development in the absence of SR-A or CD36. The uptake of aggregated native LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor pathway,40 and thus, the present findings in LDLR/ mice suggest that increased lesion formation occurs in the absence of both CXCL16 scavenger receptor activity and internalization of aggregated LDL. We also observed no differences in the plasma levels of immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M antibodies to Cu2+-OxLDL or malondialdehyde-modified LDL (data not shown). Although it is unclear whether circulating titers accurately reflect the potential of antibodies to coat OxLDL within the vessel wall, it appears that there is no overt compensation in CXCL16//LDLR/ mice to produce excess anti-OxLDL antibodies. The uptake of LDL by fluid-phase macropinocytosis, as described by Kruth et al,41 remains a possible route of scavenger receptor-independent foam cell formation in CXCL16/ mice.
We considered the possibility that genetic deletion of CXCL16 may have altered the expression and function of other scavenger receptors, but the strong induction of cytokines, particularly MCP-1, which is upregulated by vessel wall cells by minimally oxidized LDL,42 suggests that alternate scavenger receptors are not clearing the blood of modified lipids. Moreover, direct measurement of SR-A and CD36 mRNA levels revealed no differences between CXCL16/ and wild-type macrophages (data not shown). It remains possible that CXCL16 specifically mediates the uptake and sequestration of a particularly atherogenic species of lipoprotein that is not present in Cu+2-modified LDL.
Recently, 2 human studies have addressed the correlation of CXCL16 expression in coronary artery disease patients. In the first study, the effect of an alanine-to-valine polymorphism of CXCL16 that is postulated to influence the release of CXCL16 from the cell surface was examined in post-myocardial infarction subjects.43 The results showed that carriers of the polymorphism had more severe coronary artery stenosis. In another analysis, a cohort of stable angina pectoris patients were found to have significantly lower circulating levels of CXCL16 protein than healthy control subjects.44 These patient studies further underscore the link between CXCL16 and coronary artery disease and indicate that CXCL16 may be atheroprotective in the context of human disease.
In summary, we have shown that genetic deletion of the chemokine and scavenger receptor CXCL16 exacerbates atherosclerosis in LDLR/ mice, even though CXCL16/ macrophages exhibit marked reductions in the uptake of oxidized lipids in vitro. Atherosclerotic lesions in CXCL16/ mice have increased numbers of macrophages and apoptotic cells and upregulation of inflammatory cytokine mRNA. These data support the notion that scavenger receptor-mediated clearance of modified lipids is an atheroprotective function and suggest that therapeutic blockade of such receptors might be detrimental to the treatment of the disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was funded in part by NIH grants R01 HL52773-11 and R01 HL63894-05 (to Dr Charo) and F32 HL74514-02 (to Dr Aslanian).
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
regulated chemokine and scavenger receptor expressed in atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 750755.
and TNF-
and shed by the activity of the disintegrin-like metalloproteinase ADAM10. J Immunol. 2004; 172: 63626372.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Smith, B. Halvorsen, K. Otterdal, T. Waehre, A. Yndestad, B. Fevang, W. J. Sandberg, U. M. Breland, S. S. Froland, E. Oie, et al. High levels and inflammatory effects of soluble CXC ligand 16 (CXCL16) in coronary artery disease: down-regulatory effects of statins Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 195 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Meijer, J. Ogink, B. Kreike, D. Nuyten, K. E. de Visser, and E. Roos The Chemokine Receptor CXCR6 and Its Ligand CXCL16 Are Expressed in Carcinomas and Inhibit Proliferation Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 68(12): 4701 - 4708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Okamura, J. M. Lopez-Guisa, K. Koelsch, S. Collins, and A. A. Eddy Atherogenic scavenger receptor modulation in the tubulointerstitium in response to chronic renal injury Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): F575 - F585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Collot-Teixeira, J. Martin, C. McDermott-Roe, R. Poston, and J. L. McGregor CD36 and macrophages in atherosclerosis Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2007; 75(3): 468 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||