(Circulation. 2007;116:I-179 – I-187.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
From the Heart Center, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Jia Li, Division of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8. E-mail jia.li{at}sickkids.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— Oxygen consumption (VO2) was continuously measured using respiratory mass spectrometry for 72 hours after Hybrid (n=6) and Norwood (n=13) procedures. Arterial, superior vena cava, and pulmonary venous blood gases and pressures were measured at 2- to 4-hour intervals to calculate systemic and pulmonary blood flows (Qs, Qp), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), total pulmonary vascular resistance including pulmonary arterial band or B-T shunt (tPVR), cardiac output (CO), oxygen delivery (DO2), and oxygen extraction ratio (ERO2). Rate-pressure product was calculated as heart ratexsystolic arterial pressure. When compared with the Norwood procedure, the early postoperative Hybrid patients had lower CO, higher SVR, and higher Qp:Qs ratios. In addition, the DO2 and VO2 were both lower in the Hybrids with higher ERO2 and lactate levels. This early postoperative pattern reversed after 48 hours.
Conclusions— Although Hybrid procedure avoids CPB and cardioplegic arrest, the early hemodynamic profile is not superior to the Norwood in terms of cardiac output and control of pulmonary blood flow. These data strongly suggest that a "hands off" approach to postoperative care in Hybrid patients may not be appropriate in patients with preoperative diminished myocardial function; and in such patients a Norwood-derived management strategy (afterload reduction and inotropic support) should be considered.
Key Words: cardiac output cardiopulmonary bypass heart defects, congential hemodynamics oxygen
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have recently developed a novel technique of direct continuous measurement of systemic oxygen consumption (VO2) and intermittent measurement of arterial, pulmonary venous, and superior vena cava blood gases and pressure to assess the hemodynamics and oxygen transport after the Norwood procedure.3,4 Consequently, we have applied this technique to compare these parameters in contemporaneous patients undergoing Hybrid and Norwood procedures.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Intraoperative Procedures
All patients were intubated with cuffed endotracheal tubes (Microcuff-Heidelberg-pediatric, Microcuff GmbH). General anesthesia was maintained with inhaled isoflurane, intravenous fentanyl, and pancuronium bromide. Monitoring catheters and intravascular access was generally the same for both procedures.
Hybrid Procedure
Hybrid procedures were performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. After median sternotomy, the left pulmonary artery was then banded with a 3-mm-long segment of PTFE conduit (3.5 mm diameter, Gore Inc) which was incised lengthwise, wrapped around the pulmonary artery, and then secured with interrupted sutures.5,6 The right pulmonary artery was banded in a similar fashion and the patient was anticoagulated with 150u/kg heparin. To prevent loss of retrograde flow in the aortic arch after stent deployment across the aortic isthmus, a 3.5-mm PTFE shunt was anastomosed from the innominate artery to the main pulmonary artery as previously described.7 The main pulmonary artery was cannulated and a stent (PROTÉGÉ EverFlex Self-Expanding Stent System, ev3 Inc) placed in the ductus arteriosus under fluoroscopic guidance. The location of the stent and confirmation of the pulmonary artery banding was obtained using fluoroscopic imaging to confirm creation of tight band-associated proximal branch pulmonary artery stenoses. Pulmonary vein saturations were obtained before pulmonary artery banding and in the postoperative period through an indwelling catheter in the right upper pulmonary vein. Atrial septostomy and stenting was performed in patients with restrictive atrial septal defects. Dopamine (5 µg/min/kg) was used in 3 patients before the hybrid procedure (Patients 1, 3, and 5) and was discontinued before leaving the catheterization laboratory.
Norwood Procedure
Norwood procedures were performed using low-flow CPB and selective regional cerebral perfusion as described.8 The aortic arch was reconstructed with a homograft patch and a 3.5-mm right modified Blalock-Taussig shunt were used. All patients received methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) before CPB. Phenoxybenzamine (0.25 mg/kg) was given at initiation of CPB. Aprotinin 50 000 KIU/kg was given followed by 100 000 KIU/100 mL prime. Milrinone (100 µg/kg) was administered before termination of CPB and dopamine (5 µg/kg/min) on cessation of CPB. Pulmonary venous lines and superior vena cava oximetric sampling lines were placed.
Postoperative Management Strategy for Norwood and Hybrid Patients
Temperature was maintained between 36°C and 37°C. Sedation consisted of a continuous infusion of morphine and lorazepam as required. Pancuronium was given for muscle relaxation. Patients received time-cycled pressure control/pressure support ventilation. Arterial oxygen saturation was maintained between 70% to 85%. Hemoglobin was maintained between 14 to 16 mg/dL. For the Norwood patients, inotropes (dopamine), vasoactive drugs (milrinone, phenoxybenzamine and vasopressin), and volume infusions (5% albumin or blood) were administered according to a standard protocol.9 For the Hybrid patients, inotropes and vasoactive drugs were used when felt to be clinically indicated, typically on the basis of low superior vena cava oxygen saturations or low blood pressure.
Methods of Measurements
Patient Monitoring
All patients had continuous monitoring of systemic, superior vena caval, and pulmonary venous pressures, heart rates, and temperature.
Oxygen Consumption
VO2 was measured continuously using an AMIS2000 respiratory mass spectrometer (Innovision A/S). This is a sensitive and accurate method for continuous gas analysis that allows simultaneous measurements of multiple gas fractions.10
Calculations of Hemodynamics and Oxygen Transport
Blood samples were taken from the arterial line, superior vena cava, and pulmonary vein lines for the measurements of blood gases and oxygen saturation. Qp and Qs were calculated using the direct Fick method. Total cardiac output (CO), systemic oxygen delivery (DO2), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), total pulmonary vascular resistance inclusive of the Blalock-Taussig shunt in the Norwood procedure or PA bands in the Hybrid procedure (tPVR), and oxygen extraction ratio (ERO2) were calculated. Stroke volume was calculated as CO divided by heart rate. The rate-pressure product was calculated by multiplying the heart rate by the systolic arterial pressure, as an indirect index of myocardial VO211.
Study Protocol
In patients undergoing Hybrid procedures, preoperative measurement of systemic hemodynamics and oxygen transport was made after sternotomy but before pulmonary artery banding and arterial duct stenting. Both groups of patients were studied during the first 72 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Data Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD. A paired t test was used to compare the variables before operation and the first measurements after the arrival in the ICU in Hybrid patients. Mixed linear regression analysis for repeated measures was used to determine the nature of any time trend over the 72-hour study period. It was also used to compare the differences in levels and trends between groups with analysis of the effects of group interaction between time and group. The parameter estimates and probability values of the group effect indicate the difference in the overall levels of each variable between the 2 groups. The parameter estimates and probability values of the interaction of time and group indicate the difference in trends of each variable between the groups. For some measures various transformations of time (logarithmic and polynomial) were tested regarding the best fit for the time course. All data analysis was performed using SAS statistical software version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc).
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hybrid Patients
Patients were extubated between 1 to 8 days after surgery (median 6 days). Milrinone (0.66 to 0.99 µg/kg/min) was used in 4 of 6 the patients in the early postoperative period. Phenoxybenzamine (1.0 to 1.5 mg/d per kg) was administered in 1 patient (Patient 5) at 14 hours after the arrival in the ICU and terminated after 72 hours. Nitroprusside (2 to 3 µg/kg/min) was used in another patient (Patient 4) from postoperative hours 6 to 28. Dopamine (5 to 10 µg/min per kg) was administered to 3 patients at 6 hours after the procedure and continued for 8 to 30 hours (Patients 1, 2, and 5).
None of the Hybrid patients died during the study period. One patient required atrial stenting after the conclusion of the study period which was complicated by entanglement with tricuspid valve chordae and subsequent reoperation, ECMO, and death. Another patient died on postoperative day 53 after requiring ECMO support for fulminant adenoviral pneumonitis. One patient (Patient 4) who underwent the Hybrid procedure for intended pretransplant palliation was discharged home and returned for successful heart transplantation on postoperative day 60.
Norwood Patients
All patients were extubated between 4 to 16 days after surgery (median 7 days). The duration of intubation was longer in the Norwood patients as compared with the Hybrid patients (11±6 and 5±2 days, respectively, P=0.026). Milrinone (0.33 to 0.99 µg/min/kg) was used in all Norwood patients throughout the study period. Phenoxybenzamine (0.5 to 2.0 mg/d per kg) was commenced within the first 14 hours and continued for the remainder of the study period in all Norwood patients. Vasopressin (0.0001 to 0.0005 U/min/kg) was given in 7 patients at different times during the study period. Dopamine (5 µg/min/kg) was used in 8 of the patients preoperatively and was initiated before the termination of CPB in all patients (5 to 10 µg/kg/min), and subsequently stopped within the first 24 hours after arrival in the ICU in 10 patients, and at 40 to 52 hours in 2 patients, and for the entire study period in the remaining patient. One patient required ECMO support after completion of the study period. There were no in-hospital deaths among the Norwood patients.
Postoperative Profiles of Hemodynamics and Oxygen Transport in Hybrid Patients
Tables 2 and 3
and Figure 1 show the results of the trends of central body temperature, hemodynamics, and oxygen transport in the Hybrid group.
|
|
|
Perioperative Changes in Hemodynamics and Oxygen Transport
Comparison of preoperative and the first postoperative measures on arrival in the ICU showed a significant increase in central temperature (P<0.05) and insignificant increase in heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures (P>0.05). There was a significant increase in SVR (P=0.0001) and tPVR (P<0.0001) and a significant decrease in Qs (P=0.03), Qp (P=0.009) and CO (P=0.009). There was a decrease in the ratio of Qp:Qs, PaO2, and SaO2 although not achieving statistical significance (P>0.05 for all). Hb increased significantly (P<0.0001). DO2 decreased but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.065). VO2 did not change significantly (P=0.48), but ERO2 increased significantly (P=0.008). Arterial lactate increased significantly (P=0.049) (Table 2 and Figure 1).
Postoperative Hemodynamic and Oxygen Transport
Central temperature increased over the 72 hours after arrival in the ICU (P=0.01). All hemodynamic and oxygen transport variables showed substantial interindividual and intraindividual variations over the study period. Heart rate linearly decreased over the study period (P<0.0001). Arterial blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean; P<0.0001 for all) and rate-pressure product increased linearly over time (P<0.0001). SVR was significantly related to time after logarithmic transformation and showed a rapid decrease in the first 24 hours (P<0.0001). tPVR linearly decreased over time (P=0.001). Qs, Qp, CO, and stroke volume increased significantly over time (P<0.0001). There was no significant change in SaO2 (P=0.10), but a significant increase in PaO2 (P=0.01) and a significant decrease in Hb over time (P<0.0001). There was a significant increase in DO2 (P<0.0001) and a small increase in VO2 over time (P<0.0001). As a result, ERO2 decreased and was related to time after logarithmic transformation, decreasing most rapidly in the first 24 hours. Arterial lactate was also related to time after logarithmic transformation; decreasing rapidly in the first 24 hours (Table 3 and Figure 1).
Postoperative Profiles of Hemodynamics and Oxygen Transport in Norwood Patients
Table 4 and Figure 1 show the results of the trends of central body temperature, hemodynamics, and oxygen transport in Norwood groups. The details of the profiles have been described in our previous study.6
|
Comparison of Postoperative Profiles of Hemodynamics and Oxygen Transport Between the Hybrid and the Norwood Procedures
There was no difference in temperature between the 2 groups of patients during the first 72 hours (P=0.97), but the trends were significantly different with a significant interaction between time and group (P=0.01) and a small increase in Hybrid patients but nonsignificant change in the Norwood patients. Heart rate tended to be higher in Hybrid patients (P=0.09) with a similar decreasing trend over time (P=0.22). Systolic arterial pressure tended to be higher in Hybrid patients but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (P=0.29). There was no significant deference in diastolic arterial pressure between the 2 groups (P=0.61) but the Hybrid patients showed a faster increase over the 72 hours (P<0.0001). Thus mean arterial pressure was higher (P=0.03) and increased faster (P<0.0001) in Hybrid patients as compared with the Norwood patients. Rate-pressure product tended to be higher in the Hybrid patients (P=0.063) with similar trends in the two groups (P=0.95) (Table 5 and Figures 1 and 2
).
|
|
SVR was initially higher and more rapidly decreased in Hybrid patients (P<0.0001) reaching a level similar to the Norwood patients after 36 hours. In the Hybrid patients, tPVR increased from 9.6±6.1 to 25.8±6.0 Wood unitxm2 and SVR increased from 21.1±12.2 to 45.8±14.5 Wood unitxm2 (pre- versus postoperative). In contrast, postoperative Norwood tPVR and SVR were 17.7±5.8 and 24.5±14.2 Wood unitxm2 respectively. Qs was initially lower in the Hybrid patients (P<0.001) and increased more rapidly (P<0.0001) to reach a level similar to the Norwood patients at approximately 36 hours and thereafter remained higher than the Norwood patients. There was no significant difference in the levels of tPVR and Qp between the groups, but a faster decrease in tPVR and increase in Qp were noted in the Hybrid patients as compared with the Norwood patients (Figure 1). Qp:Qs was significantly higher (P=0.003) and diminished faster (P<0.0001) in the Hybrid patients as compared with the Norwood patients (Figure 1). Qp:Qs ranged from 0.36 to 5.7 (mean: 1.7±1.0) in the Hybrid patients. Among these values, a Qp:Qs more than 2.0 and less than 3.0 occurred in 17% of the measurements (22 of 132 measurements), and Qp:Qs >3 in 11% (14 measurements) (Figure 2A). In comparison, in the Norwood patients, Qp:Qs ranged from 0.3 to 3.3 (mean: 1.2±0.5), and Qp:Qs >2.0 occurred in 5% of the measurements (16 of 325 measurements), and only 1 measurement was >3.0 (Figure 2B).
CO and stroke volume were lower (P=0.005 and P=0.03, respectively) but with a significantly faster recovery (P<0.0001 for both) in the Hybrid patients and reached a level similar to the Norwood patients after 36 hours and thereafter was greater than the Norwood patients. PaO2 and SaO2 were significantly higher (P=0.002 and P=0.01, respectively) but with a slower increase in Hybrid patients as compared with the Norwood patients (P<0.0001 and P=0.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in Hb between the 2 groups. DO2 was lower (P<0.0001) with a significantly faster recovery (P<0.0001) in the early postoperative Hybrid patients and became higher than the Norwood patients after 48 hours. VO2 was lower (P=0.002), with a rapid increase over the study period in the Hybrid patients. In the Norwood patients, VO2 showed a significant decrease over time in a logarithmic fashion. VO2 was higher in the Hybrid patients at 48 hours. ERO2 was higher throughout the study period (P=0.0008) despite a faster decrease (P=0.002) in Hybrid patients. Arterial lactate was not different between the groups (Figure 1).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Norwood and Hybrid procedures share common objectives. Both are designed to provide unobstructed Qs by aortic arch reconstruction (Norwood) or ductal stenting (Hybrid) and to limit Qp with a modified B-T shunt (Norwood) or bilateral pulmonary artery banding (Hybrid). These maneuvers are designed to stabilize the hemodynamic status of a newborn with hypoplastic left heart syndrome until second stage palliation can be performed. Because achievement of these objectives in the Norwood patients requires CPB, cardioplegic arrest, and some form of altered cerebral perfusion, postoperative instability has been commonly attributed to sequelae of these surgical maneuvers including ischemia-reperfusion injury and the effects of the systemic inflammatory response to CPB (eg, secondary myocardial dysfunction, vasomotor instability, and increased VO2).3,12 Management of the "post-Norwood" circulation has evolved over the past 2 decades with manipulation of the SVR now being seen as an important variable in maintaining adequate Qs and DO2.9,13
By avoiding CPB-associated injury, the Hybrid procedure is hypothesized to lead to a reduced inflammatory response and superior cardiovascular performance in the early postoperative period. In the current study, the "hypermetabolic state" of the postoperative Norwood patient (and patients after CPB in general) is manifest by an elevated early postoperative VO23,10,14,15 and contributes to impaired balance of oxygen transport.3 In contrast, the lower VO2 after Hybrid procedure (possibly attributable to avoidance of CPB) is advantageous as it compensates for the lower DO2 seen in these patients. This benefit, however, was only partial and overall the balance of delivery and consumption (ERO2) in the first 48 postoperative hours was diminished in the Hybrid group.
The observed increased ERO2 in the Hybrid patients suggest limited myocardial reserve. This decrement in myocardial performance may be attributable to a similar hemodynamic burden placed on the right ventricle with either of the 2 operative approaches. Specifically, the construction of modified B-T shunt (in the Norwood procedure) or bilateral pulmonary artery bands imposes an acute pressure load to an already volume loaded single right ventricle. Animal and human data from normal biventricular circulation have shown undesirable responses to pulmonary artery or aortic banding with myocardial injury and reduced contractility,16–18,19,20 The neonatal single right ventricle might be disadvantaged in its ability to respond to acute increase in afterload, resulting in a reduction in total cardiac output. Additionally, acute pressure loading in animal subjects with biventricular circulation has been found to be associated with increased circulating levels of rennin, angiotensin, and catocholamines.21,22 Postoperative elaboration of circulating vasoconstrictors may further increase the SVR after Hybrid (or Norwood) procedures and thereby contribute to reductions in CO and DO2. Thus our "hands off" approach to postoperative Hybrid management may be inappropriate in patients with diminished preoperative myocardial performance.
It is important to note that these postoperative measurements were obtained after intraoperative administration of phenoxybenzamine and milrinone in all of the Norwood patients, whereas intraoperative vasodilators and inotropes were uncommonly used during and after the Hybrid procedures. Consequently, the superior DO2 in the Norwood patients may simply reflect the different management strategy used (eg, inotropic and vasodilatory support) rather than an important deficit in the myocardial function of Hybrid patients. The diminished myocardial performance in the early postoperative Hybrid patients may be related to increased SVR attributable to endogenous release of catecholamines,21,23 which was specifically treated in the Norwood patients (phenoxybenzamine) but not treated in the Hybrid patients. Whereas the inferior myocardial performance in the Hybrid patients did not have overt clinical consequences (mortality, ventilation time, ICU stay), it may be possible to accelerate recovery by manipulation of the adverse hemodynamics (increased SVR and decreased Qs) by use of vasodilator strategies developed for postoperative Norwood patients.
Another important finding in the present study was the relatively high Qp:Qs ratios in the Hybrid patients despite the presence of bilateral pulmonary artery bands. Although this, in part, may be related to the aforementioned elevation of SVR, it is important to note that the presence of bilateral pulmonary artery bands did not eliminate the potential for pulmonary overcirculation with Qp:Qs ratios that frequently exceeded 2.5:1. Consequently, the benefit of the Hybrid procedure may reside in the avoidance of high VO2 states rather than tight control of Qp. Quantitative evaluation of Qp:Qs measurements has not been previously reported, and recognition of this potential for pulmonary overcirculation is important as there are several medical methods at the clinicians disposal to control Qp through ventilatory management and systemic afterload reduction.
Conclusions
Despite the absence of CPB, cardioplegic arrest, and circulatory arrest, the early postoperative Hybrid patient (in whom minimal inotropic or vasodilatory support has been used) has less favorable overall circulatory performance when compared with postoperative Norwood patients in whom inotropic and vasodilatory support is routinely used. Although this early deficit is well-tolerated and rapidly reversed, it suggests that the early postoperative Hybrid patient may undergo a period of limited myocardial reserve and clinical awareness of this pattern of recovery may be of benefit to the clinician—especially in those patients with preoperative deficits in myocardial performance. In patients undergoing a hybrid procedure with known preoperative myocardial dysfunction, the routine use of postoperative inotropic and vasodilatory support (as commonly used after a Norwood procedure) should be strongly considered. In addition, the Qp:Qs can be high in the postoperative Hybrid patients and the presence of bilateral pulmonary artery bands should not be considered as complete protection against pulmonary overcirculation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was funded by Canadian Institute of Health Research and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |