Published online before print August 7, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.609057
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;116:910-916.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology |
Serial Angioscopic Evidence of Incomplete Neointimal Coverage After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation
Comparison With Bare-Metal Stents
From the Cardiovascular Division, Kansai Rosai Hospital (M.A., J.K., M.U., T.M., T.W., T.O., O.I., F.S., S. Nanto, S. Nagata), Amagasaki, Japan, and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine (M.H.), Suita, Japan.
Correspondence to Jun-ichi Kotani, MD, PhD, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871 Japan. E-mail shamallv8{at}aol.com
Received September 21, 2006; accepted June 14, 2007.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— The time course of neointimal formation after stent implantation has not been studied extensively by angioscopy in the drug-eluting stent era.
Methods and Results— Serial angioscopic findings at first follow-up (3.6±1.1 months), second follow-up (10.5±1.6 months), and third follow-up (21.2±2.2 months) after stent implantation were compared between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, n=17) and bare-metal stents (BMS, n=11). Neointimal coverage, thrombus, and presence of yellow plaques underneath the stents were assessed. Neointimal coverage was graded as follows: grade 0, stent struts were fully visible; grade 1, struts bulged into the lumen, although they were covered; grade 2, struts were embedded by the neointima but were seen translucently; or grade 3, struts were fully embedded and invisible. Neointimal coverage was remarkably different between SES and BMS at each follow-up point. Neointimal coverage grade was 1.1±0.5 in SES versus 2.9±0.3 in BMS at the first follow-up (P<0.0001), 1.1±0.5 in SES versus 3.0±0.0 in BMS (P<0.0001) at the second follow-up, and 1.3±0.5 in SES versus 3.0±0.0 in BMS at the third follow-up (P=0.0009). No significant serial changes in coverage grade were noted in the BMS group, whereas coverage grade slightly but significantly increased at the third follow-up in the SES group (P<0.05). Thrombi were detected in 4 SES: a red thrombus was seen from the first to the third follow-up in 2; another was detected only at the third follow-up; and the fourth was seen at the first follow-up but disappeared at the second follow-up, associated with a new white thrombus despite dual antiplatelet therapy. Yellow plaques had disappeared by the time of the second follow-up in BMS. In contrast, yellow plaques were exposed in 71% of SES at the first follow-up and remained exposed until the third follow-up. Neointimal coverage grades correlated with thrombi (P=0.002) and with yellow plaques (P<0.0001).
Conclusions— Serial angioscopic findings up to 2 years after SES implantation were markedly different from those after BMS. Neointimal coverage was completed by 3 to 6 months in BMS. In contrast, SES demonstrated the presence of thrombi and yellow plaques even as much as 2 years after implantation.
Key Words: coronary disease • imaging techniques • stents • thrombus
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have demonstrated a major breakthrough in the reduction of restenosis compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia.1,2 Vascular brachytherapy also inhibits neointimal hyperplasia and thereby reduces restenosis; however, lesions that received vascular brachytherapy showed delayed neointimal hyperplasia, which was related to late stent thrombosis.3–6 Hence, similar to brachytherapy, insufficient neointimal coverage may be prolonged after SES implantation. In fact, several intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies demonstrated the sustained suppression of neointimal hyperplasia more than 1 year after SES implantation.7–9 The suppressed neointimal hyperplasia after SES implantation necessitated in situ evaluation of the extremely thin neointima. Although IVUS is a robust tool for the quantification of neointima, the resolution of IVUS may not be sufficient for measuring the suppressed neointima after SES.10,11
Clinical Perspective p 916
Angioscopy, by using light instead of ultrasound, is a suitable tool for the visualization of lumen/stent surfaces.12–16 Using angioscopy, we have previously reported incomplete neointimal coverage and associated subclinical thrombosis 3 to 6 months after SES implantation,16 but the condition of intravascular surfaces more than 6 months after SES implantation remains unclear. Accordingly, in the present study, we investigated the time course of neointimal morphology using angioscopy as much as 2 years after SES implanted for de novo lesions of the native coronary arteries and compared the findings with BMS.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patients
The study cohort consisted of 17 patients in whom 28 stents had been implanted in de novo native coronary lesions (14 men [82%]; age range 35 to 78 years old). Ten patients were treated with 17 SES (Cypher, Cordis, Miami, Fla), and 8 patients were treated with 11 BMS (5 Bx Velocity, Cordis; 2 Zeta, Guidant Corp, St. Paul, Minn; 2 Express2, Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass; 1 Driver, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn; and 1 Tsunami, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). One patient was treated with both SES and BMS and was included in both groups. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention before August 2004 were treated with BMS alone because SES have only been available since August 2004 in Japan. SES were used after this date unless patients had not tolerated dual antiplatelet therapy (ticlopidine in addition to aspirin). Acute coronary syndrome patients were treated with BMS alone.
Between October 2004 and December 2006, all patients underwent serial coronary angioscopy at the first follow-up (3.6±1.1 months, median 3.1 months) and the second follow-up (10.5±1.6 months, median 10.3 months). In addition, 10 patients (14 SES and 4 BMS) underwent the third follow-up angioscopy (21.2±2.2 months, median 21.5 months). The medical ethics committee at Kansai Rosai Hospital approved the study, and all patients gave written informed consent.
Fourteen patients (82%) had hypertension, 16 (94%) had hyperlipidemia, 11 (65%) had diabetes mellitus, and 7 (41%) were current smokers. Hypertension included 1 or more of the following: antihypertensive medication use, systolic blood pressure 
140 mm Hg, or diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg. Hyperlipidemia included 1 or more of the following: treatment with medication, total cholesterol 220 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol 140 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dL, or triglycerides 150 mg/dL. Diabetes mellitus included 1 or more of the following: oral agent or insulin treatment or hemoglobin A1C >6.5%.
Antiplatelet Regimen
All patients were taking aspirin 100 mg/d. Ticlopidine 200 mg/d was additionally given for at least 3 months after SES and for at least 1 month after BMS implantation. Neither glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors nor clopidogrel was used because they have not been approved for clinical use in Japan.
Angiographic and Angioscopic Follow-Up
Heparin (5000 IU) was administered into the femoral artery via the inserted sheath, and isosorbide dinitrate (2.5 mg) was administered into the coronary artery before the procedure. Angioscopy was performed after coronary angiography with Vecmova (Clinical Supply, Gifu, Japan). Details about the procedure and specifications for these devices have been described elsewhere.15 Briefly, the optical fiber was placed at the distal segment of the coronary artery and was manually pulled back from the distal edge of the stent to the proximal edge under careful angioscopic and angiographic guidance. Angioscopic images consisted of 3000 pixels with full color and were stored on digital videotapes for subsequent analysis. The resolution of the angioscope used in the present study was 70 µm at a distance of 5 mm (manufacturer’s specifications), which was far better than the lateral resolution of IVUS (430 to 830 µm).10,11
Quantitative Coronary Angiography
We routinely performed coronary angiography in at least 10 projections, and quantitative coronary angiography was performed with the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (Pie Medical BV; Maastricht, The Netherlands) with the "worst view" used to assess the severity of the stenosis.17 Serial changes of quantitative coronary angiography were evaluated with the same angle of projection.
Angioscopic Analysis
Angioscopic images were analyzed with a focus on the following: (1) degree of neointimal coverage over the stent; (2) existence of thrombus; and (3) plaque characteristics underneath the stent struts. Neointimal coverage over the stent was classified into 4 grades as described previously.16 In brief, grade 0=stent struts were fully visible, similar to immediately after implantation; grade 1=stent struts bulged into the lumen and, although covered, were still transparently visible; grade 2=stent struts were embedded by the neointima but were seen translucently; and grade 3=stent struts were fully embedded and were invisible by angioscopy. Neointimal coverage was evaluated in the entire stented segments, and if neointimal coverage was heterogeneous, the dominant pattern was adopted. Any grade 0 coverage independent of length and dominance was marked separately from the dominant patterns. Overlapped stent segments were also evaluated separately. Thrombus was defined on the basis of the criteria adopted by the European Working Group on Coronary Angioscopy.18 The angioscopic definition of yellow plaques was adopted from previous reports,14,15 and the existence of yellow plaques underneath the stent was evaluated.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with JMP 5.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All results are expressed as mean±SD unless otherwise stated. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the patient groups. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparison between pairs. Friedman test was used for serial follow-up that included the third follow-up. Categorical variables were analyzed with Fisher exact test or 
2 test. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Comparison Between SES and BMS
Coronary risk factors were equally distributed in the SES and BMS groups (data not shown). The first follow-up was performed 3.6±0.8 months after SES and 4.2±1.5 months after BMS implantation (P=0.2). The second follow-up was done 10.2±1.3 months after SES and 11.0±1.4 months after BMS implantation (P=0.4). The third follow-up was done 20.5±2.2 months after SES (n=14) and 19.0±1.1 months after BMS (n=4) implantation (P=0.2). Dual antiplatelet therapy was continued until the third follow-up in all SES and in 4 (36%) of the BMS. The other BMS-implanted patients received dual antiplatelet regimen for
1 month after stent implantation.
Lesion and Procedural Characteristics
No significant differences were noted between the SES and BMS groups with regard to lesion and procedural characteristics except for stent length (Table 1).
|
Quantitative Coronary Angiography
No significant differences existed in quantitative coronary angiography findings between the SES and BMS groups immediately after stent implantation with regard to minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis (Table 2). However, at the first follow-up, all quantitative coronary angiography parameters worsened in BMS compared with SES, with a smaller MLD (2.1±0.3 versus 2.7±0.4 mm, P=0.0002), greater percent diameter stenosis (30.0±11.2% versus 15.3±9.1%, P=0.0009), and greater in-stent late loss since the procedure (0.8±0.6 versus 0.1±0.1 mm, P=0.002) in the BMS group than in the SES group. These trends continued to the second follow-up (MLD=1.8±0.5 versus 2.6±0.5 mm, P=0.0007; percent diameter stenosis=34.0±18.1% versus 17.7±13.4%, P=0.003; late loss=1.1±0.7 versus 0.2±0.4 mm, P=0.0005) and the third follow-up (MLD=2.0±0.3 versus 2.5±0.5 mm, P=0.04; percent diameter stenosis=26.4±15.5% versus 16.0±18.1%, P=0.1; late loss=0.6±0.4 versus 0.2±0.6 mm, P=0.01).
|
Angioscopic Findings
Mean neointimal coverage grade at the first follow-up was 2.9±0.3 in BMS versus 1.1±0.5 in SES (P<0.0001); at the second follow-up, it was 3.0±0.0 in BMS versus 1.1±0.5 in SES (P<0.0001), and at the third follow-up, it was 3.0±0.0 in BMS versus 1.3±0.5 in SES (P=0.0009; Figure 1). Hence, neointimal coverage grades were markedly different between SES and BMS throughout the study period. Although the stent length was longer in SES than in BMS, the stent length of each grade did not differ significantly when compared at the second follow-up: grade 0=23.0±0.0 mm, grade 1=25.7±1.2 mm, grade 2=23.0±2.5 mm, and grade 3=21.0±1.3 mm (P=0.2) in both the SES and BMS groups. A white thrombus was observed in an SES implanted segment, and mural red thrombi were observed in 4 patients in the SES group. Yellow plaques were detected in 12 SES (71%) and 1 BMS (9%) at the first follow-up (P=0.002). At the second and third follow-ups, no yellow plaques were evident in BMS, although all the yellow plaques remained in the SES implanted segments. The relationship between neointimal coverage, presence of thrombi, and existence of yellow plaques is shown in Tables 3 and 4
. In the entire cohort of 74 angioscopic observations, a relationship existed between neointimal coverage grades and the presence of thrombi (P=0.002). In addition, low neointimal coverage grades were associated with yellow plaques (P<0.0001). Detailed characteristics of individual patients and stents in the SES group are described in Tables 5 and 6.
|
|
|
|
|
Serial Changes After Stent Implantation
Although MLD, percent diameter stenosis, and in-stent late loss significantly worsened from immediately after stenting to the first follow-up in the BMS group, no significant differences existed between the first and second follow-ups in either the SES or the BMS group, although a trend could be observed in the BMS group to a late loss increase compared with the SES group (Table 2). Thirteen SES (76%) showed grade 1 coverage at the first follow-up, whereas 91% of BMS revealed grade 3 coverage (Figure 1). The other BMS, which showed grade 2 coverage at first follow-up, changed to grade 3 at the second follow-up. All BMS unanimously showed grade 3 coverage at the third follow-up. All SES remained unchanged from the first to the second follow-up, but by the time of the third follow-up, an SES of grade 0 had changed to grade 1, and 2 SES of grade 1 had become grade 2. Hence, neointimal coverage grade was unchanged from the first to the second follow-up both in BMS and in SES, but it became slightly greater afterward in SES (P<0.05). Neointimal proliferation was completely different between SES and BMS throughout the follow-up period (Figures 2 and 3). We also analyzed grade 0 coverage independent of length and dominance. One of the SES showed grade 0 throughout the stent. Additionally, localized grade 0 coverage was detected in 4 stents: 3 were localized at the ostium of a side branch, and the other was localized at the stent-overlapped segment of SES covering SES. All segments showing grade 0 were detected from the first follow-up; no new grade 0 appeared during the follow-up term. Two of the 5 segments classified as grade 0 became grade 1 at the third follow-up; the others remained grade 0 during the follow-up term. Thus, grade 0 coverage in SES remained grades 0 to 1 even 2 years after implantation (Table 6).
|
|
A mural red thrombus was detected in 4 SES. A red thrombus was seen from the first to the third follow-ups in 2 SES; another was detected only at the third follow-up; and the other was seen at the first follow-up, but it was replaced with a new white thrombus at the second follow-up, which disappeared at the third follow-up. It was difficult to determine whether thrombi observed by angioscopy were persistent in a particular location or newly formed.
Yellow plaques underneath the stent struts were decreased from 13 to 12 segments from the first to the second follow-ups. A BMS showing grade 2 coverage at the first follow-up presented yellow plaques underneath the stent, but the plaques disappeared at the second follow-up. In this case, the neointimal coverage over the stent struts changed to grade 3 (ie, neointimal proliferation sealed the yellow plaques underneath), although the yellow plaques were persistently seen at the reference segments (outside the stent). The remainder of the yellow plaques in SES were recognized serially until the third follow-up.
Angioscopic Findings of Neointimal Coverage at Stent-Overlapped Segments
Eight stented segments were overlapped (BMS covering BMS [n=2], SES covering SES [n=4], and BMS covering SES [n=2]). BMS covering BMS segments presented grade 3 neointimal coverage throughout the follow-up term. In contrast, SES covering SES showed low-grade coverage. One of the SES overlapped segments demonstrated grade 0. Another remained as grade 1 throughout the follow-up period. Another remained as grade 1 until the second follow-up, then changed to grade 2 at the third follow-up. The remainder revealed in-stent restenosis, demonstrating grade 3 coverage throughout the follow-up. Segments with BMS covering SES all showed grade 2 coverage until the third follow-up. Thrombus was not attached to any of the overlapped segments.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The present study demonstrated that all BMS had grade 3 neointimal coverage by the first follow-up (4.2±1.5 months after implantation) except for 1 that had grade 2 coverage. In contrast, the majority of SES had grade 1 neointimal coverage. An SES revealed totally exposed struts throughout the stent even at the second follow-up (10 months after implantation). The low-grade neointimal coverage observed in SES left the underlying plaques unsealed. Hence, 71% of SES demonstrated yellow plaques beneath the stent struts during the follow-up periods. Subclinical thrombi were also associated with low-grade (grade 0 or 1) coverage.
Several modalities have been used to evaluate the patterns of neointima after BMS, such as angiography,19,20 IVUS,21 and angioscope.12,13,15 Angiographic studies have shown that the peak of neointimal hyperplasia falls within 6 months after stenting. Afterward, MLD increases up to 3 years (regression).19,20 An IVUS study showed neointimal hyperplasia progressed uniformly throughout the stent.21 Earlier angioscopic studies showed the transparency of neointima gradually decreased for 3 to 6 months after stenting,12,13,15 where the transparency of neointima was associated with the thickness of the neointima.13 These results were in accordance with the present observations in the BMS arm.
Neointimal proliferation after SES implantation has been less well understood.7–9,16 The First In Man study reported long-term follow-up using both quantitative coronary angiography and IVUS for as long as 48 months8,9 and showed a virtual lack of neointimal hyperplasia after implantation of a slow-release SES, which has a similar release profile as the Cypher stent. Using angioscopy, we found incomplete neointimal coverage after SES within 6 months in our previous study.16 Such a prolonged tissue reaction as seen in SES implanted segments resembles that after vascular brachytherapy.4,5 Tissue proliferation after BMS may be completed by 6 months after implantation. In contrast, the healing process after SES implantation may continue well beyond a year. Interestingly, neointimal coverage became slightly but significantly greater at the third follow-up in the SES group, although no significant differences were found between the first and second follow-ups in either the BMS or SES group. Angioscopy showed grade 1 to 2 coverage in 94% of SES as early as 4 months after implantation, and all SES showed grade 1 to 2 coverage after 2 years, whereas IVUS showed a virtual lack of neointima in these periods in the First In Man study. The incidence and timeline of incomplete coverage after implantation of emerging drug-eluting stents should be investigated in large-scale studies.
The present study showed a correlation between neointimal grade and the presence of thrombi (P=0.002). No thrombus was detected in BMS throughout the follow-up period. In contrast, 4 SES showing grade 0 to 1 coverage (2 observations with grade 0 and 7 observations with grade 1) were associated with thrombi. A previous pathological study suggested thrombus attachment was the initial phase for vascular repair.22 One could speculate that the low-grade coverage over SES might be a consequence of the slow healing process.
Interestingly, low-grade (grade 0 to 1) neointimal coverage was associated with the presence of yellow plaques underneath the stent struts (P<0.0001). The majority of stents with grade 0 to 1 coverage (76%) showed yellow plaques, whereas yellow plaques were reduced to 55% with grade 2 coverage. No stent presenting with grade 3 had yellow plaques. A previous angioscopic study that assessed serial morphological changes after BMS demonstrated that stent implantation may aid in the stabilization of unstable plaques.15 These authors claimed that stenting induced angioscopic plaque stabilization (smooth and white plaques without thrombi) by neointimal proliferation. Using angioscopy, Miyamoto et al23 demonstrated that in vitro intimal wall thickness and percent yellow saturation correlated inversely (ie, angioscopic color reflected the thickness of the fibrous cap), which indicates the high resolution of angioscopy. Sealing was completed 6 months after BMS and was associated with complete neointimal coverage. The majority of SES, however, demonstrated grade 1 neointimal coverage at 2 years after implantation in the present study.
Despite the fact that subclinical thrombus in 3 stents and yellow plaques in many stents were found with low-grade neointimal coverage even at 2 years after SES implantation, none of the patients experienced thrombotic clinical events during the follow-up period. These angioscopic findings had no direct link to thrombotic clinical events. The fact that all patients remained under dual antiplatelet therapy is a confounding factor. Large-scale controlled studies are warranted.
Study Limitations
The present study has several limitations. First, this study was a single-center, nonrandomized, historical control study with a small sample size. Nonetheless, the patient background was not statistically different between groups except for stent length, and serial changes in neointimal coverage were assessed in identical patients. Second, although the angioscope we used provides a wide-angle forward view, anatomic structures, such as tortuous vessels, may prohibit a complete circumferential view, which may lead to small regions without neointimal hyperplasia being missed in the examination. Third, we assessed neointimal coverage over the stent using angioscopy, which may include changes in the transparency of the neointima and neointimal thickness; however, those factors cannot be differentiated by angioscopy. Next, the present study only investigated neointimal morphology; local endothelial functional status remains unclear. Indeed, endothelial coverage rather than neointimal hyperplasia is the goal after stent implantation. Reendothelialization with a functional active endothelium has yet to be demonstrated in animals or humans even after BMS implantation. Unfortunately, detection of the endothelial monolayer at stented segments has not been established in living humans, even though optical coherence tomography has higher resolution than IVUS. Finally, only 4 patients underwent angioscopy at the third follow-up in the BMS group. Nonetheless, this should not affect the conclusions, because all of the BMS patients showed grade 3 coverage.
Conclusions
Serial angioscopic findings up to 2 years after SES implantation were markedly different from those after BMS implantation. Neointimal coverage was completed by 3 to 6 months after BMS implantation. In contrast, SES demonstrated the presence of thrombi and yellow plaques even 2 years after implantation.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge the expertise of Drs Noriaki Ito, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Hirokuni Akahori, and Masamichi Yano in performing cardiac catheterization. We also acknowledge technical support from Kenji Yamamoto in performing angioscopy.
Sources of Funding
This research was supported in part by a research grant (to Drs Kotani and Awata) from the Japan Labour Health and Welfare Organization.
Disclosure
None.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico R. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1773–1780.
2. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O’Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1315–1323.
3. Costa MA, Sabate M, van der Giessen WJ, Kay IP, Cervinka P, Ligthart JM, Serrano P, Coen VL, Levendag PC, Serruys PW. Late coronary occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy. Circulation. 1999; 100: 789–792.
4. Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, Popma JJ, Russo RJ, Schatz RA, Guarneri EM, Steuterman S, Sirkin K, Cloutier DA, Leon MB, Tripuraneni P. Three-year clinical and angiographic follow-up after intracoronary radiation: results of a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2000; 101: 360–365.
5. Kay IP, Wardeh AJ, Kozuma K, Foley DP, Knook AH, Thury A, Sianos G, van der Giessen WJ, Levendag PC, Serruys PW. Radioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 14–17.
6. Waksman R, Ajani AE, White RL, Chan R, Bass B, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Torguson R, Deible R, Pinnow E, Lindsay J. Five-year follow-up after intracoronary gamma radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2004; 109: 340–344.
7. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid AC, Rensing BJ, Abizaid AS, Tanajura LF, Kozuma K, Van Langenhove G, Sousa AG, Falotico R, Jaeger J, Popma JJ, Serruys PW. Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2007–2011.
8. Degertekin M, Serruys PW, Foley DP, Tanabe K, Regar E, Vos J, Smits PC, van der Giessen WJ, van den Brand M, de Feyter P, Popma JJ. Persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: long-term (up to 2 years) clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1610–1613.
9. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, Feres F, Seixas AC, Tanajura LF, Mattos LA, Falotico R, Jaeger J, Popma JJ, Serruys PW, Sousa AG. Four-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2326–2329.
10. Engeler CE, Ritenour ER, Amplatz K. Axial and lateral resolution of rotational intravascular ultrasound: in vitro observations and diagnostic implications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1995; 18: 239–242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Elliott MR, Thrush AJ. Measurement of resolution in intravascular ultrasound images. Physiol Meas. 1996; 17: 259–265.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Ueda Y, Nanto S, Komamura K, Kodama K. Neointimal coverage of stents in human coronary arteries observed by angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 341–346.[Abstract]
13. Asakura M, Ueda Y, Nanto S, Hirayama A, Adachi T, Kitakaze M, Hori M, Kodama K. Remodeling of in-stent neointima, which became thinner and transparent over 3 years: serial angiographic and angioscopic follow-up. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2003–2006.
14. Takano M, Mizuno K, Yokoyama S, Seimiya K, Ishibashi F, Okamatsu K, Uemura R. Changes in coronary plaque color and morphology by lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin: serial evaluation by coronary angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 680–686.
15. Sakai S, Mizuno K, Yokoyama S, Tanabe J, Shinada T, Seimiya K, Takano M, Ohba T, Tomimura M, Uemura R, Imaizumi T. Morphologic changes in infarct-related plaque after coronary stent placement: a serial angioscopy study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1558–1565.
16. Kotani J, Awata M, Nanto S, Uematsu M, Oshima F, Minamiguchi H, Mintz GS, Nagata S. Incomplete neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents: angioscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2108–2111.
17. Haase J, Escaned J, van Swijndregt EM, Ozaki Y, Gronenschild E, Slager CJ, Serruys PW. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993; 30: 104–114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. den Heijer P, Foley DP, Hillege HL, Lablanche JM, van Dijk RB, Franzen D, Morice MC, Serra A, de Scheerder IK, Serruys PW, Lie KI; European Working Group on Coronary Angioscopy. The "Ermenonville" classification of observations at coronary angioscopy: evaluation of intra- and inter-observer agreement. Eur Heart J. 1994; 15: 815–822.
19. Kimura T, Yokoi H, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kaburagi S, Sawada Y, Sato Y, Yokoi H, Hamasaki N, Nosaka H, Nobuyoshi M. Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 561–566.
20. Kuroda N, Kobayashi Y, Nameki M, Kuriyama N, Kinoshita T, Okuno T, Yamamoto Y, Komiyama N, Masuda Y. Intimal hyperplasia regression from 6 to 12 months after stenting. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 869–872.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Griffin J, Leon MB. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996; 94: 1247–1254.
22. Schwartz RS. Pathophysiology of restenosis: interaction of thrombosis, hyperplasia, and/or remodeling. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 14E–17E.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Miyamoto A, Prieto AR, Friedl SE, Lin FC, Muller JE, Nesto RW, Abela GS II. Atheromatous plaque cap thickness can be determined by quantitative color analysis during angioscopy: implications for identifying the vulnerable plaque. Clin Cardiol. 2004; 27: 9–15.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
 |
|
 |
|
  N. Kukreja, Y. Onuma, H. M. Garcia-Garcia, J. Daemen, R. van Domburg, P. W. Serruys, and on behalf of the Interventional cardiologists of t The Risk of Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 534 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. C.Y. To, G. Armstrong, I. Zeng, and M. W.I. Webster Noncardiac Surgery and Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 213 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Higo, Y. Ueda, J. Oyabu, K. Okada, M. Nishio, A. Hirata, K. Kashiwase, N. Ogasawara, S. Hirotani, and K. Kodama Atherosclerotic and thrombogenic neointima formed over sirolimus drug-eluting stent an angioscopic study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 616 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Nakazawa, M. Vorpahl, A. V. Finn, J. Narula, and R. Virmani One step forward and two steps back with drug-eluting-stents from preventing restenosis to causing late thrombosis and nouveau atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 625 - 628. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Awata, S. Nanto, M. Uematsu, T. Morozumi, T. Watanabe, T. Onishi, O. Iida, F. Sera, H. Minamiguchi, J.-i. Kotani, et al. Heterogeneous Arterial Healing in Patients Following Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Otake, J. Shite, J. Ako, T. Shinke, Y. Tanino, D. Ogasawara, T. Sawada, N. Miyoshi, H. Kato, B.-K. Koo, et al. Local Determinants of Thrombus Formation Following Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 459 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Aoki, A. J. Lansky, R. Mehran, J. Moses, M. E. Bertrand, B. T. McLaurin, D. A. Cox, A. M. Lincoff, E. M. Ohman, H. D. White, et al. Early Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial Circulation, February 10, 2009; 119(5): 687 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kubo, T. Imanishi, H. Kitabata, A. Kuroi, S. Ueno, T. Yamano, T. Tanimoto, Y. Matsuo, T. Masho, S. Takarada, et al. Comparison of vascular response after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation between patients with unstable and stable angina pectoris a serial optical coherence tomography study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 475 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Fishbein, I. Alferiev, M. Bakay, S. J. Stachelek, P. Sobolewski, M. Lai, H. Choi, I. -W. Chen, and R. J. Levy Local Delivery of Gene Vectors From Bare-Metal Stents by Use of a Biodegradable Synthetic Complex Inhibits In-Stent Restenosis in Rat Carotid Arteries Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2096 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||