| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;117:1649-1657.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Coronary Heart Disease |
From the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unit 543 (C.C., M.R., A. Pezard) and Unit 689 (S.P., T.S., B.E., R.M., AT., Z.M.), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6 (C.C.), Paris, France; and Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Geneva, Switzerland (A. Proudfoot).
Correspondence to Ziad Mallat, MD, PhD, Inserm U689, Centre de Recherche Cardiovasculaire Lariboisière, 41, Bd de la Chapelle, 75010 Paris, France. E-mail mallat{at}larib.inserm.fr
Received October 9, 2007; accepted February 1, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— Here, we show that chemokine-mediated signals critically determine the frequency of monocytes in the blood and bone marrow under both noninflammatory and atherosclerotic conditions. Particularly, CCL2-, CX3CR1-, and CCR5-dependent signals differentially alter CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi (also known as Ly6Chi) and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo (Ly6Clo) monocytosis. Combined inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 in hypercholesterolemic, atherosclerosis-susceptible apolipoprotein E–deficient mice leads to abrogation of bone marrow monocytosis and to additive reduction in circulating monocytes despite persistent hypercholesterolemia. These effects are associated with a marked and additive 90% reduction in atherosclerosis. Interestingly, lesion size highly correlates with the number of circulating monocytes, particularly the CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo subset.
Conclusions— CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 play independent and additive roles in atherogenesis. Signals mediated through these pathways critically determine the frequency of circulating monocyte subsets and thereby account for almost all macrophage accumulation into atherosclerotic arteries.
Key Words: atherosclerosis chemokines inflammation leukocytes monocytes
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 1657
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flow Cytometry
Cell surface staining used the standard procedures and the following monoclonal antibodies: antibody to CD11b (anti–CD11b)-(clone M1/70)-Alexa Fluor 488, anti–Ly-6G (1A8)-phycoerythrin, anti–Ly-6C (AL-21)-biotin, anti–CD4 (clone L3T4)-phycoerythrin, anti–CD3 (clone 145-2C11)-Alexa Fluor 488, anti–CD8a (53-6.7)-Alexa Fluor 647, anti–CD11c-allophycocyanin, and streptavidin-peridin chlorophyll protein (all from BD Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif). Anti–mouse neutrophil 7/4-Alexa Fluor 647 and F4/80-biotin were from Serotec (Oxford, UK). Cell suspensions were incubated with appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies, run for 4-color fluorescence staining on a cytofluorometer (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and analyzed with Cell Quest Pro (Becton Dickinson) software.
Extent and Composition of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Aortic Sinus
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane before being euthanized at 25 weeks of age. Plasma cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein levels were measured with a commercial cholesterol kit (bioMerieux, Marcy lEtoile, France). The heart was taken out, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 hours, and placed in a PBS sucrose 30% solution overnight at 4°C before being included in a cutting medium and frozen at –70°C. Successive 10-µm transversal sections of aortic sinus were obtained. Lipids were detected with Oil Red O as previously described.18 Plaque composition was determined by use of a monoclonal rat anti-mouse macrophage antibody (clone MOMA-2 MAB1852 Chemicon, AbCys, Paris, France), a polyclonal anti-CCR2 antibody (M-50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif), or a polyclonal anti-CCR5 antibody (Santa Cruz). The specificity of the last 2 antibodies was tested in tissue recovered from CCR2–/– (Figure I of the online-only Data Supplement) or CCR5–/– mice.19 At least 4 sections per mouse were inspected for each immunostaining, and appropriate negative controls were used. Lesion size in aortic sinus represents the whole intimal surface. The thoracic aorta was available from some animals for analysis of the extent of lipid accumulation with Oil Red O staining as previously described.18
Peritoneal Inflammation
Peritonitis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of sterile thioglycolate (3% wt/vol in 1 mL sterile saline, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo). Cells were quantified by flow cytometric analysis of the peritoneal lavage 72 hours after injection.
Cells
Blood was drawn via retroorbital puncture with heparin as an anticoagulant. Bone marrow cells were collected from femurs and tibias by insertion of a needle into the bone and flushing with Hanks buffered salt solution supplemented with 0.2% BSA and 1% FCS as previously described. Total viable leukocyte number was determined with the trypan-blue exclusion method. Leukocyte subpopulation numbers were calculated as total leukocytes multiplied by percent cells within the selected population gated by flow cytometry analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical significance was determined by use of 2- or 3-factor (monocyte number) ANOVA. A value of P<0.05 (Bonferroni test) was considered statistically significant. The relation between circulating monocyte number and lesion size was determined through a simple linear regression analysis.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75% increase of total but not high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P<0.0001) compared with the other groups (Figure 1). Lesion size was significantly different among the studied groups (P<0.0001). Lesion size was significantly altered by CCL2 (P<0.0001) or CX3CR1 deficiency (P=0.0009), and no interaction was found between these 2 variables (P=0.86), indicating independent effects of CCL2 and CX3CR1 on lesion size. Interestingly, despite important hypercholesterolemia, triple-knockout mice exhibited a profound 67% decrease in lesion size at the level of the aortic sinus (95 777±17 047 versus 287 999±20 113 µm2 in Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– and Apoe–/– mice, respectively; P<0.0001; Figure 1). This marked inhibition of plaque development was significantly more pronounced than the 28%, 36%, or 48% reduction in lesion size observed in Apoe–/–/CX3CR1–/– (P=0.0012 versus Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– and P=0.039 versus Apoe–/–), Apoe–/–/CCL2–/– (P=0.0082 versus Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– and P=0.0072 versus Apoe–/–), or Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1+/– mice (P=0.024 versus Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– and P<0.0001 versus Apoe–/–), respectively. These results clearly suggest that CX3CR1 and CCL2 play independent and complementary roles in atherosclerosis.
|
Modulation of Local Monocyte/Macrophage Accumulation by CCL2 and CX3CR1
We next examined potential atheroprotective mechanisms associated with CCL2 and/or CX3CR1 deficiency. We found significant and similar inhibition of macrophage accumulation in lesions of Apoe–/–/CCL2–/– and Apoe–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice compared with Apoe–/– mice (Figure 2A and 2B). Reduced macrophage accumulation in Apoe–/–/CCL2–/– mice was associated with a marked decrease in the accumulation of CCR2+ macrophages within the lesions (Figure 2C). Unexpectedly, but in agreement with the results of 1 recent study,11 we observed a reduction in the accumulation of CCR2+ macrophages in lesions of Apoe–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice (Figure 2C). However, accumulation of CCR2+ macrophages was less affected by CX3CR1 compared with CCL2, and combined CCL2 and CX3CR1 deficiency showed no additive effect (Figure 2C). These results suggest a predominant role for CCL2/CCR2 pathway in the recruitment of CCR2+ monocytes into atherosclerotic arteries compared with CX3CR1. Interestingly, lesional macrophage accumulation was lowest in Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice (Figure 2A and 2B) despite higher cholesterol levels (Figure 1C). This could result from an additive reduction in the recruitment of the other major monocyte subset (ie, CCR2– CX3CR1hi Ly6Clo). However, a recent study clearly showed that neither CCR2, the only CCL2 receptor, nor CX3CR1 contributes to recruitment of CCR2– CX3CR1hi Ly6Clo monocytes in atherosclerosis.11 Thus, we hypothesized that the additive protection from lesion development conferred by the simultaneous deletion of CCL2 and CX3CR1 may be related to systemic rather than local effects of chemokine signaling, which may affect the numbers of monocytes in the bloodstream and their interaction with the vessel wall.
|
A recent study suggested that in response to bacterial infection, CCR2-mediated signals in bone marrow determine the emigration of immature Ly6Chi monocytes into the circulation rather than promoting monocyte trafficking between the blood and peripheral tissue.21 We therefore examined the effect of CCL2 and/or CX3CR1 deficiency on the frequency of the 2 major monocyte subsets in the bone marrow and bloodstream.
Differential Modulation of Bone Marrow and Circulating Monocyte Subsets by CCL2 and CX3CR1
In the present study, we defined monocytes as side scatter–low, forward scatter–high cells expressing the myeloid antigen 7/4 (high and low populations) and high levels of CD11b but showing no expression for the neutrophil marker Ly6G (Figure 3A). In addition, side scatter–low, forward scatter–high, CD11b-high, 7/4-high cells showed almost no staining for NK cell marker NK1.1, and <20% of 7/4-low cells were contaminated by NK cells (online-only Data Supplement Figure II). CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi cells correspond to Ly6Chi monocytes, and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo cells correspond to Ly6Clo monocytes (online-only Data Supplement Figure III). Monocyte number and phenotypes were significantly different among the various groups (P<0.001). Apoe background and CCL2 deficiency significantly affected monocyte number (P<0.001). In agreement with recent data,10 we observed increased bone marrow and blood monocytosis in Apoe–/– mice (Figures 3 and 4
, solid bars) and a shift toward the CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi subset in the blood compared with Apoe+/+ mice (Figure 3, open bars). However, in the present study, both CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo subsets contributed to blood monocytosis under moderate hypercholesterolemia (Figure 3B). The difference between these studies may be due in part to differences in the phenotyping of the 7/4lo monocyte subset. We observed a significant reduction in the total number of circulating monocytes in CCL2–/– mice under normocholesterolemic conditions (Apoe+/+ background) because of a reduction in both CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo monocytes (Figure 3B), supporting similar findings reported in CCR2–/– animals.21,22 The significant reduction in circulating monocyte numbers was maintained under the hypercholesterolemic and atherosclerotic Apoe–/– background (Apoe–/–/CCL2–/– compared with Apoe–/– mice in Figure 3B). However, in contrast to CCR2 deficiency, which led to accumulation of Ly6Chi (here, CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi) monocytes in the bone marrow,21,22 CCL2 deficiency did not, and it even led to a reduction in bone marrow monocyte number under the Apoe–/– background (Figure 4B), suggesting that other chemokines compensate for the absence of CCL2 to mediate emigration of CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi monocytes into the circulation.22 Short-term administration of CCL2 to C57Bl/6 mice led to an increase in monocyte number in the blood and bone marrow (online-only Data Supplement Figure IV), suggesting that CCL2 may control monocyte number. Whether this effect requires CCR2 signaling in monocytes is currently unknown. Our results clearly show that CCL2 deficiency inhibits bone marrow CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi monocytosis in hypercholesterolemic mice and controls circulating monocyte number, which may have contributed, at least in part, to the marked inhibition of CCR2+ macrophage accumulation in the atherosclerotic lesions of Apoe–/–/CCL2–/– mice (Figure 2).
|
|
CX3CR1 deficiency was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward a lower number of monocytes in the bone marrow (Figure 4) but did not affect total blood monocyte number (Figure 3). Our observation that CX3CR1 deficiency resulted in reduced accumulation of CCR2+ cells within the lesions without affecting the number of CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi (CCR2+) monocytes in the circulating blood suggests a role for CX3CR1 signaling in the recruitment of this monocyte subset from the blood into the atherosclerotic lesions, which is in agreement with previous findings.11 Interestingly, CX3CR1 deficiency induced a specific reduction in the number of circulating CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo (Figure 3C), consistent with the high level of CX3CR1 expression on this monocyte subset in Apoe+/+ and Apoe–/– mice. Furthermore, combined CCL2 and CX3CR1 deficiency in the Apoe–/– background resulted in a significant reduction in bone marrow and circulating monocytes as a result of the additive reduction in CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo subsets (Figures 3 and 4
). Of note, individual deficiency of either CCL2 or CX3CR1 was not sufficient to inhibit the ability of mice to increase total monocyte number in the bone marrow and circulating blood when switched from a normocholesterolemic nonatherosclerotic Apoe+/+ to a hypercholesterolemic atherosclerotic Apoe–/– background (Figures 3 and 4
). However, combined CCL2 and CX3CR1 deficiency totally abrogated Apoe–/–-associated bone marrow and blood monocytosis, which returned to levels observed in Apoe+/+ mice, despite higher levels of plasma cholesterol (Figures 3 and 4
). We found no effects of CCL2 and/or CX3CR1 deficiency on neutrophil, CD4+, or CD8+ lymphocyte count in the Apoe–/– background (data not shown). These results identify critical, independent, and complementary roles for CCL2- and CX3CR1-mediated signals in bone marrow and blood (CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo) monocytosis, which could explain the additive roles of these pathways in promoting lesion development in Apoe–/– mice.
In contrast to its role in atherosclerosis, we found that specific inhibition of the recruitment of CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo monocytes in CX3CR1–/– mice was not sufficient to alter monocytic peritonitis in response to intraperitoneal thioglycollate (online-only Data Supplement Figure V), confirming the prominent role of CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi monocyte recruitment through CCL2/CCR223 in this setting.
Combined Inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 Almost Abolishes Atherosclerosis
Finally, we wanted to identify the chemokine pathway(s) responsible for the residual atherogenesis that showed resistance to combined CCL2 and CX3CR1 inhibition. In contrast to the marked reduction in CCR2+ macrophages, we found persistent accumulation of CCR5+ cells in lesions of Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice (Figure 5A). Interestingly, treatment of the triple-knockout mice from week 14 to 25 with Met-CCL5, an antagonist of CCR5 signaling, induced an additional 75% reduction in lesion size (Figure 5B) despite persistent high plasma cholesterol levels (5.7±0.5 g/L; P=NS versus Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice). This result is consistent with the role of CCR5 in monocyte recruitment and atherosclerotic lesion development.11,17,19 The reduction in atherosclerosis after Met-CCL5 treatment was associated with a marked additional reduction in the number of circulating CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi and CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo monocytes (Figure 5C), again suggesting a critical role for chemokine signals in the modulation of the frequency of circulating monocytes in atherosclerosis. Met-CCL5 treatment did not affect blood monocyte number in Apoe+/+ mice (data not shown), ruling out any toxic effect of Met-CCL5 on blood monocytes. Overall, we found that combined inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 pathways almost abrogates macrophage accumulation and atherosclerosis in Apoe–/– mice (90% reduction). Of note, under this moderate hypercholesterolemia, lesion size highly correlated with the total number of circulating monocytes (r2=0.97, P=0.0016; Figure 5D) and with the number of CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4hi (r2=0.90, P=0.01) or CD11b+ Ly6G– 7/4lo monocytes (r2=0.99, P=0.0003).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Taken individually, several chemokines and chemokine receptors play a significant role in the development of atherosclerosis.4 However, direct evidence of additive roles for these pathways in experimental models of the disease is still lacking. A recent study examined the effect of combined inhibition of CCR2 and CXCR3 signaling on lesion formation in Apoe–/– mice.24 The authors showed that CCR2 and CXCR3 play differential roles during atherogenesis, with CCR2 promoting lesion development within the aortic root and CXCR3 affecting lesion formation within the abdominal aorta.24 Thus, CCR2 and CXCR3 differentially influence the site of lesion formation but play no additive role in promoting arterial leukocyte accumulation at a given atherosclerosis-prone site.
When we initiated the present study >3 years ago, we hypothesized that 2 particular pathways, CCL2/CCR2 and CX3CL1/CX3CR1, could play independent, complementary roles to promote a high level of macrophage accumulation within the atherosclerotic artery and to accelerate plaque development. Our hypothesis was based on several observations. Deletion of either the CCL2/CCR2 or CX3CL1/CX3CR1 pathway reduces monocyte accumulation within the vascular lesions and leads to reduced susceptibility to atherosclerosis in murine models.12,14,16,25 CCL2/CCR2 interaction favors rolling and diapedesis of circulating monocytes through the endothelial layer3,26,27 and requires integrin activation on monocytes.28 On the contrary, CX3CL1 and its specific receptor CX3CR1 allow firm adhesion of monocytes on endothelial and smooth muscle cells independently of integrin activation.29 These 2 receptors not only use different methods for monocyte adhesion/infiltration but also may recruit various subsets of monocytes. CX3CL1 preferentially mediates the adhesion of CD16+ monocytes, whereas CCL2 acts on CD16– monocytes.30 In addition, recent studies suggest that CCL2 enhances the adhesion of monocytes to CX3CL1,31 which may enhance the retention of monocytes on CX3CL1-expressing smooth muscle cells,32 suggesting that CCL2 and CX3CL1 act in unison to recruit monocytes and enhance their accumulation into vascular lesions. In the present study, we show that combined inhibition of 2 different chemokine pathways, CCL2 and CX3CR1, leads to additive reduction in lesion development within the aortic root of male Apoe–/– mice fed a chow diet. The effect probably extends to other atherosclerosis-prone sites because we observed a trend toward a more profound inhibition of atherogenesis in the thoracic aorta after combined deletion of CCL2 and CX3CR1 (online-only Data Supplement Figure VI) despite higher plasma cholesterol levels. In addition, in the complementary work by Saederup et al33 (see the companion article), the authors nicely show an additive reduction in atherosclerosis (within both the thoracic aorta and the aortic root) after combined deficiency in CCR2 and CX3CL1 using Apoe–/– mice fed a Western diet. Taken together, these 2 studies clearly show for the first time that specific chemokine pathways, here CCL2/CCR2 and CX3CL1/CX3CR1, play nonredundant, complementary roles in vivo in a chronic inflammatory disease, here atherosclerosis.
Interestingly, we found that macrophage accumulation within atherosclerotic arteries was lowest in Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/ CX3CR1–/– mice but was not significantly different from that observed in Apoe–/–/CCL2–/– or Apoe–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice. It could be argued that this suggests no substantial additive effect of combined inhibition of CCL2 and CX3CR1 on macrophage accumulation within the vessel wall. However, it is important to note that Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice showed the smallest reduction in lesion size despite a very important and significant increase in plasma cholesterol levels, a major atherogenic stimulus. Indeed, lesion size was significantly correlated with plasma cholesterol levels in the triple-knockout mice (online-only Data Supplement Figure VII), suggesting that if plasma cholesterol levels had been equivalent to those found in the other groups of mice, the reduction in lesion size would have been much more profound in the triple-knockout animals. Thus, taken together, these results clearly reveal a major inhibitory role of combined CCL2 and CX3CR1 deficiency on arterial inflammation.
An important finding in the present study is that the major role of chemokines and chemokine receptors in atherosclerosis may relate to their role in the modulation of monocyte number in both bone marrow and circulating blood. Our results clearly show that deletion of CCL2 and CX3CR1 abolishes hypercholesterolemia-associated blood monocytosis, identifying a critical role for chemokine signaling in this process. In addition, we found that chemokine pathways differentially affect the number of monocyte subsets, with CCL2 having major impact on both Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo monocytes and CX3CR1 specifically affecting Ly6Clo monocytosis. Unexpectedly, the control of circulating monocyte number by CCL2 and CX3CR1 was associated with a reduction in, not accumulation of, monocytes within the bone marrow, suggesting that their role in the modulation of monocytosis goes beyond the control of monocyte emigration from the bone marrow into the circulating blood, as recently suggested for CCR2-mediated signaling.21,22 It will be important in future studies to identify in detail the precise signals and mechanisms responsible for the chemokine-dependent increase in monocyte number, which may include increased monocyte differentiation, proliferation, and/or survival. A previous study10 suggested a predominant role for Ly6Chi monocytes in atherogenesis under high-fat feeding. However, given the strong correlation between the number of Ly6Clo monocytes and lesion size reported in the present work, we believe that this monocyte subset may significantly contribute to lesion formation, at least under moderate hypercholesterolemia.
An intriguing finding in the present study is that inhibition of CX3CR1 signaling resulted in a relative increase in the accumulation of CCR5+ cells within the lesions, suggesting an exclusive interaction between these 2 pathways in the recruitment of CCR5+ leukocytes. The latter may include macrophages, T cells, and smooth muscle cells. However, CCR5+ staining most likely represented macrophages given the very small size of T cells (relative to macrophages) and the absence of smooth muscle cells within the lesions of the triple-knockout mice (data not shown). Interestingly, inhibition of CCR5 signaling in CCL2/CX3CR1-deficient mice almost abrogated arterial macrophage accumulation, identifying 3 major and complementary pathways that control lesion development in Apoe–/– mice. Again, inhibition of CCR5 signaling led to a marked reduction in the number of circulating monocytes, further supporting an important role for chemokines in the modulation of systemic monocyte number. The effect of Met-CCL5 on atherosclerosis could be related, at least in part, to inhibition of CCR5 signaling in T cells. However, it is remarkable that the reduction in lesion size in mice with defective CCL2, CX3CR1, and/or CCR5 signaling strongly correlated with the reduction in circulating monocyte number. Similar results were reported by Smith et al5 in Apoe–/– mice with osteopetrotic mutation. It will be important to examine in future studies whether chemokine-mediated regulation of bone marrow and blood monocyte number requires an intact M-CSF pathway. Finally, it could be argued that modulation of bone marrow and blood monocytosis is not a primary effect of chemokine inhibition but is secondary to atherosclerosis reduction. However, our results show that short-term administration of CCL2 enhances bone marrow and circulating monocyte number, suggesting a direct effect of chemokines on monocytosis. In addition, the 99% reduction in atherosclerosis in severely hypercholesterolemic ldlr–/– mice with heterozygous osteopetrotic mutation was not associated with significant changes in the percentage of circulating monocytes,34 suggesting that a reduction in atherosclerosis is not a prerequisite for a reduction in circulating monocyte number.
The mechanisms responsible for the increase in total and non–high-density lipoprotein plasma cholesterol levels in Apoe–/–/CCL2–/–/CX3CR1–/– mice were not explored. This increase could occur as a direct or indirect consequence of combined CCL2 and CX3CR1 deletion. Interestingly, Smith et al5 reported similar findings in Apoe–/–/M-csf–/– mice that showed reduced monocyte number, suggesting a potential role for monocytes/macrophages in the modulation of lipid metabolism.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by grants from Inserm, ANR Cardiovasculaire, obésité et diabète (AO5088DS), and European Grant Innochem 518167. Drs Combadière, Tedgui, and Mallat are recipients of Contract Interface from Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, and M. Rodero is supported by a scholarship from the Canceropole Île de France. Dr Potteaux was supported by Groupe de Réflexion sur la Recherche Cardiovasculaire, France.
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The online Data Supplement, which contains figures, can be found with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.745091/DC1.
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 117: 1621.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||