Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:1964-1972
Published online before print April 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735779
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/15/1964    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735779v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lurz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonhoeffer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lurz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonhoeffer, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:1964-1972.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Interventional Cardiology

Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation

Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome

Philipp Lurz, BSc; Louise Coats, MRCP; Sachin Khambadkone, MD, MRCP; Johannes Nordmeyer, MD; Younes Boudjemline, MD; Silvia Schievano, MEng; Vivek Muthurangu, MRCP; Twin Yen Lee, RN; Giovanni Parenzan, MA; Graham Derrick, MRCP; Seamus Cullen, MRCPI; Fiona Walker, MRCP; Victor Tsang, MD, FRCS; John Deanfield, FRCP; Andrew M. Taylor, MD, MRCP, FRCR; Philipp Bonhoeffer, MD

From the UCL Institute of Child Health (P.L., L.C., S.K., J.N., S.S., V.M., G.D., S.C., V.T., J.D., A.M.T., P.B.), London, United Kingdom; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust (P.L., L.C., S.K., J.N., S.S., V.M., T.Y.L., G.P., G.D., V.T., J.D., A.M.T., P.B.), Cardiothoracic Unit, London, United Kingdom; Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique (Y.B.), Hôspital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France; and The Heart Hospital NHS Trust (S.C., F.W., V.T., J.D., P.B.), London, United Kingdom.

Correspondence to Philipp Bonhoeffer, Cardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond St, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. E-mail BonhoP{at}gosh.nhs.uk

Received August 23, 2007; accepted February 15, 2008.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation was introduced in the year 2000 as a nonsurgical treatment for patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction.

Methods and Results— Between September 2000 and February 2007, 155 patients with stenosis and/or regurgitation underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. This led to significant reduction in right ventricular systolic pressure (from 63±18 to 45±13 mm Hg, P<0.001) and right ventricular outflow tract gradient (from 37±20 to 17±10 mm Hg, P<0.001). Follow-up ranged from 0 to 83.7 months (median 28.4 months). Freedom from reoperation was 93% (±2%), 86% (±3%), 84% (±4%), and 70% (±13%) at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Freedom from transcatheter reintervention was 95% (±2%), 87% (±3%), 73% (±6%), and 73% (±6%) at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Survival at 83 months was 96.9%. On time-dependent analysis, the first series of 50 patients (log-rank test P<0.001) and patients with a residual gradient >25 mm Hg (log-rank test P=0.01) were associated with a higher risk of reoperations.

Conclusions— Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation resulted in the ability to avoid surgical right ventricular outflow tract revision in the majority of cases. This procedure might reduce the number of operations needed over the total lifetime of patients with right ventricle–to–pulmonary artery conduits.


Key Words: pulmonary valve • heart defects, congenital • catheterization • stenosis • regurgitation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Dysfunction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) with pulmonary stenosis and/or regurgitation is a common and challenging condition in children and adults with congenital heart defects. Surgical RVOT revision can be performed with a very low mortality,1,2 but valved conduits have a limited lifespan, often <10 years.3–7 As a result, the majority of patients with right ventricle (RV)–to–pulmonary artery (PA) conduits undergo multiple open heart operations. To prolong conduit lifespan, bare-metal stenting in the setting of the RVOT obstruction has been performed.8–10 This leads to a reduction in RV pressures and sometimes symptomatic improvement but causes free pulmonary regurgitation (PR) with detrimental effects on RV function and risk of arrhythmia.11–13 Transcatheter valve insertion in the pulmonary position has been shown to be a safe and feasible treatment for both pulmonary stenosis and PR.14,15 We now describe early and late results of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) and the impact of evolving technology and a learning curve on clinical outcome in our total experience of 155 consecutive patients.

Clinical Perspective p 1972


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Between September 2000 and February 2007, 155 patients underwent PPVI (Figures 1 and 2Down). Patients had to fulfill clinical and morphological criteria to be considered suitable candidates. Inclusion criteria, summarized in Table 1, were based on surgical indications for RVOT revision.16 Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, occluded central veins, active infection, and weight <20 kg. Valve implantation was performed to reduce RVOT dysfunction and thereby delay surgery and prolong conduit lifespan. Criteria for surgical or transcatheter reintervention were based on the initial inclusion criteria.


Figure 1189387
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The percutaneous pulmonary valve (Melody, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn).


Figure 2189387
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Lateral angiogram before (A) and after (B) PPVI in a patient with homograft obstruction and regurgitation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

PPVI was performed by a single operator at Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades (Paris, France), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, The Heart Hospital, and The Harley Street Clinic (London, United Kingdom). Written informed consent was obtained from patients and parents as appropriate. The ethics committees at these institutions approved the study protocol. The study was approved by CCPPRB (Comité Consultatif de Protection des Personnes dans la Recherche Biomédicale; Paris, France) and MHRA (Medical Health Regulatory Authority; London, United Kingdom) and performed under humanitarian exemption in a case-by-case controlled fashion.

Protocol
Patients were assigned to New York Heart Association functional classes I through IV. Objective exercise capacity was measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing unless contraindicated. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients. The RV systolic pressure was estimated from the tricuspid regurgitant jet and the RVOT gradient calculated from the velocity across the RVOT.17 PR was defined qualitatively by color flow Doppler,18 whereas RV dysfunction and dilatation were assessed by 2-dimensional echocardiography.

Morphological suitability for PPVI was either assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or, in those who had contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging, by biplane angiography.15,19 With increasing experience, balloon sizing of the RVOT was added to the assessment protocol in patients with borderline anatomy. The utility of this technique has been demonstrated in the setting of other transcatheter interventions such as atrial septal defect closure20 and PA stenting.21 After coronary obstruction due to PPVI in 1 patient, angiography in the ascending aorta was performed in all patients. Simultaneous balloon inflation in the RVOT and coronary angiography were performed in patients at risk for coronary obstruction.8,22,23

Valve implantation was performed under general anesthesia. Pressure measurements and angiography were performed before and after PPVI. The technique has been reported previously.15 Echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 1, 6, 12, 36, and 70 months, respectively. Echocardiograms were performed (P.L., L.C., S.K., and J.N.); follow-up echocardiograms performed at patients’ local institutions were reviewed by the investigators.

Predictors for Reoperation and Transcatheter Reintervention
We assessed the impact of learning curve by dividing the patient population into a cohort that consisted of the first 50 patients who underwent PPVI and a second cohort representing the following 105 patients. After the 50th patient, the device design was frozen, and the authors believed that the learning curve had been completed in terms of technical experience and patient selection. To predict outcome related to hemodynamic results, we assessed the impact of a residual gradient on rate of reoperation and transcatheter reintervention. This was defined by a pullback gradient across the valved stent of >25 mm Hg, measured immediately after device deployment.

Statistical Analysis
Baseline variables were calculated as mean±SD or n (%). Survival curves were obtained by Kaplan–Meier plots. Reoperation and transcatheter reintervention-free survival was calculated from date of valve implantation to latest follow-up or date of surgery/catheterization and was expressed as percentage ±SEM. Patients who underwent second PPVI were not excluded from analysis of freedom from reoperation. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to assess the impact of the learning curve and the initial hemodynamics on reoperation-free and transcatheter reintervention-free survival. Log-rank testing was performed to compare groups. A paired t test was used to evaluate differences in invasively measured pressures before and after PPVI. Echocardiographic data were evaluated for changes from 1 month postprocedure to 6, 12 and 36 months using a linear model with an unstructured covariance structure and time as a repeated variable. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed on SPSS 11.0 for Mac (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA).

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population and Characteristics
Out of 163 patients enrolled, 8 patients did not meet the morphological criteria and therefore did not undergo PPVI. The reasons were unfavorable RVOT dimensions as assessed by balloon sizing in 6 patients. Another reason for abandonment of PPVI was proven risk of left coronary artery compression demonstrated by balloon inflation within the RV-to-PA conduit (n=1).22

The median age of the present patient population was 21.2 years (range 7 to 71 years); 57 patients were <16 years old (37%), and 42% were female (Table 2). Most patients (61%) had tetralogy of Fallot or a variant morphology; 92% had an RV-to-PA conduit placed at previous surgery, 81% of which were homografts. Before the procedure, an RV-to–systemic pressure ratio of >2/3 was present in 58% of patients; echocardiography showed moderate or severe PR in 64%. The vast majority of patients complained of symptoms (138 of 155 patients), and 61% had impaired exercise capacity (defined as a peak oxygen consumption <65% of predicted). In total, 17 asymptomatic patients underwent PPVI. Indications for intervention in the absence of symptoms were RV-to–systemic pressure ratio >3/4 (0.89±0.13) in 9, peak oxygen consumption <65% of predicted (54.7±1.0%) in 4, and severe RV dilatation in 4 (z score for RV end-diastolic diameter assessed on echocardiography 5.9±2.3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Patient Characteristics

All but 8 patients in the present series were suitable for surgical RV-to-PA conduit replacement. In these 8, contraindications for surgery were pulmonary hypertension (n=4), severe chest deformity (n=2), and cardiogenic shock when referred for PPVI (n=2).

Procedural Results
Procedures were performed via a femoral venous approach in all but 7 cases. In these 7 patients, transjugular access was necessary owing to femoral venous occlusion or azygous vein continuity. After successful valve implantation, RV systolic pressure (63±18 to 45±13 mm Hg, P<0.001) and RVOT gradient (37±20 to 17±10 mm Hg, P<0.001) fell significantly (Table 3). In addition, postprocedural angiography showed relief of PR, which was reflected in an increase in diastolic PA pressure (from 10±4 to 14±9 mm Hg, P<0.001). No patient had more than mild PR on angiography after valve implantation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Pressures at Catheterization

Seven major procedural complications were seen: device instability, including dislodgement of the device (n=2); homograft rupture (n=3); compression of the left main coronary artery after device deployment (n=1); and obstruction of the origin of the right PA (n=1).1 Other complications included guidewire injury of a distal PA with minor bronchial bleeding (n=2); partial homograft rupture that led to confined extravasation of contrast medium (n=1); and damage to the tricuspid valve caused by the balloon of the delivery system, which led to moderate tricuspid regurgitation (n=2). Five patients who had major complications required surgical RVOT revision; none of these procedures led to mortality. However, prolonged resuscitation after homograft rupture in 1 patient led to neurological sequelae followed by good recovery. One patient required surgery for hemostasis after homograft rupture, but the valved stent was conserved.

Follow-Up
Follow-up ranged from 0 to 83.7 months (median 28.4 months). Follow-up was 100% complete for death, reoperation, and transcatheter reintervention. Freedom from reoperation was 93±2%, 86±3%, 84±4%, and 70±13% at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Patients who underwent reoperation are summarized in Table 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Patients With Explanted Valves

Reinterventions in the form of balloon dilation of the device (n=3) and second valve implantation with a "stent-in-stent" technique (n=19) were performed in 22 patients. Freedom from transcatheter reintervention was 95±2%, 87±3%, 73±6%, and 73±6% at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Indication for reintervention was predominantly obstruction related to the "hammock" effect in 7 patients and stent fractures in 9 cases. The incidence of stent fractures in the total population in the present study was 21%. The nature of and reasons for the hammock effect and stent fractures have been described previously.15,24 Other reasons for second valve implantation were restenosis of unknown origin (n=4) and a residual RVOT gradient after the first procedure (n=2). Second PPVI led to a significant decrease in RVOT gradient (from 47.6±18.2 to 19.5±10.0 mm Hg, P<0.001) with no procedural complications.

Echocardiographic follow-up was 90.1% complete. On echocardiography, valvar competence was well maintained during follow-up; moderate PR was only seen in 2 patients in the context of endocarditis (Figure 3). PPVI was performed in 4 patients with pulmonary hypertension. Despite high diastolic PA pressures, all patients had mild or less PR at a median follow-up of 18.5 months.


Figure 3189387
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Valvar competence during follow-up assessed on echocardiography. PR was graded as absent, trivial, mild, moderate, or severe and expressed as a percentage before valve implantation and at 1, 6, 12, 36, and 70 months after PPVI.

In the cohort of patients who did not undergo reoperation or transcatheter reintervention, the peak velocity across the device increased slightly from 1 month to 36 months after the procedure (P=0.07). At 1, 6, 12, 36, and 70 months, peak RVOT velocity was 2.64±0.6 m/s (n=107), 2.7±0.59 m/s (n=86), 2.66±0.5 m/s (n=83), 2.89±0.74 m/s (n=25), and 3.7±1.31 m/s (n=3), respectively (Table 5). At a follow-up of 70 months, 2 patients who underwent PPVI at the age of 11.5±0.9 years were awaiting surgical RVOT revision owing to outgrown conduits.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Peak Velocity Across the RVOT During Follow-Up Assessed by Echocardiography

Complications During Follow-Up
Endocarditis was diagnosed in 5 patients at a median of 4.93 (range 1.9 to 23.2) months after PPVI. In these patients, endocarditis occurred in the context of unprotected dental treatment (n=1), reactivation of previously treated fungal infection (n=1), and a septic wound after arm trauma (n=1). Two patients had histories of endocarditis treated medically before PPVI. Organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus aurelius, and Candida albicans. Endocarditis led to valve explantation in 3 patients; 2 patients were successfully treated medically, which led to moderate PR on echocardiography 1 year after diagnosis.

After technically successful valve implantation into a 15-mm homograft, 1 patient developed hemolysis within hours after the procedure. This was attributed to a significant residual gradient (60 mm Hg) in a rather small homograft in addition to external compression of the RVOT, which necessitated device explantation.

One patient who underwent PPVI for RV-to-PA conduit stenosis after Rastelli repair experienced an out-of-hospital arrest 3.5 years after the procedure. Ventricular tachycardia was documented at resuscitation, and she was resuscitated successfully without neurological sequelae. At latest follow-up, 2.3 months before the event, echocardiography had revealed a competent valve with a peak velocity across the valved stent of 3.0 m/s. On ventricular stimulation during electrophysiological studies, no arrhythmia could be induced, and an implantable defibrillator was inserted. Although benign in the majority of cases,24 stent fractures led to stent embolization into the right PA in 1 patient, who required surgical explantation of the percutaneous pulmonary valve.

Mortality
Four of 155 patients who underwent PPVI died. Survival at 83 months was 96.6%. Two of the patients who died had presented in cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure, and PPVI was performed as a palliative strategy. The first patient had a history of 5 previous operations, deteriorated 6 weeks after a technically successful PPVI, and died of a chest infection. The second presented in multiorgan failure and severe fluid overload with critical recoarctation and RVOT obstruction. Despite successful PPVI and dilation of severe recoarctation, the patient died of pulmonary edema 24 hours after the procedure.

Two patients died suddenly at 8 and 35 months after PPVI. In both cases, autopsy revealed the valved stent appropriately seated in the RVOT. At latest follow-up, echocardiography showed good valvar competence of the device with a peak velocity across it of <3 m/s. The deaths were presumed to be due to arrhythmia.

Impact of the Learning Curve on Outcome
Freedom from reoperation in the first series of 50 patients was significantly shorter than in the subsequent patient population (log-rank test P<0.001; Figure 4A). In addition, residual gradients measured invasively after PPVI were associated with higher rates of reoperation (log-rank test P=0.01; Figure 4B) and transcatheter reintervention (log-rank test P=0.008).


Figure 4189387
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. A, Kaplan–Meier plots comparing freedom from reoperation in the cohort of the first 50 patients (blue line) and the cohort consisting of the following 105 patients (red line). B, Freedom from reoperation in patients with an invasively measured postprocedural gradient >25 mm Hg (blue line) and <25 mm Hg (red line).

Of the first 50 patients, 16 patients underwent device explantation compared with 5 patients in the second cohort. The incidence of a residual gradient of >25 mm Hg was higher in the first cohort of patients (n=16 of 50 versus 5 of 105 patients in the second cohort). Freedom from transcatheter reintervention did not differ significantly in the 2 cohorts on time-dependent analysis (n=13 versus n=9; log-rank test P=0.18). This is due to the fact that reinterventions were performed predominantly due to stent fractures, a complication that was not affected by the learning curve. The incidence of procedural complications fell from 6% in the first cohort to 2.9% in the second cohort of patients (n=3 of 50 versus 3 of 105 patients).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Percutaneous interventions on the RVOT have been performed to avoid multiple open heart operations in patients with repaired congenital heart disease. Balloon dilation and bare-metal stenting of the outflow tract have successfully achieved relief of obstruction; however, these procedures compromise valvular function.8–10,25 In contrast, PPVI represents a percutaneous technique to treat both pulmonary stenosis and regurgitation. We report our current experience of 155 patients who underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation. This experience constitutes the longest and largest single-operator experience in percutaneous insertion of a heart valve. We have demonstrated that PPVI is an effective treatment for RVOT dysfunction. Device deployment was successful with very few exceptions and led to a marked improvement in hemodynamics. This was achieved with a very low complication rate and mortality.

PPVI was performed with the aim to prolong the lifespan of the valved conduit, thus delaying surgery. Needless to say, the longevity of immediate and early results is crucial to the success of this technique. During follow-up over months, the hemodynamic improvement was sustained in the majority of patients.

Although reoperation and transcatheter reintervention were required in some patients during follow-up due to recurrence of stenosis, none required reinterventions for valvular incompetence in the absence of endocarditis. Initially, early restenosis was caused by the hammock effect,15 which was resolved by altering the device design. Occurrence of stent fracture during follow-up led to an increase in RVOT gradient and RV pressures.24 This was treatable with a second device, which proved to be a safe and successful approach.

Procedures were performed over a time frame of >6 years. In this period, the device design has been altered, the delivery system has improved, and the operator’s confidence has grown. Therefore, we clearly identified a learning curve in our results. Freedom from reoperation was significantly longer in the second cohort of patients (51st through 155th) who underwent PPVI. Several factors contributed to this improvement. First, the incidence of residual gradients was reduced. A postprocedural gradient >25 mm Hg was associated with shorter freedom from reoperation. Incorrect patient selection, including patients with small conduits, and the reluctance to postdilate implanted valves led more frequently to postprocedural pressure gradients >25 mm Hg in the first cohort. In the second cohort, patients with residual gradients after PPVI were postdilated with high-pressure balloons with no demonstrable negative impact on valvar function. Second, patient selection improved with better understanding of the implantation site. Thus, device dislodgement at the time of PPVI was seen only in the first group. Careful assessment of conduit type, RVOT morphology,19,26 and distensibility24 has resulted in appropriate case selection for PPVI. This led us to understand that PPVI should generally not be attempted in patients with patch reconstruction of the RVOT and very distensible homografts, in the absence of an RV-to-PA gradient (seen in both patients in whom device dislodgement occurred). Third, strategies to deal with device failures changed: patients underwent a second PPVI in the latter experience rather than a reoperation. Finally, most procedural complications occurred within the series of the first 50 patients and, in our opinion, represent the learning curve. Despite clear progress, we have not found any strategies to predict or avoid homograft rupture. Further investigation is necessary to identify patients at risk of this complication.

The success of PPVI has significant implications for the timing of interventions for RVOT dysfunction. In clinical practice, timing of operation is often biased by the patient’s and physician’s reluctance to commit to multiple open heart surgeries, thereby exposing the RV to an increasing duration of abnormal loading conditions. Although reduction of RV diastolic and systolic volumes can be achieved even when patients are treated late,27 studies have shown a lack of improvement in RV ejection fraction and exercise performance after surgical valve implantation.28–31 The availability of PPVI might lead to better patient acceptance and therefore promote earlier intervention before irreversible ventricular dysfunction occurs. Although the optimal timing for intervention remains controversial, PPVI can allow for postponement of surgery after restoration of an acceptable RV loading condition.

Study Limitations
Because this is a midterm analysis of results after PPVI, long-term valvar performance is still unknown. It is likely that valvar degeneration, as seen in surgically implanted biological valves, will occur in this device. In the present series, however, we have not seen valvar degeneration leading to stenosis or regurgitation in the absence of endocarditis. Although PPVI led to a significant reduction in RV pressure and RVOT gradient, a small residual gradient was still present in the majority of cases after the procedure. The long-term effects of low outflow tract gradients are unknown. Again, longer follow-up is necessary to address this question. Results of PPVI were not compared with surgical pulmonary valve implantation. However, transcatheter implantation of a valve in the pulmonary position was performed to prolong a surgical result after conduit placement rather than as a surrogate for open heart surgery. Therefore, we chose to assess the potential of PPVI to delay surgery by applying the same criteria for reintervention as for initial treatment, which were based on surgical indications.

Conclusions
PPVI improves RV outflow hemodynamics and delays surgery by prolonging conduit lifespan. Our experience represents the impact of evolving technologies in medicine, with progressive improvement in clinical results by device and technique modification. PPVI should reduce the number of operations and the cumulative hemodynamic burden on the RV over the total lifetime of children and young adults, potentially improving the life expectancy of patients with congenital heart disease that involves the RVOT.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to Vickie Conley (Medtronic) and Allen Tower (NuMed), without whom this technology would not have been developed.

Sources of Funding

P. Lurz is funded by the European Union (Health-e-Child Initiative); Drs Coats, Deanfield, and Bonhoeffer and S. Schievano are funded by the British Heart Foundation. Dr Taylor is funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England.

Disclosures

Dr Bonhoeffer is a consultant to Medtronic and NuMed and has received honoraria and royalties for the device described. Drs Taylor and Khambadkone are consultants to Medtronic and have received honoraria. The remaining authors report no conflicts.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Kanter KR, Budde JM, Parks WJ, Tam VK, Sharma S, Williams WH, Fyfe DA. One hundred pulmonary valve replacements in children after relief of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 1801–1806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bielefeld MR, Bishop DA, Campbell DN, Mitchell MB, Grover FL, Clarke DR. Reoperative homograft right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 482–487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Askovich B, Hawkins JA, Sower CT, Minich LL, Tani LY, Stoddard G, Puchalski MD. Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit longevity: is it related to allograft size? Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84: 907–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Rodefeld MD, Vijay P, Turrentine MW. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with an allograft conduit in non-Ross patients: risk factors for allograft dysfunction and failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80: 655–663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Stark J, Bull C, Stajevic M, Jothi M, Elliott M, de Leval M. Fate of subpulmonary homograft conduits: determinants of late homograft failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 115: 506–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tweddell JS, Pelech AN, Frommelt PC, Mussatto KA, Wyman JD, Fedderly RT, Berger S, Frommelt MA, Lewis DA, Friedberg DZ, Thomas JP Jr, Sachdeva R, Litwin SB. Factors affecting longevity of homograft valves used in right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction for congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 102 (suppl III): III-130–III-135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Oosterhof T, Meijboom FJ, Vliegen HW, Hazekamp MG, Zwinderman AH, Bouma BJ, van Dijk AP, Mulder BJ. Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1478–1484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Peng LF, McElhinney DB, Nugent AW, Powell AJ, Marshall AC, Bacha EA, Lock JE. Endovascular stenting of obstructed right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits: a 15-year experience. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2598–2605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Powell AJ, Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB. Prolongation of RV-PA conduit life span by percutaneous stent implantation: intermediate-term results. Circulation. 1995; 92: 3282–3288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fogelman R, Nykanen D, Smallhorn JF, McCrindle BW, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Endovascular stents in the pulmonary circulation: clinical impact on management and medium-term follow-up. Circulation. 1995; 92: 881–885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bove EL, Byrum CJ, Thomas FD, Kavey RE, Sondheimer HM, Blackman MS, Parker FB Jr. The influence of pulmonary insufficiency on ventricular function following repair of tetralogy of Fallot: evaluation using radionuclide ventriculography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983; 85: 691–696.[Abstract]
  12. Carvalho JS, Shinebourne EA, Busst C, Rigby ML, Redington AN. Exercise capacity after complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot: deleterious effects of residual pulmonary regurgitation. Br Heart J. 1992; 67: 470–473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, Siu SC, Hokanson JS, Poile C, Rosenthal M, Nakazawa M, Moller JH, Gillette PC, Webb GD, Redington AN. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet. 2000; 356: 975–981.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Saliba Z, Merckx J, Aggoun Y, Bonnet D, Acar P, Le Bidois J, Sidi D, Kachaner J. Percutaneous replacement of pulmonary valve in a right-ventricle to pulmonary-artery prosthetic conduit with valve dysfunction. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1403–1405.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Khambadkone S, Coats L, Taylor A, Boudjemline Y, Derrick G, Tsang V, Cooper J, Muthurangu V, Hegde SR, Razavi RS, Pellerin D, Deanfield J, Bonhoeffer P. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in humans: results in 59 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1189–1197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Therrien J, Warnes C, Daliento L, Hess J, Hoffmann A, Marelli A, Thilen U, Presbitero P, Perloff J, Somerville J, Webb GD. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference 2001 update: recommendations for the management of adults with congenital heart disease part III. Can J Cardiol. 2001; 17: 1135–1158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Yock PG, Popp RL. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation. 1984; 70: 657–662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Joyce JJ, Hwang EY, Wiles HB, Kline CH, Bradley SM, Crawford FA Jr. Reliability of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography during tetralogy of Fallot repair. Echocardiography. 2000; 17: 319–327.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Schievano S, Migliavacca F, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Carminati M, Wilson N, Deanfield JE, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology. 2007; 242: 490–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rome JJ, Keane JF, Perry SB, Spevak PJ, Lock JE. Double-umbrella closure of atrial defects: initial clinical applications. Circulation. 1990; 82: 751–758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Nagm AM, Moore JW. Balloon sizing of pulmonary branch stenosis: a useful method to guide stent implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003; 15: 437–438.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sridharan S, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Taylor AM, Bonhoeffer P. Images in cardiovascular medicine: transcatheter right ventricular outflow tract intervention: the risk to the coronary circulation. Circulation. 2006; 113: e934–e935.[Free Full Text]
  23. Maheshwari S, Bruckheimer E, Nehgme RA, Fahey JT, Kholwadwala D, Hellenbrand WE. Single coronary artery complicating stent implantation for homograft stenosis in tetralogy of Fallot. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997; 42: 405–407.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Nordmeyer J, Khambadkone S, Coats L, Schievano S, Lurz P, Parenzan G, Taylor A, Lock J, Bonhoeffer P. Risk stratification, systematic classification and anticipatory strategies for stent fractures after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1392–1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Garty Y, Veldtman G, Lee K, Benson L. Late outcomes after pulmonary valve balloon dilatation in neonates, infants and children. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005; 17: 318–322.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Schievano S, Coats L, Migliavacca F, Norman W, Frigiola A, Deanfield J, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM. Variations in right ventricular outflow tract morphology following repair of congenital heart disease: implications for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007; 9: 687–695.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW, Meijboom FJ, van Dijk AP, Spijkerboer AM, Bouma BJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Mulder BJ. Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2007; 116: 545–551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Therrien J, Siu SC, McLaughlin PR, Liu PP, Williams WG, Webb GD. Pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: are we operating too late? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1670–1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ghez O, Tsang VT, Frigiola A, Coats L, Taylor A, Van Doorn C, Bonhoeffer P, De Leval M. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction for pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: preliminary results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 31: 654–658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dave HH, Buechel ER, Dodge-Khatami A, Kadner A, Rousson V, Bauersfeld U, Pretre R. Early insertion of a pulmonary valve for chronic regurgitation helps restoration of ventricular dimensions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80: 1615–1620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Gengsakul A, Harris L, Bradley TJ, Webb GD, Williams WG, Siu SC, Merchant N, McCrindle BW. The impact of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair: a matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 32: 462–468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

After the first transcatheter valve implantation in 2000, a new field in interventional cardiology developed. New techniques evolved rapidly, with significant improvement in outcomes. We assessed our results after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation over a time frame of 6 years from the first to the 155th patient. The aim of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation was to prolong the lifespan of conduits, which were surgically placed from the right ventricle to the pulmonary artery. Because of the limited longevity of conduits, the majority of patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction traditionally undergo multiple open heart operations for conduit replacement. We show that percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation successfully restores conduit function with a low procedural complication rate. Explantation-free survival 5 years after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is >70%. This prolonged conduit lifespan should reduce the number of multiple open heart operations over the total lifespan of children and young adults with congenital heart disease and potentially improve life expectancy of these patients. As with all new procedures, whether surgical or interventional, the impact of the learning curve on a novel technique must be recognized. Therefore, we divided our patient population into a cohort consisting of the first 50 patients and a second cohort representing the later experience of 105 patients. In our experience, explantation-free survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in the second cohort. The impact of a learning curve on clinical results of new interventional procedures is of importance, especially if interventions and devices are compared with conventional therapies.


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1909. [Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/15/1964    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735779v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lurz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonhoeffer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lurz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonhoeffer, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery
Right arrowRelated Article