Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:421-428
Published online before print December 24, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.725275
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/3/421    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.725275v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:421-428.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Medicine

Dietary {alpha}-Lipoic Acid Supplementation Inhibits Atherosclerotic Lesion Development in Apolipoprotein E–Deficient and Apolipoprotein E/Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Deficient Mice

Wei-Jian Zhang, MD, PhD; Karyn E. Bird, DVM, PhD; Timothy S. McMillen, PhD; Renee C. LeBoeuf, PhD; Tory M. Hagen, PhD; Balz Frei, PhD

From the Linus Pauling Institute (W.-J.Z., T.M.H., B.F.) and Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine (K.E.B.), Oregon State University, Corvallis, and Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition (T.S.M., R.C.L.), Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Correspondence to Wei-Jian Zhang, MD, PhD, or Balz Frei, PhD, Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, 571 Weniger Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail weijian.zhang{at}oregonstate.edu or balz.frei@oregonstate.edu

Received October 11, 2006; accepted October 31, 2007.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Vascular inflammation and lipid deposition are prominent features of atherosclerotic lesion formation. We have shown previously that the dithiol compound {alpha}-lipoic acid (LA) exerts antiinflammatory effects by inhibiting tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}– and lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial and monocyte activation in vitro and lipopolysaccharide-induced acute inflammatory responses in vivo. Here, we investigated whether LA inhibits atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E–deficient (apoE–/–) and apoE/low-density lipoprotein receptor–deficient mice, 2 well-established animal models of human atherosclerosis.

Methods and Results— Four-week–old female apoE–/– mice (n=20 per group) or apoE/low-density lipoprotein receptor–deficient mice (n=21 per group) were fed for 10 weeks a Western-type chow diet containing 15% fat and 0.125% cholesterol without or with 0.2% (wt/wt) R,S-LA or a normal chow diet containing 4% fat without or with 0.2% (wt/wt) R-LA, respectively. Supplementation with LA significantly reduced atherosclerotic lesion formation in the aortic sinus of both mouse models by {approx}20% and in the aortic arch and thoracic aorta of apoE–/– and apoE/low-density lipoprotein receptor–deficient mice by {approx}55% and 40%, respectively. This strong antiatherogenic effect of LA was associated with almost 40% less body weight gain and lower serum and very low-density lipoprotein levels of triglycerides but not cholesterol. In addition, LA supplementation reduced aortic expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines and aortic macrophage accumulation. These antiinflammatory effects of LA were more pronounced in the aortic arch and the thoracic aorta than in the aortic sinus, reflecting the corresponding reductions in atherosclerosis.

Conclusions— Our study shows that dietary LA supplementation inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation in 2 mouse models of human atherosclerosis, an inhibition that appears to be due to the "antiobesity," antihypertriglyceridemic, and antiinflammatory effects of LA. LA may be a useful adjunct in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic vascular diseases.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • cell adhesion molecules • inflammation • obesity • triglycerides


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease initiated by the interaction of circulating monocytes with activated endothelial cells, resulting in monocyte recruitment to the arterial wall.1–3 Once in the subendothelial space of the intima, the monocytes differentiate into macrophages and, on scavenger receptor–mediated uptake and phagocytosis of oxidatively modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL), are transformed into lipid-laden foam cells, which are the hallmark of the early atherosclerotic fatty streak.

Clinical Perspective p 428

The initial monocyte-endothelial interactions are triggered by local expression of cellular adhesion molecules by the endothelium, including vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Studies in experimental animals and humans have shown increased expression of adhesion molecules and MCP-1 in developing and established atherosclerotic lesions.4–6 Conversely, genetic deficiencies of adhesion molecules, MCP-1, or TNF{alpha} in mice are associated with decreased atherosclerosis.7–10 The early atherosclerotic events and the initiation of lesion formation appear particularly dependent on VCAM-1.7 Human studies also demonstrated that increased plasma levels of soluble VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 are correlated with clinical manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis.11 Thus, inhibition of monocyte-endothelial interactions may be an effective strategy to prevent or treat atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

Recent data from experimental and clinical studies indicate that {alpha}-lipoic acid (LA; 1,2-dithiolane-3-pentanoic acid) acts as an antiinflammatory agent that may help prevent cardiovascular disease.12–17 LA is found in the human diet and is available in the United States as a dietary supplement in its natural R (D) form or racemic R,S (D,L) mixture. In addition to its antiinflammatory effects, LA plays an important role in mitochondrial energy metabolism, stimulates insulin signaling and glutathione synthesis, and has antioxidant properties.18–21 LA has been used safely in patients with diabetes mellitus and has been shown to significantly improve diabetic neurovascular and metabolic complications.22 We have shown that LA exerts antiinflammatory effects by inhibiting TNF{alpha}-induced expression of adhesion molecules and MCP-1 and adherence of monocytes to human aortic endothelial cells.16 Furthermore, we have recently found that LA inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced synthesis of MCP-1 and TNF{alpha} in monocytes in vitro and acute inflammatory responses in vivo by activating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting activation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B, the central transcription factor orchestrating the inflammatory response.17 However, the potential effect of LA on atherosclerosis is unknown. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to determine whether dietary supplementation with LA inhibits atherosclerotic lesion development in apolipoprotein E–deficient (apoE–/–) and apoE/LDL receptor–deficient (apoE/LDLR–/–) mice, 2 well-established animals models of human atherosclerosis.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
A full description of all Methods can be found in the online-only Data Supplement.

Animals and Experimental Procedures
Female C57BL/6, apoE–/–, and apoE/LDLR–/– mice on a C57BL/6 background at 4 to 5 weeks of age and weighing 12 to 15 g were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me). All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Oregon State University Institute Animal Care and Use Committee.

For experiments, apoE–/– mice were fed ad libitum a Western-type chow diet (No. 311372, Dyets Inc, Bethlehem, Pa) containing 15% hydrogenated coconut oil and 0.125% cholesterol without (control) or with 0.2% (wt/wt) R,S-LA (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo). ApoE/LDLR–/– mice were fed ad libitum Purina 5001 chow diet (Dyets No. 611000) containing 4% hydrogenated coconut oil without (control) or with 0.2% (wt/wt) R-LA (a gift from Dr Hans Tritschler, Viatris Inc, Frankfurt, Germany). Pair feeding of apoE/LDLR–/– mice was accomplished by measuring food intake of the LA-treated mice daily and then providing the same amount of food without LA to pair-fed control mice. For comparison, a group of C57BL/6 mice was fed ad libitum Purina 5001 chow diet containing 4% hydrogenated coconut oil without LA. At the end of the 10-week treatment period, the animals were killed, and heart and aorta were collected and processed as described below. Blood was collected and serum samples were prepared and stored at –80°C until analysis.

Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins
Serum total cholesterol was determined with a colorimetric kit (Diagnostic Chemicals Ltd, Oxford, Conn). Serum triglycerides were determined colorimetrically (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind). Serum lipoproteins were separated by high-resolution size exclusion/fast protein liquid chromatography (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB, Piscataway, NJ).

Analysis of Atherosclerotic Lesions
Aortic Sinus Lesions
Atherosclerotic lesions were quantified at the aortic sinus as described.23 The aortic sinus sections were prepared and stained with Movat’s stain.24 Quantification of atherosclerotic lesion areas was performed with a Leica microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and computer-assisted image analysis program (Image Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, Md).

Aortic Arch and Thoracic Aorta Lesions
Whole aortic atherosclerotic lesions were quantified as described.25,26 The aorta was opened in situ longitudinally along the ventral midline and pinned flat on a black wax surface. The images of the aorta were captured with a Nikon digital camera (Coolpix 990; Nikon Instruments Inc, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a Nikon stereo microscope. The total aortic surface and atherosclerotic lesion areas were analyzed en face by computerized quantitative morphometry (Image Pro Plus).

Immunohistochemistry
Aortic sinus sections were processed with the Cell and Tissue Staining Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Universal LSAB+ Kit (Dako Inc, Carpinteria, Calif). Primary antibodies were as follows: goat polyclonal anti-mouse VCAM-1 (R&D Systems), goat polyclonal anti-mouse ICAM-1 (R&D Systems), rat monoclonal anti-mouse Mac-2 (Cedarlane Laboratories, Ontario, Canada), rabbit polyclonal anti-human von Willebrand factor (Dako), and mouse monoclonal anti-chicken smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif).

Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for Analysis of Aortic mRNA Levels
Total RNA was isolated from aortas with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif). cDNA synthesis was performed with the high-capacity cDNA archive kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif). All TaqMan primers and probes for mouse VCAM-1, ICAM-1, MCP-1, TNF{alpha}, IL-6, CD68, and GAPDH were purchased as Assays on Demand from Applied Biosystems.

Statistical Analysis
Data were calculated as mean±SEM and analyzed by unpaired Student t test. Statistical significance was accepted at P<0.05.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
LA Lowers Body Weight Gain in ApoE–/– and ApoE/LDLR–/– Mice
ApoE–/– mice were fed ad libitum a Western-type, high-fat/high-cholesterol diet without (control) or with 0.2% (wt/wt) R,S-LA for 10 weeks. ApoE/LDLR–/– mice were fed ad libitum a normal chow diet supplemented with 0.2% (w/w) R-LA, and control apoE/LDLR–/– mice were pair fed the same daily amounts of chow without LA. Body weight was assessed before and at the end of the treatment period. Initial body weights did not differ between control and LA-treated animals, and all animals gained weight during the 10-week period. However, final body weights and hence body weight gain were significantly lower in the LA-supplemented mice than the corresponding non–LA-supplemented control animals (Figure 1). Body weight gain of apoE–/– mice was 8.84±0.46 g in controls and 5.35±0.29 g in LA-treated animals (P<0.05; n=20 animals per group) (Figure 1). For apoE/LDLR–/– mice, body weight gain was 5.87±0.14 g in the control group and 3.63±0.21 g in the LA-treated group (P<0.05; n=21 per group). This result is particularly remarkable because the apoE/LDLR–/– control mice were pair fed with the corresponding LA-supplemented animals, yet the latter still gained significantly less weight.


Figure 1188480
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. LA lowers body weight gain in apoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice. ApoE–/– mice fed a Western-type chow diet containing 15% hydrogenated coconut oil and 0.125% cholesterol and apoE/LDLR–/– mice fed a normal chow diet containing 4% hydrogenated coconut oil were supplemented without (black bars) or with (gray bars) 0.2% (wt/wt) LA for 10 weeks as described in Methods. The animals were weighed before and at the end of the treatment period, and weight gain was determined. Data shown are mean±SEM of 20 apoE–/– and 21 apoE/LDLR–/– mice in each group. *P<0.05 vs control animals.

LA Lowers Serum Triglycerides but Not Cholesterol in ApoE–/– and ApoE/LDLR–/– Mice
At the end of the treatment period, serum triglycerides were much higher in apoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice than in wild-type C57BL/6 mice (P<0.001) (Figure 2A). However, serum triglycerides were significantly lower in apoE–/– mice fed 0.2% LA (132±13 mg/dL) than non–LA-fed apoE–/– mice (219±21 mg/dL; P<0.05; n=20 per group) (Figure 2A). Serum triglycerides also were lower in apoE/LDLR–/– mice fed 0.2% LA (95±8 mg/dL) compared with control animals (116±7 mg/dL), although this difference did not quite reach statistical significance (P=0.058; n=21 per group) (Figure 2A).


Figure 2188480
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effects of LA on serum triglycerides (A) and cholesterol (B) in apoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice. ApoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice were treated without (black bars) or with (gray bars) LA as described for Figure 1. Wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were fed a normal chow diet containing 4% hydrogenated coconut oil. Serum concentrations of triglycerides and cholesterol were determined as described in Methods. Data shown are mean±SEM of 5 wild-type, 20 apoE–/–, and 21 apoE/LDLR–/– mice in each group. *P<0.05 vs control animals.

Serum total cholesterol in control apoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice was increased {approx}9- and 7-fold, respectively, compared with wild-type C57BL/6 mice (P<0.001) (Figure 2B). LA treatment did not affect cholesterol levels in apoE–/– mice (Figure 2B). A significant increase in serum total cholesterol was observed in apoE/LDLR–/– mice fed LA (800±43 mg/dL) compared with non–LA-fed controls (668±26 mg/dL; P<0.05; n=21 per group) (Figure 2B).

Serum lipoprotein distribution was almost identical in control and LA-fed apoE/LDLR–/– mice (Figure 3). The LA-treated group had lower total serum triglycerides, as also suggested by the data in Figure 2A, and fast protein liquid chromatography analysis indicated that this difference was due mainly to lower triglyceride levels in very LDL (VLDL) and to some degree LDL (Figure 3A). Conversely, the LA-treated group exhibited higher total serum cholesterol levels, confirming the data in Figure 2B, and this excess cholesterol was contained in the VLDL fraction (Figure 3B). These data indicate that LA treatment of apoE/LDLR–/– mice increased cholesterol and decreased triglyceride content of VLDL.


Figure 3188480
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effects of LA on serum lipoprotein profile in apoE/LDLR–/– mice. ApoE/LDLR–/– mice were treated without (•) or with ({circ}) LA as described for Figure 1. Serum was collected and lipoproteins were separated by fast protein liquid chromatography with a Superose 6 column as described in Methods. Concentrations of triglycerides (A) and cholesterol (B) were determined colorimetrically and normalized to total serum levels. Fractions 12 to 15 contain VLDL; fractions 16 to 24, LDL; and fractions 25 to 30, high-density lipoprotein.

LA Inhibits Atherosclerotic Lesion Formation in ApoE–/– and ApoE/LDLR–/– Mice
By the end of the 10-week treatment period, apoE–/– mice fed the high-fat/high-cholesterol diet and apoE/LDLR–/– mice fed the normal chow diet had developed widespread atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic sinus, aortic arch, and thoracic aorta (Figure 4A and 4C). Fatty streaks and more advanced lesions that covered a significant portion of the luminal surface and contained extracellular cholesterol deposits were observed in the aortic sinus of both mouse models (Figure 4A). LA supplementation significantly reduced aortic sinus lesion formation by 22% in both apoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice (Figure 4A and 4B). The lesion areas in apoE–/– mice were 175.8±11.2 µm2x103 in the control group and 138.0±14.1 µm2x103 in the LA-supplemented group (P<0.05; n=20 per group). In apoE/LDLR–/– mice, the aortic sinus lesions were 124.4±11.5 µm2x103 in the control group and 96.2±7.5 µm2x103 in the LA-treated group (P<0.05; n=21 per group). These data are similar to those of a recent study showing that 0.165% (wt/wt) LA fed to apoE–/– mice for 16 weeks reduced aortic sinus lesions by {approx}25%.27


Figure 4188480
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. LA inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation in the aortic sinus (A and B) and the aortic arch and thoracic aorta (C and D) of apoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice. ApoE–/– and apoE/LDLR–/– mice were treated without or with LA as described for Figure 1. Aortas and hearts were prepared as described in Methods. A, Cross sections of the aortic sinus stained with Movat’s stain (muscle fibers are stained red; ground substance and mucin, blue; collagen and reticular fibers, yellow; elastic fibers, black; and proteoglycans, gray-blue). Images a, b, and c are representative of 3 control apoE–/– mice; images d, e, and f are of 3 LA-treated apoE–/– mice. Magnification x50. B, Total sinus lesion areas in control (black bars) and LA-treated (gray bars) mice. Data shown are mean±SEM of 20 apoE–/– and 21 apoE/LDLR–/– mice in each group. C, Pinned-out whole aortas from 1 representative animal of each group showing surface lesions (white areas). D, Total aortic surface lesion areas in control (black bars) and LA-treated (gray bars) mice. Data shown are mean±SEM of 10 apoE–/– and 9 apoE/LDLR–/– mice in each group. *P<0.05 vs control animals.

The extent of atherosclerosis was further determined using en face analysis of the aorta. LA supplementation significantly reduced atherosclerotic lesion development in the aortic arch and thoracic aorta by 54% in apoE–/– mice and 39% in apoE/LDLR–/– mice compared with non–LA-treated control animals (P<0.05; n=9 to 10 per group) (Figure 4C and 4D). The results for the LA-fed apoE/LDLR–/– mice are remarkable because the control animals had lower serum cholesterol levels (Figure 2B) and were pair fed to eliminate possible differences in food intake as a confounding factor.

LA Reduces Aortic Expression of Adhesion Molecules and Proinflammatory Cytokines in ApoE/LDLR–/– Mice
Different cell types in the lesion areas of the aortic sinus were first identified by immunohistochemical staining for endothelial cells (von Willebrand factor), smooth muscle cells (smooth muscle {alpha}-actin), and macrophages (Mac-2) (Figure I of the online-only Data Supplement). To investigate whether LA reduced vascular inflammation, endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 protein expression was assessed. LA supplementation slightly but significantly reduced VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression by 17% and 12%, respectively, in the aortic sinus of apoE/LDLR–/– mice compared with non–LA-treated control animals (P<0.05; n=6 per group) (Figure 5A and 5B).


Figure 5188480
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. LA reduces protein levels of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 but not Mac-2 in the aortic sinus of apoE/LDLR–/– mice. ApoE/LDLR–/– mice were treated without or with LA as described for Figure 1. Immunohistochemical staining of the aortic sinus was performed as described in Methods. A, Cross sections of the aortic sinus immunostained (red) for VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 (arrows), as well as for Mac-2, in 1 representative animal per group. Magnification x50. B, Total luminal surface staining for VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in the aortic sinus of control (black bars) and LA-treated (gray bars) mice. C, Total lesion staining for Mac-2 in the aortic sinus of control and LA-treated mice. Data shown in B and C are mean±SEM of 6 apoE/LDLR–/– mice in each group. *P<0.05 vs control animals.

Furthermore, we assessed inflammatory gene expression in whole aortas of apoE/LDLR–/– mice. Aortic mRNA levels of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, TNF{alpha}, and IL-6 were increased 8.7±0.9-, 4.1±0.5-, 5.3±0.4-, and 8.4±2.3-fold, respectively, in control apoE/LDLR–/– mice compared with wild-type C57BL/6 mice (P<0.01; n=6 per group). LA supplementation strongly reduced these mRNA levels by 44% (VCAM-1), 65% (ICAM-1), 63% (TNF{alpha}), and 100% (IL-6) (P<0.05 versus non–LA-treated apoE/LDLR–/– mice; n=6 per group) (Figure 6). MCP-1 mRNA levels were increased 3.1-fold in apoE/LDLR–/– mice compared with wild-type animals and reduced nonsignificantly by {approx}40% with LA treatment (data not shown).


Figure 6188480
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. LA reduces mRNA levels of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, TNF{alpha}, IL-6, and CD68 in whole aorta of apoE/LDLR–/– mice. ApoE/LDLR–/– and wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were treated without (black bars) or with (gray bars) LA as described for Figure 2. Total RNA was isolated from aorta, and VCAM-1, ICAM-1, TNF{alpha}, IL-6, and CD68 mRNA levels were quantified with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction as described in Methods. After normalization to the internal control gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, results for each target gene were calculated as fold of WT control. Data shown are mean±SEM of 6 apoE/LDLR–/– mice in each group. *P<0.05 vs control animals.

LA Reduces Macrophage Accumulation in Whole Aorta of ApoE/LDLR–/– Mice
Extensive staining for the macrophage marker Mac-2 was observed in aortic sinus lesions of control apoE/LDLR–/– mice, indicating that most of these lesions comprised macrophage-derived foam cells (Figure 5A). However, no significant difference was present in sinus lesion macrophage content of control and LA-treated animals (33.1±3.5% and 29.8±2.2%, respectively; P>0.05; n=6 per group) (Figure 5C).

mRNA levels of CD68, a macrophage-specific marker, were increased 14.4±2.6-fold in whole aortas of control apoE/LDLR–/– mice compared with wild-type C57BL/6 mice (Figure 6). LA supplementation significantly reduced aortic CD68 mRNA levels by 48% (P<0.05 versus non–LA-treated animals; n=6 per group). Taken together, the data in Figures 4 through 6UpUp strongly suggest that LA inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation by inhibiting expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines and monocyte recruitment to the arterial wall.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrates that dietary supplementation with LA inhibits atherosclerotic lesion development in 2 widely accepted mouse models of human atherosclerosis. The antiatherogenic effect of LA was associated with "antiobesity," antihypertriglyceridemic, and antiinflammatory effects (ie, reduced body weight gain, serum triglycerides, aortic expression of cellular adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines, and aortic macrophage accumulation).

The antiobesity effect of LA is consistent with previous data showing that LA effectively lowered body weight gain and adipose fat mass in C57BL/6J mice28 and genetically obese Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats.29,30 OLETF rats are leptin resistant,31 similar to most obese humans,32 yet LA was effective in treating obesity in these rats. The reduction in body weight gain by LA appears to be due to suppression of hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in reduced appetite and food intake and increased energy expenditure.29 It is possible that LA activates AMP-activated protein kinase in other tissues, switching on catabolic pathways such as fatty acid oxidation, lipolysis, and glycolysis.33,34 The decrease in food consumption could not be attributed to taste aversion because intraperitoneal injection of LA had virtually the same effect on food intake as oral LA.28 In our study, the apoE/LDLR–/– control mice were pair fed with the corresponding LA-supplemented mice, yet the latter still gained less weight, suggesting that the LA-induced reduction in body weight gain in these animals may have been due mainly to increased catabolism and energy expenditure. Given the evidence that a strong link exists between obesity and atherosclerosis35,36 and that the antiobesity effect of LA in our study was associated with less atherosclerosis, LA supplementation may be a promising approach to prevent weight gain and to lower cardiovascular disease risk in humans.

Furthermore, we observed that LA treatment lowered serum triglycerides in both mouse models, which is consistent with previous findings in diabetic rat models.30,37–39 For example, Segermann et al38 reported that intraperitoneal injections of LA caused a 45% decrease in serum triglycerides, and Ford and colleagues39 found that dietary supplementation with LA lowered plasma triglycerides by >50% in streptozotocin-diabetic rats without changing plasma total or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Dietary LA also was found to reduce accumulation of triglycerides in nonadipose tissue of OLETF rats such as skeletal muscle and pancreatic islets.30 Interestingly, Lee et al37 observed that LA treatment of OLETF rats completely reversed excessive accumulation of triglycerides in aortic endothelial cells and hence endothelial dysfunction.

The triglyceride-lowering effect of LA could be related to both reduced food consumption and increased catabolic activity mediated by AMP-activated protein kinase, as explained above. In addition, we recently observed that dietary LA supplementation prevented hypertriglyceridemia in Zucker diabetic fatty rats by downregulating gene expression of several hepatic enzymes involved in the de novo synthesis of fatty acids and triglycerides (R. Moreau, PhD, J.A. Butler, MS, and T.M.H., unpublished observation, 2007). The finding that LA supplementation lowers serum triglycerides has important implications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease because hypertriglyceridemia is an independent predictor of myocardial infarction and stroke.40–42 Strategies to reduce hypertriglyceridemia in patients with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or atherosclerotic vascular diseases have used pharmacological agents and dietary approaches, and LA may be added to that repertoire.

Interestingly, LA exerted different effects on serum total cholesterol levels in the 2 murine models in our study. LA treatment did not affect serum cholesterol levels in apoE–/– mice fed a high-fat/high-cholesterol diet but increased total cholesterol by {approx}20% in apoE/LDLR–/– mice fed a normal chow diet. Lipoprotein distribution showed nearly identical patterns in control and LA-fed apoE/LDLR–/– mice. Our data indicate that alterations in serum total cholesterol did not contribute to the reduction of atherosclerosis in LA-treated animals and suggest that LA may increase cholesterol and decrease triglycerides in VLDL.

Our observation that LA increased serum total cholesterol in apoE/LDLR–/– mice is inconsistent with previous findings. Angelucci and Mascitelli-Coriandol43 reported that LA decreased plasma cholesterol by 50% in rabbits. Similarly, Ivanov44 observed that dietary supplementation with LA reduced cholesterol and β-lipoproteins in serum and aortic tissue of rabbits with atherosclerosis, and Shih45 showed that LA decreased both serum total cholesterol and β-lipoproteins by {approx}40% in a Japanese quail model. In contrast, Kritchevsky46 found no cholesterol-lowering effect of LA supplementation. These observed discrepancies might be due to different animal models and LA doses used.

Inflammation and lipid accumulation have been recognized as prominent features of atherosclerosis.1,3 Ross1 observed that feeding an atherogenic diet to experimental animals induced adhesion of monocytes and other inflammatory cells to the arterial wall in a matter of days. Recruitment of monocytes to the arterial intima is dependent on the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, monocyte chemoattractants, and proinflammatory cytokines. Numerous studies have established that circulating markers of inflammation are predictive of atherosclerosis and resulting cardiovascular disease events.11 Thus, inhibition of vascular inflammation and monocyte-endothelial interactions is emerging as a novel strategy to prevent and treat atherosclerosis.

Several lines of evidence suggest that LA may exert antiinflammatory and hence antiatherosclerotic effects.12–17 In the present study, we found that LA strongly inhibited atherosclerotic lesion formation in the aortic arch and thoracic aorta of 2 murine models of human atherosclerosis and that this antiatherosclerotic effect of LA was associated with decreased expression of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, TNF{alpha}, and IL-6 and decreased macrophage accumulation in the arterial wall. Although these data cannot establish cause and effect, they strongly suggest that LA inhibits atherosclerotic lesion development, in part, by suppressing vascular inflammation and monocyte recruitment. The antiinflammatory effects of LA observed here also are consistent with our previous results showing that LA inhibits TNF{alpha}-induced expression of adhesion molecules and MCP-1 and adherence of monocytes to human aortic endothelial cells16 and suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in C57BL/6 mice.17 These studies also revealed a common underlying mechanism for the antiinflammatory effects of LA, ie, inhibition of nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation.16,17

The extent of the antiatherosclerotic effect of LA differed at different aortic sites. Thus, LA strongly inhibited atherosclerotic lesion formation in the aortic arch and thoracic aorta but had less of an effect in the aortic sinus. These observations are consistent with the stronger inhibitory effects of LA on VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression and macrophage accumulation in whole aorta than the aortic sinus and buttress the concept of a causal relationship between the antiinflammatory and antiatherosclerotic effects of LA. Furthermore, our findings are consistent with previous reports that probucol and other antioxidants fed to murine models of atherosclerosis are more effective at inhibiting atherosclerotic lesion formation at distal aortic sites than the aortic root.47,48

On possible limitations of our study, it should be noted that we were unable to detect LA in serum of mice at the end of the 10-week treatment period, probably because of the short half-life of LA in blood ({approx}30 minutes).19 LA rapidly breaks down into at least 5 main metabolites in rodents; however, little is known whether these metabolites, LA, or the reduced form of LA, dihydrolipoic acid, is the active agent in vivo.19 Another limitation is the relatively large dose of LA used. Because a 20-g mouse consumes {approx}3 g of chow per day, 0.2% (wt/wt) LA in the rodent diet on a kilogram-of-body-weight basis translates to {approx}20 g of LA for a 70-kg person. However, such direct extrapolation based on kilograms of body weight may be inappropriate because mice have an {approx}10-times-higher metabolic rate—and eat much more per kilogram of body weight—than humans. Therefore, the equivalent human dose may be {approx}2000 mg of LA per 70-kg person. Human clinical studies have used up to 1800 mg/d for 6 months, which was considered safe and did not cause significant side effects.22


*    Conclusion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study provides several important new findings: Dietary LA supplementation inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation in apoE- and apoE/LDLR-deficient mice, likely through mechanisms involving the antiobesity, antihypertriglyceridemic, and antiinflammatory effects of LA. LA supplementation may be a useful adjunct in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic vascular diseases.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

The work described here was supported by National Institutes of Health grants ES11542 (Dr Zhang), HL60886 (Dr Frei), and HL079382 (Dr LeBoeuf) and National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Center of Excellence grant AT002034 (Drs Frei, Zhang, and Hagen).

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusion
*References
 

  1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
  2. Østerud B, Bjørklid E. Role of monocytes in atherogenesis. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83: 1069–1112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002; 420: 868–874.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Li H, Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MA Jr, Libby P. An atherogenic diet rapidly induces VCAM-1, a cytokine-regulatable mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecule, in rabbit aortic endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993; 13: 197–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Poston RN, Haskard DO, Coucher JR, Gall NP, Johnson-Tidey RR. Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Pathol. 1992; 140: 665–673.[Abstract]
  6. Nelken NA, Coughlin SR, Gordon D, Wilcox JN. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human atheromatous plaques. J Clin Invest. 1991; 88: 1121–1127.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Cybulsky MI, Iiyama K, Li H, Zhu S, Chen M, Iiyama M, Davis V, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Connelly PW, Milstone DS. A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1255–1262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Nageh MF, Sandberg ET, Marotti KR, Lin AH, Melchior EP, Bullard DC, Beaudet AL. Deficiency of inflammatory cell adhesion molecules protects against atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 1517–1520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Boring L, Gosling J, Cleary M, Charo IF. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2–/– mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature. 1998; 394: 894–897.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Brånén L, Hovgaard L, Nitulescu M, Bengtsson E, Nilsson J, Jovinge S. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2137–2142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, Smith LC, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, Boerwinkle E. Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4219–4225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sola S, Mir MQ, Cheema FA, Khan-Merchant N, Menon RG, Parthasarathy S, Khan BV. Irbesartan and lipoic acid improve endothelial function and reduce markers of inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: results of the Irbesartan and Lipoic Acid in Endothelial Dysfunction (ISLAND) study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 343–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Melhem A, Stern M, Shibolet O, Israeli E, Ackerman Z, Pappo O, Hemed N, Rowe M, Ohana H, Zabrecky G, Cohen R, Ilan Y. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection via antioxidants: results of a phase I clinical trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005; 39: 737–742.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Cho YS, Lee J, Lee TH, Lee EY, Lee KU, Park JY, Moon HB. Alpha-lipoic acid inhibits airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 114: 429–435.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Mervaala E, Finckenberg P, Lapatto R, Muller DN, Park JK, Dechend R, Ganten D, Vapaatalo H, Luft FC. Lipoic acid supplementation prevents angiotensin II-induced renal injury. Kidney Int. 2003; 64: 501–508.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Zhang WJ, Frei B. {alpha}-Lipoic acid inhibits TNF{alpha}-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and adhesion molecule expression in human aortic endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 2423–2432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zhang WJ, Wei H, Hagen T, Frei B. Alpha-lipoic acid attenuates LPS-induced inflammatory responses by activating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 4077–4082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Packer L, Witt EH, Tritschler HJ. Alpha-lipoic acid as a biological antioxidant. Free Radic Biol Med. 1995; 19: 227–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Biewenga GP, Haenen GRMM, Bast A. The pharmacology of the antioxidant lipoic acid. Gen Pharmacol. 1997; 29: 315–331.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Smith AR, Shenvi SV, Widlansky M, Suh JH, Hagen TM. Lipoic acid as a potential therapy for chronic diseases associated with oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem. 2004; 11: 1135–1146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Suh JH, Shenvi SV, Dixon BM, Liu H, Jaiswal AK, Liu RM, Hagen TM. Decline in transcriptional activity of Nrf2 causes age-related loss of glutathione synthesis, which is reversible with lipoic acid. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 3381–3386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ziegler D. Thioctic acid for patients with symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy: a critical review. Treat Endocrinol. 2004; 3: 173–189.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Paigen B, Morrow A, Holmes PA, Mitchell D, Williams RA. Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic lesions in mice. Atherosclerosis. 1987; 68: 231–240.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Movat HZ. Demonstration of all connective tissue components in a single section. Arch Pathol. 1955; 60: 289–295.
  25. Palinski W, Ord V, Plump AS, Breslow JL, Steinberg D, Witztum JL. ApoE-deficient mice are a model of lipoprotein oxidation in atherogenesis: demonstration of oxidation-specific epitopes in lesions and high titers of autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-ly-sine in serum. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994; 14: 605–616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tangirala RK, Rubin EM, Palinski W. Quantitation of atherosclerosis in murine models: correlation between lesions in the aortic origin and in the entire aorta, and differences in the extent of lesions between sexes in LDL receptor-deficient and apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Lipid Res. 1995; 36: 2320–2328.[Abstract]
  27. Yi X, Maeda N. alpha-Lipoic acid prevents the increase in atherosclerosis induced by diabetes in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice fed high-fat/low-cholesterol diet. Diabetes. 2006; 55: 2238–2244.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Shen QW, Jones CS, Kalchayanand N, Zhu MJ, Du M. Effect of dietary alpha-lipoic acid on growth, body composition, muscle pH, and AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation in mice. J Anim Sci. 2005; 83: 2611–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kim MS, Park JY, Namkoong C, Jang PG, Ryu JW, Song HS, Yun JY, Namgoong IS, Ha J, Park IS, Lee IK, Viollet B, Youn JH, Lee HK, Lee KU. Anti-obesity effects of alpha-lipoic acid mediated by suppression of hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 727–733.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Song KH, Lee WJ, Koh JM, Kim HS, Youn JY, Park HS, Koh EH, Kim MS, Youn JH, Lee KU, Park JY. Alpha-lipoic acid prevents diabetes mellitus in diabetes-prone obese rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 326: 197–202.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Niimi M, Sato M, Yokote R, Tada S, Takahara J. Effects of central and peripheral injection of leptin on food intake and on brain Fos expression in the Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rat with hyperleptinaemia. J Neuroendocrinol. 1999; 11: 605–611.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Maffei M, Halaas J, Ravussin E, Pratley RE, Lee GH, Zhang Y, Fei H, Kim S, Lallone R, Ranganathan S, Kern PA, Friedman JM. Leptin levels in human and rodent: measurement of plasma leptin and ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects. Nat Med. 1995; 1: 1155–1161.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Towler MC, Hardie DG. AMP-activated protein kinase in metabolic control and insulin signaling. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 328–341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lee WJ, Song KH, Koh EH, Won JC, Kim HS, Park HS, Kim MS, Kim SW, Lee KU, Park JY. Alpha-lipoic acid increases insulin sensitivity by activating AMPK in skeletal muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 332: 885–891.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Eckel RH. Obesity in heart disease. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3248–3250.[Free Full Text]
  36. Rashid MN, Fuentes F, Touchon RC, Wehner PS. Obesity and the risk for cardiovascular disease. Prev Cardiol. 2003; 6: 42–47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Lee WJ, Lee IK, Kim HS, Kim YM, Koh EH, Won JC, Han SM, Kim MS, Jo I, Oh GT, Park IS, Youn JH, Park SW, Lee KU, Park JY. Alpha-lipoic acid prevents endothelial dysfunction in obese rats via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 2488–2494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Segermann J, Hotze A, Ulrich H, Rao GS. Effect of {alpha}-lipoic acid on the peripheral conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine and on serum lipid-, protein- and glucose levels. Arzneimittelforschung. 1991; 41: 1294–1298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ford I, Cotter MA, Cameron NE, Greaves M. The effects of treatment with {alpha}-lipoic acid or evening primrose oil on vascular haemostatic and lipid risk factors, blood flow, and peripheral nerve conduction in the streptozotocin-diabetic rat. Metabolism. 2001; 50: 868–875.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Gotto AM Jr. Triglyceride: the forgotten risk factor. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1027–1028.[Free Full Text]
  41. Gaziano JM, Hennekens CH, O’Donnell CJ, Breslow JL, Buring JE. Fasting triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and risk of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2520–2525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Haim M, Benderly M, Brunner D, Behar S, Graff E, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U. Elevated serum triglyceride levels and long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) registry. Circulation. 1999; 100: 475–482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Angelucci L, Mascitelli-Coriandol E. Anticholesterol activity of {alpha}-lipoic acid. Nature. 1958; 181: 911–912.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Ivanov VN. Effect of lipoic acid on tissue respiration in rabbits with experimental atherosclerosis. Cor Vasa. 1974; 16: 141–150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Shih JC. Atherosclerosis in Japanese quail and the effect of lipoic acid. Fed Proc. 1983; 42: 2494–2497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Kritchevsky D. Anticholesterol activity of {alpha}-lipoic acid. Nature. 1958; 182: 396.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Witting PK, Pettersson K, Letters J, Stocker R. Site-specific antiatherogenic effect of probucol in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: E26–E33.
  48. Thomas SR, Leichtweis SB, Pettersson K, Croft KD, Mori TA, Brown AJ, Stocker R. Dietary cosupplementation with vitamin E and coenzyme Q (10) inhibits atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E gene knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 585–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

The recognition that inflammation is a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its clinical manifestations (eg, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and stroke) has significant implications for cardiovascular disease prevention, treatment, and research at the basic, clinical, and population levels. It is now clear that chronic inflammatory processes and immune mechanisms contribute to the development of atherosclerosis at all stages of the disease. Obesity and hyperlipidemia, as risk factors for atherosclerosis, also are strongly linked to increased vascular inflammation. The present study provides several important new findings: Dietary {alpha}-lipoic acid supplementation inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation in apolipoprotein E– and apolipoprotein E/low-density lipoprotein receptor–deficient mice, 2 widely accepted animal models of human atherosclerosis; and the inhibition of atherosclerosis by {alpha}-lipoic acid was associated with reduced weight gain, decreased plasma triglycerides, and decreased vascular inflammation. Although our results obtained in animal models cannot be directly extrapolated to humans, they strongly suggest that {alpha}-lipoic acid supplementation may be useful as an inexpensive but effective intervention strategy that targets inflammation, obesity, and hypertriglyceridemia, thereby reducing known risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis and other inflammatory vascular diseases in humans.


*    Footnotes
 
The contents of this work are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

The online-only Data Supplement, consisting of Methods and a figure, can be found with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.725275/DC1.


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 331-332. [Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/3/421    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.725275v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W.-J.
Right arrow