Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:720-731
Published online before print January 22, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671776
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/6/720    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671776v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yankelson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gepstein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yankelson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gepstein, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arrhythmia
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:720-731.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Cell Therapy for Modification of the Myocardial Electrophysiological Substrate

Lior Yankelson, BSc*; Yair Feld, MD, PhD*; Tal Bressler-Stramer, PhD; Ilanit Itzhaki, MSc; Irit Huber, PhD; Amira Gepstein, PhD; Doron Aronson, MD; Shimon Marom, MD, PhD{dagger}; Lior Gepstein, MD, PhD{dagger}

From the Sohnis Laboratory for Cardiac Electrophysiology and Regenerative Medicine (L.Y., Y.F., T.B.-S., I.I., I.H., A.G., L.G.), Minerva Center for Cell Biophysics (S.M.), and the Cardiology Department (Rambam Medical Center) (D.A., L.G.), Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Correspondence to Lior Gepstein, MD, PhD, Technion’s Faculty of Medicine, POB 9649, Haifa, 31096, Israel. E-mail mdlior{at}tx.technion.ac.il

Received August 24, 2004; accepted November 28, 2007.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Traditional antiarrhythmic pharmacological therapies are limited by their global cardiac action, low efficacy, and significant proarrhythmic effects. We present a novel approach for the modification of the myocardial electrophysiological substrate using cell grafts genetically engineered to express specific ionic channels.

Methods and Results— To test the aforementioned concept, we performed ex vivo, in vivo, and computer simulation studies to determine the ability of fibroblasts transfected to express the voltage-sensitive potassium channel Kv1.3 to modify the local myocardial excitable properties. Coculturing of the transfected fibroblasts with neonatal rat ventricular myocyte cultures resulted in a significant reduction (68%) in the spontaneous beating frequency of the cultures compared with baseline values and cocultures seeded with naive fibroblasts. In vivo grafting of the transfected fibroblasts in the rat ventricular myocardium significantly prolonged the local effective refractory period from an initial value of 84±8 ms (cycle length, 200 ms) to 154±13 ms (P<0.01). Margatoxin partially reversed this effect (effective refractory period, 117±8 ms; P<0.01). In contrast, effective refractory period did not change in nontransplanted sites (86±7 ms) and was only mildly increased in the animals injected with wild-type fibroblasts (73±5 to 88±4 ms; P<0.05). Similar effective refractory period prolongation also was found during slower pacing drives (cycle length, 350 to 500 ms) after transplantation of the potassium channels expressing fibroblasts (Kv1.3 and Kir2.1) in pigs. Computer modeling studies confirmed the in vivo results.

Conclusions— Genetically engineered cell grafts, transfected to express potassium channels, can couple with host cardiomyocytes and alter the local myocardial electrophysiological properties by reducing cardiac automaticity and prolonging refractoriness.


Key Words: action potentials • electrophysiology • gene therapy • ion channels • mapping


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cardiac arrhythmias account for significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. Traditional antiarrhythmic therapies are aimed at modifying the abnormal electrophysiological substrate by focal injury (surgery or radiofrequency catheter ablation),1 implantable devices,2,3 or pharmacotherapy. The latter approach is hampered by the relatively low efficacy of most antiarrhythmic agents and by their global cardiac action that may result in life-threatening proarrhythmic effects.4

Clinical Perspective p 731

Gene therapy has been suggested as a novel antiarrhythmic strategy.5,6 The feasibility of this innovative approach was established in several in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrating that manipulation of the expression of different ion channels or their modulators can be used to alter myocardial electrophysiological properties, providing a possible future therapeutic strategy for both tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias.5–12

In the present study, we evaluated an alternative approach that focuses on the transplantation of genetically engineered cell grafts. Using detailed in vitro, in vivo, and computer modeling studies, we demonstrated that fibroblasts, transfected to express different potassium channels, can couple with host cardiomyocytes and alter the local myocardial electrophysiological properties. This effect was manifested by the ability of the cell grafts to suppress cardiomyocyte automaticity in coculture experiments and to prolong the local myocardial refractory period (RP) in in vivo transplantation studies.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Expression System and Electrophysiological Recordings
The NIH-3T3 fibroblast line was stably transfected to express the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.3,13 the inward-rectifier potassium channel Kir2.1, or enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP).

Details regarding the creation of the lines and their electrophysiological characterization can be found in the expanded Methods section of the online Data Supplement.

Coculturing Experiments
To assess the effects of the transfected fibroblasts on the electrophysiological properties of cardiac tissue, we initially performed coculture experiments using primary cultures of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes.13 Details regarding the methodology of these experiments, immunostaining analysis, calcein dye transfer,14 and multielectrode mapping13 studies can be found in the expanded Methods section of the Data Supplement.

In Vivo Animal Studies
All studies were approved by the Animal Board and Safety Committee of Technion (Haifa, Israel).

Rat Model
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 to 250 g) were anesthetized (ketamine/xylazine), intubated, and ventilated. After left thoracotomy, 6x106 fibroblasts (nontransfected, n=8; or Kv1.3 expressing, n=10) were transplanted into the left ventricular myocardium with a 28-gauge needle (volume, 300 µL). A small suture was created at a nearby site to identify the site of transplantation. Cells were labeled with DAPI (Sigma, St Louis, Mo) or with 3,3'-dilinoleyloxa-carbocyanine perchlorate or 5- (and -6)- carboxyfluorescein diacetate (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, Calif). To prevent graft rejection, all animals received cyclosporin (10 mg · kg–1 · d–1) and methylprednisolone (2 mg · kg–1 · d–1).

Swine Model
Five pigs (20 to 30 kg) underwent right thoracotomy, after which 6x106 cells (in 300 µL medium) per injection site were transplanted in 7 different right ventricular locations. To prevent graft rejection, animals were treated with cyclosporine (10 mg · kg–1 · d–1), methylprednisolone (3 mg · kg–1 · d–1), and azathioprim (50 mg/d).

In Vivo Electrophysiological Study
The myocardial effective RP (ERP) was determined by epicardial ventricular pacing. To localize the stimulation effect to the site of cell grafting, we used custom-made intramyocardial thin electrodes (0.01-in electrodes, 1-mm tip-length exposure) with a bipolar distance of 1 mm. The stimulation protocol consisted of a train of 20 consecutive stimuli (S1) at a fixed cycle length, followed by a single premature stimulation (S2). The coupling interval of the premature stimulus was reduced in 10-ms steps until the ERP was reached (note that we did not use a lower limit for the coupling interval of the extrastimuli). The stimulation amplitude was set to twice the capture threshold, and ERP was determined as the average of 3 repeated measurements.

ERP was measured at the site of cell transplantation and at remote sites before and 7 days after cell grafting. Measurements were repeated after intraperitoneal injection of 9 µg/kg MTx. We chose to use margatoxin for the in vivo studies (instead of charybdotoxin) because of its equivalent Kv1.3 current blocking properties (Figure 1A) and its previously established in vivo pharmacokinetic properties.15 The grafting area was identified for the pacing studies by a slight discoloration on the epicardial surface. The stimulation site was tagged, and the presence of the transplanted cells was confirmed in histology. In some studies, we coinjected fluorescent microspheres or prelabeled the cells with the fluorescent tracer 3,3'- dilinoleyloxa-carbocyanine perchlorate. The intense fluorescent signal (see Figure I in the Data Supplement) confirmed the accurate localization of the grafted area for pacing.


Figure 1188678
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. A, Voltage-clamp recordings from the Kv1.3 fibroblast and blockade of the Kv1.3 current with MTx. B, The corresponding I-V curve. C, Tail current of the Kv1.3 channel. D, Voltage-clamp recording from a nonstransfected fibroblast. E, Voltage-clamp recording from the Kir2.1 fibroblast and blockade of the current with barium.

ERP measurements in pigs were performed similarly but with slower pacing cycle lengths (S1, 350 to 500 to ms). In addition to the Kv1.3 fibroblasts, we also assessed the effects of Kir2.1- and eGFP-expressing fibroblasts. ERP was measured at the site of cell transplantation, in remote sites, and after intramyocardial injection of MTx.

To assess the potential arrhythmogenic risk of the transplantation procedure, we performed programmed electric stimulation (n=4) using an electrophysiological catheter positioned in the right ventricle. The stimulation protocol consisted of 8 consecutive stimuli (S1) at a fixed cycle length (400 or 300 ms), followed by up to 3 consecutive premature stimulations (S2 through S4). The coupling interval of the 3 extrastimuli was reduced by 10-ms steps until ERP was reached.

Histological Examination
Details can be found in the online expanded Methods section.

Computer Simulation
A 1-dimensional numeric model (based on the Luo-Rudy model16 for action potential simulation) was used to simulate the effects of the engineered fibroblasts on coupled myocytes. Details can be found in the online Methods.

Statistical Analysis
All results are expressed as mean±SEM. For the coculture experiments, we used general linear model 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA to test the hypothesis that changes in the average beating rate over time varied among the 2 experimental groups (Kv1.3 fibroblasts and nontransfected fibroblasts). The model included the effects of treatment (representing the nonrepeated factor), time, and treatment-by-time interaction. The Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment was used to correct for the inflated risk of a type I error. The Bonferroni correction was used to assess the significance of predefined comparisons at specific time points. For the in vivo rat and swine experiments, repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess the effects of fibroblasts injection at different time points and after MTx application. For the in vivo swine studies comparing the effects of different engineered fibroblasts on ERP, 1-way ANOVA was used.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In Vitro Studies
Patch-Clamp Studies
Voltage-clamp studies of the transfected fibroblasts confirmed the robust expression of the Kv1.3 channel and its sensitivity to selective pharmacological blockade (Figure 1A and 1B). Because we hypothesized that the Kv1.3 fibroblasts would generate significant electrotonic interactions during the late repolarization and early postrepolarization phases and therefore could modify myocardial refractoriness and automaticity, we also analyzed the tail current properties of this channel (Figure 1C). Using a specific protocol, we noted a significant tail current for up to 100 ms after hyperpolarization. In contrast, we could not detect any significant currents in wild-type or eGFP-expressing fibroblasts (Figure 1D).

Connexin Immunostaining
A prerequisite for the ability of the engineered fibroblasts to modulate the electrophysiological properties of neighboring cardiomyocytes is the establishment of functional gap junctions. To assess for this ability, we first performed immunostaining analysis in fibroblast-cardiomyocyte cocultures. As can be seen in Figure 2A, the connexin43 (Cx43) immunosignal could be localized to the junction between the Kv1.3 fibroblasts and neighboring cardiomyocytes.


Figure 2188678
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Fibroblast-cardiomyocyte coupling in cocultures. A, Left, Identification of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts (green) and cardiomyocytes (red) by anti-Kv1.3 and anti-cTnI antibodies, respectively. Right, Positive Cx43 immunosignal (purple; superimposed on the differential interference contrast image) at the junction (red arrows) between fibroblasts (white arrow) and neighboring cardiomyocytes (yellow arrows). B, Calcein dye transfer between the preloaded fibroblasts (FB) and cocultured cardiomyocyte.

Calcein Dye Transfer
We next loaded the engineered fibroblasts with calcein and cocultured them with rat cardiomyocytes. Calcein is an intracellular dye that is diffusible only through gap junctions, and its transfer between cells is a standard technique for studying gap junction communication.14 Sequential microscopy revealed that by 3 hours a fluorescent signal could be observed in the cardiomyocytes adjacent to the loaded fibroblasts (Figure 2B, right), indicating the formation of functional gap junctions between the 2 cell types.

Microelectrode Array Mapping Studies
On the basis of the encouraging Cx43 immunostaining and calcein dye transfer results, we continued to assess the ability of the transfected fibroblasts to modify the excitable properties of cardiac tissue. Initially, possible changes in the spontaneous beating frequency of neonatal rat cardiomyocyte cultures were assessed after seeding of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that the treatment-by-time interaction effect was significant (P=0.04), reflecting the decrease in beating rate in the Kv1.3 fibroblast cocultures (Figure 3A). Although the spontaneous beating rate did not differ between the control (nontransfected fibroblasts; n=6) and study (n=6) groups at baseline (before fibroblast seeding; Figure 3A, day 0), we could start detecting a significant reduction in the beating rate in the Kv1.3 fibroblast cocultures by day 2. This negative chronotropic effect was maintained throughout the experiment (Figure 3A). To dissect the contribution of the Kv1.3 channel to the electrophysiological outcome, we applied the Kv1.3 blocker CTx. Application of CTx had a dose-related effect and resulted in complete reversal of the negative chronotropic effect when given at a dose of 100 nmol/L (Figure 3B). In contrast, CTx application had only minimal effects on the beating frequency in the control group.


Figure 3188678
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. A, Changes in the beating frequency in the nontransfected ({blacksquare}) and Kv1.3 fibroblast cocultures (•). *Bonferroni adjusted for 3 comparisons, P<0.05 vs baseline values (day 0) in the Kv1.3 fibroblast group; {dagger}P<0.01 for between-group comparison. B, Effect of escalating doses of CTx on the relative beating frequency of nontransfected ({blacksquare}) and Kv1.3 fibroblast (•) cocultures. The difference at baseline between the groups (*P=0.015) was fully reversible after application of 100 nmol/L CTx (P=NS). C, Changes in electrogram amplitude as a function of the distance of the recording electrodes from the Kv1.3 fibroblast patch. Left, The fluorescently labeled Kv1.3 fibroblasts were identified (arrow) as a fluorescent (white) patch. Other white spots in the image represent autofluorescent artifacts of cell debris. Middle, Superposition of the electrograms recorded from the area of interest. Right, Plot depicting electrogram amplitude as a function of the distance from the fibroblasts patch (note the inverse relationship in the logarithmic fit). D, Changes in electrogram amplitude as a function of the distance from the Kv1.3 fibroblasts before ({diamondsuit}) and after ({square}) CTx application. Middle, Examples of electrograms recorded at different distances from the fibroblast patch. Right, Plot depicting electrogram amplitude as a function of the distance from the fibroblasts patch.

We next assessed the spatial extent of the electrophysiological changes induced by the engineered fibroblasts. To this end, we performed coculture studies in which the Kv1.3 fibroblasts were labeled with a fluorescent tracer (to follow their location within the cocultures) and seeded as cell patches on top of primary cardiomyocyte cultures (Figure 3C and 3D, left). In our previous study,13 we noted that electrograms recorded from cardiomyocytes located directly beneath the Kv1.3 fibroblasts were characterized by significantly reduced amplitudes. Here, we assessed the effects of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts on electrograms recorded at increasing distances from the seeded fibroblasts. To avoid the possible competing effects of a number of nearby cell clusters, the analysis was performed only in cocultures in which the field of interest contained only 1 Kv1.3 fibroblast cell cluster. As can be seen in Figure 3C, the Kv1.3 fibroblasts significantly affected the electrogram amplitude (note the inverse relationship using a logarithmic fit) even at recording electrodes located far beyond the fibroblast area (up to 500 µm). Application of CTx resulted in a complete reversal of these electrophysiological changes. Note the conversion of the inverse logarithmic relationship into a straight line (Figure 3D), reflecting a greater increase in electrogram amplitude at sites closer to the fibroblasts.

In Vivo Studies
We next continued to evaluate the ability of the Kv1.3-expressing fibroblasts to modify the in vivo myocardial electrophysiological properties. To this end, possible changes in the ventricular ERP were evaluated in rats. Figure 4 depicts changes in the local ERP before and 1 week after cell grafting. Note that the ventricular ERP (S1–S1, 200 ms) was 60 ms before cell transplantation (Figure 4A) and increased to 170 ms at the site of cell grafting 7 days later (Figure 4B). Interestingly, this increase was partially reversed (to 100 ms) after local application of the Kv1.3 blocker MTx (Figure 4C).


Figure 4188678
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. A through C, Measurement of the rat ventricular ERP before cell grafting (A), 7 days after Kv1.3 fibroblast transplantation (B), and after MTx application (C). Top, The shortest coupled S1–S2 interval (arrows show stimulus) that still elicits a ventricular response; bottom, the following S1–S2 interval that fails to capture the ventricle (arrowhead shows ERP). D, Summary of the mean ERP values in the Kv1.3-expressing and the nontransfected fibroblast groups at baseline, after 7 days, after MTx application, and at a remote site. *P<0.01; {dagger}P<0.05.

Transplantation of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts increased ERP in all animals (n=10) from a baseline value of 84±8 to 154±13 ms (Bonferroni adjusted for 3 comparisons, P<0.01) 7 days later (Figure 4D). Administration of MTx resulted in a significant (P<0.01) decrease in ERP at the site of cell transplantation to 117±8 ms (Figure 4D). In contrast, ventricular ERP at remote sites did not differ (86±7 ms) from baseline values (P=0.66).

We next compared the effects of nontransfected fibroblasts. In this control group (n=8), we observed a mild increase in the local ERP at the site of cell grafting (from 73±5 to 88±4 ms; Bonferroni adjusted for 2 comparisons, P<0.05; Figure 4D). This increase in ERP, however, was much lower than that resulting from the transplantation of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts (154±13 ms; P<0.01; Figure 4D). As expected, this value did not change after administration of MTx (P=0.98; Figure 4D).

The presence of the transplanted cells at the pacing sites was confirmed in histology. The grafted cells were labeled before transplantation by the fluorescent tracer 3,3'-dilinoleyloxacarbocyanine diacetate or 5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate (green cells in Figure 5A) or DAPI (Figure 5B) and could later be detected in vivo. Alternatively, the grafted cells also could be detected using anti-Kv1.3 antibodies (Figure 5C). Gap junctions could occasionally be recognized at the interface between the grafted fibroblasts and host cardiomyocytes (Cx43 immunostaining in Figure 5B and 5C). Interestingly, we noted an increase in Cx43 expression in fibroblasts located close to host cardiomyocytes.


Figure 5188678
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Histological identification of the grafted cells. A, Identification of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts (prelabeled with 5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate; green) and host cardiomyocytes (cTnI immunostaining; red). Nuclei were counterstained with ToPro3 (blue). B, Cx43 immunostaining (green punctuate staining) at the junction (arrows) between host cardiomyocytes (cTnI staining; red) and the Kv1.3 fibroblasts (prelabeled with DAPI; blue). C, Left, High-resolution confocal image showing the spatial relationship between host cardiomyocytes (cTnI staining; red) and grafted fibroblasts (Kv1.3 staining; green). Right, Positive Cx43 immunosignal (blue; superimposed on the differential interference contrast image) at the junction between fibroblasts (yellow arrows) and cardiomyocytes (white arrows). D, Identification of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts (using anti-Kv1.3 antibodies; blue), cardiomyocytes (cTnI staining; red), and gap junctions (Cx43 staining; green) within the pig myocardium. E, Identification of the Kir2.1 fibroblasts (using anti–His-Tag antibodies; green) within the pig myocardium (red). F, Positive Cx43 immunosignal (red) at the junction between the grafted fibroblasts (anti–His-Tag; green) and host cardiomyocytes (anti-cTnI; blue). Right, Superposition of the left panel (signal intensity was reduced intentionally) on top of the corresponding differential interference contrast image.

In Vivo Effects in the Pig Ventricle
Because of the fast beating rate of the rat heart, we could evaluate the effects of cell grafting only at rapid stimulation rates (cycle length, 200 ms). To assess whether the grafted cells could increase refractoriness at more clinically relevant slower ventricular rates, we injected the Kv1.3 fibroblasts into sites in the pig right ventricular myocardium. Immunostaining of these hearts with anti-Kv1.3 antibodies confirmed the long-term survival of the grafted cells and the continuous expression of the transgene (Figure 5D).

Electrophysiological studies, conducted 7 days after cell grafting, revealed significant electrophysiological changes induced by the Kv1.3 fibroblasts (Figure 6). Note in the example in Figure 6B the increase in ERP at the site of cell transplantation to 250 ms (S1 cycle length, 400 ms) compared with a nontransplanted myocardial site (ERP, 190 ms; Figure 6A). This increase was partially reversed (ERP, 210 ms) after local application of MTx (Figure 6C). Grafting of the Kv1.3 fibroblasts resulted in a significant increase (P<0.05) in ERP at 3 different stimulation drives studied (S1 cycle lengths, 350, 400, and 500 ms) compared with nontransplanted areas (Figure 6D). The increase in ERP was reversible after local application of MTx (P<0.05; Figure 6D).


Figure 6188678
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. A through C, Measurements of pig ERP at a control remote ventricular site (A), at the site of Kv1.3 fibroblast transplantation (B), and after MTx administration (C). Top, Shortest S1–S2 interval that still elicits a ventricular activation; bottom, the following S1–S2 interval that fails to capture the ventricle (ERP). D, Summary of the changes in the ventricular ERP before and after MTx application at the sites of Kv1.3 fibroblast grafting and at control remote sites. Measurements were performed using 3 different cycle lengths (350, 400, and 500 ms). Bonferroni adjusted for 2 comparisons, *P<0.025 vs control sites; {dagger}P<0.025 vs MTx treatment.

To assess the arrhythmogenic potential of this procedure, we performed programmed ventricular electrical stimulation (up to 3 premature stimuli) in 4 animals. In none of these animals could we induce any ventricular arrhythmias.

We next assessed the electrophysiological effects of 2 additional types of genetically engineered fibroblasts. To determine the possible contribution of the transfection process per se, we established a fibroblast line that overexpresses eGFP. Similar to the wild-type fibroblasts in the rat studies, transplantation of the eGFP-expressing cells in pigs had only a mild effect on ERP (Figure 7C).


Figure 7188678
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. A and B, Measurements of pig ERP values at baseline (A) and 7 days after transplantation of the Kir2.1 fibroblasts (Fib; B). Top, The shortest S1–S2 interval that still elicits a ventricular activation; bottom, the following S1–S2 interval that fails to capture the ventricle (ERP). C, Summary of the ventricular ERP values after transplantation with the different cell types (Fib-GFP, Fib-Kv1.3, Fib-Kir2.1, and nontransplanted remote sites). *Bonferroni adjusted for 4 comparisons, P<0.01.

Because the Kv1.3 channel may affect different phases of the action potential (because of its rapid opening kinetics, lack of inactivation during phases 2 and 3, and significant tail current), we chose also to study fibroblasts overexpressing a potassium channel that will be active mainly during late phase 3 and phase 4 of the action potential (in a manner similar to the Kv1.3 tail current). We therefore created a fibroblasts line overexpressing the Kir2.1 channel.17 Voltage-clamp recordings from these transfected fibroblasts confirmed robust functional expression of this channel (Figure 1E).

Grafting of the Kir2.1 fibroblasts significantly prolonged the local ventricular ERP from a baseline value of 219±9 to 260±7 ms (P<0.01). Figure 7A and 7B depicts examples of the ERP measurements at the site of cell grafting before (Figure 7A) and 7 days after (Figure 7B) transplantation of the Kir2.1 fibroblasts. Immunostaining analysis confirmed the long-term survival of the cells, the continuous expression of the Kir2.1 transgene, and the formation of gap junctions with host cardiomyocytes (Figure 5E and 5F).

Figure 7C summarizes the effects of the different fibroblasts used in the swine study. Note that transplantation of the Kir2.1 fibroblasts and Kv1.3 fibroblasts resulted in the greatest prolongation of the local ERP and that these values were significantly higher than control remote sites and sites transplanted with the eGFP fibroblasts (all P<0.01).

Modeling Results
To attain further mechanistic insights into the electrophysiological changes induced by the transfected fibroblasts, we used a 1-dimensional numeric mathematical model simulating action potential propagation along a chain of 5 cardiomyocytes in which myocyte C is connected to the engineered fibroblast (online Figure II). The RP in these simulations was defined as the minimum interval between 2 consecutive stimuli applied to myocyte A that could be propagated to myocyte E. In the setup without a connecting fibroblast, the calculated RP was 375 ms (Figure 8A); it increased slightly to 425 ms (Figure 8B) when a nontransfected fibroblast was used. When myocyte C was connected to the Kv1.3 fibroblast, a larger increase in the RP was noted (500 ms; Figure 8C).


Figure 8188678
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. A through C, Measurements of the RP in the simulation without a coupled fibroblast (A) and with a nontransfected (B) or Kv1.3 (C) fibroblast. D, Simulated action potential morphologies in myocyte C (MyoC) and the attached fibroblast when connected to a nontransfected or the Kv1.3 fibroblast. Right, Magnification of the boxed area depicting the more hyperpolarized RMP of the cardiomyocyte connected to Kv1.3 fibroblast. E, Simulated action potential morphologies in myocyte C and the attached Kir2.1 fibroblast. Right, Magnification of the boxed area. F, Effect of the fibroblast surface area (Sfib) (normalized to the myocyte surface area [Smyo]) on the RP. G, Effect of the degree of fibroblast-cardiomyocyte resistance on the simulated RP.

Figure 8D shows the simulated action potential morphology of myocyte C when connected to the nontransfected and Kv1.3 fibroblasts. Also shown are the changes in membrane potential of the coupled fibroblast. Note that depolarization in myocyte C leads to depolarization of the connected fibroblast and opening of the Kv1.3 channels. The resulting outward current hyperpolarizes the fibroblast. The potential difference generated between the 2 cell types leads to the development of electrotonic currents (the fibroblast acting as a sink) that ultimately modulates different phases of the cardiomyocyte action potential. As can be seen in Figure 8D, these electrotonic interactions result in a reduction of the slope of phase 0, in reduced amplitude of the action potential, in shortening of the action potential duration (APD), in hyperpolarization of the resting membrane potential (RMP) during the early diastolic period (Figure 8D, right), and in an increase in the RP (Figure 8C). The latter 2 events stem from the Kv1.3 tail current, which acts to hyperpolarize the RMP and prevents initiation of a new action potential. Similar hyperpolarization of the RMP also was identified when simulating the effect of the Kir2.1 fibroblast (Figure 8E).

According to the aforementioned paradigm, the electrophysiological changes induced by the transplanted cells depend on the active (biophysical properties of the transfected channels) and passive properties of grafted and host cells. To assess the latter, we modeled the effects of changes in the fibroblast surface area (affecting cell capacitance; Figure 8F) and the degree of fibroblast-cardiomyocyte coupling (affecting intercellular resistance; Figure 8G). These studies demonstrated that by increasing the fibroblast surface area or improving the fibroblast-cardiomyocyte coupling, the fibroblast acts as a greater sink, further prolonging RP.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present study, we evaluated a new approach for the modification of the myocardial electrophysiological properties using genetically engineered cell grafts overexpressing specific ionic channels. Our results using fibroblasts transfected to express different potassium channels (the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.3 and the inward-rectifying Kir2.1 channel) demonstrate the validity of this concept by showing the ability of the cell grafts to reduce excitability and to prolong local refractoriness in ex vivo, in vivo, and computer simulation studies.

The observed changes in the local ventricular electrophysiological properties indicate the ability of the engrafted engineered fibroblasts to survive, to integrate with host tissue, and to modulate local excitability by generation of electrotonic currents with neighboring cardiomyocytes. The possibility of electric interactions between cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts was previously demonstrated by Rook et al,18 who showed morphological and functional coupling in cardiomyocyte-fibroblast pairs in vitro; by Fast at al,19 who reported on electric connections in cultured cardiomyocytes harboring fibroblasts; and by our previous report showing the ability of transfected fibroblasts to create local conduction blocks in coculture experiments.13 More recent studies showed the ability of fibroblasts to propagate electrical signals over extended distances (300 µm) in coculture experiments20 and to reduce the spontaneous beating frequency in cocultures21 and suggested an important in vivo role for cardiac fibroblasts in modulating the electrophysiological properties of the sinoatrial node.22

Interestingly, grafting of nontransfected fibroblasts in our study resulted in a mild but statistically significant effect on ERP in the in vivo rat studies (as also predicted by the modeling results; Figure 8B). Heterologous gap junction–mediated fibroblast-cardiomyocyte coupling has the potential to reduce cardiomyocyte excitability by direct membrane depolarization or by an electric sink effect.21,23,24 For example, Miragoli et al24 showed in a coculture study that myofibroblasts can significantly reduce cardiac tissue conduction velocity and maximal upstroke velocity, most probably because of gradual depolarization of the cardiomyocyte RMP. Similarly, Kizana et al21 showed a reduction in the spontaneous beating rate of cardiomyocyte cultures when grown on top of wild-type fibroblast cell layer but not if cultured on connexin knockout fibroblasts. An alternative explanation may be structural changes induced by the grafted wild-type fibroblasts (fibrosis, volume effect of the grafted cells themselves, etc) that may lead to interruption of the normal myocardial architecture and consequentially to changes in the local electrophysiological properties. Such structural changes may be the underlying mechanism in a recent report showing changes in the atrioventricular node properties after transplantation of transforming growth factor-β–simulated fibroblasts.25

The electrophysiological changes induced by the Kv1.3 fibroblasts, in contrast to those of the control fibroblasts, were much more pronounced and were manifested by a significant reduction in the spontaneous beating rate in the coculture experiments and by marked prolongation of the local ventricular RP in the rat, pig, and modeling studies. The crucial role of the transfected potassium channels was demonstrated not only by the significantly greater effects achieved by the transfected cells (compared with nontransfected fibroblasts) but also by the reversibility of these electrophysiological changes after administration of the specific Kv1.3 channel blockers (CTx or MTx).

We have chosen to use the Kv1.313,26,27 channel in these proof-of-concept studies for several reasons: the robust expression of this channel in the transfected cells, the absence of this current in cardiomyocytes, the high affinity to specific inhibitors that allows selective blockade of this current, and the rapid opening and relatively slow kinetics from opened to closed states (the latter property resulting in the significant tail current) that allow modulating effects during various phases of the action potential.

The mechanism underlying the observed electrophysiological effects stems from electrotonic interactions formed between the grafted and host cells. In the nontransfected fibroblast scenario, the fibroblast transmembrane potential closely follows that of the coupled myocyte (because of its relatively low capacitance), thereby limiting the magnitude of the electrotonic interactions. In contrast, depolarization of the Kv1.3 fibroblast leads to opening of these channels. The resulting fibroblast hyperpolarization leads to a sustained voltage differences in the myocyte-fibroblast pair throughout the action potential, consequentially modulating the cardiomyocyte electrophysiological properties through electrotonic interactions. Further evidence to support this mechanism can be found in the coculture studies (Figure 3C and 3D), showing that the electrophysiological effects are not limited to the fibroblast-attached myocytes but extend (through electrotonic interactions) to a distance several cells away from the seeded Kv1.3 fibroblasts.

Although the modeling studies demonstrated shortening of the cardiomyocyte APD, both the in vivo and modeling studies showed significant prolongation of the local ERP after Kv1.3 fibroblast grafting. Such a mismatch between the shortened APD and prolonged RP is the result of the significant hyperpolarizing tail current of the Kv1.3 channel. This tail current clamps the myocyte membrane to negative potential during the late phases of the action potential and early diastolic period, thereby preventing the initiation of a new action potential. The same early diastolic hyperpolarization mechanism may also underlie the suppression of automaticity in the coculture experiments.

To further test the hypothesis that the hyperpolarizating tail current of the Kv1.3 channel is responsible for the prolonged refractoriness, we created another transgenic fibroblast line expressing the Kir2.1 channel. This inwardly rectifying potassium current (IK1) is physiologically active at the end of phase 3 and during phase 4 of the action potential and is the main current in ventricular cells during diastole. Inhibition of this current in guinea pig ventricular myocytes resulted in prolongation of APD, depolarization of the RMP, and development of spontaneous pacemaking activity.11,17 In contrast, overexpression of this channel significantly shortened APD, accelerated phase 3 repolarization, and hyperpolarized the RMP.17 In the present study, transplantation of the Kir2.1-expressing fibroblasts resulted in a similar prolongation of ERP, further strengthening our hypothesis that hyperpolarizing electrotonic interactions during the immediate postrepolarization stage may prolong local refractoriness.

Study Limitations
The present study has a number of limitations. First, we did not record action potential morphologies directly but used an indirect approach of measuring ERP. Second, the electrophysiological effects were assessed during a relatively short time period (7 days); a clinically relevant effect would require longer follow-up. Thus, ensuring the long-term survival of the grafted cells and the continuous expression of the transgene is crucial to achieve long-term sustained effect. Third, our study used a fibroblast line and an immunosuppressive regimen. To overcome these drawbacks, autologous fibroblasts should be used. Fourth, although programmed electric stimulation failed to induce ventricular arrhythmias in the Kv1.3 fibroblast–transplanted hearts, the true arrhythmogenic potential of this strategy needs to be assessed in further studies.

Finally, as shown in the modeling studies, the Kv1.3 fibroblasts may induce both prolongation of the RP and shortening of the APD. One concern is that the shortened APD may alter calcium handling and reduce contractility, as demonstrated previously when the Kir2.1 transgene was expressed directly in cardiomyocytes.9 A potential solution for this problem may be to design potassium channels that will have minimal effects on phases 0 through 3 of the action potential but will retain the significant tail current properties, thereby continuing to affect the immediate postrepolarization phase.

Summary and Potential Clinical Application
The present study provides proof-of-concept evidence for the ability to perform a targeted modification of the local cardiac electrophysiological properties using a combined cell and gene therapy approach. In contrast to most other cell therapy procedures, which aim to replace dysfunctional tissue, the present approach seeks to modify the localized function of the tissue and thus may be more analogous to pharmacotherapy, but it may overcome some of the shortcomings of the latter approach by inducing a localized rather than a global cardiac effect.

In the present report, we have provided proof-of-concept evidence for the ability of fibroblasts transfected to express potassium channels to modulate 2 important electrophysiological properties that may be important in developing future antiarrhythmic strategies. These include the ability to prolong the local RP by a mechanism that does not involve action potential prolongation (potentially reducing the proarrhythmic risk associated with many antiarrhythmic agents) and the ability to reduce local automaticity. The potential of using cell grafts transfected to express different ionic channels may be expanded to other cardiac fields such as for the treatment of bradyarrhythmias (generation of a biological pacemaker28) and to other excitable tissues such as nervous system.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This study was supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation (No. 520/01), by the Technion R&D unit, and by the Stephen and Nancy Grand Foundation.

Disclosures

Drs Feld, Marom, and Gepstein are founders of GeneGrafts, a Technion University incubator company. Dr Bressler-Stramer is a former employee of GeneGrafts. The other authors report no conflicts.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Scheinman MM. NASPE survey on catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995; 18: 1474–1478.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kusumoto FM, Goldschlager N. Cardiac pacing. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 89–97.[Free Full Text]
  3. Passman R, Kadish A. Sudden death prevention with implantable devices. Circulation. 2007; 116: 560–571.
  4. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L, Greene HL, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 781–788.[Abstract]
  5. Donahue JK, Kikuchi K, Sasano T. Gene therapy for cardiac arrhythmias. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2005; 15: 219–224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Tomaselli GF, Donahue JK. Somatic gene transfer and cardiac arrhythmias: problems and prospects. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14: 547–550.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Nuss HB, Marban E, Johns DC. Overexpression of a human potassium channel suppresses cardiac hyperexcitability in rabbit ventricular myocytes. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 889–896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Mazhari R, Nuss HB, Armoundas AA, Winslow RL, Marban E. Ectopic expression of KCNE3 accelerates cardiac repolarization and abbreviates the QT interval. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109: 1083–1090.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ennis IL, Li RA, Murphy AM, Marban E, Nuss HB. Dual gene therapy with SERCA1 and Kir2.1 abbreviates excitation without suppressing contractility. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109: 393–400.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Donahue JK, Heldman AW, Fraser H, McDonald AD, Miller JM, Rade JJ, Eschenhagen T, Marban E. Focal modification of electrical conduction in the heart by viral gene transfer. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 1395–1398.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Miake J, Marban E, Nuss HB. Biological pacemaker created by gene transfer. Nature. 2002; 419: 132–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Qu J, Plotnikov AN, Danilo P Jr, Shlapakova I, Cohen IS, Robinson RB, Rosen MR. Expression and function of a biological pacemaker in canine heart. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1106–1109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Feld Y, Melamed-Frank M, Kehat I, Tal D, Marom S, Gepstein L. Electrophysiological modulation of cardiomyocytic tissue by transfected fibroblasts expressing potassium channels: a novel strategy to manipulate excitability. Circulation. 2002; 105: 522–529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Koval M, Geist ST, Westphale EM, Kemendy AE, Civitelli R, Beyer EC, Steinberg TH. Transfected connexin45 alters gap junction permeability in cells expressing endogenous connexin43. J Cell Biol. 1995; 130: 987–995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Koo GC, Blake JT, Talento A, Nguyen M, Lin S, Sirotina A, Shah K, Mulvany K, Hora D Jr, Cunningham P, Wunderler DL, McManus OB, Slaughter R, Bugianesi R, Felix J, Garcia M, Williamson J, Kaczorowski G, Sigal NH, Springer MS, Feeney W. Blockade of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.3 inhibits immune responses in vivo. J Immunol. 1997; 158: 5120–5128.[Abstract]
  16. Luo CH, Rudy Y. A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential: depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 1501–1526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Miake J, Marban E, Nuss HB. Functional role of inward rectifier current in heart probed by Kir2.1 overexpression and dominant-negative suppression. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1529–1536.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Rook MB, Jongsma HJ, de Jonge B. Single channel currents of homo- and heterologous gap junctions between cardiac fibroblasts and myocytes. Pflugers Arch. 1989; 414: 95–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Fast VG, Darrow BJ, Saffitz JE, Kleber AG. Anisotropic activation spread in heart cell monolayers assessed by high-resolution optical mapping: role of tissue discontinuities. Circ Res. 1996; 79: 115–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gaudesius G, Miragoli M, Thomas SP, Rohr S. Coupling of cardiac electrical activity over extended distances by fibroblasts of cardiac origin. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 421–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kizana E, Ginn SL, Smyth CM, Boyd A, Thomas SP, Allen DG, Ross DL, Alexander IE. Fibroblasts modulate cardiomyocyte excitability: implications for cardiac gene therapy. Gene Ther. 2006; 13: 1611–1615.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Camelliti P, Green CR, LeGrice I, Kohl P. Fibroblast network in rabbit sinoatrial node: structural and functional identification of homogeneous and heterogeneous cell coupling. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 828–835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kleber AG, Rudy Y. Basic mechanisms of cardiac impulse propagation and associated arrhythmias. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 431–488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Miragoli M, Gaudesius G, Rohr S. Electrotonic modulation of cardiac impulse conduction by myofibroblasts. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 801–810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bunch TJ, Mahapatra S, Bruce GK, Johnson SB, Miller DV, Horne BD, Wang XL, Lee HC, Caplice NM, Packer DL. Impact of transforming growth factor-beta1 on atrioventricular node conduction modification by injected autologous fibroblasts in the canine heart. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2485–2494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Marom S, Levitan IB. State-dependent inactivation of the Kv3 potassium channel. Biophys J. 1994; 67: 579–589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Marom S. Slow changes in the availability of voltage-gated ion channels: effects on the dynamics of excitable membranes. J Membr Biol. 1998; 161: 105–113.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Rosen MR, Brink PR, Cohen IS, Robinson RB. Biological pacemakers based on I(f). Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007; 45: 157–166.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Cardiac arrhythmias account for significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. Preventive antiarrhythmic therapies are aimed at modifying the abnormal electrophysiological substrate by either focal injury (surgery or radiofrequency catheter ablation) or pharmacological therapy. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy has been hampered by often low efficacy, global cardiac and systemic actions that often lead to poorly tolerated systemic side effects, and most important, life-threatening proarrhythmic effects. In this study, we present a novel combined cell and gene therapy approach for the modification of the myocardial electrophysiological substrate. Using fibroblast cell grafts genetically engineered to express specific potassium ionic channels, we aimed to perform a targeted modification of local cardiac electrophysiological properties. Detailed in vitro, in vivo, and computer modeling studies demonstrated the feasibility of this approach by showing that the engineered cells could couple with host cardiac cells and that this modified their electrophysiological properties. The cell grafts modulated important properties that are of interest for future antiarrhythmic strategies. These include prolongation of the local refractory period by a mechanism that does not involve action potential prolongation (potentially reducing the proarrhythmic risk associated with many antiarrhythmic agents that prolong the QT interval) and reduction in local automaticity (decreasing the spontaneous firing rate).


*    Footnotes
 
*The first 2 authors contributed equally to this work. Back

{dagger}The last 2 authors contributed equally to this work. Back

The online Data Supplement, which contains an expanded Methods section and figures, can be found with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/ cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671776/DC1.


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 711-713. [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Cabo
Modulation of impulse propagation by fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H1992 - H1993.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/6/720    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671776v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yankelson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gepstein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yankelson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gepstein, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arrhythmia
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrowRelated Article