Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:1153-1160
Published online before print February 11, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756510
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/9/1153    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756510v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahrendorf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissleder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahrendorf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissleder, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATORVASTATIN
*HEPTANOIC ACID
*PYRROLE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cardiomyopathy
*Heart Attack
*MRI Scans
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:1153-1160.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Imaging

Activatable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agent Reports Myeloperoxidase Activity in Healing Infarcts and Noninvasively Detects the Antiinflammatory Effects of Atorvastatin on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Matthias Nahrendorf, MD*; David Sosnovik, MD, PhD*; John W. Chen, MD, PhD; Peter Panizzi, PhD; Jose-Luiz Figueiredo, MD; Elena Aikawa, MD, PhD; Peter Libby, MD; Filip K. Swirski, PhD; Ralph Weissleder, MD, PhD

From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.N., J.C., J.F., R.W.); Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (M.N., D.S., J.C., P.P., J.F., E.A., F.K.S., R.W.); Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center on Atherosclerosis (M.N., E.A., P.L., R.W.) and Department of Systems Biology (R.W.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (D.S.); and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.L.).

Correspondence to Matthias Nahrendorf, MD, MGH-CSB, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail MNahrendorf{at}mgh.harvard.edu

Received October 10, 2007; accepted December 20, 2007.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Ischemic injury of the myocardium causes timed recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, which produce substantial amounts of local myeloperoxidase (MPO). MPO forms reactive chlorinating species capable of inflicting oxidative stress and altering protein function by covalent modification. We have used a small-molecule, gadolinium-based activatable sensor for magnetic resonance imaging of MPO activity (MPO-Gd). MPO-Gd is first radicalized by MPO and then either spontaneously oligomerizes or binds to matrix proteins, all leading to enhanced spin-lattice relaxivity and delayed washout kinetics. We hypothesized that MPO imaging could be used to measure inflammatory responses after myocardial ischemia locally and noninvasively in a murine model.

Methods and Results— We injected 0.3 mmol/kg MPO-Gd (or Gd-DTPA as control) and performed magnetic resonance imaging up to 120 minutes later in mice 2 days after myocardial infarction. The contrast-to-noise ratio (infarct versus septum) after Gd-DTPA injection peaked at 10 minutes and returned to preinjection values at 60 minutes. After injection of MPO-Gd, the contrast-to-noise ratio peaked later and was higher than Gd-DTPA (40.8±10.4 versus 10.5±0.2; P<0.05). MPO imaging was validated by magnetic resonance imaging of MPO–/– mice and correlated well with immunoreactive staining (r2=0.92, P<0.05), tissue activity by guaiacol assay (r2=0.65, P<0.001), and immunoblotting. In time course imaging, activity peaked 2 days after coronary ligation. Flow cytometry of digested infarcts detected MPO in neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages. Furthermore, serial MPO imaging accurately tracked the antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin therapy after ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Conclusions— MPO-Gd enables in vivo assessment of MPO activity in injured myocardium. This approach allows noninvasive evaluation of the inflammatory response to ischemia and has the potential to guide the development of novel cardioprotective therapies.


Key Words: inflammation • magnetic resonance imaging • myocardial infarction • myeloperoxidase • reperfusion


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ischemic injury to the myocardium elicits a strong inflammatory response.1–3 During the acute inflammatory phase, cytokine release, adhesion molecule expression, and cell preponderance in the blood pool govern the sequential recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes,4 which likely introduce myeloperoxidase (MPO) into the injured myocardial tissue. The extent and profile of the ensuing leukocyte influx regulate consecutive healing stages,4 whereas poor healing may lead to infarct rupture and heart failure.5 MPO catalyzes chloride oxidation to hypochlorous acid and generates other highly reactive moieties such as chlorine, tyrosyl radicals, and aldehydes, all of which contribute to the microbicidal and viricidal properties of phagocytes.6 These oxidizing species are cytotoxic,7 inhibit enzymes such as ATPase,8 and cross-link proteins.9 Therefore, although MPO is involved prominently in the first-line defense against infections mounted by the innate immune system, it may prove detrimental to the remodeling process after myocardial infarction (MI).7 Clinically, high MPO plasma levels predicted an increase in 5-year mortality in patients with acute MI.10

Clinical Perspective p 1160

Gadolinium (Gd) chelates (eg, Gd-DTPA), currently the only clinically approved imaging agent in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), distribute passively to the extracellular space and do not reflect the degree of active inflammation because acute infarction and chronic infarction enhance alike.11 We have recently developed an activatable and specific MPO sensor (5-hydroxytryptamide [MPO-Gd])12 and use it in the present study to image MPO activity in the heart. We hypothesize that during the inflammatory phase of myocardial ischemic injury, MPO activates the small-molecule substrate, which then polymerizes and exhibits increased T1 relaxivity, protein binding, and "trapping" in areas of high MPO activity, all leading to increased enhancement on T1-weighted MRI. We correlate noninvasive imaging data with ex vivo MPO tissue activity and study MPO activity in wild-type and MPO–/– mice with MI and ischemia-reperfusion injury. We further aimed to use this agent to characterize the time course of postinfarction MPO activity and to demonstrate that the agent possessed adequate dynamic range to image the antiinflammatory actions of statin therapy in vivo.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Mouse MI
This study used 56 C57BL6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Me; validation experiments, n=19; time course imaging, n=15; flow cytometry, n=10; ischemia-reperfusion experiments; n=12). In addition, we used 4 heterozygous and 3 homozygous MPO-deficient mice for validation purposes (The Jackson Laboratory). MI was induced by left coronary artery ligation as described previously.3 For sham surgery, a thoracotomy was performed and a suture was passed underneath the coronary artery that was not ligated. In animals subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury, the coronary artery was ligated for 30 minutes, followed by removal of the ligature. In reperfusion-injury experiments, mice were treated per gavage with control treatment (n=6) or with 100 mg/kg atorvastatin (n=6) 24 hours and 1 hour before surgery. Mice were anesthetized for all surgical and imaging procedures by inhalation anesthesia (isoflurane 1.5% to 3% vol/vol plus 2 L O2). The institutional Subcommittee on Research Animal Care at Massachusetts General Hospital approved all animal studies.

Synthesis of MPO-Gd
The MPO-sensitive imaging agent bis-5-hydroxytryptamide-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetate [bis-5HT-DTPA(Gd), MPO-Gd; molecular weight, 866 g/mol] was synthesized as described previously.12 Briefly, DTPA-bisanhydride was reacted with serotonin in dimethylformamide in the presence of an excess of triethylamine.12 The product bis-5HT-DTPA was isolated by recrystallization from methanol and acetone.

MRI Studies
We performed in vivo MRI after intravenous injection of MPO-Gd or gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA; Berlex Laboratories, Montville, NJ) at a dosage of 0.3 mmol/kg body weight. A 7-T horizontal-bore scanner (Pharmascan, Bruker, Billerica, Mass) and a dedicated mouse heart birdcage coil (Rapid Biomedical, Wuerzburg, Germany) were used to obtain delayed hyperenhancement images of the left ventricle in its short axis. We used ECG and respiratory gating with a T1-weighted gradient-echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence13 with the following parameters: echo time, 2.7 ms; frames per heart cycle, 16 (repetition time, 7.0 to 12.0 ms, depending on heart rate); flip angle, 60°; in-plane resolution, 200x200 µm; slice thickness, 1 mm; and number of excitations, 8. The images were then analyzed with an OsiriX DICOM reader (freeware, Geneva, Switzerland; www.osirix-viewer.com). Signal intensity was measured in the infarcted, akinetic lateral left ventricular (LV) wall, the noninfarcted interventricular septum, and a region outside the animal to calculate the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR): CNR=(target signal–septal signal)/(SD of the noise). The area enhanced after injection of MPO-Gd was quantified as a fraction of the entire LV myocardial area at the midventricular level for comparison with immunoreactive MPO presence in histological sections. In addition, we quantified the akinetic myocardial area as a percentage of total LV area in the midventricular imaging slice.

MPO Activity Assay
Apical infarcted portions of hearts from various time points after MI were homogenized (Omni International, Marietta, Ga) for 30 seconds on ice in potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Samples were sonicated, freeze-thawed 3 times, and centrifuged to remove debris, and 50-fold dilutions of heart samples were dissolved in potassium phosphate buffer containing 120 µmol/L guaiacol and 900 µmol/L H202. Change of absorption at 470 nm was measured with a Cary 50 spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, Calif). Purified MPO was used to obtain a standard curve. Units of MPO activity were defined as the molar change–oxidized guaiacol absorbance (E470 nm=26.6 mmol/L–1 · cm–1) with time.14 Guaiacol oxidation progress curves were analyzed by least-squares fitting of a line equation to the data using Scientist software (MicroMath, St Louis, Mo). Bicinchoninic acid protein assays (Pierce, Rockford, Ill) were performed to determine the total protein concentration of heart samples and to normalize data.

Flow Cytometry
After the mice were killed, hearts were excised and the tissue was prepared as described previously.3 To visualize monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils, the suspension was incubated with a mixture of monoclonal antibodies. The following antibodies were used: anti–CD90-PE, 53-2.1; anti–B220-PE, RA3-6B2; anti–CD49b-PE, DX5; anti–NK1.1-PE, PK136; anti–Ly-6G-PE, 1A8; anti–CD11b-APC-Cy7, M1/70 (all BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif); and anti-MPO, 8F4 (Hycult Biotechnology, Canton, Mass). Monocytes/macrophages were identified as CD11bhi (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ly-6G)lo. Neutrophils were identified as CD11bhi (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ly-6G)hi. For intracellular staining of MPO, cells were permeabilized and fixed with a Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry was performed on an LSRII (BD Biosciences).

MPO Genotyping
MPO-deficient mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Genomic DNA was isolated from overnight proteinase K (50 µg) digestion of tail clips at 55°C. Primers flanking the insertion site of the neomycin cassette were used to generate a 155-bp product band corresponding to the wild-type allele in identical Taq polymerase reactions containing the same concentration of genomic DNA (conditions and primer sequences were provided by The Jackson Laboratory). To verify the MPO–/– genotype, Western blotting for MPO protein was performed as described below for heart homogenates 2 days after MI.

Western Blot Analysis
Samples of heart homogenates were subjected to SDS gel (4% to 15%, BioRad, Hercules, Calif) electrophoresis. Blots were incubated with rabbit primary antibodies for MPO (Millipore, Billerica, Mass), intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, ICAM-2, and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 (Santa Cruz Technologies, Santa Cruz, Calif); washed with PBS/0.5% Tween 20; and visualized with Western Lightning (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Mass) oxidation by horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa). To verify that similar amounts of protein were loaded, blots were stripped with Restore solution (Pierce), and the procedure was repeated with anti–glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, Rockland, Gilbertsville, Pa). Densitometry was performed using ImageJ with a custom set of macros that quantified signal intensity in a standardized fashion.

Histopathology
Hearts were excised and rinsed in PBS and embedded in OCT (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, Calif). Serial 6-µm-thick sections were collected in the midventricular level and used for immunohistochemical staining for neutrophils (NIMP-R14, Abcam, Cambridge, Mass), monocytes/macrophages (Mac-3, M3/84, BD PharMingen, San Diego, Calif), and MPO (NeoMarkers, Freemont, Calif). The reaction was visualized as a 3-step staining procedure using biotinylated secondary antibodies (BA4001, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif) and the AEC Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories). The MPO-stained area was quantified as a fraction of the entire short-axis ring at x2 magnification using OsiriX software and then correlated to the MPO-Gd–enhanced region in an MRI of the same animal.

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SD. The data sets were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the Dallal-Wilkinson-Lilliefors correction and for equality of variances using the F test. Data were compared using the unpaired 2-sided t test. If either normality or equality of variances was rejected, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used. For multiple comparisons, we used ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni posttest. The significance level in all tests was 0.05. We used GraphPad Prism 4.0c for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, Calif) for statistical analysis.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
MPO-Gd Accumulates in Acutely Infarcted Myocardium and Exhibits Delayed Washout Kinetics Compared With Gd-DTPA
To study the enhancement pattern and kinetics after injection of MPO-Gd, we imaged 4 mice per group 2 days after coronary ligation before and up to 2 hours after injection of equal doses of MPO-Gd and Gd-DTPA. Delayed enhancement was observed in the akinetic infarct at 10 and 30 minutes after injection of the conventional gadolinium chelate, with complete return of CNR to baseline at 60 minutes (Figure 1). Peak CNR after injection of Gd-DTPA was observed at 10 minutes (10.5±0.2). After injection of MPO-Gd, the peak CNR was significantly higher (CNR at 60 minutes, 40.8±10.4), and enhancement was observed even at 120 minutes after injection (Figure 1). Comparison of both curves using a 2-tailed Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed significantly brighter enhancement for MPO-Gd (P=0.026).


Figure 1188906
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. In vivo imaging of MPO activity 2 days after MI. A, Strong and persistent hyperenhancement is seen in the infarct zone in mice injected with MPO-Gd. Two hours after injection, the infarcted LV free wall is brightly enhanced at a time when conventional Gd-DTPA has been washed out completely (B). C, The CNR shows higher values and delayed washout after injection of MPO-Gd vs conventional Gd-DTPA.

MPO-Gd Specifically Targets MPO Activity
Experiments using transgenic mice evaluated the specificity of MPO-Gd for MPO activity. We compared the CNR 1 hour after injection in 4 wild-type mice, 4 heterozygous mice, and 3 homozygous mice deficient for MPO 2 days after coronary ligation. MPO–/– mice exhibited significantly diminished enhancement (ANOVA, P=0.02 for MPO–/– versus MPO+/+), and an intermediate CNR was observed in MPO+/– mice (Figure 2A through 2D). The akinetic LV wall area was not different between homozygous and heterozygous mice deficient for MPO and wild-type mice (MPO+/+, 50±4%; MPO+/–, 49±4%; MPO–/–, 49±6%; P=0.9). Therefore, it is unlikely that differences in enhancement observed between genotypes are caused by varying infarct size. Genotypes of mice were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, and the absence of MPO protein in homozygous mice deficient for the MPO gene was observed by immunoblotting (Figure 2E). These experiments established that enhancement after MPO-Gd injection correlates closely with MPO activity.


Figure 2188906
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Imaging of MPO-deficient mice establishes specificity of MPO-Gd for MPO. A, The infarct of a wild-type mouse 2 hours after injection of MPO-Gd is brightly enhanced. Imaging was performed on day 2 after MI in all mice. B, Intermediate-level enhancement is observed in heterozygous MPO-deficient mice, corresponding to 50% enzyme activity levels. C, In homozygous MPO-deficient mice, enhancement after injection of MPO-Gd is significantly reduced, establishing the specificity of MPO-Gd. D, CNRs in respective genotypes show significantly diminished enhancement in MPO-deficient mice. E, Polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting of representative genotypes shown in A through C. *P<0.05.

Cellular MPO Studies
We next investigated the individual cellular contributions to MPO activity in the healing infarct by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry of single-cell suspension obtained from digested infarcts revealed that neutrophils, the most numerous cell type in a 2-day-old mouse myocardial infarct,4 contributed predominantly to local MPO activity, followed by monocytes/macrophages. All other cell types such as lymphocytes contributed negligibly to the MPO signal (Figure 3).


Figure 3188906
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Cellular contribution to MPO activity in 2-day–old infarcts. Intracellular MPO levels 2 days after MI. Single-cell suspensions of infarcts were prepared and stained with antibodies to detect lymphocytes [gate I, (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ly-6G)hi CD11blo], monocytes/macrophages [gate ii, (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ly-6G)lo CD11bhi], and neutrophils [gate iii, (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ly-6G)hi CD11bhi]. Intracellular staining was conducted to detect MPO levels and is represented as mean fluorescent intensities (MFI). Mean and SEM are shown; n=3. On day 2 after MI, neutrophils are the main contributors to MPO activity in the infarct, followed by monocyte/macrophages. *P<0.001.

MRI Enhancement of MPO-Gd Corresponds to Immunoreactive MPO Protein
To further investigate the specificity of MPO-Gd, we performed immunoreactive staining of hearts after MRI. The enhanced fraction of the LV myocardium visualized by MRI was not significantly different from and correlated well with the MPO-positive fraction quantified by immunostaining for the enzyme (MRI, 45±10%; histology, 44±12%; P=0.9; r2=0.92, P<0.05). Adjacent sections were stained for the presence of neutrophils and macrophages, and both cell types colocalized with MPO (Figure 4).


Figure 4188906
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Immunoreactive staining reveals distribution of MPO in the infarct and colocalization with neutrophils and macrophages. A, Low-resolution hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain of a 2-day–old infarct. Inset, Location of high-magnification histology shown in B through D. Magnification x40; scale bar=500 µm. B, Immunoreactive staining for MPO shows the presence of the enzyme in 2-day–old infarction and colocalization with macrophages (MAC; C) and neutrophils (D). Magnification x200; scale bar=100 µm.

Time Course of MPO Activity During Infarct Healing
We next followed the time course of MPO activity in healing myocardial infarcts. Three to 4 mice per day were imaged on days 1 to 8 after coronary ligation and killed after MRI to correlate ex vivo tissue activities to in vivo MRI data. The peak enhancement occurred on day 2 after coronary ligation. This observation was corroborated by tissue activity measurements and immunoblotting, which also showed that MPO activity peaked on day 2 after infarction (Figure 5A through 5C). Very little enhancement remained by day 8, consistent with decreasing cellularity and inflammatory activity in the infarcted myocardium at this later time point. Comparison of MRI-derived CNR with ex vivo tissue activity and immunoblotting corroborated the time course (Figure 5D and 5E) and yielded a significant correlation (r2=0.65, P<0.001; Figure 5F). The peak MRI-derived CNR on day 2 was 6.1 times higher than on day 8, comparable to the 10-fold difference detected in vitro. The moderate value of the correlation coefficient most likely results from CNR being measured in the midventricular slice, whereas the whole apical portion of the LV was used for the guaiacol assay, possibly also reflecting differences in individual infarct sizes.


Figure 5188906
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Time course of MPO activity after MI. A and B, Short-axis MRI of representative mice on days 2 (A) and 8 (B) after coronary ligation. Insets, Geometry of the short-axis view (dotted lines). On day 2, bright enhancement is observed in the infarcted akinetic LV free wall (arrows). The enhancement is significantly diminished 8 days after MI, consistent with dampened inflammation. C, Time course of CNR after coronary ligation. Three to 4 mice were imaged per time point. Peak enhancement is observed on day 2. D, MPO tissue activity assessed by guaiacol assay in the same animals shows a time course similar to MPO imaging, with peak activity occurring on day 2. E, Western blots show no MPO in the hearts of sham-operated mice, strong staining on days 1 to 4 after MI, and low signal on day 8 after coronary ligation, corroborating the in vivo MRI and tissue activity assay data. F, Correlation of CNR obtained by MRI with tissue activity levels measured by guaiacol assay.

In Vivo Imaging of the Action of an Antiinflammatory Intervention
Detection of moderately expressed targets, serial imaging, and monitoring of therapy effects are benchmarks for any new molecular imaging technology. We therefore used MPO-Gd to follow the development of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Four hours after the onset of reperfusion, control mice exhibited a patchy enhancement pattern in the hypokinetic LV free wall, and the signal consolidated further at 24 hours (Figure 6), at which time the peak CNR was comparable to permanent ligation (24.3±4.5 versus 26.0±6.4; P=0.65). In mice treated with atorvastatin, similarly increased CNR values were observed at 4 hours; however, the signal was significantly attenuated at the 24-hour time point (Figure 6). Importantly, the preinjection scan at the second time point did not show enhancement in either group. Therefore, complete washout of MPO-Gd was achieved within 24 hours. Flow cytometry of cells harvested from infarcts revealed that the absolute number of neutrophils and monocyte/macrophages per 1 mg infarct tissue diminished in mice treated with atorvastatin, providing an explanation for lower MPO activity in this group (Figure 7). Immunoblotting of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and ICAM-2 showed decreased levels in atorvastatin-treated mice, thus likely leading to the decreased cell recruitment and lower MPO activity observed by in vivo MRI (Figure 6) and in Western blotting (Figure 7).


Figure 6188906
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Monitoring of therapy by serial imaging of MPO activity in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). A and B, MRI in mice subjected to 30 minutes of myocardial ischemia, followed by 4 hours of reperfusion. After injection of MPO-Gd, the lateral wall enhances in both treated and untreated groups. C and D, Mice were reinjected with MPO-Gd 24 hours later and imaged again. Treatment with atorvastatin results in significantly diminished enhancement (E).


Figure 7188906
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Atorvastatin decreases adhesion molecule expression and cell recruitment. A, Western blots for VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and ICAM-2 show decreased levels of these adhesion molecules after ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in mice treated with atorvastatin. Consequently, MPO expression is reduced in atorvastatin-treated mice. B, Flow cytometry of cell suspensions dislodged from the injured lateral wall shows significantly diminished recruitment of neutrophils and monocyte/macrophages in mice treated with atorvastatin. *P<0.05.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although a wealth of preclinical data have implicated oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of reperfusion injury, clinical trials of free radical scavengers have yielded conflicting results.15 We show here that an MPO-activatable gadolinium chelate can be used to directly image MPO activity in the heart noninvasively by MRI. This agent might improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of oxidative injury in acute myocardial ischemia and may help to implement successful clinical strategies. The described imaging technology has high inherent sensitivity because it not only reported massive oxidative stress related to inflammatory cell recruitment on day 2 after MI but also detected subtle increases in MPO activity as early as 4 hours after the onset of reperfusion injury, even with agent concentrations in the clinically plausible range. Studies in MPO–/– mice and correlation of MPO imaging with biochemical and morphological assays provide strong evidence supporting the specificity of the imaging signal as a reporter for MPO activity.

MPO-Gd is a small molecule, with a size comparable to that of clinically used gadolinium chelates. This property facilitates delivery of the molecule to the target area in the injured myocardium. MPO activates the probe through the oxidation of the hydroxytryptamide moieties on the chelate.16 The ligands then react with each other, leading to polymerization of the agent into dimers, tetramers, and occasionally even pentamers. This polymerization decreases the tumbling rate of gadolinium, activates the probe, and enhances the T1-shortening effect of the imaging agent.16 Furthermore, the increased size of the polymer and cross-linking to surrounding matrix proteins promote the retention of the probe in areas of high MPO activity, which results in substantially decelerated washout kinetics.16 Therefore, we found very bright enhancement at 1 hour after injection, at a time when conventional Gd-DTPA and nonactivated MPO-Gd have been washed out of the myocardium completely. Nevertheless, as demonstrated in serial imaging of reperfusion injury, the washout also is rapid enough to facilitate frequent serial imaging. Of note, this study shows that MPO-Gd–derived signal exhibits an adequate dynamic range to detect changes in MPO activity. MPO expression was modulated in several ways. Wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous MPO-deficient mice were imaged, and a strong linear relationship was seen between the MR signal intensity and the genotype of the mouse imaged. In addition, imaging with MPO-Gd visualized antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin17–19 after myocardial reperfusion injury in mice in vivo. In our study, we used MPO-Gd in a murine model and at high field strength. Because the longitudinal relaxivity of gadolinium chelates increases at lower field strength,20–22 lower doses of MPO-Gd will likely be detectable at 1.5 T. It is quite possible that the dose of 0.3 mmol/kg used in our study at 7 T could be reduced to the clinically approved dose of 0.1 mmol/kg at 1.5 T. This prediction, however, will need to be confirmed by imaging larger animals at clinical field strengths.

Recent studies have used magnetofluorescent nanoparticles to image inflammation after ischemic injury of the myocardium.3,23 The biological target of this strategy is different, however. Although nanoparticles are ingested by phagocytes and therefore report their presence, MPO-Gd is a functional reporter that probes activity of a pro-oxidant enzyme. Combined strategies using both magnetic nanoparticles and the MPO-Gd chelate could provide novel and complementary information, a conjecture that requires further study.

Peak MPO activity occurred in the infarct on day 2, during the initial proinflammatory phase after infarction. This time point coincides with the dominant presence of neutrophils and Ly6Chi monocytes, the inflammatory monocyte subtype that accumulates in the first phase of leukocyte recruitment after MI.4 Both of these cell types are first-line responders that express high levels of MPO. Systemic neutrophilia24,25 and monocytosis26,27 after acute MI are associated with graver prognosis in patients. In addition, MPO deficiency alleviated the evolution of heart failure in mice after coronary ligation.7 The ability to image MPO activity in vivo could provide novel insights into the functional status of inflammatory cells and thus facilitate the development of novel therapies to optimize infarct healing.

Using serial noninvasive MPO imaging, we followed leukocyte recruitment and monitored a significant attenuation of MPO activity by atorvastatin therapy. This may reflect the ability of statins to reduce infarct size.28,29 In patients with coronary artery disease, atorvastatin reduced MPO-derived oxidants independently of changes in lipid parameters,30 and statins attenuated myocardial ischemic injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes.31 We used immunoblotting and flow cytometry to investigate the underlying mechanism of the treatment effect observed by MPO imaging in the present study. Atorvastatin decreased the expression of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and ICAM-2, the endothelial binding sites for the integrins VLA-4 on monocytes and LFA-1 on neutrophils.32 As a part of the leukocyte adhesion cascade, these adhesion proteins regulate inflammatory cell recruitment.32 Therefore, atorvastatin treatment likely reduced leukocyte recruitment via reduced expression of adhesion molecules, analogous to the situation in atherosclerosis.33,34 In addition, statin therapy also may decrease MPO expression in macrophages.35 Our findings are consistent with reports of reduced infarct size in mice after HMG-CoA reductase inhibition28,29 and indicate how MPO imaging might facilitate the discovery process for novel therapy targeting ischemia-reperfusion injury.

The present study shows that a novel activatable MRI probe can image MPO activity in the myocardium in vivo. We further demonstrate that MPO-Gd accurately reported MPO activity in vivo and possessed adequate sensitivity and dynamic range to detect treatment effects. Inflammation after ischemia may vary in the clinical setting, impressively shown in clinical trials demonstrating severe adverse effects of steroids on infarct healing.36 MPO-Gd gauges activity of MPO in vivo, which can serve as a surrogate for the intensity of leukocyte influx. Preclinical data support that inflammation affects the extent of post-MI remodeling1,2,4 and therefore prognosis. Molecular MRI of MPO activity in animals, and ultimately in humans, could facilitate noninvasive imaging of the natural history of inflammation and its impact on myocardial healing/remodeling. This would allow the role of inflammation in animal models and humans to be compared directly and the efficacy of various immune modulators to be better understood. MPO imaging could ultimately be used as part of a "personalized" regimen in those patients at highest risk of remodeling (large anterior infarction) to guide novel therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, leukocyte recruitment is a general component of inflammation. This molecular imaging sensor thus could play an important translational role in not only ischemic heart disease but also other inflammatory cardiovascular conditions such as atherosclerosis, myocarditis, and transplant rejection.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We would like to thank Lee Josephson, PhD, Fred Reynolds, PhD, Elisenda Rodriguez, PhD, and Micheal Breckwoldt for chemical synthesis; the CMIR Mouse Imaging Program (Carlos Rangel, BS, and Anne Yu, BS) for assistance with MR imaging; the CMIR Pathology Core for assistance with histology (Vincent Lok, BS, and Yoshiko Iwamoto, BS); and Jennifer Panizzi, PhD, and Martin Etzrodt, MS, for assistance with immunoblotting and densitometry.

Sources of Funding

This work was funded in part by the D.W. Reynolds Foundation, UO1-HL080731 (Dr Weissleder), RO1-HL078641 (Dr Weissleder), 5K08HL081170 (Dr Chen), and R24-CA92782 (Dr Weissleder).

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Blankesteijn WM, Creemers E, Lutgens E, Cleutjens JP, Daemen MJ, Smits JF. Dynamics of cardiac wound healing following myocardial infarction: observations in genetically altered mice. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001; 173: 75–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Frangogiannis NG, Smith CW, Entman ML. The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 53: 31–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik DE, Waterman P, Swirski FK, Pande AN, Aikawa E, Figueiredo JL, Pittet MJ, Weissleder R. Dual channel optical tomographic imaging of leukocyte recruitment and protease activity in the healing myocardial infarct. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 1218–1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo JL, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med. 2007; 204: 3037–3047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2981–2988.[Free Full Text]

6. Rosen H, Crowley JR, Heinecke JW. Human neutrophils use the myeloperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide-chloride system to chlorinate but not nitrate bacterial proteins during phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 30463–30468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Vasilyev N, Williams T, Brennan ML, Unzek S, Zhou X, Heinecke JW, Spitz DR, Topol EJ, Hazen SL, Penn MS. Myeloperoxidase-generated oxidants modulate left ventricular remodeling but not infarct size after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2812–2820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Eley DW, Eley JM, Korecky B, Fliss H. Impairment of cardiac contractility and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase activity by hypochlorous acid: reversal by dithiothreitol. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991; 69: 1677–1685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Heinecke JW. Mechanisms of oxidative damage by myeloperoxidase in atherosclerosis and other inflammatory disorders. J Lab Clin Med. 1999; 133: 321–325.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Mocatta TJ, Pilbrow AP, Cameron VA, Senthilmohan R, Frampton CM, Richards AM, Winterbourn CC. Plasma concentrations of myeloperoxidase predict mortality after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1993–2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Fuster V, Kim RJ. Frontiers in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2005; 112: 135–144.[Free Full Text]

12. Querol M, Chen JW, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A Jr. DTPA-bisamide-based MR sensor agents for peroxidase imaging. Org Lett. 2005; 7: 1719–1722.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Yang Z, Berr SS, Gilson WD, Toufektsian MC, French BA. Simultaneous evaluation of infarct size and cardiac function in intact mice by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals contractile dysfunction in noninfarcted regions early after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1161–1167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Klebanoff SJ, Waltersdorph AM, Rosen H. Antimicrobial activity of myeloperoxidase. Methods Enzymol. 1984; 105: 399–403.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 1121–1135.[Free Full Text]

16. Chen JW, Querol Sans M, Bogdanov A Jr, Weissleder R. Imaging of myeloperoxidase in mice by using novel amplifiable paramagnetic substrates. Radiology. 2006; 240: 473–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Mital S, Liao JK. Statins and the myocardium. Semin Vasc Med. 2004; 4: 377–384.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Schonbeck U, Libby P. Inflammation, immunity, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: statins as antiinflammatory agents? Circulation. 2004; 109 (suppl): II-18–II-26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Wolfrum S, Grimm M, Heidbreder M, Dendorfer A, Katus HA, Liao JK, Richardt G. Acute reduction of myocardial infarct size by a hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor is mediated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003; 41: 474–480.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Ghaghada KB, Bockhorst KH, Mukundan S Jr, Annapragada AV, Narayana PA. High-resolution vascular imaging of the rat spine using liposomal blood pool MR agent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28: 48–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann KP, Claussen CD, Schick F. Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Gadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41: 213–221.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Morawski AM, Winter PM, Crowder KC, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW, Scott MJ, Robertson JD, Abendschein DR, Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Targeted nanoparticles for quantitative imaging of sparse molecular epitopes with MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 51: 480–486.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Sosnovik DE, Nahrendorf M, Deliolanis N, Novikov M, Aikawa E, Josephson L, Rosenzweig A, Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V. Fluorescence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial macrophage infiltration in infarcted myocardium in vivo. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1384–1391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Kirtane AJ, Bui A, Murphy SA, Barron HV, Gibson CM. Association of peripheral neutrophilia with adverse angiographic outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93: 532–536.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Kyne L, Hausdorff JM, Knight E, Dukas L, Azhar G, Wei JY. Neutrophilia and congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2000; 139: 94–100.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Maekawa Y, Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Asakura Y, Takahashi T, Ishikawa S, Mitamura H, Ogawa S. Prognostic significance of peripheral monocytosis after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: a possible role for left ventricular remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 241–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Mariani M, Fetiveau R, Rossetti E, Poli A, Poletti F, Vandoni P, D’Urbano M, Cafiero F, Mariani G, Klersy C, De Servi S. Significance of total and differential leucocyte count in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 2511–2515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Jones SP, Trocha SD, Lefer DJ. Pretreatment with simvastatin attenuates myocardial dysfunction after ischemia and chronic reperfusion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 2059–2064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Lefer DJ, Scalia R, Jones SP, Sharp BR, Hoffmeyer MR, Farvid AR, Gibson MF, Lefer AM. HMG-CoA reductase inhibition protects the diabetic myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 1454–1456.[Free Full Text]

30. Shishehbor MH, Brennan ML, Aviles RJ, Fu X, Penn MS, Sprecher DL, Hazen SL. Statins promote potent systemic antioxidant effects through specific inflammatory pathways. Circulation. 2003; 108: 426–431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Patti G, Pasceri V, Colonna G, Miglionico M, Fischetti D, Sardella G, Montinaro A, Di Sciascio G. Atorvastatin pretreatment improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-ACS randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1272–1278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Ley K, Laudanna C, Cybulsky MI, Nourshargh S. Getting to the site of inflammation: the leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007; 7: 678–689.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Sukhova GK, Williams JK, Libby P. Statins reduce inflammation in atheroma of nonhuman primates independent of effects on serum cholesterol. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1452–1458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Nahrendorf M, Jaffer FA, Kelly KA, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Weissleder R. Noninvasive vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 imaging identifies inflammatory activation of cells in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1504–1511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Kumar AP, Reynolds WF. Statins downregulate myeloperoxidase gene expression in macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 331: 442–451.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Roberts R, DeMello V, Sobel BE. Deleterious effects of methylprednisolone in patients with myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1976; 53 (suppl): I-204–I-206.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Myeloperoxidase is a signature enzyme of inflammatory cells (neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages) and can serve as a surrogate marker for the extent of tissue inflammation in myocardial infarction. Here, we present a novel approach to noninvasive imaging of myeloperoxidase activity locally in the myocardium. Using an "activatable" paramagnetic myeloperoxidase substrate with magnetic resonance imaging, the approach could be used to identify patients at risk for adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction and may guide novel therapeutic strategies to prevent heart failure. Because neutrophils and/or monocytes/macrophages play key roles in inflammation and tissue repair, the imaging agent also could be used to assess atherosclerosis, myocarditis, or transplant rejection.


*    Footnotes
 
*Drs Nahrendorf and Sosnovik contributed equally to this work. Back

Guest Editor for this article was Roberto Bolli, MD.


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1121-1123. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
M. Nahrendorf, E. Keliher, P. Panizzi, H. Zhang, S. Hembrador, J.-L. Figueiredo, E. Aikawa, K. Kelly, P. Libby, and R. Weissleder
18F-4V for PET-CT Imaging of VCAM-1 Expression in Atherosclerosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 1213 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
W.H. W. Tang
Enhancing the Prognostic Value of Cardiac Imaging With Multimodal Risk Assessment
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 1100 - 1102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. DeLeo III, M. J. Gounis, B. Hong, J. C. Ford, A. K. Wakhloo, and A. A. Bogdanov Jr
Carotid Artery Brain Aneurysm Model: In Vivo Molecular Enzyme-specific MR Imaging of Active Inflammation in a Pilot Study
Radiology, September 1, 2009; 252(3): 696 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. Saraste, S. G. Nekolla, and M. Schwaiger
Cardiovascular molecular imaging: an overview
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2009; 83(4): 643 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. A. Ronald, J. W. Chen, Y. Chen, A. M. Hamilton, E. Rodriguez, F. Reynolds, R. A. Hegele, K. A. Rogers, M. Querol, A. Bogdanov, et al.
Enzyme-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting Myeloperoxidase Identifies Active Inflammation in Experimental Rabbit Atherosclerotic Plaques
Circulation, August 18, 2009; 120(7): 592 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. J. Nicholls and S. L. Hazen
Myeloperoxidase, modified lipoproteins, and atherogenesis
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(Supplement): S346 - S351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
E. A. Osborn and F. A. Jaffer
The year in molecular imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2009; 2(1): 97 - 113.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
M. Nahrendorf, D. E. Sosnovik, B. A. French, F. K. Swirski, F. Bengel, M. M. Sadeghi, J. R. Lindner, J. C. Wu, D. L. Kraitchman, Z. A. Fayad, et al.
Multimodality Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging, Part II
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 56 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. O. Breckwoldt, J. W. Chen, L. Stangenberg, E. Aikawa, E. Rodriguez, S. Qiu, M. A. Moskowitz, and R. Weissleder
Tracking the inflammatory response in stroke in vivo by sensing the enzyme myeloperoxidase
PNAS, November 25, 2008; 105(47): 18584 - 18589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
A. J. Sinusas, F. Bengel, M. Nahrendorf, F. H. Epstein, J. C. Wu, F. S. Villanueva, Z. A. Fayad, and R. J. Gropler
Multimodality Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging, Part I
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2008; 1(3): 244 - 256.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/9/1153    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756510v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahrendorf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissleder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahrendorf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissleder, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATORVASTATIN
*HEPTANOIC ACID
*PYRROLE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cardiomyopathy
*Heart Attack
*MRI Scans
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrowRelated Article