Published online before print January 19, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788653
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2009;119:547-557.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Molecular Cardiology |
Endothelial Progenitor Cells Restore Renal Function in Chronic Experimental Renovascular Disease
From the Department of Internal Medicine (Divisions of Nephrology and Hypertension [A.R.C., X.Z., R.L., J.D.K., L.O.L.] and Cardiovascular Diseases [S.P., R.D.S., A.L., L.O.L.]), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, and Department of General Pathology and Excellence Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, School of Medicine, II University of Naples, Naples, Italy (C.N.). A.R.C. is currently at the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson. Dr Lavi is currently at the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Care Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Lilach O. Lerman, MD, PhD, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail Lerman.Lilach{at}Mayo.Edu
Received April 25, 2008; accepted November 24, 2008.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) promote neovascularization and endothelial repair. Renal artery stenosis (RAS) may impair renal function by inducing intrarenal microvascular injury and remodeling. We investigated whether replenishment with EPCs would protect the renal microcirculation in chronic experimental renovascular disease.
Methods and Results— Single-kidney hemodynamics and function were assessed with the use of multidetector computed tomography in vivo in pigs with RAS, pigs with RAS 4 weeks after intrarenal infusion of autologous EPCs, and controls. Renal microvascular remodeling and angiogenic pathways were investigated ex vivo with the use of micro–computed tomography, histology, and Western blotting. EPCs increased renal expression of angiogenic factors, stimulated proliferation and maturation of new vessels, and attenuated renal microvascular remodeling and fibrosis in RAS. Furthermore, EPCs normalized the blunted renal microvascular and filtration function.
Conclusions— The present study shows that a single intrarenal infusion of autologous EPCs preserved microvascular architecture and function and decreased microvascular remodeling in experimental chronic RAS. It is likely that restoration of the angiogenic cascade by autologous EPCs involved not only generation of new vessels but also acceleration of their maturation and stabilization. This contributed to preserving the blood supply, hemodynamics, and function of the RAS kidney, supporting EPCs as a promising therapeutic intervention for preserving the kidney in renovascular disease.
Key Words: blood flow • kidney • progenitor cells • renal artery stenosis • hypertension, renal
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) mobilized endogenously in response to ischemia play a crucial role in augmenting neovascularization of ischemic tissues and endothelial replacement after vascular injury. Replenishment of such cells may limit vascular injury through reconstitution of the luminal barrier and cellular secretion of paracrine factors, providing a novel therapeutic option.1,2 Indeed, growing experimental and clinical evidence underscores the critical role that circulating cells play in healing the endothelium when the intrinsic system is unable to adequately support tissue repair. Targeted delivery of EPCs has been shown to improve the function of the infarcted myocardium,3 decrease hindlimb ischemia,4,5 rescue the kidney from acute ischemia injury,6 and participate in glomerular endothelial repair in glomerulonephritis.7
Clinical Perspective p 557
Ischemic nephropathy secondary to renal artery stenosis (RAS) represents an important cause of renovascular disease and hypertension that may induce renal injury and lead to end-stage renal disease. The presence of renovascular disease also constitutes an independent predictor for increased morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease and cardiac events.8 We have shown previously that the kidney exposed to chronic RAS shows significant functional deterioration attended by renal inflammation, fibrosis, and microvascular rarefaction and remodeling.9–12 Indeed, intrarenal microvascular disease likely aggravates the progression of renal injury in RAS and may account for the failure of renal function to improve after restoration of blood flow. However, despite pressing clinical need, targeted interventions capable of protecting the kidney or reversing its injury in chronic renovascular disease are yet to be identified.
Recent evidence suggests potential for cell-based repair interventions in rodent models of renal injury.13,14 Nevertheless, the potential utility of progenitor cells for preserving the function and structure of the kidney in a model of chronic renovascular disease has not been investigated. Therefore, the present study was designed to test the hypothesis that replenishment of progenitor cells would improve renal function by protecting the vascular integrity of the stenotic porcine kidney.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all the procedures (A17807). Twenty-one domestic pigs (weight, 55 to 65 kg) were studied after 6 weeks and again after 10 to 12 weeks of observation. In 14 pigs (Pork Partners, Stewartville, Minn), a local-irritant coil was placed in the main renal artery at baseline and induced gradual development of unilateral RAS. We have shown previously that by 4 to 5 weeks after coil implantation, this model already exhibits a chronic decrease in renal function and that significant stenoses induce pathological renal alterations that closely resemble chronic renovascular disease in humans, including inflammation, fibrosis, and mild glomerulosclerosis.10,11,15,16 The pigs had renal angiography 6 weeks after induction of RAS and were then randomized into 2 groups that were not further treated (RAS group; n=7) or treated with an intrarenal infusion of autologous EPCs (RAS+EPC group; n=7). To generate EPCs, peripheral mononuclear cells were isolated from each pig 3 and 5 weeks after induction of RAS, expanded in vitro, and delivered to the same RAS+EPC pig during the 6-week renal angiography. Four weeks later, all animals underwent repeated renal angiography, as well as in vivo studies. Throughout these 10 weeks, blood pressure was monitored continuously with a telemetry system (PhysioTel, Data Sciences) implanted at baseline in the left femoral artery. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded with telemetry at 5-minute intervals and averaged for each 24-hour period10,11,17 and was also measured during in vivo studies with a side arm of the arterial catheter. The other 7 pigs were used as controls (normal group; n=7).
By 6 weeks after induction of RAS, all of the pigs underwent renal angiography, as mentioned above. For this, all the pigs were anesthetized with intramuscular Telazol (5 mg/kg) and xylazine (2 mg/kg), intubated, and mechanically ventilated with room air. Anesthesia was maintained with a mixture of ketamine (0.2 mg/kg per minute) and xylazine (0.03 mg/kg per minute) in normal saline, administered via an ear vein cannula (0.05 mL/kg per minute). Under sterile conditions and fluoroscopic guidance, an 8F arterial catheter was advanced to the stenotic renal artery, proximal to the stenosis. Short bolus injections (4 to 6 mL) of low-osmolar nonionic contrast media (iopamidol, Isovue-370; Squibb Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ) were used to visualize the lumen of the renal artery with a fluoroscopy system (Siemens Siremobil Compact), and images were then recorded and later analyzed offline to determine the degree of RAS, as described previously.17 After angiography, in the RAS+EPC animals, EPCs (106 cells/mL suspended in 10 mL of saline) were delivered into the stenotic renal artery (for details, please see the online-only Data Supplement).
Four weeks later, all the animals were again anesthetized similarly for repeated renal angiography, which was followed by in vivo functional studies. After angiography, the catheter was positioned in the superior vena cava, and in vivo helical multidetector computed tomography (CT) flow studies were performed for assessment of basal regional renal perfusion, renal blood flow (RBF), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as detailed previously.9–11,15,18 Briefly, this involved sequential acquisition of 160 consecutive scans after a central venous injection of iopamidol (0.5 mL/kg per 2 seconds), repeated during suprarenal infusion of acetylcholine (5 µg/kg per minute) to test endothelium-dependent responses. Blood samples were collected from the inferior vena cava and both renal veins for measurement of plasma renin activity (PRA) (radioimmunoassay) and systemic asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels (Euroimmun US LLC, Boonton Twp, NJ). Urine samples were collected by suprapubic bladder puncture, and protein content was measured by spectrophotometry with the Bradford method.
After completion of all studies, the pigs were allowed to recover for a few days (to allow for contrast media washout) and were then euthanized with a lethal intravenous dose of sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg; Sleepaway, Fort Dodge Laboratories, Inc, Fort Dodge, Iowa). Both kidneys were removed from each pig with the use of a retroperitoneal incision and immersed in 4°C Krebs’ solution containing heparin. A lobe of tissue was immersed in 10% buffered formalin (Sigma, St Louis, Mo), and a segmental artery perfusing the intact end of the stenotic kidney was cannulated and prepared for micro-CT. Other lobes were shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C or preserved in formalin.10,11,15
In vitro studies were then performed to assess renal histology and expression of angiogenic and fibrotic factors. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were used to probe expression of the proangiogenic factors phosphorylated (p)-Akt, p-endothelial nitric oxide synthase (p-eNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-
, angiopoietin-1, and integrin β3. The expression of markers and mediators of renal fibrosis such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1, -smooth muscle actin (-SMA), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and -9 was also investigated. Furthermore, microvascular and renal tissue remodeling were assessed in 5-µm midhilar renal paraffin-embedded slices stained with trichrome, and the presence of resident progenitor cell in the kidney was assessed by immunoreactivity of Oct-4.19 Double immunofluorescence for DiI and CD31 or cytokeratin was used to localize the EPCs in renal vessels or tubules, respectively.
Progenitor Cells
Blood Collection and Cell Isolation
Late and early EPCs were obtained as described previously.20–24 Late EPCs were cultured from peripheral mononuclear cells collected 21 days before administration, and early EPCs were obtained from cells collected and cultured 7 days before in vivo CT studies. All cells were cultured in endothelial growth medium. An equal blend of early and late EPCs (10x106 cells) was subsequently delivered into the renal artery (see online-only Data Supplement), in agreement with their synergistic effect in promoting neovascularization20,23,24 compared with each cell type alone.
Colony-Forming Units
Colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted to assess the availability of circulating EPCs. EPC colonies consisting of multiple thin, flat cells emanating from a central cluster of rounded cells were counted after 7 days of culture in 10 random (x20) microscope fields per subject and expressed as CFU/cm2.25,26
Characterization of EPC Markers
Immunofluorescence and/or Western blotting was used to determine the monocytic (CD14), progenitor (CD34, CD133), endothelial (KDR) phenotype,27 and stem cell pluripotency (Oct-4) of early and late EPCs.
Growth Factor and Cytokine Measurement
To determine the production and secretion of growth factors by EPCs, the culture media of late EPCs were collected for measurement of VEGF levels. The cells were then homogenized, and expression of VEGF and eNOS was evaluated.
EPC Function
EPC function was tested with several accepted tests28 such as acetylated low-density lipoprotein uptake, cell migration, proliferation, and tube formation.
Preparation and Delivery of EPCs
Just before delivery, all cells were labeled with both a fluorescent membrane dye (CM-DiI) and fluorescent beads.29 CM-DiI (5 µL/mL) was added to the culture medium and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C. Fluoresbrite plain 2-µm YG (yellow-green) polymeric beads (Polysciences, Warrington, Pa) were added at a 1:25 cell-to-microspheres ratio and incubated 75 minutes at 37°C.
EPC Localization and Retention
EPC localization and retention were estimated from cells observed in kidney sections from the stenotic and contralateral kidneys.30 Labeled cells were counted manually under fluorescence microscopy in frozen 5-µm renal cross sections, the total area of each cross section was calculated, and the number of cells per square millimeter was averaged and multiplied by the section thickness and then by the total renal volume.
EPC Engraftment
Double fluorescence of CM-DiI and CD31 or cytokeratin was examined to investigate the location and phenotypical changes of EPCs into endothelial or tubular cells, respectively (see the online-only Data Supplement).
Micro-CT
A side branch of the renal artery in the dissected kidney was cannulated and infused under physiological perfusion pressure with heparinized (10 U/mL) saline, followed by the radio-opaque silicone polymer Microfil, until it filled the intrarenal vessels. For details, see the online-only Data Supplement.
Renal Protein Expression, Western Blotting, and Apoptosis
Immunohistochemistry
Staining was performed in 5-µm frozen or unstained midhilar renal cross sections to assess the expression of integrin β3, -SMA, and Oct-4. For details, see the online-only Data Supplement.
Western Blotting
Standard blotting protocols were followed, as described previously,9 with the use of specific polyclonal antibodies against p-Akt, p-eNOS, VEGF, HIF-1, angiopoietin-1, TGF-β, MMP-2 and -9, TIMP-1, CD133, KDR, and Oct-4. β-Actins or GADPH was used as loading control. Protein expression (1 band per animal) was quantified by densitometry and averaged in each group. For details, see the online-only Data Supplement.
Apoptosis
For quantification of apoptotic cells, DeadEnd Fluorometric TUNEL System (Promega) was used in 5-µm renal midhilar cross sections, as shown before.11
Data Analysis
Renal Angiography
The degree of RAS was measured by quantitative renal angiography, as described previously,9,10,15,16,31 and assessed as the decrease in luminal diameter of the renal artery at the most stenotic point compared with a proximal stenosis-free segment.
Multidetector CT Analysis
Manually traced regions of interest were selected in multidetector CT images in the aorta, renal cortex, and medulla, and time-enhancement curves were generated and analyzed to calculate RBF and GFR.
Micro-CT Analysis
Images were digitized for reconstruction of 3-dimensional volume images and analyzed with the Analyze software package (Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn), as described previously.12,32 Renal cortical microvascular density, vascular volume fraction, and single-microvascular tortuosity were calculated. For more details, see the online-only Data Supplement.
Histology
Midhilar 5-µm trichrome-stained cross sections of each kidney (1 per animal) were examined to quantify renal fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, and Oct-4 immunoreactivity, as described previously,10,11 and peritubular capillary density was similarly quantified in CD31-stained slides. For details, see the online-only Data Supplement. For quantification of angiogenic vessels, 10 fields were randomly selected from each integrin β3-stained slide (1 per animal). The stained vessels were counted manually in each field and averaged, and the results were expressed as number of integrin β3-positive vessels per field. For apoptosis, the fraction of apoptotic cells was calculated in 10 randomly selected fields in each slide, as we described previously.11
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons within groups were performed with the paired Student t test and among groups with 1-way ANOVA, with Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests for correction for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was accepted for P
0.05. For data measured over time (blood pressure), a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used, and statistical significance was accepted for P0.05.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Characterization of EPCs
Both CD14 and CD133 were initially expressed in early cells, but after 21 days the expression of KDR increased as CD14 and CD133 diminished in late cells (see the online-only Data Supplement), suggesting that late EPCs acquired endothelial characteristics. The cultured EPCs were also Oct-4 positive (see the online-only Data Supplement). The number of CFUs and EPC migration were similar in RAS compared with normal pigs, but, interestingly, cells from RAS pigs showed increased proliferation, tube formation, and secretion of angiogenic factors compared with EPCs obtained from normal pigs (see the online-only Data Supplement).
Renal Function
MAP and the angiographic degree of stenosis were similarly and significantly greater in RAS and RAS+EPC animals compared with normal animals, whereas systemic PRA and ADMA levels were similar among the groups, as was renal vein PRA (Table and Figure 1, top). Basal RBF, cortical perfusion, and GFR were all diminished in RAS, but RBF and GFR significantly improved after EPC treatment (ANOVA P<0.03 for RBF and GFR, ANOVA P=NS for perfusion). Similarly, RBF and GFR responses to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine that were blunted in RAS were restored in RAS+EPC, suggesting improved renovascular endothelial function (Figure 1, bottom). These were accompanied by a significant increase in renal expression of p-eNOS in RAS+EPC, implying greater potential for NO availability.
|
|
P<0.05 vs baseline, **P<0.05 vs normal (2-way repeated-measures ANOVA).
Angiogenic Factors
The blunted expression of proangiogenic HIF-1 and VEGF in RAS was increased after EPC treatment (ANOVA P=0.004 and P=0.01, respectively), suggesting a proangiogenic milieu in the treated RAS kidney. Furthermore, renal expression of p-Akt and p-eNOS, key mediators of VEGF, were significantly augmented in RAS+EPC compared with untreated RAS. This was accompanied in RAS+EPC by increased renal expression of integrin β3 (19.7±3.3 versus 10.6±2.8 and 12.9±1.5 positive vessels per field in RAS and normal, respectively; ANOVA P=0.02) and angiopoietin-1 (ANOVA P=0.03; Figure 2), suggesting that EPCs not only promoted angiogenesis but also favored the maturation of the new vessels.
|
Microvascular 3-Dimensional Architecture
Microvascular density was diminished in RAS across the renal cortex (inner, middle, and outer cortex). Notably, RAS+EPC substantially increased cortical microvascular density in all the cortical regions (although it remained lower than normal), resulting in improved vascular volume fraction (ANOVA P=0.0002; Figure 3). Microvascular tortuosity was significantly increased in RAS+EPC kidneys compared with both RAS and normal controls (1.87±0.09 versus 1.30±0.02 and 1.39±0.09, respectively; ANOVA P=0.0007), supporting the notion of abundant angiogenic vessels. Furthermore, CD31 expression on capillaries was significantly reduced in RAS compared with normal (0.29±0.04% versus 1.91±0.6%; P=0.01) but improved in RAS+EPC (1.13±0.6%; P=0.3 versus normal and P=0.05 versus RAS), suggesting augmented capillary proliferation in the treated kidney.
|
Renal EPCs and Morphology
An average of 13.3±0.8% of the total injected EPCs was detected 4 weeks later; the cells were evident at the tubular and vascular compartments of the treated stenotic kidneys. Some of the injected EPCs were detected incorporated in very small (capillaries and vasa vasorum) microvessels (CD31+) and in tubules (cytokeratin+) and costained with these markers, suggesting that they assumed endothelial and tubular characteristics (see Figure V in the online-only Data Supplement). Interestingly, the number of Oct-4+ cells in renal tubules was significantly increased after EPC treatment, many of which costained with DiI fluorescence, indicating that they originated from injected EPCs. Nevertheless, only EPC-treated stenotic kidneys also showed Oct-4+ cells unlabeled with DiI (Figure 4A), suggesting activation and mobilization of circulating or resident stem cells (Figure 4B).
|
RAS kidneys showed increased expression of TGF-β and -SMA and decreased MMP-2 (Figure 5A), which were accompanied by increased glomerulosclerosis and perivascular and tubulointerstitial fibrosis compared with normal controls (Figure 5B), overall suggesting renal remodeling. Importantly, EPCs improved the expression of those factors and decreased fibrosis in the stenotic kidney, without fully normalizing it (ANOVA P=0.001). Conversely, EPCs did not affect apoptosis, as the fraction of apoptotic cells was significantly and similarly elevated in RAS and RAS+EPC compared with normal (0.59±0.1%, 0.52±0.2%, and 0.09±0.01%, respectively; P<0.04).
|
Contralateral Kidney
The presence of labeled cells and changes in morphology in the contralateral kidney were determined. Interestingly, although few EPCs were observed in the contralateral kidney of RAS+EPC animals (1 to 2 cells per slide), VEGF expression was increased compared with both normal and untreated RAS pigs. However, unlike the RAS+EPC kidney, the contralateral kidney of RAS and RAS+EPC animals did not show any changes in tubulointerstitial fibrosis (2.09±0.1% and 1.83±0.05%, respectively; P<0.01 versus normal), blunted number of capillaries (0.64±0.04% and 0.70±0.04%, respectively; P<0.05 versus normal), or renal expression of TGF-β (elevated compared with normal), MMP-2 and -9 (unchanged), and TIMP-1 (attenuated compared with normal), implying lack of effect of these cells in remodeling of the contralateral kidney (Figure 6). Apoptosis also remained evident (1.22±0.47 and 1.07±0.30, respectively; P<0.05 versus normal).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The present study shows, for the first time, the feasibility of a cell-based approach to treat the ischemic kidney distal to the stenosis. A single intrarenal infusion of autologous EPCs during the evolution of RAS restored the hemodynamics and function of the ischemic kidney, preserved microvascular architecture, and attenuated renal remodeling. The capability of EPCs to restore vascular integrity and preserve the stenotic kidney may therefore enable development of novel therapeutic renoprotective strategies in chronic renovascular disease.
Renovascular disease is often associated with atherosclerosis but constitutes a strong predictor for increasing morbidity and mortality independent of other cardiovascular risk factors,8 as is a decrease in GFR.33 Renal disease is often characterized by decreased microvascular density as well as tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which are determinants of renal outcomes.34 Regression of intrarenal microvasculature accompanies many forms of renal disease such as diabetes and aging, and microvascular remodeling correlates with development of renal scarring.35 Indeed, we have previously shown that renal injury is evident by 1 month after development of the RAS16,31 and that deterioration of renal hemodynamics and function is paralleled by significant fibrosis,10,11 microvascular rarefaction, and remodeling.9,12 Microvascular and parenchymal damage distal to the obstruction likely contributes to renal dysfunction observed in humans with chronic renovascular disease despite revascularization, but few therapeutic options are available to restore renal viability and vascular integrity.
In many ischemic and injured organs, mobilization, homing, and transdifferentiation of EPCs play an important role in augmenting neovascularization36 and endothelial replacement after vascular injury.22,24 EPCs augment angiogenesis both by stimulating the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and by providing a source of progenitor cells that can differentiate into mature vascular endothelial cells. They appear to confer their beneficial effect not only by their long-term engraftment and local retention in the injured tissue but also by transient secretion of vascular growth factors within this region.37 Yet, despite the promise of EPC delivery in treating diseases associated with blood vessel disorders, the potential of this strategy to salvage the ischemic kidney in RAS has not been explored. The present study indicates that this strategy is feasible and effective. In the present study, we delivered into the stenotic kidney a combination of early EPCs, which retain monocytic characteristics and avid angiogenic activity, and late EPCs, which exhibit more mature endothelial-like features. Previous studies have demonstrated that these cell types synergistically enhance angiogenesis more effectively than each cell type alone.20 This intervention elicited new vessel formation and reversed most of the functional and structural deterioration of the stenotic kidney. We observed that some of the injected cells assumed endothelial and tubular phenotypes and incorporated into renal structures. However, when the relatively small number of EPCs retained in the tissue is considered, their autocrine and paracrine activities were likely key for the increase in protein expression and improvement in renal function.
Angiogenesis involves a sequence of events regulated by numerous factors that results in development of new vessels. Among those factors, VEGF is crucial for preservation of the microvasculature and, in concert with other factors, stimulates processes responsible for cell division, migration, and survival, extracellular matrix degradation, and tube formation that generate, repair, and maintain microvascular networks. We have previously shown both HIF-1 and VEGF to be paradoxically downregulated in chronic RAS,9,12 attended by microvascular rarefaction and renal fibrosis. HIF-1 is the most important transcription factor driving VEGF mRNA expression and production and is considered a crucial primary defense mechanism for the adaptive response to ischemia in the kidney.38 Remarkably, intrarenal administration of EPCs in the stenotic kidney restored HIF-1, VEGF, eNOS, Akt, and angiopoietin-1, all of which stimulate or mediate angiogenesis. Angiopoietin-1 is an endothelial cell survival factor that in concert with VEGF can promote angiogenesis, maturation of the new vessels, and vascular repair,39 and the concurrent improvement of both may have had an additive effect on vascular proliferation and maturation in RAS+EPC.40 Augmented neovascularization was also reflected by the increases in renal expression of integrin β3, peritubular CD31+ capillaries, microvascular density, and tortuosity, which are all indices of angiogenic vessels. Therefore, EPCs not only attenuated microvascular dysfunction and rarefaction in RAS but also improved maturation and stabilization of the new vessels, thereby improving the overall hemodynamics and function of the stenotic kidney. Although apoptosis remained elevated in RAS+EPC, this therapeutic approach significantly decreased the scarring in the stenotic kidney, possibly as a result of increased blood supply and NO availability after EPC treatment. Furthermore, it may have also been related to a decreased fibrogenic activity and improved matrix turnover, as suggested by the improved expression of TGF-β and MMP-2 and decreased fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis in RAS+EPC, which in turn may have facilitated restoration of the microvascular network as well.
The number of CFUs that we found is comparable to previous studies in which similar techniques were used.26 We observed that CFUs were similar in normal and RAS animals, suggesting that circulating EPCs were not depleted in RAS, yet RAS EPCs showed increased proliferation potential and better angiogenic function (tube formation) compared with controls. These characteristics differ from EPC function in humans with chronic refractory hypertension41 but are more consistent with other clinical studies on EPCs in essential or pregnancy-induced hypertension42,43 or with recent studies in comparable models.44 It is possible that duration and nature of the disease, as well as species differences, may have contributed to these differences. For example, a preferential increase in PRA at the early stage (4 to 5 weeks) of the disease31 might favor angiotensin II–mediated angiogenic activity45 that would gradually dissipate as the disease progresses and oxidative stress increases.31 Interestingly, the present study shows that delivery of autologous EPCs into the stenotic kidney also increased number of cells positive for Oct-4, a stem cell transcription factor and marker suggestive of pluripotency.19 Although many of these were likely the Oct-4+–injected EPCs, at least some of them were not labeled with the EPC markers, suggesting that this intervention also promoted mobilization of resident or homing of endogenous circulating progenitor cells. Either by incorporating and differentiating in the tissue host and/or by autocrine and paracrine activity, EPCs are capable of stimulating the function and proliferation of surrounding progenitor and mature cells.20 Importantly, some of the injected EPCs were detected engrafted into blood vessels and tubules and assumed at least some endothelial and tubular features (CD31 and cytokeratin expression), although the level of functionality that the engrafted cells achieved remains to be determined. Interestingly, EPCs were observed incorporated only in very small microvascular vessels, likely peritubular capillaries and vasa vasorum, but not in larger vessels. Presumably, longer transit times and greater surface area facilitate their contact, adherence, retention, and migration into tissue structures.
Importantly, our study showed that EPCs restored the blunted RBF and GFR of the RAS kidney, which might be a result of the preserved microvasculature but also is likely due to augmented availability of eNOS-derived NO, as implied by the increased renal expression of activated eNOS.5 In turn, NO is indispensable for microvascular sprouting by maintaining vasodilation during the early steps of angiogenesis46 and by promoting VEGF-induced capillary proliferation.47 Furthermore, eNOS-derived NO might have contributed to enhance Oct-4 expression in resident progenitor cells and promoted endothelial differentiation48 in the RAS+EPC kidney. Hence, upregulated eNOS not only favored renal microvascular endothelial function but may have also contributed to angiogenesis in the RAS+EPC kidney. Moreover, VEGF is also a potent vasodilator that may have contributed to recovering endothelial function in RAS+EPC.49 It is interesting that although the degree of stenosis and hypertension in RAS remained unchanged by EPCs, renal function improved with intrarenal EPC therapy. Although the remaining obstruction of the renal artery and decrease in renal perfusion pressure might have been sufficient to activate the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system, renal vein PRA did not lateralize to the stenotic side. Alternatively, an increase in oxidative stress may also sustain hypertension at the chronic phase of untreated RAS when PRA declines.31 In addition, we cannot rule out the possibility that disease in the contralateral kidney results in volume retention and thereby mediates hypertension. Indeed, the sustained fibrosis and decreased capillary density in both the stenotic and contralateral kidneys indicate residual injury that might have also contributed to the persistent hypertension.
In summary, the present study shows the renoprotective effects of EPCs in a model of chronic RAS. A targeted intervention using autologous EPCs during the evolution of the disease reversed most of the functional and structural deterioration of the stenotic kidney in this otherwise progressive disease. It is likely that restoration of the angiogenic cascade by autologous EPCs involved not only generation of new vessels but also acceleration of their maturation and stabilization. This contributed to preserving the blood supply, hemodynamics, and function of the RAS kidney and thereby decreased renal remodeling. Future studies are needed to examine the feasibility of this approach after a longer duration of chronic renal ischemia in humans and in the presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors are grateful to Mark E. Rosenberg, MD, University of Minnesota, for his advice on the Oct-4 staining technique.
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by grants DK-73608, DK-77013, HL-77131, PO1HL085307, HL-75566, and HL-76611 from the National Institutes of Health and by an unrestricted grant from the GlaxoSmithKline Research and Education Foundation for Cardiovascular Disease.
Disclosures
None.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Rafii S, Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 702–712.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization and role in vascular biology. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 343–353.
3. Kawamoto A, Murayama T, Kusano K, Ii M, Tkebuchava T, Shintani S, Iwakura A, Johnson I, von Samson P, Hanley A, Gavin M, Curry C, Silver M, Ma H, Kearney M, Losordo DW. Synergistic effect of bone marrow mobilization and vascular endothelial growth factor-2 gene therapy in myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1398–1405.
4. Napoli C, Williams-Ignarro S, de Nigris F, de Rosa G, Lerman LO, Farzati B, Matarazzo A, Sica G, Botti C, Fiore A, Byrns RE, Sumi D, Sica V, Ignarro LJ. Beneficial effects of concurrent autologous bone marrow cell therapy and metabolic intervention in ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the mouse hindlimb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 17202–17206.
5. Urbich C, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Sasaki K, Bruhl T, Farhadi MR, Vajkoczy P, Hofmann WK, Peters C, Pennacchio LA, Abolmaali ND, Chavakis E, Reinheckel T, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Cathepsin L is required for endothelial progenitor cell-induced neovascularization. Nat Med. 2005; 11: 206–213.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Patschan D, Krupincza K, Patschan S, Zhang Z, Hamby C, Goligorsky MS. Dynamics of mobilization and homing of endothelial progenitor cells after acute renal ischemia: modulation by ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol. 2006; 291: F176–F185.[CrossRef]
7. Abe-Yoshio Y, Abe K, Miyazaki M, Furusu A, Nishino T, Harada T, Koji T, Kohno S. Involvement of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells in glomerular capillary repair in habu snake venom-induced glomerulonephritis. Virchows Arch. 2008; 453: 97–106.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Edwards MS, Craven TE, Burke GL, Dean RH, Hansen KJ. Renovascular disease and the risk of adverse coronary events in the elderly: a prospective, population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 207–213.
9. Chade AR, Zhu X, Mushin OP, Napoli C, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Simvastatin promotes angiogenesis and prevents microvascular remodeling in chronic renal ischemia. FASEB J. 2006; 20: 1706–1708.
10. Chade AR, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Grande JP, Krier JD, Lerman A, Romero JC, Napoli C, Lerman LO. Distinct renal injury in early atherosclerosis and renovascular disease. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1165–1171.
11. Chade AR, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Grande JP, Zhu X, Sica V, Napoli C, Sawamura T, Textor SC, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Mechanisms of renal structural alterations in combined hypercholesterolemia and renal artery stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1295–1301.
12. Zhu XY, Chade AR, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Bentley MD, Ritman EL, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Cortical microvascular remodeling in the stenotic kidney: role of increased oxidative stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1854–1859.
13. Togel F, Hu Z, Weiss K, Isaac J, Lange C, Westenfelder C. Administered mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic acute renal failure through differentiation-independent mechanisms. Am J Physiol. 2005; 289: F31–F42.
14. Uchimura H, Marumo T, Takase O, Kawachi H, Shimizu F, Hayashi M, Saruta T, Hishikawa K, Fujita T. Intrarenal injection of bone marrow-derived angiogenic cells reduces endothelial injury and mesangial cell activation in experimental glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 997–1004.
15. Chade AR, Bentley MD, Zhu X, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Niemeyer S, Amores-Arriaga B, Napoli C, Ritman EL, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Antioxidant intervention prevents renal neovascularization in hypercholesterolemic pigs. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 1816–1825.
16. Lerman LO, Schwartz RS, Grande JP, Sheedy PF, Romero JC. Noninvasive evaluation of a novel swine model of renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: 1455–1465.
17. Chade AR, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Herrmann J, Zhu X, Grande JP, Napoli C, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Antioxidant intervention blunts renal injury in experimental renovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 958–966.
18. Daghini E, Primak AN, Chade AR, Krier JD, Zhu X, McCollough CH, Lerman LO. Assessment of renal hemodynamics and function using 64-slice multidetector CT: comparison with EBCT. Radiology. 2007; 243: 405–412.
19. Gupta S, Verfaillie C, Chmielewski D, Kren S, Eidman K, Connaire J, Heremans Y, Lund T, Blackstad M, Jiang Y, Luttun A, Rosenberg ME. Isolation and characterization of kidney-derived stem cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17: 3028–3040.
20. Yoon CH, Hur J, Park KW, Kim JH, Lee CS, Oh IY, Kim TY, Cho HJ, Kang HJ, Chae IH, Yang HK, Oh BH, Park YB, Kim HS. Synergistic neovascularization by mixed transplantation of early endothelial progenitor cells and late outgrowth endothelial cells: the role of angiogenic cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1618–1627.
21. Hur J, Yoon CH, Kim HS, Choi JH, Kang HJ, Hwang KK, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB. Characterization of two types of endothelial progenitor cells and their different contributions to neovasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 288–293.
22. Gulati R, Jevremovic D, Peterson TE, Chatterjee S, Shah V, Vile RG, Simari RD. Diverse origin and function of cells with endothelial phenotype obtained from adult human blood. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 1023–1025.
23. Gulati R, Jevremovic D, Peterson TE, Witt TA, Kleppe LS, Mueske CS, Lerman A, Vile RG, Simari RD. Autologous culture-modified mononuclear cells confer vascular protection after arterial injury. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1520–1526.
24. Gulati R, Jevremovic D, Witt TA, Kleppe LS, Vile RG, Lerman A, Simari RD. Modulation of the vascular response to injury by autologous blood-derived outgrowth endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 2004; 287: H512–H517.
25. Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 593–600.
26. Choi JH, Kim KL, Huh W, Kim B, Byun J, Suh W, Sung J, Jeon ES, Oh HY, Kim DK. Decreased number and impaired angiogenic function of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with chronic renal failure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1246–1252.
27. Lin Y, Weisdorf DJ, Solovey A, Hebbel RP. Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 71–77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Dzau VJ, Gnecchi M, Pachori AS, Morello F, Melo LG. Therapeutic potential of endothelial progenitor cells in cardiovascular diseases. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 7–18.
29. Pislaru SV, Van Ranst M, Pislaru C, Szelid Z, Theilmeier G, Ossewaarde JM, Holvoet P, Janssens S, Verbeken E, Van de Werf FJ. Chlamydia pneumoniae induces neointima formation in coronary arteries of normal pigs. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 57: 834–842.
30. Moore XL, Lu J, Sun L, Zhu CJ, Tan P, Wong MC. Endothelial progenitor cells’ "homing" specificity to brain tumors. Gene Ther. 2004; 11: 811–818.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Lerman LO, Nath KA, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Krier JD, Schwartz RS, Napoli C, Romero JC. Increased oxidative stress in experimental renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 541–546.
32. Zhu X, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Bentley MD, Chade AR, Sica V, Napoli C, Caplice N, Ritman EL, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Antioxidant intervention attenuates myocardial neovascularization in hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2109–2115.
33. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, McCullough PA, Kasiske BL, Kelepouris E, Klag MJ, Parfrey P, Pfeffer M, Raij L, Spinosa DJ, Wilson PW. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 1050–1065.
34. Wright JR, Duggal A, Thomas R, Reeve R, Roberts IS, Kalra PA. Clinicopathological correlation in biopsy-proven atherosclerotic nephropathy: implications for renal functional outcome in atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001; 16: 765–770.
35. Kang DH, Kanellis J, Hugo C, Truong L, Anderson S, Kerjaschki D, Schreiner GF, Johnson RJ. Role of the microvascular endothelium in progressive renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13: 806–816.
36. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Rehman J, Li J, Orschell CM, March KL. Peripheral blood "endothelial progenitor cells" are derived from monocyte/macrophages and secrete angiogenic growth factors. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1164–1169.
38. Manotham K, Tanaka T, Ohse T, Kojima I, Miyata T, Inagi R, Tanaka H, Sassa R, Fujita T, Nangaku M. A biologic role of HIF-1 in the renal medulla. Kidney Int. 2005; 67: 1428–1439.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Satchell SC, Anderson KL, Mathieson PW. Angiopoietin 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor modulate human glomerular endothelial cell barrier properties. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 566–574.
40. Chae JK, Kim I, Lim ST, Chung MJ, Kim WH, Kim HG, Ko JK, Koh GY. Coadministration of angiopoietin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor enhances collateral vascularization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2573–2578.
41. Oliveras A, Soler MJ, Martinez-Estrada OM, Vazquez S, Marco-Feliu D, Vila JS, Vilaro S, Lloveras J. Endothelial progenitor cells are reduced in refractory hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2008; 22: 183–190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Buemi M, Allegra A, D'Anna R, Coppolino G, Crasci E, Giordano D, Loddo S, Cucinotta M, Musolino C, Teti D. Concentration of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in normal pregnancy and in pregnant women with diabetes and hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 68 e61–e66.
43. Delva P, Degan M, Vallerio P, Arosio E, Minuz P, Amen G, Di Chio M, Lechi A. Endothelial progenitor cells in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: 127–132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Salguero G, Akin E, Templin C, Kotlarz D, Doerries C, Landmesser U, Grote K, Schieffer B. Renovascular hypertension by two-kidney one-clip enhances endothelial progenitor cell mobilization in a p47phox-dependent manner. J Hypertens. 2008; 26: 257–268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Hu C, Dandapat A, Mehta JL. Angiotensin II induces capillary formation from endothelial cells via the LOX-1 dependent redox-sensitive pathway. Hypertension. 2007; 50: 952–957.
46. Kon K, Fujii S, Kosaka H, Fujiwara T. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester retards vascular sprouting in angiogenesis. Microvasc Res. 2003; 65: 2–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Milkiewicz M, Hudlicka O, Brown MD, Silgram H. Nitric oxide, VEGF, and VEGFR-2: interactions in activity-induced angi -ogenesis in rat skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 2005; 289: H336–H343.
48. Chu L, Jiang Y, Hao H, Xia Y, Xu J, Liu Z, Verfaillie CM, Zweier JL, Liu Z. Nitric oxide enhances Oct-4 expression in bone marrow stem cells and promotes endothelial differentiation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008; 591: 59–65.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Schrijvers BF, Flyvbjerg A, Tilton RG, Lameire NH, De Vriese AS. A neutralizing VEGF antibody prevents glomerular hypertrophy in a model of obese type 2 diabetes, the Zucker diabetic fatty rat. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21: 324–329.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
*The first 2 authors contributed equally to this work.
The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788653/DC1.
Related Article:
Circulation 2009 119: 487-488.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||