| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1995;91:23-27.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the National Public Health Institute (O.V., M.P., K.A., T.P.); and the First Department of Medicine (M.M., V.M., L.T.), University of Helsinki, Finland.
Correspondence to Outi Vaarala, MD, National Public Health Institute, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300 Helsinki, Finland.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results The sera to be studied were drawn at
entry from middle-aged dyslipidemic men (nonhigh-density lipoprotein
cholesterol,
5.2 mmol/L) participating in the Helsinki Heart Study, a
5-year coronary primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil. Samples were
tested for IgG-class antibodies to cardiolipin by an ELISA. The risk
was estimated with logistic regression analysis using a nested
case-control design with 133 patients (myocardial infarction or cardiac
death) and 133 control subjects, matched for treatment
(gemfibrozil/placebo) and geographical area. The aCL antibody level, as
expressed in optical density units, was significantly higher in
patients than in control subjects (0.417 versus 0.361;
P<.005). Subjects with the antibody level in the highest
quartile of distribution had a relative risk for myocardial infarction
of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.5) compared with the
remainder of the population. This risk was independent of confounding
factors, such as age, smoking, systolic blood pressure, low-density
lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein. There was a
correlation between the levels of aCL antibodies and antibodies to
oxidized LDL (r=.40, P<.001), and their joint
effect was additive for the risk.
Conclusions In a prospective cohort of healthy middle-aged men, the presence of a high aCL antibody level is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Antibodies to cardiolipin and oxidized LDL may, at least in part, represent cross-reactive antibody populations.
Key Words: lipoproteins antibodies thrombosis infarction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hamsten et al3 observed an increased prevalence of patients with elevated anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibody levels in a highly selected series of young patients with myocardial infarction. Furthermore, high titers of these antibodies appeared to serve as a marker of high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. In accordance with this, Klemp et al4 reported an association between elevated levels of aCL antibodies and ischemic heart disease. After these reports, there have been three studies on myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease in which the frequency of elevated aCL antibodies was not appreciably higher in patients than in control subjects, and such antibodies were not predictive for subsequent cardiovascular complications.5 6 7 All of these studies were performed on survivors of myocardial infarction or in patients with established coronary heart disease. In the present report, we investigated the association between aCL antibodies and the risk of myocardial infarction in a cohort of initially healthy middle-aged dyslipidemic men.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5.2 mmol/L)
middle-aged men. The study population was selected by screening from a
cohort of 19 000 male employees in private and government-owned
industries.8 Gemfibrozil treatment was associated with a
34% reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease during the
5-year double-blind period,9 10 and the favorable
trend is
continuing during the extended open-label follow-up.11
A
total of 140 of 4081 subjects in the Helsinki Heart Study population
had a cardiac end point, either cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial
infarction, during the double-blind study period. For the present
study, serum drawn at baseline in 1981 through 1982 and preserved at
-20°C was available from 133 patients with cardiac end points (26
cardiac deaths and 107 nonfatal myocardial infarctions). A control
subject without an end point was selected for each patient using drug
treatment (gemfibrozil/placebo) and the clinic in the study
organization as matching variables. The differences in classic coronary
risk factors in patients and control subjects are given in Table
1
.
|
Antibody Assays
Cardiolipin-binding antibodies were detected
by ELISA as
previously described.12 The analyses were done blinded
without knowledge of the case-control status. The assay was
standardized using reference sera prepared by the Lupus Research
Laboratory, Rayne Institute, St Thomas Hospital. Briefly, polystyrene
plates (Nunc) were coated with cardiolipin (Sigma Chemical Co) at a
concentration of 48 µg/mL in ethanol. Human serum albumin (HSA)
solution (Finnish Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service) diluted to 1%
in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used as a
ß2-glycoprotein Icontaining blocking solution. The
presence of human ß2-glycoprotein I in HSA solution was
demonstrated by immunoblotting using polyclonal
antiß2-glycoprotein I antibodies (Boehringer Mannheim).
Serum samples were analyzed in duplicate at a serum dilution of 1:50 in
0.2% HSA-PBS. Alkaline phosphataseconjugated rabbit anti-human IgG
(Jackson ImmunoResearch) in 0.2% HSA-PBS was used as the second
antibody. The results were expressed as optical density (OD) units.
Antibodies to oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were detected by ELISA as previously described,12 and data on the occurrence of these antibodies are reported elsewhere.13
Statistical Analysis
The differences in continuous baseline
variables were estimated
using either t test or ANOVA. The
2 test was
applied to class variables. For the study of associations between aCL
antibody levels and classic risk factors, Pearson's correlation
coefficients were calculated. A logistic regression analysis
(EGRET, Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corp) was used
to study the associations between the aCL antibody level and coronary
heart disease. The joint effects of the antibody and other risk factors
(lipid levels, smoking, and leukocyte count) on coronary risk were also
studied. A new variable was added to the model representing the
combinations of categories of aCL antibodies (highest quartile/others)
and the other risk factor, eg, LDL (highest tertile/others). This
approach is similar to a stratified analysis, except that all
combinations of LDL and aCL antibody levels are simultaneously
present in the calculations.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The aCL antibody levels were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers (0.409±0.165 versus 0.370±0.142, P<.05) and only 13 of 42 patients (31%) with elevated aCL antibody levels (highest quartile) were nonsmokers.
There was a relatively close correlation between the levels of aCL antibodies and antibodies against oxidized LDL (r=.40, P<.001). The association with lipid levels disclosed a variable pattern. In patients, the correlation coefficients between the antibody levels and lipids were .15 (P=.08) for LDL, .09 (P=.3) for HDL cholesterol, and -.21 (P<.03) for triglycerides (TG). The corresponding coefficients in control subjects were .24 (P<.005) for LDL, -.14 (P=.09) for HDL, and -.07 (P=.2) for TG. In logistic regression analysis, the risk associated with aCL antibody level when used as a continuous variable was significant (P<.03) and independent of confounding factors such as age, smoking, systolic blood pressure, LDL, and HDL. When tertile distribution of the antibody was in the model and the risk in the lowest tertile was used as reference, the odds ratios (ORs) in the middle and high tertiles were 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 2.6) and 1.8 (95% CI, 0.9 to 3.3). An increased risk at conventional significance level (P<.04) was found only in the highest quartile (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.5) of the aCL antibody distribution.
When considered jointly, both elevated aCL antibodies (OR, 2.3; 95%
CI, 1.0 to 5.3) and high LDL (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.5-5.8) had an
independent contribution to coronary risk. Simultaneous elevation of
both of these produced no additional risk (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to
6.2). A similar risk pattern was detected for the joint effect of
elevated aCL antibody and low HDL with no additional risk in the
combination category. However, a different pattern was found for the
joint effect of the antibody and TG, with the increased risk in the
joint category only (Table 2
). Simultaneous elevations
of aCL antibodies and antibodies against oxidized LDL resulted in an
increased risk that was close to additive (Table 3
). A
similar pattern was found in joint effects with elevated leukocyte
count (WBC; highest tertile). The OR was 2.0 (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.2) in
the elevated-antibody-only category and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.2) in
the elevated-WBC-only category, whereas OR was 3.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to
8.9) in the joint category. The increment in risk associated with
simultaneous smoking and elevated aCL antibody was close to
multiplicative in statistical terms (Table 4
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thus, the results of our prospective study are in agreement with two earlier works,3 4 but they disagree with findings of three other studies of the prevalence of aCL antibodies in patients with myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease.5 6 7 There may be several reasons for these discrepancies. First, our report was prospective and the participants were free of coronary artery disease at entry, whereas all other studies included survivors of myocardial infarction or patients with established ischemic heart disease. Second, there are differences in the study populations. For example, our study subjects had been selected on the basis of high LDL cholesterol concentration, whereas those investigated by Hamsten et al3 were <45 years old.
Third, differences in test techniques may be involved. There is evidence that aPL antibodies in patients with SLE are directed against an antigenic complex containing not only anionic phospholipids but also a plasma apolipoprotein H (ß2-glycoprotein I).14 On the other hand, aCL antibodies occurring in infectious diseases appear to bind to pure anionic phospholipids.15 In our assay, HSA was used as a blocking buffer and serum diluent. The blocking buffer contains as an impurity ß2-glycoprotein I. However, this kind of cofactor-containing ELISA also detects aCL antibodies independent of the cofactor. Others had used bovine serum,4 6 or there was no exogenous source of cofactor,3 or information on the composition of the blocking buffer was not given.5 7
We have shown earlier that the IgG class aCL antibody level was marginally higher in patients with ischemic heart disease than in community-based healthy control subjects and that there was a statistically significant increase in the antibody level as observed in paired specimens taken after myocardial infarction.16 Others, too, have documented a rise in the aCL antibody level after myocardial infarction,6 possibly due to an immunological response to tissue necrosis.
It is commonly believed that only clearly elevated aPL antibodies are clinically significant. Thus, in a recent population-based case-control study, there was an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism appearing above the 98th percentile of aCL antibody distribution of the control subjects.17 However, our data appear to indicate that even lower levels might carry an excess risk.
Because aCL antibodies in healthy subjects were shown to predict myocardial infarction, it is possible that at least in some instances they could be directly involved in the pathogenesis of thrombotic events. Causality speculations based on statistical interactions are highly questionable. However, in light of the accumulated experimental and clinical evidence, this circumstantial evidence could be interpreted to support a role for aPL antibodies in the thrombogenesis rather than in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. In particular, the interactions between aCL antibodies and smoking, leukocyte count, or TG support this conclusion, since all of these coronary risk factors are known to be associated with hypercoagulative stages.18 19 20 Several different mechanisms for the involvement of aPL antibodies in thrombogenesis have been proposed.21 For example, aPL antibodies may bind to the membranes of thrombocytes or of vascular endothelial cells and alter the function of these cells. However, the antibodies are directed against phospholipid components that are normally not exposed in the outer membrane leaflet of inactivated platelets or intact endothelial cells. Thus, some primary change in the membrane is needed before the action of aPL antibodies. The observation that aCL antibodies in patients with SLE (in contrast to infection-associated aCL antibodies) bind to a complex of cardiolipin and ß2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H) rather than to a cardiolipin alone14 has aroused the idea that aCL antibodies may interfere in vivo with the function of ß2-glycoprotein I, which is, among other things, an inhibitor of the intrinsic pathway of coagulation. On the other hand, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that infections can play a role in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease.22 A transient aCL antibody response takes place in a variety of bacterial and viral infections, and elevated levels can persist in many chronic infections, notably syphilis.2 Thus, it is possible that aCL antibodies in our study subjects reflect some chronic infection, for example, chlamydial infection, which has been associated with coronary heart disease.23 24 25 Actually, antibodies against chlamydial lipopolysaccharide may cross-react with anionic phospholipids in ELISA.26
We have demonstrated a cross-reaction between aCL antibodies and antibodies against oxidized LDL in patients with SLE.12 Such a cross-reaction was by no means unexpected taking into account the structural similarity between the LDL molecule and the complex consisting of cardiolipin and ß2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H). Antibodies against oxidized LDL have been associated with the progression of carotid atherosclerosis.27 As described in detail elsewhere,13 the present sera were also tested for antibodies against oxidized LDL. A clear association was noted between the presence of these two antibody moieties. Despite this, both antibodies had an independent contribution to coronary risk, and their joint effect was additive in statistical terms. Nevertheless, it is possible that part of the effect of aPL antibodies could be mediated via a cross-reacting property directed against oxidized LDL.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 21, 1994; accepted July 31, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Su, X. Hua, H. Concha, E. Svenungsson, A. Cederholm, and J. Frostegard Natural antibodies against phosphorylcholine as potential protective factors in SLE Rheumatology, August 1, 2008; 47(8): 1144 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Frostegard Systemic lupus erythematosus and cardiovascular disease Lupus, May 1, 2008; 17(5): 364 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Wei Hsi Chen, Hung Sheng Lin, Yi Fen Kao, Min Yu Lan, and Jia Shou Liu Hyperhomocysteinemia Relates to the Subtype of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Non-SLE Patients Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, October 1, 2007; 13(4): 398 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Christodoulou, S. Sangle, and D. P. D'Cruz Vasculopathy and arterial stenotic lesions in the antiphospholipid syndrome Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 907 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sherer, R. Gerli, B. Gilburd, E. Bartoloni Bocci, G. Vaudo, E. Mannarino, and Y. Shoenfeld Thickened carotid artery intima-media in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with elevated anticardiolipin antibodies Lupus, April 1, 2007; 16(4): 259 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. N. Bruce 'Not only...but also': factors that contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease in systemic lupus erythematosus Rheumatology, December 1, 2005; 44(12): 1492 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shoenfeld, R. Gerli, A. Doria, E. Matsuura, M. M. Cerinic, N. Ronda, L. J. Jara, M. Abu-Shakra, P. L. Meroni, and Y. Sherer Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Circulation, November 22, 2005; 112(21): 3337 - 3347. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Feinbloom and K. A. Bauer Assessment of Hemostatic Risk Factors in Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(10): 2043 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Frostegard Atherosclerosis in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1776 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kahles, M. Humpich, H. Steinmetz, M. Sitzer, and E. Lindhoff-Last Phosphatidylserine IgG and beta-2-glycoprotein I IgA antibodies may be a risk factor for ischaemic stroke Rheumatology, September 1, 2005; 44(9): 1161 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Turiel, P. Sarzi-Puttini, R. Peretti, E. Rossi, F. Atzeni, W. Parsons, and A. Doria Thrombotic Risk Factors In Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A 5-Year Prospective Study Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1490 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jimenez, M. A. Garcia-Criado, D. Tassies, J. C. Reverter, R. Cervera, M. R. Gilabert, D. Zambon, E. Ros, C. Bru, and J. Font Preclinical vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary antiphospholipid syndrome Rheumatology, June 1, 2005; 44(6): 756 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cederholm, E. Svenungsson, K. Jensen-Urstad, C. Trollmo, A.-K. Ulfgren, J. Swedenborg, G.-Z. Fei, and J. Frostegard Decreased Binding of Annexin V to Endothelial Cells: A Potential Mechanism in Atherothrombosis of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 198 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. N Bruce Coronary heart disease (CHD) in lupus: round up the usual suspects? Lupus, August 1, 2004; 13(8): 557 - 560. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ozturk, I. C. Haznedaroglu, M. Turgut, and H. Goker Current Debates in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Acquired Antibody-Mediated Thrombophilia Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 89 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schattner and M. H. Liang The Cardiovascular Burden of Lupus: A Complex Challenge Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2003; 163(13): 1507 - 1510. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R L Brey, J Chapman, S R Levine, G Ruiz-Irastorza, R H. Derksen, M Khamashta, and Y Shoenfeld Stroke and the antiphospholipid syndrome: consensus meeting Taormina 2002 Lupus, July 1, 2003; 12(7): 508 - 513. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Vlachoyiannopoulos, P. G. Kanellopoulos, J. P. A. Ioannidis, M. G. Tektonidou, I. Mastorakou, and H. M. Moutsopoulos Atherosclerosis in premenopausal women with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus: a controlled study Rheumatology, May 1, 2003; 42(5): 645 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Galli, D. Luciani, G. Bertolini, and T. Barbui Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature Blood, March 1, 2003; 101(5): 1827 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. A. Ioannidis, G. E. Katsifis, E. D. Stavropoulos, M. N. Manoussakis, and H. M. Moutsopoulos Evaluation of the association of autoantibodies with mortality in the very elderly: a cohort study Rheumatology, February 1, 2003; 42(2): 357 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L Ruberg and J. Loscalzo Prothrombotic determinants of coronary atherothrombosis Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2002; 7(4): 289 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Pai, G. C. Curhan, C. C. Cannuscio, N. Rifai, P. M. Ridker, and E. B. Rimm Stability of Novel Plasma Markers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease: Processing within 36 Hours of Specimen Collection Clin. Chem., October 1, 2002; 48(10): 1781 - 1784. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Brey, C. L. Stallworth, D. L. McGlasson, M. A. Wozniak, R. J. Wityk, B. J. Stern, M. A. Sloan, R. Sherwin, T. R. Price, R. F. Macko, et al. Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke in Young Women * Editorial Comment Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2396 - 2401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Cvetkovic, S. Wallberg-Jonsson, E. Ahmed, S. Rantapaa-Dahlqvist, and A. K. Lefvert Increased levels of autoantibodies against copper-oxidized low density lipoprotein, malondialdehyde-modified low density lipoprotein and cardiolipin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, September 1, 2002; 41(9): 988 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Erkan, Y. Yazici, M. G. Peterson, L. Sammaritano, and M. D. Lockshin A cross-sectional study of clinical thrombotic risk factors and preventive treatments in antiphospholipid syndrome Rheumatology, August 1, 2002; 41(8): 924 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Levine, D. W. Branch, and J. Rauch The Antiphospholipid Syndrome N. Engl. J. Med., March 7, 2002; 346(10): 752 - 763. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Sherer and Y Shoenfeld Atherosclerosis Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2002; 61(2): 97 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Svenungsson, K. Jensen-Urstad, M. Heimburger, A. Silveira, A. Hamsten, U. de Faire, J. L. Witztum, and J. Frostegard Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1887 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Brey, R. D. Abbott, J. D. Curb, D. S. Sharp, G. W. Ross, C. L. Stallworth, and S. J. Kittner {beta}2-Glycoprotein 1-Dependent Anticardiolipin Antibodies and Risk of Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction: The Honolulu Heart Program Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1701 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pratico, R. K. Tangirala, S. Horkko, J. L. Witztum, W. Palinski, and G. A. FitzGerald Circulating autoantibodies to oxidized cardiolipin correlate with isoprostane F2{alpha}-VI levels and the extent of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice: modulation by vitamin E Blood, January 15, 2001; 97(2): 459 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mustafa, S. Nityanand, L. Berglund, H. Lithell, and A. K. Lefvert Circulating Immune Complexes in 50-Year-Old Men as a Strong and Independent Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction Circulation, November 21, 2000; 102(21): 2576 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bili, A. J. Moss, C. W. Francis, W. Zareba, L. F. M. Watelet, I. Sanz, f. t. T. Factors, and R. C. E. Investigators Anticardiolipin Antibodies and Recurrent Coronary Events : A Prospective Study of 1150 Patients Circulation, September 12, 2000; 102(11): 1258 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |