| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1995;91:2882-2890.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the St Louis (Mo) University Health Sciences Center (F.V.A., T.J.D.); Cleveland Clinic (Ohio) (E.J.T.); Texas Heart Institute, Houston (J.J.F.); Centocor, Inc, Malvern, Pa (K.A., H.F.W.); Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa (J.C.B.); Arizona Heart Institute and Foundation, Phoenix (R.R.H.); Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (K.S., R.M.C.); Deborah Heart Center, Brown Mill, NJ (M.T.); Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (R.G.); North Memorial Medical Center, Robbinsdale, Minn (G.H.); and Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill (M.R.).
Correspondence to Frank V. Aguirre, MD, Division of Cardiology, St Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Ave at Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Patients with high-risk clinical or lesion morphological characteristics were randomized to receive placebo bolus plus placebo infusion, c7E3 Fab bolus plus placebo infusion, or c7E3 Fab bolus plus c7E3 Fab infusion. Patients received periprocedural aspirin and intravenous heparin continued for a minimum of 12 hours after the procedure. Outcomes reflecting bleeding complications were measured: transfusions, decreased hemoglobin, and an index including both parameters. Major bleeding complications unrelated to bypass surgery occurred in 3.3%, 8.6%, and 10.6%, and blood product transfusions were used in 7.5%, 14.0%, and 16.8% of patients treated with placebo, bolus c7E3 Fab, and bolus plus infusion c7E3 Fab, respectively (both P<.001). Most major bleeding complications occurred at the femoral access site, regardless of treatment. Intracranial hemorrhage (0.3%) and death (0.09%) attributable to major bleeding complications were rare. Multivariable regression analyses identified several variables significantly and independently related to major bleeding complications or greater blood loss, including greater age, female sex, lower weight, c7E3 Fab therapy, and duration and complexity of the index procedure. Major bleeding complications and blood loss in patients receiving bolus plus infusion were not significantly greater than in those receiving bolus alone (P=.38 and P=.14, respectively).
Conclusions Bleeding complications unrelated to bypass surgery were two to three times more frequent in patients receiving c7E3 Fab than in those receiving placebo, but most were transient and well tolerated. Risk-factor analysis and modification of concomitant antithrombotic and antiplatelet treatment strategies may aid in reducing bleeding complications and enhancing clinical benefit in patients receiving c7E3 Fab during percutaneous coronary revascularization.
Key Words: angioplasty platelet aggregation inhibitors clinical trials catheterization
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Defining the bleeding risk in PTCR patients, especially those in high-risk subgroups, is clinically important, since the usefulness of newer antithrombin and antiplatelet agents ultimately depends on the demonstration of clinical benefit that overrides any significant increase in risk (ie, bleeding complications). In the Evaluation of c7E3 Fab in Preventing Ischemic Complications of High-Risk Angioplasty (EPIC) trial, the use of a monoclonal chimeric antibody Fab fragment to the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa platelet receptor (c7E3 Fab), in combination with standard dosing regimens of intravenous heparin and aspirin, was shown to reduce 30-day post-PTCR ischemic events and to limit 6-month clinical restenosis rates in high-risk PTCR patients compared with standard therapy of heparin and aspirin alone.10 11 Accordingly, the purpose of the present analysis is to define the frequency of hemorrhagic complications and identify clinical and treatment variables associated with a high risk of bleeding complications among these patients.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12 hours' duration undergoing direct or
rescue PTCR, with medically refractory unstable or postinfarct angina
associated with ECG changes, or with high-risk clinical and
angiographic characteristics defined by a modification12
of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
criteria,13 alone or in combination with high-risk
clinical features such as female sex, diabetes, or age
65 years. Patients were ineligible for study participation if they had risk factors for bleeding complications. Patients were enrolled in 56 centers in the United States between November 1991 and November 1992. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before study enrollment.
Treatment Protocol
Patients received aspirin (325 mg)
beginning
2 hours before
PTCR and continuing daily after the procedure. Intravenous (IV) heparin
was initiated before PTCR with a bolus of 10 000 to 12 000 U.
Subsequent bolus doses (
3000 U) were given every 15 minutes during
the procedure (total dose,
20 000 U) to achieve an activated
clotting time of 300 to 350 seconds. Continuous IV heparin (1000 U/h)
was administered for at least 12 hours after PTCR to maintain an
activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 60 seconds or at least
twice the baseline value. Further IV heparin therapy was left to the
discretion of the individual investigator. Protocol aPTTs were obtained
at baseline, at 12 and 36 hours after initiation of therapy, and at
discharge.
Randomization and Interventional Procedure
Patients were
randomly assigned to one of three treatment
groups: placebo bolus plus placebo infusion, c7E3 Fab bolus (0.25
mg/kg) with placebo infusion, or c7E3 Fab bolus (0.25 mg/kg) with a
continuous infusion of c7E3 Fab (10 µg/min). The bolus was given
within 10 to 60 minutes before the procedure and the infusion for 12
hours unless clinically contraindicated. Chimeric c7E3 Fab is a Fab
fragment of a human/mouse hybrid of a murine immunoglobulin molecule
that selectively binds to the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor (Centocor,
Inc).
After PTCR, femoral vascular access sheaths remained in place for at least 6 hours after discontinuation of the study drug infusion and at least 4 hours after discontinuation of the heparin infusion. Sheaths were removed only after an aPTT adequate to achieve hemostasis was obtained (ie, at the physician's discretion). The use of venous sheaths, need for coronary stent placement or intra-aortic balloon pump insertion, procedural use of thrombolytics, and requirements for emergent or elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) were mandated according to local practice patterns at each clinical site.
Bleeding Complications
Patients were evaluated daily for
overt evidence of clinical
bleeding and for hemoglobin loss via laboratory assessment. The
classification and site(s) of clinical bleeding were recorded at each
site and confirmed by an independent, blinded event committee. Protocol
platelet counts were obtained at baseline, at 30 minutes and at 2, 12,
and 24 hours after initiation of therapy, then daily until hospital
discharge. Protocol hemoglobin and hematocrit concentrations were
obtained at baseline, at 12 and 36 hours after the start of infusion,
and at hospital discharge.
Bleeding complications were categorized as
major or minor according to
the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) study group
criteria.14 A major bleeding complication was defined as
intracranial hemorrhage, recorded as a new neurological deficit with
computerized axial tomographic evidence of blood density; a drop in
hemoglobin of >5 g/dL from baseline; or (in the absence of a
hemoglobin measurement) a hematocrit decrease of
15% from baseline.
Major bleeding complications were defined as occurring either
spontaneously in a major organ (eg, intracerebral, gastrointestinal, or
genitourinary) or nonspontaneously (eg, provoked by vascular puncture
catheters or gastrointestinal tubes, or involvement of a nonmajor organ
site).
A minor bleeding complication was defined as (1) spontaneous and
observed hematuria or hematemesis, (2) observed blood loss associated
with a decrease in hemoglobin of >3 g/dL (hematocrit change,
10%),
or (3) a decrease in hemoglobin of
4 g/dL (hematocrit drop,
12%)
in the absence of clinical bleeding. All bleeding complications were
designated according to time of occurrence into two time intervals:
36 hours or >36 hours after study drug infusion.
An estimate of net blood loss was calculated with a modification of the criteria established by Landefeld et al,15 by addition of the number of units of packed red blood cells transfused to the baseline-minus-nadir hemoglobin (ie, units transfused plus change in hemoglobin). The study protocol did not include an algorithm for blood product transfusions. All transfusions were prescribed according to the local standard of care at each clinical site.
Statistical Analyses
Continuous demographic and hematologic
variables were
represented by the median and 25th and 75th percentiles.
Comparisons of continuous outcomes were made with nonparametric methods
using normal scores; tests for differences among treatment groups were
performed with a test for trend from placebo to bolus to bolus plus
infusion. Categorical data were described as percentages; pairwise
comparisons between treatment groups were made with Fisher's exact
test. Tests for differences among all three treatment groups were made
with a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
2 test for trends
from placebo to bolus to bolus plus infusion. One-sided confidence
bounds for hemorrhagic stroke rates were computed with exact binomial
probabilities. Multivariable logistic modeling was applied to examine
the relations of major bleeding events to clinical baseline
characteristics and to other procedural outcomes. Linear regression
modeling was used to test for associations between estimated blood loss
and baseline characteristics and between blood loss and procedural
outcomes. Statistical testing and variable selection (but not
estimation) for the linear regression modeling were performed with a
nonparametric technique; the estimated blood loss was replaced with
normal scores for this analysis. A stepwise procedure that allowed
treatment interaction between covariables and treatment was used for
both logistic and linear regression modeling. A value of
=.05 was
required to enter a variable into a model, except for treatment
assignment, which was included in all models. Estimation was performed
with least-squares analysis. All analyses were performed with
SAS software.16 A list of candidate
variables is provided in the "Appendix."
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Percutaneous coronary revascularization was successfully achieved in >90% of the procedures attempted. The median time spent in the cardiac catheterization laboratory was similar among the three treatment groups. The median total procedural heparin dose was higher in the placebo-treated patients than in the two c7E3-treated groups (P=.001). The proportions of patients who received intravenous heparin beyond 12 hours after the index PTCR were 94%, 88%, and 83% in the placebo, bolus alone, and bolus-plus-infusion groups, respectively (P<.001).
Coagulation and Hematologic Parameters
The median maximum
decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit were 1.8
g/dL and 5.4% in the placebo group, 2.2 g/dL and 6.5% in the bolus
group, and 2.3 g/dL and 7.0% in the bolus-plus-infusion group,
respectively (P<.001; Table 2
).
|
The maximum
percent decrements in platelet count occurring
24 hours
after study drug infusion were similar in each treatment group. Nadir
platelet counts of <100 000 cells/µL and <50 000 cells/µL
observed throughout hospitalization tended to occur more often in
patients in the bolus-plus-infusiontreated group, but this was
statistically insignificant (P=.12). Within the first 24
hours after initiation of study drug infusion, a platelet count
<100 000 cells/µL was observed in 7 (1%), 10 (1.4%), and 18
(2.5%) patients in the placebo, bolus, and bolus-plus-infusion groups,
respectively (P=.024). Similarly, a greater proportion of
patients receiving the bolus-plus-infusion therapy (1.1%) were
observed to have a platelet count of <50 000 cells/µL compared with
placebo-treated (0.1%) or bolus-treated (0.01%) patients within the
first 24 hours after study drug initiation (P=.007).
Bleeding Complications
Major bleeding complications were
categorically identified in 222
patients (10.6%): 46 (6.6%), 77 (11.1%), and 99 (14%) in the
placebo, bolus, and bolus-plus-infusion groups, respectively
(P<.001; Figure
). Among patients undergoing
CABG, the incidence of major bleeding (P=.81) and estimated
units of blood loss (P=.62) were similar among treatment
groups. The median times to CABG were 0.8, 1.0, and 2.2 days among
patients assigned to the placebo, bolus, and bolus-plus-infusion
treatment groups, respectively. Among patients undergoing CABG
24
hours after study drug infusion, the estimated blood loss was 6.9, 7.3,
and 8.5 units in the placebo, bolus, and bolus-plus-infusion groups,
respectively.
|
Among the 158 patients with major bleeding events not
related to CABG,
major bleeding complications were higher in the bolus-plus-infusion
group (10.6%) than in the placebo group (3.3%) and were intermediate
in the bolus-treated patients (8.6%, Figure
). The majority
(66.5%) of
nonCABG-related major bleeding complications occurred
36 hours from
treatment onset (52% placebo, 63% bolus, and 73% bolus-plus-infusion
events).
Spontaneous major organ bleeding complications and
nonspontaneous
bleeding events occurred in 28 (1.3%) and 130 (6.2%) of the patients,
respectively, and were significantly more common in patients treated
with bolus plus infusion than with placebo (P=.002 and
P<.001, respectively, Table 3
).
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage was the most common type of spontaneous
major organ bleeding event and was represented as
hematemesis in the majority of cases. The femoral vascular access site
was the most frequent site of major bleeding events overall; it was
denoted as a bleeding site in 71% (92/130) of the patients who had
nonspontaneous hemorrhagic complications. Strokes occurred in 14
patients (0.7%), of which 6 (42.9%) were hemorrhagic. There was no
difference in the occurrence of hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic strokes
among the treatment groups (Table 3
). The 95% upper one-sided
confidence bounds for hemorrhagic stroke rates were 0.9%, 0.7%, and
1.1% for the placebo, c7E3 Fab bolus, and c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusion
groups, respectively. Two deaths (0.09%) were attributable to major
bleeding from hemorrhagic stroke: one in the placebo group and one in
the bolus-plus-infusion group. One additional patient randomized to the
bolus-plus-infusion treatment who was not treated with study drug also
died of a hemorrhagic stroke.
|
Minor bleeding complications not
associated with bypass surgery
occurred in 291 patients (13.9%) and were more frequent among c7E3
Fabtreated patients (P<.001, Figure
). Access
site
complications accounted for 78% of the total minor bleeding events
(placebo, 64.1%; bolus, 83.3%; bolus-plus-infusion, 80.7%).
Estimated blood loss for patients with a minor bleeding complication
was 3.8, 3.7, and 3.8 units in the placebo, bolus, and
bolus-plus-infusion treatment groups, respectively.
Consequences of Major Bleeding Complications
Among patients
experiencing major bleeding complications not
associated with CABG, the median maximum decrease in hemoglobin
(placebo, 6.2 g/dL; bolus, 5.7 g/dL; bolus-plus-infusion, 6.0 g/dL) was
similar among the three treatment groups (P=.42). However,
blood product transfusions were administered to a greater proportion of
c7E3 Fabtreated than placebo-treated patients (placebo, 7.5%; bolus,
14.0%; bolus-plus-infusion, 16.8%; P<.001; Table
3
).
Packed red blood cells and whole-blood transfusions were administered
to 70.3% of all patients with major bleeding complications and to
similar percentages of patients in the placebo (60.9%), bolus
(70.0%), and bolus-plus-infusion (73.3%) groups (P=.28).
The proportion of patients with a major bleeding complication who
received >5 units of packed red blood cells was also similar among the
three groups (P=.79).
The incidence of dose reduction or discontinuation of study drug related to major nonbypass-related bleeding was low in all groups. There were 21 such patients (3.1%) in the bolus-plus-infusion group, compared with 17 (2.5%) in the bolus group and 2 (0.3%) in the placebo group (P<.001). Surgical intervention was required for a major bleeding complication not related to bypass surgery in 6 placebo patients (26.1% of patients in this group with a major bleeding complication), 12 bolus patients (20.0%), and 5 bolus-plus-infusion patients (6.7%) (P=.007), the majority (17/23, 74%) for femoral vascular repair.
Hospitalization was longer among patients who had a major bleeding complication (median, 7.0 days) than among those without a major bleeding event (median, 3.0 days). However, the length of hospitalization was similar among patients with a major bleeding event, regardless of treatment received (placebo, 7.0 days; bolus, 6.0 days; bolus-plus-infusion, 7.0 days; P=.85).
The incidence of bleeding complications among the first (8.9%), second (6.4%), and third (7.3%) chronological tertiles of patient enrollment was similar.
Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Bleeding
Complications
Table 4
shows the results of
multivariable logistic
regression modeling defining relations of clinical and procedural
variables to the occurrence of a major bleeding complication. Age was
associated with a major bleeding complication only among patients who
received c7E3 Fab, as indicated by the interaction term between age and
c7E3 Fab bolus therapy. This interaction term indicates that older
patients in the c7E3 Fabtreated groups had a significantly higher
rate of major bleeding complications than their placebo-treated
counterparts. Other covariables indicating an increased risk of a major
bleeding complication included lower weight and presenting with an
acute myocardial infarction. The lack of an interaction between weight
and trial treatment suggests an increased risk of bleeding
complications in low-weight patients regardless of treatment received
(Table 4
). The odds ratio and P value for c7E3 Fab
infusion
suggest little difference in the rates of major bleeding complications
between the bolus and bolus-plus-infusion groups. After procedural
covariables were entered into the model, additional variables
associated with higher rates of a major bleeding event included longer
PTCR duration, repeat PTCR, and unsuccessful or unattempted coronary
revascularization procedures (Table 4
).
|
Table
5
shows the results of the multivariable
linear regression model defining the relations of clinical and
procedural variables to the maximum drop in hemoglobin (ie, blood loss
index). The estimated coefficients represent an indication of
the degree of blood loss associated with individual variables (eg, the
coefficient -1.11 for acute myocardial infarction indicates an
expected 1.11 g/dL greater hemoglobin drop for patients who have this
characteristic than for others). No interaction terms were included in
the final blood loss index model, suggesting that all risk factors for
blood loss were independent of treatment received. Variables associated
with an increased amount of blood loss included greater age, female
sex, lower weight, higher diastolic blood pressure, higher baseline
platelet count, enrollment with acute myocardial infarction or type C
lesion morphology, and treatment with c7E3 Fab. Types A and B1 lesions
were associated with less blood loss (Table 5
). The incremental
amount of blood loss associated with the addition of c7E3 Fab infusion
to bolus therapy was not statistically significant (P=.428).
The addition of procedural variables to the regression model indicated
an increased risk of blood loss associated with the same clinical
variables but also with longer procedures, intra-aortic balloon
pumping, stent use, and CABG, whereas PTCR success was associated with
less blood loss (Table 5
).
|
Table 6
lists
the odds ratios and 95%
confidence intervals for major bleeding complications among patient
subgroups. Major bleeding events were more common in women and in older
and lower-weight patients. The incremental risk of a major bleeding
event among c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusiontreated patients was
particularly high among women (16.8% versus 4.2%), those who weighed
75 kg (17.8% versus 4.1%), and those who received higher procedural
heparin doses per kilogram body weight (11.8% versus 3.3%) compared
with the placebo-treated group.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the EPIC trial, a major bleeding complication (not related to bypass surgery) occurred in 7.5% of the total study population. Bleeding complications and estimated units of blood loss were higher in the bolus-plus-infusion c7E3 Fabtreated patients than in the placebo-treated group. However, the majority of hemorrhagic events were transient and clinically well tolerated and did not require surgical intervention. Spontaneous major organ bleeding occurred rarely (1.3%) but was most frequent in the c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusion group (2.4%). Spontaneous hematemesis and gross hematuria accounted for the majority of spontaneous major organ hemorrhagic events. The vascular access site was the most common source of major bleeding events overall, occurring in >70% of those experiencing a major bleeding complication in each treatment group. Although the femoral puncture site accounted for the majority of vascular access complications, 16 patients (0.8%) had retroperitoneal hematomas, 12 of whom received bolus-plus-infusion therapy (1.7% of the treatment group).
Stroke occurred in 0.7% of the patients and intracranial hemorrhage in 0.3%, irrespective of treatment assignment. Although the study did not have adequate power to rule out very small differences in risks of hemorrhagic stroke, large differences can be excluded by this study, and the observed results are most consistent with no additional risk from c7E3 Fab therapy. The high-risk characteristics of this population and the careful follow-up evaluations may explain these high rates; conversely, patients with a known history of stroke were excluded. Efforts to reduce these rates will be important in future refinements of percutaneous revascularization procedures and adjunctive therapies.
Blood product transfusions were used in 12.8% of the patients but varied considerably among the treatment groups. The rate of 7.5% among patients receiving placebo is similar to the 6.6% rate among angioplasty patients recently reported.17 The blood product transfusion rate was approximately twofold higher (14% for bolus; 16.8% for bolus plus infusion) with c7E3 Fab therapy than with placebo. Although transfusion rates were higher in the c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusion group than in placebo-treated patients, the extent of hematologic derangement and estimated units of blood loss in patients experiencing a major bleeding event was similar in each treatment group. Differences in procedural techniques (eg, vascular access sheath insertion and removal), dosing of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy, complexity of the PTCR procedure, and lack of a specific transfusion protocol may have contributed to the high incidence of major bleeding complications and variable rates of blood product transfusions in the c7E3 Fabtreated patients.
Sparse
data are available on estimates of blood loss during PTCR. In
two small studies, the absolute decreases from baseline in 12- to
24-hour hematocrit concentrations averaged from 3.8% to 6.0%; this
represented a relative decrease of 11% to 15% from the
baseline concentration.20 21 In the EPIC trial, the
median
maximum decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration occurring
36 hours after study drug infusion were 1.8 g/dL and 5.4% in
placebo-treated and 2.3 g/dL and 7.0% in bolus-plus-infusion c7E3
Fabtreated patients, respectively. These findings appear comparable
to previous studies, despite a higher bleeding risk profile among EPIC
patients (Table 1
).
Treatment and Procedural Variables Associated With Increased
Bleeding Complications
The regression modeling strategy was designed
to provide insight
into the predicted likelihood of bleeding that could be estimated
before the procedure by excluding procedural variables from the initial
model. The procedural outcome characteristics were then added to
provide an estimate of the effect of conducting the procedure on
eventual bleeding outcome. Two measures of bleeding outcome were
modeled, since major bleeding, although a discrete and important end
point, is not a sensitive measure of blood loss. Indeed, many more
factors related to increased risk of blood loss were detected with the
models evaluating the adjusted hemoglobin drop. Since no single measure
of bleeding outcomes is completely satisfactory, we have found that
evaluating several measures provides a worthwhile perspective.
The
regression models identified a group of demographic and clinical
characteristics that can be used to stratify bleeding risk before a
procedure is performed. Based on regression model coefficients, an
estimated probability of a major bleeding event can be calculated,
given the age and weight of an individual patient, with and without
c7E3 Fab therapy. {Complications is derived from estimated
coefficients of regression model (Table 4
) as
a=-1.4199-0.7470+
0.1633+(0.286xage/10)-(0.245xweight/10) for patients
with acute
myocardial infarction receiving c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusion therapy.
For placebo patients not enrolled with acute MI,
a=-1.4199-(0.245xweight/10). The probability of an
event is
exp(a)/[1+exp(a)]. Age is in years, weight in kilograms.}
Thus, a
50-year-old patient weighing 90 kg would have a 6% predicted
probability of a major bleeding event with c7E3 Fab therapy and a 3%
chance without this therapy. In contrast, a 70-year-old patient
weighing 70 kg would have an 18% chance of major bleeding with c7E3
Fab and a 4% chance without treatment.
The blood loss index allowed development of a more sensitive index for identifying variables associated with blood loss. Variables associated with the greatest amount of blood loss (>0.5 g/dL drop in hemoglobin) included presentation with acute myocardial infarction (1.04 g/dL decrease), a 35-kg difference in weight (eg, 0.53 g/dL decrease for a 65-kg patient versus a 100-kg patient), greater age, and the presence of complex lesion morphology. Other factors entered into the model were associated with an average drop in hemoglobin of <0.5 g/dL. Blood loss can be expected to increase incrementally and independently with each additional risk factor, regardless of whether c7E3 Fab is given. These same risk factors have been identified in previous studies,17 22 23 24 25 26 although the detail provided by this prospective study has not previously been available.
As expected, both the blood loss index and the major bleeding model identified complicated procedures as increasing the risk for transfusion. In the blood loss index model, a procedure duration lasting 100 minutes longer was associated with an average additional hemoglobin decrease of 0.6 g/dL, bypass surgery with a 4.5-g/dL decrease, and stent use with a drop of 1.3 g/dL.
The profound platelet
inhibition with c7E3 Fab, when combined with the
effects of standard doses of heparin and aspirin, collectively
represents a major challenge to hemostatic function,
predisposing the patient to PTCR-related hemorrhagic complications. In
previous studies, the increasing complexity of PTCR procedures, patient
comorbidity, acuteness of patient illness, and concomitant
pharmacological therapies (eg, aspirin, intravenous heparin, and
fibrinolytic therapy) have been identified as important variables
contributing to PTCR-related vascular access site and hemorrhagic
complications.17 22 23 24 25 26
Within each clinical subgroup,
there was an incrementally higher frequency of major bleeding events
with the addition of c7E3 Fab bolus and c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusion
therapy. For example, the frequency of a major bleeding complication
among patients weighing
75 kg who received placebo therapy was 4.1%
but was approximately threefold higher among patients receiving c7E3
Fabbolus therapy (10.4%) and fivefold higher (17.8%) when receiving
c7E3 Fab bolus-plus-infusion therapy. Similarly, a threefold to
fourfold higher frequency of major bleeding complications was observed
among those receiving c7E3 Fab bolus and bolus-plus-infusion therapy
with higher procedural doses of heparin (
120 U/kg, Table 6
)
than
among placebo-treated patients.
The incrementally higher rates of major
bleeding complications and
blood loss seen in the bolus-plus-infusion group compared with the
bolus-only group were neither statistically (Tables 4
and
5
) nor
clinically (Tables 2
and 3
) significant. These
observations are
important clinically, since the most consistent benefit of c7E3 Fab
therapy in high-risk PTCR patients was demonstrable only among those
receiving the bolus-plus-infusion regimen.10 11 The
early
intensity of GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade achieved with either bolus
or bolus-plus-infusion dosing of c7E3 Fab27 most likely
explains the similar rates of bleeding complications in the two c7E3
Fab regimens.
Conclusions
In the EPIC trial, patients undergoing
angioplasty who received
adjunctive c7E3 Fab therapy with standard doses of periprocedural
aspirin and intravenous heparin had a twofold to threefold higher
frequency of major bleeding complications and blood product
transfusions than those who received aspirin and heparin alone. Major
bleeding complications in the EPIC trial were usually transient and
well tolerated. Although major bleeding events were largely
attributable to vascular access site complications, they resulted in
morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and increased blood product
transfusion regardless of treatment assignment. The sustained GP
IIb/IIIa blockade achieved with bolus-plus-infusion c7E3 Fab dosing was
not associated with a significant excess of major bleeding
complications compared with bolus dosing alone. Major bleeding
complications and greater amounts of blood loss occurred more
frequently among women, older and lower-weight patients, and those who
had complicated or prolonged PTCR. The significant reduction of
postprocedural ischemic events observed with c7E3 Fab
bolus-plus-infusion therapy strongly warrants consideration of its use
among patient subgroups at high risk for post-PTCR ischemic
complications. However, clinical risk factors for bleeding
complications as described in this report should also be considered in
deciding whether to treat a patient with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Ongoing studies of these agents include several efforts to reduce
bleeding: reduced heparin dosing, transfusion protocols, premedication
with H2 antagonists, and groin care management
guidelines.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 A list of EPIC investigators and centers was published in
N Engl J Med. 1994;330:956-961. ![]()
Candidate Variables for Regression Models
The
candidate variables for regression models are given in Table 7
.
Received August 25, 1994; revision received December 19, 1994; accepted December 27, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ali, M. Hashem, H. S. Rosman, L. Moser, A. Rehan, T. Davis, M. Romanelli, T. LaLonde, H. Yamasaki, B. Barbish, et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonists and Risk of Bleeding: A Single-Center Experience in 1020 Patients J. Clin. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 44(11): 1328 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J.G. Peters, S. R. Mehta, K. A.A. Fox, F. Zhao, B. S. Lewis, S. L. Kopecky, R. Diaz, P. J. Commerford, V. Valentin, S. Yusuf, et al. Effects of Aspirin Dose When Used Alone or in Combination With Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Observations From the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) Study Circulation, October 7, 2003; 108(14): 1682 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Willerson Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiologic Interventional Devices Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 561 - 580. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Chun, B. A. Orser, and M. Madan Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors: Overview and Implications for the Anesthesiologist Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 879 - 888. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Y Lee, W. DeBois, K. H Krieger, L. N Girardi, L. Russo, J. McVey, W. Ko, N. K Altorki, R. A Brodman, and O W. Isom The effects of platelet inhibitors on blood use in cardiac surgery Perfusion, January 1, 2002; 17(1): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Anderson, J. McNatt, F. J. Clubb, M. Herman, J.-P. Maffrand, F. DeClerck, C. Ahn, L. M. Buja, and J. T. Willerson Platelet Inhibition Reduces Cyclic Flow Variations and Neointimal Proliferation in Normal and Hypercholesterolemic-Atherosclerotic Canine Coronary Arteries Circulation, November 6, 2001; 104(19): 2331 - 2337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Despotis, M. S. Avidan, and C. W. Hogue Jr Mechanisms and attenuation of hemostatic activation during extracorporeal circulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): S1821 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Roberts and N. R. Bocanegra Emergent operation for percutaneous coronary rupture after abciximab administration Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 71(6): 2024 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Chew and D. J. Moliterno A critical appraisal of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2028 - 2035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Lincoff, L. A. LeNarz, G. J. Despotis, P. K. Smith, J. E. Booth, R. E. Raymond, S. K. Sapp, C. F. Cabot, J. E. Tcheng, R. M. Califf, et al. Abciximab and bleeding during coronary surgery: results from the EPILOG and EPISTENT trials Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 516 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Silvestry and P. K. Smith Current status of cardiac surgery in the abciximab-treated patient Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): S12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lemmer Jr Clinical experience in coronary bypass surgery for abciximab-treated patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): S33 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cauwenberghs, M. Meiring, S. Vauterin, V. van Wyk, S. Lamprecht, J. P. Roodt, L. Novak, J. Harsfalvi, H. Deckmyn, and H. F. Kotze Antithrombotic Effect of Platelet Glycoprotein Ib-Blocking Monoclonal Antibody Fab Fragments in Nonhuman Primates Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2000; 20(5): 1347 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Weiss, M. L. Mirsky, O. A. Evanson, J. Fagliari, D. Mcclenahan, and B. Mccullough Platelet Kinetics in Dogs Treated with a Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Peptide Antagonist Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 2000; 28(2): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lemmer Jr, M. T. Metzdorff, A. H. Krause Jr, M. A. Martin, J. E. Okies, and J. G. Hill Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery in abciximab-treated patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 69(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|