Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:2916-2923

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vassalli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vassalli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O. M.

(Circulation. 1995;91:2916-2923.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Reduced Epicardial Coronary Vasodilator Capacity in Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Giuseppe Vassalli, MD; Philipp Kaufmann, MD; Bruno Villari, MD; Markus Jakob, MD; Hildegard Boj, RN; Wolfgang Kiowski, MD; Otto M. Hess, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Otto M. Hess, MD, Cardiology, University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Enlargement of the epicardial coronary arteries occurs in left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy as an adaptation to the increased coronary blood flow.

Methods and Results Vasodilator capacity of the epicardial coronary arteries was determined in 44 patients. The dose-response relation of intracoronary nitroglycerin was assessed in 14 patients (7 control subjects and 7 patients with aortic stenosis [study A]) using quantitative coronary angiography. In a second study (B), vasodilator capacity of the epicardial coronary arteries was determined in 15 control subjects and 15 patients with valvular heart disease. In study A, a curvilinear dose-response relation with maximal vasodilation after 90 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin was found in both control subjects and patients with aortic stenosis. Vasodilator capacity was reduced in those with aortic stenosis, although sensitivity to nitroglycerin was similar in both groups. In study B, coronary circumferential length at baseline was larger in those with LV hypertrophy (12.2±2.2 mm) than in control subjects (8.6±1.5 mm; P<.001); after 100 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin, it increased to 12.9±2.2 mm (6±5%) in those with LV hypertrophy and to 10.3±1.5 mm (21±8%; P<.001) in control subjects. An inverse relation between baseline circumferential length and its percent increase after nitroglycerin was found (r=-.71, P<.001).

Conclusions Vasodilator capacity of the epicardial coronary arteries is reduced in patients with LV hypertrophy, although sensitivity to nitroglycerin is normal. This may be due to a flow-mediated decrease in coronary vasomotor tone and/or the occurrence of vascular remodeling with an enlargement of the coronary arteries.


Key Words: vasodilation • hypertrophy • nitroglycerin • stenosis • ventricles


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Normal as well as stenotic coronary arteries have been shown to change their size with different pharmacological interventions and physiological stress.1 2 Changes in blood flow and arterial diameter are closely correlated, ie, an increase in flow is accompanied by an increase in vascular diameter, and vice versa.3 4 An enlargement of the coronary arteries has been reported in patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy due to valvular heart disease,5 6 7 hypertension,8 and cardiomyopathy.9 The purpose of the present study was to assess epicardial coronary artery size at rest and after nitroglycerin administration and to determine the vasodilator capacity of the large coronary arteries in patients with LV hypertrophy.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Forty-four patients with normal coronary arteries were included in the present analysis. In a dose-response study (study A), 14 patients were examined with increasing doses of intracoronary nitroglycerin. Seven patients (age, 63±9 years) had severe aortic stenosis, and 7 healthy subjects (age, 54±8 years), who were examined because of atypical chest pain, served as the control group.

In a second study (study B), 30 patients were examined with a maximal vasodilating dose of 100 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin. Fifteen patients (age, 63±13 years) had LV hypertrophy secondary to valvular heart disease: 9 of them had aortic stenosis, 3 had aortic regurgitation, and 3 had severe mitral regurgitation. Fifteen patients (age, 48±6 years) with atypical chest pain served as control subjects. Mean body surface area was similar in patients with LV hypertrophy (1.81±0.28 m2) and control subjects (1.85±0.32 m2). Coronary arteriography was performed in all patients for diagnostic purposes. Patients with LV hypertrophy were selected for the study when the following inclusion criteria were fulfilled: severe valve lesion (preoperative evaluation), normal coronary arteries, and adequate opacification of the coronary arteries for quantitative evaluation.

Cardiac Catheterization
Informed consent to undergo cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography was obtained from all patients. Premedication consisted of 10 mg oral chlordiazepoxide administered 1 hour before catheterization. Vasoactive substances were withheld for at least 24 hours before catheterization. LV and aortic pressures were measured with an 8F pigtail catheter introduced retrogradely from the right femoral artery in patients with aortic and mitral regurgitation and in control subjects. In patients with aortic stenosis, transeptal catheterization was carried out, and systolic pressure gradient was calculated from simultaneous LV and aortic pressure measurements. LV angiograms were recorded simultaneously in the right and left anterior oblique projections at a filming rate of 50 frames per second.10 LV volume and ejection fraction were calculated using the "area–length" method.11 Aortic and mitral regurgitation fraction was determined from LV angiography and cardiac output (Fick). LV muscle mass was obtained according to the method of Rackley et al.12 Selective left coronary arteriography was carried out from the right femoral artery (Judkins technique, 8F catheters) using multiple views for optimal visualization of the coronary arteries.

In study A, the dose-response relation of intracoronary nitroglycerin was determined from biplane coronary arteriograms in the right and left anterior oblique projections. First, a control run was performed; then, 10, 30, 90, and 150 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin were administered with an interval of 5 minutes between the different steps. Heart rate and mean aortic pressure were recorded before and after each injection.

In study B, a maximal vasodilating dose of 100 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin was administered, and coronary angiography was repeated immediately after injection.

Quantitative Coronary Arteriography
Quantitative evaluation of the coronary angiograms was performed with a semiautomatic computer system.13 14 The system is based on a 35-mm film projector (Tagarno 35 CX), a slow-scan CCD camera (image digitization) that has been developed at the Institute for Biomedical Engineering in Zurich, and a computer work station (Apollo DN 3000) for image storage and processing. Contour detection was carried out using a geometric-densitometric edge-detection algorithm (Fig 1Down). The methodology for computerized analysis of coronary angiograms has been described previously.15 16



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Coronary angiograms (left anterior oblique view) of the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries in a patient with left ventricular hypertrophy under baseline conditions (left) and after administration of 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerin (NTG; right). Cross-sectional areas of the LAD and the LCX increased from 17.5 to 18.2 mm2 and from 18.2 to 19.3 mm2, respectively, after NTG administration.

The proximal cross-sectional area of the left anterior descending and the left circumflex coronary arteries, defined as the vessel segments immediately beyond the bifurcation of the left main coronary artery over the length of approximately 1 cm, was measured using one to three end-diastolic cine-frames. The computer traced these segments automatically and calculated their mean cross-sectional area (Fig 1Up). Calibration was performed automatically using either the isocenter technique13 or the tip of the 8F Judkins catheter. Vasodilator capacity was defined as circumferential length after nitroglycerin minus circumferential length at rest divided by resting length multiplied by 100.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical comparisons of hemodynamic and angiographic data between control subjects and patients with LV hypertrophy were performed with an unpaired Student's t test, whereas a paired Student's t test was used for comparisons of angiographic data before and after nitroglycerin administration. The analysis of the dose-response relation in the two groups was carried out with a two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements. If the analysis was significant, the Scheffé procedure was applied. An exponential regression analysis between coronary circumferential length at rest and its percent increase after nitroglycerin administration was performed using the least-squares method.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical Data
Patients' characteristics in studies A and B are summarized in Table 1Down. In study A, 1 patient with aortic stenosis was in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I, 3 were in class II, and 3 were in class III. In study B, 2 patients with valvular heart disease were in NYHA functional class I, 8 were in class II, and 5 were in class III. Mean physical working capacity (in percent of the age-, sex-, and height-corrected normal values17 ) was 95±19% in control subjects and 71±14% (P<.01) in patients with LV hypertrophy. Seven of 44 patients (3 control subjects and 4 patients with LV hypertrophy) were receiving long-acting nitrates, and 6 were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors before catheterization. Cardiovascular medication is summarized in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics

Hemodynamic and Ventriculographic Data
In study A, mean systolic pressure gradient was 57±9 mm Hg (range, 44 to 68 mm Hg), and the opening area of the aortic valve was 0.7 cm2 (range, 0.5 to 0.9 cm2) in patients with aortic stenosis. LV muscle mass index was 142±21 g/m2 in these patients and 82±11 g/m2 (P<.01) in control subjects (upper limit of normal, 118 g/m210 ). Heart rate and mean aortic pressure after each dose of intracoronary nitroglycerin in the two groups are shown in Table 2Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Hemodynamic Data in Study A

The hemodynamic data of study B are summarized in Table 3Down. Mean systolic pressure gradient was 61±24 mm Hg in patients with pure or predominant aortic stenosis and 28±21 mm Hg in patients with predominant aortic regurgitation. Aortic regurgitant fraction was 24±14% in patients with predominant aortic stenosis and 59±10% in those with predominant aortic regurgitation. Mitral regurgitant fraction was 67±5% in patients with mitral regurgitation and 21±15% in patients with aortic valve disease. LV muscle mass index was 145±23 g/m2 in patients with LV hypertrophy and 85±12 g/m2 (P<.01) in control subjects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hemodynamic and Angiographic Data in Study B

Dose-Response Relation of Intracoronary Nitroglycerin
Percent increase in coronary artery size was significantly less at each intracoronary nitroglycerin dose in patients with aortic stenosis than in control subjects (Fig 2Down). In both groups, the dose-response relation was curvilinear, leveling off after a dose of 30 µg. Mean increase in coronary circumferential length after 150 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin was 21±4% in control subjects and 10±6% (P<.001) in patients with aortic stenosis. After a dose of 90 µg nitroglycerin, 96% of the respective increase was reached in both groups. The dose-response curve in patients with aortic stenosis appeared to be shifted to the right compared with that of control subjects. Because coronary flow has not been measured in the present study but has been previously shown to increase proportionately with LV mass, LV muscle mass has been used to correct for dilution effects caused by increased flow in LV hypertrophy. After normalization for LV muscle mass, the rightward shift of the dose-response curve was no longer seen.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Top, Dose-response curves of the epicardial coronary arteries with increasing doses of intracoronary nitroglycerin (i.c. NTG [µg]). Bottom, Normalized dose-response curve; the doses of i.c. NTG are normalized for 100 g left ventricular muscle mass (LMM) (i.c. NTG/LMM, x10). {Delta}L indicates increase in coronary circumferential length (%; mean±1 SEM); C, control subjects (n=7); and AS, aortic stenosis (n=7). Rightward shift of the curve in the patients with AS is no longer present after normalization for LMM.

Coronary Artery Size and Vasodilating Capacity
Circumferential length of the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries in the patients of study B is shown in Fig 3Down. At baseline, it was significantly higher in patients with LV hypertrophy (12.2±2.2 mm) compared with control subjects (8.6±1.5 mm; P<.001). After intracoronary nitroglycerin administration, coronary circumference increased to 12.9±2.2 mm in patients with LV hypertrophy and to 10.3±1.5 mm in control subjects (P<.001 versus baseline in both groups). Thus, the percent increase in coronary circumference was significantly less in patients with LV hypertrophy (6±5%) than in control subjects (21±8%; P<.001). Interestingly, coronary artery size after nitroglycerin administration in control subjects was still lower than the baseline values of patients with LV hypertrophy. An exponential relation (r=-.71, P<.001) between coronary circumferential length at baseline and its percent change after nitroglycerin was found in the study population as a whole (Fig 4Down).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plot of proximal circumferential length (L [mm]; mean±1 SD) of the left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries in control subjects (n=30) and patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (n=30) at baseline and after administration of 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerin (NTG).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Correlation between proximal coronary artery circumferential length at rest (LR [mm]) and its percent increase after administration of 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerin ({Delta}L [%]) in control subjects (n=30) and patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (n=30).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The modulation of coronary vascular tone allows the heart to match for changes in metabolic demands by adjusting coronary blood flow. Many studies on chronic LV hypertrophy in experimental animals18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 and in patients with aortic valve disease,26 27 28 29 30 31 hypertension,32 or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy33 have shown that coronary flow per unit mass is normal in the basal state. Parallel to the increase in flow, an increase in coronary artery size has been described in patients with valvular heart disease.5 6 7 The exact mechanism responsible for the growth of the vessels, however, is not known, although increased coronary blood flow has been postulated to be the major growth stimulus. Several other factors might be involved in the enlargement of the coronary arteries, such as perfusion pressure, the endothelium-derived relaxing factor,34 35 36 circulating neurohormones, and local growth factors.36 37 38

Vasodilator Capacity of Epicardial Coronary Arteries in LV Hypertrophy
The major finding of the present study is that the vasodilator capacity of the large coronary arteries is reduced in patients with LV hypertrophy. This concept has not yet been evaluated in humans. Recent data39 40 41 from healthy subjects are comparable to our results showing an increase in coronary circumferential length of 21% (increase in cross-sectional area, 40%) after administration of 100 µg intracoronary nitroglycerin. In patients with coronary artery disease, Brown et al42 found an increase in the cross-sectional area of 18% after administration of 0.4 mg nitroglycerin SL in angiographically normal coronary artery segments.

The present dose-response study showed a reduced dilation of the coronary arteries in response to intracoronary nitroglycerin in patients with aortic stenosis (Fig 2Up). The dose-response curve flattened off after 30 µg nitroglycerin in both the control subjects and the patients with aortic stenosis, indicating that a dose of 100 µg is adequate to induce maximal vasodilation. However, a rightward shift of the dose-response curve was found in patients with aortic stenosis compared with control subjects. This finding suggests either a reduced sensitivity of the smooth muscle to nitroglycerin or a greater dilution of the injected nitroglycerin because of the increased coronary blood flow in patients with aortic stenosis.26 27 28 29 In the present study, arterial blood concentrations of nitroglycerin were not determined since coronary flow measurements were not carried out. However, previously data26 from our group have demonstrated that coronary blood flow is proportional to LV muscle mass in patients with aortic stenosis and, thus, LV muscle mass has been used for normalization purposes (Fig 2Up). The rightward shift of the dose-response curve in the aortic stenosis group was abolished when the nitroglycerin dose was divided by LV muscle mass. This observation suggests a similar sensitivity of the coronary arteries to nitroglycerin in control subjects and in patients with aortic stenosis, although maximum vasodilator response was reduced in LV hypertrophy.

Functional and Structural Factors Determining Epicardial Coronary Vasodilating Capacity
Data from the present study do not allow differentiation between functional and structural factors responsible for the decrease of coronary vasodilator capacity in patients with LV hypertrophy. From a theoretical point of view, the following two mechanisms are possible.

Functional Factors
In the absence of vascular remodeling, each smooth muscle cell is expected to elongate to the same extent in response to nitroglycerin (Fig 5Down). In control subjects, nitroglycerin leads to an increase in coronary circumferential length of 21% (1.7/8.8 mm), whereas the increase is only 6% (0.7/12.2 mm) in patients with LV hypertrophy. Because baseline length was different in the two groups, an increase of 21% in control subjects is equal to an increase of 14% (1.7/12.2 mm) in patients with LV hypertrophy. However, the observed increase is clearly less than this predicted value. Thus, the reduced coronary vasodilator capacity in LV hypertrophy cannot be explained by functional factors alone but suggests the occurrence of vascular remodeling.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the effect of nitroglycerin (NTG) on coronary arterial cross section. One circumferential muscle cell layer is shown at rest and after maximal vasodilation with NTG. Two theoretical possibilities are illustrated. In the absence of vascular remodeling, each muscle cell elongates approximately to the same extent in response to NTG. In the presence of cellular enlargement and hyperplasia, a variable elongation of the individual muscle cells in response to NTG can be expected. {Delta}L indicates change in length; LV, left ventricular; and i.c., intracoronary.

Because coronary flow is increased in LV hypertrophy,18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 flow-mediated vasodilation can be expected as a result of the enhanced release of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor.36 43 44 45 46 47 This release is mediated by the shear stress of the streaming blood48 as well as by local and circulating agonists, such as acetylcholine, bradykinin, and serotonin.43 Therefore, the increased blood flow in LV hypertrophy leads to a "predilation" of the large coronary artery and reduces its functional vasodilator capacity. Predilation of the coronary arteries tends to normalize coronary flow velocity and, thus, shear stress, resulting in a reduced release of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor.

In the present study, however, the maximally dilated coronary arteries in control subjects were not as large as the coronary arteries in patients with LV hypertrophy under baseline conditions (Fig 3Up). This suggests structural enlargement of the coronary arteries in patients with LV hypertrophy and, thus, true vascular remodeling.

Structural Factors
In the presence of vascular remodeling, a variable elongation of the smooth muscle cells occurs in response to nitroglycerin (Fig 5Up). An increase in coronary artery size in hypertrophic hearts has been reported in necropsy studies more than 30 years ago.49 50 51 Further evidence of vascular remodeling has been provided by histological examination of intramyocardial coronary arteries in patients with hypertension52 53 54 or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.52 A parallel increase in LV muscle mass and carotid artery wall thickness has been reported in hypertensive patients.55 Langille and O'Donnell4 observed a 21% decrease in vascular diameter 2 weeks after a 70% reduction in blood flow through the rabbit carotid artery. This effect was believed to be due to vascular remodeling after long-term changes in flow rather than to a sustained contraction of the vascular smooth musculature, since papaverine did not attenuate this response.

Several growth or angiogenic factors, such as platelet- and monocyte-derived growth factors, as well as fibroblast growth factors56 and transforming growth factor-ß136 37 38 possibly promote this vascular remodeling. Shear stress itself enhances the proliferation of coronary smooth muscle cells57 via the release of the platelet-derived growth factor.58 On the other hand, nitric oxide inhibits both mitogenesis and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells59 as well as the production of excessive matrix molecules. Angiotensin II is a bifunctional vascular smooth muscle cell growth modulator capable of inducing hypertrophy or inhibiting mitogen-stimulated DNA synthesis.37

Thus, a complex balance exists between proliferative and antiproliferative stimuli that modulate the growth response of vascular smooth muscle cells to LV hypertrophy. This interplay between functional and structural factors in the adaptation of the arterial wall to long-term hemodynamic changes appears to be important for the reduced coronary vasodilator capacity in patients with LV hypertrophy.

Study Limitations
Coronary blood flow was not measured in the present study and, thus, no conclusion on the effect of blood flow on coronary vasomotion can be made. However, because an increased coronary flow can be assumed in the presence of severe LV hypertrophy,18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 arterial blood concentration of nitroglycerin can be expected to be reduced in these patients. Therefore, data from control subjects and patients with LV hypertrophy are not really comparable with respect to arterial blood concentration of nitroglycerin.

Control subjects and patients with LV hypertrophy were not perfectly matched with respect to medication before catheterization. Although all drugs were discontinued at least 24 hours before the intervention, some residual pharmacological effects cannot be completely ruled out, especially from ß-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. However, only 4 patients were receiving ß-blockers, and 6 were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Because 3 control subjects but only 1 patient with LV hypertrophy was receiving ß-blockers, a potential bias would have caused an underestimation of vasodilator capacity in control subjects but not in patients with LV hypertrophy and, thus, would not have affected our conclusions. Seven of the 44 patients were receiving long-acting nitrates. Although tachyphylaxis to nitrates is possible, it is unlikely to have significantly modified our results, since a drug-free interval of 24 hours was respected and the number of patients receiving nitrates was relatively small; furthermore, the two groups of patients were well balanced in this regard.

Control injections with saline have not been performed in the present study. However, repeated injections of nonionic contrast agents have shown only minor effects on coronary vasomotion with variations in vessel diameter of less than 5% of the control value.60

Because our analysis was not blinded, some observer-dependent bias cannot be ruled out, although the differences in coronary artery size between the two groups were quite large compared with changes observed after other pharmacological interventions.

Factors other than muscle mass may also influence coronary artery size, such as age, sex, body size, and physical working capacity. Variable effects of age on the size of the left coronary artery have been described.61 62 63 In the present study, age was higher in patients with LV hypertrophy than in control subjects, but no correlation was found between age and coronary artery size at baseline (r=.31; P=NS). Body size may also influence coronary artery size. Because body surface area was similar in control subjects and in patients with LV hypertrophy (see Table 1Up), this factor appears to have no influence on the results of the present study.

Physical working capacity may also affect coronary artery size. In fact, a recent study41 reported an increased coronary vasodilator capacity in marathon runners. In study B, a difference in physical working capacity between control subjects (95±19% of the age-, sex-, and height-corrected normal value17 ) and patients with LV hypertrophy (71±14%; P<.05) has been observed; however, this difference can probably not account for the marked decrease in vasodilator capacity in the patients with LV hypertrophy since there was no correlation between these two factors (r=.28, P=NS).

In conclusion, vasodilator capacity of the large coronary arteries is reduced in patients with LV hypertrophy, probably due to a flow-mediated decrease in coronary tone and a structural remodeling of the vascular wall with long-term vessel enlargement.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, Berne, Switzerland. We thank Hetty van Hoeven and the cardiac catheterization team for their excellent technical assistance.

Received October 5, 1994; revision received December 14, 1994; accepted December 27, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. Dynamic mechanisms in human coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1984;70:917-922. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gage JE, Hess OM, Murakami T, Ritter M, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP. Vasoconstriction of stenotic coronary arteries during dynamic exercise in patients with classic angina pectoris: reversibility by nitroglycerin. Circulation. 1986;73:865-876. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lie M, Sejersted OM, Kiil F. Local regulation of vascular cross section during changes in femoral arterial blood flow in dogs. Circ Res. 1970;27:727-737. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Langille BL, O'Donnell F. Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. Science. 1986;231:405-407. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Villari B, Hess OM, Meier Ch, Pucillo A, Gaglione A, Turina M, Krayenbuehl HP. Regression of coronary artery dimensions after successful aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 1992;85:972-978. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Villari B, Hess OM, Moccetti D, Vassalli G, Krayenbühl HP. Effect of progression of left ventricular hypertrophy on coronary artery dimensions in aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1073-1079. [Abstract]
  7. Vassalli G, Hess OM, Krogmann ON, Villari B, Corin WJ, Turina M, Krayenbuehl HP. Coronary artery size in mitral regurgitation and its regression after mitral valve surgery. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1091-1098. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. O'Keefe JH, Owen RM, Bove AA. Influence of left ventricular mass on coronary artery cross-sectional area. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:1395-1397. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kaufmann Ph, Hess OM, Lupi S, Vassalli G, Krayenbühl HP. Coronary artery dimensions in primary and secondary hypertrophy. Eur Heart J. 1993;14(suppl):426. Abstract.
  10. Corin WJ, Monrad ES, Murakami T, Nonogi H, Hess OM, Krayenbuehl HP. The relation of afterload to ejection performance in chronic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1987;76:59-67. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Baxley WA, Hawley RR. Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume. Am J Cardiol. 1966;18:10-24. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rackley CE, Dodge HT, Coble YD, Hay RE. A method for determining left ventricular mass in man. Circulation. 1964;29:666-671. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Buchi M, Hess OM, Kirkeeide RL, Suter T, Muser M, Osenberg HP, Niederer P, Anliker M, Gould KL, Krayenbuehl HP. Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography. Int J Card Imaging. 1990;5:93-103. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Suter TM, Buechi M, Hess OM, Haemmerli-Saner C, Gaglione A, Krayenbuehl HP. Normalization of coronary vasomotion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:86-89. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gould KL, Kelley KO, Bolson EL. Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1982;66:930-937. [Free Full Text]
  16. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT. Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation. 1977;55:329-337. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kipfer PH, Hess OM, Gaglione A, Krayenbuehl HP. Exercise-induced ST-segment depression after successful PTCA: incomplete revascularization or altered coronary vasomotor tone? Coron Artery Dis. 1991;2:595-604.
  18. Su-Fan Q, Brum JM, Bove AA. Energy production, O2 consumption, and blood flow reserve in experimental aortic valve disease. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:243-251.
  19. Gaasch WH, Zile MR, Hoshino PK, Apstein CS, Blaustein AS. Stress-shortening relations and myocardial blood flow in compensated and failing canine hearts with pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 1989;79:872-883. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Thomas DP, Phillips SJ, Bove AA. Myocardial morphology and blood flow distribution in chronic volume-overload hypertrophy in dogs. Basic Res Cardiol. 1984;79:872-883.
  21. Hultgren PB, Bove AA. Myocardial blood flow and mechanics in volume overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs. Cardiovasc Res. 1981;15:522-528. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Badke FR, White M, Le Winter M, Covell J, Andres J, Bloor C. Effects of experimental volume-overload hypertrophy on myocardial blood flow and cardiac function. Am J Physiol. 1981;241(Heart Circ Physiol 10):H564-H570.
  23. Carabello BA, Nakano K, Ishihara K, Kanazawa S, Biedermann RWW, Spann JF Jr. Coronary blood flow in dogs with contractile dysfunction due to experimental volume overload. Circulation. 1991;83:1063-1075. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. O'Keefe DD, Hoffman JIE, Cheitlin R, O'Neill MJ, Allard JR, Shapkin E. Coronary blood flow in experimental canine left ventricular hypertrophy. Circ Res. 1978;43:43-51. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Malik AB, Abe T, O'Kane H, Geha AS. Cardiac function, coronary flow and oxygen consumption in stable left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1973;255:186-191.
  26. Eberli FR, Ritter M, Schwitter J, Bortone A, Hess OM, Krayenbuehl HP. Coronary reserve in patients with aortic valve disease before and after successful aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 1991;12:127-138. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Marcus ML, Doty DB, Hiratzka LF, Wright CB, Eastham CL. Decreased coronary reserve: a mechanism for angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1362-1367. [Abstract]
  28. Rowe GG, Afonso S, Lugo JE, et al. Coronary blood flow and myocardial oxidative metabolism at rest and during exercise in subjects with severe aortic valve disease. Circulation. 1965;32:251-257. [Free Full Text]
  29. Trenouth RS, Phelps NC, Neil WA. Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and oxygen supply in chronic aortic valve disease. Circulation. 1976;53:644-650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Nitenberg A, Foult JM, Antony I, Blanchet F, Rahali M. Coronary flow and resistance reserve in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:478-486. [Abstract]
  31. Kawachi K, Kawashima Y, Kitamura S, Mori T, Hirose H, Nakano S, Oyama C. Coronary sinus blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption after valve replacement for aortic insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42:86-89. [Abstract]
  32. Marcus ML, Müller TM, Gascho JA, Kerber RE. Effects of cardiac hypertrophy secondary to hypertension on the coronary circulation. Am J Cardiol. 1979;44:1023-1028. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Cannon RO III, Rosing DR, Maron BJ, Leon MB, Bonow RO, Watson RM, Epstein S. Myocardial ischemia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: contribution of inadequate vasodilator reserve and elevated left ventricular filling pressures. Circulation. 1985;71:234-243. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pohl U, Holtz J, Busse R, Bassenge E. Crucial role of endothelium in the vasodilator response to increased flow in vivo. Hypertension. 1986;8:37-44. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rubanyi GM, Romero JC, Vanhoutte PM. Flow-induced release of endothelium derived relaxing factor. Am J Physiol. 1986;250:H1145-H1149. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH, Cooke JP, Omoigui N. Vascular biology and medicine in the 1990s: scope, concepts, potentials, and perspectives. Circulation. 1993;87:705-719. [Free Full Text]
  37. Gibbons GH, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy vs hyperplasia: autocrine transforming growth factor–expression determines growth response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:56-461.
  38. Schaper W. Angiogenesis in the adult heart. In: Drexler H, Zeiher AM, Bassenge E, Just H, eds. Endothelial Mechanisms of Vasomotor Control. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1991:51-56.
  39. Vita JA, Treasure CB, Nabel EG, McLenachan JM, Fish RD, Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1990;81:491-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Yasue H, Matsuyuma K, Matsuyuma K, Okumura K, Morikami Y, Ogawa H. Responses of angiographically normal human coronary arteries to intracoronary injection of acetylcholine by age and segment: possible role of early atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1990;81:482-490. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Haskell WL, Sims Ch, Myll J, Bortz WM, St Goar FG, Alderman EL. Coronary artery size and dilating capacity in ultradistance runners. Circulation. 1993;87:1076-1082. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Brown BG, Bolson E, Petersen RB, Pierce CD, Dodge HT. The mechanisms of nitroglycerin action: stenosis vasodilatation as a major component of the drug response. Circulation. 1981;64:1089-1096. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Bassenge E, Heusch G. Endothelial and neuro-humoral control of coronary blood flow in health and disease. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1990;116:77-165. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Cooke JP, Stamler J, Andon N, Davies PF, McKinley G, Loscalzo J. Flow stimulates endothelial cells to release a nitrovasodilator that is potentiated by reduced thiol. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H804-H812. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Vallance P, Collier J, Moncada S. Effects of endothelium-derived nitric oxide on arteriolar tone in man. Lancet.1989;2:989-1000.
  46. Lefroy DC, Crake T, Uren NG, Davies GJ, Maseri A. Effect of nitric oxide synthesis on epicardial coronary artery caliber and coronary blood flow in humans. Circulation. 1993;88:43-54. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Flavahan NA. Atherosclerosis or lipoprotein-induced endothelial dysfunction: potential mechanisms underlying reduction in EDRF/nitric oxide activity. Circulation. 1992;85:1927-1938. [Free Full Text]
  48. Rubanyi GM, Freay AD, Kauser K, Johns A, Harder DR. Mechanoreception by the endothelium: mediators and mechanisms of pressure and flow-induced vascular responses. Blood Vessels. 1990;27:246-257. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Schoenmackers J. Die Herzkranzschlagadern bei der arterio-kardialen Hypertrophie. Z Kardiol. 1949;11/12:321-336.
  50. Linzbach AJ. Heart failure from the point of view of quantitative anatomy. Am J Cardiol. 1960;12:370-382.
  51. Roberts CS, Roberts WC. Cross-sectional area of the proximal portions of the three major epicardial coronary arteries in 98 necropsy patients with different coronary events. Circulation. 1980;62:953-959. [Free Full Text]
  52. Tanaka M, Fujiwara H, Onodera T, Hamashima Y, Kawai C. Quantitative analysis of narrowings of intramyocardial small arteries in normal hearts, hypertensive hearts and hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1987;75:1130-1139. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Schwartzkopff B, Motz W, Frenzel H, Vogt M, Knauer S, Strauer BE. Structural and functional alterations of the intramyocardial coronary arterioles in patients with arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1993;88:993-1003. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Van Hoeven KH, Factor S. Endomyocardial biopsy diagnosis of small vessel disease: a clinicopathological study. Int J Cardiol. 1990;26:103-110. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Roman MJ, Saba PS, Pini R, Spitzer M, Pickering TG, Rosen S, Alderman MH, Devereux RB. Parallel cardiac and vascular adaptation in hypertension. Circulation. 1992;86:1909-1918. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Nabel EG, Yang ZY, Plautz G, Forough R, Zhan X, Haudenschild CC, Maciag T, Nabel GJ. Recombinant fibroblast growth factor-1 promotes intimal hyperplasia and angiogenesis in arteries in vivo. Nature. 1993;362:844-846. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Yang Z, Noll G, Lüscher TF. Calcium antagonists differently inhibit proliferation of human coronary smooth muscle cells in response to pulsatile stretch and platelet-derived growth factor. Circulation. 1993;88:832-836. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Hsieh HJ, Li NQ, Frangos JA. Shear stress increases endothelial platelet-derived growth factor mRNA levels. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H642-H646. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Garg UC, Hassid A. Nitric oxide-generating vasodilators and 8-bromo-cyclic guanosine monophosphate inhibit mitogenesis and proliferation of cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:1774-1777.
  60. Jost S, Raffenbeul W, Gerhardt U, Reil GH, Nellessen U, Hecker H, Lippolt P, Lichtlen PR. Beeinflussen Röntgenkontrastmittel den Koronardurchmesser und damit die quantitative Koronarangiographie? Z Kardiol. 1988;77(suppl 1):52. Abstract.
  61. MacAlpin RN, Abbasi-Abdul S, Grollman JH Jr, Eber L. Human coronary artery size during life: a cinearteriography study. Radiology. 1973;108:567-576. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Leung W-H, Stadius ML, Aldermann EL. Determinants of normal coronary artery dimensions in humans. Circulation. 1991;84:2294-2306. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Dodge JT Jr, Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries: influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. Circulation. 1992;86:232-246. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Sicari, A. Palinkas, E. G. Pasanisi, L. Venneri, and E. Picano
Long-term survival of patients with chest pain syndrome and angiographically normal or near-normal coronary arteries: the additional prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography test (DET)
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2005; 26(20): 2136 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. Saotome, H. Satoh, A. Uehara, H. Katoh, H. Terada, and H. Hayashi
Coronary Ectasia with Slow Flow Related to Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Case report
Angiology, January 1, 2005; 56(1): 103 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Jorg-Ciopor, M. Namdar, J. Turina, R. Jenni, J. Schwitter, M. Turina, O. M. Hess, and P. A. Kaufmann
Regional myocardial ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Impact of myectomy
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2004; 128(2): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D J R Hildick-Smith and L M Shapiro
Echocardiographic differentiation of pathological and physiological left ventricular hypertrophy
Heart, June 1, 2001; 85(6): 615 - 619.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. J. R. Hildick-Smith and L. M. Shapiro
Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1889 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vassalli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vassalli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O. M.