Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:386-392

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirozane, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasayama, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirozane, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasayama, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Transplantation

(Circulation. 1995;91:386-392.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Experimental Graft Coronary Artery Disease in a Murine Heterotopic Cardiac Transplant Model

Toshiro Hirozane, MD; Akira Matsumori, MD; Yutaka Furukawa, MD; Shigetake Sasayama, MD

From the Third Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Correspondence to Akira Matsumori, MD, Third Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawaracho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606 Japan.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background The development of immunosuppressive therapy has brought about a remarkable decrease in the risk of acute cardiac allograft rejection; however, the major cause of patient death or retransplantation after the first postoperative year is coronary artery disease (CAD) in the graft. The pathogenesis and management of CAD are still not clearly established.

Methods and Results To make an animal model of CAD, we performed primary vascularized heterotopic cardiac transplantation using mice. Inbred strains, sharing major histocompatibility antigens but differing in minor antigens, were selected. DBA/2 mice (H-2d) served as donors and B10.D2 mice (H-2d) as recipients. Viability of the cardiac grafts was assessed by abdominal palpation. Eight of twelve cardiac allografts (67%) survived for 10 weeks after operation without any immunosuppressive therapy. Allografts rejected within 4 weeks showed acute rejection histologically, whereas allografts surviving more than 4 weeks displayed intimal hyperplasia in the coronary arteries, together with interstitial and perivascular fibrosis. The severity of intimal thickening in the graft coronary artery was then assessed by point counting. In allografts surviving for 70 days, intima comprised approximately 42% of the graft arterial wall, whereas in DBA/2 and B10.D2 syngeneic grafts, it comprised approximately 13%. A significant difference in percentage was observed between the intima area of allografts and that of syngrafts (P<.01, ANOVA). Long-term oral administration of cyclosporine at a dose of 40 mg/kg per day decreased the intima area to 34% (P<.05 versus nontreated allografts, ANOVA); however, this dose did not affect the incidence of arterial lesions.

Conclusions The histopathological features of DBA/2 allografts surviving for 10 weeks in B10.D2 recipient mice mimicked those in human CAD. Using this animal model, the beneficial effect of low-dose cyclosporine therapy on CAD was demonstrated, although this effect seemed to be limited. This DBA/2-B10.D2 mouse heterotopic cardiac transplant model provides valuable results for future studies of the disease.


Key Words: coronary disease • transplantation • rejection


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
With the rapid development of immunosuppressive therapy, the prevention and management of acute rejection have improved remarkably in cardiac transplant patients. At present, however, obstructive graft coronary artery disease (CAD) has emerged as a leading cause of late graft failure.1 2 Gao et al3 4 reported that there was a 34.5% incidence of CAD in the first year, 59% the second year, and 91% at 5 years after transplantation. There are several characteristic features that distinguish this disease from the usual coronary atherosclerosis.2 5 For instance, CAD progresses rapidly over a period of several months to a few years, whereas lesions of the common coronary atherosclerosis grow slowly over a period of many years. Histologically, CAD usually shows concentric narrowing of the arterial lumen with the involvement of both epicardial and smaller intramuscular arteries in a diffuse distribution; however, ordinary atherosclerosis is associated with eccentric luminal narrowing of epicardial arteries in a focal distribution. In addition, CAD selectively involves the arteries of the engrafted organ, with no effect on the recipient's own native vessels. The pathogenesis of CAD has not been clearly established, although recent research has suggested that it is due to chronic rejection of the graft after immunosuppressive therapy.6 7 8 In animal experiments using dogs, rabbits, and rats, the occurrence of similar vascular lesions has been reported under long-term treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.9 10 11 12 In the present study, the attempt was made to define a mouse model of CAD that requires no immunosuppression, using strains that share major histocompatibility antigens (MHC antigens) but differ from each other in multiple minor antigens.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
Adult male DBA/2 (H-2d) and B10.D2 (H-2d) mice, 7 to 9 weeks old, were obtained from the Shizuoka (Japan) Agricultural Cooperation Association. These mice were housed in stainless steel cages with controlled light/dark cycles and provided with food and water ad libitum.

Transplantation
DBA/2 mice served as donors and B10.D2 mice as recipients. These two strains are compatible with each other in MHC antigens but differ in minor histocompatible antigens (non-MHC antigens). DBA/2 and B10.D2 syngrafts were used as controls. Heterotopic cardiac transplantation was performed using a modification of the method described by Corry et al.13 In brief, donors and recipients were anesthetized with 4% chloral hydrate at 0.01 mL/g body wt ip before surgery. Donor hearts were perfused with chilled, heparinized saline via the inferior vena cava and harvested after ligation of the vena cava and pulmonary veins. The aorta and pulmonary artery of donor hearts were anastomosed to the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava of recipients using a microsurgical technique. Ischemic time was routinely 45 to 60 minutes, with a success rate of approximately 80%. Technical failures within the first 72 hours were excluded from the experiment. The viability of the cardiac allograft was assessed by daily abdominal palpation and confirmed by ECGs. The day of rejection was defined as the day of cessation of heartbeat.

Histopathological Examination
Mice were killed on the day of rejection or, if their grafts continued beating without rejection, 70 days after transplantation. Allografts were sectioned transversely at the maximal circumference of the ventricle and fixed in 10% formalin. The graft tissues were embedded in paraffin and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, and elastic van Gieson. Histological findings were scored under light microscopy to determine the severity of rejection and the degree of arterial intimal thickening, using modified scoring methods described previously.11 14 Grading systems are summarized in Tables 1Down and 2Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Histological Grades for Assessment of Degree of Rejection


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Histological Grades for Assessment of Vascular Disease

Morphometry of Neointima
In a previous report, the intimal cross-sectional areas of medium- to large-sized graft coronary arteries were estimated by point counting.15 Using an eyepiece grid with 100 points, the number of points lying over the intima or media was counted and the areas of the respective parts were calculated by a formula of 0.01xnumber of pointsxgrid area. Intima area (%) was defined as


Treatment With Cyclosporine
To investigate the effect of cyclosporine (CyA) on the graft arterial lesion, long-term oral CyA administration was performed using this animal model. CyA in a cremophor vehicle (Sandoz) was diluted in olive oil, and 0.12 mL was administered to each mouse. The treatment was carried out at a dose of 40 mg/kg per day, starting on the day of transplant and continuing for 70 days. This dose seems to be much higher than the dose used in humans; however, on the basis of body surface area, a given dose in mice is comparable to a dose that is about 12 times lower in humans.16 Thus, a dose of 40 mg/kg per day in mice is equivalent to a dose of 3.3 mg/kg per day in humans, which is within the range of long-term maintenance doses.17

Statistical Analysis
The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the allograft survival time or the histological grading scores, since these data were nonparametrically distributed. Morphometrical results for the intima area (%) were compared using one-way ANOVA. Data are expressed as mean±SD.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Graft Survival
The percent survival of DBA/2 transplanted hearts in B10.D2 recipient mice is shown in Fig 1Down. In this MHC-compatible combination, 8 of 12 cardiac allografts (67%) survived for 70 days after transplant without any immunosuppressive treatment. In the recipients treated with CyA at 40 mg/kg per day, 10 of 12 allografts (83%) survived for 70 days. Although CyA appeared to enhance the allograft survival at this dose, it was not statistically significant. This may be partly due to the fact that the long-term allograft survival rate in the nontreated mice was considerably high. Fig 2Down shows serial ECGs of a nontreated cardiac allograft that survived for 70 days. ECGs were taken 1 week, 4 weeks, and 10 weeks after transplantation. QRS complexes of the graft are indicated by arrows.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plot shows survival of cardiac grafts. Primary vascularized heterotopic mouse cardiac transplantation was performed. All of the DBA/2 or B10.D2 cardiac syngrafts (100%) survived for 10 weeks. Eight of 12 DBA/2 cardiac allografts (67%) survived for 10 weeks in B10.D2 recipients without immunosuppressive therapy. Under an oral treatment with cyclosporine (CyA) at a dose of 40 mg/kg per day, 10 of 12 allografts (83%) became long-term survivors. Viability was assessed by abdominal palpation.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Serial ECGs of a long-term surviving cardiac allograft. These ECGs were taken serially from a cardiac allograft that survived for 70 days. QRS complexes of the graft are indicated by arrows.

Histopathological Findings
The pathological features of cardiac allografts rejected within 4 weeks included interstitial edema, hemorrhage, myocardial necrosis, and severe mononuclear cell infiltration with diffuse fibrosis, suggesting acute rejection. In these grafts, coronary arteries showed marked mononuclear cell accumulation in the intima with occasional occlusion of the lumen (Fig 3ADown). The grafts that survived longer than 4 weeks displayed mild to moderate cellular infiltration and interstitial fibrosis with concentric intimal thickening (Fig 3BDown). Similar lesions were observed in the CyA-treated allografts surviving for 70 days; however, the severity of fibrosis and intimal thickening seemed less prominent than in the nontreated allografts (Fig 3CDown). DBA/2 syngrafts (Fig 3DDown) or B10.D2 syngrafts (Fig 3EDown) harvested on day 70 after transplant showed only slight perivascular fibrosis and trace cellular infiltration with minimal intimal thickening. Table 3Down summarizes the results of histological grading based on the nontreated allografts surviving for more than 4 weeks, since arterial lesions similar to human graft arteriosclerosis were observed in the long-term surviving allografts. Fig 4Down shows representative photographs of each grade of intimal thickening in graft coronary arteries. The data in Table 4Down are histological scores based on the CyA-treated allografts compared with those on the nontreated allografts. According to these data, the severity of graft arterial lesion was diminished by low-dose CyA treatment (P<.05 by the Mann-Whitney U test); however, the incidence of diseased arteries was not significantly affected by the treatment.



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Sections of mouse cardiac allografts and syngrafts. A, Section of an allograft rejected 17 days after surgery. Mononuclear cells accumulated in a coronary artery and became attached to the endothelium. Prominent perivascular cell infiltration is also noted (hematoxylin and eosin, x185). B, Section of an allograft surviving for 70 days after transplantation. In addition to moderate mononuclear cell infiltration and fibrosis, concentric intimal thickening was observed in a medium-sized coronary artery (Masson's trichrome, x185). C, Section of a 70-day-old allograft treated with cyclosporine. Cyclosporine was orally administered as described in "Methods." Histological appearance was similar with those of nontreated allografts; however, the severity of fibrosis and intimal hyperplasia appeared less prominent (Masson's trichrome, x185). D, Section of a 70-day-old DBA/2 syngraft. There was only slight cellular infiltration and fibrosis. Although slight perivascular fibrosis was noted, coronary arteries appeared intact (Masson's trichrome, x185). E, Section of a 70-day-old B10.D2 syngraft. Histological appearance was identical with those of DBA/2 syngrafts (Masson's trichrome, x185).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Histological Grading Scores for Long-term Surviving Nontreated Allografts



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Sections of various grades of coronary arteries in 70-day-old allografts. A, Grade 1, showing early changes of intimal proliferation; B, grade 2: there were vacuolated cells in the thickened intima, suggesting the presence of foam cells; C, grade 3: the area occupied by thickened intima extended to more than half of the lumen; and D, grade 4: the lumen was totally occluded by the proliferation of intima (elastic van Gieson, A through D, x370).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Histological Grading Scores for Cyclosporine-Treated Allografts Compared With Nontreated Allografts

Morphometric Examination
Intimal thickening in cardiac grafts surviving for 70 days was confirmed by point counting (Fig 5Down). Intima of coronary arteries in the nontreated allografts comprised 42.2±4.6% (mean±SD, n=8) of the arterial wall, whereas that of the DBA/2 or B10.D2 syngrafts comprised 13.1±2.3% (n=7) or 12.9±1.7% (n=8). There was a significant difference in percentage between the intima area of the nontreated allografts and that of the DBA/2 or B10.D2 syngrafts (P<.01 by ANOVA); however, no significant difference was noted between the two kinds of syngrafts. Percent intima area of the CyA-treated allografts was 33.5±7.6% (n=10), which was significantly lower than that of the nontreated allografts (P<.05 by ANOVA).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bar graph shows percent intima area of mouse cardiac grafts. DBA/2 syngrafts (n=7), B10.D2 syngrafts (n=8), nontreated cardiac allografts (n=8), and cyclosporine (CyA)-treated allografts (n=10) were harvested 70 days after heterotopic transplantation. The percent intima area of a graft was defined as the average value of the percent intima areas obtained by examining 6 to 12 sections of the coronary arteries in the graft, as described in "Methods." Each column represents the mean value ±SD of the percent intima area calculated from a total of all allografts or syngrafts. *P<.01 vs DBA/2 or B10.D syngrafts, **P<.05 vs CyA-treated allografts: one-way ANOVA.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present study, a mouse model of CAD was developed using a method of primary vascularized heterotopic cardiac transplantation. The arterial lesions developed in this DBA/2-B10.D2 model seem to have similarities with human CAD and to vessel lesions described in previous animal experiments.2 9 10 11 Intimal thickening of the affected graft coronary arteries in this model showed concentric narrowing of the lumen in a patchy distribution; however, no typical atheromatous plaque was observed. Assessment of graft arterial lesion by scoring was done by combining small, medium, and large vessels as described in a previous study,11 since no apparent differences were noted in the incidence and severity of vessel disease among arteries of different sizes. However, because of the difficulty in handling small vessels, morphometrical analysis by point counting was performed using medium- to large-sized arteries. Other histological features accompanying the arterial lesion included perivascular and interstitial fibrosis with mild to moderate mononuclear cell infiltration.

As shown in Table 3Up, there was no apparent correlation between the severity of rejection and the degree of vessel disease. The endothelium appeared intact in every section of the diseased artery under a light microscope, suggesting that the thickened intima consisted mainly of subendothelial cells. This observation was in accordance with previous immunohistochemical studies showing that cells comprising the neointima were mainly smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and T-lymphocytes.2 15 18 19 The pathogenetic roles of these cells in CAD have been reviewed.20 There is a general consensus that chronic repetitive arterial injuries by immunological mechanisms induce local inflammation, followed by the release of various cytokines and growth factors from activated T cells and macrophages, and then smooth muscle cell proliferation occurs. This hypothesis resembles the "response-to-injury" theory explaining the pathogenesis of ordinary native atherosclerosis.21

Salomon et al18 reported increased endothelial class II MHC antigen expression in human CAD and hypothesized that persistent T-cell stimulation by class II MHC-positive endothelium might initiate local inflammation. Recent studies have focused on the pathogenetic roles of a variety of mediator molecules of inflammation.22 23 Gregory et al15 demonstrated that long-term surviving rat allograft vessels had diffuse expressions of mRNAs for platelet-derived growth factor-{alpha} (PDGF-{alpha}), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}). Such growth factors and cytokines as PDGF, bFGF, IL-1, and tumor necrosis factor have been shown to stimulate smooth muscle cell proliferation and are regarded as important factors in the pathogenesis of both hyperplastic neointima and common atherosclerotic plaque.21 24 25 26 27

In addition, the role of thrombus in the progression of CAD has been discussed by several researchers. Hunt et al28 demonstrated that human heart transplant recipients had increased levels of fibrinogen, factor VII, and von Willebrand factor antigen and speculated that a prothrombotic state in recipients might induce fibrin deposition in the graft arterial lesion. Wissler et al29 reported that the native human advanced concentric atherosclerosis was much more prone to thrombosis with higher circulating immune complex concentration in the sera than the more usual eccentric atheroma. These researchers hypothesized that the immune complex might play a role in provoking endothelial injury and initiating the atherosclerotic process, which includes formation of thrombus, in both the pathogeneses of advanced atherosclerosis and transplant-related arteritis. An increase in the incidence of anti-MHC antibodies and soluble donor antigens, observed in the sera of human recipients who had chronically rejected cardiac allografts, may support this hypothesis.30 At present, thrombus seems to be regarded as a secondary factor that accompanies immunological arterial injury and exaggerates CAD.

Although there have been numerous immunobiological findings concerning CAD, as mentioned above, the actual pathogenesis still remains poorly understood. To further investigate the pathogenesis and management of CAD, a more reliable animal model must be defined. There have been a number of animal models of the disease proposed using dogs, rabbits, and rats; however, most of these required treatment with immunosuppressive drugs to prevent acute rejection.9 10 11 12 Because immunosuppressive drugs have been known to be associated with the acceleration of atherosclerosis,31 32 the development of an animal model that requires no immunosuppression would be preferable. Cramer et al14 succeeded in producing arterial lesions similar to CAD without immunosuppression by using inbred rat strains that were MHC compatible but non–MHC incompatible with each other. Adams et al33 defined another rat cardiac transplant model using MHC-compatible Lewis and F-344 strains; however, 70% of the total allografts were rejected within 10 weeks when no immunosuppression was used. To define a more favorable animal model, we attempted to use inbred mice, since there is a wider variety of commercially available strains of mice than of rats. As previous rat models have shown difficulty in getting long-term surviving allografts across MHC barriers without immunosuppression, a combination of MHC-compatible strains was selected for the models in this study. In this mouse model, donor DBA/2 and recipient B10.D2 mice shared identical class I and class II MHC alloantigens and differed in multiple non-MHC antigens.34 An advantage of this mouse model is that the rate of allograft survival reached 67% at posttransplant day 70 without any immunosuppressive treatment, demonstrating its usefulness for researching the pathogenetic process of CAD under a drug-free condition. The efficacy of various new drugs might be assessed more clearly using this model, since vascular toxicity of such a drug as cyclosporine or prednisolone at their initial high induction doses can be avoided. This advantage, on the other hand, seems to make it possible to assess the net effect of conventional immunosuppressive drugs at low maintenance doses without influences of high initial induction doses.

In the present study, the effect of low-dose CyA maintenance therapy on the graft arterial lesion was investigated, since CAD has been known to emerge as a major problem during the posttransplant maintenance period. The results showed that the therapy decreased the severity of the graft arterial lesion; however, it did not affect the incidence of the disease. These results may suggest that long-term CyA therapy at a low maintenance dose is itself not an aggravating factor in CAD; rather, it is partially effective in delaying the speed at which CAD evolves. However, to develop better management of CAD, further study, including various combination therapies, should be performed using this mouse model.

Recently, Russell et al35 reported new mouse models of CAD using B10.A-B10.BR, bm12-C57BL/6, and 129-C57BL/6 combinations. They succeeded in producing similar graft arterial lesions as rat models; however, in their models, interrelation of the arterial lesion with other pathological features, for instance, fibrosis or cellular infiltration, appeared to be somewhat obscure compared with this model. This interrelation should be discussed more clearly in their article, since allograft arteritis, presenting mononuclear cell accumulation in the intima with endothelial disruption, has been known to be associated with acute rejection rather than chronic rejection.33

Conclusions
A new mouse model of CAD was defined, which holds promise for the future studies of the disease.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a research grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan and a grant-in-aid for general scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan. We would like to thank J. Shelby and H. Kikuchi for technical instructions regarding the murine cardiac transplant procedure.

Received January 21, 1994; accepted August 22, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Bieber CP, Hunt SA, Schwinn DA, Jamieson SA, Reitz BA, Oyer PE, Shumway NE, Stinson EB. Complication in long-term survivors of cardiac transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1981;13:207-211. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Billingham ME. Cardiac transplant atherosclerosis. Transplant Proc. 1987;19(suppl 5):19-25
  3. Gao SZ, Schroeder JS, Alderman EL, Hunt SA, Silverman JF, Wiederhold V, Stinson EB. Clinical and laboratory correlates of accelerated coronary artery disease in the cardiac transplant patient. Circulation. 1987;76(suppl V):V-56-V-61.
  4. Gao SZ, Alderman EL, Schroeder JS, Silverman JF, Hunt SA. Accelerated coronary vascular disease in the heart transplant patient: coronary arteriographic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:334-340. [Abstract]
  5. Billingham ME. Graft coronary disease: the lesions and the patients. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:3665-3666. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Uretsky BF, Murali S, Reddy PS, Rabin B, Lee A, Griffith BP, Hardesty RL, Trento A, Bahnson HT. Development of coronary artery disease in cardiac transplant patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine and prednisone. Circulation. 1987;76:827-834. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hess JL, Hastillo A, Mohanakumar T, Cowley MJ, Vetrovac G, Szentpetery S, Wolfgang TC, Lower RR. Accelerated atherosclerosis in cardiac transplantation: role of cytotoxic B-cell antibodies and hyperlipidemia. Circulation. 1983;68(suppl II):II-94-II-101.
  8. Rose EA, Smith CR, Petrossian GA, Barr ML, Reemtsma K. Humoral immune responses after cardiac transplantation: correlation with fatal rejection and graft arteriosclerosis. Surgery. 1989;106:203-208. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kosek JC, Bieber C, Lower RR. Heart graft arteriosclerosis. Transplant Proc. 1971;3:512-514. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Alonso DR, Sorek PK, Minick R. Studies on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis induced in rabbit cardiac allografts by synergy of graft rejection and hypercholesterolemia. Am J Pathol. 1977; 87:415-433.
  11. Lurie KG, Billingham ME, Jamieson SW, Harrison DC, Reitz BA. Pathogenesis and prevention of graft atherosclerosis in an experimental heart transplant model. Transplantation. 1981;31:41-47. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Sarris GE, Mitchell RS, Billingham ME, Glasson JR, Cahill PD, Miller DC. Inhibition of accelerated cardiac allograft arteriosclerosis by fish oil. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:841-855. [Abstract]
  13. Corry RJ, Winn HJ, Russel PS. Primary vascularized allografts of hearts in mice. Transplantation. 1973;16:344-350.
  14. Cramer DV, Qian S, Harnaha J, Chapman FA, Estes LW, Starzl TE, Makowka L. Cardiac transplantation in the rat, I: the effect of histocompatibility differences on graft arteriosclerosis. Transplantation. 1989;47:414-419. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gregory CR, Huie P, Billingham ME, Morris RE. Rapamycin inhibits arterial intimal thickening caused by both alloimmune and mechanical injury. Transplantation. 1993;55:1409-1418. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Chordera A, Feller K. Some aspects of pharmacokinetic and biotransformation differences in humans and mammal animals. Int J Clin Pharmacol. 1978;16:357-360.
  17. Bernabeu M, Krupp P, Wiskott E. Long-term safety of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients: worldwide experience. Transplant Proc. 1993;25(suppl III):17-19.
  18. Salomon RN, Hughes CCW, Schoen FJ, Payne DD, Pober JS, Libby P. Human coronary transplantation-associated arteriosclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1991;138:791-798. [Abstract]
  19. Adams DH, Wright TC, Karnovsky MJ. Immunocytochemical analysis of transplant atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation. 1987;76(suppl IV):IV-314. Abstract.
  20. Paul LC, Fellstrom B. Chronic vascular rejection of the heart and the kidney: have rational treatment options emerged? Transplantation. 1992;53:1169-1179. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: an update. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:488-500. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Soulillou JP. Cytokines and transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:106-108. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Halloran PF, Cockfield SM, Madrenas J. The mediators of inflammation (interleukin 1, interferon-g, and tumor necrosis) and their relevance to rejection. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:26-30. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Lindner V, Lappi DA, Baird A, Majack RA, Reidy MA. Role of basic fibroblast growth factor in vascular lesion formation. Circ Res. 1991;68:106-113. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ikeda U, Ikeda M, Oohara T, Kano S, Yaginuma T. Mitogenic action of interleukin-1a on vascular smooth muscle cells mediated by PDGF. Atherosclerosis. 1990;84:183-188. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Stemme S, Jonasson L, Holm J, Hansson GK. Immunologic control of vascular cell growth in arterial response to injury and atherosclerosis. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:3697-3699. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hansson GK, Holm J, Jonasson L. Detection of activated T lymphocytes in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Am J Pathol. 1989;135:169-175. [Abstract]
  28. Hunt BJ, Segal H, Yacoub M. Hemostatic changes in heart transplant recipients and their relationship to accelerated coronary sclerosis. Transplantation. 1993;55:309-315. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wissler RW, Vesselinovitch D, Ko C. The effects of circulating immune complex on atherosclerotic lesions in experimental animals and in younger and older humans. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21:3707-3708.
  30. Suciu-Foca N, Reed E, Marboe C, Harris P, Xi YP, Yu-kai S, Ho E, Rose E, Reemtsma K, King DW. The role of anti-heart antibodies in heart transplantation. Transplantation. 1991;51:716-724.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Emeson EE, Shen ML. Accelerated atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic C57BL/6 mice treated with cyclosporin A. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1906-1915. [Abstract]
  32. Bulkley BH, Roberts WC. The heart in systemic lupus erythematosus and the changes induced in it by corticosteroid therapy: a study of 36 necropsy patients. Am J Med. 1975;58:243-264. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Adams DH, Tilney NL, Collins JJ, Karnovski MJ. Experimental graft arteriosclerosis, I: the Lewis-to-F-344 allograft model. Transplantation. 1992;53:1115-1119. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Miconnet I, Bruley-Rosset M, Halle-Pannenko O. Mls-1a-induced peripheral tolerance to host minor histocompatibility antigens in radiation bone marrow chimeras. J Immunol. 1992;148:3706-3713. [Abstract]
  35. Russell PS, Chase CM, Winn HJ, Colvin RB. Coronary atherosclerosis in transplanted mouse hearts, I: time course and immunogenetic and immunopathological considerations. Am J Pathol. 1994;144:260-274. [Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Saiura, M. Sata, K.-i. Hiasa, S. Kitamoto, M. Washida, K. Egashira, R. Nagai, and M. Makuuchi
Antimonocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Gene Therapy Attenuates Graft Vasculopathy
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2004; 24(10): 1886 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. Hattori, H. Shimokawa, M. Higashi, J. Hiroki, Y. Mukai, K. Kaibuchi, and A. Takeshita
Long-Term Treatment With a Specific Rho-Kinase Inhibitor Suppresses Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Mice
Circ. Res., January 9, 2004; 94(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Izawa, J.-i. Suzuki, W. Takahashi, J. Amano, and M. Isobe
Tranilast Inhibits Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Association With p21Waf1/Cip1 Expression on Neointimal Cells in Murine Cardiac Transplantation Model
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2001; 21(7): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.-W. Hwang, A. Matsumori, Y. Furukawa, K. Ono, M. Okada, A. Iwasaki, M. Hara, and S. Sasayama
FTY720, a New Immunosuppressant, Promotes Long-Term Graft Survival and Inhibits the Progression of Graft Coronary Artery Disease in a Murine Model of Cardiac Transplantation
Circulation, September 21, 1999; 100(12): 1322 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
P. Carmeliet, L. Moons, and D. Collen
Mouse models of angiogenesis, arterial stenosis, atherosclerosis and hemostasis
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1998; 39(1): 8 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Raisanen-Sokolowski, T. Glysing-Jensen, P. L. Mottram, and M. E Russell
Sustained Anti-CD4/CD8 Treatment Blocks Inflammatory Activation and Intimal Thickening in Mouse Heart Allografts
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 1997; 17(10): 2115 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Furukawa, A. Matsumori, T. Hirozane, and S. Sasayama
Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist TCV-116 Reduces Graft Coronary Artery Disease and Preserves Graft Status in a Murine Model : A Comparative Study With Captopril
Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 333 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirozane, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasayama, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirozane, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasayama, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Transplantation