(Circulation. 1995;91:1229-1235.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Second Department of Internal Medicine (Y.H., H.H., E.S., K. Kimura, M.O.) and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (K. Kikuchi, T.N., M.H.), University of Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to Yasunobu Hirata, MD, the Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results To obtain direct evidence of its release and its alteration in deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertension, EDNO released from renal vessels by ET stimulation was assayed by a highly sensitive chemiluminescence method. Kidneys were isolated from DOCA-salt and control rats, and renal perfusion pressure (RPP) and EDNO (by hydrogen peroxideluminol chemiluminescence) in the perfusate were monitored simultaneously during perfusion of ET-1, ET-3, an ETA receptor antagonist (BQ-123), and an ETB receptor agonist (BQ-3020). In control rats, ET-1 and ET-3 dose-dependently increased both RPP and NO release. Although the vasoconstricting effects of ET-1 were greater, their NO-releasing effects were comparable. The increase in NO release by ETs was inhibited by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. After 10-6 mol/L BQ-123 treatment, ET-1 decreased RPP and increased NO release in control kidneys. DOCA-salt rats responded to these agents with much less NO release. BQ-3020 at up to 10-10 mol/L caused vasodilation (RPP, 10-11 mol/L, -5.4±1.7%, P<.01) associated with increased NO release in control kidneys (+9.0±2.7 fmol · min-1 · g-1 kidney wt, P<.01). However, in DOCA-salt kidneys, BQ-3020 caused renal vasoconstriction (RPP, +5.4±2.4%, P<.01 versus control) and a much smaller NO release (+1.1±0.4 fmol · min-1 · g-1 kidney wt, P<.01 versus control). Northern blot analysis revealed that renal ETB mRNA was significantly decreased in DOCA-salt rat kidneys compared with controls (0.36±0.13 versus 1.00±0.23, P<.05).
Conclusions These results suggest that ET-1 and ET-3 release EDNO via ETB receptors in renal vessels. ETB-mediated NO release was reduced in DOCA-salt rats, which may modulate renal function and thus blood pressure regulation in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats.
Key Words: endothelium-derived factors endothelin hypertension kidney
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The molecular cloning of ET receptors has strongly suggested that the biphasic effect of ET can be attributed to a combination of vasoconstriction mediated by ETA receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells7 and vasodilation mediated by ETB receptors on vascular endothelial cells.8 ET-1 binds to both ETA and ETB receptors, whereas ET-3 binds mostly to ETB receptors.7 8 The ETB receptor is an isopeptide nonselective receptor that is thought to cause release of NO when bound.8 9 10 The effect of ETB binding on NO release has been assayed by measurements of NO metabolites, NOx,9 10 and of the second messenger of NO, cGMP, mostly in cultured cells.9 10 11 12 This hypothesis is also supported by data that the vasodilatory effects of ET-1 can be suppressed by NO synthase inhibitors, such as NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), and by a soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor, methylene blue, in various vasculature model systems.13 14 15 However, since these experiments did not measure NO directly, simultaneous changes in vascular tone and NO release caused by ETs have not been demonstrated. For example, it is not known whether the transient vasodilation induced by ET is due to a transient release of NO. Furthermore, the involvement of EDNO in ET-induced vasodilation remains controversial. Baydoun et al16 showed that ET-1induced coronary vasodilation in isolated rat heart was independent of prostaglandin (PG)I2 or EDNO, because neither cyclooxygenase inhibitors nor EDNO inhibitors suppressed ET-induced vasodilation. Ohlstein et al17 observed similar phenomena in a rat hindquarter model. Moreover, Okamura et al18 showed that ET-3induced vasodilation in dog coronary artery was inhibited by PGI2 synthesis inhibitors but not by EDNO inhibitors.
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is generally impaired in hypertensive vessels, suggesting the existence of endothelial damage. We have reported that acetylcholine-evoked NO release was markedly reduced in DOCA-saltinduced hypertension.19 20 Various mechanisms may underlie this reduction in DOCA-salt hypertension, including a reduction in NO synthesis from the NO synthase substrate, L-arginine, and an alteration in endothelial receptors. We noted that L-arginine supplementation partially reversed the reduction in NO release and in endothelium-dependent vasodilation by acetylcholine in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats.21 On the other hand, receptor-mediated NO release may also be impaired. Although the response to exogenously administered acetylcholine was reduced in DOCA-salt hypertension, it is unlikely that cholinergic stimulation actually plays a role in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the kidney in vivo. In contrast, endogenous ET is likely to participate in the pathophysiological regulation of EDNO release via autocrine or paracrine mechanisms.
We recently developed a highly sensitive assay system for EDNO using a chemiluminescent reaction and applied it to the isolated perfused rat kidney to monitor the NO concentration of the perfusate simultaneously with renal perfusion pressure.20 22 In the present study, we used this assay to examine the effects of ET receptor stimulation on renal vascular resistance and NO release in normal and DOCA-salt hypertensive rat kidney.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolated Perfused Kidney
On the day of the experiment, rats
were anesthetized with 30
mg/kg pentobarbital IP, and the right kidney was isolated and perfused
as previously described.24 In brief, after an abdominal
incision, we punctured the mesenteric artery with an 18-gauge
double-lumen needle and positioned the tip in the right renal artery.
Perfusion was then started at 5 mL/min with a Krebs-Henseleit buffer,
and the kidney was isolated without ischemia. Buffer was saturated with
95% O2/5% CO2 at 37°C and contained
10-6 mol/L phenylephrine to maintain perfusion pressure at
about 100 mm Hg. The renal vein was also cannulated to drain the
perfusate into the NO assay system.
Measurement of NO Release
NO concentration in the perfusate
was measured with a
chemiluminescence assay.20 22 The venous effluent was
introduced at 2 mL/min by a double-head plunger pump into a rotary
mixer for thorough mixing with a chemiluminescence probe of 10 mmol/L
hydrogen peroxide, 18 µmol/L recrystallized luminol (Sigma Chemical
Co), 2 mmol/L potassium carbonate, and 150 mmol/L desferrioxamine to
chelate iron ions derived from hemoglobin. The probe was pumped at 0.5
mL/min by another plunger pump. The mixture of the perfusate and probe
then entered a chemiluminescence detector. The chemiluminescent signal
was measured continuously and recorded on a standard pen recorder.
Renal perfusion pressure (RPP) was monitored at the renal artery
through the double-lumen needle connected to a pressure transducer. The
dead volume of the system between the renal vein and the detector was
0.5 mL, introducing a 15-second lag time between perfusion pressure
changes and chemiluminescent signals. The NO signal was calibrated with
an NO solution or horseradish peroxidase, and the zero point was
adjusted by use of the perfusate.20 22
Study Protocol
After a 60-minute period of perfusion for
equilibration, we
assayed the effects of vehicle, ET-1 (Peptide Institute), and L-NMMA
(Sigma) on RPP and NO chemiluminescence. The agents were administered
by infusion pumps at 0.25 mL/min in this order: vehicle;
10-12 mol/L, 10-11 mol/L,
10-10
mol/L, and 10-9 mol/L ET-1; and 10-4 mol/L
L-NMMA at 10-minute intervals. The effects of ET-3 (Peptide Institute)
were measured in the same way. To study the role of ETA in
the effects of ET-1, we assayed the effects of an ETA
antagonist, BQ-123 (Banyu Tsukuba Research Institute),25
on ET-1induced changes in RPP and NO chemiluminescence. In a
preliminary study, BQ-123 dose-dependently inhibited 10-10
mol/L ET-1induced vasoconstriction with an IC50 value of
10-8 mol/L, a value similar to the
2.2x10-8
mol/L in the binding assay of the original report.25
Infusion of 10-6 mol/L BQ-123 began 10 minutes before the
graded doses of ET-1 were infused. Finally, to compare the responses to
pure ETB stimulation, we studied the effects of an
ETB agonist, BQ-3020 (Banyu).26 These effects
of ET-1, ET-3, L-NMMA, BQ-123, and BQ-3020 on RPP and NO release were
compared for control and DOCA-salttreated rats.
ET Levels in the Plasma and Perfusate
Blood was collected
from the abdominal aorta of similarly
treated DOCA-salt rats and control rats (n=5 each) under pentobarbital
anesthesia (30 mg/kg IP). Blood was immediately centrifuged at 4°C in
a tube containing disodium EDTA and aprotinin. The release rate of ET
into the perfusate from the isolated kidney was determined. The kidneys
from 8 DOCA-salt rats and 8 control rats were isolated and perfused
with the Krebs-Henseleit buffer at 5 mL/min as described above. After a
60-minute equilibration period, the venous effluent was collected for
60 minutes. Collecting tubes were changed every 15 minutes. Plasma and
perfusate concentrations of ET were measured by radioimmunoassay after
extraction with a Sep-Pak C18 column as previously
reported.27
Northern Blot Analysis of ETA and ETB
Receptor mRNA
RNA was extracted from the kidneys of DOCA-salt rats
(blood
pressure, 204±8 mm Hg, mean±SEM) and control rats (blood
pressure,
132±4 mm Hg; n=4 each) by the acid guanidinium
thiocyanatephenolchloroform method,28 as reported
previously.29 30 Poly(A+) RNA was
obtained by
use of oligo dT latex (Oligotex-dT30, Takara Shuzo Co). Two micrograms
per lane of Poly(A+) RNA was subjected to electrophoresis
on a 1.5% agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane. After
ultraviolet cross-linking, the membrane was prehybridized at 37°C,
followed by hybridization overnight at 37°C with
32P-labeled rat ETA and ETB cDNAs.
cDNAs were prepared by the reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) and subcloned by the method of Eguchi et
al.31 The washed membrane was exposed to x-ray film at
-80°C for 24 to 72 hours. ß-Actin mRNA was used as a loading
control with a commercially available cDNA probe (Takara Shuzo Co).
ETA, ETB, and ß-actin mRNA
signals were quantified on a laser densitometer, and the ratios of
ETA and ETB to ß-actin signals were
calculated.
Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SEM.
The effects of the agents
tested were assessed by ANOVA for repeated measures followed by a
modified t test (Dunnett's test). Comparisons between
DOCA-salt and control rats were assessed by an unpaired Student's
t test. P<.05 was considered to be statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fig 1
demonstrates the representative tracings
of RPP and NO signals during ET-1, ET-3, and acetylcholine infusion.
ET-1 dose-dependently increased RPP. NO signals rose almost in parallel
with RPP in control rats, whereas DOCA-salttreated rats showed a low
baseline and little response in NO chemiluminescence to ET-1. As shown
in Fig 1C
, although the rise in RPP caused by ET-3 was smaller
than
that by ET-1, ET-3 caused similar increases in NO signals. Both ET-1
and ET-3 caused rapid increases in NO chemiluminescence but only
gradual elevations of RPP. Particularly when ET-1 was given at
concentrations less than 10-10 mol/L, the RPP increase to
reach the plateau levels lagged behind the NO release. Addition of
L-NMMA further increased RPP and diminished NO chemiluminescence. The
NO-releasing activity of ET-1 and ET-3 was smaller than that of
acetylcholine (Fig 1D
). As summarized in Fig 2
,
ET-1
caused a dose-dependent elevation of RPP and NO signals in the
controls. However, baseline NO release was much higher in the control
rats than in DOCA-salt rats (26.9±12.3 versus 3.5±1.8
fmol · min-1 · g-1 kidney wt,
P<.01), and the response of NO chemiluminescence to ET-1
treatment was negligible in DOCA-salt rats. On the other hand, ET-3 had
different effects on RPP than ET-1 (Fig 3
). In kidneys
from control rats, lower concentrations of ET-3 tended to decrease RPP,
and doses higher than 10-9 mol/L were required to increase
RPP. Despite the bimodal response of RPP, NO chemiluminescence
increased in an ET-3 dose-dependent fashion. The NO-releasing activity
of ET-3 in control rats was comparable to that of ET-1. In
DOCA-salttreated rats, ET-3induced increases in NO
chemiluminescence were minimal, and doses as low as 10-11
mol/L increased RPP, resulting in significant differences in pressor
responses to 10-11 and 10-10 mol/L ET-3 from
those in control rats.
|
|
|
Fig 4
compares the effects of ET-1 in the presence of
the ETA antagonist BQ-123. Although BQ-123 alone influenced
neither RPP nor NO chemiluminescence, pretreatment with
10-6 mol/L BQ-123 abolished ET-1induced increases in
RPP
at concentrations of ET-1 lower than 10-10 mol/L. BQ-123
significantly increased NO release at concentrations of ET-1 higher
than 10-10 mol/L, compared with NO release in its absence
(P<.05). BQ-123 also reduced the effects of ET-1 on RPP in
DOCA-salt rats. However, the increase in NO release in DOCA-salt rats
was minimal. Fig 5
compares the effects of an
ETB agonist, BQ-3020, on DOCA-salt and control rat kidneys.
In the controls, BQ-3020 reduced RPP at concentrations lower than
10-11 mol/L. At 10-9 mol/L, BQ-3020
increased
RPP. BQ-3020 also caused a dose-dependent increase in NO release
despite its biphasic effects on RPP. DOCA-salt rat kidneys responded
differently to BQ-3020 than did controls. In DOCA-salt rat kidneys,
there was no depressor response to any dose of BQ-3020, and doses
higher than 10-11 mol/L increased RPP significantly.
Furthermore, the increase in NO chemiluminescence caused by BQ-3020 was
much smaller in DOCA-salt rats.
|
|
Plasma immunoreactive ET concentration did not differ between the two groups of rats (DOCA-salt, 3.6±0.9 pg/mL versus control, 2.7±0.5 pg/mL, P=NS). The release rate of ET into the perfusate was stable during the 60-minute perfusion period. The average rate in DOCA-salt rats was 4.3±0.8 pg/min, similar to that in controls (4.3±1.0 pg/min).
Northern blot analysis detected ETB mRNA from rat
kidneys at about 4.8 kb, consistent with a previous
report.31 As shown in Fig 6
, the ratio of
renal ETB mRNA to ß-actin mRNA was significantly lower in
DOCA-salt rats than in control rats. ETA mRNA was detected
at about 5.2 kb, and the ratio of ETA to ß-actin mRNA was
comparable in the two groups of kidneys (Fig 7
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Possible pathogenetic roles of ET in hypertension have frequently been discussed because of its potent vasoconstrictive activity.3 However, whether the vascular reactivity to ET is increased in DOCA-salttreated animals remains controversial. Nguyen et al32 showed that ET-1induced mesenteric vasoconstriction was reduced in DOCA-salt hypertension. Deng and Schiffrin33 reported further that this reduced response was selective for ET-1. On the other hand, other studies have reported increased vasoconstrictive responses to ET in DOCA-salt rats.34 35 A report from the former group also demonstrated decreases in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration responses, inositol triphosphate turnover, and ET binding to the vasculature in DOCA-salt rats,36 suggesting the downregulation of ET receptors. Despite the controversy, it has remained unclear which receptor subtype was altered in these rats. Our data showed that ET-3induced renal vasoconstriction was significantly increased in the DOCA-salt group, associated with reduced NO release by ET-3. Furthermore, the response to a specific ETB agonist, BQ-3020, was similar to that to ET-3 in both rat groups. We therefore conclude that ETB-mediated effects are impaired in DOCA-salt rats. It is unclear whether this alteration was due to downregulation of ETB receptors. However, we have already reported that DOCA-salt rats were markedly hyporesponsive to acetylcholine in both renal vasodilation and NO release and showed endothelial damage by histology.20 21 22 DOCA-salt rats were also hyporesponsive to bradykinin, histamine, and ADP (unpublished observations). Furthermore, plasma and perfusate ET levels in DOCA-salt rats were comparable to those of controls in the present study. These findings suggest that intact ETB receptors on the endothelium may be reduced by mechanical or metabolic insults rather than by functional receptor downregulation in DOCA-salt rats due to elevated ET concentrations. This is compatible with the results of the Northern blot analysis of ETB mRNA, although we did not determine the cells of origin of these mRNAs within the kidney.
The response of RPP to ET-3 and BQ-3020 was quite distinct in the two groups of kidneys. An ETB agonist at low concentrations decreased RPP in control kidneys, whereas it increased RPP in DOCA-salt kidneys. This may be due to the difference in the NO release induced by ETs in these groups. In DOCA-salt hypertension, plasma ET-like immunoreactivity has consistently been reported as normal,32 34 37 whereas the arterial ET-1 contents and expression of its mRNA were increased.38 39 Moreover, although the origin of circulating ET-3 remains undetermined, the plasma concentration of ET-3 has been reported to be normal in DOCA-salt rats.37 Therefore, even though ET levels are comparable between DOCA-salt rats and controls, a decrease in ETB receptors in the endothelial cells of DOCA-salt rats may contribute to renal vasoconstriction.
As noted above, decreases in the endothelial ETB receptors may lead to the potentiation of ET-1induced vasoconstriction. Furthermore, it has been reported that ET induces EDNO release, while EDNO seems to suppress ET release. It has been shown that ET secretion from porcine aorta and from cultured endothelial cells was increased by L-NMMA40 and by oxyhemoglobin,41 respectively. Therefore, the decreased release of EDNO by DOCA-salt rat kidney may potentiate the vasoconstrictive action of ET-1. Nevertheless, the pressor response of DOCA-salt rat kidney vasculature to ET-1 was comparable to that of controls. Recent studies suggest that ETB receptors expressed in the vascular smooth muscle cells are involved in its contraction.42 43 In the present study, a high concentration of BQ-3020 caused a substantial increase in RPP even in the control rat kidneys. This effect seems to be due to the stimulation of not only ETA but also ETB receptors in the smooth muscle cells. Therefore, the lack of changes in ETA mRNA and a decrease in ETB mRNA in the smooth muscle cells may explain the lack of differences in the pressor response to ET-1 between DOCA-salt rats and controls.
We observed generalized alteration of endothelial function, as reflected by NO release, in DOCA-salt hypertension. Recent studies suggest that EDNO not only regulates vascular tone but also facilitates sodium excretion through direct effects on glomerular hemodynamics and tubular reabsorption.44 45 46 47 De Nicola et al46 showed that L-NMMA decreased proximal reabsorption. Stoos et al47 also reported that NO decreased solute transport and increased cGMP concentrations in the cortical collecting ducts. These data imply that a decrease in EDNO may increase sodium retention and contribute to maintenance of hypertension, particularly salt-sensitive hypertension.
In conclusion, both ET-1 and ET-3 stimulate EDNO release via ETB receptors. ETB-mediated NO release and renal vasodilation are altered in DOCA-salttreated rats, suggesting that impaired agonist-induced NO release may modulate the renal function and thus blood pressure regulation in salt-dependent hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 9, 1994; revision received September 6, 1994; accepted September 23, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. P. Schneider, E. W. Inscho, and D. M. Pollock Attenuated vasoconstrictor responses to endothelin in afferent arterioles during a high-salt diet Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): F1208 - F1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jesmin, S. Zaedi, S. Maeda, I. Yamaguchi, K. Goto, and T. Miyauchi Effects of a Selective Endothelin A Receptor Antagonist on the Expressions of iNOS and eNOS in the Heart of Early Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 925 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Herrera, P. A. Ortiz, and J. L. Garvin Regulation of thick ascending limb transport: role of nitric oxide Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1279 - F1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vargas, J. M. Moreno, I. Rodriguez-Gomez, R. Wangensteen, A. Osuna, M. Alvarez-Guerra, and J. Garcia-Estan Vascular and renal function in experimental thyroid disorders Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 154(2): 197 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Takeda, H. Nishimatsu, E. Suzuki, H. Satonaka, D. Nagata, S. Oba, M. Sata, M. Takahashi, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Terauchi, et al. Ghrelin Improves Renal Function in Mice with Ischemic Acute Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 113 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Just, A. J. M. Olson, J. R. Falck, and W. J. Arendshorst NO and NO-independent mechanisms mediate ETB receptor buffering of ET-1-induced renal vasoconstriction in the rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): R1168 - R1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Conrad Mechanisms of Renal Vasodilation and Hyperfiltration During Pregnancy Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2004; 11(7): 438 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Conrad and J. Novak Emerging role of relaxin in renal and cardiovascular function Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): R250 - R261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Liu, R. T. Premont, C. D. Kontos, J. Huang, and D. C. Rockey Endothelin-1 Activates Endothelial Cell Nitric-oxide Synthase via Heterotrimeric G-protein {beta}{gamma} Subunit Signaling to Protein Kinase B/Akt J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2003; 278(50): 49929 - 49935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishimatsu, Y. Hirata, T. Shindo, H. Kurihara, M. Kakoki, D. Nagata, H. Hayakawa, H. Satonaka, M. Sata, A. Tojo, et al. Role of Endogenous Adrenomedullin in the Regulation of Vascular Tone and Ischemic Renal Injury: Studies on Transgenic/Knockout Mice of Adrenomedullin Gene Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 657 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Notenboom, D. S. Miller, P. Smits, F. G. M. Russel, and R. Masereeuw Role of NO in endothelin-regulated drug transport in the renal proximal tubule Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): F458 - F464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Mori, G. L. King, A. C. Clermont, D. K. Bursell, and S.-E. Bursell Endothelin-3 Regulation of Retinal Hemodynamics in Nondiabetic and Diabetic Rats Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2000; 41(12): 3955 - 3962. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Plato, D. M. Pollock, and J. L. Garvin Endothelin inhibits thick ascending limb chloride flux via ETB receptor-mediated NO release Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): F326 - F333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. KAKOKI, Y. HIRATA, H. HAYAKAWA, E. SUZUKI, D. NAGATA, A. TOJO, H. NISHIMATSU, N. NAKANISHI, Y. HATTORI, K. KIKUCHI, et al. Effects of Tetrahydrobiopterin on Endothelial Dysfunction in Rats with Ischemic Acute Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2000; 11(2): 301 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Berthold, A. Just, H. R. Kirchheim, and H. Ehmke Interaction Between Nitric Oxide and Endogenous Vasoconstrictors in Control of Renal Blood Flow Hypertension, December 1, 1999; 34(6): 1254 - 1258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhang, B. Luo, S.-J. Chen, G. A. Abrams, and M. B. Fallon Endothelin-1 stimulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the pathogenesis of hepatopulmonary syndrome Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 1999; 277(5): G944 - G952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. ALLCOCK, M. HUKKANEN, J. M. POLAK, J. S. POLLOCK, and D. M. POLLOCK Increased Nitric Oxide Synthase-3 Expression in Kidneys of Deoxycorticosterone Acetate-Salt Hypertensive Rats J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 1999; 10(11): 2283 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. GROSS, W. SCHNEIDER, W.-H. SCHUNCK, E. MERVAALA, and F. C. LUFT Chronic Effects of Lovastatin and Bezafibrate on Cortical and Medullary Hemodynamics in Deoxycorticosterone Acetate-Salt Hypertensive Mice J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 1999; 10(7): 1430 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. RUSCHITZKA, S. SHAW, D. GYGI, G. NOLL, M. BARTON, and T. F. LÜSCHER Endothelial Dysfunction in Acute Renal Failure: Role of Circulatingand Tissue Endothelin-1 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 1999; 10(5): 953 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
|