| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1995;92:47-53.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Cardiology Division of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Correspondence to John R. Wilson, MD, Cardiology Division, Room CC-2218 MCN, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2170.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results This study was undertaken to investigate the
relation between exertional symptoms, ventilatory and skeletal muscle
dysfunction, and circulatory function in patients with heart failure.
To this end, 52 ambulatory patients with heart failure underwent
hemodynamic monitoring during maximal treadmill exercise testing.
During exercise, the severity of dyspnea and fatigue was evaluated on a
scale of 6 to 20 (Borg scale). The level of perceived exercise
intolerance during daily activities was evaluated with the Minnesota
Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue
Index. Maximal treadmill exercise increased the
O2 to 13.4±2.8
mL · min-1 · kg-1, the dyspnea
score to 15.7±2.3, the fatigue score to 14.8±3.4, the pulmonary
wedge
pressure to 28±11 mm Hg, and the pulmonary artery lactate
concentration to 34.5±16.3 mg/dL and decreased the pulmonary artery
hemoglobin oxygen saturation to 30±9%. The level of perceived dyspnea
had no relation to the pulmonary wedge pressure and correlated only
minimally with the level of excessive ventilation (r=.39).
The level of perceived fatigue correlated only weakly with blood
lactate concentration (r=.55). Eleven patients (21%)
exhibited a normal cardiac output and wedge pressure <20 mm Hg during
exercise, 22 (42%) exhibited a normal cardiac output but wedge
pressure >20 mm Hg during exercise, and 19 (37%) exhibited reduced
cardiac output and wedge pressure >20 mm Hg during exercise. Despite
these markedly different hemodynamic responses, all three groups
exhibited similar levels of fatigue and dyspnea at comparable workloads
and had comparable total scores for the Minnesota Living With Heart
Failure Questionnaire and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue Index. There was no
relation between the Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and peak
exercise
O2 and only a weak
correlation between the Dyspnea-Fatigue Index and peak
O2 (r=.48).
Conclusions The level of exercise intolerance perceived by patients with heart failure has little or no relation to objective measures of circulatory, ventilatory, or metabolic dysfunction during exercise. In patients who report severe exertional symptoms, it may be desirable to directly measure hemodynamic response to exercise to ensure that these symptoms are due to circulatory dysfunction.
Key Words: heart failure transplantation exercise
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At present, this exercise intolerance is usually attributed to circulatory dysfunction, since patients with heart failure often exhibit abnormal cardiac output and pulmonary wedge pressure responses to exercise.1 2 3 This assumption in turn has led most physicians to treat exertional dyspnea and fatigue primarily with cardiovascular medications in patients with heart failure. This assumption has also led to the widespread use of serial exercise testing and serial assessment of exertional symptoms to determine the efficacy of new treatments for heart failure.
Recently, however, there has been increasing evidence that exercise
intolerance in heart failure is not solely due to circulatory factors.
For example, several groups have shown that exercise training can
improve exertional symptoms in patients with heart failure without
changing hemodynamic function.4 5 We have shown that
at
least a quarter of patients with exertional fatigue exhibit normal leg
blood flow responses to exercise, suggesting that inadequate flow is
not responsible for their fatigue.6 There is also evidence
that patients' perceived exertional symptoms may not reflect their
actual exercise ability; Smith et al7 noted only a weak
relation between peak exercise
O2 and
New York Heart Association functional class in patients with heart
failure.
The present study was undertaken to systematically investigate the relation between exertional symptoms and circulatory function in ambulatory patients with heart failure. To this end, we monitored hemodynamic responses to maximal treadmill exercise in patients and concurrently asked the patients to quantify their level of exertional fatigue and dyspnea according to the Borg scale, a standardized scoring system.8 We then examined the relation between the level of circulatory dysfunction and symptom scores. In addition, we examined the relation between hemodynamic function and patients' perceived functional intolerance during normal daily activities, as assessed with the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue Index.9 10 11
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protocol
Patients underwent Swan-Ganz catheterization with
exercise as
part of their clinical evaluation. Before catheterization, all patients
had performed at least one cardiopulmonary exercise test and therefore
were familiar with treadmill exercise and respiratory gas
analysis.
On the day of the catheterization, patients fasted for at least 3 hours before presenting to a special procedure room. All medications were continued except for diuretics; these were withheld the morning of the study. On arrival, the patients were given two questionnaires to evaluate their functional limitation: the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue Index.9 10 11
The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire consists of 21 questions, each of which assesses the patient's perception of how his or her emotional and physical state is impaired by heart failure. The answer to each question ranges from a score of 0 (no impairment) to 5 (very much impaired), so that the total score can range from 0 to 105. The higher the score, the more severe the impairment. Questions 2 (rest during the day), 3 (walking and climbing stairs), 4 (working around the house), 5 (going away from home), 6 (sleeping), 7 (doing things with others), 12 (dyspnea), and 13 (fatigue) focus primarily on physical limitations and therefore were combined to obtain a physical limitation score. Questions 17 (feeling burdensome), 18 (feeling a loss of self-control), 19 (worry), 20 (difficulty concentrating and remembering), and 21 (feeling depressed) focus primarily on emotional limitations and therefore were combined to obtain an emotional limitation score.
The Dyspnea-Fatigue Index uses a scale of 0 to 4 to assess the magnitude of task that produces dyspnea and/or fatigue (0, symptomatic at rest; 4, symptomatic only with extraordinary activity), the pace of task that produces dyspnea and/or fatigue (0, symptomatic at rest; 4, all activities performed at normal pace), and the level of functional impairment (0, very severe; 4, none). Therefore, the composite index can range from 0 (severely limited) to 12 (no limitation).
After the patient completed the questionnaires, a 7F Swan-Ganz catheter was inserted via the right internal jugular vein. The patient was allowed to recover for 20 to 30 minutes, after which resting hemodynamic measurements were made, including pulmonary artery, pulmonary wedge, and right atrial pressures. Thermodilution cardiac outputs were measured in triplicate by injection of 10-mL boluses of iced saline and an Edwards thermodilution computer. Arterial blood pressure was measured by cuff sphygmomanometry. Pulmonary artery blood samples were obtained for lactate and hemoglobin O2 saturation.
The patient then stood on a Marquette treadmill and was connected to a MedGraphics CardioO2 System via a disposable pneumotach. The patient was also attached to a pulse oximeter via a device on the finger to noninvasively measure arterial oxygen saturation. Hemodynamic measurements and blood sampling were repeated. After 3 minutes of resting data acquisition, maximum symptom-limited exercise testing was performed according to a 3-minute Naughton protocol. At the end of each exercise stage and at peak exercise, hemodynamic measurements and blood sampling were repeated. Arterial hemoglobin O2 saturation was monitored continuously via the pulse oximeter. In addition, the patient was asked to rate the level of dyspnea and leg fatigue by the Borg scale.8 This scale rates the level of perceived symptoms on a scale of 6 (none) to 20 (severe). After exercise, the Swan-Ganz catheter was removed and the patient was discharged home.
From the results of this study, each patient's hemodynamic response to exercise was classified as mild, moderate, or severe hemodynamic dysfunction. Patients with normal cardiac output responses to exercise and pulmonary wedge pressures that never exceeded 20 mm Hg during exercise were considered to have mild hemodynamic dysfunction. Patients with normal cardiac output responses to exercise but pulmonary wedge pressures that exceeded 20 mm Hg during exercise were considered to have moderate hemodynamic dysfunction. Patients with low cardiac output responses to exercise and pulmonary wedge pressures >20 mm Hg during exercise were considered to have severe hemodynamic dysfunction.
A
reduced cardiac output response to exercise was defined as a
cardiac output (L/min)
<0.5x
O2+3
L/min. This lower limit was based on the studies of Higginbotham et
al12 but was consistent with the results of Damato et
al13 and Becklake et al.14
To assess lactate
responses to exercise, the anaerobic
threshold was defined as the
O2 level
at which lactate increased by 5 mg/dL over resting levels.
Derived Variables
Mean arterial blood pressure was calculated
as the diastolic
pressure plus one third of the pulse pressure. Arteriovenous
O2 difference was calculated as (hemoglobin
concentrationx1.34 mL O2/g
hemoglobin)x(arterialpulmonary artery hemoglobin oxygen
saturation).
Arterial oxygen saturation was measured noninvasively with the pulse
oximeter. Fick cardiac output was calculated as the oxygen consumption
divided by the arteriovenous O2 difference. Thermodilution
cardiac output was measured at rest, whereas only Fick cardiac output
was measured in the upright position and during exercise.
The degree to
which minute ventilation (VE) during exercise exceeded
normal ventilatory levels was calculated as measured VEx100%/normal
ventilation. The normal ventilatory level was calculated as
23.9x
CO2+12.6
L/min. This is the
upper limit of normal (2 SEM above the average ventilation) calculated
by Jones et al15 in normal subjects.
Measured Variables
Hemoglobin O2 saturation was
measured with a
Ciba-Corning 2500 Co-Oximeter. Blood for lactate determination was
deproteinized with cold perchloric acid and assayed with a
spectrophotometric technique. Normal values at rest for this technique
are 3 to 12 mg/dL.
Data Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SD.
Differences between groups
were evaluated by ANOVA. Correlations between variables were assessed
by least-squares regression analysis. A value of P<.05
was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2 of 13.4±2.8
mL · min-1 · kg-1 and
increases in
pulmonary wedge pressure and lactate concentration. However, individual
patient hemodynamic responses varied widely. Eleven patients (21%)
exhibited mild hemodynamic dysfunction, or normal cardiac output
responses and wedge pressures <20 mm Hg at peak exercise. Twenty-two
patients (42%) exhibited moderate hemodynamic dysfunction, or
normal cardiac output responses but wedge pressures >20 mm Hg
during exercise. Only 19 patients (37%) exhibited severe hemodynamic
dysfunction, or both a reduced cardiac output and an
increase in wedge pressure >20 mm Hg during exercise.
Hemodynamic responses of these three groups are shown in Table
2
|
|
|
Despite these widely differing hemodynamic responses to exercise, peak
exercise
O2 was not
significantly
different in the three groups (Table 3
). Peak exercise
O2 averaged 14.0±3.8
mL · min-1 · kg-1 (range, 8.6
to
19.6) in the mild dysfunction group, 14.1±2.5
mL · min-1 · kg-1 (range, 8.6
to
17.8) in the moderate dysfunction group, and 12.3±2.1
mL · min-1 · kg-1 (range, 8.5
to
15.3) in the severe dysfunction group (P=NS).
|
Symptom responses to treadmill exercise for all 52 patients are
illustrated in Fig 2
. On average, patients reported very
similar levels of dyspnea and fatigue during treadmill exercise.
Symptom responses in the three hemodynamic subgroups are illustrated in
Fig 3
. Despite markedly different hemodynamic responses
to treadmill exercise, all three groups reported similar levels of
fatigue and dyspnea during treadmill exercise.
|
|
To determine whether the symptom of dyspnea was related to objective
measures of pulmonary dysfunction, the dyspnea score was correlated
with the pulmonary wedge pressure during exercise and with the degree
to which minute ventilation exceeded normal levels. There was no
relation between perceived dyspnea and the pulmonary wedge pressure
during exercise (Fig 4
). There was a very weak
correlation between the level of dyspnea and the degree to which minute
ventilation exceeded the normal level (r=.39,
P<.02) (Fig 4
). However, patients with comparable
levels of
perceived dyspnea exhibited ventilatory levels ranging from totally
normal to markedly abnormal.
|
To determine whether the sensation of fatigue correlated with a measure
of skeletal muscle activation, we correlated the fatigue score with
lactate concentration. There was a modest correlation between these two
variables (r=.55, P<.01) (Fig 4
).
However, the
relation between the level of fatigue and the lactate concentration
varied widely from patient to patient. Some patients reported severe
fatigue even though their blood lactate levels were unchanged from
resting levels. Other patients exhibited markedly elevated lactate
levels but denied any perception of fatigue. The fatigue score also
correlated modestly with pulmonary artery hemoglobin oxygen saturation
(r=.50, P<.01), but also with wide variability
among patients.
Questionnaires
The total score on the Minnesota Living With
Heart Failure
Questionnaire averaged 55±19 and ranged from 14 to 88. The
Dyspnea-Fatigue Index averaged 5.1±2.2 and ranged from 0 to 9.
There was no correlation between peak exercise
O2 and the total score of
the Living
With Heart Failure Questionnaire (Fig 5
). Peak exercise
O2 also did not correlate
with the
physical or emotional limitation score. There was a significant but
very weak correlation between peak exercise
O2 and the Dyspnea-Fatigue
Index (Fig 5
).
|
Questionnaire scores were also correlated
with the
anaerobic threshold, the
O2 level at which lactate
increased by
5 mg/dL over resting levels. Both the Dyspnea-Fatigue Index and the
composite score of the Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
correlated with the anaerobic threshold (Fig 5
). However,
the degree of correlation was extremely weak.
There was no correlation between any questionnaire score and either the peak exercise cardiac index or peak exercise pulmonary wedge pressure. In addition, despite markedly different hemodynamic responses to exercise, the three hemodynamic groups exhibited similar composite scores for the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (mild, 50±26; moderate, 60±13; severe, 52±21) and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue Index (mild, 4.3±2.7; moderate, 5.3±1.9; severe, 5.5±2.3) (all P=NS).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The link between exertional symptoms and hemodynamic function, however,
has never been systematically examined in patients with heart failure.
Previous studies have demonstrated that peak exercise
O2 correlates weakly, if at
all, with
ejection fraction in such patients, leading to the general recognition
that systolic cardiac function is not a key determinant of exercise
capacity.3 7 16 Prior studies have also
demonstrated that
peak exercise
O2 does not
correlate
closely with New York Heart Association functional class or results of
quality-of-life questionnaires,3 7 suggesting that a
patient's maximal exercise capacity does not necessarily indicate
symptom status during normal daily activities. However, it
remains unclear whether the symptoms experienced by a patient at a
given work level are related to the degree of cardiac output reduction
or the level of intrapulmonary pressure elevation. It is also unclear
whether the level of fatigue or dyspnea reported by patients correlates
with objective indexes of muscle and lung dysfunction.
The present study was undertaken to investigate both these issues. First, we examined the relation between symptoms and the level of hemodynamic dysfunction. Exertional symptoms were measured by patients' rating of the level of dyspnea and fatigue during treadmill exercise according to a standardized scoring system called the Borg scale.8 Each patient also completed two questionnairesthe Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Dyspnea-Fatigue Indexto assess exercise intolerance during normal daily activities.9 10 11
Our second objective was to examine the relation between symptoms and objective measures of lung and skeletal muscle dysfunction. Specifically, we sought to determine whether patients who report exertional dyspnea exhibit objective evidence of pulmonary dysfunction such as elevated pulmonary wedge pressure and excessive ventilatory levels. To determine whether the presence of fatigue is accompanied by objective signs of skeletal muscle dysfunction, the level of leg fatigue was correlated with blood lactate concentration.
Hemodynamic Responses to Exercise and Exertional Symptoms
As
a group, patients in this study exhibited hemodynamic and
metabolic responses to exercise comparable to those of previous
studies, including reduced peak exercise
O2, elevated pulmonary
wedge
pressure, and increased lactate
levels.1 2 3 However,
individual responses to exercise varied widely. Eleven of the patients,
or 21% of the group, exhibited cardiac output responses to exercise
within the normal range and had pulmonary wedge pressures that remained
below 20 mm Hg, consistent with mild hemodynamic dysfunction.
Forty-two percent of the patients had normal cardiac output responses
to exercise but pulmonary wedge pressures >20 mm Hg, consistent with
moderate hemodynamic dysfunction. Only 19 of the patients, or 37%,
exhibited both reduced cardiac outputs and wedge pressures >20 mm Hg,
a response assumed to be characteristic of patients with heart
failure.
Despite these markedly different hemodynamic responses, all
three
groups exhibited similar symptom profiles. As illustrated in Fig
3
, the
level of dyspnea and fatigue were nearly identical in the three groups
during treadmill exercise. Patients in the three groups also reported
similar levels of exertional symptoms on the Living With Heart Failure
Questionnaire and the Dyspnea/Fatigue Questionnaire.
These observations strongly suggest that the level of exertional symptoms reported by patients with heart failure does not reflect the level of hemodynamic dysfunction. This finding is not particularly surprising. Exercise physiologists have long been aware that exertional symptoms are influenced by multiple factors in addition to cardiac function, such as musculoskeletal status, body composition, motivation, and tolerance of discomfort. For example, individuals who are obese are likely to experience more symptoms than patients who are not obese. Symptoms during daily activities can be controlled by avoiding certain activities and by reducing the pace of the activities.
One noncardiac factor that may be particularly important in patients with heart failure is skeletal muscle deconditioning. A number of recent studies have shown that patients with heart failure develop skeletal muscle changes consistent with muscle deconditioning and exhibit improved exercise capacity with exercise training.4 5 It seems likely that muscle deconditioning contributed to the exercise intolerance of many of the patients in this study, particularly the patients with mild and moderate hemodynamic dysfunction who exhibited early increases in lactate levels despite normal cardiac output responses to exercise.
Relation Between Symptoms, Ventilation, and Metabolism
Our
data further suggest that the exertional symptoms reported by
patients also do not reflect the severity of skeletal muscle or lung
dysfunction. During treadmill exercise, the levels of dyspnea had no
relation to the pulmonary wedge pressure. Patients with totally
normal pulmonary wedge pressures reported as much dyspnea as patients
with markedly elevated wedge pressures. The level of excessive
ventilation had only a very weak relation to the presence of
dyspnea.
The presence of fatigue was only weakly related to the level of blood lactate. The accumulation of lactate in skeletal muscle is probably not responsible for the development of muscle fatigue17 18 but empirically provides an objective marker of skeletal muscle fatigue. A number of patients reported severe leg fatigue with virtually no increase in blood lactate levels, whereas other patients denied any fatigue despite markedly elevated levels.
Further evidence that the
symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue do not
reflect specific abnormalities of the lungs and skeletal muscle comes
from the close relation between these two symptoms during exercise. As
noted in Fig 2
, most patients reported nearly identical levels
of
dyspnea and fatigue at each workload, suggesting that these two
symptoms are interrelated and may reflect primarily the perceived
intensity of exercise rather than specific abnormalities of a
particular organ system. Interestingly, normal subjects also report
similar levels of dyspnea and fatigue during
exercise.19
The lack of a relation between particular symptoms and objective evidence of lung and skeletal muscle dysfunction has previously been noted by Sullivan et al.20 These investigators measured hemodynamic, ventilatory, and lactate responses to bicycle exercise in a group of patients and, at peak exercise, asked them to indicate whether they were limited primarily by fatigue or dyspnea. Our experience is that this is a somewhat misleading question, since patients report similar levels of both symptoms and will only reluctantly pick one symptom as more severe. Nevertheless, Sullivan et al noted that the limiting symptom had no relation to the level of lung or skeletal muscle dysfunction. For example, patients who were limited primarily by dyspnea had ventilatory levels similar to those of patients limited by fatigue.
In a study specifically designed to examine the link between dyspnea and lung function, Mancini et al21 also observed no relation between ventilatory levels and dyspnea. However, they did note that the level of dyspnea reported by patients at a given workload correlated modestly with maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, FEV1, and the tension-time index, a measure of lung work. They interpreted these findings as evidence that the sensation of dyspnea is related to respiratory muscle function. However, as in the present study, they noted that patients reported nearly identical symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea during exercise, making it likely that these symptoms are interrelated and that dyspnea is not a specific indicator of lung dysfunction.
Clinical Implications
Results of this study have several
major clinical implications.
First, our findings suggest that physicians should no longer assume
that exertional symptoms in patients with heart failure indicate pump
dysfunction and therefore should no longer rely solely on
pharmaceutical interventions to treat these symptoms. The possibility
that exertional symptoms are related to muscle deconditioning, obesity,
and other noncardiac factors should be considered. If necessary, direct
hemodynamic monitoring during exercise should be used to interpret
exertional symptoms.
Conversely, the absence of exertional symptoms should not be considered definite evidence that cardiac pump function is preserved. In this study, several patients with severe hemodynamic dysfunction during exercise and severe exercise impairment denied significant exertional symptoms. Such patients should probably be considered for heart transplantation on the basis of a poor long-term prognosis.16 22 23 Such patients are probably best detected by maximal exercise testing.
Our findings further suggest that pharmaceutical companies and the Food and Drug Administration should reconsider the way new drugs are evaluated in heart failure. The typical method used to assess new drugs is to conduct a randomized, double-blind study in a broad range of patients. These patients are usually selected by their demonstrating reduced exercise capacity with some type of exercise test, either maximal or submaximal. No attempt is made to clarify the reason for exercise intolerance or the presence of pump dysfunction. Our findings suggest that this approach results in the enrollment of many patients with little or no hemodynamic dysfunction. Inclusion of such patients will make it more difficult to prove the efficacy of a drug. A more appropriate method of detecting drug efficacy might be to evaluate hemodynamic responses to exercise in all patients being considered for study and then to include only patients with significant hemodynamic dysfunction.
Ideally, such an approach would reduce the number of patients required in studies and improve the detection of effective agents. It should be emphasized, however, that this approach is not necessarily superior. Prior studies suggest that acute hemodynamic responses to pharmacological agents do not predict long-term changes in exercise capacity.24 On the basis of this finding, use of invasive hemodynamic measurements to guide therapeutic interventions has been largely abandoned. This decision to ignore hemodynamic parameters may have been premature, however. The value of using hemodynamic measurements to select patients for therapeutic trials has never been directly evaluated. Moreover, the conclusion that changes in hemodynamic parameters do not predict long-term response is based primarily on retrospective analyses of data drawn from multiple interventional trials.24 The value of using hemodynamic measurements to guide therapeutic interventions still needs to be prospectively tested.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 18, 1995; revision received March 1, 1995; accepted March 5, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. R. Middlekauff, J. Chiu, M. A. Hamilton, G. C. Fonarow, W. R. MacLellan, A. Hage, J. Moriguchi, and J. Patel Cyclooxygenase products sensitize muscle mechanoreceptors in humans with heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1956 - H1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Borlaug, V. Melenovsky, S. D. Russell, K. Kessler, K. Pacak, L. C. Becker, and D. A. Kass Impaired Chronotropic and Vasodilator Reserves Limit Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure and a Preserved Ejection Fraction Circulation, November 14, 2006; 114(20): 2138 - 2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Lunde, O. M. Sejersted, H.-M. S. Thorud, T. Tonnessen, U. L. Henriksen, G. Christensen, H. Westerblad, and J. Bruton Effects of Congestive Heart Failure on Ca2+ Handling in Skeletal Muscle During Fatigue Circ. Res., June 23, 2006; 98(12): 1514 - 1519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Rosen, K. Murphy, A. P. Leff, V. Cunningham, R. J.S. Wise, L. Adams, A. J.S. Coats, and P. G. Camici Is central nervous system processing altered in patients with heart failure? Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2004; 25(11): 952 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kawaguchi, I. Hay, B. Fetics, and D. A. Kass Combined Ventricular Systolic and Arterial Stiffening in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Implications for Systolic and Diastolic Reserve Limitations Circulation, February 11, 2003; 107(5): 714 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. I. Parthenakis, M. K. Kanakaraki, E. M. Kanoupakis, E. I. Skalidis, G. F. Diakakis, O. K. Filippou, and P. E. Vardas Value of Doppler Index Combining Systolic and Diastolic Myocardial Performance in Predicting Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure* : Effects of Dobutamine Chest, June 1, 2002; 121(6): 1935 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Wisloff, J. P. Loennechen, S. Currie, G. L. Smith, and O. Ellingsen Aerobic exercise reduces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and increases contractility, Ca2+ sensitivity and SERCA-2 in rat after myocardial infarction Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2002; 54(1): 162 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. de Jonge, H. Kirkels, J. R. Lahpor, C. Klopping, E. J. Hulzebos, A. Brutel de la Riviere, and E. O. Robles de Medina Exercise performance in patients with end-stage heart failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device and after heart transplantation: An outlook for permanent assisting? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1794 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Recommendations for exercise training in chronic heart failure patients Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2001; 22(2): 125 - 135. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Nieuwland, M. A. Berkhuysen, D. J. van Veldhuisen, J. Brugemann, M. L. J. Landsman, E. van Sonderen, K. I. Lie, H. J. G. M. Crijns, and P. Rispens Differential effects of high-frequency versus low-frequency exercise training in rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 202 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J Wright and L B Tan Classic techniques in medicine: The role of exercise testing in the evaluation and management of heart failure Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 1999; 75(886): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ramos-Barbon, D. Fitchett, W. J. Gibbons, D. A. Latter, and R. D. Levy Maximal Exercise Testing for the Selection of Heart Transplantation Candidates: Limitation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Chest, February 1, 1999; 115(2): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P Wielenga, A. J S Coats, W. L Mosterd, and I. A Huisveld The role of exercise training in chronic heart failure Heart, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 431 - 436. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mancini, S. Katz, L. Donchez, and K. Aaronson Coupling of Hemodynamic Measurements With Oxygen Consumption During Exercise Does Not Improve Risk Stratification in Patients With Heart Failure Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2492 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
CHF Symptoms May Not Be Related to Pump Function Journal Watch Cardiology, August 1, 1995; 1995(801): 4 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |