Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:2969-2974

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filep, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Szegedi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filep, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Szegedi, G.

(Circulation. 1995;92:2969-2974.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Plasma Endothelin Correlates With Antiendothelial Antibodies in Patients With Mixed Connective Tissue Disease

János G. Filep, MD; Edit Bodolay, MD; Sándor Sipka, MD; Edit Gyimesi, PhD; István Csipö, PhD; Gyula Szegedi, MD, DMSc

From the Research Center (J.G.F.), Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; and Third Department of Medicine (E.B., S.S., E.G., I.C., G.S.), Debrecen University Medical School, Debrecen, Hungary.

Correspondence to János G. Filep, MD, Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montréal, 5415 Boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H1T 2M4.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Elevated circulating levels of the vasoactive peptide endothelin-1 have been reported in various cardiovascular disorders. Because these conditions are frequently associated with endothelial dysfunction and damage and the vasoconstrictor effect of endothelin-1 is believed to be produced at the local vascular level, it is uncertain whether circulating endothelin-1 is a causal factor in enhanced vascular tone or instead a marker of endothelial injury.

Methods and Results We tested whether elevated immunoreactive endothelin-1 could be detected by radioimmunoassay in plasma and whether endothelin-1 levels correlated with antiendothelial autoantibodies in patients with mixed connective tissue disease. Venous blood samples were collected from 21 patients in the morning after an overnight fast and before medication. The plasma immunoreactive endothelin-1 level was 2.7±0.5 pg/mL (range, 1.1 to 5.2 pg/ml; n=9) and 7.3±1.5 pg/mL (range, 2.8 to 20.7 pg/mL; n=12) in patients who had no antiendothelial antibodies and in patients with antiendothelial antibodies, respectively. These latter values were significantly (P<.001) increased compared with 10 age-matched healthy volunteers (2.0±0.3 pg/mL; range, 0.5 to 3.0 pg/mL). Plasma endothelin-1 level strongly correlated with antiendothelial antibodies (rs=.836, n=21, P<.001), whereas there was no correlation between age, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, antinuclear antibodies, and duration of the disease and endothelin-1 values. The incidence of Raynaud's phenomenon and angina did not differ significantly in patients with low and high endothelin-1 levels.

Conclusions This study showed that mixed connective tissue disease is associated with elevated plasma immunoreactive endothelin-1 and that endothelin-1 levels significantly correlate with antiendothelial autoantibodies. These findings suggest that increases in plasma endothelin-1 concentration may be secondary to vascular injury and do not necessarily represent enhanced susceptibility to vasoconstriction.


Key Words: endothelin • antibodies • endothelium


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Endothelin-1 is a member of a family of potent vasoactive peptides1 with wide range of biological activities.2 3 Numerous pharmacological studies demonstrating its potent long-lasting vasoconstrictor and pressor activities2 3 have led to the concept that endothelin-1 plays an important pathophysiological role in local and systemic vasoconstriction. Elevated circulating levels of endothelin-1 have been detected in various cardiovascular disorders, including ischemic heart disease,4 5 essential hypertension,6 pulmonary hypertension,7 8 and cardiogenic9 and endotoxic shock.10 These pathologies are frequently associated with endothelial dysfunction and/or damage.11 12 13 14 Because endothelial cells respond to injury by altering the expression of various genes, including the endothelin-1 gene, with subsequent alterations in mediator generation,15 it is still uncertain whether endothelin-1 is a causal factor in vasoconstriction or instead a marker of endothelial injury. Moreover, markedly high endothelin-1 levels have been reported in some rheumatic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus16 17 and primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon,17 18 19 in which autoimmune mechanisms are believed to be responsible for the vascular damage. The overlapping form of rheumatic diseases, called mixed connective tissue disease, is characterized by high levels of circulating autoantibodies and by a diffuse proliferative intimal and/or medial vascular lesion, resulting in narrowing of the lumen of small vessels as well as of medium-size arteries of many organs.20 In the present study, we investigated whether the presence of antiendothelial autoantibodies is associated with elevated plasma levels of endothelin-1 in patients with mixed connective tissue disease.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Population
We studied 21 white patients with mixed connective tissue disease who visited our ambulatory clinic for regular follow-up examinations between September 1993 and November 1993. During their treatment by us, all patients fulfilled at least once the preliminary criteria for mixed connective tissue disease introduced by the 1986 International Symposium on Mixed Connective Tissue Disease and Antinuclear Antibodies20 based on the original description of Sharp et al.21 Major criteria included myositis, pulmonary involvement, Raynaud's phenomenon, swollen hands or sclerodactyly, and antibodies against a nuclear ribonucleoprotein (anti-RNP). None of the patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus22 (Table 1Down), Sjögren's syndrome (absence of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and xerostomia), or systemic sclerosis23 (absence of proximal scleroderma, digital ulceration or scars, loss of substance of the distal finger pad, and bibasilar pulmonary fibrosis in patients with sclerodactyly). In addition, the patients' sera did not contain autoantibodies against DNA topoisomerase I (scl 70) and centromere, which are characteristic of diffuse scleroderma and the limited form of scleroderma (CREST syndrome), respectively.24 None of the patients had Wegener's granulomatosis or polyarteritis nodosa. The patients were divided into those who had no antiendothelial antibodies in the plasma (group 1) and those who had antiendothelial antibodies (group 2). Patient characteristics are given in Table 1Down. Seven patients in group 2 who showed signs of exacerbation of arthritis and myositis with concomitant increases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum creatine kinase level were considered to have a more active stage of the disease (Table 2Down). Duration of disease (in years) was measured from onset of symptoms. Disease activity parameters were stable at the time of the study. Sixteen patients were undergoing low-dose steroid therapy and 14 were taking calcium channel blockers for symptomatic treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon. Patients who were taking more than 5 mg/d prednisolone were excluded from the study. Ten healthy female volunteers (mean age, 36 years; range, 28 to 48 years) constituted the control group. Blood samples were collected in the morning after an overnight fast and before medication. Blood was drawn from the antecubital vein into prechilled tubes containing EDTA and was immediately centrifuged at 1600g for 20 min, and plasma was frozen and stored at -80°C until assay. To assess vascular lesions, a biopsy from the affected skin areas was also performed. Conventional light microscopic analysis of the biopsy specimens, fixed in formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, was done by an observer unaware of the patients' clinical condition. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and volunteers before participation in the study, and the protocol was approved by the institutional committee on human subjects and research.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients With Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Without (Group 1) and With Plasma Antiendothelial Antibodies (Group 2)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of Group 2 Patients With a Clinically Less Active (Group 2a) and a More Active Stage (Group 2b) of the Disease1

Measurement of Antinuclear and Antiendothelial Autoantibodies
Plasma concentrations of antibodies against a nuclear ribonucleoprotein (anti-RNP), against a protein complexed to Y1Y5 RNA (anti-SSA), and against a phosphoprotein complexed with RNA pol III transcripts (anti-SSB) were determined by an indirect ELISA method with commercial immunowell kits (General Biometrics Inc) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol.

Plasma levels of antiendothelial cell autoantibodies were determined by a cellular ELISA with cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells according to the method of Frampton et al.25 In brief, endothelial cells harvested from human umbilical cord veins with 0.2% collagenase were grown in Dulbecco's complete medium26 supplemented with 30 µg/mL endothelial cell growth factor (Sigma Chemical Co) and 10 units/mL heparin (Leo Laboratories). Second-passage endothelial cells were seeded at 2x104 in 100 µL on sterile 96-well microtiter plates (Costar) precoated with 100 µL of 1% gelatin. The identity of endothelial cells was verified by morphology and by immunofluorescence staining using a rabbit anti-human factor VIII antigen antibody (Behring). After 48 hours of culture, the plates were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (0.15 mol/L, pH 7.4), fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde for 15 minutes at 22°C, washed twice with PBS containing 0.2% BSA, and then incubated with PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.1 mol/L glycine for 1 hour at 22°C to block nonspecific binding of immunoglobulins. After three washes, 100 µL of test or reference samples diluted 1:20 was added to each well in triplicate and incubated for 2 hours at 22°C. After three washes, 100 µL of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG F(ab')2 antibody and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgM antibody (Cappel Laboratories) diluted 1:500 in PBS containing 2% BSA was added to each well for an additional 2 hours at 22°C. After three washes, 100 µL of 4 mmol/L O-phenylene diamine dihydrochloride (Sigma Chemical Co) and 1.3 mmol/L hydrogen peroxide in 0.1 mol/L citrate buffer, pH 5.0, was added to each well for 20 minutes at 22°C. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 100 µL of 2 mol/L sulfuric acid, and the optical density was measured at 492 nm in a microplate reader. Two positive and two negative control sera were included on each plate. Samples were considered positive for antiendothelial antibodies if test values were greater than the mean+2 SD value of 23 healthy subjects. The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 5% and 9%, respectively.

Measurement of Plasma Endothelin-1
Plasma endothelin was extracted with the use of octadecyl silica cartridges (Sep Pak, Waters) and immunoreactive endothelin-1 concentrations were measured with a double-antibody radioimmunoassay kit (Peninsula Laboratories) as described previously.27 The extraction procedure yielded a recovery of 62±3% as assayed by calculating the recovery of exogenous endothelin-1, which had been added to the plasma. The values reported in the present study should be considered immunoreactive endothelin-1 as the antiserum exhibited a cross-reactivity of 17% for human big endothelin-1 and 7% for endothelin-2 and endothelin-3 but no cross-reactivity with unrelated peptides (angiotensin I and II, vasopressin, and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides). The detection limit of the assay was 0.1 pg per tube. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 4% at the midpoint (2.2 pg per tube) of the standard curve. Dilution curves of known endothelin-1 concentrations added to plasma were parallel to the standard curve, which suggested an absence of interfering substances in the plasma samples. All endothelin-1 values were corrected for recovery and expressed as picograms per milliliter plasma.

Statistical Analysis
Group values are presented as mean±SEM. The occurrence of clinical features in patients with and without antiendothelial antibodies was compared with the use of Fisher's exact test. Plasma endothelin-1 levels in healthy volunteers and in the two groups of patients were compared by one-way ANOVA using ranks (Kruskal-Wallis test) followed by Dunn's multiple-contrast hypothesis test to identify differences between groups. Comparison of systolic and diastolic blood pressures and anti-RNP antibody in the two groups of patients was made with two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. To identify relevant relations, regression analysis of age, blood pressure, and antinuclear or antiendothelial autoantibodies with plasma endothelin-1 was performed by calculating Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (rs). Where appropriate, polynomial regression was also performed. A value of P<.05 was considered significant for all tests.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Healthy Subjects
The control group consisted of 10 women. Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 123±3 and 79±3 mm Hg, respectively. In healthy subjects, the plasma endothelin-1 level was 2.0±0.3 pg/mL (range, 0.5 to 3.0 pg/mL) (Fig 1Down).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Scatterplot of venous plasma levels of immunoreactive endothelin-1 (ET-1) in healthy age-matched volunteers (control) and in patients with mixed connective tissue disease without antiendothelial antibodies (group I) and with antiendothelial antibodies (group II). Group mean values are indicated by dotted lines. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that variation among group medians is significantly (P<.0002) greater than expected by chance. P values were obtained by Dunn's multiple-contrast hypothesis test using ranks.

Patients With Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
The characteristics of patients in each group are given in Table 1Up. No significant differences could be detected in these parameters with the exception that group 1 contained one male patient. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that variation in age and systolic and diastolic blood pressures among medians of control subjects and patients in groups 1 and 2 was not significantly greater (P>.06) than expected by chance.

Increased circulating levels of immunoreactive endothelin-1 were present in most patients with mixed connective tissue disease. The plasma endothelin-1 level was on average 41% higher in patients who had no antiendothelial antibodies than in control subjects, whereas the mean value of plasma endothelin-1 was more than threefold the control level in patients with antiendothelial autoantibodies (Fig 1Up). The range of values demonstrated minimal overlap between these two populations (Fig 1Up). There was no correlation between age, systolic or diastolic blood pressures, and endothelin-1 values for either healthy subjects (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were -.201, .346, and .398, respectively; n=10, P>.2 for each correlation) or patients with mixed connective tissue disease (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were -.103, .238, and .230, respectively; n=21, P>.2 for each correlation). Furthermore, plasma endothelin-1 levels correlated with neither the duration of the disease (rs=.1734, n=21, P>.45) or the duration from the first observation of Raynaud's phenomenon (rs=.3041, n=14, P>.29). The Spearman correlation analysis revealed a highly significant, positive correlation of endothelin-1 with antiendothelial autoantibodies in patients with mixed connective tissue disease (rs=.831, 95% confidence limit of .614 to .931, n=21, P<.001). Although significant by either linear or polynomial regression analysis, endothelin-1 levels were best described by nonlinear polynomial regression (Fig 2Down). The index of determination (r2) indicated that at least 61% of the variability of plasma endothelin-1 level was related to the variability of plasma antiendothelial autoantibodies. No significant correlations could be detected between plasma levels of endothelin-1 and anti-RNP antibodies (rs=.328, n=21, P>.14) and between endothelin-1 concentrations and occurrence of anti-SSA or anti-SSB autoantibodies in patients with or without antiendothelial autoantibodies.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Plot of correlation of venous plasma immunoreactive endothelin-1 (ET-1) with antiendothelial autoantibodies in patients with mixed connective tissue disease without (group I) and with antiendothelial autoantibodies (group II). Plasma levels of antiendothelial autoantibodies were determined by a cellular ELISA with cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Patients were considered positive for antiendothelial autoantibodies if test values were greater than the mean +2 SD value of 23 healthy subjects (dotted line). The best fit of these data was by a polynomial equation, although linear regression (y=27.45x-2.69) was similarly highly significant (r=.76, r2=.57, P<.0001) and no significant (P>.93) departure from linearity was detected by the Runs test. Index of determination (r2=.61) indicates that the variabilities of plasma endothelin-1 and antiendothelial antibodies are highly interdependent.

Patients in group 2 were divided into two subgroups, with group 2b consisting of patients considered to have a more active stage of the disease (Table 2Up). There were no significant differences in age, duration of the disease, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and plasma levels of anti-RNP autoantibodies between these two subgroups of patients. On the other hand, plasma concentrations of both antiendothelial antibodies and endothelin-1 were significantly higher in patients with a more active stage of the disease (Table 2Up). The prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon and vascular lesions did not differ significantly between the two subgroups (Table 2Up). Histological evaluation of skin biopsy specimens showed the presence of vascular damage characterized by intimal proliferation and medial hypertrophy in venules and arterioles without fibrosis, occasional extravasation of erythrocytes, and infiltration of perivascular area and, less often, the vessel wall by mononuclear cells. Leukocytoclastic infiltration was observed only in three patients of group 2b (Table 2Up).

To assess further the possible association of plasma endothelin-1 with Raynaud's phenomenon, plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were compared in group 2 patients with or without Raynaud's phenomenon. Plasma endothelin-1 levels of patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (8.8±2.5 pg/mL; range, 3.7 to 20.7 pg/mL; n=6) did not differ significantly (P=.39, Mann-Whitney U test) from those detected in patients who do not have Raynaud's phenomenon (5.8±1.4 pg/mL; range, 2.8 to 11.4 pg/mL; n=6).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present study, patients with mixed connective tissue disease with antiendothelial antibodies were found to have a mean peripheral venous plasma endothelin-1 concentration three times higher than that of age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. The normal values in our study are consistent with previously published values.4 5 6 7 8 9 It should, however, be noted that the antibody used in our assay cross-reacts with the precursor of endothelin-1, big endothelin-1, endothelin-2, and endothelin-3. The contribution of these two latter endothelins to the immunoreactivity is negligible as endothelin-2 has not been found to circulate in humans2 3 28 and the plasma level of endothelin-3 is less than one half of that of endothelin-1.28 The molar ratio of big endothelin-1 to endothelin-1 is {approx}1 in the plasma of healthy subjects.4 29 As big endothelin-1 is normally converted to the biologically active peptide endothelin-1, the assay would estimate both potential and actual endothelin-1 bioactivity. We cannot exclude the possibility that conversion of big endothelin-1 to endothelin-1 is impaired in mixed connective tissue disease. Consequently, the high plasma levels detected might reflect an increase mainly in big endothelin-1, rather than endothelin-1. However, there would have to be a very high increase in big endothelin-1 to account for a threefold increase in endothelin-1 immunoreactivity because the antibody used had only 17% cross-reactivity with big endothelin-1. Therefore, the raised level of immunoreactive endothelin-1 in our patients could be considered as a reflection of the biologically active peptide. The small amount of endothelin-1 in the plasma did not allow testing for bioactivity.

Our data demonstrate for the first time a strong positive correlation of plasma endothelin-1 concentrations with levels of antiendothelial antibodies in patients with immune-mediated vascular injury. The importance of this relation was identified by the Spearman nonparametric correlation analysis and polynomial regression analysis. In the latter analysis, the index of determination (r2) indicated that at least 61% of the variability in plasma endothelin-1 was related to the variability of plasma antiendothelial antibodies. The naturally occurring human antiendothelial antibodies are of the IgM class30 and in lesser extent of the IgG class.31 Because both IgG and IgM antibodies could be detected frequently in patients with systemic vasculitis,25 in the present study we measured the combined level of IgG plus IgM autoantibodies in each sample. Endothelial cells express immunogenic molecules of the class I (HLA-A, -B, and -C); class II (HLA-DR) major histocompatibility complex; the adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and PECAM; and a 60/62-kD doublet of unknown nature.31 No information is available at present whether the autoantibodies are directed against one or more of these molecules. Antiendothelial antibodies of the IgM class can be highly destructive and have been implicated in the rejection of porcine xenografts30 and in the development of transplant-associated coronary artery disease.31 The possibility that antiendothelial autoantibodies mediate vascular injury in mixed connective tissue disease is suggested, although far from confirmed, by the demonstration that these autoantibodies induce lysis of endothelial cells in vitro and by the observation that patients with an apparently more active stage of the disease had higher plasma levels of antiendothelial autoantibodies. In addition, leukocytoclasis, which is believed to be indicative for a more active stage of vasculitis, was detected in skin biopsies from only three of these patients. An alternative possibility might be that antiendothelial cell autoantibodies are produced against already damaged cells, and therefore they are markers rather than mediators of vascular damage. Consequently, the close correlation between plasma levels of antiendothelial antibodies and endothelin-1 would not reflect a casual relation but would indicate the usefulness of either antiendothelial autoantibodies or endothelin-1 as markers of vascular damage regardless of the damage-inducing mechanism(s). Although chronic endothelial stimulation (eg, mechanical forces or cytokines) and/or endothelial injury has been reported to enhance transcription of the endothelin-1 gene in endothelial cells,15 little is known about the underlying mechanisms.

If one assumes that immunoreactive endothelin-1 in our patients reflects biologically active endothelin-1, it would be important to know whether endothelin-1 actually contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease. A vasoconstrictor role for endothelin-1 remains uncertain because even the highest plasma levels of endothelin-1 we found in vasculitis patients were still below the threshold (10 pmol/L) for inducing contraction of isolated vascular rings1 or a systemic pressor response in humans.32 Furthermore, in view of the similarities in systemic and diastolic blood pressure values and in the incidence of Raynaud's phenomenon and angina in patients with low (group 1) and high (group 2) endothelin-1 levels coupled with the findings that plasma endothelin-1 levels do not differ significantly in patients of group 2 with and without Raynaud's phenomenon, it appears that elevations in plasma endothelin-1 do not necessarily reflect enhanced susceptibility to vasoconstriction, as suggested previously.18 Instead, elevated plasma endothelin-1 in our patients appears to be a marker of endothelial damage rather than a mediator of vasoconstriction. The findings that plasma endothelin-1 correlated with plasma von Willebrand factor, a known marker of endothelial damage,33 in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon19 lend further support to this notion. On the other hand, because release of endothelin-1 by endothelial cells is polarized toward the basolateral side,34 plasma levels of endothelin-1 may not correctly represent local production rate, and local concentrations of endothelin-1 might be much higher than those detected in the plasma. It is possible that by virtue of its mitogenic2 35 and vascular permeability–enhancing36 effects, endothelin-1 may contribute to proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and deposition of IgG and IgM within the vascular wall.20

In conclusion, we have shown that elevated plasma levels of immunoreactive endothelin-1 specifically correlate with antiendothelial antibodies in patients with mixed connective tissue disease. These findings suggest that increases in plasma endothelin-1 concentration may be secondary to vascular injury and do not necessarily represent enhanced susceptibility to vasoconstriction. Direct assessment of the functional importance of endothelin-1 in this disorder must await the use of orally active endothelin-1 receptor antagonists or inhibitors of its production.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada, the Foundation of the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, and the Hungarian National Foundation for Scientific Research. Dr Filep is a Senior Scholar of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ).

Received November 29, 1994; revision received May 31, 1995; accepted June 23, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411-415. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Simonson MS, Dunn MJ. The molecular mechanisms of cardiovascular and renal regulation by endothelin peptides. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;191:622-639.
  3. Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA. Endothelins: molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology and pathophysiology. Pharmacol Rev. 1994;46:328-415.
  4. Miyauchi T, Yanagisawa M, Tomizawa T, Sugishita Y, Suzuki N, Fujino M, Ajisaka R, Goto K, Masaki T. Increased plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 and big endothelin-1 in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1989;2:53-54. Letter. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Yasuda M, Kuhno M, Tahara A. Circulating immunoreactive endothelin in ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 1990;119:801-806. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Saito Y, Nakao K, Mukoyama M, Imura H. Increased plasma endothelin level in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1989;322:205. Letter. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Stewart DJ, Levy RD, Cernacek P, Langleben D. Increased plasma endothelin-1 in pulmonary hypertension: marker or mediator of disease? Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:464-469.
  8. Cody RJ, Haas GJ, Binkley PF, Capers Q, Kelley R. Plasma endothelin correlates with the extent of pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1992;85:504-509. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cernacek P, Stewart DJ. Immunoreactive endothelin in human plasma: marked elevations in patients with cardiogenic shock. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;161:562-567. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Weitzberg E, Lundberg JM, Rudehill A. Elevated plasma levels of endothelin in patients with sepsis syndrome. Circ Shock. 1991;33:222-227. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Drexler H, Zeiher AM, Woelschlager H, Meinertz T, Just H, Bonzee T. Flow-dependent coronary artery dilatation in humans. Circulation. 1989;80:466-474. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE Jr, Epstein SE. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1991;323:22-27. [Abstract]
  13. Newman JH, Ross JC. Primary pulmonary hypertension: a look at the future. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:551-555. [Abstract]
  14. Lefer AM, Tsao P, Lefer DJ, Ma XL. Role of endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of reperfusion injury after myocardial ischemia. FASEB J. 1991;5:2029-2034. [Abstract]
  15. Gerritsen ME, Bloor CM. Endothelial gene expression in response to injury. FASEB J. 1993;7:523-532. [Abstract]
  16. Julkunen H, Saijonmaa O, Grönhagen-Riska C, Teppo AM, Fyhrquist F. Raised plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:526-527. Letter.
  17. Ferri C, Latorraca A, Catapano G, Greco F, Mazzoni A, Clerico A, Pedrinelli R. Increased plasma endothelin-1 immunoreactive levels in vasculitis: a clue to the use of endothelin-1 as a marker of vascular damage? J Hypertens. 1993;11(suppl 5):S142-S143.
  18. Zamora MR, O'Brien RF, Rutherford RB, Weil JV. Serum endothelin-1 concentrations and cold provocation in primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Lancet. 1990;2:1144-1147.
  19. Cimminiello C, Milani M, Uberti T, Arpaia G, Perolini S, Bonfardeci G. Endothelin, vasoconstriction, and endothelial damage in Raynaud's phenomenon. Lancet. 1991;1:114-115. Letter.
  20. Sharp GC, Singsen BM. Mixed connective tissue disease. In: McCarty DJ, Koopman WJ, eds. Arthritis and Allied Conditions, 12th ed. Philadelphia, Pa/London, UK: Lea & Febiger; 1993:1213-1224.
  21. Sharp GC, Irvin WS, Tan EM, Gould RG, Holman HR. Mixed connective tissue disease: an apparently distinct rheumatic disease syndrome associated with a specific antibody to an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA). Am J Med. 1972;52:148-159. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Rothfield NF. Systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical aspects and treatment. In: McCarty DJ, Koopman WJ, eds. Arthritis and Allied Conditions, 12th ed. Philadelphia, Pa/London, UK: Lea & Febiger; 1993:1155-1177.
  23. Subcommittee for Scleroderma Criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee: Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthrit Rheum. 1980;23:581-590. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Reimer G. Autoantibodies against nuclear, nucleolar, and mitochondrial antigens in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990;16:169-183. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Frampton G, Jayne DRW, Perry GJ, Lockwood CM, Cameron JS. Autoantibodies to endothelial cells and neutrophil cytoplasmic antigens in systemic vasculitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1990;82:227-232. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins: identification by morphological and immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:2745-2756.
  27. Filep JG, Télémaque S, Battistini B, Sirois P, D'Orleans-Juste P. Increased plasma levels of endothelin during anaphylactic shock in the guinea-pig. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;239:231-236. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Matsumoto H, Suzuki N, Kitada C, Fujino M. Endothelin peptides in human plasma and urine: their molecular forms and concentrations. Peptides. 1994;15:505-510. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Löffler BM, Jacot-Guillarmod H, Maire JP. Concentrations and ratios of immunoreactive big-endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 in human, rat and rabbit. Biochem Int. 1992;27:755-761. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Auchincloss J Jr. Xenografting: a review. Transplant Rev. 1990;4:14-27.
  31. Dunn MJ, Crisp SJ, Rose ML, Taylor PM, Yacoub MH. Anti-endothelial antibodies and coronary artery disease after cardiac transplantation. Lancet. 1992;1:1566-1570.
  32. Vierhapper H, Wagner O, Nowotny P, Waldhausl W. Effect of endothelin-1 in man. Circulation. 1990;81:1415-1418. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kahaleh MB, Osborn I, Le Roy EC. Increased factor VIII/von Willebrand factor antigen and von Willebrand factor activity in scleroderma and Raynaud's phenomenon. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:482-484.
  34. Wagner OF, Christ G, Wojta J, Vierhapper H, Parzer S, Nowotny PJ, Schneider B, Waldhausl W, Binder BR. Polar secretion of endothelin-1 by cultured endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:16066-16068. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dubin D, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Endothelin, a potent vasoconstrictor, is a vascular smooth muscle mitogen. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:150-154.
  36. Filep JG, Sirois MG, Rousseau A, Fournier A, Sirois P. Effects of endothelin-1 on vascular permeability in the conscious rat: interactions with platelet-activating factor. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;104:797-804.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
S Hennigan, R. Channick, and G. Silverman
Rituximab treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report
Lupus, August 1, 2008; 17(8): 754 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
N Galie, A Manes, K V Farahani, F Pelino, M Palazzini, L Negro, S Romanazzi, and A Branzi
Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated to connective tissue diseases
Lupus, September 1, 2005; 14(9): 713 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
J. J Jang, J. W Olin, and V. Fuster
A teenager with mixed connective tissue disease presenting with an acute coronary syndrome
Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2004; 9(1): 31 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. Galie, A. Manes, and A. Branzi
The endothelin system in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2004; 61(2): 227 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
D. Henrion, M. Iglarz, and B. I. Levy
Chronic Endothelin-1 Improves Nitric Oxide–Dependent Flow-Induced Dilation in Resistance Arteries From Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 1999; 19(9): 2148 - 2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Frostegard, R. Wu, C. Gillis-Haegerstrand, C. Lemne, and U. de Faire
Antibodies to Endothelial Cells in Borderline Hypertension
Circulation, September 15, 1998; 98(11): 1092 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. G. Filep
Endogenous Endothelin Modulates Blood Pressure, Plasma Volume, and Albumin Escape After Systemic Nitric Oxide Blockade
Hypertension, July 1, 1997; 30(1): 22 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filep, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Szegedi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filep, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Szegedi, G.