(Circulation. 1995;92:3229-3234.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco (Calif) General Hospital (C.A.S., M.D.C.).
Correspondence to Paul Heidenreich, MD, Department of Cardiology, Box 0124, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0124. E-mail heiden@cardio.ucsf.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results To evaluate the incidence of pericardial effusion and its relation to mortality in HIV-positive subjects, 601 echocardiograms were performed on 231 subjects recruited over a 5-year period (inception cohort: 59 subjects with asymptomatic HIV, 62 subjects with AIDS-related complex, and 74 subjects with AIDS; 21 HIV-negative healthy gay men; and 15 subjects with non-HIV end-stage medical illness). Echocardiograms were performed every 3 to 6 months (82% had follow-up studies). Sixteen subjects were diagnosed with effusions (prevalence of effusion for AIDS subjects entering the study was 5%). Thirteen subjects developed effusions during follow-up; 12 of these were subjects with AIDS (incidence, 11%/y). The majority of effusions (80%) were small and asymptomatic. The survival of AIDS subjects with effusions was significantly shorter (36% at 6 months) than survival for AIDS subjects without effusions (93% at 6 months). This shortened survival remained significant (relative risk, 2.2, P=.01) after adjustment for lead time bias and was independent of CD4 count and albumin level.
Conclusions There is a high incidence of pericardial effusion in patients with AIDS, and the presence of an effusion is associated with shortened survival. The development of an effusion in the setting of HIV infection suggests end-stage HIV disease (AIDS).
Key Words: pericardium AIDS heart diseases echocardiography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathogenesis of pericardial effusion in HIV infection is also unclear. Numerous case reports have described Kaposi's sarcoma,14 mycobacteria,15 16 cytomegalovirus,17 prosthetic valve endocarditis,18 bacterial pericarditis,19 and lymphoma20 as causes of HIV-related pericardial effusion. However, the acutely ill inpatient population described in these studies may not represent the majority of HIV-infected individuals with pericardial effusions, many of whom are asymptomatic.21
AIDS patients with pericardial effusions have demonstrated a lower CD4 count than AIDS patients without effusions9 ; however, the relation of pericardial effusion to mortality has not been described.
To determine the prevalence, incidence, and relation to mortality of pericardial effusion in HIV-infected subjects, we analyzed data from an ongoing long-term prospective study of cardiac disease in HIV-infected patients, the Prospective Evaluation of Cardiac Involvement in AIDS (PRECIA).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subject Populations
Five groups of subjects were recruited.
Group 1 was made up of
asymptomatic HIV-positive homosexual men with no
illness (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] group II).
HIV-positivity was defined as a positive ELISA with Western blot
confirmation. Group 2 included HIV-positive homosexual men with
persistent generalized lymphadenopathy (formerly AIDS-related complex
[ARC]) defined by CDC group III. Group 3 comprised HIV-positive
homosexual men diagnosed with AIDS within the previous 12 months. AIDS
was defined by CDC group IV. Group 4 included HIV-negative homosexual
men, and group 5 was made up of HIV-negative men with chronic and/or
terminal illness with the degree of inanition seen in AIDS
subjects.
Subjects were excluded if they were younger than 18 years of age, showed hemodynamic instability (systolic pressure <90 mm Hg), or were in the terminal stage of disease (estimated survival <4 months). Subjects in groups 1 through 3 were recruited only in the outpatient setting, and an attempt was made to enroll consecutive subjects. The period of recruitment was 4.5 years, beginning in 1988. All patients of any of the three AIDS primary care physicians at the University of California at San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital were eligible. Other groups were identified by advertisement in local bulletins. To reduce selection bias, descriptions of the study did not mention the heart as the organ of interest to investigators. Both inpatients and outpatients were recruited for group 5. All subjects provided informed consent in a procedure approved by the Committee on Human Research at the University of California at San Francisco.
A total of 248 subjects volunteered for the study. Of these, 231 had at least one echocardiogram and were included in the investigation.
Protocol
After informed consent was given, a history was
obtained and a
physical examination was performed. An ECG, chest roentgenography, and
laboratory data, including routine chemistry, hematology, and T4 cell
counts, were obtained at baseline. All subjects underwent
transthoracic echocardiography
according to the following schedule: groups 1 through 3 and 5, at
baseline and then every 4 months; group 4, at baseline and then
annually. Annual follow-up included history, physical, and standard
laboratory data. During the 5 years of the study, 41 of 231 subjects
(18%) did not have follow-up echocardiograms. An attempt was made
to contact all subjects at the conclusion of the study to determine
survival. If a subject demonstrated HIV disease progression
(asymptomatic HIV infection to ARC to AIDS), he was
assigned to more than one group. The subject was considered to be in
the initial group until disease progression was demonstrated, at which
point he was added to the appropriate second group (ARC or AIDS). The
study entry time for the second group was at the diagnosis of disease
progression.
Associated Diagnoses
A diagnosis of tuberculosis was based on
a positive culture.
Clinical congestive cardiomyopathy was considered
present if an experienced cardiologist diagnosed congestive heart
failure. Pneumocystis infection was considered present if sputum
smears were positive. A diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection required
histological demonstration of infection in the setting
of clinical disease. Diagnoses of Kaposi's sarcoma and lymphoma were
based on histology.
Echocardiography
Two-dimensional echocardiography was
performed with commercial ultrasound scanners (Acuson and Hewlett
Packard). Standard views, including the left lateral decubitus and
supine positions, were obtained. An experienced
echocardiographer who did not know the subjects'
diagnostic groups reviewed all echocardiograms. A
pericardial effusion was diagnosed if an echo-free space between
the visceral and parietal pericardium persisted throughout the cardiac
cycle. The size of the pericardial effusion was defined as follows:
small when the maximum pericardial space at end diastole
was <10 mm, moderate when the space was
10 mm but <20 mm, and large
when the pericardial space was
20 mm between the pericardial
layers.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD or
proportions. Comparisons
between proportions were evaluated by the
2 test
with the Yates correction. Survival and incidence are displayed with
Kaplan-Meier and actuarial survival curves. Differences in mortality
for the entire survival curve were determined with the log-rank
test. The independent effects of several variables on survival were
evaluated by use of stepwise logistic regression (SAS, SAS
Institute Inc). The 95% CIs were obtained for two-tailed tests.
Differences were considered significant at P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fifty-nine subjects entered the study as asymptomatic HIV (group 1). Five of these subjects progressed to ARC and 13 progressed to AIDS during the study. Sixty-two subjects entered the study as ARC (group 2), and 5 asymptomatic HIV subjects developed ARC, for a total of 67. Progression to AIDS occurred in 12 ARC subjects. Seventy-four subjects entered the study with a diagnosis of AIDS (group 3), and 25 asymptomatic HIV and ARC subjects developed AIDS, for a total of 99. Twenty-one uninfected homosexual men entered the study (group 4), none of whom developed HIV infection. Fifteen subjects were enrolled with chronic debilitating illnesses (group 5).
Prevalence and Incidence
A pericardial effusion was diagnosed
in 16 subjects during the
study. Three subjects had an effusion on study entry (2 subjects with
AIDS and 1 subject with end-stage medical illness), and 3 more
subjects developed an effusion at the time of progression to AIDS
(group 3). Therefore, 5 effusions were present on the subjects'
first echocardiograms as AIDS subjects (prevalence, 5% [5 of 99]),
and 1 was present as a group 5 subject (end-stage medically
ill; prevalence, 7% [1 of 17]; P=NS, group 3 versus
group
5).
Eight subjects developed an effusion after an initial negative echocardiogram as AIDS subjects, 1 as an asymptomatic HIV subject, and 1 as an ARC subject. The asymptomatic HIV subject would now be classified as AIDS by the more recent CD4 criteria (<200 cells/cm3).22 Thus, of the 16 effusions diagnosed, 15 were in HIV-infected patients (13 AIDS patients, 1 ARC patient, and 1 asymptomatic HIV patient). The latter two patients developed AIDS during the course of the investigation and were included as AIDS patients from the time of AIDS diagnosis.
The incidence of pericardial effusion in surviving AIDS
subjects was
11%/y over a 2-year period (Fig 1
). No
effusions were diagnosed in the healthy HIV-negative subjects.
|
Effusion Characteristics
Of the 15 effusions in HIV-infected
patients, 12 (80%) were
small, 2 (13%) were moderate, and 1 (6%) was large. All 12 small and
1 moderate effusions (87%) were asymptomatic. The 1
symptomatic moderate and 1 large effusion developed signs
and symptoms of tamponade and demonstrated right
ventricular collapse on
echocardiography (incidence of tamponade, 9%/y for
AIDS subjects with effusion and 1%/y for all AIDS subjects). Both
subjects were treated with pericardiocentesis, and the subject with the
large effusion underwent partial pericardectomy.
Follow-up Echocardiography
Of the 15 HIV-infected subjects
with effusions, 8 died and 1
withdrew before the scheduled 4-month follow-up study. Of the
remaining 6 with follow-up studies, 4 effusions were no longer
present. Of these 4 subjects, 1 previously underwent partial
pericardectomy, and another demonstrated effusion recurrence on
a second follow-up study.
Cause
Of the 15 HIV-infected subjects with pericardial
effusions, a
cause was suggested in only 4 patients. Two subjects had non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma (not known to involve the heart), and 2 had depressed left
ventricular function (ejection fraction <50%). Only 2
subjects underwent pericardiocentesis, and only 1 of these was cultured
for bacteria and fungi (negative). No autopsy data were available. The
1 group 5 subject (HIV negative, ill) with an effusion had
hepatocellular carcinoma and severe liver disease, which probably
contributed to the development of the effusion.
Associated Conditions
Only 2 of 231 study patients developed
clinical pericarditis (1
asymptomatic HIV patient with no effusion and 1 AIDS
patient with effusion). When AIDS subjects with effusions were compared
with AIDS subjects without effusions, there were no significant
differences in intravenous drug use, age, weight, height,
race, history of Kaposi's sarcoma, tuberculosis, or use of AZT (Table
2
). Symptomatic left
ventricular systolic dysfunction was diagnosed in 1
patient with an effusion and in 7 AIDS patients without effusions.
Cardiac disease was suggested by physical examination in 3 other
subjects with effusions (S4, n=2; aortic
insufficiency murmur, n=1). An additional patient with an effusion
developed atrial flutter.
|
The causes of death for 6 subjects with effusions were known: dilated cardiomyopathy (n=1), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (n=1), other pneumonia (n=1), and wasting syndrome (n=1). In only 1 subject (large effusion, dilated cardiomyopathy) did the pericardial effusion probably contribute to death.
Effusion and CD4 and Albumin Levels
The average CD4 count for
AIDS subjects at the diagnosis of
pericardial effusion was 59±41 cells/cm3; range, 4 to 180
cells/cm3 (Table 2
). This was lower than the
CD4 count for noneffusion AIDS subjects (146±20
cells/cm3, P=.06) on study entry. A
weaker trend was observed for the CD4 percent of total T cells (10±3%
for patients with effusions versus 15±1% for patients without
effusions, P=.12). There was no obvious difference in total
T-cell count (868±214 cells/cm3 for patients with
effusions versus 956±87 cells/cm3 for patients without
effusions, P=.7).
Serum albumin levels for AIDS subjects were available at entry into the study for all subjects and within 1 month (n=8) and 4 months (n=10) of diagnosis of effusion. Within 4 months of effusion diagnosis, AIDS subjects had a significantly lower albumin level (4.00±0.1 g/dL) than AIDS subjects without an effusion on study entry (4.25±0.06 g/dL, P=.02).
Survival and Pericardial Effusion
Survival for all groups was
related to the stage of HIV infection
(2- year survival, 33±5.4% for patients with AIDS, 77±6.2% for
patients with ARC, 88±4.6% for asymptomatic
HIV-positive patients, and 95±4.9% for HIV-negative subjects). The
survival of group 5 subjects (severe non-HIV medical illness) was less
than that for AIDS subjects (50% versus 65% at 2 years); however,
this did not reach statistical significance.
For the 13 AIDS subjects
who developed effusions, the survival from
onset of the effusion was markedly decreased (36±11% at 6 months;
Fig. 2
). This was significantly shorter than survival in
AIDS subjects without effusions from study entry (93±3% at 6 months,
P<.01). This comparison is subject to lead time bias. To
control for this bias, each AIDS patient with an effusion was matched
by time in study to 6 AIDS patients without effusions. The time from
study entry to effusion development for each subject with an effusion
was subtracted from the time in the study for the matched patients.
With this analysis, the difference in survival between AIDS
patients with and without effusions remained significant for the entire
study period (relative risk, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0;
P=.01).
|
Univariate predictors of survival
(P
.2)
included T4 count, albumin level, history of tuberculosis, and
effusion development. Other variables tested that were not
associated with survival included age, history of tuberculosis,
cytomegalovirus, pneumocystis or other pneumonia, and Kaposi's
sarcoma. The four variables associated with survival (effusion
development, T4 count, albumin level, and tuberculosis) were
entered stepwise in multivariable logistic regression models of
12- and 18-month survival for AIDS subjects. The final model included
three variables: T4, albumin level, and effusion
development (Table 3
). The addition of
tuberculosis (P>.9 for adjusted association with survival)
did not improve the model and increased the lack of fit; therefore, it
was excluded. To control for lead time bias, survival was measured from
study entry for all subjects. Only the effusion development was
associated with decreased 12-month survival. When survival was measured
at 18 months, both effusion development and CD4 cell count were
independently associated with decreased survival.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several previous prospective studies9 10 11 12 13 have followed AIDS patients with serial echocardiograms; however, short follow-up time limited the determination of incidence. In this study, the incidence of pericardial effusion increased as HIV infection progressed (0%/y in asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects versus 11%/y for subjects with AIDS).
The large majority of effusions were small (80%) and asymptomatic (87%). Only 1 patient developed tamponade, and only 2 patients were treated with pericardial drainage. Recent prospective investigations9 11 have also found large, hemodynamically significant effusions to be less common than small effusions. These findings are in contrast to previous retrospective reports of hospitalized AIDS patients23 that suggested a high incidence of large effusions requiring pericardiocentesis. One explanation for this discrepancy is the patient populations evaluated. In our study, only outpatients were recruited, and preterminal echocardiograms frequently were not performed. If echocardiography had been performed during the terminal period of HIV disease, a greater number of large effusions may have been identified.
A previous investigation of AIDS-related cardiac abnormalities has suggested that effusions frequently resolve over time.9 Only 2 of 15 subjects (13%) with intact pericardium demonstrated persistent resolution. This rate of resolution is less than that in the study by Blanchard et al,9 which noted resolution in 42% of subjects (5 of 12) with pericardial effusion.
No definitive cause was determined for any pericardial effusion in this study, but causal agents were suggested by associated disease in 4 subjects (lymphoma in 2 and cardiomyopathy in 2). No subject was diagnosed with an infectious cause. However, because pericardiocentesis was performed in only 1 subject, infectious or malignant causes cannot definitively be ruled out.
This study demonstrated a markedly shortened survival once a pericardial effusion was diagnosed. In AIDS subjects with effusions, the mortality at 6 months from onset of the effusion (62%) was almost ninefold greater than the 6-month mortality for subjects without effusions (7%). The difference in survival remained significant after adjustment for lead time bias. A multivariable analysis, including CD4 count and serum albumin as determinants of survival, also demonstrated that the development of a pericardial effusion was independently associated with increased mortality. These findings indicate that a pericardial effusion in the setting of HIV infection is a marker of shortened survival.
Several potential explanations exist for this shortened survival after the development of a pericardial effusion. First, an effusion may be a marker for undiagnosed opportunistic infections. The development of an effusion may also be a function of the immune status, as reflected in the CD4 count. Indeed, several reports6 9 have described a significantly reduced CD4 count in patients with effusions compared with patients without effusions. In the present study, subjects with effusions had lower CD4 counts compared with AIDS subjects without effusions. Hypoalbuminemia is also a marker of end-stage HIV infection, and predictive of shortened survival independent of CD4 count.24 However, when survival was controlled for CD4 count and albumin level, the development of a pericardial effusion remained a strong predictor of 12- and 18-month survival.
Several hypotheses for the increased incidence of pericardial effusion in HIV infection have been advanced. End-stage HIV infection is associated with an increased risk of malignancies and infections known to involve the pericardium. Numerous case reports have described HIV-related pericardial effusion in the setting of lymphoma,25 Kaposi's sarcoma,14 and infection with bacteria,19 tuberculosis,8 15 other mycobacterium,16 18 cytomegalovirus,17 nocardia,26 and cryptococcus.27
Our study suggests that these are uncommon causes of effusions in the majority of AIDS subjects. We found little relation between Kaposi's sarcoma, tuberculosis, and cytomegalovirus infection in AIDS subjects and the development of a pericardial effusion although the small number of effusions in this investigation limits the power of this observation. Dilated cardiomyopathy was infrequently identified in HIV-infected patients and was not associated with pericardial effusion. This finding is in accordance with an autopsy study2 that found cardiomyopathy in only 2 of 38 AIDS patients with pericardial effusion. Hypoalbuminemia, which is associated with ascites and pleural and pericardial effusions, is a potential cause of pericardial effusion in end-stage HIV infection. In this investigation, subjects with effusions had lower albumin levels at the time of diagnosis than subjects without effusions on study entry. This difference, though statistically significant, was small (4.00 versus 4.25 g/dL) and is unlikely to be the explanation for the high prevalence of effusion in AIDS.
Other studies have described a similar lack of diagnosis for pericardial effusion in the setting of HIV infection.2 11 18 28 An autopsy review of 115 patients with AIDS was unable to determine an obvious diagnosis in all 35 patients with pericardial effusions.2 In the only cytological study to date, Zakowski and Ianuale28 examined effusions in 14 AIDS patients and biopsies in 10 of these 14 patients. No infectious causes were found, and only 2 patients (13%) demonstrated malignancy (lymphoma in patients with a previous lymphoma diagnosis). The remainder (87%) were idiopathic. In a previous study,29 10 of 25 consecutive patients with HIV infection and pericardial effusion underwent pericardiocentesis or surgical pericardiotomy. Fluid (all exudative) and tissue samples did not provide a diagnosis in any patient.
Another explanation for the increased incidence of pericardial effusion is an end-stage HIV capillary leak syndrome. Evidence for this theory comes from autopsy studies demonstrating frequent coexistence of pericardial effusions, serous pleural effusions, and ascites.2 30 Cytokines such as interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor are known to be elevated in end-stage HIV infection31 and are associated with capillary leak syndromes.32 Unexplained pericardial effusion in AIDS patients may therefore be secondary to and a marker of cytokine activation in end-stage HIV infection.
HIV has been identified in both pericardial fluid33 and myocardial tissue.34 However, it is unclear whether the virus is a direct cause of pericarditis or myocarditis.
Study Limitations
This study has several potential
limitations, including the lack
of pathological and autopsy diagnoses. Because the majority of
pericardial effusions were small and asymptomatic,
pericardiocentesis was rarely performed. In addition, very few subjects
underwent autopsy. Therefore, the cause of pericardial effusion and the
severity of pericardial disease at the time of death are unknown. As
noted above, this may account for the limited number of large
pericardial effusions identified.
The small total number of effusions identified limited the determination of risk factors for effusion development. Given the rate of effusion development observed, a study three times the size of this investigation would be required to detect a 20% difference in patient characteristics. Only men were included in this investigation; therefore, the association between pericardial effusion and HIV infection in women is unclear.
Clinical Implications
The diagnosis of an asymptomatic
pericardial
effusion may signal end-stage HIV disease despite a relatively
preserved CD4 count. Because these effusions are frequently small and
rarely progressive, an exhaustive search for a pericardial diagnosis is
usually not indicated. Large symptomatic pericardial
effusions do occur, however, and may need aggressive evaluation and
therapy. If future studies confirm these findings, a pericardial
effusion in the setting of HIV infection may be considered a
diagnostic criterion for end-stage HIV infection
(AIDS).
In conclusion, we reported the results of a 5-year prospective evaluation of pericardial effusion in HIV-infected men. A high prevalence and incidence of pericardial effusion is noted and is related to the stage of HIV infection. Most effusions in this cohort of AIDS outpatients were small and asymptomatic but were associated with a markedly shortened survival independent of albumin level and CD4 count.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 18, 1995; revision received June 5, 1995; accepted July 17, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Jinno, T. Jirakulaporn, M. J. Bankowski, W. Kim, and R. Wong Rare Case of Nocardia asteroides Pericarditis in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patient J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2007; 45(7): 2330 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Corr Imaging of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease in AIDS patients. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 236 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Restrepo, L. Diethelm, J. A. Lemos, E. Velasquez, T. A. Ovella, S. Martinez, J. Carrillo, and D. F. Lemos Cardiovascular Complications of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 213 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Hsue and D. D. Waters What a Cardiologist Needs to Know About Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3947 - 3957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ntsekhe and J. Hakim Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection on Cardiovascular Disease in Africa Circulation, December 6, 2005; 112(23): 3602 - 3607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Dosios, N. P. Theakos, D. C. Angouras, O. I. Katsarou, and P. J. Asimacopoulos AIDS-related cardiac tamponade: Is surgical drainage justified? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 1084 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Permanyer-Miralda Acute pericardial disease: approach to the aetiologic diagnosis Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 252 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B D Prendergast HIV AND CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 793 - 800. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Nzuobontane, K N Blackett, and C Kuaban Cardiac involvement in HIV infected people in Yaounde, Cameroon Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2002; 78(925): 678 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Barbaro Cardiovascular Manifestations of HIV Infection Circulation, September 10, 2002; 106(11): 1420 - 1425. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. BARBARO, S. D FISHER, A. M PELLICELLI, and S. E LIPSHULTZ The expanding role of the cardiologist in the care of HIV infected patients Heart, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 365 - 367. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Barbaro Cardiovascular manifestations of HIV infection J R Soc Med, January 8, 2001; 94(8): 384 - 390. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Pellicelli, G. Barbaro, F. Palmieri, E. Girardi, C. D'Ambrosio, A. Rianda, G. Barbarini, D. Frigiotti, M. C. Borgia, and N. Petrosillo Primary Pulmonary Hypertension in HIV Patients: A Systematic Review Angiology, January 1, 2001; 52(1): 31 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.J. Monsuez, B. Gallet, L. Escaut, F. Vayre, J.C. Charniot, M. Pulik, M Merad, C. Minozzi, M. Slama, S. Weber, et al. Clinical outcome after coronary events in patients treated with HIV-protease inhibitors Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2000; 21(24): 2079 - 2080. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, D. Brennessel, M. Johnson, F. Rosner, P. Rerkpattanapipat, N. Wongpraparut, L. E. Jacobs, and M. N. Kotler Pericardial Effusion in Acquired Immunodeficiency Disease Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2000; 160(15): 2397 - 2398. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rerkpattanapipat, N. Wongpraparut, L. E. Jacobs, and M. N. Kotler Cardiac Manifestations of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Arch Intern Med, March 13, 2000; 160(5): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Silva-Cardoso, B. Moura, L. Martins, A. Mota-Miranda, F. Rocha-Goncalves, and H. Lecour Pericardial Involvement in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Chest, February 1, 1999; 115(2): 418 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Pericardial Effusion in AIDS: A Grim Sign Journal Watch Cardiology, February 1, 1996; 1996(201): 16 - 16. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
PERICARDIAL EFFUSION IN AIDS: A GRIM SIGN Journal Watch (General), December 15, 1995; 1995(1215): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |