Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:1188-1192

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nath, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haines, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nath, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haines, D. E.

(Circulation. 1995;92:1188-1192.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Correlation of Temperature and Pathophysiological Effect During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the AV Junction

Sunil Nath, MD; John P. DiMarco, MD, PhD; J. Paul Mounsey, MD, PhD; John H. Lobban, MD; David E. Haines, MD

From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Accelerated junctional rhythms have been observed before the development of AV nodal block during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the AV junction. However, the time course and temperatures required to induce an accelerated junctional rhythm and AV nodal block during this procedure have not yet been characterized.

Methods and Results Nineteen patients underwent RF ablation of the AV junction with a thermistor ablation catheter. RF energy was initially delivered at 10 W for 9 seconds and then increased by 5-W increments for 9 seconds at each power level up to a maximum power of 50 W. If a junctional rhythm was observed during the power titration, a 30- to 60-second RF application was then delivered at the same power level. The power was then further increased to a maximum of 50 W if AV nodal block was not observed after 20 seconds of RF delivery. The procedure was successful in all 19 patients. A median of one RF application (range, one to eight applications) was required to produce permanent AV nodal block. An accelerated junctional rhythm was observed during 89% of successful attempts versus 70% of unsuccessful deliveries (P=NS). The median time to onset of the junctional rhythm was significantly shorter during successful compared with unsuccessful applications (1.8 versus 7.7 seconds, respectively; P<.001). Similarly, the mean time to appearance of AV nodal block was significantly shorter during successful compared with unsuccessful attempts (19.6±9.4 versus 36.8±19.0 seconds, respectively; P<.01). The catheter tip temperatures associated with the development of an accelerated junctional rhythm were significantly lower than those associated with the appearance of AV nodal block (51±4°C versus 58±6°C, respectively; P<.001). Mean temperatures in the range of 60±7°C were required to produce permanent AV nodal block.

Conclusions The development of an accelerated junctional rhythm within 5 seconds and the appearance of AV nodal block within 30 seconds of RF onset were both highly characteristic of successful target sites during RF ablation of the AV junction. The accelerated junctional rhythm and AV nodal block were both highly temperature dependent. The temperatures associated with the onset of AV nodal block were significantly higher than the temperatures resulting in an accelerated junctional rhythm.


Key Words: catheter ablation • atrioventricular node • radiofrequency


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has become the preferred technique for creating permanent AV block in patients with atrial arrhythmias refractory to medical treatment. The reported success rate in recent series for producing complete AV nodal block with this technique has varied from 81.5% to 100%.1 2 3 4 5 Occasionally, ablation of the AV junction from the left ventricle has been required when the standard approach from the right side has failed.2 Previous studies have used electrogram criteria to identify the optimal ablation site for inducing permanent AV nodal block—typically an equal atrial and ventricular amplitude signal with a small-amplitude His deflection recorded on the ablation electrode to find the best ablation site.1 2 3 4 5 A potential problem with using only electrogram amplitudes to guide ablation of the AV junction is that patients are frequently in atrial fibrillation at the time of the procedure, making electrogram interpretation difficult. Other investigators have used a combination of electrograms and anatomic guidance to select the optimal ablation site.1 In one preliminary report, the occurrence of accelerated junctional beats at the onset of RF energy delivery was found to be the best predictor of complete AV nodal block.6

Tissue injury by RF ablation is presumed to be thermally mediated.7 The time course and temperatures associated with an accelerated junctional rhythm and complete AV nodal block during RF ablation of the AV junction have not previously been investigated. The aims of the current study were to investigate the time course and temperatures associated with the development of an accelerated junctional rhythm and permanent AV nodal block and to determine whether these parameters could be used as predictors of a successful RF ablation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The study population consisted of 19 patients referred for RF catheter ablation of the AV junction. All patients were enrolled in the Food and Drug Administration–approved Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the EP Technologies Radiofrequency Powered Cardiac Ablation System for Treatment of Supraventricular Arrhythmias multicenter trial. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Virginia. Patients were enrolled in the study between December 1993 and September 1994.

RF Catheter Ablation
The RF ablation catheter used in the study consisted of a quadripolar electrode catheter with a 7F deflectable tip and a 4-mm-long distal ablation electrode (EP Technologies Inc). The distance between each of the four electrodes was 2 mm. The catheter had a thermistor incorporated into the tip of the distal electrode. The thermistor was exposed to the surface at the apex of the electrode but was thermally insulated from the surrounding electrode by a polyamide plastic sheath. The thermistor was accurate to within ±2°C in the range of 37°C to 100°C.

RF energy was supplied by a 500-kHz RF generator that produced a maximum output of 50 W (EP Technologies Inc). Power, impedance, and temperature were continuously measured and displayed during each RF application. Power delivery was automatically discontinued if measured impedance exceeded 300 {Omega}.

Ablation Protocol
The patients were sedated with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl. With patients under local anesthesia, a 6F quadripolar catheter was inserted percutaneously into the right or left femoral vein and advanced into the right ventricular apex under fluoroscopic guidance. This electrode was used for temporary ventricular pacing if required during the procedure. The RF ablation catheter was inserted percutaneously into the right femoral vein and advanced across the tricuspid valve into the right ventricle under fluoroscopic guidance. The ablation catheter was initially positioned so that the distal ablation bipolar electrode pair recorded the largest-amplitude His bundle potential. The catheter was then withdrawn until the distal electrode pair recorded a small His bundle deflection and approximately equal-amplitude atrial and ventricular potentials. In patients who were in atrial fibrillation at the time of the procedure, the ablation catheter was initially positioned so that the distal electrode pair recorded a maximum His bundle potential. The catheter was then slowly withdrawn until the His and ventricular deflections decreased in amplitude and the atrial electrograms increased in amplitude but there was still a visibly distinct His bundle potential.

RF energy was delivered between the distal electrode of the ablation catheter and a large adhesive skin patch placed on the patient's arm or leg. RF applications were performed at each ablation site in the following manner: RF energy was initially delivered at 10 W for 9 seconds and then increased by 5-W increments for 9 seconds at each power level up to a maximum power of 50 W. If an accelerated junctional rhythm was observed during the power titration, a 30- to 60-second RF application was then delivered at the same power level. During the 30- to 60-second application, the power level was further increased to a maximum output of 50 W if complete AV nodal block was not observed after 20 seconds of RF delivery. The mean temperature during the 1-second time period before the onset of accelerated junctional beats or AV nodal block was recorded during the 30- to 60-second RF application. The time from the initiation of RF energy delivery to the onset of an accelerated junctional rhythm or AV nodal block was also measured. Peak temperature, mean temperature, and power were also measured for each 30- to 60-second RF application. If complete AV nodal block was produced, the patient was observed 30 minutes after the ablation, and if complete AV nodal block persisted, a rate-responsive dual- or single-chamber permanent pacemaker was implanted. If the RF application failed to produce AV nodal block or if AV nodal conduction returned during the waiting period, the ablation was repeated. Successful RF applications were defined as those that resulted in permanent AV nodal block. Unsuccessful RF applications were defined as those that resulted in no AV or transient AV nodal block. In patients in atrial fibrillation, an accelerated junctional rhythm was identified by a >=100-ms decrease in the mean RR interval with regularization of the rhythm (<=60-ms variation in the RR interval between beats after the onset of RF delivery). After the procedure, patients were observed in a telemetry unit for at least 24 to 48 hours and discharged from the hospital. Serial total creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB isoenzyme were obtained before the ablation and approximately 4 and 12 hours after the procedure.

Statistical Analysis
All normally distributed values are reported as mean±SD. Values with a nonnormal distribution are reported as median values±interquartile range. Continuous variables were analyzed with ANOVA or Student's paired and unpaired t tests. Categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. A value of P<.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The study population consisted of 11 men and 8 women. The mean age was 69±7 years (range, 55 to 78 years). Eleven patients underwent AV junctional ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation; 7 patients, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; and 1 patient, multifocal atrial tachycardia. The AV junctional ablation was successful in all 19 patients. The median number of 30- to 60-second RF applications per patient was one (range, one to eight). Fifteen minutes after the ablation, 7 patients had an intrinsic escape rhythm <=2000 ms with a mean cycle length of 1256±244 ms (range, 988 to 1622 ms). The mean total CK level was 71±49 U/L before the procedure and 146±107 U/L 12 hours after ablation (P<.01). However, no patient had a significant CK-MB isoenzyme rise after ablation. During a mean follow-up period of 5.4 months (range, 1 to 10 months), there were no late recurrences of AV nodal conduction.

AV Nodal Block
Of the 39 total 30- to 60-second RF deliveries, 19 (49%) resulted in the production of permanent AV nodal block, 9 (23%) were associated with transient AV nodal block, and 11 (28%) failed to achieve AV nodal block. The mean time from initiation of RF delivery to appearance of AV nodal block was significantly shorter during successful applications compared with unsuccessful attempts (19.6±9.4 versus 36.8±19.0 seconds, respectively; P<.01; Fig 1Down). Because AV nodal block could be identified only after cessation of the accelerated junctional rhythm, these values represent the maximal time to onset of block (Fig 2Down). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of early AV nodal block (<=30 seconds of RF onset) as a predictor of a successful ablation were 87%, 63%, and 81%, respectively.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Bar graph comparing the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful ablation sites during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the AV junction. Left, Mean time to onset of AV nodal block. Middle, Mean catheter tip temperature at onset of AV nodal block. Right, Peak catheter tip temperature during entire RF delivery. Vertical bars represent SEM. Shaded bars represent successful ablation sites; open bars, unsuccessful ablation sites.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Sample tracings of AV nodal block at a successful site during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the AV junction. Displayed are ECG surface leads I, II, and aVF (AVF in the figure) and intracardiac electrograms from the proximal electrode pairs (HBEP) of the ablation catheter and from a catheter positioned in the right ventricular apex (RVA). Block of AV nodal conduction (arrow) was initially observed after cessation of the accelerated junctional rhythm, 8.2 seconds after the onset of RF delivery. The catheter tip temperature (Temp) when AV nodal block was initially identified was 56°C.

The catheter tip temperatures recorded at the appearance of AV nodal block during applications resulting in permanent AV nodal block were not significantly different from those measured during RF deliveries associated with transient AV nodal block (58±6°C versus 59±6°C, respectively; Fig 1Up). The peak temperatures reached during successful applications were not significantly different from those reached during unsuccessful attempts (77±15°C versus 72±13°C, respectively; Fig 1Up). However, the mean temperatures measured during successful RF deliveries tended to be higher than during unsuccessful deliveries (60±7°C versus 56±7°C, respectively; P=.06), although there were no significant differences in the RF power levels used (37±10 versus 41±11 W, respectively; Fig 3Down).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bar graph comparing the mean catheter tip temperature measured (left) and radiofrequency (RF) power level used (right) during RF delivery at successful and unsuccessful sites. Vertical bars represent SEM. Shaded bars represent successful ablation sites; open bars, unsuccessful ablation sites.

Accelerated Junctional Rhythm
An accelerated junctional rhythm was observed during 17 of 19 (89%) successful deliveries compared with 14 of 20 (70%) unsuccessful applications (P=NS). Fig 4Down illustrates the characteristics of the junctional rhythm during successful RF deliveries compared with unsuccessful attempts. The catheter tip temperature associated with the onset of an accelerated junctional rhythm was not significantly different between successful and unsuccessful applications (51±4°C versus 52±5°C, respectively). The cycle length of the junctional rhythm was not significantly different between successful and unsuccessful applications (554±190 versus 648±170 ms, respectively). In contrast, the time to onset of a junctional rhythm was significantly shorter during successful ablation attempts compared with unsuccessful attempts (median, 1.8 versus 7.7 seconds; interquartile range, 1.5 to 4.5 seconds versus 5.2 to 8.9 seconds, respectively; P<.001; Fig 5Down). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of an early junctional rhythm (<=5 seconds of RF onset) as a predictor of a successful ablation were 86%, 79%, and 80%, respectively. The temperatures associated with the onset of a junctional rhythm were significantly lower than those associated with the appearance of AV nodal block (51±4°C versus 58±6°C, respectively; P<.001; Fig 6Down).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Bar graph comparing the characteristics of the accelerated junctional rhythm at successful and unsuccessful ablation sites. Left, Median time to onset of junctional rhythm. Vertical bars represent interquartile range. Middle, Mean cycle length of junctional rhythm. Vertical bars represent SEM. Right, Mean catheter tip temperature at onset of junctional rhythm. Vertical bars represent SEM. Shaded bars represent successful ablation sites; open bars, unsuccessful ablation sites.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Sample tracings of an accelerated junctional rhythm at a successful site during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the AV junction. Displayed are ECG surface leads I, II, and aVF (AVF in the figure) and intracardiac electrograms from the distal electrode pairs (HBED) and proximal electrode pairs (HBEP) of the ablation catheter and from a catheter positioned in the right ventricular apex (RVA). Accelerated junctional beats (arrows) were initially observed 1.6 seconds after the onset of RF delivery at a catheter tip temperature (Temp) of 45°C.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Bar graph comparing the mean catheter tip temperatures at the onset of complete AV nodal block (AVB) and accelerated junctional rhythm (JR). Vertical bars represent SEM.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrated that the development of an accelerated junctional rhythm within 5 seconds and the appearance of AV nodal block within 30 seconds of RF onset were both characteristic of successful target sites during RF ablation of the AV junction. This study also found that the catheter tip temperatures associated with the onset of AV nodal block were significantly higher than those associated with the development of an accelerated junctional rhythm. Mean temperatures in the range of 60±7°C were required to ensure permanent AV nodal block. Unsuccessful RF applications were characterized by either no junctional rhythm or the relatively late onset of a junctional rhythm (>5 seconds) and AV nodal block (>30 seconds) after initiation of RF delivery. In addition, the mean catheter tip temperatures tended to be higher during successful RF applications compared with unsuccessful deliveries, even though there were no significant differences in the power levels used. This latter finding implies better electrode-tissue contact during successful RF applications.7

Previous Studies
Previous in vitro studies have found that temperatures >=50°C are required to produce irreversible loss of myocellular excitability and conduction block in ventricular myocardium.8 9 In addition, two clinical studies have reported that the mean temperatures associated with permanent block of accessory pathway conduction were 62±15°C and 63±12°C, respectively.10 11 However, no previous study has investigated the temperatures associated with the development of an accelerated junctional rhythm or AV nodal block. The current study found that significantly more tissue heating was required to induce AV nodal block than an accelerated junctional rhythm during RF ablation of the AV junction. Junctional rhythms have been observed during both RF ablation of the AV junction and ablation of posteroseptal "slow" AV nodal pathway sites.1 2 3 4 5 12 In the latter case, the development of a junctional rhythm is typically not associated with the appearance of AV nodal block. A previous study reported that junctional rhythms leading to AV nodal block had faster rates and were more likely to exhibit VA dissociation than those not associated with AV nodal block.12 In the current study, no significant differences in the cycle lengths of the junctional rhythms were found between those resulting in permanent AV nodal block and those associated with transient or no block. Because many of the patients were in atrial fibrillation at the time of the ablation, VA conduction could not be reliably assessed in the current study.

Pathophysiology
It has been shown both in vitro and in vivo that the rate of temperature rise at the RF ablation electrode-tissue interface is rapid, and steady-state temperatures are reached within a few seconds.7 13 14 However, because heating of deeper tissue layers depends on the slower process of heat conduction away from the electrode-tissue interface, the rate of tissue temperature rise is progressively slower with increasing distance from the ablation electrode.7 13 14 In addition, steady-state tissue temperatures fall in an inverse proportion to distance from the ablation electrode.7 Consequently, a critical determinant of success during ablation of the AV junction is the distance between the ablation electrode and the compact AV node. The greater the distance the ablation electrode is positioned from the compact AV node, the longer the time required to reach a target temperature and the lower the steady-state temperature achieved. This will result in either a delay in onset of the junctional rhythm and AV nodal block or no pathophysiological effect at all.

An important determinant of tissue heating is electrode-tissue contact. As a result of greater convective cooling by the circulating blood pool, sites with poor electrode-tissue coupling would be expected to have less efficient myocardial heating than sites with good electrode-tissue contact. This may also result in a slower rate of rise of tissue temperatures, leading to a delay in onset of a junctional rhythm or AV nodal block at poorly coupled sites.

The precise origin and mechanism of the junctional rhythms observed during RF ablation have not been well defined. In vitro experiments have demonstrated heat-induced abnormal automaticity of ventricular myocardium at temperatures >45°C.8 The junctional rhythms may therefore be caused by heat-induced automaticity of transitional cells or perinodal atrial or ventricular myocardium.

Clinical Implications
The current study suggests that development of an accelerated junctional rhythm within 5 seconds of RF initiation may be a useful marker of a successful target site during RF ablation of the AV junction. In addition, the study found that the temperatures associated with the development of AV nodal block were significantly higher than the temperatures resulting in an accelerated junctional rhythm. This finding suggests that even if a relatively rapid-onset junctional rhythm is observed after initiation of RF delivery, further increases in tissue heating are still necessary to ensure permanent AV nodal block. If, at maximal power levels, mean temperatures within a range of 60±7°C cannot be attained, then the ablation catheter may need to be manipulated, or a long sheath may need to be used to obtain better electrode-tissue contact and hence more tissue heating. If, despite these maneuvers, adequate temperatures are still not attained, a left ventricular approach should be considered.2

Study Limitations
The times to onset of a junctional rhythm and AV nodal block reported in the current study may, in part, be a function of the step-up increase in power used in the study. A protocol where high power is applied initially may have resulted in more rapid onset of electrophysiological effects. In addition, because ablation sites were selected on the basis of 9-second RF applications, the results of this study may not be applicable to other ablation protocols where longer RF applications are initially used. However, the use of short test pulses may reduce the number of longer RF deliveries; hence, the amount of myocardial necrosis may be minimized. In the current study, the median number of 30- to 60-second RF applications was one, and no patient had a significant CK-MB isoenzyme rise after ablation. However, serum CK-MB activity after RF ablation may not be an accurate marker of myocardial injury because of RF-induced inactivation of the enzyme.15

The development of a junctional rhythm precluded precise identification of the initial time to onset of AV nodal block. Therefore, the time to onset of AV nodal block and the temperature associated with the initial appearance of block reported in the current study may be overestimations of the actual time and temperature required to produce AV nodal block during RF ablation of the AV junction.

Conclusions
The development of an accelerated junctional rhythm within 5 seconds and the appearance of complete AV nodal block within 30 seconds of RF onset were both characteristic of successful target sites during RF ablation of the AV junction. The accelerated junctional rhythm and AV nodal block were both highly temperature dependent. The temperatures associated with the development of AV nodal block were significantly higher than the temperatures resulting in an accelerated junctional rhythm AV. Temperatures in the range of 60±7°C were necessary to ensure permanent AV nodal block.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Sunil Nath, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, PO Box 158, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Email sn2v@virginia.edu.

Received December 19, 1994; revision received March 6, 1995; accepted March 10, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Yeung-Lai-Wah JA, Alison JF, Lonergan L, Mohama R, Leather R, Kerr CR. High success rate of atrioventricular node ablation with radiofrequency energy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1753-1758. [Abstract]
  2. Kalbfleisch SJ, Williamson B, Man KC, Vorperian V, Hummel JD, Calkins H, Strickberger SA, Langberg JJ, Morady F. A randomized comparison of the right- and left-sided approaches to ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:1406-1410. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Olgin JE, Scheinman MM. Comparison of high energy direct current and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:557-564. [Abstract]
  4. Morady F, Calkins H, Langberg JJ, Armstrong WF, de Buitleir M, El-Atassi R, Kalbfleisch SJ. A prospective randomized comparison of direct current and radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular junction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:102-109. [Abstract]
  5. Jackman WM, Wang X, Friday KJ, Fitzgerald DM, Roman C, Moulton K, Margolis PD, Bowman AJ, Kuck K-H, Naccarelli GV, Pitha JV, Dyer J, Lazzara R. Catheter ablation of atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency current in 17 patients: comparison of standard and large-tip catheter electrodes. Circulation. 1991;83:1562-1576. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Huang SKS. Predictors of successful catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989;12:675. Abstract.
  7. Haines DE, Watson DD. Tissue heating during radiofrequency catheter ablation: a thermodynamic model and observations in isolated perfused and superfused canine right ventricular free wall. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989;12:962-976. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Nath S, Lynch C III, Whayne JG, Haines DE. Cellular electrophysiological effects of hyperthermia on isolated guinea pig papillary muscle: implications for catheter ablation. Circulation. 1993;88(part 1):1826-1831.
  9. Simmers TA, Wittkampf FHM, de Bakker JMT, Hauer RNW. Relation between myocardial temperature gradient and volume of permanently and transiently affected tissue: implications for radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 1993;88(suppl I):I-399. Abstract.
  10. Langberg JJ, Calkins H, El-Atassi R, Borganelli M, Leon A, Kalbfleisch SJ, Morady F. Temperature monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways. Circulation. 1992;86:1469-1474. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Calkins H, Prystowsky E, Carlson M, Klein LS, Saul JP, Gillette P. Temperature monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures using closed loop control. Circulation. 1994;90:1279-1286. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Thakur RJ, Klein GJ, Yee R, Stites HW. Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1706-1710. [Abstract]
  13. Wittkampf FHM, Hauer RNW, Robles de Medina EO. Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation. Circulation. 1989;80:962-968. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wittkampf F, Hauer R, Velema E, de Bakker J. In vivo epicardial temperature profile during endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:582. Abstract.
  15. Haines DE, Walker J, Whayne JG, Bruns DE. Creatine kinase is inactivated by radiofrequency catheter ablation and should not be used to accurately estimate the volume of myocardial injury. Circulation. 1991;84:II-710. Abstract.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein
Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein
Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. D. McRury, D. Panescu, M. A. Mitchell, and D. E. Haines
Nonuniform Heating During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation With Long Electrodes : Monitoring the Edge Effect
Circulation, December 2, 1997; 96(11): 4057 - 4064.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nath, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haines, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nath, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haines, D. E.