Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:1793-1800

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, W. S.

(Circulation. 1995;92:1793-1800.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Functional Significance of Presynaptic {alpha}-Adrenergic Receptors in Failing and Nonfailing Human Left Ventricle

John D. Parker, MD; Gary E. Newton, MD; Joel S. Landzberg, MD; John S. Floras, MD, DPhi; Wilson S. Colucci, MD

From the Cardiovascular Division (J.D.P., G.E.N., J.S.F.), Departments of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and the Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and the Cardiovascular Division (J.S.L., W.S.C.), Departments of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to John D. Parker, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Rm 1609, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background There are {alpha}-adrenergic receptors on human myocardium that exert positive inotropic effects. The effect of {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade on human left ventricular (LV) performance has not been fully explored. Although {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade might have effects on LV function that are mediated via blockade of postsynaptic myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptors, it is also possible that blockade of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors and subsequent increased release of norepinephrine would have effects on LV performance. In the present study, we explored the effects of nonselective {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade on LV performance and transcardiac norepinephrine concentrations in a group of patients with normal LV function and in a group of patients with congestive heart failure secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy.

Methods and Results Using an intracoronary drug infusion technique, we administered the nonselective {alpha}-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine to 13 patients with normal LV function and 19 patients with congestive heart failure secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy. With a high-fidelity LV catheter, the systolic (+dP/dt) and diastolic (-dP/dt and Tau) LV function responses to intracoronary infusion of phentolamine (0.2 mg/minx5 minutes) were assessed. In 8 patients with normal ventricular function and 10 patients with congestive heart failure, arterial and coronary sinus blood samples were drawn to determine the effects of phentolamine on catecholamine concentrations. Phentolamine had no measurable effect on LV performance or catecholamine concentrations in the normal ventricular function group. In patients with congestive heart failure, intracoronary phentolamine caused a significant increase in +dP/dt and the rate of isovolumic LV relaxation (-dP/dt and Tau). These hemodynamic effects were accompanied by a significant increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine concentration but no change in arterial norepinephrine concentration.

Conclusions Myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade causes significant inotropic and lusitropic effects in the failing but not the nonfailing human LV. These effects appear to be mediated by increased release of norepinephrine from cardiac nerves secondary to blockade of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors. Differences in the responses of the failing and nonfailing human LV appear to reflect the higher level of sympathetic activation that is seen in the group with congestive heart failure. This suggests that the presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor exerts a tonic inhibitory effect on the release of norepinephrine from cardiac nerves in patients with congestive heart failure.


Key Words: receptors • adrenergic • alpha • diastole • cardiomyopathy


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although the ß-adrenergic receptor exerts important effects on left ventricular inotropic and lusitropic function in humans, the role of the {alpha}-adrenergic receptor pathway is less clear.1 In several animal species, {alpha}-adrenergic receptor stimulation causes an increase in myocardial contractile state (reviewed in Benfey2 ). In humans, myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptors have been identified by radioligand binding,3 4 5 and stimulation of myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptors exerts a positive inotropic response in situ.6 In vitro, {alpha}-adrenergic receptor stimulation prolongs the time course of myocardial contraction, and some studies have suggested that the period of relaxation is prolonged.7 8 9 Systemic infusion of {alpha}-adrenergic agonists may also be associated with a slowing of the rate of isovolumic left ventricular relaxation in intact animals10 ; however, one study in humans found no effect of the {alpha}-adrenergic agonist methoxamine on left ventricular relaxation.11

These investigations have focused on the postsynaptic effects of {alpha}-adrenergic stimulation on myocardial function. It is of importance that the response to adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists may also reflect presynaptic modulation of neurotransmitter release.12 Using an intracoronary drug infusion technique (to avoid systemic hemodynamic effects), we have previously reported that myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptor stimulation with phenylephrine causes a positive inotropic effect in both the normal and failing human left ventricle.6 Surprisingly, in that investigation, the intracoronary administration of the nonselective {alpha}-adrenergic receptor antagonist phentolamine was also associated with an increase in left ventricular peak +dP/dt in patients with congestive heart failure that was of borderline statistical significance; this effect was not observed in patients with normal ventricular function. Subsequent analysis of left ventricular responses to phentolamine revealed a significant increase in the rate of left ventricular relaxation during acute intracoronary {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade in patients with congestive heart failure13 ; again, this effect was not observed in those with normal left ventricular function. In the present study, we extended our initial hemodynamic observations to a larger number of subjects and attempted to elucidate the mechanism by which {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade might exert a positive inotropic and lusitropic effect in the failing human left ventricle. We hypothesized that these responses to phentolamine were mediated by blockade of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors with subsequent increased neuronal release of norepinephrine. Because patients with congestive heart failure have increased sympathetic activity,14 15 16 this mechanism could also explain a differential effect of {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade in subjects with normal function compared with those with congestive heart failure. Accordingly, we coupled these additional hemodynamic measurements with measurements of arterial and coronary sinus catecholamine levels before and after the intracoronary administration of phentolamine.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
The study population consisted of 32 patients divided into two groups. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm. Fourteen of the patients had been included in a prior study of the effects of {alpha}-adrenergic stimulation on left ventricular systolic function.6 They were included in the results of the present study because they had undergone left ventricular pressure recordings that allowed calculation of the rate of left ventricular relaxation (data that were neither reported nor analyzed in the previous investigation). The normal ventricular function group (n=13) had no evidence of left ventricular dysfunction, mitral insufficiency, or symptomatic congestive heart failure. These patients (9 men and 4 women; mean age, 48±4 years) had normal baseline hemodynamics (Table 1Down). Nine had normal coronary anatomy and 4 had significant coronary artery disease. All had been taking nitrates, calcium channel antagonists, and/or ß-adrenergic antagonists; these medications were withheld for at least 18 hours before the investigation. The congestive heart failure group (n=19) consisted of patients with idiopathic (n=12), peripartum (n=1), ethanol-related (n=1), or muscular dystrophy–related (n=1) dilated cardiomyopathy. The remaining 4 patients with congestive heart failure had ischemic cardiomyopathy. There were 11 men and 8 women (mean age, 50±3 years). All had evidence of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction by two-dimensional echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 25±2%). Patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II (n=7), III (n=8), or IV (n=4) of congestive heart failure. All patients with congestive heart failure were taking digoxin, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. None of these patients were taking ß-adrenergic–blocking agents, although 2 were receiving low-dose amiodarone. In the congestive heart failure group, all medications were withheld on the morning of the procedure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Hemodynamics

The investigation was completed at two sites. Eighteen patients were studied at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass, and the remaining 14 patients were studied at the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. At both centers, the protocol was approved by the ethical review committee for experimentation involving human subjects. Written, informed consent was obtained in all cases.

Hemodynamic Measurements
All patients initially underwent routine diagnostic left- and right-side heart catheterization with the femoral approach. After the diagnostic procedure, at least 20 minutes elapsed before the beginning of this investigation. A 7F micromanometer-tipped catheter was then placed into the left ventricle. Femoral artery pressure was monitored via an 8F side-arm sheath (Cordis Laboratories). A 7F left Judkins catheter (Cordis Laboratories) was placed from the opposite femoral artery and advanced to the ostium of the left main coronary artery as would be done for routine contrast injection.

The ECG, femoral arterial pressure, left ventricular pressure, and the first derivative of left ventricular pressure continuous electronic differentiation were recorded on a strip-chart recorder. Measurements for heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, left ventricular minimum diastolic pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left ventricular peak +dP/dt (+dP/dt), and left ventricular peak -dP/dt (-dP/dt) were made by averaging at least 15 consecutive beats under each experimental condition.

The time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation, Tau, was calculated in two ways. The first method is a modification of that described by Weiss et al17 in which Tau (TL) is equal to -1/slope of the regression line for the natural logarithm of left ventricular pressure versus time for the period from peak -dP/dt to 5 mm Hg above left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. The second method is the direct measurement of the pressure half-time (T1/2), as described by Mirsky.18 With this method, Tau is measured directly from the pressure tracing as the time required for left ventricular pressure to fall to one half of its value at -dP/dt. Left ventricle pressure recordings were recorded at a paper speed of 100 mm/s and subsequently digitized at 2- to 4-ms intervals with a digitizing tablet (Summagraphics, Summagraphics Corporation) interfaced with a Macintosh personal computer. Values for Tau represent the mean value calculated from four to eight cardiac cycles during each experimental condition.

Arterial and Coronary Sinus Catecholamine Levels
In 8 patients with normal ventricular function and 10 patients with congestive heart failure, a Simmons II catheter (Cordis Laboratories) was placed into the coronary sinus via the right femoral vein for sampling of coronary sinus blood. In these cases, simultaneous femoral artery and coronary sinus blood specimens were drawn immediately after hemodynamic measurements at the end of both control and phentolamine infusion periods. Plasma samples were subsequently stored at -70°C and underwent subsequent analysis for catecholamine levels with high-performance liquid chromatography. The intra-assay coefficients of variation for norepinephrine and epinephrine in our laboratory are both less than 5%. The interassay coefficients of variation for norepinephrine and epinephrine are 5.0% and 7.2%, respectively.

Infusion Protocol
Left main intracoronary infusions were performed with the 7F left Judkins diagnostic catheter and a Harvard Apparatus infusion pump. Control measurements were made during the intracoronary infusion of 5% dextrose in water (D5W), the vehicle for intracoronary drug infusion, given at a rate of 2 mL/min. Phentolamine was then infused at a rate of 0.2 mg/min to yield a calculated coronary concentration of approximately 5x10-6 mol/L. Phentolamine was administered for a total of 5 minutes, with hemodynamic measurements and blood sampling completed during the last minute. After completion of the drug infusion protocol, we injected radiographic contrast to confirm the position of the JL-4 catheter in the left main coronary ostium. As mentioned, 14 patients were part of a previously reported investigation and had received sequential intracoronary infusions of dobutamine and phenylephrine before intracoronary phentolamine infusion.6 In these cases, repeat control measurements were made after infusion of D5W for 3 to 5 minutes. In each case, heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and +dP/dt had returned to within 5% of control values before the subsequent infusion of phentolamine. Hemodynamic measurements during this repeat control period were used as control values in this report of hemodynamic responses to phentolamine.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SEM. Differences between two observations for one variable within the same group were determined with a two-tailed, paired t test. Differences between two groups were determined with a two-tailed, nonpaired t test. The change in catecholamine concentrations caused by phentolamine in the two groups was also compared with a two-tailed, nonpaired t test. Differences were considered significant if the null hypothesis could be rejected at the P=.05 level. The relation between the change in the transcardiac gradient of norepinephrine caused by phentolamine and control coronary sinus norepinephrine levels was determined by simple linear regression.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline Hemodynamics
Patients in the control group had normal baseline hemodynamics (Table 1Up). As expected, the patients in the congestive heart failure group had markedly elevated left ventricular filling pressures, lower resting cardiac index, and higher resting heart rates. Left ventricular +dP/dt was significantly reduced in the congestive heart failure patients. TL, Tau by the method of Weiss et al,17 and T1/2, Tau by the method of Mirsky,18 were each significantly increased in the congestive heart failure group. The correlation coefficients for the linear regression of time versus the logarithm of left ventricular pressure during isovolumic relaxation were high in both groups, averaging .993±.001 in the normal function group and .991±.001 in the congestive heart failure group.

Hemodynamic Effects of Intracoronary Phentolamine
In patients with normal ventricular function, the intracoronary infusion of phentolamine caused a small but significant fall in systemic arterial blood pressure (132±4 versus 126±4 mm Hg, control versus phentolamine, P<.01; Table 2Down), along with a small but significant fall in left ventricular minimum pressure (5±1 versus 4±1 mm Hg, control versus phentolamine, P=.03; Table 2Down). In this group, there was no change in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of Intracoronary Phentolamine on Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Normal Ventricular Function

In patients with congestive heart failure, the administration of phentolamine caused small reductions in both systolic and mean arterial blood pressures that were of borderline statistical significance (122±5 versus 118±4 mm Hg and 89±3 versus 87±2 mm Hg, control versus phentolamine, P=.06 and .05, respectively; Table 3Down). Phentolamine caused significant reductions in both left ventricular end-diastolic and minimum pressures (24±3 versus 23±3 mm Hg and 14±2 versus 12±2 mm Hg, control versus phentolamine, P=.02 and <.01, respectively; Table 3Down) along with a small but significant increase in heart rate (92±3 versus 97±7 beats per minute, control versus phentolamine, P=.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of Intracoronary Phentolamine on Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure

Effects of Intracoronary Phentolamine on Left Ventricle Isovolumic Performance Indexes
In the normal ventricular function group, intracoronary phentolamine had no effect on +dP/dt (1382±119 versus 1382±106 mm Hg/s, control versus phentolamine, P=NS; Table 2Up). Similarly, in this group phentolamine caused no change in either -dP/dt (-1783±152 versus -1694±150 mm Hg/s, control versus phentolamine; P=NS) or the time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation (49±5 versus 47±4 ms and 35±3 and 34±3 ms, control versus phentolamine, TL and T1/2, respectively, P=NS; Table 2Up).

In the congestive heart failure group, intracoronary phentolamine was associated with both a positive inotropic and lusitropic response. Left ventricular +dP/dt increased from 797±63 to 849±74 mm Hg/s (P<.01; Table 3Up). Phentolamine also caused an increase in the rate of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation as indicated by an increase in -dP/dt (-878±63 versus -965±87 mm Hg, control versus phentolamine, P=.03; Table 3Up) and a decrease in the time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation (64±4 versus 55±4 ms and 45±3 versus 39±3 ms, control versus phentolamine, TL and T1/2, respectively, P<.01 for both; Table 3Up).

Effects of Intracoronary Phentolamine on Arterial and Coronary Sinus Catecholamines
Both arterial and coronary sinus norepinephrine levels were significantly higher in the congestive heart failure group (Fig 1Down and Table 4Down). In the patients with normal left ventricular function, the administration of phentolamine caused an increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine levels that did not achieve statistical significance (1.7±0.3 versus 2.5±0.7 nmol/L, control versus phentolamine, P=NS; Fig 2Down and Table 4Down). Phentolamine caused no change in arterial norepinephrine levels in this group (Figs 1Down and 2Down and Table 4Down). In patients with congestive heart failure, phentolamine caused a marked increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine levels (4.2±0.5 versus 8.3±1.2 nmol/L, control versus phentolamine, P<.01; Table 4Down) but no change in arterial norepinephrine levels (Figs 1Down and 2Down and Table 4Down). This increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine concentration was greater than that seen in the normal function group (Figs 1Down and 2Down). The increase in the arterial-to-coronary sinus norepinephrine gradient caused by phentolamine was not significant in the group with normal ventricular function (0.4±0.3 versus 1.3±0.5 nmol/L, control versus phentolamine, P=NS; Fig 3Down). In the congestive heart failure group, the transcardiac gradient of norepinephrine was significantly increased after phentolamine (1.6±0.5 versus 5.4±1.2 nmol/L, control versus phentolamine, P<.01; Fig 3Down), and an unpaired analysis reveals that this increase was significantly greater than that observed in the normal ventricular function group (Fig 3Down).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Bar graph of mean coronary sinus (CS) and arterial norepinephrine concentrations in patients from the normal ventricular function group during the control state (striped bars) and during intracoronary phentolamine administration (filled bars). B, Bar graph of mean CS and arterial norepinephrine concentrations in patients from the congestive heart failure group during the control state (striped bars) and during intracoronary phentolamine administration (filled bars). Data are mean±SEM. *P<.01 vs control, +P<.01 vs increase in the normal function group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effect of Intracoronary Phentolamine on Arterial and Coronary Sinus Catecholamines



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Plot of coronary sinus and arterial norepinephrine concentrations in individual patients from the normal ventricular function group during the control state (C) and during intracoronary phentolamine administration (P). B, Plot of coronary sinus and arterial norepinephrine concentrations in individual patients from the congestive heart failure group during C and P. Open circles represent the mean values. *P<.01 vs control, +P<.01 vs increase in the normal function group.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Bar graph of change in the transcardiac norepinephrine gradient in the normal ventricular function group during the control state (open bars) and during intracoronary phentolamine administration (filled bars). B, Bar graph of change in the transcardiac norepinephrine gradient in the congestive heart failure group during the control state (open bars) and during intracoronary phentolamine administration (filled bars). *P<.01 vs control, +P<.01 vs increase in the normal function group.

There was a significant correlation between control coronary sinus norepinephrine levels and the increase in the transcardiac norepinephrine gradient caused by phentolamine (y=1.11x-0.97, r2=.6, P<.01; Fig 4Down). The correlation was somewhat weaker when norepinephrine data from the congestive heart failure group alone were (y=1.24x-1.42, r2=.51, P=.02). There was no significant correlation of these values in the normal function group (y=0.4x+0.146, r2=.07, P=NS).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Plot of relation between coronary sinus norepinephrine levels during the control state and change in transcardiac norepinephrine gradient during phentolamine administration in all patients who underwent catecholamine sampling.

There was no change in arterial or coronary sinus epinephrine levels during phentolamine infusion in either the normal ventricular function group or the congestive heart failure group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study reveals that {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade exerts positive chronotropic, inotropic, and lusitropic effects on the failing human left ventricle. These hemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure are accompanied by an increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine. The effects were quite different than those observed during myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade in patients with normal left ventricular function.

These results are consistent with the hypothesis that phentolamine, a nonselective {alpha}-adrenergic receptor antagonist, causes increased cardiac neuronal release of norepinephrine in patients with congestive heart failure through blockade of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors on postganglionic cardiac sympathetic nerves. Patients with congestive heart failure have elevated systemic and cardiac sympathetic tone14 15 16 and presumably have elevated intrasynaptic concentrations of norepinephrine. Neuronally released norepinephrine stimulates inhibitory presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors, resulting in a local negative feedback control mechanism limiting further release of norepinephrine.19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Phentolamine, through blockade of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors, interrupted this local control mechanism and subsequently caused an increase in cardiac neuronal release of norepinephrine. This was reflected by the increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine and the observed changes in heart rate and ventricular performance.

In patients with normal left ventricular function, intracoronary phentolamine had no effect on heart rate or ventricular performance and caused a small increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine that did not achieve statistical significance. It is possible that this represents a type 2 statistical error and that this increase would achieve statistical significance if a larger number of patients were studied. Nevertheless, the increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine in patients with congestive heart failure was significantly greater than that observed in the normal ventricular function group. Taken together, these findings suggest that phentolamine had a more substantial effect on cardiac neuronal norepinephrine release in patients with congestive heart failure.

The presence of a presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor that, when stimulated, inhibits neuronal release of norepinephrine has been demonstrated in a number of in vitro preparations and in vivo animal studies.23 24 25 26 27 28 Investigations in the forearm have confirmed the presence of this presynaptic receptor system in humans.19 20 21 22 In a detailed study involving healthy volunteers, Grossman et al21 demonstrated that the intra-arterial administration of yohimbine, a selective {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, caused an increase in norepinephrine spillover to plasma in the forearm that could not be explained by the effect of the drug on local or systemic hemodynamics. Kubo et al,22 in a study of both healthy subjects and patients with congestive heart failure, found that the intra-arterial infusion of yohimbine caused an increase in forearm venous norepinephrine concentration in both groups. It is of importance that yohimbine caused a greater increase in forearm venous norepinephrine in patients with congestive heart failure than in normal control subjects. Also, the authors found a direct relation between basal venous norepinephrine concentration and the increase in norepinephrine concentration in response to {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor blockade. Their findings suggest that presynaptic {alpha}2-regulation of adrenergic transmission may be particularly important in situations of sympathetic activation such as congestive heart failure.

This is the first study in the human heart to demonstrate the presence and functional significance of a presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor that controls the release of norepinephrine. In the normal dog, Yamaguchi et al28 demonstrated that {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade had no effect on coronary sinus norepinephrine levels. However, {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade caused a marked potentiation of the increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine associated with stimulation of postganglionic cardiac nerves. This suggests that the response to presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor blockade is dependent on the state of sympathetic activation and that increased sympathetic nerve firing leads to recruitment of this negative feedback control mechanism.

The observations of Kubo et al22 and Yamaguchi et al28 are consistent with the present findings in patients with congestive heart failure. These patients had elevated arterial and coronary sinus norepinephrine levels indicative of sympathetic activation. We hypothesized that this heightened sympathetic tone was associated with increased stimulation of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors. Presynaptic receptor systems function by altering the probability that a given action potential will result in any single storage vesicle releasing its contents into the synaptic cleft. Therefore, in the setting of sympathetic activation and increased sympathetic nerve firing rate, presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic stimulation is probably a very important modulator of norepinephrine release. Phentolamine, by interrupting this negative feedback system, causes increased neuronal release of norepinephrine with resultant biochemical and ventricular function responses. The relation between the level of sympathetic activation and activation of presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors appears to be a systematic one since there was a significant correlation between basal coronary sinus levels of norepinephrine and the change in coronary sinus norepinephrine gradient associated with phentolamine.

The positive inotropic effect of phentolamine in patients with congestive heart failure cannot represent a postsynaptic effect of {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade because postsynaptic {alpha}-adrenergic receptor stimulation causes a positive inotropic response in humans.6 Thus, this positive inotropic response to phentolamine appears to be caused by increased synaptic concentrations of norepinephrine, which has both ß- and {alpha}-adrenergic receptor activity. Similarly, the positive lusitropic response to phentolamine was likely mediated by the ß-adrenergic effects of increased norepinephrine release.29 There are, however, theoretical reasons why the positive lusitropic effect of phentolamine in patients with congestive heart failure could have been contributed to by blockade of postsynaptic myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic receptors. Although the biochemical responses to {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor stimulation of the myocardium are incompletely understood, all current proposals involve alterations in calcium handling or the sensitivity of the contractile apparatus to calcium2 30 31 32 33 and therefore could also have an effect on isovolumic relaxation, an event that is modulated by calcium.34 The difference in the responses to phentolamine in normal and failing left ventricle might thus reflect the effects of increased {alpha}-adrenergic tone on myocardium in patients with congestive heart failure.14 15 16 Further investigations with selective {alpha}1- and {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor antagonists might provide information that is complementary to the present set of experiments. The use of a selective {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor antagonist (eg, yohimbine) would likely produce similar effects on cardiac norepinephrine production with potentially greater myocardial responses because postsynaptic {alpha}1-adrenergic receptors would not be affected. Similarly, the use of a selective {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor antagonist (eg, prazosin) would allow observations concerning the effects of blockade of basal {alpha}1-adrenergic activity on cardiac performance. Although the effects of {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade on resting coronary blood flow remain controversial,35 it is possible that phentolamine increased coronary blood flow in patients with congestive heart failure, thereby relieving asymptomatic subendocardial ischemia with subsequent effects on left ventricular function. Myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease has been documented to occur in animal models of congestive heart failure36 and might occur in some patients with idiopathic cardiomyopathy.37

A weakness of the present study is that although arterial and coronary sinus concentrations were quantified, we did not use measures of coronary blood flow combined with tracer doses of radiolabeled norepinephrine.15 16 38 The latter approach allows measurement of cardiac norepinephrine spillover, a more accurate index of the activity of cardiac sympathetic nerves. If phentolamine caused an increase in coronary blood flow, this may have reduced extraction of norepinephrine by myocardium, leading to an increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine concentration. This relation has been demonstrated in the human forearm, where increases in blood flow result in reduced extraction of circulating norepinephrine.39 Esler et al40 measured cardiac norepinephrine spillover in humans before and after administering desipramine to block neuronal reuptake of norepinephrine. In their experiment, desipramine reduced the fractional extraction of tritiated norepinephrine from 81% to 19% and increased coronary sinus plasma flow from 89 to 124 mL/min. This combination of blocking reuptake and increasing blood flow increased coronary sinus norepinephrine concentration from 212 to 304 pg/mL. Unfortunately, similar data are not available in patients with congestive heart failure, and the effects of coronary blood flow changes on coronary sinus norepinephrine levels might be different in this group. Therefore, it must be conceded that increased washout might explain an increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine concentration in the congestive heart failure group. Nevertheless, we believe that increased washout alone cannot explain the hemodynamic findings observed in this investigation. Critically, this mechanism would not increase the intrasynaptic concentration of norepinephrine. The increase in contractility demonstrated in this experiment implies greater myocardial adrenergic receptor stimulation, which would occur only with increased intrasynaptic concentrations of norepinephrine.

The administration of phentolamine was associated with small changes in left ventricular preload and afterload in both patient groups. We do not believe that this change in loading conditions is the cause of the change in left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions observed in the congestive heart failure group. First, the increase in +dP/dt cannot be explained by a decrease in either preload or afterload. Second, although changes in both afterload and preload have been shown to affect the rate of left ventricular relaxation,10 the changes observed in this investigation were small and unlikely to have caused the observed change in isovolumic relaxation.11 The congestive heart failure group also experienced a small increase in heart rate during phentolamine. Although increases in heart rate have been reported to have both positive inotropic and lusitropic effects, this is observed only with much greater increases in heart rate, and in patients with congestive heart failure such responses are blunted compared with in those with normal ventricular function.41 However, in the failing human left ventricle, isovolumic relaxation rates have been shown to be quite sensitive to changes in afterload,42 and in this group the combined effects of an increase in heart rate and a decrease in systolic pressure might have produced the observed increase in the rate of isovolumic relaxation.

Changes in loading conditions can also cause changes in sympathetic tone by reflex mechanisms. Although it is possible that the small decrease in systemic arterial blood pressure caused some increase in cardiac sympathetic tone by a baroreceptor-mediated mechanism, the fact that arterial catecholamine levels did not increase suggests that systemic sympathetic tone was not increased during phentolamine infusion. Furthermore, the normal ventricular function and congestive heart failure groups had similar decreases in arterial blood pressure during phentolamine administration. Because patients with congestive heart failure have blunted baroreceptor-mediated responses,43 the greater increase in coronary sinus norepinephrine concentration seen in this group must have been mediated by some other mechanism.

In the control group, baseline epinephrine levels were high, with a mean value of 1.1±0.5 nmol/L for the arterial sinus. In fact, four of the patients in the normal ventricular function group had epinephrine levels above the normal range. Norepinephrine levels within this group were all within the normal range. These elevated epinephrine levels presumably reflect adrenal release of epinephrine associated with the stress of the procedure. Although it is possible that this form of sympathetic activation may have had some impact on our results, the responses to the administration of phentolamine were not different from those by patients with normal epinephrine levels.

The effect of phentolamine on left ventricular performance in the patients with congestive heart failure was relatively small, and it is not certain that such an effect would be maintained during sustained therapy. It should be noted that these findings are consistent with prior observations concerning the effects of phentolamine in patients with congestive heart failure.44 45 Although direct evidence was lacking, it was suggested that phentolamine had direct myocardial effects that were mediated by norepinephrine release.46 From a therapeutic perspective, it is also not clear that an intervention that has positive inotropic effects and increases cardiac sympathetic activity would be desirable. More important is the fact that the present study demonstrates the presence of an presynaptic {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor system in congestive heart failure, which serves to inhibit the release of norepinephrine from cardiac nerves in patients with congestive heart failure and sympathetic activation. Is it possible that this pathway is dysfunctional in some patients with congestive heart failure, leading to inappropriate levels of norepinephrine release? Furthermore, this pathway may have some therapeutic implications. Agents that inhibit {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors might be found to have deleterious effects on cardiac sympathetic activity despite the fact that they might have favorable effects on peripheral vascular resistance. In contrast, an agent like clonidine might have beneficial effects in this regard. This is of particular interest because of the possibility that increased sympathetic activity is deleterious in congestive heart failure and evidence that ß-adrenergic receptor blockade may have favorable effects on long-term outcome in this disease. Therefore, the presence of this system has implications for understanding the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure as it relates to the sympathetic nervous system, and a better understanding of the functional integrity of this autonomic receptor pathway may be of eventual clinical importance.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (HSFO grant 2220). Dr Parker is a Scholar of the Medical Research Council of Canada. Dr Colucci is a Sandoz Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. Dr Floras is a Career Scientist of the Ministry of Health of the Province of Ontario. The authors thank the staff of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of the Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Laboratory of the Mount Sinai Hospital for their help in the completion of these studies.

Received November 28, 1994; revision received February 14, 1995; accepted February 25, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Leier CV, Binkley PF, Cody RJ. {alpha}-Adrenergic component of the sympathetic nervous system in congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1990;82(suppl I):I-168-I-176.

2. Benfey RG. Function of myocardial {alpha}-adrenoceptors. J Auton Pharm. 1993;13:351-372.

3. Bristow MR, Minobe W, Rasmussen R, Hershberger RE, Hoffman BB. Alpha-1 adrenergic receptors in the nonfailing and failing human heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;247:1039-1045. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Vago T, Bevilacqua M, Norbiato G, Baldi G, Chebat E, Bertora P, Baroldi G, Accinni R. Identification of {alpha}1-adrenergic receptors on sarcolemma from normal subjects and patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: characteristics and linkage to GTP-binding protein. Circ Res. 1989;64:474-481. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Bohm M, Diet F, Feiler G, Kemkes B, Erdmann E. {alpha}-Adrenoceptors and {alpha}-adrenoreceptor-mediated positive inotropic effects in failing human myocardium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12:357-364. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Landzberg JS, Parker JD, Gauthier DF, Colucci WS. Effects of myocardial {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade on contractility in man. Circulation. 1991;84:1608-1614. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Aass H, Skomedal T, Osnes J. Demonstration of an alpha-adrenoreceptor-mediated inotropic effect of norepinephrine in rabbit papillary muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983;226:572-578. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Skomedal T, Schiander IG, Osner JB. Both alpha and beta adrenoreceptor mediated component contribute to final inotropic response to norepinephrine in rat heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;247:1204-1210. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Bruckner R, Meyer W, Mugge A, Schmitz W, Scholz H. {alpha}-Adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic effect of phenylephrine in isolated human ventricular myocardium. Eur J Pharm. 1984;99:345-347. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Karliner JS, LeWinter MM, Mahler F, Engler R, O'Rourke RA. Pharmacologic and hemodynamic influences on the rate of isovolumic left ventricular relaxation in the normal conscious dog. J Clin Invest. 1977;60:511-521.

11. Starling MR, Montgomery DG, Mancini GBJ, Walsh RA. Load independence of the rate of isovolumic relaxation in man. Circulation. 1987;76:1274-1281. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Shepherd JT, VanHoutte PM. Local modulation of adrenergic neurotransmission. Circulaton. 1981;64:655-666. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Parker JD, Landzberg JS, Bittl JA, Colucci WS. Myocardial {alpha}-adrenergic tone impairs isovolumic relaxation in the failing human left ventricle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(suppl A):297A. Abstract.

14. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari TB, Garberg V, Lura D, Francis GS, Simon AB, Rector T. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:819-823. [Abstract]

15. Merideth IT, Eisenhofer G, Lambert GW, Dewar EM, Jennings GL, Esler MD. Cardiac sympathetic activity in congestive heart failure: evidence for increased neuronal norepinephrine release and preserved neuronal uptake. Circulation. 1993;88:136-145. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Kaye DM, Lambert GW, Lefkovits J, Morris M, Jennings G, Esler MD. Neurochemical evidence of cardiac sympathetic activation and increased central nervous system norepinephrine turnover in severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:570-578. [Abstract]

17. Weiss JL, Frederickson JW, Weisfeldt ML. Hemodynamic determinants of the time-course of fall in canine left ventricular pressure. J Clin Invest. 1976;58:751-760.

18. Mirsky I. Assessment of diastolic function: suggested methods and future considerations. Circulation. 1984;69:836-841. [Free Full Text]

19. Jie K, Timmermans PB, van Zwieten PA. Modulation of noradrenaline release by peripheral presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic adrenoreceptors in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9:407-413. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Grossman E, Rea RF, Hoffman A, Goldstein DS. Yohimbine increases sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine spillover in normal volunteers. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(Regul Integ Comp Physiol 29):R142-R147.

21. Grossman E, Chang PC, Hoffman A, Marye T, Goldstein DS. Evidence for functional {alpha}2-adrenoreceptors on vascular sympathetic nerve endings in the human forearm. Circ Res. 1991;69:887-897. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Kubo SH, Rector TS, Heifetz SM, Cohn JN. {alpha}2-Receptor–mediated vasoconstriction in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1989;80:1660-1666. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Starke K, Endo T, Taube HD. Pre- and post-synaptic components in effect of drugs with {alpha}-adrenoreceptor activity. Nature. 1975;254:440-441. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Gothert M, Schlicker E, Hentrich F, Rohm N, Zerkowski HR. Modulation of noradrenaline release in human saphenous vein via presynaptic alpha 2-adrenoreceptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 1984;102:261-267. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Wakade AR, Wakade TD. Reduction in norepinephrine content of sympathetic neuroeffector organs by alpha adrenergic antagonists and nerve stimulation: evidence for presynaptic control of sympathetic transmitter release in the intact animal. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1984;228:287-292. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Westfall TC. Evidence that noradrenergic transmitter release is regulated by presynaptic receptors. Fed Proc. 1984;43:1352-1357. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Kahan T, Dahlof C, Hjemdahl. Prejunctional alpha-adrenoreceptor-mediated inhibition of norepinephrine released in blood-perfused skeletal muscle in situ. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9:555-562. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Yamaguchi N, Champlain J, Nadeau R. Regulation of norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerves in the dog by presynaptic {alpha}- and ß-receptors. Circ Res. 1977;41:108-117. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Parker JD, Landzberg JS, Bittl JA, Mirsky I, Colucci WS. The effects of ß-adrenergic stimulation with dobutamine on isovolumic relaxation in the normal aand failing human left ventricle. Circulation. 1991;84:1040-1048. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Benfey BG. Lack of relationship between myocardial cyclic AMP concentrations and inotropic effects of sympathomimetic amines. Br J Pharmacol. 1971;43:757-763. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Exton JH. Mechanisms of calcium-mobilizing agonists: some variations on a young theme. FASEB J. 1988;2:2670-2676. [Abstract]

32. Minniman KP. Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes, inositol phosphates and sources of cell Ca++. Pharmacol Rev. 1988;40:87-119. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Endoh M, Blinks JR. Actions of sympathomimetic amines on the Ca2+ transients and contractions of rabbit myocardium: reciprocal changes in myofibrillar responsiveness to Ca2+ mediated through alpha- and beta-adrenoreceptors. Circ Res. 1988;62:247-265. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Gwathmey JK, Copelas L, MacKinnon R, Schoen FJ, Feldman MD, Grossman W, Morgan JP. Abnormal intracellular calcium handling in myocardium from patients with end-stage heart failure. Circ Res. 1987;61:70-76. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Hodgson JM, Cohen MD, Szentpetery S, Thames MD. Effects of regional {alpha}- and ß-blockade on resting and hyperemic coronary blood flow in conscious, unstressed humans. Circulation. 1989;79:797-809. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Hittinger L, Shannon RP, Kohin S, Lader AS, Manders WT, Patrick TA, Kelly P, Vatner SF. Isoproterenol-induced alterations in myocardial blood flow, systolic and diastolic function in conscious dogs with heart failure. Circulation. 1989;80:658-668. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Pasternac A, Noble J, Streulens Y, Elie R, Henschke C, Bourassa M. Pathophysiology of chest pain in patients with cardiomyopathies and normal coronary arteries. Circulation. 1982;65:778-789. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Rose CP, Burgess JH, Cousineau D. Tracer norepinephrine kinetics in coronary circulation of patients with heart failure secondary to chronic pressure and volume overload. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:1740-1747.

39. Chang PC, Kriek E, Van Der Krogt JA, van Brummelen P. Does regional norepinephrine spillover represent local sympathetic activity? Hypertension. 1991;18:56-66. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Esler MD, Wallin G, Dorward PK, Eisenhofer G, Westerman R, Meredith I, Lambert G, Cox HS, Jennings G. Effects of desipramine on sympathetic nerve firing and norepinephrine spillover to plasma in humans. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:R817-R823. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Ellenbogen RA, Mohanty PK, Szentepetery S, Thames MD. Arterial baroreflex abnormalities in heart failure: reversal after cardiac transplantation. Circulation. 1989;79:51-58. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Eichhorn EJ, Willard JD, Alvarez L, Kim AS, Glamman DB, Risser RC, Grayburn PA. Are contraction and relaxation coupled in patients with and without congestive heart failure? Circulation. 1992;85:2132-2139. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Feldman MD, Alderman JD, Aroesty JM, Royal HD, Ferguson JJ, Owen RM, Grossman W, McKay RG. Depression of sytolic and diastolic myocardial reserve during atrial pacing tachycardia in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:1661-1669.

44. Miller RR, Vismara LA, Williams DO, Amsterdam EA, Mason DT. Pharmacologic mechanisms for left ventricular unloading in clinical congestive heart failure: differential effects of nitroprusside, phentolamine, and nitroglycerin on cardiac function and peripheral circulation. Circ Res. 1976;39:127-133. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Stern MA, Gohlke HK, Loeb HS, Croke RP, Gunnar RM. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous phentolamine in low output cardiac failure. Circulation. 1978;58:157-163. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Gould L, Reddy CVR. Phentolamine. Am Heart J. 1976;92:397-402. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
W. S. Akers and L. A. Cassis
Presynaptic modulation of evoked NE release contributes to sympathetic activation after pressure overload
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): H2151 - H2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. M. Small, L. E. Wagoner, A. M. Levin, S. L.R. Kardia, and S. B. Liggett
Synergistic Polymorphisms of {beta}1- and {alpha}2C-Adrenergic Receptors and the Risk of Congestive Heart Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., October 10, 2002; 347(15): 1135 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.F. Notarius, E.R. Azevedo, J.D. Parker, and J.S. Floras
Peak oxygen uptake is not determined by cardiac noradrenaline spillover in heart failure
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2002; 23(10): 800 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Aggarwal, M. D. Esler, F. Socratous, and D. M. Kaye
Evidence for functional presynaptic alpha-2 adrenoceptors and their down-regulation in human heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1246 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. F. Notarius and J. S. Floras
Limitations of the use of spectral analysis of heart rate variability for the estimation of cardiac sympathetic activity in heart failure
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
O.-E. Brodde and M. C. Michel
Adrenergic and Muscarinic Receptors in the Human Heart
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 51(4): 651 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. E. Newton, E. R. Azevedo, and J. D. Parker
Inotropic and Sympathetic Responses to the Intracoronary Infusion of a ß2-Receptor Agonist : A Human In Vivo Study
Circulation, May 11, 1999; 99(18): 2402 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. R. Azevedo, G. E. Newton, and J. D. Parker
Cardiac and systemic sympathetic activity in response to clonidine in human heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 186 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. C. Lang, C. M. Stein, R. A. Nelson, H. B. He, F. J. Belas, I. A. Blair, M. Wood, and A. J. J. Wood
Sympathoinhibitory Response to Clonidine Is Blunted in Patients With Heart Failure
Hypertension, September 1, 1997; 30(3): 392 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. E. Newton and J. D. Parker
Acute Effects of ß1-Selective and Nonselective ß-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade on Cardiac Sympathetic Activity in Congestive Heart Failure
Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 353 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. L. Stiles
`A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery Inside an Enigma' : Winston S. Churchill, October 1, 1939
Circulation, October 1, 1995; 92(7): 1678 - 1679.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, W. S.