Circulation. 1995;92:2033-2035
(Circulation. 1995;92:2033-2035.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Angina Pectoris and Disease Progression
Erling Falk, MD, PhD;
Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD
From Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD, Director, Cardiovascular
Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Pl, Box 1030, New
York, NY 10029-6574.
Key Words: Editorials angina angiography plaque prognosis
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
A seemingly paradoxical finding for
years puzzled cardiologists
who were engaged in evaluating
coronary angiograms: the number
and severity of
coronary stenoses were similar in patients with
stable
and unstable angina, despite the worse short-term prognosis
of the
latter.
1 2 In 1985, Ambrose et al
3 offered an
explanation
that since has been confirmed by many others: the
difference
between these two ischemic syndromes relates to the
morphology
of the culprit lesion rather than the number and severity of
coronary
stenoses. The distinct angiographic morphology
characteristically
seen in unstable angina was originally classified as
a type
II eccentric lesion and described as "an asymmetric
stenosis
usually in the form of a convex intraluminal
obstruction with
a narrow base or neck, due to one or more overhanging
edges
or borders that were very irregular or
scalloped."
3 Culprit
stenoses in unstable
angina, however, are not necessarily eccentric,
and the term
"complex" lesions is now generally preferred. Postmortem
studies
and coronary angioscopy in living patients have revealed
that
plaque disruption, often with superimposed nonocclusive
thrombosis, is
usually responsible for the "complex" morphology
seen by
angiography.
4 5 6
In patients with angina pectoris, previous studies on
short-term prognosis have focused primarily on unstable
angina-producing stenoses, ie, culprit lesions. Patients
with stable or unstable angina pectoris, however, have many nonculprit
plaques in their coronary arteries that could also influence
the prognosis. Nonetheless, not much attention has been paid to
nonculprit plaques in such patients. Therefore, the approach taken by
Kaski, Chen, and colleagues,7 8 assessing the entire
coronary tree rather than just looking for culprit lesions, is
sound, and the results reported in this and a recent issue of
Circulation illustrate clearly that the "conventional
medical therapy" usually offered patients with angina pectoris is
far from optimal.
 |
Disease Progression in Patients in the United Kingdom
Awaiting Angioplasty
|
|---|
Kaski et al,
7 from St George's Hospital in London,
UK, took
advantage of the situation at their institution (relatively
long
waiting period for nonurgent coronary angioplasty) and
prospectively
assessed disease progression in 94 patients with angina
pectoris
who were considered "stable" and were therefore put on a
waiting
list for routine coronary angioplasty. At study entry,
63 patients
presented with chronic stable angina and 31 had
unstable angina
(rest angina in 20), which rapidly resolved with
conventional
medical therapy. Several high-risk subgroups, such as
patients
with postinfarction angina and patients with significant left
main
or left main equivalent disease or >80% preseptal left anterior
descending
coronary stenosis, were excluded from the
study. Disease progression
was assessed by computerized angiography in
217 analyzable stenoses
(2.3 per patient) showing >30%
diameter reduction at baseline
examination. Repeat coronary
arteriography was performed 2 to
12 months later (mean, 8 months),
immediately preceding the
scheduled angioplasty in 68 patients who
remained stable during
follow-up and after an acute
coronary event in the remaining
26 patients (myocardial
infarction in 4; no deaths).
At baseline examination, 36% of the 217 stenoses were
classified as "complex" and 64% were "smooth." Complex
stenoses were more frequent in patients presenting with
unstable angina than in patients with chronic stable angina: 47%
versus 30% of stenoses. Separate analyses for culprit
and nonculprit lesions are not given. At follow-up, 11% of the 217
preexisting stenoses progressed in 24% of patients.
Progression occurred in 22% of the complex stenoses and in 4%
of the smooth lesions. Of the stenoses that progressed, 65%
developed total occlusion. Acute coronary events occurred in
57% of progressors and 18% of nonprogressors. Although clinically
stabilized, patients presenting with unstable angina fared worse
than patients with chronic stable angina (stenosis progression,
48% versus 13%; new acute event, 55% versus 14%). Both complex and
smooth lesions appeared to progress more in "stabilized" unstable
angina compared with stable angina (complex, 30% versus 14%; smooth,
10% versus 2%), and complex lesions progressed more than smooth
lesions in both syndromes.
The authors conclude that (1) rapid stenosis progression is not
uncommon in patients awaiting elective coronary angioplasty;
(2) complex stenoses are at higher risk of rapid progression
than smooth lesions; and (3) patients who present with unstable
angina are likely to develop rapid stenosis progression and
further events, even when their symptoms settle rapidly with medical
therapy.
 |
High Frequency of Complex Lesions and Their Progression in Stable
Angina Pectoris and in "Stabilized" Unstable Angina
|
|---|
Complex lesions are much more common in patients with angina
pectoris
than one would expect from evaluating culprit stenoses
alone.
Previous studies indicate that only 10% to 20% of culprit
lesions
are complex in stable angina, but in the present study, as
many
as 42 complex lesions were found in 63 such patients. In unstable
angina,
fewer than 75% of culprit lesions are usually classified as
complex,
3 8 but this study identified 37 complex
stenoses in 31 patients
who presented with unstable
angina.
7 Although many acute lesions
are probably missed
by coronary angiography, these results substantiate
previous
observations made at autopsy: during atherogenesis,
plaque disruption
and rapid plaque growth occur frequently and
usually
asymptomatically.
9 10 11
The present study7 confirms that complex morphology,
irrespective of the ischemic syndrome, is an important factor
in the progression of coronary stenoses.12
The novel observation is that a sizable proportion of patients who are
clinically stable harbor complex lesions at relatively high risk of
rapid progression. In patients with stable angina, 6% of the
stenoses (6 complex and 2 smooth) progressed, and 14% of the
patients developed an acute coronary event (2 myocardial
infarctions). In contrast, in patients with "stabilized" unstable
angina, 19% of the stenoses (11 complex and 4 smooth)
progressed, and 55% of the patients developed an acute
coronary event (2 myocardial infarctions). These are
surprisingly high figures, considering that a favorable response to
medical therapy usually identifies a low-risk subgroup of patients
with unstable angina.13 During an 8-month follow-up
previously reported,8 25% of culprit lesions progressed
versus 7% of nonculprit lesions. Thus, new clinical events are not
necessarily due to disease "reactivation" at the site of the
original culprit lesion. More diffuse disease activity may, in fact,
characterize many patients with unstable angina, before unstable
symptoms arise. Ambrose et al14 restudied 46 patients with
angina pectoris and found progression of coronary disease in
76% of patients who developed unstable angina (mean follow-up, 30
months), and 21% of the progressors showed disease progression in more
than one vessel.
 |
Mechanisms of Disease Progression
|
|---|
Do culprit stenoses responsible for unstable angina
subsequently
regress due to endogenous
thrombolysis and remodeling, as culprit
lesions usually do
in myocardial infarction,
15 16 or do they
heal by smooth
muscle proliferation and matrix synthesisas
a
response-to-injury mechanism, thrombosis, or
bothresulting
in further short-term plaque growth and
stenosis progression?
17 In the present
study,
7 including both stable and "stabilized"
patients,
only one nonspecified lesion regressed. In the previously
reported
study,
8 including "stabilized" unstable
angina, only three
nonspecified lesions regressed, whereas 25% of the
culprit lesions
progressed during an 8-month follow-up. Thus, the
culprit lesions
responsible for unstable angina often progress further
in the
short term and rarely regress. These results, together with
the
lack of substantial improvement in lumen diameter by
thrombolytic
therapy in most patients with unstable
angina,
18 19 indicate
that thrombus is rarely bulky in
lesions responsible for this
syndrome, as it usually is in
infarct-related lesions. Nonetheless,
thrombosis does play a
dominant role in plaque progression for
months after
"stabilization," indicated by the high short-term
occlusion
rate; 65% of the stenoses that progressed in the present
study
developed into total occlusion, including all 10 stenoses
>50%
that progressed.
7 As previously noted, the greater
the preexisting
stenosis, the higher the risk of progression to
thrombotic occlusion.
8 20 21 Appropriate antithrombotic
therapy, also after "stabilization,"
may hold the key to keeping
the vessel open not only during
hospitalization for unstable angina but
also after hospital
discharge.
22 It remains uncertain
whether the mechanism responsible
for rapid disease progression is the
same in patients who present
with unstable angina and patients with
chronic stable angina.
22
 |
Present Medical Therapy Does Not Totally Stabilize or Prevent
Progression of the Complex Lesions: A Role for Aggressive Risk
Factor Modification?
|
|---|
In the present study,
7 conventional medical
treatment in the
form of antianginal therapy (combinations of calcium
antagonists,
nitrates, and ß-blockers) and
low-dose aspirin (75 to
150 mg/d) stabilized all the patients, but
it did not control
the underlying coronary artery disease.
During the 8-month follow-up,
the progression rate was high in both
stable angina (13%) and
"stabilized" unstable angina (48%),
although relatively few
patients developed serious clinical events (4
myocardial infarctions,
no deaths). Nearly half of the progressors
remained clinically
stable (silent progression). Fifteen patients
developed total
coronary occlusion, of which 6 passed
unnoticed. Importantly,
progression was not confined to culprit
lesions, which clearly
illustrates that atherosclerosis
is a multifocal disease with
many minor but potentially dangerous
plaques for every obstructive
plaque. Obviously, more needs to be done
to stabilize not only
the patients but also the underlying disease
process itself.
Of importance, the high rate of progression in the present study
may reflect patient selection. All the patients had such severe
coronary artery disease that angioplasty was considered
necessary. However, the lack of disease control could also relate to
(1) the high proportion of smokers (62%), (2) the relatively high
serum cholesterol level (mean, 6.4 mmol/L), and (3) the
weak antithrombotic regimen (aspirin 75 to 150 mg/d). Regarding
smoking, angiographic studies in stable patients have shown a strong
association between smoking and progression of coronary artery
disease.23 24 Regarding cholesterol, all
patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs were excluded from the
study, and the included patients had relatively high serum
cholesterol levels. Recent clinical trials have now
convincingly shown that patients with coronary artery disease
and high serum cholesterol levels benefit from effective
cholesterol-lowering therapy; both disease
progression and acute clinical events are markedly
reduced,25 26 27 and the two phenomena are clearly
related.22 28 Regarding antithrombotic therapy,
low-dose aspirin alone may not be enough in patients with active
coronary disease. Stronger antiplatelet agents or
combined low-dose aspirin and low-intensity anticoagulation may
prove to be more effective in preventing disease progression,
particularly the progression to total coronary occlusion that
was so frequently observed in the present study.7
Overall, it may be time to reconsider whether "conventional medical
therapy," as given in the present study, is the best way of
treating patients in whom the disease has progressed so far that
coronary revascularization is contemplated.
Compelling scientific evidence demonstrates that comprehensive
risk-factor interventions decrease the need for
revascularization procedures and prevent heart
attack and death in patients with coronary artery
disease.29
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily
those of the editors or of the American Heart Association, Inc.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Fuster V, Frye RL, Connoll DC, Danielson MA,
Elveback LR, Kurland LT. Arteriographic patterns early in the
onset of the coronary syndromes. Br Heart J. 1975;37:1250-1255. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Alison HW, Russell RO Jr, Mantle JA, Kouchoukos NT,
Moraski RE, Rackley CE. Coronary anatomy and
arteriography in patients with unstable angina pectoris.
Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:204-209. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Stern A, Eng A, Teichholz LE,
Gorlin R, Fuster V. Angiographic morphology and the pathogenesis
of unstable angina pectoris. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1985;5:609-616. [Abstract]
-
Levin DC, Fallon JT. Significance of the
angiographic morphology of localized coronary stenoses:
histopathologic correlations. Circulation. 1982;66:316-320. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Forrester JS, Litvack F, Grundfest W, Hickey A.
A perspective of coronary disease seen through the
arteries of living man. Circulation. 1987;75:505-513. [Free Full Text]
-
Mizuno K, Miyamoto A, Satomura K, Kurita A, Arai T,
Sakurada M, Yanagida S, Nakamura H. Angioscopic coronary
macromorphology in patients with acute coronary
disorders. Lancet. 1991;337:809-812. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kaski JC, Chester MR, Chen L, Katritsis D.
Rapid angiographic progression of coronary artery
disease in patients with angina pectoris: the role of complex
stenosis morphology. Circulation. 1995;92:2058-2065. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen L, Chester MR, Redwood S, Huang J, Leatham E,
Kaski JC. Angiographic stenosis progression and
coronary events in patients with `stabilized' unstable angina
pectoris. Circulation. 1995;91:2319-2324. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Falk E. Plaque rupture with severe
pre-existing stenosis precipitating coronary
thrombosis: characteristics of coronary atherosclerotic plaques
underlying fatal occlusive thrombi. Br Heart J. 1983;50:127-134. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Davies MJ, Bland JM, Hangartner JRW, Angelini A,
Thomas AC. Factors influencing the presence or absence of
acute coronary artery thrombi in sudden ischaemic
death. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:203-208. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Frink RJ. Chronic ulcerated plaques: new
insights into the pathogenesis of acute coronary
disease. J Invas Cardiol. 1994;6:173-185. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ellis S, Alderman EL, Cain K, Wright A, Bourassa M,
Fisher L. Morphology of left anterior descending
coronary territory lesion as a predictor of anterior myocardial
infarction: a CASS Registry Study. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1989;13:1481-1491. [Abstract]
-
Lindenfeld J, Morrison DA. Toward a stable
clinical classification of unstable angina. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1293-1294. Editorial. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Arora RR, Eng A, Riccio A,
Gorlin R, Fuster V. Angiographic evolution of coronary
artery morphology in unstable angina. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1986;7:472-478. [Abstract]
-
Veen G, Meijer A, Werter CJPJ, de Swart H, Verheugt
FWA. Dynamic changes of culprit lesion morphology and severity
after successful thrombolysis for acute myocardial
infarction: an angiographic follow-up study. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;February:147A. Abstract.
-
Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon J, Chesebro JH. The
pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute
coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:242-250, 310-318. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Flugelman MY, Virmani R, Correa R, Yu Z-X, Farb A, Leon
MB, Elami A, Fu Y-M, Casscells W, Epstein SE. Smooth muscle cell
abundance and fibroblast growth factors in coronary lesions of
patients with nonfatal unstable angina: a clue to the mechanism of
transformation from the stable to the unstable clinical state.
Circulation. 1993;88:2493-2500. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ambrose JA, Hjemdahl-Monsen C, Borrico S, Sherman W,
Cohen M, Gorlin R, Fuster V. Quantitative and qualitative
effects of intracoronary streptokinase in unstable angina
and non-Q wave infarction. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1987;9:1156-1165. [Abstract]
-
The TIMI IIIA Investigators. Early effects of
tissue-type plasminogen activator added to
conventional therapy on the culprit coronary lesions in
patients presenting with ischemic cardiac pain at rest:
results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia
(TIMI IIIA) Trial. Circulation. 1993;87:38-52. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ellis S, Alderman E, Cain K, Fisher L, Sanders W,
Bourassa M, and the CASS Investigators. Prediction of risk of
anterior myocardial infarction by lesion severity and measurement
method of stenoses in the left anterior descending
coronary distribution: a CASS Registry Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:908-916. [Abstract]
-
Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, Chaitman BR, Faxon
DP, Foster ED, Killip T, Sosa JA, Bourassa MG, CASS Participating
Investigators and Staff. Five-year angiographic
follow-up of factors associated with progression of
coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery
Study (CASS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1141-1154. [Abstract]
-
Fuster V. Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture:
Mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction: insights from studies of
vascular biology. Circulation. 1994;90:2126-2146. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lichtlen PR, Nikutta P, Jost S, Deckers J, Wiese B,
Rafflenbeul W, the INTACT Study Group. Anatomical progression of
coronary artery disease in humans as seen by prospective,
repeated, quantitated coronary angiography: relation to
clinical events and risk factors.
Circulation. 1992;86:828-838. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Waters D, Higginson L, Gladstone P, Boccuzzi S, Cook T,
Lesperance J. Smoking accelerates the progression of
coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by serial
quantitative coronary arteriography.
Circulation. 1993;88(suppl I):I-344. Abstract.
-
Blankenhorn DH, Hodis HN. Arterial
imaging and atherosclerosis reversal.
Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:177-192. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Group. Baseline serum cholesterol and treatment
effect in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
(4S). Lancet. 1995;345:1274-1275. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jukema JW, Bruschke AVG, van Boven AJ, Reiber JHC, Bal
ET, Zwinderman AH, Jansen H, Boerma GJM, van Rappard RM, Lie KI, on
behalf of the REGRESS Study Group. Effects of lipid lowering by
pravastatin on progression and regression of
coronary artery disease in symptomatic men with
normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels: the
Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS).
Circulation. 1995;91:2528-2540. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brown BG, Zhao XQ, Sacco DE, Albers JJ. Lipid
lowering and plaque regression: new insights into prevention of plaque
disruption and clinical events in coronary disease (based on
FATS and other studies). Circulation. 1993;87:1781-1791. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith SC, Blair SN, Criqui MH, Fletcher GF, Fuster V,
Gersh BJ, Gotto AM, Gould L, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hill MN, Hlatky
MA, Houston-Miller N, Krauss RM, LaRosa J, Ockene IS, Oparil S, Pearson
RA, Rapaport E, Starke RD, the Secondary Prevention Panel.
Preventing heart attack and death in patients with
coronary disease (Consensus Panel Statement).
Circulation. 1995;92:2-4.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A F Kopp, A Kuttner, T Trabold, M Heuschmid, S Schroder, and C D Claussen
Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography
Br. J. Radiol.,
December 1, 2004;
77(suppl_1):
S87 - S97.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Ketterer, G. Mahr, J. J. Cao, M. Hudson, S. Smith, and W. Knysz
What's "Unstable" in Unstable Angina?
Psychosomatics,
June 1, 2004;
45(3):
185 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Bertrand, M. L. Simoons, K. A.A. Fox, L. C. Wallentin, C. W. Hamm, E. McFadden, P. J. De Feyter, G. Specchia, and W. Ruzyllo
Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
Eur. Heart J.,
December 1, 2002;
23(23):
1809 - 1840.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.B Smith, F.G.R Fowkes, A Rumley, A.J Lee, G.D.O Lowe, and C.M Hau
Tissue plasminogen activator and leucocyte elastase as predictors of cardiovascular events in subjects with angina pectoris: Edinburgh Artery Study
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2000;
21(19):
1607 - 1613.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.E Bertrand, M.L Simoons, K.A.A Fox, L.C Wallentin, C.W Hamm, E McFadden, P.J de Feyter, G Specchia, and W Ruzyllo
Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology: Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J.,
September 1, 2000;
21(17):
1406 - 1432.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Altman, J. Rouvier, and A. Scazziota
State-of-the-Art Review : Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction: Beneficial Effect of Combining Oral Anticoagulant Plus Aspirin: Therapy Based on Evidence
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis,
July 1, 2000;
6(3):
126 - 134.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Stefanadis, L. Diamantopoulos, C. Vlachopoulos, E. Tsiamis, J. Dernellis, K. Toutouzas, E. Stefanadi, and P. Toutouzas
Thermal Heterogeneity Within Human Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries Detected In Vivo : A New Method of Detection by Application of a Special Thermography Catheter
Circulation,
April 20, 1999;
99(15):
1965 - 1971.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. van der Wal and A. E. Becker
Atherosclerotic plaque rupture - pathologic basis of plaque stability and instability
Cardiovasc Res,
February 1, 1999;
41(2):
334 - 344.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Guazzi, M. Bussotti, L. Grancini, N. De Cesare, M. Guazzi, I. L. Pera, and A. Loaldi
Evidence of Multifocal Activity of Coronary Disease in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation,
August 19, 1997;
96(4):
1145 - 1151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|