| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1995;92:2157-2162.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (J.A.R., D.B.S., R.S.S.), Diagnostic Radiology (P.F.S.), and Endocrinology and Internal Medicine (L.A.F.), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to John A. Rumberger, PhD, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Thirty-eight coronary arteries from 13 autopsy hearts were dissected, straightened, and scanned with EBCT in 3-mm contiguous increments. Coronary calcium area was defined as one or more pixels with a density >130 Hounsfield units (0.18 mm2/pixel). Each artery was divided into corresponding 3-mm segments, representative histological sections were stained, and atherosclerotic plaque area per segment (mm2) was quantified. Coronary artery calcium and coronary artery plaque areas were correlated for the hearts as a whole, for individual coronary arteries, and for individual coronary artery segments. The sums of histological plaque areas versus the sums of calcium areas were highly correlated for each heart and for each coronary artery. However, coronary plaque area was on the order of five times greater than calcium area. Furthermore, minimal diffuse segmental coronary plaque could be present despite the absence of coronary calcium detectable by EBCT.
Conclusions This histopathologic study confirms an intimate relation between whole heart, coronary artery, and segmental coronary atherosclerotic plaque area and EBCT coronary calcium area but suggests that there is a threshold value for plaque area below which coronary calcium is either absent or not detectable by this methodology.
Key Words: calcium arteries tomography atherosclerosis diagnosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies from our laboratories20 21 and others22 23 have shown that arterial calcium development is intimately associated with vascular injury and atherosclerotic plaque development. We hypothesized that coronary artery calcium area quantified by EBCT would directly correlate with coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. To address this, we examined coronary artery specimens from 13 adult autopsy hearts scanned by EBCT in which quantitative measures of atherosclerotic plaque area were available.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EBCT Scanner
EBCT (Ultrafast CT, Imatron C-100) can acquire
consecutive
ECG-triggered, contiguous, thin-slice tomograms at a rate of 40
images in as many seconds. For the present study, 100-ms,
consecutive, 3-mm-thick tomograms were acquired by manual trigger
with a 22-cm field of view and a matrix size of
512x512.5 6 Individual in-plane pixel
dimensions were
0.43x0.43 mm (0.18 mm2/pixel).
EBCT Evaluation of Coronary Artery Segments
Methods for
scanning and analysis of coronary
artery luminal area narrowing as it relates to EBCT coronary
calcium have been reported previously from this data
set.5 6 In brief, sets of 3-mm-thick, contiguous EBCT
scans were acquired perpendicular to each coronary artery cross
section, with the most proximal image commencing at the anatomic origin
of each artery. The left main artery was considered part of the left
anterior descending coronary artery. Each EBCT image was
analyzed with imaging software supplied by the manufacturer.
From each scan, the examiner was able to identify and visually inscribe
a region of interest that contained the tomographic coronary
cross section. The image processing software then automatically
searched the inscribed region of interest and determined the CT density
of the individual pixels within the region. The presence of
coronary artery calcium was defined as any pixel within the
region of interest with a CT density >130 Hounsfield units in a
fashion similar to that used
previously.1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Scan data for
each dissected artery usually consisted of 30 consecutive images, each
3 mm thick. For each individual coronary segment in each
tomographic section, the tomographic area (0.18
mm2/pixel) with a CT density >130 Hounsfield units
was determined and designated the "calcium area" for that
coronary segment.
Histopathologic Examination of Coronary
Segments
Immediately after scanning, the arteries remained pinned to
the
backboard while 3-mm sections of coronary arteries
(corresponding to the 3-mm CT images) were cut and labeled. From each
of the 3-mm coronary artery segments, a
"representative" (random) 5-µm-thick
section was prepared for microscopic analysis from the middle
of each respective segment. Each histological section
was stained with hematoxylin-eosin and elasticvan Gieson
stains. Histological sectioning continued up to
9 cm
for each artery or until the artery diameter was too small to sample
properly. One artery was damaged during sectioning. From the remaining
38 coronary arteries, a total of 522
histological sections were prepared. The presence and
extent of coronary atherosclerotic disease in each
coronary histological section was quantified by
planimetry using light microscopy. It is difficult, in the presence of
variable degrees of atherosclerotic involvement, to reliably define
the extent of the original (nondiseased) coronary lumen.
Although it does not precisely define the nondiseased vessel
dimensions, for consistency and in keeping with methods
used in previous studies,5 6 the area of the
"original" coronary lumen was defined as the area
inscribed by the internal elastic lamina. In areas in which the
integrity of the internal elastic lamina was damaged or was not readily
apparent, an arc representing this portion of the
circumference was visually interpolated from adjacent areas in which
the internal elastic lamina was visible. The boundaries of the residual
(diseased) lumen per section were then planimetered, and the area (in
square millimeters) of atherosclerotic plaque was defined as the area
of the original, nondiseased lumen minus the area of the residual,
diseased lumen. Additionally, the percent luminal cross-sectional
area obstructed by atherosclerotic disease was calculated between 0%
and 100%. There were 522 histological segments and 522
corresponding CT segments. Analysis of the
histological sections was done randomly and blinded to
the CT analysis. Data were related for calcium area and plaque
area for coronary segments, for individual coronary
arteries, and for whole-heart coronary artery systems.
Statistics
Data are presented as mean±SD for
calcium/plaque areas.
Correlations between the square root of histological
plaque area and the square root of coronary artery calcium area
by EBCT were made by use of a linear model and definition of 95% CIs.
The square-root transform was used to minimize the effects of data
skewness (nonnormal distribution) on the correlations.7
Statistical significance of correlations was determined by Pearson's
moment method. A one-way ANOVA followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls
t test was used to determine significance for multiple
thresholds of segmental atherosclerotic plaque area versus segmental
coronary calcium area. Statistical significance
(two-tailed) was assumed for P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20% but <50%, n=100 (19%) with stenoses
50% but <75%, and n=62 (12%) with stenoses
75%. When
the extent of luminal narrowing per individual heart was examined,
there were only 2 individuals in whom all sections evaluated showed
histological grade 0 (ie, 0% stenosis)
disease. There was 1 heart in which the maximum stenosis in any
coronary segment examined was
20%. In 2 patients, maximum
stenoses were between 20% and 50%; in 4, maximum
coronary stenoses were between 50% and 75%; and in 4,
maximum stenoses were >75% of lumen area.
The histological (internal
elastic lamina) mean for the
areas inscribed across the 522 sections evaluated was 5.32±4.17
mm2, with a range of 0.2 to 22.6 mm2.
The vessel segments examined reflected both proximal and distal areas
of the coronary arteries. These data indicated, with
reservations as noted above, an estimation of the original, nondiseased
lumen diameter (assuming a circular cross section) of between 0.5 and
5.4 mm. Residual, diseased, mean cross-sectional lumen areas
were 2.67±2.23 mm2, with a range of 0 to 13.68
mm2. Mean total "plaque" areas were 2.65±2.83
mm2, with a range of 0 to 16.1 mm2. The
mean cross-sectional area occupied by plaque across the 522
sections was 56.97%.
Of the corresponding 522 EBCT coronary segments examined, 331 (63%) had no detectable coronary artery calcium. The remaining segments had coronary calcium areas ranging from 0.18 to 4.3 mm2.
Correlation of Whole-Heart Coronary Calcium and
Plaque Areas
The square roots of the total (summed, whole-heart)
coronary CT calcium and total (summed, whole-heart)
histological plaque areas were correlated for the 13
individual hearts as shown in Fig 1
(r=.93,
P<.001). Average whole-heart, summed
histological coronary plaque area was
133.2±158.2 mm2 (range, 1.3 to 510.5 mm2), and
average whole-heart, summed calcium area by CT was 22.9±36.1
mm2 (range, 0 to 112.2 mm2). Thus, the average
whole-coronary-system calcium area by EBCT was on the
order of one fifth the average total histological
atherosclerotic plaque area.
|
Correlation of Individual Coronary Artery Calcium and
Plaque Areas
Proximal portions of the left anterior descending
(including left
main), left circumflex, and right coronary arteries were
examined in each heart. Thirty-eight individual coronary
arteries were evaluated for total atherosclerotic plaque area and
corresponding total EBCT coronary calcium area. The average sum
of plaque areas per coronary artery was 45.5±57.4
mm2 (range, 0.6 to 193 mm2), and the average
sum of calcium areas per coronary artery was 7.9±13.4
mm2 (range, 0 to 46.4 mm2). As before, the
average sum of individual coronary calcium areas estimated by
EBCT was on the order of one fifth the average sum of the corresponding
histological plaque areas. Linear correlation of the
square root of the sum of CT calcium areas (x) with the
square root of the sum of histological plaque areas
(y) and the 95% confidence limits of the estimate
for the 38 individual coronary arteries are shown in Fig 2
.
Correlations were statistically significant
(r=.90, P<.001).
|
Segmental Coronary Artery Calcium and Plaque
Areas
Fig 2
demonstrates a direct association between
total
histological coronary artery plaque area and
EBCT coronary calcium area. However, several arteries had
demonstrable atherosclerotic plaque but little or no associated
coronary calcium. In particular, one artery exhibited a
substantial amount of total plaque area (22.6 mm2) but zero
detectable calcium by EBCT (data point at upper left y scale
of Fig 2
). Fig 3
shows segmental coronary plaque
area and the corresponding segmental coronary calcium area from
that individual artery (ie, statistical outlier) as a function of
distance from the coronary ostium. As shown, there is obvious
diffuse coronary plaque and no associated segmental
coronary calcium detected by EBCT. In this example, the
segmental plaque area varied generally around 3 to 4
mm2, and in only two segments was the plaque area
>5 mm2.
|
Fig 4
shows data presented in the
format shown
in Fig 3
but from another coronary artery. Here, although
plaque areas were always greater than calcium areas, there was a
general concordance between the distribution of segmental plaque and
segmental calcium as one proceeded distally from the coronary
ostium. Additionally, in most instances, segmental plaque areas >5
mm2 were associated with segmental coronary calcium
areas >1 mm2. When segmental plaque area fell below
5
mm2, the segmental calcium area was generally 1
mm2 or less. The examples from two extremes shown in Figs
3
and 4
suggested that there could possibly be a
threshold for segmental
coronary plaque area below which little or no associated
coronary calcium is detectable by EBCT.
|
Fig 5
is a bar
graph of segmental atherosclerotic plaque
areas and associated segmental coronary calcium areas for the
522 separate histological CT correlates. As
atherosclerotic plaque area increased, coronary calcium area
increased, as would have been predicted from the data given in Figs
1
and 2
. However, for plaque areas <1
mm2, the EBCT
coronary calcium areas were nearly zero. For plaque areas of 1
to 5 mm2, the mean calcium area was 0.46
mm2. Only when the coronary plaque areas were
consistently in the range of 5 to 10 mm2 per
segment were the corresponding coronary calcium areas, on
average, >1 mm2. The value of 1-mm2
coronary calcium area has an important clinical correlate. For
many clinical EBCT studies, imaging is done with a 30-cm field of view.
With a standard 512x512 matrix, pixel areas are
0.34
mm2. A criterion of two contiguous pixels with a CT density
of >130 (minimal area size of 0.68 mm2) has been used in
previous clinical studies from our laboratory and
others.1 2 3 4 However,
recent data suggest that this minimal
calcium area may be too small for consistently reproducible
results in patients.24 Using a requirement of three (1.03
mm2) or four (1.37 mm2) contiguous pixels may
be more reliable for clinical studies. The present data suggest
that using these minimal amounts of discrete calcification in patients
is most consistently associated with atherosclerotic plaques of
5 mm2 or larger but cannot reliably detect plaques of
smaller segmental areas.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three major conclusions
from the present investigation can be added
to those stated above. First, coronary calcium area per
individual coronary artery and/or per whole heart as defined by
EBCT is highly correlated with histologically
quantified coronary plaque area (Figs 1
and 2
).
Second,
coronary calcium as measured by EBCT, according to the criteria
used in the present study, defines on average only about one fifth
the total atherosclerotic plaque present at
histological examination. There is increasing evidence
that formation of calcium as associated with atherosclerotic disease in
the form of calcium hydroxyapatite27 is an active process
either regulated by "calcifying vascular cells"22 or
associated with smooth muscle cell or macrophage
production of ectopic bone matrix
proteins.20 21 23 Atherosclerotic plaque
consists of a
variety of amorphous materials, including fibrous debris,
cholesterol lakes, and matrix materials such as calcium,
and is characterized by smooth muscle cell proliferation. It is
therefore not surprising that coronary calcium is related to
the total area of the composite atherosclerotic "plaque"; but not
all plaques contain calcium, and there may be some "threshold"
for plaque composition that then is associated with coronary
calcium detected by EBCT. Thus, on the whole, defining coronary
calcium in this manner would appear to relate to only a portion of the
atherosclerotic plaque actually present. Coronary calcium
by EBCT could be interpreted as looking at only "the tip of the
atherosclerotic iceberg." Although intravascular ultrasound is
perhaps the best method available at present to quantify local
atherosclerotic disease, it is used only as an adjunct in invasive
coronary angiography, and only in certain circumstances. Since
it provides information on the atherosclerotic process, quantification
of coronary calcium by EBCT, on the other hand, may well be the
best noninvasive method currently available to identify the site and
potentially estimate (albeit probably underestimate) the extent of
mural coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Third, as shown in Fig
3
, diffuse, minimal segmental atherosclerotic disease can occur
without
coronary calcium detectable by EBCT. Furthermore, the data
suggest that a segmental coronary artery EBCT calcium area of 1
mm2, which, as previously noted, is also a practical
"threshold" for clinical studies, is most consistently
associated with a plaque area roughly fivefold greater in area. The
absence of coronary calcium by EBCT, therefore, does not rule
out the presence of atherosclerotic plaque, but once the segmental
plaque area has reached a certain size, coronary calcium area
by EBCT increases in a direct fashion with increasing atherosclerotic
plaque area, as shown in Figs 1
and 2
.
Clinical Implications
"Coronary remodeling"
associated with the
development and progression of atherosclerotic disease is a recently
described phenomenon whereby the luminal cross-sectional area
and/or external vessel dimensions enlarge in compensation for
increasing areas of mural plaque. Coronary artery calcium is an
intimate component of some plaques. In fact, Clarkson et
al,13 in a recent histopathologic investigation, showed
that plaques with microscopic evidence of mineralization were much
larger and were associated with much larger coronary arteries
than those sections without microscopic evidence of calcification. This
was true in humans and in nonhuman primates. The compensatory
enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary segments may explain
why coronary angiography frequently underestimates the severity
of coronary disease compared with histopathologic studies. This
fact may also help in explaining the positive but poor correlation of
coronary calcium with percent luminal stenosis in
earlier reports from our
laboratory.3 4 5 6
Prognostication in patients with atherosclerotic disease is not always best determined by the severity of angiographically defined luminal stenoses. In the seminal study by Little et al,28 coronary lesions resulting in plaque rupture and acute myocardial infarction were more likely angiographic lesions that represented only mild to moderate luminal obstruction. It is possible that prognosis is more closely related to the overall magnitude of atherosclerotic plaque "burden" within the coronary system than it is to single or multiple discrete luminal narrowing defined qualitatively by conventional coronary arteriography. The information contributed by the present study provides a foundation to expand the diagnostic and potentially prognostic potential for EBCT. Additionally, as imaging and software analysis methods improve, it is likely that progression26 and possibly regression of atherosclerotic plaque can be followed serially with EBCT; however, further studies are necessary to expand the present histopathologic study to the care of patients in the clinical arena. Angiographic end points for disease progression and regression have been used in prior studies, and yet, such applications, even with the addition of quantitative coronary angiography, are fraught with problems. A means to study progression of atherosclerotic plaque area in a large subset of the population would be superior to this conventional approach. As such, noninvasive definition of coronary calcium area by EBCT might be used as a surrogate for arteriography in examining disease progression in response to pharmacological therapy.
Limitations
Some of the methodological limitations of this
histopathologic
correlative study have been discussed previously.5 6
These
include the use of a single 5-µm histological sample
to quantify the extent of coronary disease compared with a
3-mm-thick CT coronary image and the fact that
coronary calcium defined by EBCT in this study cannot be
inferred to quantify the exact coronary calcium content of
precipitated calcium phosphate within that same coronary
section. Additionally, scanning of the coronary arteries in
direct cross section as done here cannot be duplicated easily in the
clinical setting, where partial-volume errors in determining
calcium mean and peak densities and total area may compound these
deficiencies.
Three additional study limitations require comment as
they relate to
interpretation of the data presented. First, the number of
hearts studied was small; however, the extent of histopathologic
coronary narrowing evaluated was reflective of a broad
distribution of luminal area stenoses that might be expected in
a clinical setting. Increasing the number of samples in the data set
may have allowed for a more uniform distribution of luminal narrowing
across all ranges noted above, but it is doubtful that the overall
conclusions of the investigation would be altered. Second, the
potential contributions of differential tissue (wall and lumen)
shrinkage as part of the processing of the autopsy specimens were not
accounted for in the present study. These consequences may confound
the interpretation of portions of the data. After fixation and
processing, Siegel et al29 found that the vessel wall area
changed little in segments with minimal atherosclerosis
but that it decreased significantly in the presence of moderate to
severe atherosclerosis. However, the changes in
(residual) lumen area with fixation and processing were just the
converse, with significant decreases only in the presence of minimal
atherosclerosis. Park et al30 found that
decreased lumen size and increased rigidity are induced by formalin
fixation in noncalcified femoral arteries but not in calcified
arteries. It is reasonable to assume that these effects would be
similar in the coronary arteries. Thus, at the time of
microscopic examination, these differential effects may cause calcified
arteries to appear less severely obstructed than noncalcified arteries.
Data from our previous publications and elsewhere basically have shown
that calcification increases as disease "severity" increases.
Thus, this information would imply that tissue fixation and processing
would have little effect on correlations of mural plaque with calcium
in segments with minimal disease. On the other hand, the segments with
more "disease" and thus more mural plaque may actually be
underestimated by correlations with EBCT calcification area. However,
to separate these issues out in our study would be extremely
problematic, since neither Siegel nor Park offered
solutions to this dilemma. Additionally, there could be differential
effects within the vessel wall, depending on the components or
compositions of the adventitia and media. Thus, to what extent these
limitations impact on the quantitative aspects of our study is
difficult to determine, but it is unlikely that they would alter the
qualitative implications of data presented in Figs 1 through
5![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Third, the present study used 3-mm-thick EBCT scans. A 1.5-mm
clinical scanning protocol for evaluation of coronary calcium
by EBCT has recently been introduced. Thinner EBCT scans may have
provided for a more quantitative method to define relations of calcium
areas to plaque areas. Although some sampling errors due to this
methodology could be anticipated, special efforts were made to be
consistent with image and histological sample
registration. The choice of 130 Hounsfield units as threshold to define
the presence of coronary artery calcium mimics the values
used in several previously published
studies.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 25 26
Higher values for threshold may increase specificity but probably would
have reduced sensitivity. The converse would be true if a lower
Hounsfield density value were used for a threshold.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 5, 1994; revision received April 10, 1995; accepted May 10, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Henneman, J. D. Schuijf, G. Pundziute, J. M. van Werkhoven, E. E. van der Wall, J. W. Jukema, and J. J. Bax Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 15, 2008; 52(3): 216 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I-C. Tsai, W.-L. Lee, C.-R. Tsao, Y. Chang, M.-C. Chen, T. Lee, and W.-C. Liao Comprehensive Evaluation of Ischemic Heart Disease Using MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 64 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. van Woudenbergh, R. Vliegenthart, F. J.A. van Rooij, A. Hofman, M. Oudkerk, J. C.M. Witteman, and J. M. Geleijnse Coffee Consumption and Coronary Calcification: The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 1018 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sorajja, A. S. Gami, V. K. Somers, T. R. Behrenbeck, A. Garcia-Touchard, and F. Lopez-Jimenez Independent Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease Chest, April 1, 2008; 133(4): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gottlieb and J. A.C. Lima Screening High-Risk Patients With Computed Tomography Angiography Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1318 - 1332. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. de Vos, M. Prokop, C. J. Roos, M. F.L. Meijs, Y. T. van der Schouw, A. Rutten, P. M. Gorter, M.-J. Cramer, P. A. Doevendans, B. J. Rensing, et al. Peri-coronary epicardial adipose tissue is related to cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcification in post-menopausal women Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Terashima, P. K. Nguyen, G. D. Rubin, C. Iribarren, B. K. Courtney, A. S. Go, S. P. Fortmann, and M. V. McConnell Impaired Coronary Vasodilation by Magnetic Resonance Angiography Is Associated With Advanced Coronary Artery Calcification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bamberg, N. Dannemann, M. D. Shapiro, S. K. Seneviratne, M. Ferencik, J. Butler, W. Koenig, K. Nasir, R. C. Cury, A. Tawakol, et al. Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Profiles and the Presence and Extent of Different Types of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque as Detected by Multidetector Computed Tomography Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): 568 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 531 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bansal and R. S. Blumenthal Total Coronary Artery Calcium Score Remains Preferred Metric to Refine Risk Prediction in Nearly All Patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 70 - 72. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y. Wong, N. Cheung, F. M. A. Islam, R. Klein, M. H. Criqui, M. F. Cotch, J. J. Carr, B. E. K. Klein, and A. R. Sharrett Relation of Retinopathy to Coronary Artery Calcification: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2008; 167(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kanno, T. Into, C. J. Lowenstein, and K. Matsushita Nitric oxide regulates vascular calcification by interfering with TGF-{beta} signalling Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2008; 77(1): 221 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bogazzi, L. Battolla, C. Spinelli, G. Rossi, S. Gavioli, V. Di Bello, C. Cosci, C. Sardella, D. Volterrani, E. Talini, et al. Risk Factors for Development of Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Acromegaly: A Five-Year Prospective Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4271 - 4277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Leontiev and T. J. Dubinsky CT-Based Calcium Scoring to Screen for Coronary Artery Disease: Why Aren't We There Yet? Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1061 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nasir, L. J. Shaw, S. T. Liu, S. R. Weinstein, T. R. Mosler, P. R. Flores, F. R. Flores, P. Raggi, D. S. Berman, R. S. Blumenthal, et al. Ethnic Differences in the Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcification for All-Cause Mortality J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 953 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nemcsik, K. Farkas, E. Kolossvary, Z. Jarai, J. Egresits, G. Borgulya, I. Kiss, and M. Lengyel Intracardiac Calcification Is a Marker of Generalized Atherosclerosis Angiology, September 1, 2007; 58(4): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Cassidy-Bushrow, L. F. Bielak, P. F. Sheedy II, S. T. Turner, I. J. Kullo, X. Lin, and P. A. Peyser Coronary Artery Calcification Progression Is Heritable Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 25 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Loria, K. Liu, C. E. Lewis, S. B. Hulley, S. Sidney, P. J. Schreiner, O. D. Williams, D. E. Bild, and R. Detrano Early Adult Risk Factor Levels and Subsequent Coronary Artery Calcification: The CARDIA Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2013 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, E. Boersma, A. J.H.A. Scholte, L. J.M. Kroft, E. E. van der Wall, and J. J. Bax Noninvasive Assessment of Plaque Characteristics With Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Symptomatic Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, May 1, 2007; 30(5): 1113 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schlosser, P. Hunold, T. Voigtlander, A. Schmermund, and J. Barkhausen Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Influence of Reconstruction Interval and Reconstruction Increment Using 64-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1063 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rozanski, H. Gransar, N. D. Wong, L. J. Shaw, R. Miranda-Peats, D. Polk, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, and D. S. Berman Clinical Outcomes After Both Coronary Calcium Scanning and Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1352 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||