(Circulation. 1995;92:2198-2203.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Cardiomyopathy Center, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Dr Wilson S. Colucci, Cardiomyopathy Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 80 E Concord St, Boston, MA 02118.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Patients with various degrees of LV dysfunction and free from epicardial coronary artery disease were instrumented with an infusion catheter in the left main coronary artery and a high-fidelity micromanometer-tipped catheter in the LV. Measurements included LV pressure, aortic pressure, heart rate, and LV peak +dP/dt. In eight subjects, dobutamine was infused via the left main coronary artery (25 or 50 µg/min) before and concurrent with intracoronary infusion of the NO synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 20 µmol/min for 10 minutes). In six other subjects, dobutamine was infused (6, 10, or 15 µg · kg-1 · min-1) via a peripheral vein. Intracoronary (n=8) dobutamine infusions increased LV peak +dP/dt by an average of 33±3%. The intracoronary infusion of L-NMMA had no effect on baseline LV peak +dP/dt, LV systolic or end-diastolic pressures, aortic pressure, or heart rate. The intracoronary infusion of L-NMMA, concurrent with a second infusion of dobutamine, potentiated the +dP/dt response to dobutamine by 30±10% (P<.04 versus dobutamine alone). The intracoronary infusion of L-NMMA likewise potentiated the +dP/dt response to the peripheral infusion of dobutamine by 37±18%.
Conclusions Nitric oxide produced in the heart attenuates the positive inotropic response to ß-adrenergic stimulation in humans with LV dysfunction. NO may contribute to ß-adrenergic hyporesponsiveness in patients with LV dysfunction.
Key Words: nervous system nitric oxide L-NMMA receptors adrenergic beta contractility heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO is a ubiquitous signaling molecule synthesized in the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline by a family of NOS enzymes that includes constitutive and inducible isoforms.7 In vitro studies in cultured cardiac myocytes8 9 10 11 12 13 and in vivo studies in laboratory animals8 14 15 have suggested that NO can attenuate the positive inotropic and chronotropic responses to ß-adrenergic agonists. The role of NO in the modulation of human myocardial responses is unknown, but several recent observations suggest that NO may be produced in human myocardium, particularly in the setting of myocardial dysfunction. First, NOS activity16 17 and mRNA18 19 can be demonstrated in myocardial samples from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy16 17 19 and cardiac allograft rejection.18 Second, the levels of inflammatory cytokines, which can induce the expression of NOS and increase NO production in several tissues, including myocardium,20 21 are elevated systemically22 23 and possibly in the myocardium24 25 of patients with LV dysfunction.
In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that NO attenuates the positive inotropic response to ß-adrenergic stimulation in humans. We examined the LV peak +dP/dt response to the ß-adrenergic agonist dobutamine, alone and during concurrent intracoronary infusion of L-NMMA, an inhibitor of NOS.26 When infused systemically, L-NMMA causes systemic hypertension and reflex sympathetic withdrawal.27 To avoid this confounding effect, L-NMMA was infused via the left main coronary artery. Patients with LV dysfunction were studied because in this setting ß-adrenergic responsiveness is frequently attenuated1 2 3 4 and there is circumstantial evidence to suggest increased NO activity.16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemodynamic Measurements
Before the experimental protocol was
begun, all subjects
underwent routine diagnostic left and right heart
catheterization via the femoral approach.
Coronary angiography was performed with nonionic contrast
media, and the research protocols were begun a minimum of 20 minutes
after completion of the diagnostic
catheterization. A 6F L4 Judkins catheter (Cordis
Laboratories) was advanced via the right femoral artery to the ostium
of the left main coronary artery. The catheter was continuously
flushed with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) containing heparin
infused at a rate of 2 mL/min. A 7F
micromanometer-tipped pigtail catheter (Millar
Instruments) was advanced from the opposite femoral artery and placed
in the LV for measurement of LV pressure. LV peak +dP/dt was computed
on-line, and femoral artery pressure was monitored via a 7F sidearm
sheath (Cordis Laboratories). The ECG, femoral artery pressure, LV
pressure, and LV peak +dP/dt were recorded on a strip-chart
recorder (Electronics for Medicine, Honeywell Inc). Each
measurement represents the mean of at least 10 consecutive
sinus beats, except +dP/dt, which was the average of at least 45
consecutive beats.
Drug Infusion Protocols
Drugs were infused into the left main
coronary
artery via the Judkins catheter with use of a Harvard pump. Heparin
(5000 U IV) was administered just prior to placement of the catheters.
Drugs were infused for 5 minutes, and hemodynamic
measurements were made during the last minute of each drug infusion. In
eight subjects, the sequence of drug infusions was as follows: (1)
D5W, the vehicle for intracoronary drugs, was
infused at a rate of 2 mL/min. (2) Dobutamine (Lilly Inc),
diluted in D5W, was infused at a rate of 25 or 50 µg/min.
The infusion rate was selected to increase peak +dP/dt by 30% to 50%
(25 µg/min in four subjects, 50 µg/min in four subjects). (3)
Dobutamine was discontinued and peak +dP/dt was monitored
for at least 5 minutes and until it returned to the baseline value. (4)
L-NMMA (Calbiochem) was infused at a rate of 20 µmol/min for 5
minutes. This infusion rate would yield a steady state coronary
artery concentration of 160 µmol/L at a left main coronary
artery blood flow rate of 125 mL/min. (5) The L-NMMA infusion was
continued and dobutamine was again infused for 5 minutes at
the same rate as the first dobutamine infusion. The L-NMMA
infusion was thus continued for a total of 10 minutes (total dose of 50
mg). At the completion of the drug infusions, radiographic
contrast was injected into the infusion catheter to confirm the
continued position of the catheter in the left main coronary
ostium.
In six additional patients, dobutamine was delivered by a peripheral vein to ensure that the observed hemodynamic changes were independent of alterations in intracoronary dobutamine concentration that might be induced by the inhibition of NOS. Peripheral infusion of dobutamine should result in a constant concentration of dobutamine in the coronary artery independent of coronary blood flow. In these subjects, a 5F bipolar pacing catheter was advanced to the right atrial appendage and pacing was initiated 15 beats per minute above the baseline heart rate.28 The sequence of infusions was as follows: (1) Baseline measurements were obtained during the intracoronary infusion of D5W at a rate of 2 mL/min. (2) Dobutamine diluted in D5W was infused via a systemic vein at a rate of 6, 10, or 15 µg · kg-1 · min-1 for 10 minutes, titrated to achieve a 30% to 50% rise in peak +dP/dt, and until peak +dP/dt achieved a stable plateau (±5%) for at least 2 minutes. (3) During the continued systemic infusion of dobutamine, L-NMMA was infused via the left main coronary artery catheter at a rate of 20 µmol/min for 5 minutes in three patients and for 15 minutes in three patients.
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as
mean±SEM. Changes from
baseline and over the different infusion combinations were compared by
use of paired two-way ANOVA. Post hoc testing was performed using
the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effect of L-NMMA on the Positive Inotropic Response to
Intracoronary Dobutamine
Intracoronary infusion of dobutamine
increased LV peak +dP/dt by 33±3% from 950±90 mm Hg/s to
1252±107
mm Hg/s (P<.0001 versus baseline) (Fig 1A
).
Intracoronary infusion of L-NMMA alone had no effect on LV
peak +dP/dt (Table 2
). A second infusion of
dobutamine, during coinfusion of L-NMMA, increased LV peak
+dP/dt by 44±6% to 1327±117 mm Hg/s (P<.0002
versus
baseline). Coinfusion of L-NMMA potentiated the response to
dobutamine in seven of eight subjects and by an average of
30±10% (Fig 2A
; P<.04 versus
dobutamine alone).
|
|
|
Effect of L-NMMA on Heart Rate and LV Pressures
Intracoronary
dobutamine decreased
LVEDP by 8±3 mm Hg and increased LV developed pressure by 12±6
mm Hg but had no significant effect on heart rate or LV systolic
pressure (Fig 3
). Intracoronary infusion of
L-NMMA alone had no effect on heart rate, mean arterial
pressure, LV systolic pressure, or LVEDP (Table 2
). With
coinfusion of
L-NMMA and dobutamine, the decrease in LVEDP (-6±2
mm Hg) was not different from dobutamine alone. However,
coinfusion of L-NMMA potentiated dobutamine-stimulated
increases in LV systolic pressure (18±2 mm Hg) and LV developed
pressure (23±2 mm Hg) (Fig 3
).
|
Peripheral Dobutamine
Infusion
Because L-NMMA infusion could reduce coronary blood
flow, intracoronary dobutamine concentrations
could be higher during L-NMMA coinfusion. To address this issue, in six
additional patients dobutamine (6, 10, or 15
µg · kg-1 · min-1,
titrated
to achieve a 30% to 50% rise in peak +dP/dt) was administered via a
peripheral vein before and concurrent with
intracoronary L-NMMA. Intravenous
dobutamine increased LV peak +dP/dt by 44±6% from 864±83
mm Hg/s to 1244±126 mm Hg/s (Fig 1B
). The addition of
intracoronary L-NMMA during continued
intravenous dobutamine further increased LV
peak +dP/dt to 1349±156 mm Hg/s (P=.07 versus
dobutamine alone). Thus, L-NMMA had a qualitatively and
quantitatively similar effect to that observed with the
intracoronary dobutamine infusion and
potentiated the increase in LV peak +dP/dt by 37±18%
(P=.07, Fig 2B
). Similarly, with the addition
of L-NMMA to
intravenous dobutamine, there was a trend
toward an increase in LV systolic and developed pressure with no change
in LVEDP (data not shown). Heart rate was held constant by right atrial
pacing.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our hypothesis was based on several in vitro and in vivo observations. Gulick et al29 observed that exposure of cultured cardiac myocytes to immune cytokines attenuated the contractile response to ß-adrenergic agonists. Other investigators subsequently implicated NO in this phenomenon by showing that inhibitors of NO reversed the ß-adrenergic attenuating effect of cytokines30 or endotoxin-stimulated macrophages.11 Immune cytokines induce the expression of iNOS (type II NOS) in several cell types that are or may be present in the myocardium, including endothelial cells,31 macrophages,32 vascular smooth muscle cells,33 and cardiac myocytes.11 20 21
There is also evidence that cardiac NO production adequate to inhibit ß-adrenergic responses may occur in normal myocardium that has not been stimulated by immune cytokines, presumably because of basal production of NO by cNOS (type III NOS).10 In isolated rat cardiac myocytes, Balligand et al9 found that inhibition of NOS potentiated the contractile response to ß-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol. Likewise, we recently found in normal dogs with autonomic blockade that the positive inotropic response to intracoronary infusion of isoproterenol is potentiated by the concurrent infusion of the NOS inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester.14 However, the role of cNOS in normal hearts is not clear, and other studies34 35 have not found evidence that endogenous NO inhibits the contractile response to ß-adrenergic stimulation.
A potential physiological role for NO may be to mediate muscarinic cholinergic inhibition of ß-adrenergic contractility. This inhibition, which has been described in both animals36 37 and humans,38 has recently been shown to be due in part to muscarinic activation of myocardial NO activity.10 15 There are several possible cellular sources of constitutive NO production in the myocardium, including myocytes,9 10 neurons (neuronal NOS or type I NOS),39 and microvascular endothelial cells.30 40
Our findings are consistent with direct evidence that human myocardium has NOS activity. Messenger RNA for iNOS was detected in myocardium from human cardiac allografts,18 and mRNAs for both cNOS and iNOS were detected in failing human myocardium obtained from explanted hearts at the time of cardiac transplantation.19 DeBelder et al16 have reported that there is NOS activity, as assessed by the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline, in ventricular myocardium obtained from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial tissue obtained from patients without overt heart failure at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery. Based on the calcium dependence of the NOS activity, it was concluded that the predominant activity in failing myocardium was iNOS, whereas the predominant activity in the subjects undergoing bypass surgery was cNOS.16
We studied patients with LV dysfunction for several reasons. First, in this group of patients, the positive inotropic response to ß-adrenergic stimulation is frequently attenuated. Second, there is evidence that NO production is increased in patients with heart failure, as evidenced by elevated circulating levels of plasma nitrate, an NO metabolite.41 42 Third, mRNAs for cNOS and iNOS have been demonstrated in failing human myocardium.18 19 Fourth, heart failure is associated with elevated circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines that could cause iNOS induction.20 21 It is possible that the effect of NOS inhibition observed in the present study is related to the presence of LV dysfunction in our subjects. However, there was no apparent relation between the extent of potentiation with L-NMMA and any of several measures of LV dysfunction (ejection fraction, right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, and cardiac index). Further study will be required to assess the extent to which our observations depend on the presence of LV dysfunction.
In the present study, L-NMMA had no effect on measures of LV function in the absence of exogenous ß-adrenergic stimulation with dobutamine. This finding suggests that the levels of endogenous NO present in the myocardium did not affect basal LV contractile state directly, but acted in some way to attenuate the responsiveness of the ß-adrenergic receptor pathway. The delivery of exogenous NO to isolated hearts43 or to humans via the intracoronary infusion of nitroprusside44 shortened the duration of systole and accelerated the onset of diastole but, in agreement with our data, did not affect indexes of LV contraction or relaxation.
Because sympathetic tone is frequently elevated in patients with congestive heart failure, it is somewhat surprising that L-NMMA did not potentiate basal +dP/dt in our study. This may reflect the fact that the patients in our study were relatively well compensated and therefore may not have had intense sympathetic activation. In future studies, it will be interesting to compare the effect of L-NMMA to indexes of myocardial sympathetic activation. It is also possible that sympathetic activity plays a relatively minor role in supporting basal systolic function, or that the contribution of endogenous sympathetic tone, vis-à-vis the pharmacological effects of a potent exogenous ß-adrenergic agonist, may be relatively minor.
Three technical issues require consideration. First, changes in heart rate and LV pressures, most notably LVEDP, can influence the measurement of LV peak dP/dt,45 which was the major index of inotropic response in the present study. Heart rate was unchanged throughout the protocol, and the decrease in LVEDP caused by dobutamine infusion was not affected by L-NMMA. The conclusion that L-NMMA potentiated the positive inotropic response to dobutamine is further supported by the observation that the dobutamine-stimulated increases in LV systolic and developed pressures were greater with concurrent L-NMMA infusion, consistent with a greater positive inotropic response. Second, it is possible that L-NMMA may have decreased coronary blood flow, thereby causing an increase in the steady state concentration of dobutamine in the coronary artery with the intracoronary infusion protocol. This seems unlikely, because we previously found that the intracoronary dobutamine infusion rates used in the present study cause a near-maximal increase in LV peak +dP/dt in patients with a similar degree of heart failure.1 To further exclude this possibility, we infused dobutamine peripherally in six subjects. In these subjects, L-NMMA potentiated the positive inotropic response to dobutamine by an average of 37±18%. Thus, although we cannot completely exclude the possibility that an increase in the coronary artery concentration of dobutamine contributed to the effect seen with the intracoronary infusion protocol, it appears that this effect of L-NMMA does not require a change in coronary blood flow. Finally, our study design, which relied on comparing two successive infusions of intracoronary dobutamine without and with concurrent L-NMMA, was based on our previous observation that repeated administrations of intracoronary dobutamine produce near identical rises in dP/dt.1 Thus, the augmentation in dP/dt with L-NMMA cannot be attributed to an effect related to successive applications of a ß-agonist.
The present study demonstrates that in humans with LV dysfunction, NO produced within the heart attenuates the positive inotropic response to ß-adrenergic stimulation. It remains to be determined whether cardiac NO production is increased in pathological states such as LV dysfunction. Nevertheless, these data suggest that NO contributes to the ß-adrenergic hyporesponsiveness that is frequently found in such patients and provide the first evidence that NO can modulate myocardial function in humans. Inhibition of NO production may improve myocardial ß-adrenergic responsiveness in patients with LV dysfunction and other states associated with increased NO production, such as systemic sepsis and myocardial inflammation.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 1, 1995; revision received May 10, 1995; accepted May 16, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1293-H1303. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Kass, E. Takimoto, T. Nagayama, and H. C. Champion Phosphodiesterase regulation of nitric oxide signaling Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2007; 75(2): 303 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kumar, B. Paladugu, J. Mensing, A. Kumar, and J. E. Parrillo Nitric oxide-dependent and -independent mechanisms are involved in TNF-{alpha}-induced depression of cardiac myocyte contractility Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R1900 - R1906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Takimoto, D. Belardi, C. G. Tocchetti, S. Vahebi, G. Cormaci, E. A. Ketner, A. L. Moens, H. C. Champion, and D. A. Kass Compartmentalization of Cardiac {beta}-Adrenergic Inotropy Modulation by Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Circulation, April 24, 2007; 115(16): 2159 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Godecke On the impact of NO-globin interactions in the cardiovascular system Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2006; 69(2): 309 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mak, C. B. Overgaard, and G. E. Newton Effect of vitamin C and L-NMMA on the inotropic response to dobutamine in patients with heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2424 - H2428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Semigran Type 5 Phosphodiesterase Inhibition: The Focus Shifts to the Heart Circulation, October 25, 2005; 112(17): 2589 - 2591. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Borlaug, V. Melenovsky, T. Marhin, P. Fitzgerald, and D. A. Kass Sildenafil Inhibits {beta}-Adrenergic-Stimulated Cardiac Contractility in Humans Circulation, October 25, 2005; 112(17): 2642 - 2649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Q. He, R. C. Balijepalli, R. A. Haworth, and T. J. Kamp Crosstalk of {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes Through Gi Blunts {beta}-Adrenergic Stimulation of L-Type Ca2+ Channels in Canine Heart Failure Circ. Res., September 16, 2005; 97(6): 566 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Di Napoli, A. A. Taccardi, A. Grilli, M. A. De Lutiis, A. Barsotti, M. Felaco, and R. De Caterina Chronic treatment with rosuvastatin modulates nitric oxide synthase expression and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat hearts Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2005; 66(3): 462 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohta, N. Hasebe, S. Tsuji, K. Izawa, Y.-T. Jin, S. Kido, S. Natori, M. Sato, and K. Kikuchi Unequal effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in acute cardiac dysfunction induced by isoproterenol Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2914 - H2921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Ostrom, R. A. Bundey, and P. A. Insel Nitric Oxide Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase Type 6 Activity Is Dependent upon Lipid Rafts and Caveolin Signaling Complexes J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19846 - 19853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Champion, D. Georgakopoulos, E. Takimoto, T. Isoda, Y. Wang, and D. A. Kass Modulation of In Vivo Cardiac Function by Myocyte-Specific Nitric Oxide Synthase-3 Circ. Res., March 19, 2004; 94(5): 657 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mak and G. E. Newton Redox modulation of the inotropic response to dobutamine is impaired in patients with heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): H789 - H795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.B. Massion, O. Feron, C. Dessy, and J.-L. Balligand Nitric Oxide and Cardiac Function: Ten Years After, and Continuing Circ. Res., September 5, 2003; 93(5): 388 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffelmann and R. A. Kloner Effects of sildenafil on myocardial infarct size, microvascular function, and acute ischemic left ventricular dilation Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2003; 59(2): 441 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kumar, K. Nguyen, S. Waxman, B. D. Nearing, G. A. Wellenius, S. X. Zhao, and R. L. Verrier Potent antifibrillatory effects of intrapericardial nitroglycerin in the ischemic porcine heart J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 21, 2003; 41(10): 1831 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Natori, N. Hasebe, Y.-T. Jin, T. Matsusaka, A. Ido, H. Matsuhashi, T. Ihara, and K. Kikuchi Inhaled Nitric Oxide Modifies Left Ventricular Diastolic Stress in the Presence of Vasoactive Agents in Heart Failure Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2003; 167(6): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Brutsaert Cardiac Endothelial-Myocardial Signaling: Its Role in Cardiac Growth, Contractile Performance, and Rhythmicity Physiol Rev, January 1, 2003; 83(1): 59 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kaye, M. M. Parnell, and B. A. Ahlers Reduced Myocardial and Systemic L-Arginine Uptake in Heart Failure Circ. Res., December 13, 2002; 91(12): 1198 - 1203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Funakoshi, T. Kubota, N. Kawamura, Y. Machida, A. M. Feldman, H. Tsutsui, H. Shimokawa, and A. Takeshita Disruption of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Improves {beta}-Adrenergic Inotropic Responsiveness but Not the Survival of Mice With Cytokine-Induced Cardiomyopathy Circ. Res., May 17, 2002; 90(9): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Napoli, V. Guardasole, M. Matarazzo, E. A. Palmieri, U. Oliviero, S. Fazio, and L. Sacca Growth hormone corrects vascular dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Hintze Prologue: Nitric oxide-hormones, metabolism, and function Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2253 - H2255. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||