(Circulation. 1996;93:1993-1999.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Division of Cardiology (H.I., A.O., K.I., S.T., S.N., Y.N., Y.T., Y.H., K.F., T. Minamino), Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, and The First Department of Medicine (T. Masuyama, M.H.), Osaka University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence to Hiroshi Ito, MD, Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We carefully reviewed the cineangiograms of 86 patients who achieved coronary revascularization within 12 hours of the onset and underwent MCE before and soon after recanalization with the intracoronary injection of sonicated microbubbles. Antegrade coronary flow after recanalization was graded by two observers based on Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial flow grades. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured on the day of infarction and 1 month later. TIMI grade 2 was observed in 18 patients (21%), and the other 68 patients manifested TIMI grade 3 after recanalization. All patients with TIMI 2 showed substantial MCE no reflow, whereas only 11 patients (16%) with TIMI 3 showed MCE no reflow. Functional improvement was worse in patients with TIMI 2 than in those with TIMI 3 (TIMI 2, 38±8% versus 40±8%, P=NS [acute versus late]; TIMI 3, 44±13% versus 55±13%, P<.001). Among patients with TIMI 3, significant functional improvement was observed only in patients with MCE reflow (MCE reflow, 46±13% versus 57±12%, P<.001; MCE no reflow, 35±11% versus 45±12%, P=NS).
Conclusions Despite no obstructive lesion of the vessel, TIMI 2 is caused by advanced microvascular damage and is a highly specific, although not sensitive, predictor of poor functional outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. TIMI 3 does not necessarily indicate myocardial salvage, and detection of MCE no reflow in these patients is particularly useful for the prediction of functional outcome.
Key Words: angioplasty myocardial infarction echocardiography microcirculation reperfusion
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Severe ischemia causes microvascular damage in the areas of myocardial necrosis (no-reflow phenomenon).4 5 6 7 8 9 In recent clinical studies, myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was used to show that ischemic episodes often break down the coronary microvasculature and that the patent epicardial coronary vessel per se does not necessarily guarantee perfusion at the microvascular level in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thus, although there might be a discrepancy between angiographic findings of epicardial coronary artery flow and MCE findings of myocardial perfusion at the microvascular level, there are no systematic data regarding their relation.
To establish the relation, we reviewed the coronary cineangiograms of the patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction who underwent MCE before and after successful coronary angioplasty. The antegrade radiocontrast flow after the intervention was graded with the grading system of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial study group as it is most widely used. We assessed the incidence of TIMI grade 2 in patients without an apparent vessel obstruction, and its outcome was studied from the left ventricular functional viewpoint. In addition, we studied the relation between TIMI flow grading and microvascular dysfunction assessed with MCE.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30
minutes' duration occurring within 6 hours of
presentation, ST-segment elevation of
2 mm in two
contiguous ECG leads, and more than threefold increase in serum
creatine kinase levels. Twelve patients were excluded from the
analysis due to inadequate cineangiogram for
evaluation of TIMI flow grade (five patients), incomplete
coronary recanalization (residual diameter
stenosis of
50%, flow-restricting dissection, or distal
embolization) (four patients), and inadequate
echocardiographic image quality (three patients).
Therefore, this report is based on the remaining 86 patients (67 men
and 19 women; mean age, 58 years; age range, 38 to 75 years).
Seventy-one patients subsequently developed Q waves on 12-lead
surface ECG, and the other 15 patients manifested nonQ wave
myocardial infarction. Informed consent was obtained from each patient
by one of the investigators. The study protocol was approved by the
hospital's Ethics Committee.
Protocol
Catheterization was performed by using the
femoral approach in the acute stage. Each patient rested in the supine
position. All patients were pretreated with an injection of 100 U/kg
heparin in the catheter laboratory. On completion of the
diagnostic coronary angiography and left
ventriculography, 2 mL of sonicated Ioxaglate (Hexabrix-360, Tanabe)
containing sonicated microbubbles (a mean size of 12 µm) was injected
into the left coronary artery for MCE. A commercially available
mechanical sector scanner was used (model SAL-38B, Toshiba; carrier
frequency of 3.5 MHz). Imaging of the apical long-axis view was
initiated
10 seconds before the contrast injection and was continued
for an average of 30 seconds with constant gain setting. MCE images
were recorded on 1.25-cm videotape with a VHS recorder (model
BR-6000, Victor). MCE was repeated with the contrast injection into the
right coronary artery. Lead II ECG was continuously monitored
during and after MCE. Intracoronary
nitroglycerin (300 µg) and intravenous
aspirin were given before coronary angioplasty. If required,
intravenous heparin was added to prolong the
activated clotting time (ACT) to >300 seconds. Angioplasty was
performed with the use of an exchangeable guide wire system. An attempt
was made to reduce the degree of residual stenosis at all
regions within the infarct-related artery vessel <50% with
restoration of flow. At a mean of 16 minutes after coronary
recanalization, coronary angiography was
repeated with a 6F diagnostic catheter, and the right
anterior oblique projection was recorded for the evaluation of
TIMI flow grade. MCE was repeated immediately after that with the use
of the same procedure previously mentioned.
Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed before coronary intervention and at a mean of 24 days after the infarction with a commercially available electrical sector scanner (model SSH-65A, SSH-260A, Toshiba; carrier frequency of 3.75 or 2.5 MHz). In each echocardiographic examination, the parasternal long-axis view, the short-axis views at the levels of the mitral valve and midpapillary muscle, and the apical long-axis view were monitored and recorded on 1.25-cm videotape.
Coronary angiography and left ventriculography were repeated at a mean of 25 days after the infarction (24 to 29 days) with the right brachial approach. All medications were withdrawn at least 12 hours before cardiac catheterization.
Analysis of Echocardiographic
Data
MCE images were analyzed by an experienced
echocardiographer with the use of a commercially available
image-analyzing system (Color Cardiology
Workstation, TomTec or LA-500, PIAS). End-diastolic
images of the apical long-axis view were digitized gating to the
upstroke of the R wave, starting with two cycles before the onset of
contrast enhancement visible in the myocardium. The image
showing the brightest intensity was used for the following
analysis. The areas at risk and of no reflow phenomenon were
defined as contrast perfusion defects before and after coronary
recanalization, respectively. The area of no reflow
phenomenon was expressed as a ratio to the risk area. When the ratio
exceeded 25%, myocardial reperfusion in the corresponding segment was
considered to be incomplete (MCE no reflow). If this ratio was
25%,
we considered myocardial reperfusion to be adequate (MCE reflow). In
patients with MCE no reflow, the area of no reflow phenomenon was also
expressed as the ratio to the risk area and to that of the left
ventricular myocardium. Contrast defects are
always clearly defined, and measurements of the size of the residual
contrast defect are highly reproducible, as previously
mentioned.10 11
Measurement of wall motion score (WMS) has been described previously.10 In brief, the left ventricle was divided into 17 segments (8 segments on each short-axis slice at the levels of the mitral valve and midpapillary muscle and the apical segment on the apical long-axis view), and each segment was scored with the following system: 3 indicates dyskinetic/akinetic; 2, severely hypokinetic; 1, hypokinetic; and 0, normal. Hyperkinesis is not given a score. The sum of each segmental score was defined as WMS. In the evaluation of the segmental wall motion abnormalities, we carefully examined the systolic thickening in the central portion of each segment. Segmental score was determined by two independent observers who were unaware of clinical data. In cases of disagreement, consensus was established by a third observer.
Analysis of Catheterization
Data
After mechanical causes of flow reduction were excluded, such as
critical residual coronary stenosis, apparent
dissection, thrombosis, and/or distal vessel cutoff suggestive of
macroembolization, the antegrade radiocontrast flow of the
infarct-related artery was determined on the final coronary
angiogram by two radiologists with the use of TIMI criteria (without
knowledge of patients' data). The TIMI flow grades have been defined
previously.12 In brief, grade 0 perfusion is no antegrade
flow beyond the point of occlusion; grade 1 is minimal incomplete
perfusion of contrast medium around the clot; grade 2 (partial
perfusion) is complete but delayed perfusion of the distal
coronary bed with contrast material; and grade 3 (complete
perfusion) is antegrade flow to the entire distal bed at a normal rate.
In six cases of disagreement, final TIMI grade was determined by
consensus of two radiologists. The exclusion of these six patients did
not affect the conclusion of this study. Percent coronary
diameter stenosis of the infarct-related artery was also
quantified without knowledge of patients' data through the use of a
validated technique.
Collateral channels were graded in the initial coronary angiograms as follows: 0, no collaterals; 1, incomplete slow opacification in the distal vessel; 2, slow but complete opacification of the distal vessel; and 3, opacification of the distal vessel as well as the donor vessel. The right anterior oblique projections of baseline and late-stage left ventriculograms were analyzed by an angiographer who was blinded to patients' data. Global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined by the area-length method, and regional wall motion (RWM) of the infarct zone (SD per chord) was determined by the centerline method.13
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SD. Multiple comparisons were
made with a one-way ANOVA, and individual data were compared with
the use of Schéffe's F test for factor analysis.
Statistical analysis of temporal changes in certain
variables was computed with the use of ANOVA and Schéffe's F
test for repeated measures. Differences were considered significant at
P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Left ventricular functional outcomes (WMS, LVEF, and RWM)
were compared between those with TIMI grades 2 and 3 reflow (Fig 1
). There were no differences in baseline left
ventricular performance between the two subsets
other than WMS being slightly greater in TIMI grade 2 reflow. Patients
with TIMI grade 3 reflow showed substantial improvement in left
ventricular performance in the convalescent stage
(WMS, 16±5 versus 10±7 [acute versus late]; LVEF, 44±13% versus
55±13%; RWM, -3.12±0.62 versus -2.24±0.93 SD/chord). In
contrast, little or no temporal improvement was observed in those with
TIMI grade 2 reflow (WMS, 19±3 versus 18±3; LVEF, 38±8% versus
40±8%; RWM, -3.35±0.40 versus -3.20±0.39
SD/chord). Thus, the late-stage left ventricular
function was significantly better in patients with TIMI grade 3 reflow
than in those with TIMI grade 2 reflow.
|
Microvascular Dysfunction and TIMI Flow Grade
MCE after coronary
recanalization demonstrated significant contrast
opacification within the risk area (MCE reflow) in 57 patients and
substantial size of no reflow (MCE no reflow) in 29 patients. MCE
showed reflow in 57 of 68 patients with TIMI grade 3 reflow (Fig 2
), whereas MCE showed no reflow in the other 11
patients with TIMI grade 3 reflow and in all of the 18 patients with
TIMI grade 2 reflow (Fig 3
). Interestingly, MCE
demonstrated no reflow regardless of apparently good radiocontrast
run-off in the coronary angiogram in 11 patients (16%)
(Fig 4
). Therefore, coronary angiographic TIMI
grade 2 reflow is specific (100%) but not sensitive (62%) in
predicting MCE no reflow.
|
|
|
Our patients were divided into three groups based on TIMI flow
grades and the presence or absence of MCE reflow, TIMI grade 2 reflow
(TIMI 2, 18 patients), TIMI grade 3 reflow but without MCE reflow (TIMI
3/MCE no reflow, 11 patients), and TIMI grade 3 reflow and MCE reflow
(TIMI 3/MCE reflow, 57 patients). There were no significant differences
in clinical characteristics among the three subsets, although
angiographic collateral grade was greater in patients with TIMI 3/MCE
reflow (Table 1
). Baseline left ventricular
performance was better, improvement in left
ventricular performance was larger, and, therefore,
the late-stage left ventricular performance was
far better in patients with TIMI 3/MCE reflow than in patients with
TIMI 2 or TIMI 3/MCE no reflow (Table 2
). Thus, patients
of TIMI 3/MCE no reflow were more like those with TIMI grade 2 reflow
than those with TIMI 3/MCE reflow in terms of left
ventricular performance.
|
Then, we compared the microvascular damage in the latter two groups. There was no significant difference in the size of MCE no reflow as assessed with the ratios to the risk area and to the left ventricular myocardium between patients with TIMI 3/MCE no reflow and patients with TIMI grade 2 (0.55±0.16 versus 0.62±0.19, P=NS; 0.31±0.11 versus 0.30±0.12, P=NS).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TIMI Grade 2 in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Slow filling of the epicardial coronary artery (TIMI grade
2 reflow) is uncommon after elective catheter intervention. Piana et
al1 described the occurrence in only 2.0% of nearly 2000
consecutive percutaneous coronary
interventions. The incidence is much higher, however, in patients
undergoing intervention for acute myocardial infarction (11.5%) or
treatment of the saphenous vein graft (4.0%). A similar phenomenon was
described in another setting: catheter intervention of older saphenous
vein grafts or native arteries in patients with unstable
angina.2 14 In this study, antegrade coronary flow
was determined to be TIMI grade 2 reflow in 18 of 86 patients (21%)
with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and without concomitant
proximal epicardial obstruction (by clot, dissection, or spasm) or
distal vessel cutoff after coronary angioplasty. This result
implies that substantial reduction in postprocedural coronary
flow is often found in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
However, there has been little convincing evidence to support the contention that TIMI grade 2 flow is caused by the severe microvascular dysfunction. Our MCE data showed a broad no reflow area in all patients with TIMI grade 2 reflow, whereas MCE reflow was obtained in the majority (84%) of patients with TIMI grade 3 reflow. Thus, broad and advanced microvascular perfusion abnormality is a main cause for postprocedural reduction in the epicardial coronary flow in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
The reduction in postprocedural coronary flow has been explained mainly by increased microvascular impedance to flow, which is caused by neutrophil plugging of capillaries, myocyte contracture and edema, distal microvascular spasm, and endothelial blistering.4 5 6 15 16 17 The magnitude of blood flow in a recanalized artery may also depend on several other complex, interrelated factors. Relevant variables of fluid dynamics include stenosis severity, which is negligible in the present study, and blood viscosity. Biological variables include myocardial mass supplied by the culprit artery, vasodilator reserve and duration of ischemia, the extent of reperfusion injury, cardiac preload and afterload, and timing of recanalization. Imperfect correlations between angiographic recanalization and tissue perfusion may be related to some of these factors as well as to technical problems of the TIMI grading system.
Implications of TIMI Grade 2
The TIMI study group initially designated patency grade 0 or 1 as
thrombolysis failure and grade 2 or 3 as success, and
TIMI grade 2 has been traditionally combined with TIMI grade 3 patency
in the calculation of the total patency rate in the previous
thrombolytic study.13 In contrast, the
GUSTO angiographic investigators demonstrated that
ventricular function was worse and mortality was higher
among patients with TIMI grade 2 than among patients with complete
reperfusion (TIMI grade 3).18 Recent GUSTO-1 trials
documented that only TIMI grade 3 (but not grade 2) was associated with
mortality reductions after acute myocardial infarction and indicated
that TIMI grade 2 may not be regarded as success of reperfusion
therapy.19 In addition, the PAMI study group reported that
immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty, which is associated with a higher patency rate than
intravenous tissue-type plasminogen
activator, reduces the combined occurrence of nonfatal
reinfarction or death compared with tissue-type
plasminogen activator therapy for acute
myocardial infarction.20 Recently, Morishima et
al21 demonstrated that angiographic no reflow after
coronary intervention is a predictor of poor functional outcome
in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Our data also documented
that the early TIMI grade 3 reflow resulted in significantly better
left ventricular functional outcome compared with TIMI
grade 2 reflow. Thus, TIMI grade 2 caused by the most extensive
microvascular dysfunction is associated with the advanced myocardial
injury and therefore should be a marker of less favorable functional
outcome. If only TIMI grade 2 reflow is achieved after all the effort
to remove vessel obstruction, optimal myocardial salvage should be
unlikely in the chronic stage.
There are at least three possible reasons for the failure of TIMI grade 2 reflow to lead to optimal myocardial salvage. First, microvascular dysfunction is a main cause of TIMI grade 2 reflow as previously mentioned. Ischemic episodes often break down the coronary microvasculature as well as myocardial cell. The no reflow phenomenon is always found in the center of myocardial necrosis and should be a sign of poor functional outcome.4 5 Second, TIMI grade 2 reflow may be inadequate to meet the metabolic demand of the jeopardized myocardium, falling below the critical threshold required to relieve ischemia of the myocardium. The third possible reason is the rethrombosis or the collapse of the postintervention lesion due to flow stagnation. In the other study, however, we found no difference in frequencies of coronary reocclusion between patients with and those without MCE reflow (3% versus 6%, respectively, P=NS).22
TIMI flow grade is influenced not only by microvascular dysfunction but also by epicardial coronary stenosis; therefore, coronary flow may decrease in patients with relatively preserved microvasculature if residual stenosis is critical. In such cases, left ventricular function may improve in the convalescent stage. Thus, if residual coronary stenosis is present after thrombolysis, TIMI grade 2 reflow does not necessarily indicate microvascular dysfunction. Additional MCE may be particularly helpful in such patients.
TIMI Grade 3
The degree of left ventricular functional improvement
varied even among the patients representing good
radiocontrast run-off (TIMI grade 3 reflow). Although the majority
of patients with TIMI grade 3 reflow showed good MCE reflow, a
substantial size of MCE no reflow was observed in 16% of this group.
Temporal left ventricular functional improvement was worse
in these patients than in those with MCE reflow in TIMI grade 3.
Although TIMI grade 3 reflow generally indicates better myocardial
perfusion and conveys better outcomes than TIMI grade 2 reflow, it does
not always guarantee the successful myocardial reperfusion and
functional improvement in individual patients. Additional MCE is
particularly valuable in patients with TIMI grade 3 reflow because of
its ability to detect microvascular damage, which is observed in some
of this group.
Despite the presence of the no reflow phenomenon, some patients showed good radiocontrast run-off (TIMI grade 3) and the other patients showed slow radiocontrast opacification (TIMI grade 2). We initially speculated that the ischemic microvascular damage would be more severe in patients with TIMI grade 2 reflow than in those with TIMI grade 3 reflow, even among the patients with MCE no reflow. Although not statistically significant, late-stage left ventricular performance was slightly worse in patients with TIMI 2 than in those with TIMI 3/MCE no reflow. Therefore, patients with TIMI 3/MCE no reflow may be regarded as the intermediary group.
The size of the no reflow phenomenon, however, did not differ between these two subsets. Several possible reasons are postulated, including size (length) of the coronary artery; hemodynamic variables including heart rate, blood pressure, and left ventricular filling pressure; and the timing of evaluation. Hyperemic response and microvascular dysfunction exist within the risk area immediately after reflow, and their balance may vary with time for several hours after reperfusion.23 Other factors, such as reproducibility of TIMI grading and variables that may influence coronary flow dynamics, should also be taken into consideration in the evaluation of angiographic findings.
Critique of Methods
There were several limitations in this retrospective study.
Although possibilities of mechanical obstruction were excluded on the
basis of catheterization and clinical reports and were
confirmed by the review of the cineangiograms, there was a
potential for bias. TIMI flow grades were assessed retrospectively,
although two radiologists reviewed the films to reduce potential bias
in these measurements. TIMI flow grade is only a surrogate for direct
measurement of coronary blood flow, and the influence of oxygen
consumption, hemodynamic variables (heart rate and
blood pressure), size of coronary artery, and local
autoregulation cannot be excluded.
MCE results should also be considered in light of several limitations to the analysis. First, our method is largely dependent on echocardiographic image quality. Second, contrast intensity is influenced by many factors, including the size and number of microbubbles and factors altering ultrasonic reflection such as gain setting, depth of penetration, incident angle, axial and lateral resolution, gray-scale compression, and the nonlinearity of echo amplitude signals. Finally, the size of the no reflow phenomenon may alter with time after reperfusion.24 In a study in dogs, Villanueva et al23 reported that the size of residual contrast defects usually reaches its maximal value at 15 minutes after coronary reflow, which is similar to our timing of examination.
Clinical Implications
Although the success or outcome of coronary intervention
should be ideally assessed with a parameter of myocardial
perfusion, the major end point of many angiographic trials has been the
acquisition of a patent infarct-related artery. Our results clearly
showed the values and limitations of coronary angiography in
the evaluation of myocardial salvage. Because the patency status of the
infarct-related artery does not indicate the extent of
microvascular integrity, assessment of microvascular perfusion may be
essential in gaining further understanding of patient outcomes and the
relation between interventions and outcomes. In this context, TIMI
grade 2 reflow, despite no epicardial flowrestricting lesion, is
a specific, although not sensitive, indicator of incomplete myocardial
perfusion, and "recanalization" does not
always mean "reperfusion." Thus, we can easily differentiate the
patients with poor left ventricular functional outcomes in
the catheter laboratory just after coronary
recanalization.
Our data also showed that MCE, which is used to visualize tissue perfusion at the microvascular level, is more sensitive to detect microvascular damage or dysfunction in the infarct region than is conventional coronary angiography. Additional MCE provides a better understanding of myocardial perfusion in those who manifested good radiocontrast dynamics. The precise information on the postischemic microvascular conditions (and, thus, myocardial viability) should aid in assessing size of infarction and thereby in making decisions regarding therapeutic strategy in the early stage of infarction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 1, 1995; revision received November 27, 1995; accepted December 6, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Jaffe, T. Charron, G. Puley, A. Dick, and B. H. Strauss Microvascular Obstruction and the No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circulation, June 17, 2008; 117(24): 3152 - 3156. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Rochitte Microvascular obstruction the final frontier for a complete myocardial reperfusion. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 10, 2008; 51(23): 2239 - 2240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Goodman, V. Menon, C. P. Cannon, G. Steg, E. M. Ohman, and R. A. Harrington Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 708S - 775S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time? Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 299 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Marques, P. Knaapen, R. Boellaard, N. Westerhof, A. A. Lammertsma, C. A. Visser, and F. C. Visser Hyperaemic microvascular resistance is not increased in viable myocardium after chronic myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2320 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Niccoli, G. A. Lanza, S. Shaw, E. Romagnoli, D. Gioia, F. Burzotta, C. Trani, M. A. Mazzari, R. Mongiardo, M. De Vita, et al. Endothelin-1 and acute myocardial infarction: a no-reflow mediator after successful percutaneous myocardial revascularization Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1793 - 1798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y-J Yang, J-L Zhao, S-J You, Y-J Wu, Z-C Jing, W-X Yang, L Meng, Y-W Wang, and R-L Gao Different effects of tirofiban and aspirin plus clopidogrel on myocardial no-reflow in a mini-swine model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1131 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferenc and F.-J. Neumann Efficacy of primary PCI: the microvessel perspective Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I4 - I9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gick, N. Jander, H.-P. Bestehorn, R.-P. Kienzle, M. Ferenc, K. Werner, T. Comberg, K. Peitz, D. Zohlnhofer, V. Bassignana, et al. Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Filter-Based Distal Protection on Myocardial Perfusion and Infarct Size After Primary Percutaneous Catheter Intervention in Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation Circulation, September 6, 2005; 112(10): 1462 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sorajja, B. J. Gersh, C. Costantini, M. G. McLaughlin, P. Zimetbaum, D. A. Cox, E. Garcia, J. E. Tcheng, R. Mehran, A. J. Lansky, et al. Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 667 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Ohara, Y Hiasa, T Takahashi, K Yamaguchi, R Ogura, T Ogata, K Yuba, K Kusunoki, S Hosokawa, K Kishi, et al. Relation between the TIMI frame count and the degree of microvascular injury after primary coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Furber, F. Prunier, H. C. P. Nguyen, S. Boulet, S. Delepine, and P. Geslin Coronary Blood Flow Assessment After Successful Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts the Risk of Long-Term Cardiac Events Circulation, December 7, 2004; 110(23): 3527 - 3533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Iwakura, H. Ito, S. Kawano, A. Okamura, K. Tanaka, Y. Nishida, Y. Maekawa, and K. Fujii Assessing myocardial perfusion with the transthoracic Doppler technique in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction: comparison with angiographic, enzymatic and electrocardiographic indices Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1526 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Costantini, G. W. Stone, R. Mehran, E. Aymong, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, B. J. Gersh, J. E. Tcheng, et al. Frequency, correlates, and clinical implications of myocardial perfusion after primary angioplasty and stenting, with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 305 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffemann and R. A. Kloner Microvascular Alterations After Temporary Coronary Artery Occlusion: The No-Reflow Phenomenon Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Sezer, Y Nisanci, B Umman, E Yilmaz, A Olcay, F Erzengin, and O Ozsaruhan New support for clarifying the relation between ST segment resolution and microvascular function: degree of ST segment resolution correlates with the pressure derived collateral flow index Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 146 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul and H. Ito Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Ischemia: Part II: Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Circulation, January 27, 2004; 109(3): 310 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kunichika, O. Ben-Yehuda, S. Lafitte, N. Kunichika, B. Peters, and A. N. DeMaria Effects of glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion: A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kloner and W. Dai Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and no-reflow J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 284 - 286. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bonnemeier, U. K.H. Wiegand, F. Bode, F. Hartmann, V. Kurowski, H. A. Katus, and G. Richardt Impact of Infarct-Related Artery Flow on QT Dynamicity in Patients Undergoing Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, December 16, 2003; 108(24): 2979 - 2986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Hozumi, Y Kanzaki, Y Ueda, A Yamamuro, T Takagi, T Akasaka, S Homma, K Yoshida, and J Yoshikawa Coronary flow velocity analysis during short term follow up after coronary reperfusion: use of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to predict regional wall motion recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1163 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, H.-W. Chang, Y.-K. Hsieh, C.-Y. Fang, S.-M. Chen, and M.-C. Chen Impact of Tirofiban on Angiographic Morphologic Features of High-Burden Thrombus Formation During Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Short-term Outcomes Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 962 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |