Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;93:2114-2120

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.

(Circulation. 1996;93:2114-2120.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Six-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcome of the New, Less Shortening Wallstent in Native Coronary Arteries

Yukio Ozaki, MD, PhD; David Keane, MB, MRCPI, PhD; Peter Ruygrok, MD; Willem J. van der Giessen, MD, PhD; Pim de Feyter, MD, PhD; Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD

From the Catheterization Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background The new, less shortening, self-expanding Wallstent is characterized by longitudinal flexibility, a protective membrane, a low profile, and a customized range of diameters (3.5 to 6.0 mm). The recent modification of the braiding angle of the Wallstent has resulted in a new device with less shortening on expansion and a concomitant reduction in radial force. We hypothesized that the enforced mechanical remodeling produced by the selection of an oversized Wallstent might result in improved accommodation of subsequent reactive intimal hyperplasia and prevention of chronic recoil of the vessel.

Methods and Results To prove this hypothesis, we recently implanted 44 new, less shortening Wallstents in 35 native coronary arteries in 35 patients with acute or threatened closure after balloon angioplasty, according to a strategy of oversizing of Wallstent diameter and complete coverage of the lesion length. The initial and 6-month follow-up angiograms were analyzed with a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) system. Acute gain (minimal luminal diameter [MLD] post minus MLD pre) and late loss (MLD post minus MLD at follow-up) were examined. Stent deployment was successful in 44 of 44 attempts (100%). Nominal stent diameter used was 1.40 mm larger than the maximal vessel diameter. One patient (3%) with a dilated but unstented lesion proximal to the stented segment sustained a subacute occlusion on day 1 associated with myocardial infarction. Event-free survival at 30 days after stent implantation was 97% (34 of 35 patients). Of the 34 patients eligible for 6-month angiographic follow-up, 3 who were asymptomatic declined repeat angiography. MLD (and percent diameter stenosis [% DS]) changed from 0.83±0.50 mm (72%) pre through 3.06±0.48 mm (15%) post to 2.27±0.74 mm (28%) at follow-up. Acute gain was 2.23±0.63 mm, and late loss was 0.78±0.61 mm. Angiographic restenosis (>50% DS) was observed in 5 of 31 patients (16%) at 6 months, all of whom underwent repeat angioplasty. Thus, the overall event-free survival at 6-month follow-up was 83% (29 of 35 patients).

Conclusions The oversized Wallstent implantation with complete coverage of the lesion length conveyed a favorable 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome. The large acute gain obtained by the Wallstent afforded greater accommodation of the subsequent late loss. The enforced mechanical remodeling by oversized new Wallstents may result in prevention of acute and chronic recoil of the vessel wall and subsequently a lower restenosis rate at follow-up.


Key Words: arteries • stents • coronary disease • restenosis • angiography • angioplasty


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The new, less shortening, self-expanding Wallstent is characterized by longitudinal flexibility, a protective membrane, a low profile, and a customized range of diameters (3.5 to 6.0 mm) and lengths (12 to 42 mm). The recent modification in braiding angle has resulted in a new device with less shortening on expansion and a concomitant reduction in radial force.1 2 The fine mesh structure of the Wallstent provides maximal scaffolding to the vessel wall, which has previously encouraged extensive implantation of the original Wallstent prototype for the treatment of friable coronary vein grafts and a limited and less favorable implantation experience in native coronary arteries in the late 1980s.3 4 5 6 7 8 However, the safety and efficacy of implantation of the new, less shortening Wallstent in native coronary arteries is unknown. While we have long recognized that the greater the gain, the greater the loss,9 we also recognize that achieving a greater acute luminal gain allows greater subsequent accommodation of loss (in accordance with simple geometry and percent tax laws), and thus, although the absolute loss is greater, the net gain is also greater. Additionally, a recent multicenter stent study using a Palmaz-Schatz stent matched to vessel size demonstrated that the greater initial luminal gain contributed to a significantly lower restenosis rate in the stented group compared with the balloon angioplasty group.10 We hypothesized that implantation of the oversized new Wallstents in native coronary arteries (a policy of resetting the vessel size into undiseased condition) would produce enforced mechanical remodeling of the coronary vessel with subsequent reduction in subacute occlusion and improved accommodation of reactive intimal hyperplasia.

To test this hypothesis, we recently implanted 44 Wallstents into 35 native coronary arteries in 35 patients with acute or threatened closure post coronary balloon angioplasty. Wallstents were selected to produce oversizing of the stent diameter and complete coverage of the lesion length. QCA measurements were made pre primary balloon angioplasty and post Wallstent implantation and the follow-up angiogram by use of a QCA analysis system (CAAS II).


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Patients
To determine the feasibility and safety of deployment of the oversized new, less shortening Wallstent, we deployed 44 Wallstents in 35 native coronary arteries in 35 patients. Patients who had acute or threatened closure post coronary intervention with a dissected lesion length of >18 mm, an MVD of >3.0 mm, absence of significant disease in the major side branches, and absence of clinical contraindication to anticoagulation were included in the study.

Study End Points and Definition
The primary clinical end point of the study was the occurrence of any of the following adverse cardiac events: acute or subacute stent thrombosis, repeat coronary intervention, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, or death. Procedural success was defined as technically successful deployment of the stent in the absence of an adverse cardiac event. Angiographic success was defined as a <30% residual diameter stenosis after final deployment of the stent. Stent thrombosis was defined as a clinical event leading to catheterization that identified stent thrombosis within 14 days of deployment. Long-term clinical outcome included all cardiovascular events occurring within 6 months of stent deployment. Angiographic restenosis was defined as luminal narrowing >=50% diameter stenosis at follow-up.

Criteria of Acute and Threatened Vessel Closure
Post balloon angioplasty (primary coronary angioplasty), lesion morphology was categorized according to the dissection criteria proposed by Huber et al,11 and coronary flow distal to the lesion was classified according to the TIMI criteria.12 Acute occlusion was defined as TIMI 0 flow. Threatened closure was defined as TIMI 1, 2, or 3 flow with visible dissection type C, D, E, or F or as dissection type A or B and TIMI 1, 2, or 3 flow with a residual diameter stenosis of >50%.11 12

Stent Implantation
Balloon angioplasty and stent deployment were performed according to standard clinical practice by the femoral approach at the Thoraxcenter (Rotterdam, Netherlands). Recent intracoronary ultrasound studies reported that atherosclerotic plaque is frequently present even in angiographically normal proximal reference segments in patients with significant coronary stenosis.13 14 We therefore used the MVD from on-line QCA, which would be expected to be closer to the original vessel diameter in the nondiseased condition compared with the more traditional use of the IRD for stent sizing. After determination of the MVD on the diameter function of the on-line QCA analysis system (in millimeters), a Wallstent with a nominal diameter of 1.0 mm greater than the MVD and nominal length 5 to 10 mm longer than the lesion length was selected (see Fig 1Down). Of the 44 stents used in 35 lesions, 3 were 4 mm in diameter, 11 were 4.5 mm in diameter, 10 were 5 mm in diameter, 15 were 5.5 mm in diameter, and 5 were 6 mm in diameter. Of the 44 stents, 3 were 18 mm long, 26 were 23 to 28 mm long, 8 were 35 mm long, and 7 were 42 mm long. Twenty-two patients received a single Wallstent, 7 received two Wallstents, and 1 had three Wallstents implanted. During the primary balloon angioplasty, the balloon diameter was 3.0±0.6 mm and the maximum inflation pressure was 10.6±3.1 atm. After delivery of the stent, high-pressure intrastent balloon inflations (14.2±3.3 atm) using balloon diameters of 4.0±0.6 mm to optimize stent expansion were performed in all 35 patients.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. QCA of the right coronary artery revealed that MLD was 0.97 mm, MVD was 4.26 mm, and lesion length was 30.0 mm (left). A Wallstent (5.5 mm in diameter and 35 mm long) that was 1.24 mm greater than the MVD was deployed, and partial contrast extravasation caused by balloon rupture was observed (middle). At 6-month follow-up, MLD decreased to 2.58 mm associated with a 14% residual DS; however, the extravasation was restored and restenosis was not observed (right).

Anticoagulant Therapy
At the beginning of the procedure, patients were given an intravenous bolus dose of 10 000 IU heparin and subsequently 5000 IU as required to maintain the activated clotting time >300 seconds throughout the procedure. All patients received 100 mg/d aspirin. The postintervention anticoagulant regimen was conventional15 : 1 hour after removal of the femoral sheath, an intravenous heparin infusion was commenced to maintain the activated partial thromboplastin time between 70 and 90 seconds until oral anticoagulant therapy (warfarin) had achieved a prothrombin time international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3.5. Warfarin was prescribed for 3 months post stent implantation, and aspirin indefinitely.16

QCA Analysis
The new version of the computer-based CAAS (CAAS II)16 was used to perform both the on-line QCA analysis (for immediate guidance of stent sizing in the catheterization laboratory) as well as the subsequent off-line cinefilm analysis. In the CAAS analysis, which has previously been described elsewhere,17 18 19 20 21 22 23 the entire cineframe, 18x24 mm, is digitized at a resolution of 1329x1772 pixels. Correction for pincushion distortion is performed before analysis. Boundaries of a selected coronary segment are detected automatically. The absolute diameter of the stenosis (in millimeters) is determined by use of the guiding catheter as a scaling device.24 To standardize the method of analysis of the initial and follow-up angiograms, the following measures were taken: all study frames selected for analysis were end-diastolic to minimize motion artifact, and arterial segments were measured between the same identifiable branch points after the administration of isosorbide dinitrate.25 26

QCA Parameters
Acute gain and late loss represent the improvement in MLD achieved at intervention (MLD post stenting minus MLD pre) and the changes at follow-up (MLD post stenting minus MLD at follow-up), respectively. Net gain (gain minus loss), net gain index (net gain divided by IRD pre), relative loss (loss divided by IRD pre), and loss index (loss divided by gain) were studied. Acute stent recoil (MLD during intrastent balloon inflation minus final MLD post stenting) and percent acute stent recoil (acute recoil divided by MLD during intrastent balloon inflation) were measured.27


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical Characteristics
The baseline clinical characteristics of the 35 patients are provided in Table 1Down. Thirty of the patients were men, and the mean age was 60±9 years (range, 40 to 76 years). Twenty-seven patients had stable angina, and 8 had unstable angina.28 Of the 8 patients with unstable angina, 5 had Braunwald type II and 3 had type III.28


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of 35 Patients

Angiographic Characteristics
The angiographic characteristics of the treated lesions are given in Table 2Down. Of 35 lesions, 22 were in the right coronary artery, 11 were in the left anterior descending coronary artery, and the remaining 2 were in the circumflex coronary artery. Seven of the lesions were ostial, and 16 were at sites of a bifurcation. Pre balloon angioplasty, the lesions were categorized according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force criteria.29 Of the 35 lesions, 1 was type A, 22 were type B, and the remaining 12 were type C. Post primary balloon angioplasty and before Wallstent implantation, 1 lesion had a type A dissection, 6 a type B dissection, 24 a type C dissection, 2 a type D dissection, and 2 a type F dissection.11 TIMI flow12 was grade 0 in 2 lesions, grade 2 in 1 lesion, and grade 3 in 32 lesions. Intracoronary thrombus (intraluminal filling defect on angiography) was evident in 8 lesions.30


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Angiographic Lesion Characteristics of 35 Lesions

Clinical Outcome
Stent deployment was successful in 44 of 44 stents (100%) in 35 patients. Fig 2Down shows the clinical outcome of the 35 patients. One patient with a dilated but unstented lesion proximal to the stented segment sustained a subacute occlusion on day 1 associated with a Q-wave myocardial infarction (creatine phosphokinase, 1840 IU/L) and was subsequently treated by proximal implantation of a Palmaz-Schatz stent. The event-free survival at 30-day follow-up was 97% (34 of 35 patients). Of the 34 patients eligible for 6-month angiographic follow-up, 3 who were asymptomatic declined repeat angiography. Angiographic restenosis (>50% DS) was observed in 5 of 31 patients (16%) at 6 months, all of whom underwent repeat angioplasty. Thus, the overall event-free survival at 6-month follow-up was 83% (29 of 35 patients).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Flow chart of outcome after Wallstent implantation in native coronary arteries. pt indicates patient; F-up, follow-up angiogram.

QCA Analysis
Table 3Down shows the relationship between the nominal diameter and length of the Wallstents selected and QCA analysis results. The average nominal diameter of the Wallstents used was 1.40 mm greater than the MVD and 9.4 mm longer than the lesion length. Fig 3Down provides an example of the serial angiographic outcome in an individual patient; Fig 4Down displays the results of serial luminal diameter changes measured by QCA analysis for the study population. MLD was 0.83±0.50 mm pre intervention. Post stent implantation, high-pressure intrastent balloon dilatation of 14.2±3.3 atm with balloons 4.0±0.6 mm in diameter was performed in all lesions. Implantation of the Wallstent increased the MLD to 3.06±0.48 mm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Quantitative Coronary Angiographic Results of Wallstent Implantation



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Coronary angiography of the right coronary artery in a patient with dissection after primary balloon angioplasty. Pre balloon angioplasty, the MLD was 0.71 mm, the IRD was 3.61 mm associated with 80% DS, and the MVD was 4.07 mm (A). Post balloon angioplasty, the lumen had enlarged; however, a type C dissection with TIMI 3 flow was present (B). A Wallstent (nominal diameter of 5.0 mm and 23 mm long) that was nearly 1.0 mm greater than the MVD was deployed, and the radiopaque stent markers can be seen during the deployment (C). Post stent balloon dilatation (4.0 mmx20 mm) at 16 atm was performed (D). Post Wallstent deployment, MLD was 3.71 mm, which was greater than IRD pre deployment (3.61 mm) associated with 9% residual diameter stenosis (E). Six-month follow-up angiography revealed no restenosis, with an MLD of 3.43 mm associated with a 19% DS (F).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Changes of MLD and IRD in 35 lesions from pre procedure through stent implantation to 6-month follow-up. Post stent delivery, high-pressure intrastent balloon inflation (14.2±3.3 atm) was performed in all 35 lesions.

Acute stent recoil and percent acute stent recoil were 0.52±0.31 mm and 14±8%. Acute gain was 2.23±0.63 mm, late loss 0.78±0.61 mm, net gain 1.47±0.92 mm, net gain index 0.55±0.37, relative loss 0.29±0.23, and loss index 0.38±0.37. Angiographic success (<30% residual diameter stenosis) was achieved in all lesions (100%). Of the 31 patients who underwent follow-up angiography, 5 had angiographic restenosis, yielding an angiographic restenosis rate of 16% (5 of 31 patients). Fig 5Down shows the sequential changes in % DS for the study population. Average % DS decreased significantly from 72% pre intervention to a final residual value of 28% at follow-up.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Changes in % DS from pre procedure to post stent implantation in 35 lesions. The % DS was 28% at follow-up.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The novel findings of this study were as follows. (1) Delivery of the new, less shortening Wallstent to the target lesion can be achieved in a high proportion of cases (44 of 44 stents). (2) After delivery of the stent, angiographic success as defined by <30% residual diameter stenosis can be achieved with high-pressure intrastent balloon inflations in a high proportion of cases (35 of 35 lesions). (3) Despite the bailout indication, oversizing of the stent diameter and complete coverage of the lesion length resulted in a low risk of subacute stent thrombosis (3%) and subsequently conveyed a low restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up (16%).

Procedural Outcome
The high successful delivery rate of the Wallstent may be attributed to a number of factors. First, the 1.57-mm profile of the unexpanded Wallstent delivery system compares favorably with that of other stents, and thus, an intraprocedural exchange of the guiding catheter should rarely be necessary.2 Second, the unconnected junctions of each filament of the Wallstent enhance the longitudinal flexibility of the stent to aid the negotiation of tortuous vessels. Third, the protective rolling membrane of the Wallstent prevents dislodgment of the stent off the delivery system during the delivery process to the target lesion. Fourth, the operators who implanted the stents have extensive previous experience with the Wallstent delivery system, which relative to other stents is user-unfriendly and has a longer learning curve.

Early Outcome
Previous studies of bailout stenting have been reported for the Gianturco-Roubin stent,31 32 33 34 35 the Palmaz-Schatz stent,36 37 38 39 40 the original Wallstent prototype,7 8 and the new AVE Microstent.41 These have been associated with a deployment success rate of 89% to 100%, a myocardial infarction rate of 4% to 43%, a coronary bypass surgery rate of 0% to 60%, and a subacute thrombosis rate of 7% to 16%. In the present study, 34 of 35 lesions had dissection types B, C, D, E, and F, with a lesion length of >18 mm after primary angioplasty; however, stenting was effective in tacking back the dissection flap and restoring TIMI 3 flow in all 35 lesions. Although 7 of the lesions had angiographic evidence of intracoronary thrombus before stenting, deployment of the Wallstent without the administration of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy resulted in a low subacute thrombosis rate (3%). Complete coverage of the dissection flaps (average stent length, 35.6 mm) and optimal stent expansion by high-pressure intrastent balloon inflation (14.2±3.3 atm) of the oversized new, self-expanding Wallstent are all factors that may have contributed to the low rate of subacute thrombosis and a low risk of early clinical events.42

Late Outcome
While the reported angiographic restenosis rates (>=50% DS at follow-up) have ranged from 21% to 53% for the Gianturco-Roubin stent,31 32 33 34 35 43 13% to 38% for the Palmaz-Schatz stent,10 36 37 38 39 40 44 45 and 14% to 34% for the original Wallstent prototype,3 4 5 the angiographic restenosis rate in this study was 16%. In our study, the oversized Wallstent resulted in larger MLD post stenting (3.06 mm) that was even greater than the reference vessel diameter pre intervention (2.92 mm). While in previous stent studies, acute luminal gain at stent implantation has ranged from 1.40 to 1.95 mm and late loss at follow-up from 0.65 mm to 0.92 mm associated with restenosis rates ranging from 22% to 38%,10 16 39 44 in our study, acute luminal gain at the stent implantation was 2.23 mm and late loss at follow-up was 0.78 mm associated with a restenosis rate of 16%. The low loss index of 0.38 and large net gain index of 0.55 indicate that our policy of oversizing of the new Wallstent results in sufficient mechanical remodeling of the vessel to enable accommodation of the limited luminal loss and resultant low restenosis rate. Although the presence of dissection has not been found to convey a more favorable angiographic outcome after balloon angioplasty,46 the vessels in which the internal elastic lamina has been disrupted before stent placement may be more predisposed to a greater initial luminal gain post stenting. The increased arterial distensibility resulting from significant dissections might also contribute to an improved long-term angiographic outcome in a stented vessel compared with a stented vessel without significant dissection. This may be one of the elements contributing to our more favorable loss index compared with that recently reported for elective stenting in the BENESTENT and STRESS studies.10 16 It should be acknowledged that adoption of an oversizing policy with more rigid balloon-expandable stents such as the Palmaz-Schatz stent may be entirely inappropriate and unsafe, and the implications of our study should be limited to the self-expanding new Wallstent. Furthermore, it remains to be seen (a multicenter trial with the new Wallstent has been initiated) whether such a policy can be safely executed at other centers with less experience with the Wallstent.

Study Limitations
The number of patients reported in this early single-center experience is small, and further multicenter experience with this new stent design will be required before our policy of oversizing of the new, less shortening Wallstent can be recommended.

Conclusions
Despite the indication of bailout management and the selection of long, dissected lesions, implantation of the oversized new Wallstent conveys a favorable acute and 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome. The enforced mechanical remodeling by the oversized self-expanding Wallstent may result in prevention of subacute occlusion and chronic recoil of the vessel and subsequently improved restenosis rates at follow-up.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CAAS = coronary angiography analysis system
% DS = percent diameter stenosis
IRD = interpolated reference diameter
MLD = minimal luminal diameter
MVD = maximal vessel diameter
QCA = quantitative coronary angiography


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Ozaki is a recipient of a grant from Takeda Medical Research (Taisha Ijo) Foundation, Osaka, Japan. Dr Keane is a recipient of a travel grant from the Peel Medical Research Trust, London, UK. We gratefully acknowledge Dr Masakiyo Nobuyoshi for his helpful advice. We thank Marie-Angèle Morel for her preparation of the figures.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC, Professor of Interventional Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Received September 5, 1995; revision received December 28, 1995; accepted January 2, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Keane D, Buis B, Reifart N, Plokker TH, Ernst J, Mast E, Renkin J, Heyndrickx G, Morel M, de Jaegere P, Serruys PW. Clinical and angiographic outcome following implantation of the new less shortening Wallstent in aorto-coronary vein grafts: introduction of a second generation stent in the clinical arena. J Intervent Cardiol. 1994;7:557-564. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Keane D, de Jaegere P, Serruys PW. Structural design, clinical experience and current indications of the coronary Wallstent. Cardiol Clin. 1994;12:689-697. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Sigwart U, Puel J, Mircowitch V, Joffre F, Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:701-706. [Abstract]
  4. Serruys PW, Strauss BH, Beatt KJ, Bertrand ME, Puel J, Rickards A, Meier B, Goy JJ, Vogt P, Kappenberger L, Sigwart U. Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary artery stent. N Engl J Med. 1991;334:13-17. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Strauss BH, Serruys PW, Bertrand ME, Puel J, Meier B, Goy JJ, Kappenberger L, Rickards AF, Sigwart U. Quantitative angiographic follow-up of the coronary Wallstent in native vessels and bypass grafts (European experience March 1986 to March 1990). Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:475-481. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. deScheerder IK, Strauss BH, de Feyter PJ, Beatt KJ, Baur LHB, Wihns W, Heyndrickx G, Suryapranata H, van den Brand M, Buis B, Serruys PW. Stenting of venous bypass grafts: a new treatment modality for patients who are poor candidates for reintervention. Am Heart J. 1992;123:1046-1054. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Sigwart U, Urban P, Golf S, Kaufmann U, Imbert C, Fisher A, Kappenberger L. Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1988;78:1121-1127. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. de Feyter PJ, DeScheerder I, van den Brand M, Laarman GJ, Suryapranata H, Serruys PW. Emergency stenting for refractory acute coronary occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:1147-1150. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Rensing BJ, Hermans WRM, Vos J, Beatt KJ, Bossuyt P, Rutsch W, Serruys PW. Angiographic risk factors of luminal narrowing after coronary balloon angioplasty using balloon measurements to reflect stretch and elastic recoil at the dilatation site. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:584-591. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn IM, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, Cleman MW, Heuser R, Almond D, Teirstein PS, Fish RD, Colombo A, Brinker J, Moses J, Shaknovich A, Hirshfeld J, Bailey S, Ellis S, Rake R, Goldberg S. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496-501. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, Mooney MR. Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:467-471. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. The TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932-936. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, Fitzgerald PJ, Stadius ML, Popp RL. Intravascular imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: an in vivo comparison with quantitative angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:952-958. [Abstract]
  14. Leung WH, Alderman EL, Lee TC, Stadius ML. Quantitative arteriography of apparently normal coronary segments with nearby or distant disease suggests presence of occult nonvisualized atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:311-317. [Abstract]
  15. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, Belardi J, Sigwart U, Colombo A, Goy JJ, van den Heuvel P, Delcan J, Morel MA, on behalf of the BENESTENT Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489-495. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Haase J, Escaned J, van Swijndregt EM, Ozaki Y, Gronenschild E, Slager CJ, Serruys PW. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;30:104-114. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Serruys PW, Booman F, Troost GJ, Reiber JHC, Gerbrands JJ, van den Brand M, Cherrier F, Hugenholtz PG. Computerized quantitative coronary angiography applied to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: advantages and limitations. In: Kaltenbach M, Gruentzig A, Rentrop K, Bussmann WD, eds. Transluminal Coronary Angiography and Intracoronary Thrombolysis. Coronary Heart Disease IV. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1982:110-124.
  18. Serruys PW, Foley DP, de Feyter PJ, eds. Quantitative Angiography in Clinical Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994.
  19. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Herrman JP, Foley D, Haase J, den Boer A, Di Mario C, Serruys PW. Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis: an experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings. Am Heart J. 1995;129:471-475. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Serruys PW. Fluctuation of spastic location: a quantitative angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1606-1614. [Abstract]
  21. Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, van Swijndregt EM, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, di Mario C, Kirkeeide R, Serruys PW. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems: results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation. 1995;91:2174-2183. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Serruys PW. Progression and regression of coronary stenosis in the long-term follow-up of vasospastic angina. Circulation. 1995;92:2446-2456. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Nobuyoshi M, Hamasaki N, Popma JJ, Serruys PW. Coronary lumen at 6 month follow-up of the new radiopaque Cordis tantalum stent using quantitative angiography and intracoronary ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1135-1143. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Herrmann JP, Keane D, Ozaki Y, den Boer A, Serruys PW. Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: a quantitative analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994;33:55-60. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Keane D, Serruys PW. Quantitative coronary angiography: an integral component of interventional cardiology. In: Topol EJ, Serruys PW, eds. Current Review of Interventional Cardiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Current Medicine; 1995:205-233.
  26. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Serruys PW. Relationship of basal coronary tone and vasospastic activity in patients with variant angina: a quantitative angiographic study. Br Heart J. 1996;75:267-273. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hermans WRM, Rensing BJ, Strauss BH, Serruys PW. Methodological problems related to the quantitative assessment of stretch, elastic recoil and balloon-artery ratio. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;25:174-185. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Braunwald E. Unstable angina: a classification. Circulation. 1989;80:410-414. [Free Full Text]
  29. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King SB III, Loop FD, Peterson KL, Reeves TJ, Williams DO, Winters WL Jr. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (subcommittee on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). Circulation. 1988;78:486-502. [Free Full Text]
  30. Capone G, Wolf NM, Meyer B, Meister SG. Frequency of intracoronary filling defects by angiography in angina pectoris at rest. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:403-406. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, Macander PJ, Dean LS, Baxley WA, Breland J. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:916-927. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hearn JA, King SB, Douglas JS, Carlin SF, Lembo NJ, Ghazzal ZMB. Clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary artery stenting for acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: initial results with a balloon-expandable, stainless steel design. Circulation. 1993;88:2086-2096. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lincoff AM, Topol EJ, Chapekis AT, George BS, Candela RJ, Muller DW, Zimmerman CA, Ellis SG. Intracoronary stenting compared with conventional therapy for abrupt vessel closure complicating coronary angioplasty: a matched case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:866-875. [Abstract]
  34. George BS, Voorhees WD, Roubin GS, Fearnot NE, Pinkerton A, Raizner AE, King SB, Holmes DR, Topol EJ, Kereiakes DJ, Hartzler GO. Multicenter investigation of coronary stenting to treat acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:135-143. [Abstract]
  35. Sutton JM, Ellis SG, Roubin GS, Pinkerton GA, King SB, Raizner AE, Holmes DR, Kereiakes DJ, Topol EJ for the Gianturco-Roubin Intracoronary Stent Investigator Group. Major clinical events after coronary stenting: the multicenter registry of acute and elective Gianturco-Roubin stent placement. Circulation. 1994;89:1126-1137. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Herrmann HC, Buchbinder M, Clemen MW, Fishman D, Goldberg S, Leon MB, Schatz RA, Tierstein P, Walker CM, Hirshfeld JW. Emergent use of balloon-expandable coronary artery stenting for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;86:812-819. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Haude M, Erbel R, Straub U, Dietz U, Schatz R, Meyer J. Results of intracoronary stents for management of coronary dissection after balloon angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:691-696. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Schömig A, Kastrati A, Mudra H, Blasini R, Schühlen H, Klauss V, Richardt G, Neumann FJ. Four-year experience with Palmaz-Schatz stenting in coronary angioplasty complicated by dissection with threatened or present vessel closure. Circulation. 1994;90:2716-2724. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Schömig A, Kastrati A, Dietz R, Rauch B, Neumann FJ, Katus HH, Busch U. Emergency coronary stenting for dissection during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: angiographic follow-up after stenting and after repeat angioplasty of the stented segment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1053-1060. [Abstract]
  40. Colombo A, Goldberg SL, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Finci L. A novel strategy for stent deployment in the treatment of acute or threatened closure complicating balloon coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1887-1891. [Abstract]
  41. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Ruykrok P, de Feyter PJ, Stertzer S, Serruys PW. Acute clinical and angiographic results with the new AVE micro coronary stent in bailout management. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:112-116. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Martini G, Gaglione A, Goldberg SL, Tobis JM. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation. 1995;91:1676-1688. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Rodriguez AE, Santaera O, Larribau M, Fernandez M, Sarmiento R, Baliño NP, Newell JB, Roubin GS, Palacios IF. Coronary stenting decreases restenosis in lesions with early loss in luminal diameter 24 hours after successful PTCA. Circulation. 1995;91:1397-1402. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Savage MP, Fischman DL, Schatz RA, Teirstein PS, Leon MB, Baim DS, Ellis S, Topol EJ, Hirshfeld J, Cleman MW, Buchbinder M, Bailey S, Heuser R, Walker CM, Curry RC Jr, Gebhardt S, Rake R, Goldberg S, on behalf of the Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after implantation of a balloon-expandable stent in the native coronary circulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1207-1212. [Abstract]
  45. Kimura T, Nosaka H, Yokoi H, Iwabuchi M, Nobuyoshi M. Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1557-1563. [Abstract]
  46. Hermans WM, Rensing BJ, Foley DP, Decker JW, Rutsch W, Emanuelsson H, Danchin N, Wijns W, Chappuis F, Serruys PW. Therapeutic dissection after successful coronary balloon angioplasty: no influence on restenosis or on clinical outcome in 693 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:767-780.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Berkefeld, B. Turowski, A. Dietz, H. Lanfermann, M. Sitzer, T. Schmitz-Rixen, H. Steinmetz, and F. E. Zanella
Recanalization Results after Carotid Stent Placement
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.W. Serruys, D.P. Foley, M. Pieper, J.A. Kleijne, and P.J. de Feyter on behalf of the TRAPIST investigators
The TRAPIST Study. A multicentre randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of trapidil for prevention of restenosis after coronary stenting, measured by 3-D intravascular ultrasound
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2001; 22(20): 1938 - 1947.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. Wentzel, R. Krams, J. C. H. Schuurbiers, J. A. Oomen, J. Kloet, W. J. van der Giessen, P. W. Serruys, and C. J. Slager
Relationship Between Neointimal Thickness and Shear Stress After Wallstent Implantation in Human Coronary Arteries
Circulation, April 3, 2001; 103(13): 1740 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Kornowski, B. Bhargava, D. M. S. Fuchs, A. J. Lansky, L. F. Satler, A. D. Pichard, M. K. Hong, K. M. Kent, R. Mehran, G. W. Stone, et al.
Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after percutaneous interventions using long (>=25 mm) versus short (<20 mm) stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2000; 35(3): 612 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. R. Holmes Jr., J. Hirshfeld Jr., D. Faxon, R. Vlietstra, A. Jacobs, S. B. King III, T. M. Bashore, N. D. Bridges, C. B. Higgins, L. F. Hiratzka, et al.
ACC expert consensus document on coronary artery stents: Document of the American College of Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1471 - 1482.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Ozaki, A. G. Violaris, T. Kobayashi, D. Keane, E. Camenzind, C. Di Mario, P. de Feyter, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and P. W. Serruys
Comparison of Coronary Luminal Quantification Obtained From Intracoronary Ultrasound and Both Geometric and Videodensitometric Quantitative Angiography Before and After Balloon Angioplasty and Directional Atherectomy
Circulation, July 15, 1997; 96(2): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.