(Circulation. 1996;93:1083-1086.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Heart Lung Institute, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Utrecht, the Netherlands (F.H.M.W.), and the Cardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Okla.
Correspondence to Fred H.M. Wittkampf, PhD, Heart Lung Institute, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail j.a.vangestel@hli.azu.nl.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Using the thigh muscle preparation, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-second pulses were applied at 30 to 40 W via a standard 4-mm tip electrode with 10-g contact pressure. Forty-one undisturbed pulses were delivered while recording intramural temperatures at 2-, 4-, and 7-mm depth. Maximal "thermal latency" was observed with the shortest pulse duration and at greatest depth. With 5-second applications, tissue temperature at 7-mm depth peaked 11.6 seconds after termination of radiofrequency delivery and stayed above end-of-pulse value as long as 34.5 seconds after the pulse. The additional rise in tissue temperature was 2.9°C. If only recordings within the lesion border zone were considered, the duration of latency was maximal with 10-second pulses: an additional gain in tissue temperature of 3.4°C was observed 6.4 seconds after the pulse while tissue temperature stayed above end-of-pulse value during 18.3 seconds.
Conclusions With relatively short applications, tissue temperature continues to rise after termination of radiofrequency delivery. This "thermal latency" may result in lesion growth after the pulse and may so explain the incidentally observed progression of conduction block after short pulses in the vicinity of the atrioventricular node. It also may explain the apparent discrepancy between lesion growth rate and intramural temperature rise studies.
Key Words: ablation conduction atrioventricular node catheter
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
During RF application, a very thin rim of tissue in contact with the ablation electrode is heated resistively while surrounding tissue is heated by radial conduction of heat predominantly.1 2 3 4 5 6 Termination of RF delivery will immediately eliminate resistive heating of tissue in contact with the ablation electrode. The temperature of that tissue, however, may temporarily remain higher than surrounding tissue, and radial heat flow may continue.
In the present study, we investigated the hypothesis that RF pulses can result in an intramural temperature rise that continues after termination of RF delivery.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ablation Protocol
After the ablation electrode was positioned
and the fluoroptic
probes were inserted, the cradle was filled with blood and circulation
in the cradle was started as previously described.7 RF
energy was randomly applied for 5, 10, 20, or 30 seconds at various
sites on the thigh muscle. RF energy was supplied by a 500-kHz voltage
source generator (ACAC). Depending on the observed ablation impedance,
RF voltage was set at values between 45 and 60 V to obtain an RF power
level between 30 and 40 W. Distances between successive ablation sites
were chosen to avoid lesion overlap. RF ablation was interrupted in the
event of a sudden rise in impedance >10
or audible
"pops."7 8 After each RF pulse, the
cradle was
depleted of blood and the ablation site was examined for catheter tip
dislocation and coagulum formation. After approximately 10 pulses, the
skin incision was closed, and the dog was turned onto its other side.
The procedure was then repeated on the other thigh muscle.
Data Analysis
RF voltage, average impedance, pulse duration,
tip electrode,
and intramural temperatures were analyzed by means of the Bard
LabSystem. From each intramural temperature recording, the
end-of-pulse temperature was measured together with the
following three characteristics of local thermal latency (Fig
2
): (1) timing of maximum temperature, (2) time between
termination of the pulse and point at which temperature returned to
end-of-pulse value, and (3) additional rise in temperature
after the pulse.
|
A hypothetical local tissue temperature rise after termination of RF delivery is only clinically relevant if it can create additional transient or permanent damage.9 10 We therefore separately analyzed those temperature curves with an end-of-pulse and/or maximum tissue temperature between 45°C and 55°C.
Statistical Analysis
The effects of pulse duration, depth,
and end-of-pulse
temperature on the three above-mentioned characteristics of thermal
latency were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and multiple
regression analysis with pulse duration, depth, and
end-of-pulse temperature as covariates. A value of
P<.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thermal Latency
As illustrated in Fig 2
,
tissue temperature gradually rises during
RF delivery, as expected. This rise, however, continues after
termination of RF delivery. The shape of these curves was affected by
pulse duration and recording depth. Both the timing of maximum
temperature and duration until return to end-of-pulse
temperature were reached significantly later (P<.001) with
shorter pulse durations and at greater depth, with a significant
interaction (P<.01) between the latter two
parameters. The magnitude of the additional rise in
temperature after the pulse decreased with increasing pulse duration
(P<.001) but was unaffected by depth
(P=.8).
Multiple regression analysis revealed that of the three characteristics of thermal latency, only the duration until return to end-of-pulse temperature was significantly affected by the end-of-pulse temperature with a shorter duration at higher temperatures. Thermal latency was absent in all tip temperature recordings; tip temperature invariably fell instantly at termination of RF delivery.
In 31 of the 123 recordings, the
end-of-pulse or
maximum temperature reached a value between 45°C and 55°C (Table
2
). The average depth at which these curves were recorded
increased
with increasing pulse duration (P<.001) as the result of
growth of the lesion during RF application. The magnitude of the three
characteristics of thermal latency, listed at various pulse durations
in Table 2
, therefore reflects the direct effect of pulse
duration but
also the simultaneously affected depth of the lesion border
zone. In these tracings, the intervals from end-of-pulse to
maximum temperature and the return to end-of-pulse temperature
are maximal with a 10-second pulse duration, 6.4 and 18.3 seconds,
respectively, with an average additional rise of 3.4°C.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of the growth of the lesion with increasing pulse duration, the
thermal latency in the border zone of the lesion (Table 2
)
reflects the
combined effect of pulse duration and depth. With a duration of latency
that decreases with increasing pulse duration and increases with
increasing depth, the decrease in latency with increasing pulse
duration in the border zone is less dramatic than when all
recordings (Table 1
) are considered. This
explains why the duration of latency in the lesion border zone after 5-
and 20-second pulses is similar (Table 2
). The
additional rise in temperature, however, still decreases with
increasing pulse duration (P<.001) because this latter
parameter only depends on pulse duration.
|
The observed thermal latency may explain a progression of conduction block directly after short RF pulses in the vicinity of the atrioventricular node but will also play a role in all other radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Premature interruption of RF application in the vicinity of the atrioventricular node caused by unintentional lengthening of atrioventricular conduction delay may be one of the few occasions where thermal latency becomes clinically manifest.
A rise in tissue temperature after short RF exposures may explain the
apparent discrepancy between tissue temperature rise and lesion growth
studies.6 11 While intramural temperatures continue
to
rise during RF delivery even after 60
seconds,1 3 4 7 12
lesion size appears to mature within 20 to 30
seconds.1 13 14 15 The main
difference between these two
types of study is that lesion size is measured some time after delivery
of RF energy, whereas tissue temperatures are recorded during RF
delivery. Potentially ablative effects of a tissue temperature rise
after termination of RF delivery are thus not accounted for in the
latter studies. If we arbitrarily define the duration of an RF
"pulse" in the border zone as start-of-pulse until return
of tissue temperature to end-of-pulse value, a 5-, 10-, 20-,
and 30-second pulse is lengthened to approximately 16, 28, 30, and 35
seconds (Table 2
). The difference in lesion size between a 10-
and
20-second pulse is small, probably not because the lesion does not grow
in that interval but because the difference in "thermal" pulse
duration is much less than 10 seconds: it is only a 2-second
lengthening of a 28-second pulse if we use the above-mentioned
definition of "pulse" duration. In other words, the time scale of
lesion growth during RF application measured at
necropsy1 13 14 15 is
transformed by the tissue temperature
rise directly after RF delivery. Lesion growth curves should therefore
be interpreted such that lesions listed at, for example, 10 seconds, do
not reach their size at 10 seconds but only after a full 10-second
pulse, including the thermal latency effect after the pulse.
Excluded Pulses
Eighteen of the 59 pulses were disturbed by a
sudden temperature
discontinuity, usually in combination with an audible "pop,"
suggesting intramural boiling.7 8 These
discontinuities
disabled a sensible analysis of the curves, which were
therefore excluded from analysis. In our series, these
discontinuities only occurred during RF application and never
thereafter. This is not in disagreement with the observed thermal
latency effect. The presence of thermal latency was postulated within
the conductively heated zone around the hottest, resistively heated
zone in contact with the ablation electrode. Within the latter area,
elimination of resistive heating at termination of RF delivery will
immediately result in a drop in temperature. Moreover, a transition of
intramural temperature from below 100°C during the pulse to above
100°C after the pulse was not observed in our series. This may
explain the absence of "pops" after RF applications.
An intramural temperature above 100°C was only observed in 3 of these 18 pulses. This may be due to a practical limitation of our tissue temperature recording technique. Tissue surface temperatures were measured as close as possible to but not at the electrode-tissue contact site while the first intramural temperature was recorded at 2-mm depth. Higher intramural temperatures closer to the tissue surface would thus have been missed.
Limitations of the Study
This study was performed in the
thigh muscle preparation with
standardized tip orientation and pressure. Differences between this
experimental setup and the clinical situation may affect the precise
characteristics of thermal latency.7
The repetition rate of the Luxtron model 3000-4 resulted in a temperature read-out every 0.4 seconds. This resolution may have affected the accuracy of our time measurements. During analysis, however, we have attempted to compensate for this limited resolution by interpolation of the stepped tissue temperature tracings.
The observation that the temperatures recorded with the fiber
at
the tissue surface stayed relatively low (<45°C) during 20 of the 41
pulses suggests that on average, the fluoroptic probes were positioned
at the correct depth within the tissue. Nevertheless, the depth of the
probes may have varied slightly between different ablation sites, which
may have affected the data listed in Table 1
. The precise
position of
the probes, however, is not relevant for the clinically more important
duration of latency as listed in Table 2
. With the
above-mentioned
temperature range criterion, we investigated the thermal latency effect
in the border zone of the lesion irrespective of the actual depth of
that border.
The RF generator used in this study was voltage controlled, whereas most clinically used generators are power regulated. When initial power is set to the same value, the only difference between both types of generator is their response to a change in impedance during RF application. With a power-controlled generator, a 10% drop in impedance will result in an approximately 5% decrease in RF voltage and a 5% increase in RF current. With a voltage controlled generator, this will lead to a 10% increase in RF current and total power. It is unlikely that this difference will lead to a different thermal latency effect after the pulse because it is the total amount of heat generated during the pulse and its delayed conduction into surrounding tissue that is responsible for the thermal latency effect.
Conclusions
With short (5 to 30 seconds) RF applications,
tissue temperature
continues to rise after termination of RF delivery. This "thermal
latency" may result in lesion growth after termination of RF
delivery and may so explain the apparent discrepancy between lesion
growth and tissue temperature rise studies. Thermal latency may explain
incidentally observed phenomena occurring shortly after RF applications
such as progression of conduction block after short pulses in the
vicinity of the atrioventricular node.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 25, 1995; revision received December 27, 1995; accepted January 2, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. K. Bruce, T. J. Bunch, M. A. Milton, A. Sarabanda, S. B. Johnson, and D. L. Packer Discrepancies Between Catheter Tip and Tissue Temperature in Cooled-Tip Ablation: Relevance to Guiding Left Atrial Ablation Circulation, August 16, 2005; 112(7): 954 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Bunch, G. K. Bruce, S. B. Johnson, A. Sarabanda, M. A. Milton, and D. L. Packer Analysis of Catheter-Tip (8-mm) and Actual Tissue Temperatures Achieved During Radiofrequency Ablation at the Orifice of the Pulmonary Vein Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 2988 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Tan, R. Kam Ming Li, and W. S. Teo Power Versus Temperature-Controlled Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2001; 9(2): 115 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Erdogan, J. Carlsson, S. Grumbrecht, S. Kostin, B. Schulte, M. Schlapp, J. Neuzner, and H. F. Pitschner Electrochemical potentials during radiofrequency energy delivery: a new method to control catheter ablation of arrhythmias Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 201 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakagawa, F. H. M. Wittkampf, W. S. Yamanashi, J. V. Pitha, S. Imai, B. Campbell, M. Arruda, R. Lazzara, and W. M. Jackman Inverse Relationship Between Electrode Size and Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Ablation With Active Electrode Cooling Circulation, August 4, 1998; 98(5): 458 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |