(Circulation. 1996;94:2364-2368.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Hematology and Vascular Biology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Cardiology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC; and the Division of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (T.A.F.).
Correspondence to Andrew J. Carter, DO, Cardiology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Thirty-seven swine underwent placement of 35 nonradioactive and 39 ß-particleemitting stents with activity levels of 23.0, 14.0, 6.0, 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.15 µCi of 32P. Treatment effect was assessed by histological analysis 28 days after stent placement. Neointimal and medial smooth muscle cell density were inversely related to increasing stent activity. The neointima of the high-activity (3.0- to 23.0-µCi) stents consisted of fibrin, erythrocytes, occasional inflammatory cells, and smooth muscle cells with partial endothelialization of the luminal surface. In the 1.0-µCi stents, the neointima was expanded and consisted of smooth muscle cells and a proteoglycan-rich matrix. The neointima of the low-activity (0.15- and 0.5-µCi) stents was composed of smooth muscle cells and matrix with complete endothelialization of the luminal surface. At low and high stent activities, there was a reduction in neointimal area (low, 1.63±0.67 mm2 and high, 1.73±0.97 mm2 versus control, 2.40±0.87 mm2) and percent area stenosis (low, 26±7% and high, 26±12%) compared with control stents (37±12%, P
.01). The 1.0-µCi stents, however, had greater neointimal formation (4.67±1.50 mm2) and more luminal narrowing (64±16%) than the control stents (P<.0001).
Conclusions The differential response to the doses of continuous ß-particle irradiation used in this experimental model suggests a complex biological interaction of endovascular radiation and vascular repair after stent placement. Further study is required to determine the clinical potential for this therapy to prevent stent restenosis.
Key Words: stenosis stents arteries
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous experimental studies, several investigators have shown that endovascular radiation before stentplacement or delivered via a radioactive stent effectively inhibits neointimal formation.7 8 9 Waksman et al7 reported a reduction in neointimal formation after placement of oversized stents in porcine coronary arteries with low-dose radiation delivered from 192Ir and 90Sr/Y sources before stent implantation. Hehrlein et al8 showed that a stainless steel stent made radioactive in a cyclotron with a composition of the
- and ß-particleemitting radionuclides 55,56,57Co, 52Mg, and 55Fe inhibits neointimal proliferation after implantation in nondiseased rabbit iliac arteries. We and others9 10 have demonstrated the efficacy of low-dose endovascular radiation via a ß-particleemitting stent to inhibit neointimal formation after placement in porcine and rabbit iliac arteries. ß-Particle irradiation with 32P offers the advantages of a short half-life (14.3 days) and shallow penetration (3 to 4 mm) to reduce the risk to surrounding nontarget tissue. The objective of the present study was to investigate the dose-response effects of ß-particle irradiation from a stent implanted with 32P ions in a porcine model of coronary restenosis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
rays. The radiation levels at implantation were determined by methods previously described.10 The ß-particleemitting stents were implanted at approximate activity levels of 23.0, 14.0, 6.0, 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.15 µCi. Fig 1
1800 cGy delivered by a 0.5-µCi-activity stent to the vessel 0.1 mm from the wires. The radiation dose delivered over the 28-day study was equivalent to three fourths of the dose that would be delivered over the lifetime of the 32P stent.
|
Animal Model
The model used for these experimental studies was similar to previous investigations in our laboratory and those reported by others.13 14 Thirty-seven Yucatan miniature swine underwent placement of 74 stents (35 control, 39 ß-particle) in the left anterior descending, circumflex, or right coronary artery. Animals received aspirin 650 mg, nifedipine extended-release 30 mg, and ticlopidine 250 mg PO the evening before stent placement. Under general anesthesia, an 8F sheath was placed retrograde in the right carotid artery, and heparin 150 U/kg was administered to achieve an activated clotting time >300 seconds. Stents were manually crimped onto noncompliant angioplasty balloons 3.0 or 3.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm long (SCIMED). After completion of angiography, the 7-mm stents were implanted to obtain 10% to 20% oversizing compared with the baseline vessel diameter. Placement of the stent was completed with two balloon inflations at 12 to 14 atm for 30 seconds. Animals were allowed to recover and were returned to care facilities in which they received a normal diet and aspirin 81 mg daily. In addition, the animals were treated with ticlopidine 250 mg PO for 2 days after stent implantation. The animals were returned for coronary angiography at 28 days after implantation.
Histology
Immediately after angiography, the animals were euthanatized with a lethal dose of barbiturate. The hearts were then harvested, and the coronary arteries were perfusion-fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin at 60 to 80 mm Hg for 30 minutes via the aortic stump. The stented coronary artery segments were carefully dissected from the epicardial surface of the heart. A central cross section was cut, and then the proximal and distal portions were longitudinally sectioned for examination of 20 stents in the first 14 hearts. One half of the proximal transverse section was used to take a hemicross section of the stent. The stent wires were then removed from this hemicross section under a dissecting microscope, and the tissue was processed for paraffin embedding after dehydration in a graded series of alcohols and xylene. These sections were examined by scanning electron microscopy according to previously described techniques.4 The central cross section of the stent, including the wires, was processed, embedded in methyl methacrylate, and then cut at 4 µm. The remaining 51 stents were each cut into two sections, processed, embedded in methyl methacrylate, and then cut at 4 µm. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Movat pentachrome stains for qualitative analysis.
Studies of Vessel Morphometry and Cell Density
The cross-sectional area of each midstent section was measured with computer-assisted digital morphometry to determine the areas within the external elastic lamina, internal elastic lamina (IEL), or stent and the vessel lumen. The area within the IEL or stent was considered the normal reference lumen area. The percent area stenosis was then defined as [(IEL or stent area minus lumen area)/(IEL or stent area)] times 100. Neointimal area was determined by subtraction of the area of the lumen from the area within the stent wires. Neointimal thickness extending perpendicular from the stent to the lumen surface was measured at each wire site. The vessel injury score was determined by the method used by Schwartz et al.14 Neointimal and medial smooth muscle cell (SMC) densities were measured in all ß-particleemitting and in 10 of the control stent sections. The total numbers of nuclei were counted in 12 randomly chosen 0.1-mm2 regions of the media and neointima from each stented section with x100 (oil immersion) light magnification.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SD. The ß-particleemitting stents were grouped into categories of low (0.15 to 0.5 µCi; tissue dose, <2000 cGy), intermediate (1.0 µCi; dose, 4000 cGy), or high (3 to 23.0 µCi; dose, >10 000 cGy) stent activity for comparison with nonradioactive stents. Lesion morphology, injury score, and cell density were compared for the control and radioactive stents by ANOVA with post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. The stent activity and neointimal and medial cell densities were analyzed with a polynomial regression model. Significance was established at P
.05. All statistics were calculated by use of Statview 4.5 (Abacus).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histology
Vessel histology demonstrated dose-specific effects of endovascular radiation on the morphology of the neointima 28 days after placement of a ß-particleemitting stent (Fig 2
). The neointima of the high-activity stents was immature, with fibrin, erythrocytes, occasional polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, and rare SMCs. The media in the vessels with high-activity stents was thinned, with areas of fibrinoid necrosis and loss of SMC nuclei, particularly in regions beneath the wire struts. SEM of the vessels with high-activity stents revealed partial endothelialization of the luminal surface. In the 1.0-µCi stents, the neointima was expanded by SMCs and a proteoglycan-rich matrix, with endothelialization of the luminal surface. Also, neovascular capillaries and extravascular red blood cells were present in the areas adjacent to the stent wires. The neointima of the low-activity stents was composed of a mature, organized layer of SMCs and matrix, with complete endothelialization of the luminal surface. The control stents had a neointima typical for 28 days after oversized implant in a porcine coronary artery.13
|
A reduction in neointimal and medial cell density was present in arteries with ß-particleemitting compared with nonradioactive stents (Fig 3
). Neointimal cell density progressively and significantly declined with increasing stent activities (r=.84, P<.00001). Also, a reduction in medial SMC density was present for activities of 0.15 to 1.0 µCi. However, there was no further reduction in medial cell density at stent activities
1.0 µCi (P=.42). The vessel morphometry for the ß-particleemitting (n=39) and nonradioactive (n=26) stents is summarized in the Table
. Five control stents were excluded from this analysis because of excessive arterial injury (injury score,
2.0). None of the ß-particleemitting stents were excluded from analysis. At low and high stent activities, a modest reduction (
30%) in neointimal formation resulted in less luminal narrowing than with nonradioactive stents (Table
). The intermediate-activity stents, however, had greater neointimal formation and more luminal narrowing than the control stents (P<.0001).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cell density of the neointima and media was reduced at all stent activities evaluated in the present study compared with nonradioactive control stents. The reduction in neointimal and medial cell density indicates that a continuous source of endovascular radiation via a ß-particleemitting stent with activities as low as 0.15 µCi is lethal to vascular SMCs in normal pig coronary arteries. Interestingly, the magnitude of reduction in neointimal cellularity (60% to 90%) was greater than the decrease in medial cellularity (40%) observed at stent activities >1.0 µCi. Therefore, in this model, neointimal SMCs appear to be more sensitive to the effects of endovascular ß-particle irradiation than the medial SMCs. Alternatively, the inhibition of SMC migration from the media into the neointima by the ß-particleemitting stent could explain the reduction in neointimal cellularity.
The biological response of normal porcine coronary arteries to the doses of endovascular irradiation used may be related to the extent of radiation-induced medial SMC damage. The histological appearance of the neointima in the high-activity stents demonstrates that endovascular radiation at doses >10 000 cGy profoundly inhibits neointimal SMC proliferation, but these doses in normal porcine coronary arteries impair endothelialization and promote fibrin-thrombus deposition. These higher doses of radiation induced a greater reduction in medial cell density than stent activities <1.0 µCi. Recent experimental studies have suggested that medial SMCs produce substances such as nitric oxide in response to arterial injury, which could limit thrombus deposition and promote endothelialization.15 Thus, radiation damage to the media might adversely affect the normal arterial response to a stent.
The reduction in neointimal formation for the low-activity (0.15- and 0.5-µCi) stents in the present study is similar to the effects demonstrated after placement in pig iliac arteries.9 In the present study, the low-activity stents were fully endothelialized and induced less medial SMC damage than the stents with activities
1.0 µCi. The results of the cell density studies indicate that the low-activity stents, which deliver
600 to 1800 cGy to the arterial wall directly subjacent to the stent wires, inhibit neointimal formation at least in part by producing cell death. These results differ from our data in porcine iliac arteries, in which a 0.15-µCi titanium mesh stent was used to deliver
300 cGy to the arterial wall. In these experiments, the cell density and the percentage of proliferating cell nuclear antigenpositive cells were similar for the ß-particleemitting and nonradioactive stents, suggesting that ultralow-dose radiation impairs cell proliferation (static effect) or possibly migration.9
The 1.0-µCi stents had a more severe neointimal response and greater luminal narrowing than the nonradioactive stents. In the 1.0-µCi-activity stents, the reduction of medial SMC density was similar to that for stents with activities
3.0 µCi. It is possible that this level of endovascular radiation was insufficient to inhibit SMC proliferation at the luminal surface within the fibrin matrix
400 µm from the stent wires, thus resulting in a more severe neointimal response than the higher stent activities. Delayed endothelialization at this dose could also result in continued fibrin-platelet deposition that promotes SMC proliferation and matrix protein production. It is also possible that the 1.0-µCi level of radiation may induce a unique stochastic effect on matrix protein production by neointimal SMCs.
Limitations of the Study
The present study is limited by the evaluation of low numbers of stents at each activity and having follow-up only at 4 weeks. It is possible that late SMC proliferation could result in more neointimal proliferation and luminal narrowing that would be identified only by studies with long-term follow-up. The results observed in this experimental model may not be applicable to the treatment of human atherosclerotic lesions. The extent of cellular damage and the ability of atherosclerotic arteries to repair in response to endovascular radiation will probably be different from the response of normal artery tissue. There are also important radiobiological considerations regarding differences in tissue exposure and dose distribution after stent placement in normal coronary arteries versus atherosclerotic arteries. In atherosclerotic arteries, the media is often insulated by a layer of plaque that would substantially reduce the dose of radiation to this layer of the artery.16 The sensitivity of plaque SMCs to endovascular radiation may be different from that of normal medial SMCs. It is possible that activities >0.5 µCi will be required for inhibition of neointimal formation in atherosclerotic arteries.
In summary, the dose-dependent effects of endovascular radiation from a ß-particleemitting stent suggests a complex biological interaction of endovascular radiation and vascular repair after placement in normal pig coronary arteries. In this porcine restenosis model, low-dose endovascular radiation via a ß-particleemitting stent modestly reduces neointimal proliferation without impairing endothelialization. Increased medial damage and delayed endothelialization with stent activities
1.0 µCi promote fibrin and thrombus deposition, which requires higher levels of endovascular radiation (>3.0 µCi) to effectively inhibit SMC proliferation within this matrix. Further study is required to better determine the clinical potential for this therapy to prevent stent restenosis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 18, 1996; revision received August 14, 1996; accepted August 25, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Beltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, Cleman M, Heuser R, Almond D, Teirstein PS, Fish RD, Colombo A, Brinker J, Moses J, Shaknovich A, Hirshfeld J, Bailey S, Ellis S, Rake R, Goldberg S, for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496-501.
3. Post MJ, de Smet BJ, van der Helm YJ, Kuntz RE. Arterial remodeling contributes to restenosis after angioplasty, but is prevented by stenting in the atherosclerotic micropig. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;(special supplement):303A. Abstract.
4. Carter AJ, Laird JR, Kufs WM, Bailey L, Reeves T, Farb A, Virmani R. Coronary stenting with a novel stainless steel balloon expandable stent: determinants of neointimal formation and changes in arterial geometry after placement in an atherosclerotic model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1270-1277.[Abstract]
5. Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Wong SC, Leon MB. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:720-724.[Abstract]
6. Painter JA, Mintz GS, Wong SC, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Leon MB. Serial intravascular ultrasound studies fail to show evidence of chronic Palmaz-Schatz stent recoil. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:398-400.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Waksman R, Robinson KA, Crocker IR, Gravanis MB, Palmer SJ, Wang C, Cipolla GD, King SB. Intracoronary radiation before stent implantation inhibits neointima formation in stented porcine coronary arteries. Circulation.. 1995;92:1383-1386.
8.
Hehrlein C, Gollan C, Donges K, Metz J, Riessen R, Fehsenfeld P, von Hodenberg E, Kubler W. Low-dose radioactive endovascular stents prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia in rabbits. Circulation. 1995;92:1570-1575.
9.
Laird JR, Carter AJ, Kufs WM, Hoopes TG, Farb A, Nott SH, Fischell RE, Fischell DR, Virmani R, Fischell TA. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation with low-dose irradiation from a ß-particleemitting stent. Circulation. 1996;93:529-536.
10.
Hehrlein C, Stintz M, Kinscherf R, Schlosser K, Huttel E, Friedrich L, Fehsenfeld P, Kubler W. Pure ß-particleemitting stents inhibit neointima formation in rabbits. Circulation. 1996;93:641-645.
11. Soares CG, McLaughlin WL. Measurement of radial dose distributions around small beta particle emitters using high resolution radiochromic foil dosimetry. Radiat Protection Dosimetry J.. 1993;47:367-372.
12. Prestwich WV, Kennett TJ, Kus FW. The dose distribution produced by a P-32 coated stent. Med Phys.. 1995;22:313-320.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Carter AJ, Laird JR, Farb A, Kufs W, Wortham DC, Virmani R. Morphologic characteristics of lesion formation and time course of smooth muscle cell proliferation in a porcine proliferative restenosis model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1398-1405.[Abstract]
14. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:267-274.[Abstract]
15. Banning AP, Buttery L, Wharton J, Black P, Polak J, Lewis MJ. Inducible nitric oxide synthase is expressed acutely in the arterial media following balloon injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:254-A. Abstract.
16. Virmani R, Farb A, Burke A. Coronary angioplasty from the perspective of the atherosclerotic plaque: morphologic predictors of immediate success and restenosis. Am Heart J. 1994;127:163-179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. A. Meyer, B. Nowak, K. Schuermann, A. Buecker, F. Moltzahn, A. Kulisch, N. Heussen, T. Gorgen, U. Bull, and R. W. Gunther Inhibition of Neointimal Proliferation with 188Re-labeled Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent in a Sheep Model Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 847 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C J McMahon, C E Mullins, and H G El Said Intrastent sonotherapy in pulmonary vein restenosis: a new treatment for a recalcitrant problem Heart, February 1, 2003; 89(2): e6 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Cheneau, R. Waksman, H. Yazdi, R. Chan, J. Fourdnadjiev, C. Berzingi, V. Shah, A. E. Ajani, L. Leborgne, and F. O. Tio How to Fix the Edge Effect of Catheter-Based Radiation Therapy in Stented Arteries Circulation, October 22, 2002; 106(17): 2271 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.W. Serruys, G. Sianos, W. van der Giessen, H.J.R.M. Bonnier, P. Urban, W. Wijns, E. Benit, M. Vandormael, R. Dorr, C. Disco, et al. Intracoronary {beta}-radiation to reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting. The Beta Radiation In Europe (BRIE) study Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2002; 23(17): 1351 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J. Wardeh, R. Albiero, I.P. Kay, A.H.M. Knook, W. Wijns, K. Kozuma, T. Nishida, V. Ferrero, P.C. Levendag, W.J. van der Giessen, et al. Angiographical Follow-Up After Radioactive "Cold Ends" Stent Implantation: A Multicenter Trial Circulation, February 5, 2002; 105(5): 550 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. van der Giessen, E. Regar, M. S. Harteveld, V. L.M.A. Coen, R. Bhagwandien, A. Au, P. C. Levendag, J. Ligthart, P. W. Serruys, A. den Boer, et al. "Edge Effect" of 32P Radioactive Stents Is Caused by the Combination of Chronic Stent Injury and Radioactive Dose Falloff Circulation, October 30, 2001; 104(18): 2236 - 2241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tepe, L. M. Dinkelborg, U. Brehme, P. Muschick, B. Noll, T. Dietrich, A. Greschniok, A. Baumbach, C. D. Claussen, and S. H. Duda Prophylaxis of Restenosis With 186Re-Labeled Stents in a Rabbit Model Circulation, August 6, 2001; 104(4): 480 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sianos, I. P. Kay, M. A. Costa, E. Regar, K. Kozuma, P. J. de Feyter, E. Boersma, C. Disco, and P. W. Serruys Geographical miss during catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation: incidence and implications in the BRIE study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Fitzgerald, A. Takagi, M. P. Moore, M. Hayase, F. D. Kolodgie, D. Corl, M. Nassi, R. Virmani, and P. G. Yock Intravascular Sonotherapy Decreases Neointimal Hyperplasia After Stent Implantation in Swine Circulation, April 10, 2001; 103(14): 1828 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Farb, S. Shroff, M. John, W. Sweet, and R. Virmani Late Arterial Responses (6 and 12 Months) After 32P {beta}-Emitting Stent Placement : Sustained Intimal Suppression With Incomplete Healing Circulation, April 10, 2001; 103(14): 1912 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.Y Salame, S Verheye, I.R Crocker, N.A.F Chronos, K.A Robinson, and S.B King III Intracoronary radiation therapy Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2001; 22(8): 629 - 647. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J Wardeh, A.H.M Knook, I.P Kay, M Sabate, V.L.M.A Coen, D.P Foley, J.N Hamburger, P.C Levendag, W.J van der Giessen, and P.W Serruys Clinical and angiographical follow-up after implantation of a 6-12{micro}Ci radioactive stent in patients with coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2001; 22(8): 669 - 675. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Kiesz, P. Buszman, J. L. Martin, E. Deutsch, M. M. Rozek, E. Gaszewska, M. Rewicki, P. Seweryniak, M. Kosmider, and M. Tendera Local Delivery of Enoxaparin to Decrease Restenosis After Stenting: Results of Initial Multicenter Trial : Polish-American Local Lovenox NIR Assessment Study (The POLONIA Study) Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103(1): 26 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Al Suwaidi, P. B. Berger, and D. R. Holmes Jr Coronary Artery Stents JAMA, October 11, 2000; 284(14): 1828 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. P. Kay, M. Sabate, M. A. Costa, K. Kozuma, M. Albertal, W. J. van der Giessen, A. J. Wardeh, J. M. R. Ligthart, V. M. A. Coen, P. C. Levendag, et al. Positive Geometric Vascular Remodeling Is Seen After Catheter-Based Radiation Followed by Conventional Stent Implantation but Not After Radioactive Stent Implantation Circulation, September 19, 2000; 102(12): 1434 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sabate, M. A. Costa, K. Kozuma, I. P. Kay, W. J. van der Giessen, V. L. M. A. Coen, J. M. R. Ligthart, P. Serrano, P. C. Levendag, and P. W. Serruys Geographic Miss : A Cause of Treatment Failure in Radio-Oncology Applied to Intracoronary Radiation Therapy Circulation, May 30, 2000; 101(21): 2467 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S Ettenson and E. R Edelman Local drug delivery: an emerging approach in the treatment of restenosis Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2000; 5(2): 97 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schulz, C. Niederer, C. Andres, R. A. Herrmann, X. Lin, R. Henkelmann, W. Panzer, C. Herrmann, D. F. Regulla, I. Wolf, et al. Endovascular Irradiation From {beta}-Particle-Emitting Gold Stents Results in Increased Neointima Formation in a Porcine Restenosis Model Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1970 - 1975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys and I. P. Kay I Like the Candy, I Hate the Wrapper : The 32P Radioactive Stent Circulation, January 4, 2000; 101(1): 3 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Albiero, M. Adamian, N. Kobayashi, A. Amato, M. Vaghetti, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo Short- and Intermediate-Term Results of 32P Radioactive {beta}-Emitting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : The Milan Dose-Response Study Circulation, January 4, 2000; 101(1): 18 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Taylor, P. D. Gorman, A. Farb, T. G. Hoopes, and R. Virmani Long-Term Coronary Vascular Response to 32P {beta}-Particle-Emitting Stents in a Canine Model Circulation, December 7, 1999; 100(23): 2366 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P Lee, S. Lo, K. Forster, A. C Yeung, and S. N Oesterle Clinical applications of brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis Vascular Medicine, November 1, 1999; 4(4): 257 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Wardeh, I. P. Kay, M. Sabate, V. L. M. A. Coen, A. L. Gijzel, J. M. R. Ligthart, A. den Boer, P. C. Levendag, W. J. van der Giessen, and P. W. Serruys {beta}-Particle-Emitting Radioactive Stent Implantation : A Safety and Feasibility Study Circulation, October 19, 1999; 100(16): 1684 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Carter, D. Scott, L. Bailey, T. Hoopes, R. Jones, and R. Virmani Dose-Response Effects of 32P Radioactive Stents in an Atherosclerotic Porcine Coronary Model Circulation, October 5, 1999; 100(14): 1548 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Meerkin, J.-C. Tardif, I. R. Crocker, A. Arsenault, M. Joyal, G. Lucier, S. B. King III, D. O. Williams, P. W. Serruys, and R. Bonan Effects of Intracoronary ß-Radiation Therapy After Coronary Angioplasty : An Intravascular Ultrasound Study Circulation, April 6, 1999; 99(13): 1660 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Topol and P. W. Serruys Frontiers in Interventional Cardiology Circulation, October 27, 1998; 98(17): 1802 - 1820. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. F. Bertrand, R. Sipehia, R. Mongrain, J. Rodes, J.-C. Tardif, L. Bilodeau, G. Cote, and M. G. Bourassa Biocompatibility aspects of new stent technology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 562 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gershlick Endovascular manipulation to restrict restenosis Vascular Medicine, August 1, 1998; 3(3): 177 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A H Gershlick and J Baron Dealing with in-stent restenosis Heart, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 319 - 323. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Brieger and E. Topol Local drug delivery systems and prevention of restenosis Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 1997; 35(3): 405 - 413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
NEW HOPE FOR PREVENTING RESTENOSIS AFTER PTCA Journal Watch (General), November 26, 1996; 1996(1126): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. van der Giessen and P. W. Serruys ß-Particle–Emitting Stents Radiate Enthusiasm in the Search for Effective Prevention of Restenosis Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2358 - 2360. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |