(Circulation. 1997;95:5-7.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Harvard Medical School, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Andrew P. Selwyn, MD, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
Key Words: Editorials lipids ischemia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Experimental Effects of LDL on Cell/Vessel Wall Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherols and ß-carotene) are exhausted, the polyunsaturated phospholipids are converted to reactive hydroxyfatty acids, lysophosphotidylcholine is formed, and the proteins in the apolipoprotein-B 100 moiety undergo covalent modification and fragmentation so that the ligand can no longer bind to the classic LDL receptor. Eventually, this "oxidized" LDL molecule becomes more negatively charged, binds to alternative sites (eg, the scavenger receptor), and becomes capable of a wide range of toxic effects, leading to cell/vessel wall dysfunction(s).9 These characteristic cell dysfunctions are consistently associated with the development of atherosclerosis in large arteries in a variety of animal models.10
A brief review of selected effects of oxidized LDL in experimental models is relevant to the dysfunctions found in the atherosclerotic arteries of patients. First, oxidized LDL can rapidly impair endothelium-dependent dilation. This probably occurs through a number of mechanisms, including direct inactivation of nitric oxide by excess production of oxygen-derived free radicals, reduced transcription of nitric oxide synthase mRNA, and posttranscriptional destabilization of mRNA.11 Activation of protein kinase C also occurs, and inflammatory processes are activated at the level of gene transcription by upregulation of nuclear factor
-B. Finally, signal transduction by the G protein Gi is impaired by downregulation of the
-i2 Gi subunit transcription. Oxidized LDL triggers these processes in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, and many are reversible within hours during a single experiment.9 12 The decrease in the availability of nitric oxide is also accompanied by many other important vascular cell dysfunctions described below. For example, there is increased platelet adhesion, stimulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor, inhibition of plasminogen activator, induction of the procoagulant tissue factor mRNA, inhibition of mRNA transcription of thrombomodulin caused by degradation by lysosomes, and finally stereochemical alterations in heparan sulfate proteoglycans.9 These changes impair the antiplatelet and anticoagulant properties of the endothelium and initiate thrombus formation.13 Upregulated or newly expressed adhesion molecules also play a role in increased monocyte recruitment.14 Free radical production, activation of protein kinase C, upregulation of nuclear factor
-B, and diminished available nitric oxide all likely play a role in the proinflammatory changes that lead to the accumulation of monocyte/macrophages and T lymphocytes. Oxidized LDL stimulates the early growth response gene-1 mRNA with increased DNA synthesis and proliferation, processes that are amplified by
-fibroblast growth factor. In health, these processes are usually contained by the continuous production of constitutive nitric oxide. Interestingly, low levels of oxidized LDL (1 to 10 µg/mL) appear to encourage cell integrity and many of these healthy and defensive functions listed above. However, physiological and pathological concentrations (10 to 100 µg/mL) can trigger all the above dysfunctions that are characteristic in experimental (and clinical) atherosclerosis.9 Moreover, well-known risk factors (eg, hypertension) increase uptake and amplify the toxic effects of oxidized LDL.
| Clinical Effects of LDL on Cell/Vessel Wall Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent clinical studies have further refined our understanding of the adverse interactions between serum lipids and essential functions of the arterial endothelium. Small, dense LDL particles and LDL particles that are more susceptible to oxidation are particularly prone to induce endothelial vasomotor dysfunction.17 18 In patients, inhibition of oxygen free radicals can lead to significant improvement in endothelium-dependent vasomotion.18
The loss of appropriate quantities of nitric oxide also likely contributes to inflammation in plaques because of increased adherence and migration of monocytes, formation of lipid-laden macrophages, and increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor and tissue factor, especially in areas surrounding a lipid core. All these dysfunctional processes in the arterial wall of patients during atherogenesis are remarkably similar to those produced in experimental models and described in detail above. Furthermore, these dysfunctions (of the endothelium and inflammatory infiltration) operate before and throughout the course of atherosclerosis, culminating when a fragile fibrous cap ruptures and releases the thrombogenic lipid core, thus triggering intravascular thrombus formation.19 Finally, the report by Tamai et al,1 along with prior studies,5 6 7 has demonstrated in the clinical setting that the adverse effects of LDL leading to loss of vasodilator function are dynamic and can fluctuate over months or weeks and can change from minute to minute.
| Experimental Effects of Lipid Therapies on Vascular Dysfunction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Clinical Effects of Therapies on Vascular Dysfunction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These physiological observations of the treatment of vascular dysfunction in patients have occurred in parallel with large-scale therapeutic trials that demonstrated that cholesterol and LDL lowering results in very substantial reductions in the need for coronary revascularization procedures.3 4 Given the common indications for revascularization, this finding almost certainly means that therapy resulted in less angina. Therapeutic trials have also shown that effective lipid lowering results in improvement in measures of transient myocardial ischemia with positron emission tomography and ambulatory monitoring of ECGs in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.22 Thus, evidence has accumulated of a reduction in these important signs of increased risk of adverse outcome, and this is supported directly by large trials that show major reductions in myocardial infarction and coronary death.3 4
| Summary and Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The above leads us to some important but unanswered questions. Can we rely on clinical measures of arterial vasomotor dysfunction to represent the other important cell dysfunctions (eg, inflammation, abnormal growth) while monitoring the response to therapeutic interventions? How can we effectively inhibit oxidation of LDL in the arterial wall, and is this useful in reversing the many cell dysfunctions and clinical sequelae of coronary atherosclerosis? What is the time course for restoration of endothelial dysfunction in the atherosclerotic epicardial coronary arteries in patients with effective lipid-lowering therapy? The intracellular responses to oxidized LDL are so numerous (loss of vasodilation, loss of anticoagulant mechanisms, abnormal inflammation, and growth) that targeting therapies to specific pathways may prove difficult.
Parallel efforts in basic physiological and clinical research have resulted in remarkable progress that has improved outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease. We expect that many of the characteristic cell/vessel wall dysfunctions that result from adverse interactions with risk factors are dynamic and can be manipulated in a relatively short time frame. Treatment of atherogenic lipids with other risk factors must be further refined and may well become the cornerstone for effective management of angina, unstable syndromes, and ischemia in addition to the control of important outcomes such as myocardial infarction and coronary death.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. D. Sesso, J. E. Buring, M. J. Chown, P. M Ridker, and J. M. Gaziano A Prospective Study of Plasma Lipid Levels and Hypertension in Women Arch Intern Med, November 14, 2005; 165(20): 2420 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.D. Waters and K.K. Khush Management of the acute coronary syndrome patient Eur. Heart J. Suppl., July 1, 2004; 6(suppl_C): C49 - C57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Forrester, C. N. Bairey-Merz, and S. Kaul The aggressive low density lipoprotein lowering controversy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1419 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A P Mansur, C V Serrano Jr, J C Nicolau, L A M César, and J A F Ramires Effect of cholesterol lowering treatment on positive exercise tests in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and normal coronary angiograms Heart, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 689 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Waters Cholesterol Lowering : Should It Continue to Be the Last Thing We Do? Circulation, June 29, 1999; 99(25): 3215 - 3217. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dupuis, J.-C. Tardif, P. Cernacek, and P. Theroux Cholesterol Reduction Rapidly Improves Endothelial Function After Acute Coronary Syndromes : The RECIFE (Reduction of Cholesterol in Ischemia and Function of the Endothelium) Trial Circulation, June 29, 1999; 99(25): 3227 - 3233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, J. J. Badimon, and J. H Chesebro Atherothrombosis: mechanisms and clinical therapeutic approaches Vascular Medicine, August 1, 1998; 3(3): 231 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Li, B. Yang, and J. L. Mehta Ox-LDL induces apoptosis in human coronary artery endothelial cells: role of PKC, PTK, bcl-2, and Fas Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): H568 - H576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bennett-Richards, M. Kattenhorn, A. Donald, G. Oakley, Z. Varghese, L. Rees, and J.E. Deanfield Does Oral Folic Acid Lower Total Homocysteine Levels and Improve Endothelial Function in Children With Chronic Renal Failure? Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1810 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |