(Circulation. 1997;95:2434-2440.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Departments of Pediatrics (R.O.-L., H.L., J.S., V.G., J.A.T.) and Molecular and Human Genetics (J.A.T.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify genomic DNA, and reverse-transcriptase PCR amplified cDNA from RNA obtained from heart and lymphoblastoid cell lines. Primers to the muscle promoter, brain promoter, and Purkinje cell promoter were designed, in addition to the exon 1 to exon 14 regions of dystrophin. Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis was used for mutation detection, and DNA sequencing defined the mutation. Protein modeling was used for amino acid and secondary structure analysis. A missense mutation in exon 9 at nucleotide 1043 was identified that causes an alanine to be substituted for threonine, a highly conserved amino acid, at position 279 (T279A). This mutation results in a change in polarity in the evolutionarily conserved first hinge region (H1) of the protein and substitution of a ß-sheet for
-helix in this portion of the protein, destabilizing the protein.
Conclusions A novel missense mutation in exon 9 of dystrophin causing an abnormality at H1 leads to the cardiospecific phenotype of XLCM.
Key Words: cardiomyopathy genetics dystrophin mutation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
XLCM is a severe and rapidly progressive myocardial disease that affects young men in their teens or early twenties.8 Typically, affected males present with severe congestive heart failure that results in death or cardiac transplantation within 1 to 2 years of diagnosis. Clinically, XLCM appears to be identical to other causes of DCM except for its X-linked transmission6 8 9 and elevated serum CK-MM without evidence of clinical skeletal myopathy. Female carriers with XLCM may manifest symptoms later in life, usually in the fifth decade, but the disease is mild and progresses slowly.8
Molecular genetic linkage to the 5' end of the dystrophin gene at Xp21 was previously reported by Towbin et al.9 In addition, N-terminal dystrophin antibody against cardiac tissue protein extracts showed decreased abundance (or absence) of dystrophin, whereas C-terminal antibody immunoblots were normal.9 Dystrophin antibody against the rod domain also demonstrated low abundance of protein.10 Immunoblots using N-terminal, C-terminal, and rod domain dystrophin antibodies against skeletal muscle protein demonstrated normal dystrophin, however.9 10
The dystrophin gene, which causes DMD and the milder allelic form, BMD, is the largest gene identified in humans thus far, covering >2.5 Mb and having 79 exons.11 12 The corresponding 14-kb dystrophin mRNA is expressed predominantly in skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle, although lower levels also appear in brain. Transcription of dystrophin in different tissues is regulated from either the PB,13 14 15 which is active predominantly in neuronal cells; the PM,16 which is active in differentiated myogenic cells and glial cells; and the PP,17 18 which is active in cerebellum. The resultant protein, dystrophin,12 19 is a 427-kD protein localized to the cytoplasmic face of the sarcolemma, colocalizing with ß-spectrin and vinculin at the sarcolemma.20 The C-terminal region of dystrophin is bound to the protoplasmic half of the plasmalemma. Thus, dystrophin forms an intricate part of the muscle cytoskeleton and may function to link the normal contractile apparatus to the sarcolemma. In skeletal and cardiac muscle, the C-terminal domain is bound to a large oligomeric glycoprotein complex of six novel proteins localized to the sarcolemma21 22 23 24 ; the N-terminus attaches to actin.
In DMD, the levels of all members of the oligomeric glycoprotein complex are reduced.25 In BMD, however, there is only a general mild reduction in these proteins.26 It is believed that dystrophin localizes or stabilizes this oligomeric protein complex.27 Without dystrophin, the complex is unable to organize properly, and consequently the linkage between the extracellular matrix and sarcolemma is disrupted.28
Muntoni et al29 reported a deletion within the PM and E1 of dystrophin in a family with DCM, X-linked inheritance, and mild abnormalities of skeletal muscle histology and dystrophin immunohistochemical staining. They showed this mutation to be the cause of disease in this family and speculated that this deletion was the responsible mutation in all patients with XLCM. More recently, these authors30 31 also confirmed the dystrophin protein findings of Towbin et al.9 10 Holder et al32 described a mutation in the muscle promoter that potentially affects cardiac-specific regulatory sequences and therefore could selectively cause DCM without significant skeletal myopathy. This mutation is quite uncommon in BMD and DMD patients screened for dystrophin deletions,33 however. Since previous reports of PM-E1 mutations in other unrelated patients were usually associated only with mild skeletal muscle disease without cardiac disease,13 34 doubt arose that this mutation was the only mutation leading to XLCM. In fact, only the patient reported by Yoshida et al35 with an E1 deletion and normal PM had DCM. In addition, Towbin and Ortiz-Lopez36 reported on three families with documented XLCM in whom PM-E1 was normal. More recently, Milasin et al37 reported a point mutation in the 5' splice site of dystrophin E1-I1 boundary causing XLCM clinically and abolishing expression of dystrophin in cardiac tissue. Therefore, XLCM appears to be due to various different mutations in the dystrophin gene. In this report, we describe a novel missense mutation in the 5' end of dystrophin in the originally described family with XLCM,8 and we also provide further data that suggest that there is allelic heterogeneity for XLCM, because two other families with XLCM studied here have none of the reported dystrophin mutations.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Control Individuals
One hundred unrelated and unaffected individuals (50 male, 50 female; 50 black and 50 white), as determined by history, physical examination, and echocardiography, were analyzed. After informed consent was obtained, blood for lymphoblastoid cell line immortalization38 was obtained.
Procedures
RT-PCR. RNA was prepared from lymphoblastoid cell lines38 or cardiac tissue as previously described.39 Briefly, 2 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20-µL reaction with 5 µg of random hexamer primers (Gibco-BRL) and 100 U murine Moloney leukemia virus RT at 37°C in the buffer provided by the supplier (Gibco-BRL). Of the RT reaction, 2 µL was used for each PCR reaction in 25 µL of 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 67 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 16.6 mmol/L ammonium sulfate, 0.01% Tween-20, 200 µmol/L of each dNTP, 25 pmol of each primer, and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). PCR conditions included 94°C for 3 minutes, 30 cycles of 92°C for 1 minute, 58°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute, and a final extension of 72°C for 5 minutes. The PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel. The primers used for the amplification of the first 14 exons of dystrophin cDNA were derived from the reported dystrophin sequence11 ; primers used for RT-PCR were exon 1F, 5'-TGGGAAGAAGTAGAGGACTGTTATG-3'; exon 5R, 5'-TTGACCTGCCAGTGGAGGAT-3'; exon 4F, 5'-GCA CTGCGGGTTTTGCAGAA-3'; exon 7R, 5'-GAATGCATTCCAGTCGTTGTGT-3'; exon 6F, 5'-TGAATGCTCTC ATCCAGTCATAG-3'; exon 10R, 5'-CTCTCCATCA ATGAACTGCC-3'; exon 10F, 5'-CATTGCAAGCACAAG GAGAG-3'; and exon 13R, 5'-CAGTTGCGTGATCTCCACTA GATTC-3'.
PCR amplification of genomic DNA. The primers used to amplify sequences of the PB, PM, PP, and exon-intron junctions were designed with the previously reported sequences13 14 15 16 17 and conditions. The primers used for promoter amplification included the following: PM, 5'-GAAGATCTAGACAGTGGAT ACATAACAAATGCATG-3'; E1R, 5'-TTCTCCGAAG GTAATTGCCTCCCAGATCTGAGTCC-3'; PBF, 5'-GAA GATCTATATTTTACAACGCAGAAATGTGG-3'; PBR, 5'-CTTCCATGCCAGCTGTTTTTCCTGTCACTC-3'; PpF, 5'-CAGCCTCCGCAGAATTTGAAATG-3'; and exon 2R, 5'-CTTAGAAAATTGTGCATTTACCCA-3'.
Multiplex PCR. Multiplex PCR was performed with the five primer pairs described by Beggs et al40 and nine primer pairs described by Chamberlain et al41 ; an additional set of primers designed to amplify exon 9 (F, 5'-GAATTCCTCTCGCAGAT CACG-3'; R, 5'-GTAAATGTTGACAGACCTGTG-3') was also added to each. This multiplex PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94°C for 6 minutes, 94°C for 30 seconds, 54°C for 30 seconds, 65°C for 4 minutes (25 cycles), and 65°C for 7 minutes. Amplification products were visualized on a 3% agarose gel with ethidium bromide under ultraviolet light.
SSCP. Mutation analysis was performed by the method of Orita et al.42 PCR primers were designed to amplify a region including the 3' portion of intron 8 and the 3' end of exon 9. This region flanked the normal, polymorphic, or mutated sequence of exon 9 (Fig 1A
, primers a through d). Radioactive PCR was performed with 100 ng genomic DNA in a 10-µL reaction containing 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, 0.05 µCi [
-32P]dCTP, 0.5 U Taq polymerase, and 30 rounds of amplification (92°C for 45 seconds, 60°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute). After PCR amplification, the samples were denatured by addition of 5 µL formamide dye (95% formamide, 20 mmol/L EDTA, 0.05% bromophenol blue, and 0.05% xylene cyanol) at 85°C for 5 minutes. After 10 minutes of cooling on ice, 3 µL of sample was electrophoresed on a nondenaturing 10% polyacrylamide:bisacrylamide (50:1) gel at 8 W over 24 hours in a 4°C cold room. Bands were visualized by exposure of the dried gels to Kodak X-AR film.
|
Sequencing. Normal and aberrant SSCP conformers were cut directly from dried gels and eluted in 100 µL distilled water (65°C for 30 minutes), and the eluted DNA (10 µL) was used as the template in a second PCR using the original primer pair. The PCR products were sequenced directly after fractionation in 2% low-melting agarose gel (FMC Corp) and purified by Qiaquick columns (Qiagen). Purified PCR products (200 ng) were used for each sequencing reaction with cycle sequencing.43 Alternatively, purified PCR products were cloned into pBluescript 11 SK(+) (Stratagene) by the T-vector method as described previously.44 Manual sequencing was performed according to conditions suggested by the supplier (United States Biochemical), and automated sequences were performed on an ABI Automated Sequencer (ABI model 373).
Protein modeling. Dystrophin sequences were analyzed for species conservation by use of GenBank. Analysis of amino acid sequences was performed by the MOSAIC computer program.45 46 Hydrophobicity and plot structure predictions were performed according to the Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson prediction method.47
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PCR Amplification of Promoter-Specific Transcripts
With oligonucleotide primers designed to amplify sequences of the PB,13 PM,16 29 PP,17 and E1-I111 29 37 from DNA and RNA isolated from lymphoblastoid cell lines and cardiac tissue, normal amplification of all promoters and E1-I1 was seen in all individuals. DNA sequencing revealed normal sequences of all amplified products.
5' Dystrophin Mutation Analysis
Primers designed to individually amplify exons 2 through 14 of dystrophin11 were used to analyze the region with tightest linkage in XLCM-1, XLCM-2, and XLCM-3. In XLCM-2 and XLCM-3, all exons were able to be amplified, and the resultant amplimers were the predicted sizes. SSCP analysis was also normal (ie, no abnormal conformers) in XLCM-2 and XLCM-3, as were the sequences of all amplimers. In XLCM-1, however, exon 9 could not be amplified with normal sequence primers (ie, primers a/b). SSCP analysis of affected and carrier individuals from XLCM-1 demonstrated an abnormal conformer at exon 9 in all affected individuals (hemizygous); a heterozygous result (an abnormal conformer and a normal conformer) was found in all carrier females (Fig 2
). Evaluation of exon 9 sequence (GenBank reference No. X14298) identified a mutation at nucleotide 1043, with substitution of A
G only in affected and carrier individuals (Fig 3
). The A
G mutation changes the conserved amino acid threonine at amino acid position 279 to alanine (T279A). This amino acid, which is within the H1 of dystrophin,48 49 is conserved across species50 51 52 53 54 (Table
). Oligonucleotide primers containing the mutated sequence within the primers (primers a/c, Fig 1A
) were able to amplify a PCR product in affected and carrier XLCM-1 patients but not in unaffected individuals (Fig 1B
), whereas PCR primers designed to the normal sequence (primers a/b, Fig 1A
) were able to amplify the normal exon 9 sequence in unaffected individuals but were unable to amplify this portion of exon 9 in affected patients in XLCM-1 (Fig 1B
). This selective amplification of the mutated sequence in affected individuals by use of mutation-specific primers occurred because of the use of stringent PCR conditions and sequence-specific oligonucleotides. Multiplex PCR40 41 using 6 primer pairs (PM, exon 9, exon 13, exon 43, exon 50, exon 52) and 10 primer pairs (exon 4, exon 8, exon 9, exon 12, exon 17, exon 19, exon 44, exon 45, exon 48, exon 51) identified the mutation in all affected and carrier individuals from XLCM-1 at exon 9. Primers designed to flank the mutated region amplified appropriately in all individuals; sequence analysis in the affected patients in pedigree XLCM-1 identified this same mutation. Hence, the missense mutation segregates with disease status within family XLCM-1. No other individuals in XLCM-1, XLCM-2, or XLCM-3 had the A
G mutation at nucleotide 1043; none of 100 unrelated control individuals analyzed had the mutation as seen by PCR, SSCP, and mutation analysis. However, a G
A polymorphism in the third nucleotide of this codon was commonly detected at nucleotide 1045, consistent with codon redundancy (degenerate code). In fact, the G
A polymorphism at 1045 was seen in 8% of individuals in the three families as well as in 8% of the 100 unrelated normal control patients analyzed.
|
|
|
Dystrophin Protein Analysis
Analysis of amino acid sequences was performed by the MOSAIC computer program45 46 ; prediction of
-helix and ß-sheet was performed by a segment-oriented method designed to locate secondary structure elements. In addition, hydrophobicity and plot structure predictions were performed by use of the Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson prediction.47 The T279A amino acid substitution induces a change in the polarity in this critical region of the dystrophin protein because threonine is a neutral-polar amino acid and alanine is neutral-nonpolar. This, in turn, changes the secondary and tertiary structure of dystrophin by substituting a ß-sheet for
-helix at the H1 between the N-terminal domain and rod domain of dystrophin49 55 (Fig 4
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G at position 1043) and is within a critical structural region (H1) of this cytoskeletal protein.19 47 48 49 55 56 The resultant amino acid substitution (threonine
alanine) at amino acid 279 is within a highly conserved portion of the protein,50 51 52 53 54 causing a change in polarity in this part of the protein and leading to a change in the dystrophin secondary and tertiary structure. The end result is conversion of a segment of
-helix to a ß-sheet in the H1 between the N-terminal domain and the rod domain of dystrophin49 ; this abnormality could potentially destabilize the protein. This mutation was not found in the other two XLCM families (XLCM-2, XLCM-3) studied.
Dystrophin is predicted to fold into four domains,19 49 56 including the N-terminal domain, a long repeat domain (rod domain), a cysteine-rich domain, and a C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain has significant similarity to the N-terminal domain of
-actinin and ß-spectrin,57 58 possibly reflecting a common actin-binding function. The large midportion of the protein is formed by repeat elements predicted to adopt a triple-helical conformation,59 and this region is quite similar to that seen in
-actinin and spectrin as well. In dystrophin, this repeat domain is composed of 24 repeat units (
109 amino acid repeats) and shows evolutionary conservation.60 In addition, Koenig and Kunkel49 showed that four hinge segments are interspersed along the dystrophin molecule, and these hinges appear to confer flexibility to the membrane-associated network of dystrophin, resulting in membrane resilience. The existence of these flexible hinges at precise positions within the elongated dystrophin molecule is thought to be important for the mechanical properties of the membrane cytoskeleton. It is possible that flexibility is needed during contraction-relaxation of the muscle fibers. These hinge regions are found at positions within the protein encoded by exon 9 and part of exon 8 (hinge 1, amino acid 253 to 327), exon 17 (hinge 2, amino acid 667 to 717), and exon 50 to 51 (hinge 3, amino acid 2424 to 2470); the hinge 4 sequence (amino acid 3041 to 3112) has not been definitively identified.49 The mutation identified in family XLCM-1 is in exon 9, within the H1.
It appears that dystrophin performs a number of distinct cytoskeletal functions. Three related but conceptually distinct roles of dystrophin function have been suggested: (1) membrane stability (dystrophin may stabilize the membrane during repeated cycles of muscle contraction), (2) force transduction (dystrophin may link the contractile force produced in the intracellular domain to the extracellular environment), and (3) organization of membrane specializations. The biochemistry and function of the cardiac membrane and T tubules appear to be different from those of skeletal muscle. In the heart, this exon 9 mutation affecting the H1 portion of the protein is likely to result in loss of membrane integrity and eventual loss of function, probably due to the continual stress placed on the beating pump. In addition, this portion of the protein has been shown to have significant sequence similarity to troponin I61 in the region that functionally enables binding with calcium binding proteins. It has also been speculated that dystrophin binds to calmodulin in this region, thereby modulating interaction of dystrophin with actin or other proteins associated with the cytoskeleton. It is possible that disruption of this region of dystrophin leads to the development of dilated cardiomyopathy, in part because of the inability of the mutated protein to modulate this interaction. Conversely, skeletal muscle appears to maintain normal clinical function significantly longer in XLCM patients, with the only evidence of skeletal disease being elevated serum CK-MM.
The mutation identified in family XLCM-1 reported here differs from the PM-E1 deletion mutation reported by Muntoni et al29 and the E1-I1 splice site mutation reported by Milasin et al.37 Because two other families with XLCM (XLCM-2, XLCM-3) that were also analyzed for the PM mutation, E1-I1 boundary mutation, and exon 9 mutation have normal sequences in these portions of the dystrophin gene, one can speculate that the XLCM phenotype results from multiple different dystrophin mutations that are within important functional regions of this huge protein. This possibility provides a different mechanism for the development of differential dystrophinopathic phenotypes than does the "frame-shift" hypothesis,62 63 which is believed to explain the phenotypic differences between the allelic diseases DMD and BMD when deletions occur in >95% of cases.
Mutations and polymorphisms in exon 9 have rarely been reported.64 65 66 67 68 Roberts et al65 analyzed 70 small mutations and Prior et al66 reviewed 29 mutations, and in no case was exon 9 mutated. Reiss and Rininsland64 described a constitutive exon 9 cassette-splicing phenomenon found in peripheral blood lymphocyte studies. These authors found that in approximately half of the transcripts of the dystrophin gene isolated from lymphocytes, exon 9 was omitted. This exon skipping was found to occur to a variable extent in all tissues not specifically expressing dystrophin but was rarely seen in muscle, heart, or brain. When seen, omission of exon 9 did not disrupt the reading frame of the mRNA. They also suggested that when exon 9 mutations occur, BMD results (as long as the correct reading frame is maintained), consistent with the observations of Koenig et al.63
Once the mutations are identified in other families with XLCM (ie, XLCM-2 and XLCM-3), more insight will be gained as to the important cardiac functional regions of dystrophin. Animal models (such as transgenic mice) with these "cardiospecific mutations" could open doors to our knowledge of the function of the dystrophin protein as well as its relationship to other interrelated proteins.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Guest editor for this article was Christine Seidman, MD, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Received June 3, 1996; revision received November 12, 1996; accepted December 13, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helix and ß-strand segments of globular proteins. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994;10:661-669.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Philipp, C. Broschk, A. Vollmar, and O. Distl Evaluation of Tafazzin as Candidate for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Irish Wolfhounds J. Hered., July 9, 2007; (2007) esm045v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kimura, M. Ikezawa, S. Ozasa, K. Ito, H. Ueno, K. Yoshioka, S. Ijiri, K. Nomura, K. Nakamura, M. Matuskura, et al. Novel Mutation in Splicing Donor of Dystrophin Gene First Exon in a Patient With Dilated Cardiomyopathy but No Clinical Signs of Skeletal Myopathy J Child Neurol, July 1, 2007; 22(7): 901 - 906. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Richard, E. Villard, P. Charron, and R. Isnard The Genetic Bases of Cardiomyopathies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2006; 48(9_Suppl_A): A79 - A89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Colan Evolving Therapeutic Strategies for Dystrophinopathies: Potential for Conflict Between Cardiac and Skeletal Needs Circulation, November 1, 2005; 112(18): 2756 - 2758. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Jefferies, B. W. Eidem, J. W. Belmont, W. J. Craigen, S. M. Ware, S. D. Fernbach, S. R. Neish, E. O. Smith, and J. A. Towbin Genetic Predictors and Remodeling of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Muscular Dystrophy Circulation, November 1, 2005; 112(18): 2799 - 2804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Mahon, R. T. Murphy, C. A. MacRae, A. L.P. Caforio, P. M. Elliott, and W. J. McKenna Echocardiographic Evaluation in Asymptomatic Relatives of Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy Reveals Preclinical Disease Ann Intern Med, July 19, 2005; 143(2): 108 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Burkett and R. E. Hershberger Clinical and genetic issues in familial dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 969 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Cohen and F Muntoni Multiple pathogenetic mechanisms in X linked dilated cardiomyopathy Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 835 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Karkkainen, T. Helio, R. Miettinen, P. Tuomainen, P. Peltola, J. Rummukainen, K. Ylitalo, M. Kaartinen, J. Kuusisto, L. Toivonen, et al. A novel mutation, Ser143Pro, in the lamin A/C gene is common in finnish patients with familial dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2004; 25(10): 885 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Lapidos, R. Kakkar, and E. M. McNally The Dystrophin Glycoprotein Complex: Signaling Strength and Integrity for the Sarcolemma Circ. Res., April 30, 2004; 94(8): 1023 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Gualandi, C Trabanelli, P Rimessi, E Calzolari, L Toffolatti, T Patarnello, G Kunz, F Muntoni, and A Ferlini Multiple exon skipping and RNA circularisation contribute to the severe phenotypic expression of exon 5 dystrophin deletion J. Med. Genet., August 1, 2003; 40(8): e100 - 100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Feng, J. Yan, C. H. Buzin, S. S. Sommer, and J. A. Towbin Comprehensive mutation scanning of the dystrophin gene in patients with nonsyndromic X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1120 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Mahon, B. P. Madden, A. L. P. Caforio, P. M. Elliott, A. J. Haven, B. E. Keogh, M. J. Davies, and W. J. McKenna Immunohistologic evidence of myocardial disease in apparently healthy relatives of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2002; 39(3): 455 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Mendell, C. H. Buzin, J. Feng, J. Yan, C. Serrano, D. S. Sangani, C. Wall, T. W. Prior, and S. S. Sommer Diagnosis of Duchenne dystrophy by enhanced detection of small mutations Neurology, August 28, 2001; 57(4): 645 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||